ERDAS IMAGINE ERDAS APPOLO USER FORUM Japan 2014

��������ERDAS IMAGINE� �

���������������

���

ERDAS IMAGINE & ERDAS APOLLOUSER FORUM Japan 20142014/10/29

!"#$%����

&'()*�+,

LAI, PAI

-./0

&1

�2

�3�456

78

9:

DEM(DSM(DCHM

&';<

)*=>?NDVI(EVI@

(ABCD(Lidar)

(EFGH(Lidar)

(EFGH)

-./0

(Lidar)III 2

JK�LM3N

• ���+,;<– OPQGHR�%$;<– LidarS��R��#$;<

• T>�EFGHR�%$NDVI�UQVWXY

3

���+,;<

• Z[\(Z]^_\?`abcde(f�ghij@– kl;m � nkl;m

• 2;.\– opqr0s1%– t�uvw�x;<shyz�w{|%

• OPQGHR�%$;<– }~VW�t���w�r0��– ��V����

Cls 3

Cls 1

Cls 2

4

����

• ���1�� ������– ���?��@��

– ���:60km2

– ���(��7R���719%(����&� 41%(����&� 2%(����&� 37%

ALOS AVNIR-2

�JAXA5

;<(1) ¡PQGH¢OPQGH;<�op

• EFGH£¤– QuickBird (2007/4/12)– QuickBird (2007/5/23)– QuickBird (2007/7/8)

• ¡PQ?4¥(5¥(7¥GH@¢OPQ?4¥¦5¥(4¥¦7¥@GH�;<r0�op

• ;<gbe– e§(¨c©(ªy`«(yb`«(����&(�7I���

6

¡PQGH�;<¬­

4¥GH?OA=82.9%@

5¥GH?OA=74.0%@7¥GH?OA=86.7%@

CedarCypressRed Pine

LarchBroadleaf

Urban

4z�j?B, G, R, IR@�®0¯R�%°Z[\�±²;<

7

¡PQGH�;<¬­?³´��3w�³´@

• 4¥GH ��&¢��&�µ¶s·|%• 7¥GH ��&3(��&3w�µ¶sopq·|%

Cedar Cypress Red Pine Larch Broadleaf Urban

Cedar 165 49 31 1 0 0 246 67.1

Cypress 55 240 14 2 0 0 311 77.2

Red Pine 12 20 262 4 0 0 298 87.9

Larch 2 0 3 265 33 0 303 87.5

Broadleaf 6 0 0 85 240 0 331 72.5

Urban 0 0 0 0 1 368 369 99.7

240 309 310 357 274 368 1858

68.8 77.7 84.5 74.2 87.6 100.0 OA�%� 82.9

Reference to Ground truth or Forest registerTotal

UA�%�

Cla

ssifi

ed re

sult

Total

PA�%�

Cedar Cypress Red Pine Larch Broadleaf Urban

Cedar 197 18 31 7 2 0 255 77.3

Cypress 22 252 8 9 0 0 291 86.6

Red Pine 13 12 267 52 1 16 361 74.0

Larch 7 18 2 275 4 0 306 89.9

Broadleaf 1 9 0 14 267 0 291 91.8

Urban 0 0 2 0 0 352 354 99.4

240 309 310 357 274 368 1858

82.1 81.6 86.1 77.0 97.4 95.7 OA�%� 86.7PA�%�C

lass

ified

resu

lt

Total

Reference to Ground truth or Forest registerTotal

UA�%�

4¥

7¥

8

4¥+5¥GH?OA=89.1%@

4¥+7¥GH?OA=93.4%@

OPQGH�;<¬­

CedarCypressRed Pine

LarchBroadleaf

Urban

• 4z�j?4¥@¦4z�j?5¥or 7¥@�¸8z�j�®0¯R�%°Z[\�±²;<

9

OPQGH�;<¬­?³´��3w�³´@

• ��&¢��&�µ¶¢(��&3(��&3�µ¶s¹·• OA 86.7% º93.4% ���• $»#(³´��¼½�r0¾¿À

4¥+7¥ Cedar Cypress Red Pine Larch Broadleaf Urban

Cedar 213 19 16 0 0 0 248 85.9

Cypress 14 267 5 2 0 0 288 92.7

Red Pine 8 23 289 11 0 0 331 87.3

Larch 4 0 0 325 1 0 330 98.5

Broadleaf 1 0 0 19 273 0 293 93.2

Urban 0 0 0 0 0 368 368 100.0

240 309 310 357 274 368 1858

88.8 86.4 93.2 91.0 99.6 100.0 OA�%� 93.4

Cla

ssifi

ed re

sult

Total

PA���

TotalUA�%�

Reference to Ground truth or Forest register

Cedar Cypress Red Pine Larch Broadleaf Urban

Cedar 179 9 48 0 0 0 236 75.8

Cypress 52 279 52 0 0 0 383 72.8

Red Pine 7 21 210 6 0 0 244 86.1

Larch 0 0 0 345 0 0 345 100.0

Broadleaf 2 0 0 6 274 0 282 97.2

Urban 0 0 0 0 0 368 368 100.0

240 309 310 357 274 368 1858

74.6 90.3 67.7 96.6 100.0 100.0 OA�%� 89.1

Cla

ssifi

ed re

sult

Total

PA���

Reference to Ground truth or Forest registerTotal

UA�%�4¥+5¥

10

;<(2) 2;.\(LidarS��R��#$;<

• Á�S��£¤– QuickBird (2002/10/3)– QuickBird (2007/4/12)– QuickBird (2007/5/23)– QuickBird (2007/7/8)– GeoEye (2011/9/27)– DCHM, Lidar (2002�10¥) XH02mÂ0

• ��ÃÄ�;<¬­• DCHM(&1)S��R�%$Å7�;<

– Å7¾����&¢}~VWsÆÇx;<#ÈÉ%

11

;<ÊË�

1XH0EFGH

NDVIGH

LidarS��

DCHM

ÌÍÎÏÐGHS��

��&� ��&� ��7 Å7 ���I�7

��&� ��&�

����&� ����&� ����&�

DSM(DEMÑÒ&Ó1S���*Ô

EFGH�®0��ÕÖNDVI¯(DCHM�S��Rעذ(Z[\�±²;<

EFGH�®0��±²��&�(��&��Z[\�±²;<#(��&�R;Ù

ZÚq�6gbe�;<

?yb`«@ 12

• Area 1?9Û+Ü�@– SatImage bnd 1-4, QuickBird

(2007/5/23)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2002/10/3)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2007/5/23)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2007/7/8)

– NDVI, GeoEye (2011/9/27)

– DCHM, Lidar

R: DCHMG: NDVI 2007/7/8B: NDVI 2007/5/23

ÃÄq�Ý%¢Þß¾(���(�7àsá%¢Þß¾Å7

Å7�K-

13

• Area 2 (9Û+Ü�)– SatImage bnd 1-4, QuickBird

(2007/5/23)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2002/10/3)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2007/4/12)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2007/5/23)

– NDVI, GeoEye (2011/9/27)

– DCHM, Lidar

R: DCHMG: NDVI 2007/4/12B: NDVI 2007/5/23

�s·|Ç(âsã%¢Þß?ä@¾(��&

�K-

14

• Area 3 ?7Û+Ü�@– SatImage bnd 1-4, GeoEye

(2007/5/23)

– NDVI, QuickBird (2007/4/12)

– NDVI, GeoEye (2011/9/27)

– DCHM, Lidar

R: DCHMG: NDVI 2011/9/27B: NDVI 2007/4/12

âs·|Ç(�sO%¢Þß¾��&

�K-

15

• ÎÔ;<¬­?6gbe@– ����&(����&R;<

CedarCypressRed Pine

LarchBroadleaf

Urban

4¥+5¥GH

Å7

&1S���±²Å7s;<åæ°%�

16

CedarCypressRed Pine

LarchBroadleaf

Urban

����&?yb`«@s;<åæ°%�

4¥+5¥GH

yb`«

����&

• ÎÔ;<¬­?6gbe@– ����&(����&R;<

17

T>�EFGHR�%$NDVI�UQVWXY

• ��çq– ���*U�¢è|é(��êëìí?�îïðìí@�UQVW�Xñ

t���ò����ó��ô�UQVW

õ��ô=��ö/÷�ö

���*U�ø%(ùLúû(7ü�ïð�±²(ý�þ���ö¾¹·É��

�������

18

1982������� 2002�������

�������¾��#°%�#Ñ#(��#$ 7��¾�Ïæ°%|%$Ø(��¾�%

Landsat MSS(1970����) ~Z��EFGH(Terra/ASTER) R�%$UQVWXY�±²�����R�ö³´É�

T>�EFGHR�%$NDVI�UQVWXY

t���ò�����ÊÛi��CD

19

�������

• ���B�����7 !i��"#�

• 1984�ÑÒ�$I�öR¸%

• &'&Ô– e§4.3%(¨c©67.0%(ªy`«4.5%('�(��&4.3%(��&19.9%

GS

MRGU

2007��ASTERGH

�ERSDAC

20

)*ö��ö³´?NDVI@

NDVI = NIR - RNIR + R

NIR:Æà½���)*ôR +,4?à@���)*ô

• NDVI?Normalized Difference Vegetation Index@– )*ö���±Ç�%Òæ�

– 78�±�-�-.R/�Ç%

– 01.011.0�¯R¢�1.0�Æ%23)*ösO%¢45Òæ�

– NIR(RR�%°%�$Ø(6%EFS��è��+í• 758Landsat/MSS, SPOT/HRV¾(âz�js�%$ØEVI¾��9+

21

XY��%$EFS��

:%K EF/��; Aó;Xí

1984/11/10 Landsat-4/MSS 80 m

1987/11/11 Landsat-5/MSS 80 m

1992/11/24 Landsat-5/Tm 30 m

2005/11/4 Terra/ASTER VNIR 15 m

2007/11/19 Terra/ASTER VNIR 15 m

2010/11/11 Terra/ASTER VNIR 15 m

• Landsat

– MSS R: 0.60 - 0.70, NIR: 0.70 - 0.80 [�m]

– TM R: 0.63 - 0.69, NIR: 0.76 - 0.90 [�m]

• Terra/ASTER

– R: 0.66 - 0.69, NIR: 0.76 - 0.86 [�m]

</�¾=|�:%>U�wt�s(NDVI�³´¾+í�

22

�?@k?)*ôþ�VA@

• B¡|�?@k  �ebSCª�e�@k�D

• �?@k,ËEbë– MODTRAN?MODer- ate resolution atmospheric

TRANsmission@• ERDAS IMAGINE / ATCOR (MODTRAN-5)• ENVI / FLAASH (MODTRAN-4)

– 6S?Second simulation of a satellite signal in the solar spectrum-vector@

• 4�hF����;¾(7M�w)*#$GH4R:%É�

• hF����;w¾(7M�w)*#$¼½�4�-.R/�$Ø(T>�E

FGHRopÉ��¾(�?@ksI�

�ebSCª�e

23

�?@k

JKK*

�?LMK*

NOK* NOP*

�?LMP*

��ÑÒ�)*

���QR°Ç�4 ��;�QR°Ç�4

dirI

difI

envI

srfR

difR

envR

24

�?@k

• S#%)*ô�

– Rsat EFw:%åæ�®0¯

� �envdifdir

envdifsat

envdifdir

srf

IIIRRR

IIIR

��

���

���

���

DN?ST�UV�z�

8bit: 0~255@

®0¯(Wstr-1m-2) )*ô

WEF�VAX> �?@kFSU

�?@kYZÊË�

25

�?@kFSUwI�|�b[�

– \-K(GH10(GH]$^

– �ù?(_`��aJ;m• bc�?FSU  Bd0ef(Bd0gf

• >¯?�FSU?GCM@�±�¸h?�ù?ö@

– iªË`Uö• Jj:% ey+bT_[���(,¸

– kl�7M��)*ô

:%K EF/��; GH10 GH]$^ ,Â[km]

1984/11/10 Landsat-4/MSS 31.5 150.9 151987/11/11 Landsat-5/MSS 31.8 151.8 151992/11/24 Landsat-5/Tm 27.8 150.8 13.232005/11/4 Terra/ASTER VNIR 37.5 163.8 13.18

2007/11/19 Terra/ASTER VNIR 33.0 162.7 39.892010/11/11 Terra/ASTER VNIR 35.1 162.5 24.11

,¾(��(mn(1�%op�:%¯�^_ÌDqrsR�%$

@k�Á�#$�b[�

26

�����EFGH

Landsat-4/MSS 1984/11/10 Landsat-5/TM 1992/11/24

�JAXA�JAXA

27

�����EFGH

Terra/ASTER 2010/11/11 Terra/ASTER 2010/5/17

����

op��

�ERSDAC�ERSDAC

28

NDVI�UQVW

1.0

-1.0Landsat-4/MSS1984/11/10

Terra/ASTER2007/11/19

NDVI

29

NDVI�UQVW

• =|�EFS��R�%$��V�XY�±²(1984�¼÷(��s*U#°%�Þ¢s�tw{$

• �öq|ÔUö�u��¾( 7��sI�

����3�NDVI���V�

���¾��v�NDV I= 0.0074 y

��7¾w�v�NDVI = 0.0015 y

���¾¹·v�NDVI = -0.0039 y

30