Upload
nijole
View
71
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Episodic and Source Memory in Autism. Tanuja Poorun MSc Research Methods Supervised by Prof. Paul W. Burgess With G. G. Yaacovi & H. Sugarman. Outline. Literature Review Hypotheses Participants Procedure Possible Results Questions. Remembering & Knowing. Awareness of Memory. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Episodic and Source Memory in Autism
Tanuja PoorunMSc Research Methods
Supervised by Prof. Paul W. BurgessWith G. G. Yaacovi & H. Sugarman
Outline
• Literature Review
• Hypotheses
• Participants
• Procedure
• Possible Results
• Questions
Remembering & Knowing
Awareness of Memory
Autonoetic Consciousness:
[Contextual details of previous events]
Remembering =
Episodic Memory
Noetic Consciousness:
[Abstract awareness of knowledge]
Knowing =
Semantic Memory
Episodic Memory (EM)
• Link between EM deficits and frontal lobe (FL) impairment– Patients with FL damage & those with schizophrenia
experience less “remembering”
• EM may require aspects of executive control – known cognitive deficits in ASD
• Possible impairment of autonoetic experience in adults with ASD– Evidence of EM deficits in adults with Asperger’s
syndrome (Bowler et al., 2000)
Source Memory (SM)
• Defined as ability to recollect contextual information about an event– Possibly a function of EM
• rPFC implicated in SM– See Figure 1 (Turner et al., 2008)
• Possible SM deficits in ASD– Evidence in adolescents & adults with Asperger’s
Syndrome (Bowler et al., 2004)
SM link to rPFC
Figure 1:
Regions of rPFC activated in critical contrasts.
Recollection of perceived/imagined and temporal source versus new items
(Turner et al., 2008)
Theory of Mind (ToM)
• Also known as “mentalising’: The cluster of abilities held to be necessary to understand the mental processes of others (Frith, 1997)
• ToM strongly associated with FL functioning– See Figure 2
• Evidence of impaired ToM in ASD– E.g false belief test
• Possible link to EM & SM deficits– Inability to reflect upon subjective experience & lack of
consciousness of own knowledge
ToM linked to PFL
Figure 2:
Location of peak activations in medial prefrontal regions during tasks where subjects think about their own or others' mental states (carried out by C. Frith, 1999)
Gateway Hypothesis
• Supervisory Attentional Gate (SAG) (Burgess et al., 2007)
– Supported by rPFC, approx. Brodmann’s Area 10– Functional sub-division of rPFC (see Fig. 3)– Mediates attentional switching between external stimuli
(stimulus-oriented, SO cases) and internal representations (stimulus-independent, SI cases)
• Atypical functioning of SAG in autism– fMRI: Atypical recruitment of rPFC in ASD (Gilbert et al., 2008)
– Impairments in mentalising (associated with mrPFC)– Impairments in attentional switching between SO & SI
Differential activation of rPFC
Figure 3: Differential activation of the rostromedial and rostrolateral PFC during attentional orientation to external and internal information, respectively. Center: Brain activation map showing significantly stronger activation of the anterior rostromedial PFC during the orientation of attention to external as compared to internal information (blue), and significantly stronger activation of the rostrolateral PFC during the orientation of attention to internal as compared to external information (red). (Henseler et al. 2010)
Central Coherence (CC) Theory
• Possible weak CC in ASD– Failure to integrate sources of information to establish
meaning– Possibly caused by atypical SAG– Disproportionate attentional focus on external stimuli at
expense of attention to internal representations
• May explain difficulties in retrieving subjective experiences in ASD, i.e. less ‘remembering” (EM) + difficulties in retrieving context in which information was encoded (SM)
Hypotheses
• HFA adults will show impairments in EM & SM
• Prospective Memory (PM) Task– PM deficits in ASD subjects who also show
impairments in EM & SM may contribute towards our understanding of the SAG.
Participants
• 40 participants in total– 20 HFA adults– 20 control
• IQ measures– National Adult Reading Test– Advanced Progressive Matrices
• Autism Questionnaire
Procedure
• Encoding Phase– Participants rate words according to Pleasant or
Unpleasant– Stimuli:
• 30 words (List A) obtained from MRC Linguistic Database• Neutral, high frequency, concrete, 4-7 letters long• E.g. Coat, Surf, Kitchen
– Responses recorded using arrow keys
Procedure
• Remember/Know Task– Adapted from Wheeler & Stuss (2003) memory
paradigm – Stimuli
• 60 words = 30 words from List A + 30 matched new words
– Participants required to determine if word comes from previous task (List A) or if word is new
Procedure
• Instructions for Remember/Know Task
Remember(Press Key 1)
Know(Press Key 2)
New Word(Press Key 3)
You recognise seeing the presented word during the previous task and can remember specific details about it (such as when the word occurred or what you thought about at the time).
You recognise the presented word but can not re-experience something specific that is related to that word (meaning that you simply know or you have a general feeling that it
occurred earlier).
You do not remember seeing the presented word and you think that it is new (meaning that it did not appear in the first task), or you are unsure whether you saw the word or not.
Procedure
Procedure
• Temporal Order Judgement Task– Adapted from Turner et al. (2008) source monitoring
paradigm– Stimuli:
• 60 words from FOILS 1 and 2
– Participants required to determine whether the presented word comes from the 1st R/K Task or the 2nd R/K Task.
– Responses recorded using arrow keys
Analysis
• Encoding Phase– Latencies & Pleasantness ratings
• Remember/Know Task– Latencies– Accuracy– Remember or Know responses
• Temporal Order Judgement Task– Latencies– Accuracy
Possible results
• Deficits in EM in ASD:– More “Remembering” than “Knowing” responses
• Deficits in SM in ASD:– Lower accuracy due to problems in retrieval of context-
specific information
References
• Bowler, D. M., Gardiner, J. M., Grice, S. J. (2000). Episodic Memory and Remembering in Adults with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30 (4), 295-304.
• Burgess, P.W., Dumontheil, I. & Gilbert, S.J. (2008). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (7), 290-298
• Frith, U. (1997). The neurocognitive basis of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1 (2), 73-77.
• Gilbert, S.J., Bird, G., Brindley, R., Frith, C.D. & Burgess, P.W. (2008). Atypical recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex in autism spectrum disorders: An fMRI study of two executive function tasks. Neuropsychologia, 46 (9), p2281-2291.
• Wheeler, M. A. & Stuss, D. T. (2003). Remembering and knowing in patients with frontal lobe injuries. Cortex, 39, 827-846
Questions?