Eng102 Analysis ClassicalArguments FA15

8/20/2019 Eng102 Analysis ClassicalArguments FA15

1/30

The Core of an Argument (Classical)

Analysis Writing


2/30

an argument in which you study the parts

of something to understand how it works,

what it means, or why it might be

significant

writer uses a principle or definition on the

basis of which an object, an event, or a

behavior can be divided into parts and

examined

many different analyses, but not all are

equally valid or useful

writer must convince the reader


3/30

writer’s challenge is to convince readers

that

(1) analytical tool being applied is

legitimate and well matched to the

object being studied

(2) analytical tool is being used

systematically to divide the object into

parts and to make a coherent,

meaningful statement about these pars

and the object as a whole


4/30

An analysis is a two-part argument

PART 1 – states and establishes the writer’s

agreement with a certain principle or

definition

◦Principle X or definition X) is valuable.

PART 2 – applies specific parts of the

principle or definition to the topic at hand

◦By applying principle or definition) X, we

can understand topic) as conclusion

based on analysis)


5/30

Introduction

state a problem

provide motivation to write/read

introduce author whose work will provide

principles for analysis

provide background information

thesis statement

Body Paragraphs

analysis proceeds

Conclusion

summary and conclusion provided

larger point is made


6/30

Don’t only write a summary

most common error

◦to succeed, must apply a principle or

definition and reach a conclusion about the

object, event, or behavior being examined

summary is part of analysis

summarize object or activity being

examined

summarize principle or definition being

applied


7/30

Make Analysis Systematic

once a principle or definition is presented, it

should be thoroughly and systematically

applied


8/30

Answer the “So What?” Question

readers should say “I never thought of _____

this way.”

Have you learned anything significant through

the analysis?

Pull together your related insights and explain

“how it all adds up.”


9/30

Attribute Sources Appropriately

work with only one source

apply insights from them to some object or

phenomenon you want to understand more

thoroughly

analysis derives mostly from YOUR application

of a principle or definition

take care to cite and quote as necessary


10/30


11/30

How is this clip an example of a classical

argument?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTX

Bebg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebg


12/30

Introduction

Attention grabber

◦ Memorable scene, illustrative story, startling

statistic

Explanation of issue and needed background

Thesis


13/30

Presentation of writer’s position

Main body of essay

◦ Presents & supports each reason in turn

◦ Each reason is tied to a value/belief held by the

audience


14/30

Summary of opposing views

Response to opposing views

Refutes opposing views

Shows weaknesses in opposing views

Concedes to some strengths


15/30

Conclusion

Summarizes argument

Leaves strong last impression

Calls for action or relates topic to larger

context of issues


16/30

Logos

Ethos

Pathos


17/30

Quality of message

Logic of argument

Guiding Questions:

◦ How can I make the argument internally consistent

and logical?

◦ How can I find the best reasons and support them

with the best evidence?


18/30

Credibility of writer

Conveyed through writer’s investment in

claim fairness to alternative views author’s

tone, style, attention to grammar and

mechanics

Guiding Questions:

◦ How can I present myself effectively?

◦ How can I enhance my credibility and

trustworthiness?


19/30

Values and beliefs of intended audience

Often associated with emotional appeal

◦ Imaginative sympathies

Guiding Questions:

◦ How can I make the reader open to my message?

◦ How can I best appeal to my reader’s values and

interests?

◦ How can I engage my reader emotionally and

imaginatively?


20/30

1. reasonable participants who operate within

the conventions of reasonable behavior

2. potentially sharable assumptions that can

serve as a starting place or foundation for

argument

If either factor is missing, the result is a

pseudo argument.


21/30

No possibility for listening, learning, growth,

or change by audience

Lack of shared assumptions or common

ground

◦ Bible interpretations

◦ Personal opinions

◦ Opera is boring

Pg. 65


22/30


argument?

What is the introduction? How is background

information provided? What is the thesis?

What arguments are made by Shakespeare?

What does Seuss say to refute his opponent?

How does Shakespeare respond to the opposing

views?

What is the ethos, logos, pathos?

What is the conclusion? What is the lasting

impression? What is the call for action or how is

the topic related to a larger context of issues?


23/30


argument?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTX

Bebg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3w2MTXBebg


24/30

View assigned videos

Answer given questions (slide 31)

Grammar Portfolio 1 due


25/30

Easter Bunny vs. Genghis Khan; Michael Jackson vs.

Elvis Presley

Ventrice, Kyle, De’Maun, Sean, Ryan

Batman vs. Sherlock Holmes; Steve Jobs vs. Bill Gates

Kylee, Jenna, Min, Carrie, Ciara,

Steven Hawking vs. Einstein; Mr. Rogers vs. Mr. T

Robin, Mariah, Erin, Sarah, Kayla, Jessica

Moses vs. Santa; Mario Bros. vs. Wright Bros.

Tim, Charles, Brian D., Chris, Scott, Brian M.


26/30

Provide DETAILED answers to these questions

for EACH video assigned to you.

1. Which character had the best argument? Who

do you think won?

2. What were some of the arguments made by

the winner?

3. How did the winner refute his opponent’s

arguments?

4. What were some of the opponent’s key

arguments?

5. Identify the persuasive appeals of ethos,

logos, pathos.


27/30

Introduction

Locate an Analytical Principle

◦summarize the key definition or principle

that forms the basis of the analysis

use 2 specific reading strategies to

identify principles and definitions in

source materials

Look for a sentence that makes a

general statement about the way

something works

Look for statements that take this form:

X can be defined as A, B, and C

in other words find the article’s thesis


28/30

Introduction

Formulate a thesis

◦ Second part of argument

◦main idea of analytical paper

By applying principle or definition) X, we can

understand topic) as conclusion based on

analysis).

fill in 1st

blank with specific object, event, or

behavior you are examining

fill in 2

nd

blank with your conclusion about the

meaning or significance of this object, based on

insights you made during your analysis.


29/30

Body

These statements will help to ANALYZE

TOOL’S STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

◦What is the validity of this principle or

definition?

◦Are they accurate?

◦Are they well accepted?

◦Do you accept them?

◦What are the arguments used against them?

◦What are their limitations?


30/30

Conclusion

◦summary of argument and conclusion

provided

◦larger point is made

Documents

Eng102 Analysis ClassicalArguments FA15