Upload
balakrishnabatta
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
1/24
ENERGY EFFICIENT CMOS FULL-ADDERS
FOR ARTHMETIC APPLICATIONS
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
2/24
Overview
Objective Existing Logic Scheme
Pass Transistor logic
Complementary PassTransistor Logic Proposed Logic System
Advantages
Applications Tools used
References
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
3/24
Objective
We proposed the design and performancecomparison of Full-Adder cells implementedwith alternative logic structure.
The resultant Full-Adders shown to be moreefficient on regards of power , area and delay
consumption , when compared with the otherones reported previously to build low-powerarithmetic modules.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
4/24
Existing Logic Schemes
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
5/24
Pass transistor
Transistors can be used as switches
g
s d
g
s d
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
6/24
Pass transistors
Transistors can be used as switches
g
s d
g = 0
s d
g = 1
s d
0 strong 0
Input Output
1 degraded 1
g
s d
g = 0
s d
g = 1
s d
0 degraded 0
Input Output
strong 1
g = 1
g = 1
g = 0
g = 0
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
7/24
a) XOR function implemented with pass-transistor circuit.
b)Karnaough map showing derivation of the XOR function
0 10
1
0 1
B
A
1 0
A
A
B
B
F
F
B B
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
8/24
Cont.
The PTL is the most popular for Low Power digitalcircuits.
The main advantages of PTL over othertraditional CMOS design is
I. High speed due to low node capacitance.
II. Low power dissipation, as a result of reduced no
of transistors.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
9/24
Cont
Problems in PTL:
I. Slow operation at the reduced power supply
as the threshold voltage drop across the
single channel pass transistor results in low
drive current.
II. The high input voltage level at the
regenerative inverter is not Vdd , the PMOS
device in the inverter is not fully turned OFFand hence direct path static power
dissipation is significant.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
10/24
Cont
Threshold voltage dropat the output of the
pass-transistor gate
Voltage drop does notexceed Vth when there
are multiple transistors
in the path
A
B=Vdd
B
Fmax
=Vdd-V
th
A=Vdd
Vth
+
-
Cout
Vdd
Vdd
Fmax
=Vdd-V
th
Cout
Vth
+
-
Vth
+
-
Vdd
(a) (b)
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
11/24
Cont
Elimination of the threshold voltage drop by:(a) pairing nMOS transistor with a pMOS
(b) using a swing-restoring inverter
A=0V
In=Vdd
Fmax
=Vdd
A=Vdd
Vth
+
-
Cout
Vdd
Vdd
Cin
Vth
+
-
(a) (b)
+
-V
dd
ON
+Vdd
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
12/24
Complementary Pass Transistor Logic
(CPL)
The complexity of full CMOS pass gate logic
can be reduced dramatically by adopting
another circuit called CPL.
The main idea behind CPL is to use a purely
NMOS pass transistor network for the
operations, instead of CMOS TG(Transmission
Gate) network.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
13/24
Cont
All inputs are applied in complementary form
i.e every input signals and its inverse must be
provided.
The circuit also produces complementary
output, to be used by subsequent CPL stages.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
14/24
Cont
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
15/24
Cont.
Advantages:
I. The elimination of PMOS transistors from the
pass-gate network significantly reduces the
parasitic capacitance associated with each
node in the circuit, thus operation speed is
typically higher compared to full CMOS
counter part .
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
16/24
Proposed System
GDI
GDI(Gate Diffusion Input) is a novel technique for lowpower digital circuits design in an embedded system.
This technique allows reduction in power consumption,
delay and area of the circuit.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
17/24
Cont
This technique can be used to reduce the
number of transistors when compared
conventional CMOS design.
The performance of GDI is compared with
CMOS and different other design techniques
for several digital circuits.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
18/24
BASIC GDI CELL
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
19/24
Cont
Some modifications in the standard CMOS
inverter derives the basic GDI cell.
The sources of NMOS and PMOS are fed by
input signals.
GDI cell consists of three input terminals G,P
and N.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
20/24
Cont
In this the source of PMOS is not connected to
VDD and the source of NMOS is not connected
to GND.
This feature gives the GDI cell two extra input
pins to use which makes GDI design more
flexible than an usual CMOS design.
To be more specific the GDI requires twin-well
CMOS or silicon on insulator(SOI) to implant.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
21/24
Cont The various functions that can be
implemented with GDI cell, which consists of
only two transistors is as shown below.
S.No N P G Output Function
1. 0 B A AB F1
2. B 1 A A+B F2
3. 1 B A A+B OR
4. B 0 A AB AND
5. C B A AB+AC MUX
6. 0 1 A A NOT
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
22/24
Tools Used
The DSCH program is a logic editor and
simulator which is used to validate the
architecture of the logic circuit before the
microelectronics design is started.
DSCH design entry and simulation software
provide a complete and cost effective design
solution custom IC design.
Tanner Tools.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
23/24
References
1 . A. Morgenshtein, A. Fish, I.A. Wagner, Gate-Diffusion Input (GDI)- APower Efficient Method for Digital combinatorial circuits, IEEETransactions on VLSI Systems, vol.10, no.5, October 2002.
2 . A. Morgenshtein, I. Shwartz, A. Fish, Gate Diffusion Input
(GDI) Logic in Standard CMOS Nanoscale Process, 2010IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Engineers in Israel.
3 . S. Fisher, A. Teman, D. Vaysman, A. Gertsman, O.Y.Pecht, A. Fish, Ultra-Low Power Subthreshold Flip-Flop Design, IEEE International Symposium
on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2009.
4 . K.Roy, S.Prasad, Low-Power CMOS VLSI Circuit Design, Wiley India2009.
7/30/2019 Energy Efficient Cmos Full-Adders for Arthmetic Applications
24/24
Cont
[5]A. M. Shams and M. Bayoumi, Performance evaluation of 1-bitCMOS adder cells, in Proc. IEEE ISCAS, Orlando, FL, May 1999,
vol. 1, pp. 2730.
[6] N. Weste and K. Eshraghian, Principles of CMOS VLSI Design, A
System Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988, ch. 5.
[7] K. M. Chu and D. Pulfrey, A comparison of CMOS circuit techniques:
Differential cascode voltage switch logic versus conventional logic,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-22, no. 4, pp. 528532, Aug.1987.
[8] K. Yano, K. Yano, T. Yamanaka, T. Nishida, M. Saito, K. Shimohigashi,
and A. Shimizu, A 3.8 ns CMOS 16 16-b multiplier usingcomplementary pass-transistor logic, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol.25, no. 2, pp. 388395, Apr. 1990.
[9] M. Suzuki, M. Suzuki, N. Ohkubo, T. Shinbo, T. Yamanaka, A.
Shimizu, K. Sasaki, and Y. Nakagome, A 1.5 ns 32-b CMOS ALUin double pass-transistor logic, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28,no. 11, pp. 11451150, Nov.1993.