Click here to load reader
Upload
doanquynh
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This article was downloaded by: [Dr Kenneth Shapiro]On: 09 June 2015, At: 07:03Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK
Journal of Applied AnimalWelfare SciencePublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/haaw20
“Primatology” Panel DiscussionKate Baker a , Terry L. Maple b , V. Wensley Koch c &Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf da Tulane National Primate Research Center ,Covington, Louisianab School of Psychology. Georgia Institute ofTechnologyc Animal Care, Animal and Plant Health InspectionService, U.S. Department of Agriculture , Loveland,Coloradod Lincoln Park Zoo's Lester E. Fisher Center forthe Study and Conservation of Apes, Universityof Chicago Committee on Evolutionary Biology ,Chicago, IllinoisPublished online: 11 Aug 2010.
To cite this article: Kate Baker , Terry L. Maple , V. Wensley Koch & Elizabeth V.Lonsdorf (2007) “Primatology” Panel Discussion, Journal of Applied Animal WelfareScience, 10:1, 83-86, DOI: 10.1080/10888700701277733
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888700701277733
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Dr
Ken
neth
Sha
piro
] at
07:
04 0
9 Ju
ne 2
015
“Primatology” Panel Discussion
Kate BakerTulane National Primate Research Center
Covington, Louisiana
Terry L. MapleSchool of Psychology
Georgia Institute of Technology
V. Wensley KochAnimal Care, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Loveland, Colorado
Elizabeth V. LonsdorfLincoln Park Zoo’s Lester E. Fisher Center
for the Study and Conservation of Apes
Chicago, Illinois and
University of Chicago Committee on Evolutionary Biology
Editor’s Note
In some cases, questions and answers have been edited for space reasons. In other
cases, questions and answers may be incomplete because of transcription difficul-
ties. However, other than these omissions, nothing was changed in the transcrip-
tion of the panel discussions.
Question: Our main scientists … are very resistant to accepting new ideas. …
We were wondering if you have any ideas. …
Baker: What you need to do is provide them with some evidence that would be
of some importance to them in a handout … for instance … the frequency of
self-injurious behavior … how that could impact their project. The role that your
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 10(1), 83–86Copyright © 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Correspondence should be sent to Kate Baker, TNPRC, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington,
LA 70433. Email: [email protected]
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Dr
Ken
neth
Sha
piro
] at
07:
04 0
9 Ju
ne 2
015
IACUC [institutional animal care and use committee] is playing at your facility is
really key. …
Maple: Steve Schapiro said you got to convince them with data. I’m old
enough to remember when IACUCs started, and the first one I sat on at Davis,
when the first Animal Care Committee started there, the scientists doing their work
did not want to have any kind of interference that would somehow change the pu-
rity and the control in the experiment, and what broke the ice—and I want to be
candid about this—was beer. We started talking to each other. … The American
Society of Primatologists, which was founded by both field types and lab types and
a lot of primate veterinarians, was one of those places where we stopped being ad-
versaries and a certain trust began to build up, so I think it’s evidence but it’s also
trust, and you may want to get to know those folks a little better, and they need to
get to know you, and it may be a primate social process here that’s getting in the
way of your success.
Question: I have a question about baselines. I do understand the scientific im-
portance of them, and I do understand how difficult it is to evaluate changes in for-
est patch or bushmeat or anything without some baseline data. … I’m not sure if
we’re ever going to get the kind of data that we need before we have to make the
hard decisions. …
Lonsdorf: Well, I’ve thought about that a lot, and I’ve talked to people a lot
about it, and I think you’re absolutely right, and sometimes there is an urgency, and
other times, there are populations that are relatively protected, but the country
where they’re in wants to do more … for example, they’ve talked in different
places about adding corridors between forested areas and things like that, and I’d
like to say that the first thing you should do, I think, is to do no harm. We know that
protecting big swaths of forest is good, so we should start with that, but when you
get to the nitty-gritty of “should we put a corridor in here?” I think you really need
to evaluate if you’re really creating more habitat for a group or you’re creating
more sink, and those are the types of things that are more nitty-gritty that I think …
as Terry was saying, I think behaviorists need to be brought to the table in some of
these discussions and say “hey, look, just because you put a half-mile-wide corri-
dor on this thing between these two forest patches, it doesn’t mean gorillas are go-
ing to go in there,” and I think that’s the point I was trying to make. Certainly, make
the big actions of just setting aside forest, but when you come into discussions of
where and what and how to do it, I think it’d be really a help to include behavioral
data in that.
Question: How can we encourage zoos to recognize that animal behavior is just
as important to welfare and well being as having a vet on staff—or keepers … ?
84 BAKER, MAPLE, KOCH, LONSDORF
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Dr
Ken
neth
Sha
piro
] at
07:
04 0
9 Ju
ne 2
015
Maple: Speak out. That’s what I’m trying to do is to be as forceful as I can in
speaking out. As you know, I, for a number of years, have been fortunate to recruit
a lot of talent, and in training them and sending them—many of them—to zoos as
“scientific curators,” because that’s where the opportunities are. I wish I could say
there were more research opportunities, but there’re not, but I think these are the
foot soldiers of change. It’s almost better to put them in curatorial slots. Some of
these students are rising to the top now. They’re going to leadership positions, and
they will have an opportunity to change things, but I’m afraid that it’s my zoo di-
rector colleagues where the problem is. There’s a lot of resistance—you talk about
the IACUC resistance. I believe there’s a very strong resistance to science. It is last
in the zoological garden, as Hediger said many years ago, and I just remember
what Steve said. He really inspired me today. We gotta prove it. We gotta prove that
science is essential. We gotta prove that these young animal behaviorists are criti-
cal, and I think it’ll take rapport between our other colleagues—the veterinarians,
the curators. I believe a lot of curators are resisting this, because they see y’all as
competitors for the expertise in the zoo, so it’s a tough problem, and I’m really
sorry to say to you that, after 30 years, looking back on what I thought would hap-
pen—as much as has happened, and a lot has happened to be happy about—not
nearly enough has happened. There aren’t nearly enough people … most of you
animal behaviorists, you probably never thought about your local zoo in recent
years, but I believe that zoos right now have more influence over the public’s un-
derstanding or perception of animal behavior than the Animal Behavior Society
has, and if that’s true, and if what the signals that we’re sending and the informa-
tion we’re putting out there isn’t good enough, it’s because we don’t have enough
of you working with us, so I hope that will change, but I really am proud of all of
you that are out there who are changing the face of zoos and reinventing them.
Koch: Let me add a comment on that … for those of you who haven’t heard of
the organization called Animal Behavior Management Alliance, it’s a group of
people that are doing … positive reinforcement training with their animals. There
are some very good card-carrying behaviorists that head it up, and the majority of
that organization is made up of keepers, and they are learning how to do this with
their animals, and the keepers will come in and give talks on what they have done,
and some of it is totally incredible.
Question: … How much is known about disease epidemics in other primates or
other animals in large social groups? Is there something about apes that makes them
more susceptible?
Lonsdorf: There’s a special topics issue of AJP coming out this month, of dis-
ease risk analysis studies in primates, and there’s a variety of primates represented,
but the basic answer is, in the primates where there’s less resistance to getting your
hands on them, they actually know quite a bit. There’s been a lot of great studies of
“PRIMATOLOGY” DISCUSSION 85
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Dr
Ken
neth
Sha
piro
] at
07:
04 0
9 Ju
ne 2
015
the temple macaques, the temple monkeys that sit there and get fed by tourists, and
then tourists get bit and scratched, and they’ve got really good measures of disease
risk transmission there. The theory is debated, and I’m not a veterinarian—I just
actually hang out with them—so don’t really quote me on this, but to them a pri-
mate is a primate is a primate, and great apes shouldn’t be all that much more sus-
ceptible to getting human diseases, but the problem is that there just haven’t been
really good studies that have documented transmission events. There’s some good
work being done by the mountain gorilla veterinary group that have showed simi-
lar pathogens in the gorillas and the humans around the park, but they don’t know
if that’s just from sharing an environment, and the problem is really being able to
have good assessment techniques for pathogens from noninvasively collected
samples or having good quality necropsies. I can’t tell you how many study sites
either don’t do a necropsy, don’t do one that covers all the organ systems—and
then, they sit on a dusty table out in the field house and never get sent anywhere for
testing.
… In the 46-year history of Gombe, they’ve immobilized an animal 4 times, and
one was recently—a young male named Faustino that had some very strange and
alarming symptoms, and we got a blood sample from him. We sent it everywhere
we could think of to get tested, and he came up showing antibodies for a lot of stuff,
and so I take it to our vets and say “what does this mean?”, and they say “well,
what’s a normal blood sample from a wild chimp look like”? We’ve no idea. We
don’t have that data, so we don’t know if what Faustino’s showing antibodies to is
just part of being a normal wild chimp or not, ’cause there’s just very little data on
that still.
86 BAKER, MAPLE, KOCH, LONSDORF
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Dr
Ken
neth
Sha
piro
] at
07:
04 0
9 Ju
ne 2
015