Upload
darren-lane
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Electronic Systems Support
Electronics Pool
Status & EvolutionChris Parkman, November 7, 2002
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
2
Agenda
ESS Group overview Electronics Pool status LHC Common Electronics Support -
“LECS” Electronics Pool evolution Conclusions
Electronic Systems Support
ESS Group
An overview
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
4
ESS Group’s Mission
Support for electronics systems (primarily for the LHC experiments) User consultation and logistics Contacts with industry Equipment purchase Quality control Repair and maintenance
Participation in common developments together with the LHC experiments, other support groups and projects.
Management and operation the Electronics Pool
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
5
ESS Personnel – Oct 2002
Staff Electronics Engineers - 1.2 (3) Applied Physicists - 2 Technicians - 6.4 (7) Project Associate (applied physicist) - 1 Technical Student - 1 Storekeeper - 1
Industrial Support Technicians - 3 IS Administrators - 2 IS Database Engineer - 1
Total 18.6 (21) FTE
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
6
Group Leader
Chris Parkman
ELECTRONICS INFRASTRUCTURE
SECTION
Section LeaderPaul Maley
Bruno AllongueAndrew BillingtonGerard Brouant
Philippe FontaineMartin GastalVincent Pittin
Geraldine Thomas
USER SERVICES SECTION
Section LeaderCatherine Moine
Alain GuyMike Koratzinos
James RouetBertrand Smaniotto
Douglas TserkezoglouAlbert Zimmer
PROJECTS & ACTIVITIES
Sophie Baron (ATLAS TRT TTC)Mike Clayton (GIF)
Luciano Periale (GIF)Gilbert Dumont (LHC Crates)
Markus Joos (ATLAS DAQ/DIG)
Group Secretary
Evelyne Dho
Staff membersFellows, students, associates Industrial support
ESS Organisation
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
7
ESS Group
Recent retirements & reassignments – have lead to a loss of expertise in essential “core” areasFront-end equipmentHigh VoltageMechanics
Electronic Systems Support
Electronics Pool Status
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
9
Rationale
Circulation of widely used items Source of readily available equipment Availability of specialised measurement
equipment Remark
The Electronics Pool has been (mis)used to supply equipment for long-term use or as a convenient source of funding for experiments or other activities
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
10
Finance
The Pool is financed by rental charges with a contribution from CERN
The rental fee covers Overheads
• Maintenance & verification (outsourced) • Administration (2 IS staff)• Provision of spares - minimum stock
New investment CERN covers
ESS staff for technical & logistical support (~6 FTE) Offices, labs & workshops
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
11
The Electronics Pool Today
~30,000 items Modular electronics Measurement instruments Electronics infrastructure
• Subracks• Power supplies
Total (accounting) value 2001 >81 MCHF
Transactions 2001 >6’000 (individual items in or out)
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
12
LEP6%
Other6%
LHC35%
Fixed Target30%
Div13%
Heavy Ion10%
Users - end 2001
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
13
Technical Profile(by quantity)
Front end54%
Crates17%
Testers & tools12%
Processors & interfaces
6%Others
3%High Voltage
8%
Total: 29,365
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
14
Testers & tools, 12.8
High Voltage, 7.6
Processors & interfaces, 4.2
Others, 0.7
Front end, 38.2
Crates, 18
Technical Profile(by value MCHF)
Total value: 81.5MCHF
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
15
Electronics Pool Oct. 2002
Type Number Value Av. value
Front-end modules 15’789 38’210’611 2’420
Crate components 4’977 17’985’513 3’614
Tools – scopes, analysers 3’630 12’818’732 3’513
High voltage equipment 2’474 2’308’396 3’053
Processors & interfaces, etc.
1’648 4’203’097 2’550
Others 847 710’188 838
TOTAL 29’365 81’554’003 2’777
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
16
Pool Accounts 2001
CHFProp. of total
incomeProp. of total
value*
Income from Rental 2’506’138
Other income 147’560
Total income 2’653’698 3.32%
Maintenance -283’622 10.7% 0.35%
Manpower -192’925 7.2% 0.24%
Total overheads -476’547 17.9% 0.59%
Disposable income 2’177’151 2.69%
New equipment 2’033’022
* Total value = 81MCHF
Return on investment
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
17
Income & OverheadsAbsolute
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
MC
HF
Manpower Maintenance Total income
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
18
Income & OverheadsRelative
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Manpower Maintenance Total income
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
19
Occupancy
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
20
00
Q1
20
00
Q2
20
00
Q3
20
00
Q4
20
01
Q1
20
01
Q2
20
01
Q3
20
01
Q4
20
02
Q1
20
02
Q2
Occ
up
ancy
%
Global FE Crate components Proc & intf Testers & tools HV
Occupancy – proportion of total time rented
What does low occupancy indicate: too many or wrong
types?
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
20
Purchase Profile
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
10001
98
9
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
Qu
anti
ty p
urc
has
ed
Global FE Crates Proc & intf Testers & tools HV
Much of the Pool’s equipment was
purchased prior to 1989
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
21
Rental Profile - Example
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Age (years)
Rel
ativ
e re
nta
l
Lifetime5 years
Cancelledat 15 years
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
22
Compensation (Resale) Value
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10
Age (Years)
Rela
tive v
alu
e
Lifetime(5 years)
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
23
Responsibilities
Overall responsibilityEP-ESS GL (as before)
OperationsCatherine Moine
Technical policy & financeChris Parkman
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
24
Organisation
OperationsCatherine
Moine
CERN/EP ManagementDR, EP-DL, EP-DDL,
EP-DPO
Users
FinanceChris
Parkman
Technical Policy
Chris Parkman
ELECTRONICS POOL
EP-ESS GL
EPTAB
Electronics Advisory Board
EP-ESSGROUP
Electronic Systems Support
LHC Electronics Common Support“LECS”
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
26
“LECS”
R.Cashmore’s Memo - 22 Feb 2000 Stated aims – “EP Electronics Pool Policy”
Centralised purchasing & maintenance• “All CERN electronics purchases to be made
via the Pool”• With 5% surcharge for maintenance
Value-added service that guarantees that the large investment in electronics at CERN is well maintained and obtained at the lowest cost
Services to be offered by “The Pool” Purchasing Maintenance Evaluation Pool instruments [rental service]
LHC Electronics Common Support “LECS”
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
27
Some Reflections
Increasing use of ESS support implies increasing resources
Will all the expertise needed be available? “The client specifies the equipment to be purchased
and the Pool’s expertise is available for consultation” Support surcharge
5% “…covers the cost of verification and repair of the equipment, as well as spares…”
• 3%/year for three years to purchase 10% common spares
• 2%/year for maintenance and support Does not scale easily
• 1 Industrial Support = 100kCHF p.a. which 2MCHF business
The reality is contracts with fixed price for repair
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
28
Status of 5% Support Scheme
Scheme is little used, with no obvious further demand Existing use
Qty Unit Cost (CHF)
2% p.a.(CHF)
Annual revenue (CHF)
ELMB 60 200* 4 240
TTCvi 80 1’750 35 2’800
TTCvx 30 900 18 540
TTCrm 25 300* 6 150
TOTAL 3’730
* Treat as consumables via CERN stores?
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
29
Conclusions
Strict application of LECS is unrealistic Manpower a major problemUnable to grow to meet implied
requirements Apply a case by case approach
Based on available manpower
Electronic Systems Support
Electronics Pool Evolution
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
31
What is happening?
Reduction in rental revenue CERN economies Reduced scientific programme
• LHC only – no fixed target No beams in 2005
• What to do? Changing technical requirements
~LHC experiments only Comments heard
The rental fee is too high… Leasing would be attractive…
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
32
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Inco
me (
appro
x.)
MCH
FPredicted Income 2002-2007
External accounts contribute ~45% to the total Pool rental
income
Special conditions for 2005?
??
Overheads 18%
Overheads ~35%
?
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
33
What is needed?
“Right-size” the Pool Ensure technical quality Refine procedures
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
34
Right-Size
Reduce stock Generic cuts, not specific Ensure technical relevance Achieve a coherent technical profile
Identify “product lines” - examples Test beam support Support of development & design
• High-performance measurement equipment• Inventory of equipment at CERN?
Maintain financial viability Technical profile and rental conditions must allow the
income necessary to fund Pool operation and equipment renewal
Modelling in progress What effect will cuts have?
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
35
Modelling - Revenue Profile
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700<
1
1-2
2-5
5-1
0
10
-20
20
-30
30
-40
40
-50
50
-60
Annual Revenue (kCHF)
No
. ite
ms
/ T
ota
l An
nu
al R
ev
en
ue
(k
CH
F)
Number Total Annual Revenue
~650 items each with an annual revenue <1kCHF contribute only
110kCHF to the total revenue
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
36
Ensure Technical Quality
Consistent evaluation & verification Quality control before purchase & in service Well designed procedures available to users
Correctly tested equipment The Pool must guarantee the proper
functioning of equipment Utility & reputation of the Pool
User help & consultation
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
37
Refine Procedures - 1
Enhance visibility & transparency of technical choices Electronics Pool Technical Advisory Board -
EPTAB Improve contacts with users
Historical rental issues Operational & technical information
• User’s Guide• Web site• On-line technical documentation
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
38
Refine Procedures - 2
Improve efficiency Avoid special cases & exceptions Direct service for urgent requirements Material Requests via EDH, as for stores
Database management Move to BAAN “Company 400” (CERN
stores) Full integration with CERN procedures Collaboration with Stores & PC Shop (A lot) more support from AS Division
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
39
EPTAB - Electronics Pool Technical Advisory Board
Group of experienced engineers and physicists to advise ESS-GL onTechnical profileChoice of equipment
AimsAdapt Pool to users’ needsSpend reduced income wiselyEnsure visibility, transparency
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
40
EPTAB Membership
Engineers or experimental physicists Current experience in
the application and use of modern electronics & instruments
Representatives from the LHC experiments & other activities With a broad view of
CERN’s needs
Jan Buytaert (LHCb) Augusto Ceccucci
(NA48, EAB) Magnus Hansen (CMS) Luciano Musa (ALICE) Georges Schuler
(ATLAS) Chris Parkman
(EP-ESS GL, Chairman) Catherine Moine
(EP-ESS, Pool operations)
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
41
EPTAB First Meeting
Round tableAgreement on need to “right-size”Agreement on need to establish
coherent “product lines”Agreement on need to ensure the
financial viability of the Pool
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
42
Leasing
“Leasing” – the supply of equipment with guaranteed (long) term support services and a gradual pay-back leading to user ownership (“hire purchase with support”)
Leasing is not possible without an injection of funds
Nov
embe
r 7,
200
2E
lect
roni
cs A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd
43
Conclusions
Rental The Electronics Pool must be
• Able to supply relevant equipment in adequate quantities• Correctly funded & economically viable• Able to assure the quality of the equipment
LECS Difficult to implement Not popular On-hold
Future A coherent technical and financial plan is needed as soon
as possible• Input from users (EPTAB, EAB)• Policy guidance from EP management• Work underway