3
Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesions Simona Fiori , 1 Martin Staudt, 2,3 Roslyn N. Boyd, 4 and Andrea Guzzetta 1,5 1 Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, Italy 2 University Childrens Hospital, Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, University of Tübingen, Germany 3 Clinic for Neuropediatrics and Neurorehabilitation, Epilepsy Centre for Children and Adolescents, Schön Klinik Vogtareuth, Germany 4 Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, UQ Child Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 5 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Correspondence should be addressed to Simona Fiori; s.[email protected] Received 10 April 2019; Accepted 10 April 2019; Published 2 May 2019 Copyright © 2019 Simona Fiori et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In the past decades, interest has grown on the mechanisms of early brain plasticity and their implications for newborns and infants with brain damage. Early brain damage triggers com- plex processes of adaptive neuroplasticity, which involve var- ious functional systems and are highly inuenced by the environment. Understanding the complex process of reorga- nization of neural functions through adaptive plasticity is a fast-growing eld of research that has the potential to prompt more targeted and evidence-based interventions to promote neurodevelopment. The objective of this special issue was to collect scientic reports and literature reviews, from both animal models and human studies, contributing to a better understanding of the characteristics of early adaptive neuro- plasticity following early brain damage. Understanding in vivo mechanisms of damage and plasticity needs animal models. Unilateral brain damage is probably the most studied model for the characterization of brain plasticity. The review by M. Gennaro et al. is aimed at exploring developmental ischemic stroke pathophysiological mechanisms, focusing on key factors contributing to neona- tal brain vulnerability and summarizing current available stroke models in animal labs. These models are highly infor- mative to human studies, as they identify mechanisms of neuroplasticity in controlled experimental conditions often using invasive means of investigation. Fortunately, noninva- sive neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques are now widely available and make it possible to describe the specicity of early mechanisms also in humans. Evidence of early plasticity was found, for example, by C. Simon-Martinez et al. who explored determinants of impaired upper limb sensory and motor functions and corti- cospinal tract wiring by using transcranial magnetic stimula- tion and related this to lesion topography as assessed by a visual semiquantitative scale for brain lesion severity on MRI in CP. In an innovative ultra-high-eld MRI technique, S. Fiori et al. explored the plasticity of sensory systems in young adults with congenital brain lesions. Their ndings support the crucial role of topography of brain damage and reorganized somatosensory areas in relation to decits of hand sensory and possibly motor function. In another study, S. S. Geertsen et al. explored the electrophysiological mecha- nisms of coactivation of muscles and high step-to-step vari- ability of gait in adults with early brain lesion and CP, which are the result of a long learning process involving pre- dictive coding of the sensory consequences of movement. Indeed, dierent factors interact with brain adaptive plas- ticity potentials, inuencing the natural history of cerebral palsy in the rst years. To understand these mechanisms, K. Klingels et al. collected longitudinal functional data over a 5-year time period in children with unilateral CP. They observed increasing limitations in the passive range of motion and improvement in capacity measures, while the Hindawi Neural Plasticity Volume 2019, Article ID 9154282, 2 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9154282

Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesionsdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/np/2019/9154282.pdf · 2019-07-30 · Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesions

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    14

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesionsdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/np/2019/9154282.pdf · 2019-07-30 · Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesions

HindawiNeural PlasticityVolume 2019, Article ID 9154282, 2 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9154282

EditorialNeural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesions

Simona Fiori ,1 Martin Staudt,2,3 Roslyn N. Boyd,4 and Andrea Guzzetta 1,5

1Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, Italy2University Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, University of Tübingen, Germany3Clinic for Neuropediatrics and Neurorehabilitation, Epilepsy Centre for Children and Adolescents,Schön Klinik Vogtareuth, Germany4Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, UQ Child Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine,The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia5Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Simona Fiori; [email protected]

Received 10 April 2019; Accepted 10 April 2019; Published 2 May 2019

Copyright © 2019 Simona Fiori et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the past decades, interest has grown on the mechanisms ofearly brain plasticity and their implications for newborns andinfants with brain damage. Early brain damage triggers com-plex processes of adaptive neuroplasticity, which involve var-ious functional systems and are highly influenced by theenvironment. Understanding the complex process of reorga-nization of neural functions through adaptive plasticity is afast-growing field of research that has the potential to promptmore targeted and evidence-based interventions to promoteneurodevelopment. The objective of this special issue wasto collect scientific reports and literature reviews, from bothanimal models and human studies, contributing to a betterunderstanding of the characteristics of early adaptive neuro-plasticity following early brain damage.

Understanding in vivo mechanisms of damage andplasticity needs animal models. Unilateral brain damage isprobably the most studied model for the characterization ofbrain plasticity. The review by M. Gennaro et al. is aimed atexploring developmental ischemic stroke pathophysiologicalmechanisms, focusing on key factors contributing to neona-tal brain vulnerability and summarizing current availablestroke models in animal labs. These models are highly infor-mative to human studies, as they identify mechanisms ofneuroplasticity in controlled experimental conditions oftenusing invasive means of investigation. Fortunately, noninva-sive neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques are

now widely available and make it possible to describe thespecificity of early mechanisms also in humans.

Evidence of early plasticity was found, for example, byC. Simon-Martinez et al. who explored determinants ofimpaired upper limb sensory and motor functions and corti-cospinal tract wiring by using transcranial magnetic stimula-tion and related this to lesion topography as assessed by avisual semiquantitative scale for brain lesion severity onMRI in CP. In an innovative ultra-high-field MRI technique,S. Fiori et al. explored the plasticity of sensory systems inyoung adults with congenital brain lesions. Their findingssupport the crucial role of topography of brain damage andreorganized somatosensory areas in relation to deficits ofhand sensory and possibly motor function. In another study,S. S. Geertsen et al. explored the electrophysiological mecha-nisms of coactivation of muscles and high step-to-step vari-ability of gait in adults with early brain lesion and CP,which are the result of a long learning process involving pre-dictive coding of the sensory consequences of movement.

Indeed, different factors interact with brain adaptive plas-ticity potentials, influencing the natural history of cerebralpalsy in the first years. To understand these mechanisms, K.Klingels et al. collected longitudinal functional data over a5-year time period in children with unilateral CP. Theyobserved increasing limitations in the passive range ofmotion and improvement in capacity measures, while the

Page 2: Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesionsdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/np/2019/9154282.pdf · 2019-07-30 · Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesions

2 Neural Plasticity

spontaneous use of the impaired limb in bimanual tasksbecame less effective after the age of 9 years.

Evolution of upper limb function in children with unilat-eral CP and the factors that influence these time trends canprovide guidance in delineating treatment priorities. Theeffects of new treatment options have recently been the objectof growing interest. For example, E. Inguaggiato et al. foundan increase in unilateral hemiparetic hand function (manualdexterity) in children and young adults with unilateral CP,with improvements emerging immediately at the end oftranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and persistingfor at least 90 minutes. The action observation network(AON) was studied by G. Sgandurra et al. in children withunilateral CP. They demonstrated similarities compared toAON in typically developing children and propose an AONparadigm to explain and predict the efficacy of rehabilitationin unilateral CP children and to investigate the effects of plas-ticity induced by specific rehabilitation programs. They alsodemonstrated that a more lateralized AON corresponded toa worse impaired hand performance, as an example of mal-adaptive plasticity. In another paper, T. L. Rich et al. appliedtranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an opportu-nity to open a window for plasticity in unilateral CP, showingthat a single application of anodal tDCS over the affected M1can improve, in a safe and feasible way, possible but inconsis-tent gains in hand function.

Of course, neural plasticity has not only implications inthe organization of motor and somatosensory function.Visual deficits, for example, are increasingly recognized asbeing part of the clinical picture in most cases. Confirmationcomes from the paper of G. Ickx et al. who explored visuo-spatial attention in unilateral CP and demonstrated clinicaldifferences according to the laterality of brain and lesion tim-ing: children with corticosubcortical lesions more frequentlypresented visuospatial attention deficits than children withperiventricular brain lesion, which might be the results ofimpacted function or plasticity mechanisms.

Conflicts of Interest

The editors declare that they have no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this special issue.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors who contributed tothis special issue. This publication would not be possiblewithout the participation of our expert reviewers, who pro-vided vital constructive feedback and criticism throughoutthe review process.

Simona FioriMartin StaudtRoslyn N. Boyd

Andrea Guzzetta

Page 3: Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesionsdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/np/2019/9154282.pdf · 2019-07-30 · Editorial Neural Plasticity after Congenital Brain Lesions

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Research and TreatmentAutismDepression Research

and TreatmentHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Neurology Research International

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Alzheimer’s DiseaseHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

International Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

BioMed Research International

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Research and TreatmentSchizophrenia

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2018Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Neural PlasticityScienti�caHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Parkinson’s Disease

Sleep DisordersHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Neuroscience Journal

MedicineAdvances in

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Psychiatry Journal

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Multiple Sclerosis InternationalHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

StrokeResearch and TreatmentHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Behavioural Neurology

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Case Reports in Neurological Medicine

Submit your manuscripts atwww.hindawi.com