EVALUATION FRAMEWORK (WP5, T5.1,

D5.1) C atania, September 9-11, 2009.

Manuele Manente,

Q uality manager.

SUMMARY

Evaluation of the second test and comparison with the first one.

1. Users’ needs analysis 2. Usability of the prototype3. Test1 and Test 2 Comparison

Estimated time: half an hour.

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

2

USERS’ NEEDS ANALYSIS

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

3

Target group comparison First test Second test

Number and gender 21 learners / 3 women and 18 men 15 learners / 6 women and 9 men

Age average 30.3 21.1

Learning Estonian for (number of years)

19 mother tongue/ 2 foreign language (studied for 5 years)

4 mother tongue/ 11 foreign language (studied for 11,5 years)

Evaluator comments:

1.The number of participant is reduced, the group is limited for representativeness. Gender equity is improved.

2.The target group is clearly made of younger, so they should have a better approach to ICT, digital literacy - no digital divide.

3.The target group is composed mainly of non-Estonian mother tongue, rightly in line with project aims, even if the target group have an high level of Estonian grammar knowledge (average: 11,5 years of studies).

4

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

USERS’ NEEDS ANALYSIS

USERS’ NEEDS ANALYSIS

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

5

USERS’ NEEDS ANALYSIS

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

6

USABILITY OF THE PROTOTYPE

7

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

8

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

USABILITY OF THE PROTOTYPE

9

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

USABILITY OF THE PROTOTYPE

10

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

USABILITY OF THE PROTOTYPE

11

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

USABILITY OF THE PROTOTYPE

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork

12

TEST COMPARISON

THANK YOU FOR YOU ATTENTION

manente@jogroup.eu

13

Evalu

atio

n fra

mew

ork