DOCUMENT RESUME - ERIC · DOCUMENT RESUME ED 293 948 UD 026 134 AUTHOR Michie, Joan S.; Moore, Mary T. TITLE State Profiles of ESEA Title I/ECIA Chapter 1. INSTITUTION Decisior Resources

1

1

I I

1

1

I

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 293 948 UD 026 134

AUTHOR Michie, Joan S.; Moore, Mary T.TITLE State Profiles of ESEA Title I/ECIA Chapter 1.INSTITUTION Decisior Resources Corp., Washington, DC.SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.PUB DATE Aug 85CONTRACT 300-83-0211NOTE 285p.PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) Statistical Data (110)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Compensatory Education; *Educational Improvement;

Elementary Secondary Education; Enrollment;Expenditures; Federal Aid; Federal Programs; FederalState Relationship; Profiles; *School Demography;School District Spending; *Urban Education

IDENTIFIERS *Education Consolidation Improvement Act Chapter 1

ABSTRACTDescriptive profiles of the Elementary and Secondary

Education Act Title I/Education Consolidation Improvement Act Chapter1 programs are presented for each state and the District of Columbia.Where possible, comparisons are made between the 1979-80 school yearand the most recent year for which data are available. States areranked from highest to lowest to give an indication of relativestanding. The ranked variables include the following: (1) financialallocation; (2) number of public and nonpublic students; (3)percentage of students receiving help in various subject areas; (4)numbers of staff members in various categories; (5) pupil-staffratios; (6) per pupil expenditures; (7) per capita income; (8) taxinformation; and (9) racial and economic status of participants. Thestate profiles also include information on targeting approaches,testing programs, and other regulations specific to the state.(vM)

************************************************************************ Reproductions supplied by-EDRS are the best that can be made ** from the original document. ************************************************************************

DECISIONRESOURCESCORPORATION

State Profiles of ESEA Title 1 /ECIA Chapter 1

Joan S. MichieMary T. Moore

Prepared for:

National. Institute of educationU.S. Department of Education

August 1985

This report was prepared pursuant to Contract No. 300-83-0211as a part of the Congressionally - mandated Study of ECla Chapter 1

Decision Resources Corporation

BEST COPY AVHILABU

-`1',(76

U.S. DEPARTMS N'T OF EDUCATIONOtfice 01 EduceMenal Research and Improvement

EDUC 'ORAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

Tom document nas been reproduced asreserved lIeni the ()BMW' or Orimmtalidnatremateng .L

0 Minor engages have been made Id .rhIstOtre,eorOduclion °delay

Points ot view o, ocimioni..taled in this dccsv^, mem do not necessarily reoremffil official

OEM POS.tren or policy

State Profiles of RSEA Title I/ECIA Chapter 1

Joan S. MichieMary I. Moore

Prepared for:

National Institute of EducationU.S. Department of Education

August 1985

This report was prepared pursuant to Contract No. 300-83-0211as a part of the Congressionally-mandated Study of EC1A Chapter 1

Decision Resources Corporation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Acknowledgements iii

Overview 1

Data Sources b

Comprehensive State Tables 11

State Profiles 55

0

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to thank the many individuals who contributed to thedevelopment of these state profiles. Particularly helpful were JudithAnderson and Sandy Brown of the Office of Planning, Budget, andEvaluation; U.S. Department of Education.

Members of the Chapter 1 Study Team at the National Institute ofEducation, particularly Mary Kennedy, director, and Bea Birman, ourproject officer, provided us with direction and guidance throughout theeffort.

We hope this compilation of data is helpful for policy makers andresearchers in their effort to evaluate the impact of Chapter 1.

iii

Overview of the Title I/Chapter 1 State Profiles

As a part of the NIE study of ECIA Chapter 1, profiles have beendeveloped for each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Tablesdisplaying the 50 states and the District of Columbia on the range ofdimensions of interest have also been provided to allow more directcomparisons across states. The profiles and tables contain data onTitle I/Chapter 1 allocations, participants, and programcharacteristics. State characteristics, student information for thestate as a whole, and descriptions of other state programs have beenincluded to show the context in which Chapter 1 operates.

With the exception of state compensatory education programs, no newdata were collected to develop these profiles and tables. Rather,information from a number of sources was combined to produce a compositepicture. Major data sources were TIERS (Title I Evaluation and ReportingSystem), NCES (National Center for Education Statistics), and the U.SDepartment of Education, Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation(OPBE), Budget Service. A table which shows the source of each dataelement is included. Efforts were made to utilize information that wascomparable, but at times this was impossible. The limitations ofspecific data elements are described in a later section of this overview.

Whenever possible, amounts for the 1979-80 school year and the mostrecent School year are presented for each data element. Percent changefrom 1979-80 to the most recent year is also shown to give someindication of trends over time. School year 1979-80 was chosen as thefirst point of comparison for several reasons. It was the first year ofimplementation of the 1978 reauthorization of Title I. In addition,1979-80 was the first year for which TIERS data were available. The mostrecent school year for which data are available varies considerablydepending on the type of data, when it is collected, and the length oftime needed for ED to enter and analyze it. For example, the most recentTIERS data is for the 1982-83 school year, but Chapter 1 allocation datafor 1984-85 is already available. On the other hand, NCES does notconduct the Private School Survey on a regular basis; 1980-81 is the mostrecent year for which these data are available by state.

For each data element, states have been ranked from highest to lowestto give an indication of relative standings across items and acrosstime. The exceptions are the Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff,pupil/teacher and pupil/aide ratios which have been ranked from lowest tohighest because a low ratio is generally considered more desirable and ismore closely associated with a low rank. Whenever a tie occurred in theranks, the midpoint was used and the letter -T- was placed beside therank.

1

Whenever appropriate, totals for the 50 states and the District ofColumbia are included on the tables. Since the P S. territories havebeen omitted from these totals, the amounts may differ from other U.S.Department of Education documents.

One caveat applies to all TIERS data presented. In their TIERSreports, states had the option of using a sampling of one-third of theirdistricts for the section on student achievement scores (which are notincluded in these profiles). However, some states used sampling fortheir entire TIERS report. About 20 states used sampling each year butit is not known which sampled for just achievement scores and whichsampled for all data. Therefore, it is possible that some of thevariation presented is the result of sampling.

All TIERS data for Michigan for 1982-83 were unavailable at the timewe compiled the data, therefore 1981-82 data have been used asestimates. Similarly, staffing data for New Jersey for 1982-83 aremissing and 1981-82 data have been used as estimates. Californiacombines state compensatory education participation data with TitleI/Chapter 1 data. Hence, any of the data in TIERS reflect agreed uponestimates. Using these estimates in calculations can produce amountswhich are somewhat questionable. For example, the Title 1/Chapter 1pupil/staff ratio for California is quite a bit higher than that forouter states and the Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure issomewhat lower.

Data elements that need clarification or that have known limitationsare described below in the order in which they appear.

Total Title I/Chapter 1 allocation - includes LEA basicgrant, concentration funds (for 1979-80), money forprograms operated by SEAS, and state administration funds.

Total LEA grants - for 1979-80, both concentration fundsand basic grants are included.

State administration set operati in thecalculation for the most recent year, 1964-85 allocationdata have been used with the number of operating LEAs infall 1982. Few changes in the number of LEAs are expectedto be found when 1984 data become available.

In 1962, for the nation as a whole there were 323nonoperating school districts. The bulk of these werefound in seven states: Maine, Massachusetts, Nebraska, NewJersey, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin. NonoperatingLEAs were excluded from the calculation.

2

Title i /Chapter 1 participation data - only students in theregular term Title I/Chapter 1 program have been included;summer term participants are excluded. Subgroupings ofparticipant data do not add up to the total number ofparticipants for some states. In the breakdowns by gradelevel, pre-kindergarten has not been shown on the profile.Students, who were served in ungraded settings or for whomgrade level information was not available, were includedonly in the total count. Similarly, for some students itwas not known if they attended public or nonpublicschools. These students were left out of the subgroups butappear in the total Title I/Chapter 1 count. Anotherreason for some discrepancies was confusion in reportingneglected and delinquent participants.

For language arts, English for limited-English-proficient,health and nutrition services, and attendance and guidanceservices, a number of states reported that there were noparticipants (which appears on the profile as "0") or theyprovided no data (which appears as "-"). In bothinstances, these states have been excluded from therankings as is indicated by "NA" (not applicable) on theprofile.

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members - all typesof Title I/Chapter 1 staff were included in this number.However, only three subgroups of staff, teachers, aides,and administrative staff, appear on the profile. We haveomitted curriculum specialists, clerical staff, andsupporting staff.

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure - onlystudents in the regular school term were included in thecalculation. Adding summer term participants would affectboth the amount and the relative rankings of states. Allstudents served are contained in the Chapter 1 studentcounts. Thus, states with stable student populations wouldappear to have higher per pupil costs than states with highstudent turnover, if the number of Chapter 1 "slots" andthe cost per slot were held constant. In the calculation,total allocations to LEAs were utilized. However, statesmay not have spent all the allocation in a given year ormay have used carry over money from the prior year.

Overall average per _pupil expenditure the amountspresented are those utilized by OFBE, Budget Service in thecalculation of Title I/Chapter 1 allocations. They excludeTitle I/Chapter 1 money, tuitions paid by individuals, andcarry over from Title I, Title IVB, and Title IVC. Withineach state, separate LEA enrollment weights have not beenused to calculate the state average per pupil expenditure.

3

RTS tax capacity index the RTS index was designed toanswer the question, -What would be the total revenuepotential of the 50 states if every state applied identicaltax rates -- national averages -- to each of 26 commonlyused tax bases?" The RTS numbers are shown in index formwith the national average equal to 100; they do not showthe absolute change in the level of fiscal capacity acrossthe country. The use of an index number format facilitatesinterstate and cross-time comparisons.

Percent of total school enrollment served by P.L. 94-142and P.L. 89-313 combined total school enrollment consistsof the total public and nonpublic elementary and secondaryschool population which is between the ages of 5 to 17.However, programs for the handicapped serve students whoare aged 3 to 21.

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-English-proficient -considerable controversy surrounds the determination of thesize of the limited-English-proficient (LEP) population.We have used U.S. Census data to give some indication. Theamounts presented show the number of children aged 5-17whose ability to speak English was reported to be either"Not well" or "Not at all" and who live in homes in which alanguage other than English is spoken. The actual numbersof children counted as LEP from U.S. Census data aretypically smaller than the numbers reported in the Officefor Civil Rights (OCR) Survey but ranks are quite similarfor most states.

-School enrollment by race - for some states, racialpercentages do not add to 100 percent because someresponses did not fit into any of the categories used bythe U.S. Census.

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin - on theU.S. Census, all individuals of Spanish origin are alsocategorized by race. On the OCR Survey, an alternativesource of data not used here, Hispanic is considered as aseparate racial/ethnic group.

Distribution of children in poverty across LEAs - thepercentages of children in poverty are based on allchildren living in each school attendance area; thispercentage includes dropouts and kindergarten-age childrenwho are not in school.

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largestenrollment - the amounts presented answer the question, Ofall the poor children in the state, what percentage isfound in the LEA with the largest enrollment?"

4

Percent poor children in State in five largest LEAs - theamounts presented answer the question, "Of all the poorchildren in the state, what percentage is found in the fivelargest LEAs combined?" The names of these five largestLas are noted.

Minimum competency testing - definitions of minimumcompetency tests (MCT) vary. What some states consider anMCT, others call a state assessment program. Thesealternative interpretations result in apparentdiscrepancies when surveys of MCTs are compared. Toprovide some consistency across states, we have used onesource, Education Commission of the States (ECS)Clearinghouse Notes, January 1985, for this information.

School improvement programs and teacher reforms - a wealthof information on school improvement programs and teacherreforms has been produced in the past two years. However,each report or survey uses somewhat different categories topresent information, which sometimes results in apparentinconsistencies. In addition, new programs are constantlybeing added. To be as comprehensive as possible, we haveused an ECS survey (October 1983) and the Education Weeksurvey (February 6, 1985) our major sources and haveincluded other known information when appropriate.

The improvements described are State-sponsored programswhich were begun during the past four to five years. Weparticularly highlighted the presence of effective schoolsprojects and requirements for district or school planningbecause both activities have implications for the deliveryof Chapter 1 services.

Similarly, for teacher reforms we have noted career ladderor merit pay programs and testing requirements for initialcertification because these would be expected to affectChapter 1 staff.

5

Data Sources for State Profiles

Data Element Soarce

Title I/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation U.S. Department of Education (ED);Office of Planning, Budget, andEvaluation (OPBE); Budget Service

Total local education agency (LEA) ED, OPBE, Budget Servicegrants

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 ED, OPBE, Budget Service;dollars Consumer Price Index

State administration set aside

State administration set aside peroperating LEA

LEA child count for formulapurposes

ED, OPBE, Budget Service

ED, OPBE, Budget Service; NationalCenter for Education Statistics(NCES), Digest of EducationStatistics,'1981, 1983-84


Title 1/Chapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants Title I Evaluation and ReportingSystem (TIERS)

Number of participants X-b ELMS

Number of participants 7-12 TIERS

Number of nonpublic participants TIERS

Percent of all nonpublic schoolstudents served in Title 1/Chapter 1

TIERS; NCES, The Condition ofEducation, 1983

Number of public participants TIERS

Percent of all public schoolstudents served in Title I/Chapter 1

TIERS; NCES, Digest of EducationStatistics, 1981, 1983-84

Percent of students receiving reading TIERS

3 '

Data Sources for State Profiles (continued)

Data Element Source

Percent of students receiving TIERSlanguage arts

Percent of students receiving TIERSEnglish for limited7English-proficient

Percent of students receiving health TIERSand nutrition services

Percent of students receiving TIERSattendance and guidance services

Title I/Chapter 1 ProgramCharacteristics

Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 full-time TIERSequivalent (FTE) staff members

Number of FTE teachers TIERS

Number of FTE aides TIERS

Number of PTE administrative staff TIERS

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio TIERS

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil TIERS; ED, OPBE, Budget Serviceexpenditure

Instructional settings

Schoolwide projects

Chrys Dougherty unpublishedstudy for the House Committee onEducation and Labor and LWSchool of Public Policy, 1984

Chrys Dougherty - unpublishedstudy for the House Committee onEducation and Labor and LWSchool of Public Policy, 1984

State Characteristics

Number of operating LEks NCES, Digest of EducationStatistics, 1981, 1983-84

7


Data Element Source

Overall average per pupil expenditure

Overall average per pupil expenditurein adjusted 1979-80 dollars

Enrollment in public elementary andsecondary schools

Enrollment in nonpublic elementaryand secondary schools

Percent of total enrollment innonpublic schools

Enrollment in religiously affiliatedelementary and secondary schools

Percent of nonpublic enrollmentin religiously affiliated schools

Total enrollment in elementaryand secondary schools

Per capita income

Representative Tax System (RIS) taxcapacity index

Student Characteristics

Number of handicapped childrenserved under P.L. 94-142

Number of handicapped childrenserved under P.L. 89-313

8


ED, OPBE, Budget Service; ConsumerPrice Index

NCES, Digest of EducationStatistics, 1981, 1983-84

NCES, The Condition of Education,1983


NCES, Digest of EducationStatistics, 198


NCES, Digest of EducationStatistics, 1981, 1983-84

U.S. Department of Commerce,Bureau of Economic Analysis,Survey of Current Business, April1985

advisory Commission on Inter-governmental Relations (ACIR),"The ACIR Representative TaxSystem Method for Estimating theFiscal Capacity of the 50State-Local Systems," December 7,1984, and 1982 Tax Capacity ofthe 50 States, Preliminary, May1985

ED, Annual Report to Congress onF.L. 94-142

ED, OPBZ, Budget Service


Data Element Source

Percent of total school enrollmentserved by P.L. 94-142 andP.L. 89-313 combined

Percent of children aged 5-17limited-English-proficient

School enrollment by race

Percent of school enrollment ofSpanish origin

Percent of children aged 5-17 inpoverty

Distribution of children in povertyacross LEAs

Percent poor children in state inLEA with largest enrollment

Percent poor children in stare infive largest LEAs

Other State programs

State compensatory education program

Minimum competency testing

9

ED, Annual Report to Congress onP.L. 94-142; ED, QPBE, BudgetService; NCES, Digest ofEducation Statistics, 1981,1983-84

U.S. Bureau of the Census,Detailed PopulationCharacteristics, 1983

U.S. Bureau of the Census, GeneralSocial and EconomicCharacteristics

U.S. Bureau of the Census, GeneralSocial and EconomicCharacteristics

U.S. Bureau of the Census, GeneralSocial and EconomicCharacteristics, December 1983

U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980,Summary Tape File 3F (STF3F)

U.S. Bureau of the Census, 198U,STF3F

U.S. Bureau of the Census, 198U,STF3F

Decision Resources Corporation,Telephone Survey of StateCompensatory Education Programs,1984-85

Education Commission of theState, Clearinghouse Notes, StateActivity - Minimum CompetencyTesting, January 1985


Data Element Source

School improvement programs

Teacher reforms

lU

Education Commission of theStates, State Programs of SchoolImprovement, 1963: A 50-StateSurvey, October 1983; EducationWeek, "Changing Course: A50-State Survey of ReformMeasures," February 6, 1985

Education Commission of theStates, Clearinghouse Notes,"States Requiring Testing forInitial Certification," July1984; Education Week, "ChangingCourse: A 50-State Survey ofReform Measures," February b, 1985

Table I. Total title I/Chapter 1 AllocatLon

1979 -80 1904-85Allocation Rank Allocation Rank

Alabama 74,543,253 13 $ 65,205,686 14Alaska 7,742,051 47 8,160,162 48Arizona 34.94103J 28 40,614,690 2bArkansas 46,036,745 23 42,607,293 25California 299.993,371 2 361,453,783Colorado 30.443,069 31 J4,029,044, 31Connecticut 30,862,304 30 38,719,844 29Delaware 10,231,926 42 11,985,109 41Florida 112,684,114 7 151,015,173 b

Georgia 83,459,018 11 85,869,403 11Hawaii 11,890,296 39 10,264,676 44Idaho 9,981,512 44 12,559,147 39Illinois 144,310,048 4 172,757,130 4Indiana 41,666,684 25 50,287,315 21Iowa 26,995,705 33 28,073,206 34Kansas 23,012.446 35 25,108,241 35Kentucky 62,163,832 16 58,117,700 18Louisiana 90,127,435 1U 102,625,252 10Maine 13.743,167 38 15,920,172 36Maryland 53,631.563 21 55,237,176 19Massachusetts 70,158,771 15 84,086,405 12Michigan 133.955,709 6 138,463,579 7

Minnesota 42,777,486 24 39,282,605 28Mississippi 74,281.605 14 61,529,521 10Miasouri 53,913,054 20 51,696.872 20Montana 10,797,929 40 10,625,400 43Nebraska 16,685.985 37 16,430,522 37Nevada 4,922,245 51 6,773,166 50New Hampshire 5,662,733 49 8,129,674 49New Jersey 83,281,820 12 107,537,666 9New Mexico 26,042,296 34 28.222,22' 33Mew York 302,676.995 1 351,502,-5U 2North Carolina 93,181,062 9 60,115,700 13North Dakota 9,170.866 4b 8,673,381 46Ohio 96,477,532 8 112,5 6.IJ0Ukiahoma 36,303.263 27 39,126,777 27Oregon 32,968,926 29 36,161,167 40Pennsylvania 143,095.778 5 159,383,796Rhode Island 10,366,445 41 11,232,345 42South Carolina 57,965.593 19 49,035.128 21South DaKota 9,703,732 9,794.216 45rennestc 69,026,332 lb 65,029,93o 13Las:as 244,415.041 3 248,925,559Utao) 10.105.940 43 12,069,660 40Vermont 6,789.642 48 6,16-1,184 47Virginia 67,242,087 17 59,736,044 17

Washington 41,649,223 26 46,453,775 24West Virginia 29,992,743 32 29,693,010 32Wisconsin 49,707,786 22 47,850,510 23Wyoming 5.152,130 50 5,236,432 51District of Columbia 10 983 702------i---J---- 3b 17,093.918 36

Totals 83,068,035,543

11

G

83,324.655,614

Table 2. Torsi Title I/Chapter

1979-84LEA Grant Rank

1 LEA Grant./

1984-85LEA Grant Rank

Alabama $ 71,762,324 13 $ 62,194,713 15Alaska 5,681,315 47 5,062,539 50Arizona 27,711,021 29 32,386,766 29

Arkansas 40,957,148 23 35,959,150 28California 244,324,989 2 23940,944 2

Colorado 24,959,843 32 28,457,434 30

Connecticut 26,156,243 34 32,464,447 2$Delaware 7,179,875 45 8,458,275 45Florida 88,726,740 7 123,801,127Georgia 78,078,795 11 79,728,053 11

Hawaii 10.954,755 38 9,60,344 42Idaho 6,579,805 46 8,623,442 44

Illinois 121,813.172 5 146,758,334 4

Indiana 35,r .793 25 44,605,670 22

Iowa 25,-955 31 26,856,386 33Kansas 20,318,289 35 21,276,435 25Kentucky 55,719,658 17 52,884,352 18Louisiana 82,274,774 10 89,817,889 10Maine 14,181,655 39 12,220,832 38Maryland 48,193.652 21 51,387,719 19Massachusetts 52.952,842 19 67,798,097 13Michigan 118,838,720 121,884,447 7

Minnesota 39,249,529 24 36,849,678 24Mississippi 69,265,589 14 57,451,254 16Missouri 49,403,432 20 48,274,714 20Montana 9,195,412 41 9,843,578 41Nebraska 15.477,089 37 15,480,345 36Nevada 3,771,595 51 5,521,320 49New Hampshire 4,584,335 49 8,827,980 47New Jersey 72,933,441 12 99,222,239 9

New Mexico 22.876,819 34 25,409,911 34

New York 276,154,892 1 315,740,511 1

North Carolina 82,480,578 9 72,533,484 12

North Dakota 7,851,353 44 7,469,163 46

Ohio 84,849,918 B 143,812,886 8

Oklahoma 32,464,308 26 36,546,597 25

Oregon 24,059,776 33 27,227,799 32Pennsylvania 126,874,477 4 143,490,367 S

Rhode Island 9,429,796 40 14,661,727 39

South Carullna 54,618.004 10 46,953,347 21South Dakota 9,459,276 42 9,181,192 43Tennessee 65.907,511 13 62,878,531 14

Texas 174,757,354 3 183,938,533Utah 8,951,871 43 14,333,298 41

Vermont 4,959,457 48 8.146,599 48

Virginia 62,652,494 lb 56,821,749 17

Washington 30,935,920 27 34,577,829 27West Virginia 28,554,172 28 28,329,4213 31Wisconsia 44,575,1354 22 41,946,859 23

Wyoming 3,939,715 54 3,723,120 51

District of Columbia 15,925,791 3b 12,428,449 37

Totals $2,638,821,235 $2,884,415444

12

1 1I.

Table 3, Total LLA Grants In Adjusted

1982-83Adjusted

Basic Grant Rank

1979-U0 Dollars

1984-85Adjusted

Basic Grant Rank

Alabama 3 48,358,520 1J $ 43,071,131 15Alaska 3,727.021 47 3,505,913 50Arizona 17,501,392 31 22,428,508 29Arkansas 27,744.243 23 24,902,459 2bCalifornia 167,690,683 2 193,414,365Colorado /8,392,729 29 19,707,364 JOConnecticut 17,364,171 32 22,479,534 28Delaware 4,935,175 46 5.857,531 45Florida 63,260,82B 7 85,734,852 6Georgia 53.723.245 12 55.213,333 11Hawaii 5,296.314 43 6,651,900 42Idaho 5,165,559 44 5,971,913 44Illinois 89,021,041 4 101,633,196 4Indiana 25,969,223 24 30,890,353 22Iowa 17.697.112 30 18,598,606 33Kansas 14,260,569 35 14,734,;73 35Kentucky 37,624,117 18 36,620,743Louisiana 55,010,438 10 62,200,754 10

Maine 7.068,453 30 8,463,042 38Maryland 30,933,863 21 35,587,063 19Massachusetts 39,425,076 17 46,950,205 13Michigan 76,471,097 84,393,662 7

Minneaota 25,940,642 25 25,491,467 24Mississippi 46,300,754 14 39,786,187 16Missouri 34,861,780 2U 33,431,242 20Montana 6,407,294 41 6,678,377 41Nebraska 10,276,339 30 10,720,454 36Nevada 3,133,014 49 3,823,629 49New Hampshire 3,337,177 48 4,728,518 47New Jersey 54,829,422 11 68,713,462 9New Mexico 15,991,155 33 17,596.891 34New York 180,890,886 218,661,019 1North Carolina 55,635,108 9 50,230,651 12North Dakota 5,157,175 45 5,172,550 46Ohio 61,056.645 8 71,892,441 8Oklahoma 23,293,129 27 25,309,270 25Oregon 15,953,935 34 18.855,816 32Pennsylvania 83,595,973 5 99,370,060 5Rhode Island 6,536,007 4U 7,383,467 39South Carolina 36,770,010 19 32,516,168 21

Soutn Damara o0,41,43 6,358,166Tennessee 44,109.110 15 43,406,185 14lexas 121.674,388 127,379,670 3Utah 6,235,322 42 7,156,023 40

Vermont 3,003,638 5U 4,256,648 48

Virginia 41,800,899 16 39,350,242 17Washingtun 24,194,076 26 23,945,8b5 L7

West Virginia 19,994,197 za 19,618,716 31

Wisconsin 28,652,135 22 30,406,412 23Wyoming 2,617,061 53 2,578,338 51District of Columbia 10 110 910 37 9,437,984 37

'Totals 31,805,543,102 31,982,666,918

Table 4. State Administration Set Aside

1979-80 1984-85Allocation Rank Allocation Rank

Alabama $1,101,624 13 $ 611,284 14Alaska 225,000 44.51 225,000 43.51Arizona 516,373 18 380,751 26Arkansas 709,902 23 399.431 25California 4,433,399 2 3.388 524Colorado 449,897 31 319.481 31Connecticut 4)6,388 30 362,987 29Delaware 225,000 44.51 225,000 43.51Florida 1.665,281 7 1.421,535 6

Georgia 1,233,392 11 805,001 11Hawaii 225,000 44.51 225,000 43.51Idaho 225,000 44,51 225,000 43.51Illinois 2,132,660 4 1,619,548 4

Indiaaa 615,767 26 471,429 21Iowa 398,952 33 263.178 34X.Insits 340,085 35 435,382 35Kentucky 918,677 18 544,830 19Louisiana 1,331,931 10 962,082 10Maine 125,000 44.5E 225,000 43.51Maryland 792,584 21 517,832 19Massachusetts 1,036,828 1S 780,286 12Michigan 1,979,641 6 1.298,056 7

Minnesota 632,178 24 368,263 28Mississippi 1,097,757 14 576,821 lbMissouri 796,744 20 494,643 20Montana 225,000 44.51 225,000 43.5TNebraska 246,591 37 225,000 43.51Nevada 225,000 44.51 225,000 43.51New Hampshire 225,0110 44.51 225,000 43.5EMew Jersey 1,230,765 12 1.004,134 9

New Mexico 394,960 34 264,575 33Hew York 4,471,058 1 3,295,236 2

North Carolina 1.377,060 9 751,061 13North Dakota 225,000 44.51 225,000 43.5TOhio 1,425,775 8 1,055,387 8

Oklahoma 536,501 7 373,364 27Oregon 487,521 29 357,956 30Pennsylvania 2,114,715 5 1,494,177 5

Rhode Island 225,000 44.5T 223,000 43.51South Carolina 856.633 19 459,b90 22South Dakota 225.1100 44.51 225,000 43.51Tennessee 1,02U,093 lb 609,07 isTexas 3,61.:,339 3 2,333.605 3

Utan 44.51 215,00U 43.51Vermont 225,000 44.5£ 215,000 43.5rVirginia 993,725 17 560,008 17Washington 615,505 25 435,491 24west Virginia 443,242 32 278,363 32Wisconsin 734,597 22 4413,585 23Wyoming 225,000 44.5T 225,000 43.5rDistrict of Columbia 28U,547 30 225,000 43.51

Totals $46,623,587 333,144,619

14

Table 5. State Administration Set Aside Per Operating LEA

1979-80Amount Rank

1984-85*Amount Rank

Alabama i 8,674 10 S 4,770 13Alaska 4,327 22 4,245 17

Arizona 2,436 31.1 1,831 30Arkansas 1,903 37 1,077 40California 4,i92 23 3,200 21

Colorado 2,486 29 1,765 31

Connecticut 2,76b 28 2,2U0 27Delaware 14,063 6 11,842 7

Florida 24.655 4 21,217 4

Georgia 0,596 15 4,305 lbHawaii 225,0UU 2 225,000 1.51Idaho 1,957 36 1,957 29Illinois 2,10 32 1,607 34Indiana 2,02o 35 1.551 35Iowa 897 47 597 49Kansas 1,104 44 769 47Kentucky 5,076 19 3,027 22Louisiana 20,181 5 14,577 5

Maine 99I A5 966 42Maryland 33,024 3 21,576 3

Massachusetts 2,929 27 2,246 26Michigan 3,455 25 2,264 25

Minnesota 1,440 4U 847 45

Mississippi 7,222 13 3,770 20

Missouri 1,438 41 884 44

Montana 40.3 50 401 50Nebraska 238 51 232 5iNevada 13,235 7 13,235 bNew Hampahlre 1,433 42 1,424 37

New Jersey 2,U93 33 1,732 32New Mexico 4,373 21 2,973 24New York o.247 16 4,609 14

North Carolina 9,563 8 5,252 1.0

North Dakota 743 49 771 46Ohio 2,318 31 1,710 33Oklahoma 865 48 603 48Oregon 1,56n 39 1.158 39Pennsylvania 4,196 24 2,988Rhode island 5,625 17.51 5,625 8.51.

South Carolina 9,311 9 4,997 12South DJkotc 1,203 43 1,203 3dle-esses 6,693 14 4,17o 16rex 3s 3,354 20 Z,171 28Utah 5,625 17.51 5,625 8.51Vermont 918 AO 911 43Virginia 7,361 12 4,148 19Washington 2,052 34 1,452 36West Virginia 8,059 11 5,061 11Wisconsin 1,693 38 1,036 41

Wyoming 4,592 20 4,592 15District of Columbia 280,547 1 225,000 1.51

* Based on the n4mber of operating districts tellarted In fall. 1982, whichis the moat recent data available.

P.%

13

2 0

Sable 6. LEA Child Count for Formula

1979-U0Child Count Rank

hap:HMS

1984-85Child Count Rank

Alabama 273,b22 12 199,567 13Alaska 14,363 49 10,633 50Arizona 05,923 29 90,058 26Arkansas 156,574 2U 110,789 22California b49,467 1 719,249 1Colorado 75,518 32 66,086 31Connecticut 71,720 33 69,052 30Delnwsre 18,483 46 18,508 45Florida 307,31d 9 332,386 5Georgia 297,540 10 250,735 9Hawaii 29,046 41 23,295 43Idaho 24,467 45 27,537 40

331,981 5 342,198 4

Indiana 130,792 22 131,160 21Iowa 76,730 31 64,685 33Kansas 66,499 34 49,593 35Kentucky 212.593 14 164,959 16Louisiana 312,932 223,254 10Maine 38.459 38 37,239 3/

Maryland 123,827 25 107,728 23Masaachueetts 121,947 21 146,716 18Michigan 316,9U4 7 26b,26* 8Minuesota 110,030 26 84,484 28Mississippi 263,553 13 178,176 15

Missouri 178,774 19 138,653 2UMontana 25,91u 44 21,749 44Nebraska 48,405 26 37,704 36Nevada 11,494 50 14,867 48Hew Hampshire 15,340 47 46Now Jersey 180,1.55 18 2U9,083 12New Mexico 81.698 3u 64,891 32New York 678,449 2 672,780 2

North Carolina 317,967 221,539 11North Dakota 28,005 42 18,105 47Ohio 287,110 11 283,557 7

Oklahoma 125,025 23 93,462 25Oregon 64,499 35 57,415 J4Pennsylvania 335,178 4 319,639 6Rhode Island 25,949 43 24,207 42South Carolina 209.377 17 145,717 19South Dakota 34,967 39 27,517 41fenuessee 24,1.239 14 19.4,045 14Texas 644,917 571,781Utah 34.283 40 33,350 36Vermont 15,239 48 14,550 49Virginia 220,584 15 157,613 17Washington 92,712 28 90,052 27West Virginia 108,831 27 75,122 29Wlscometin 124,817 24 99,996 24Wyoming 10,473 51 7,611 51

District of Columbia 29 205 37 29 200 39

Totals 8,360,991 7,556,777

2

It

Table 7. total Number of Title

1779-88Number

of Students

I/Chapter

Rank

1 Students

1982-83Number

of Students Rank

Alabama 130,849 14 110,943 14Alaska 5,482 50 4,564 513

Arizona 67,197 26 41,007 28Arkansas 84,571 21 67,147 21California 825,946 1 1$47,560 1

Colorado 39,984 34 33,727 32Connecticut 60,503 29 32,72U 33Delaware 12,167 45 8,664 4bFlorida 157,923 9 144,291 6Georgia 159,646 8 113,946 13Hawaii 15,627 42 18,278 45Idaho 16,197 41 13,998 40Illinois 166,239 6 135,051 9Indiana 104,424 18 92,927 17Iowa 46,607 31 40,225 29Kansas 40,884 33 38,493 30Kentucky 114,881 16 102,625 15Louisiana 163,108 7 101,043 16Maine 26,480 37 22,574 36Maryland 63,284 27 56,037 26Massachusetts 81,579 22 72,501 20tilchigan 169,449 5 143,271* 7

Minnesota 72,227 24 55,535 27

Mississippi 131,811 13 114,385 L2Missouri 87,488 20 85,949 18Montana 12.991 44 11,577 43Nebraska 29,106 3b 21,412 37

Nevada 5,978 49 7,081 49New Hampshire 8,334 48 7,876 48New Jersey 121,379 15 169,046 5New Mexico 32,385 35 27,655 35New York 347,701 3 298,652 3

North Carolina 149,547 11 133,889 1UNorth Dakota 10,239 47 10,480 44Ohio 144,254 12 119,64U 11Oklahoma 79,448 23 61,090 23Oregon 47,326 30 36,337 3LPennsylvania 269,650 4 227,054 4

Rhode Island 18.745 39 12.043 42Slavin Caruiina 47,.i40 19 62,001 22South Uakota L5,272 43 12./40 41

Tennessee 151.249 10 130,045 0Texas 421,0130 2 315,841 2

Utah 21,6E16 36 16,839 38Vermont 10,883 4b 7,881 47

Virginia 111,781 17 03,389 19Washington 61,058 28 59,244 24West Virginia 43,782 32 32,147 34

Wisconsin 71,665 25 57,388 25Wyoming 4,735 51 3,841 51District of Columbia 16,886 40 15,569 39

Totals 5,148,503 4,437,802

* 1981-82 data were ueed to estimate 1982-83 data for Michigan.

17

Table 8. Number of Participants K-b

1979-80 1902-83Number Number

of Students Rank Of Students Rank

Alabama 115.629 10 100.846 1UAlaska 3,495 51 3.2413 51Arizona 46,047 27 29,655 29Arkansas 59,568 24 52,650 22California 585,021 1 613,258 1

Colorado 25,390 34 22.755 J3Connecticut 42,571 28 22,480 34Delaware 11,071 43 7,913 44Florida 139,996 5 120,013 5Georgia 113,894 12 85,788 14Hawaii 8,413 44 5,593 48Idaho 11,988 40 11.154 40Illinois 117,880 9 94,839 11Indiana 88,149 18 83,854 lbIowa 37,417 31 34,547 28Kanaas 30,835 33 29,565 30Kentucky 93,009 lb 83,268 1?Louisiana 114,360 11 85,710 15Maine 22,031 36 19,251 36Maryland 59,028 23 55,471 20Massachusetts 61,476 22 54,236Michigan 123,957 7 116,240KlaaeSota 62,466 21 51,458 23Mississippi 101,109 14 93,510 12Missouri 67,498 20 69,140 19Montana 7,017 48 6,626 45Nebraska 21,672 37 17,847 3?Nevada 3,547 5U 3,506 49New Hampshire 7,277 47 6,454 46New JeCsey 97,b27 15 106,422 9New Mexico 22,729 35 20,343 35New York 238,109 3 201,259 3

North Carolina 11(1.019 13 87,609 13North Dakota 7,983 45 8,821 42Ohio 110,915 6 110,930Oklahoma 50,301 26 43,986 27Oregon 32,066 32 25,730 32Pennsylvania 192,391 4 163,777 4Rhode island 12,025 39 8,300 43Soul: CarolinA 68.601 19 50,133 24South Oakata 11.410 41 10,J37 41iennessue 122,412 8 112,008lexas 347,095 2?1,02o 2

Utah 17.915 38 14,020 38Vermont 7,776 46 6,007 47Virginia 92,620 17 70,493 inWashington 42,442 29 45,914 25weac Virginia 38,384 30 28,709 31Wisconsin 54,212 25 44,716 26Wyoming 3,848 49 3,303 5UDistrict of Columbia 11 903 42 13.211 39

Totala

-----4---

3,895,794 1,428,121

1981-82 data were used to estimate 1962 -8J data for Michigan.

1B

Table 9. Number of Participants

1979-80Number

of Students Rank

7-12

1982-83Number

of Students Rank

Alabama 15,220 22 10.097 24Alaska 1,734 45 1,092 48Arizona 21,090 15 11,268 21Arkaoeaa 24,821 14 14.489 17California 203,602 228.925 1Colorado 13.152 2b 9.812 26Connecticut 12,842 27 8,701 27Delaware 1,065 49 708 49Fiorida 14,787 24 22.418 11Georgia 45,372 6 28.185 UHawaii 7,087 35 4,685 34Idaho 4,206 41 2,733 42

Illinois 42,724 7 34,047 7

Indiana 14,507 25 8.409 28Iowa 8.518 33 5,201 32Kanans 9.315 31 8,354 29Kentucky 21,00 16 19,357 1JLouisiana 45,758 5 12,668 19Maine 4,449 40 3,323 4UMaryland 3.101 44 208 51Massachusetts 17,tio7 20 16,235 15Michigan 38,262 9 23,4755 10Minnesota 9,753 2Y 4,028 35HisSissippi 30,702 10 20,875 12Missouri 19,324 15,877 16Montana 5,958 37 4,951 33Nebraska 7,421 34 3,585 37.5TNevada 2,431 46 3,575 36New Hampshire 962 50 1,278 47New Jersey 20,524 17 40,231 6New Mexico 9,589 JO 7,294 JUNew York 108,130 2 97,393 2North Carolina 39,148 8 46,139 4

North Dakota 2,251 47 1,659 45Ohio 8,790 32 5,932 31Oklahoma 28,844 12 17,515 14Oregon 14,910 2J 10,278 23Pennsylvania 75,002 62.446 3

Mende island 6,593 36 3,585 37.5TSouth Carolina 28,985 11 11,093 22South Dakota 43 2,403fennessee 76,613 13 26,037 9Texas 65,11.1 4 41,209 3Utah 3,774 42 2,819 41Vermont 2,555 45 1,451 46Virginia 18,018 19 12,047 20Washington 15,298 21 12,898 lbWest Virginia 5.398 38 3,438 39Wisconsin 11,889 28 10,090 25Wyoming 852 Si 518 50District of Columbia 4.983 39 2,378 44

Totals 1,147,414 947,224

1981-82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 data for Michigan.

161

Table 10. Percent of Title ItCnapter 1 Participation in Grades K-6 and 7-110

Percent in

Grades K-6

1979-80

Rank

Percent in

:aades 7-12 Rank

Percent in

Grades K-6

1982-8.1

Percent in

Rank Grades 1-12 Rank

Alabama 88.37 5 11.63 47 90,90 5 9.10 4;

Alaska 66.84 45 33.16 17 74.84 35 45.16 11

Arizona 68.59 43 11,41 12 71.47 40 27.53 12

Arkansas 70.59 38 29.41 22 78.42 JO 21.58 42

California 74.18 30 25.82 14 12.82 38 27.18 14

Colorado 65.88 4o 34.12 0 b9.87 4b 30.13 o

Wrioecticut 76.82 24 23.18 10 72,10 42 27.90 10

Delaware 91.22 3 8.76 48 91.79 4 8.21 48

Florida 90.45 4 9.55 37 34.26 15 15.74 37

Georgia 71.51 36 28,49 18 75.27 34 24.73 16

Hawaii 54,28 50 45.72 2 54,42 50 45.58 2

Idaho 74.03 31 25.97 23 80.32 29 19.68 23

Illinois 73.40 34 26.60 15 73.58 37 26,42 15

Indiana 85.87 9 14.13 46 90.89 6 9.11 4b

Iowa 81.46 19 18.54 43 86.92 9 13.U8 43

Kansas 76.80 25 23.20 20 77.97 32 22.03 20

Kentucky 81.55 18 18,45 25 81.14 27 18.86 25

Louisiana 71.42 37 26.58 44 87.12 8 12.08 44

maine 83.20 12 16.80 39 85.28 13 14.72 39

Maryland 95.07 1 4.93 51 99.63 1 0.37 S1

Massachusetts 77.68 23 22.32 19 76.96 33 23,04 19

Michigan 76.41 27 23.59 32 83.2U' 2U 16.80** 32

Minnesota 86.50 8 13,50 49 9:.74 3 7.26 49

Mississippi 76.71 26 23.29 3U 81.7S 22 18.25 JO

Missouri 77.74 22 22.26 28 81,52 14 18.48 28

Montana 54.08 51 45.92 3 57.23 49 42.77 3

Nebraska 74.49 29 25.51 23 83.35 18 16.65 34

Nevada 59.33 49 40.67 3 49.51 51 50,49 1

New Hampshire 88.32 6 11.68 46 83.54 17 16,46 35

New Jersey 82.63 13 17.37 39 72.57 39 27,43 13

New Mexico 70.33 40 29.67 12 73.61 36 26.39 16

Hew York 68.72 42 31.23 10 67.39 47 32.61 )

Worth Carolina 73.76 32 26.24 20 05.50 48 34.50 4

Worth Dakota 78.00 21 22.00 31 84.17 lb 15.83 Jo

Ohio 93.70 2 6.30 50 94.92 2 5.08 50

Oklahoma 63.56 48 36,44 4 71.52 43 28,48 9

Oregon 68.26 44 31.74 8 71.46 44 28,54 5

Pennsylvania 71.95 35 28.05 17 72.40 41 27.60 11

Rhode Island 64.59 47 35.41 5 70.15 45 29.85 7

South Carolina 70.24 41 29.76 11 81.88 21 18.12 31

South Dakota 78.49 20 21.51 32 81.14 26 18.86 kb

Tennessee 82.14 15 17.66 37 81,14 25 18.86 27

Texas 84.21 1U 15.79 42 86.79 10 13.21 42

Utah 82.60 14 17.40 38 83.26 19 16.74 33

Vermont 75.27 28 24.73 24 80.70 2B 19.30 24

Virginia 83.71 11 16.29 41 85.42 12 14,59 40

Washington 73.51 33 26.49 19 78.07 31 21.93 21

West Virginia 87.67 7 12.33 45 89.31 7 10.09 45

Wisconsin 82.01 lb 17.99 Jo 81.59 23 18.41 29

Wyoming 81.87 1? 18.13 35 86.44 11 13.56 41

District of Columbia 70.49 39 29.51 IJ 84.75 14 15.25 38

* Percentages were based on the number of participants who were reporteJ for grades K-12. Students in

pre-kindergarten and ungraded Battings or for woos grade level information was not available were excluded

from these calculations.

** 1981-82 dara were used to estimate 1982-83 data for Michigan.

Table 11. Number of Nonpublic Participants


of Students Rank of Students Rana

Alabama 1,221 25 985 2JAlaska 87 49.5T 43 .1

Arizona 1.536 22 651 31Arkansas 970 30 542 33California 14.219 J 20.398 J

Colorado 1,032 28 799 28

Connecticut 4,873 11 1,968 15Delaware 1,042 27 506 37Florida 4,390 13 3,573 14Georgia 1,116 26 273 42

Hawaii 326 43 234 45

Idaho 157 46 129 46

Illinois 5,036 6 6,850 6

Indiana 3,655 16 3,689 13Iowa 1,919 15 3,269 15Kansas 2,143 2U 1,557 26Kentucky 2,967 17 2,496 16

Louisiana 7,327 7 5,342 I.0

Maine 838 35 745 3UMaryland 2,481 19 L,197 22

Massachusetts 5.151 5 7,205 5

Michigan 4. 310 12 4,6681' 11

Minnesota 5,919 8 5.388 9

Hissiasippi 1,909 21 1,773 19Missouri" 192 45 260 4JMontana 434 40 442 38Nebraska 2,905 18 2,946 17

Nevada 87 49.51 of Sc)

New Hampshire 479 39 395 39Mew Jersey 12,454 4 10,956 4

New Mexico 1,373 23 1,241 21

New York 26,810 1 37,590 1

North Carol1na 726 36 517 lb

North Dakota 5J6 16 518 45Ohio b,U40 9 5,516 8

Oklahoma 273 44 312 40Oregon 850 34 1140 2b

Pennsylvania 25,947 2 22,236 2

Rhode Island 921 J2 847 45

South Carolina 597 37 _1.1 -44

Shutt, Uskora 8'19 _13 ON) 31

Tennessee 933 31, BZZ Li

Texas 5,185 1U 6,549 7

Utah 178 47 69 49

Vermont 421 41 309 41

V1rginia" 9 51 0 51WashingtOn 1,291 24 934 24West Virginia 412 42 235 44

Wisconsin 4,226 14 4,352 12

Wyoming 93 48 SU 46District of Columbia 981 29 789 29

Totals 179,490 173,601

It 1981-82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 data for Miehigaa.

" By -pass States in which independent contractors provide services tononpublic school students.

21

'fable 12.

AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCalifornia

Percent of All Nonpublic School StudentsServed in title I

19H0 -81Percent Ranx

1.762.713.346.292.15

43

32

258

3dColorado 3.01 27Connecticut 4.57 lbDelaware 3.94 20Florida 2.86 30Georgia 2.08 40HaWail. O.90 46Idaho 3.89 21Illiaoie 2.29 37Indiana 3.09 26Iowa 6.65 6

Kansas 5.71 ILKentucky 4.53 17Louisiana 4.77 13Maine 4.75 14Maryland 2.40 36

Massachusetts 6.97 3

Michigan 2.41 35

Minnesota 6.73 5Mississippi 3.60 24Missouri* U.16 50Montana 5.117 10Nebraska 6.62 7

Nevada 1.49 44New Hampshire 2.51 33New Jersey 3.41 12New Mexico 7.32 2

New York 9.59 1North Carolina 1.18 46North Dakota 4.53 18Ohio 2.93 28Oklahoma 2.10 39Oregon 1.96 41Pennsylvania 6.21 9Rhode island 4.ai 22South Laro.lina 1.26 .5South ikixota is.94 4

Tennessee 1.0: 47

texas J.78 23Utah 0.9U 49Versant 4.74 15Virginia* u.06 51Washington 1.113 42West Virginia 2.91 29WiscOnfin 2,50 34Wyoming 2.83 31District of Columbia 4.45 19

* By-pass States.

22

2 .

(able 13. Number of Public Patticipants


of Students Rank of Students Rank

Alabama 129,628 14 109,958 14

Alaska 5,393 50 4,471 5UArizona 65,661 25 40,358 28Arkansas 83,601 21 66,605 2UCalifornia 778,108 1 827,162 1

Colorado 38,952 JJ 32.928 32Connecticut 55,630 29 30,752 34Deiaw. e-%- 11.105 45 8,156 46Florida 153,533 9 139,716 b

Georgia 158,530 113,673 12Hawaii 15,301 42 10,044 44

Idaho 16,010 40 13,869 4U

Illinois 158,203 7 128,201 10Indiaaa 100,769 18 89,038 17Iowa 42,688 32 36,956 29Kansas 38,741 34 36,9jo J0Kentucky 111,185 16 100,129 15Louisiana 155,781 95,701 lbMaine 25,642 37 '21,829 36Maryland 60,803 27 54,840 25Massachusetts 73,396 23 65,296 21

Michigan 154,b31 5 138,603* 7

Minnesota 85,30 28 50,147 27

Mississippi 129,902 13 112,612 13Missouri 87,216 20 85,669 18Montana 12,557 44 11,133 43Nebraska 26,201 36 19,366 37

Nevada 5,891 49 7,020 49New Hampshire 7,855 48 7,481 48New Jersey 108,925 17 158,090 5

New Mexico 11,012 35 28,414 35New York 320,885 3 261,062 3

North Carolina 148,821 11 133,372 9

North Dakota 9,703 47 9,962 45Ohio 138,214 12 114,124 11

Oklahoma 79,175 22 61,378 23

Oregon 46,476 30 35,497 31Pennsylvania 242,703 4 204,818 4

Rhode Island 17,824 11,196 42South Carolina 97,363 19 61.528 22

South Ua,lotm 14,313 4,1 li.U70 41

Tennessee 150,3116 117 137,2z3 8rexaS 41U,631 2 3119,292Utah 21,5L1 313 1.1).7711 SOVermont 1U,462 46 7,574 47

Virginia 111,772 15 83,389 19

washingwn 59,7b7 28 56,312 24West Virginia 43,370 31 31,412 31

Wisconsin 67,439 24 52,926 26Wyoming 4,642 51 3,161 51DLatc11' of Columbia 15.905 41 14,780 34----__-_

Totals 4,929,504 4,264,12i

* 1981-82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 data for Michigan.

2

Table 14. Percent of kll PublicServed In Title I/Chapter

1979-8UFoment

School1

Kink

Students

1982-83Percent Rank

Alabama 17.19 b 15.14 7

Alaska 6.09 48 ).U0 47

Arizona 12.89 14 7.91 31

Arkansas 18.45 4 15.40 5

California 19.22 3 20.J5 2

Colorado 7.08 45 8.04 46Connecticut 9.82 28 6.12 43Delaware 10.67 23 8.8U 24

Florida 10.10 25 9.41 21Ceorgis 14.70 1U 1U.79 12Hawaii 9.07 32 8,20 44

Idaho 7.90 38 b.83 40Illinois 7.24 43 6.82 41

Indiana 9.30 29 8.91 23

Iowa 7.79 42 7.32 35

Kansas 9.16 3U 9.07 22

Kentucky 18.42 7 15.38 6

Louisiana 19.46 2 11.34 9

Maine 11.26 17 10.10 lb

Maryland 7.82 4U 7.84 34

Massachusetts 2.09 44 7.18 38

Michigan 8.85 33 7.87 JJ

Minnesota 8.39 35 7.01 39

Mississippi 26.95 1 24.05 1

Missouri 9.99 26 10.68 13

Montana 7.94 37 7.31 30

Nebraska 9.12 31 7.20 37Nevada 3.99 51 4.65 49new Hampshire 4.61 50 4.67 4B

New Jersey 8.46 34 13.48 B

New Mexico 11.25 18 9.B3 18

New York 10.81 21 9.6U 20North Carolina 12.94 13 12.18 10North Dakota 8.24 3b B.51 bo

Ohio 6.82 kb 6.13 45

Oklahoma 13.57 12 10.34 15Oregon 9.95 27 7.92 3UPennsylvania 12.33 15 11.48 11

Rhode island 11.57 lb 8.03 29

Soutn Carolina 15.5d 8 10.11 17South Dakota 10.74 22 9.74 19

'Tennessee 17.35 18.57 J

Texas 14.29 11 10.3o 14

Utah 6.46 47 4.53 5U

Vetmont 10.84 24 8.28 48

Vitginia 10.84 20 8.55 25

Washington 7.81 41 7.89 31

West Virginia 11.17 19 8.51 27

Wisconsin 7.86 39 6.74 42

Wyoming 4.86 49 3.7U 51

District of Columbia 14.98 9 16.22 4

4 1981-82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 data for Michigan.

Z.;

2

Table 15. Percent of Title 1 /Chapter 1 StudentsReceiving Reading instruction

1979-80 1982-83Percent Rank Percent Rank

Alabama 82.75 21 81.6U 12

Alaska 67.110 41 73.31 J7

Arizona 89.5.3 7 85.19 10Arkansas 56.41 46 75.68 JO

California 96.J8 I 86,30 7

Colorado 81.03 24 79.71 24

Connecticut 52.55 49 78.43 2

Delawre 89.83 5 92.56 15Ploaida 83.64 17 80,20 23

Georgia 79.95 26 79 ?1 27

Hawaii 94.89 2 95.13 1

ldah0 81.62 22 80.21. 2/

Illinois 85.12 15 80.45 21

Indiana 91.46 3 85.03 11

Iowa Hb.34 12 86.26 8

Kansas 73.94 37 7V.76 42

Kentucky 87.54 10 tld.67 5

Louisiana 64.26 42 68.98 44

Maine 78.86 29 80.83 18Maryland 85.45 14 83.36 13Massachusetts 72.33 39 76.57 31

Michigan 89.63 b 88.72* 4

Minnesota 81.46 23 80.51 2U

Mississippi 79-81 28 72.44 J9

Missouri 62.23 44 66.50 47

Montana 84.12 16 67.93 46

Nebraska 76.37 34 83.19 14

Nevada 83.14 20 28.81 51

New Hampshire 77.96 31 80.78 19

New Jersey 60.34 45 68.18 45New Mexico 54.94 47 51.87 49New York 83.54 18 72.41 4UNorth Carolina 87.59 9 81.2b 17North Dakota 79.92 27 79.10 28

Ohio 88.61 8 89.49 3

Oklahoma 73.35 ja 73.04 311

Oregon 83.28 19 82.39 lb

Pennsylvania 8b.77 11. 89.79 2

Rhode Island 44.85 Si 76.09 J5

South C.irollna 84.0 4J 58.79 40

South LaKnta 76.11 ja 70.97 Ji

lennesste 75.20 Jo 76.20 J4

Iexas 77,17 JJ 70.39 mJ

Utah 91.19 4 85.52 9

Vermont 71.21 4U 76.75 32

Virginia 77-16 32 78.IU JU

Washington 78.43 30 79.48 25

West Virginia 85.55 13 79.45 26

Wisconsin 48.18 50 48.51 5UWyoming 80.30 25 87.82 b

District of Columbia 60.V1 46 70.82 41


25

Tah1e 16. Percent of Title i/Chapter 1 Studentskeeeiving Math instruction


Alabama 32.21 32 20.7171 3bAlaska 50.09 9 34.90 27Atizona 24.14 41 B.29 50Arkansas 20.12 44 36.44 21California 93.0o 1 81.58 1Colorado 30.08 3b 26.48 39Connecticut 33.32 27 60.14 3

Deloware 14.64 24 33.51 28Flotida 11,07 34 35.67 23Georgia 55.60 7 51.95 bHawaii 5.11 51 4.57 51Idaho 32.93 29 30.07 32Illinois 32.61 30 30.70 31Indiana 26.82 40 29.99 33Iowa 18.44 47 411.90 15Kansas 34,74 22 34.69 25Kentucky 23.37 43 22.77 44Louisiana 44.15 12 39.05 18Maine 35.94 20 37.28 2UMaryland 58.15 4 58.72 5

Massachusetts 28.31 38 24.48 4UMichigan 56.03 5 51.16 9

RinneSota 71.98 2 68.20Mississippi 52.04 8 46.63 11Missouri 35.52 21 36.37 22Montana 32.32 31 42.16 14Mebtaska 34.00 25 39.24 17Nevada 55.75 b 54:92 8New Hampshire 10.22 50 11.83 48New Jersey 41.48 15 59.29 4New Mexico 11.82 45 13.68 47New York 36.15 19 35.54 24North Carolina 19.07 46 24.46 41North Dakota 28.41 37 24.01 42Ohio 10.25 49 9.50 49Oklahoma 34.16 24 33.99 26Oregon 33,68 2b 33.U6 29Pennsylvania 41.40 16 40.71 16Rhode island i0.17 48 15.43 40South Carolina 4.1.u4 14 40.'23 10South Dakota 59.19 3 33.59Tennessee 39.39 18 44.40 14Tcxa9 43.87 13 28.12 47Utah 49.71 10 30.85 30Vermont 27.44 34 23.99 44Vitginia 45.82 11 43.59 13Washington 28.55 36 24.65 3dwest Virginia 32.21 34 38.92 19Wisconsin 33.23 28 29.26 34

Wyoming 23.51 42 18.64 45District of Columbia 39.99 17 29.18 35


.2o

Table 17.Receiving

Percent of Title 1 /Chapter 1 Student!Language Astir Instruction

1979-80 1982-8JPercent Rank Percent Rank

Alabama 0.34 41 2.91 31Alaska 28.29 4 13.98 17Arizona 4.87 24 8.22 2LArkansas 4.24 27 0.78 19California 94.53 1 77.27 1Colorado 11.62 lb 18.44 5Connecticut 2.26 37 0.21 41Delaware 7.36 21 2.87 33Florida 1.91 38 2.50 JaGeorgia U NA 2.71 32Hawaii 0 NA - NAIdaho 6.56 22 7.24 23Illiaoie 4.43 25 6.62 24Indiana 2.74 35 1.92 36Iowa 0.26 43 - NAKaosas 0 NA 3.97 28Kentucky 1.16 39 - NALouisiana 0.53 40 9.13 16Maine 16.04 7 15.77 10Maryland U NA - NAMassachusetts 11.93 15 24.19 3Michigan 3.99 30 4.07* 27Minnesota 3.70 31 - NAMississippi 8.13 19 12.50 13Missouri 12.05 14 4.57 18Montana 12.92 10 17.25 6Nebraska 3.1)6 32 - NANevada 2.33 3o 8.42 20New HampshLre 14.24 9 11.L7 14New Jersey 12.44 tl WANew Mexico 30.25 3 37.02 2New York 4.32 26 16.13 9

North Carolina 0.32 42 4.86 29North Dakota 9.80 10 10.29 15Ohio 0 NA - NAOklahoma L7.84 5 18.73 7Oregon 12.14 12 16.50 BPennsylvania 2.81 33 0.62 391hode island 37.81 b 6.11 20South Carolina 15.82 8 13.84 12South UaKota 4.05 29 1.08 J7Tennessee 4.26 16 14.38 11Texas 10.75 17 3.54 3UUtah U NA U.28 4UVermont 2.77 34 2.6U 34Virginia 12.05 13 6.40 25Washington 7.39 20 7.79 22West Virginia U NA - NAWisconsin 35.59 2 21.34 4

WyOning 5.09 23 1.80 38District of Columbia a NA NA

6 1981 -82 data were used to estimate 1902-83 data for Michigan.

2:

S.) r1) iftr

!able 18. Percent of Title 1/ChapterReceiving English for Liadted-inglish-Proficieat

1979-00Percent

1 Students

1982-83RenA Percent Kank

Alabama ,04 27 - NAAlaska 7.06 b 1J.96 4

Arizona 12.97 3 12.78 5

Arkansas 0 NA - NACalifornia 19.02 1 27.45 1

Colorado U NA - NAConnecticut 13.18 2 15.01 3

Delaware 1.38 15 1.28 14Flotida 0 NA 0.16 25

Georgia 2.54 11 U NAHawaii U NA NAIdaho 0.46 21 1.11 16Illinois 1.11 lb 1.79 13Indiana U NA . NAIowa 0.32 24 - NAKansas 0 NA 0.58 2UKentutky (1 NA - NALouisiana 0 NA NAMaine 0 NA - NAMaryland 0 NA - HAMassachusetts 2.67 10 0.9S 17

Michigan 1.49 20 0.22 22

Minnesota 0,45 22 - NAMississippi 0 NA 0,17 24

Missouri 0.11 25 0.18 23

Montana U NA U NANebraska U NA - NANevada U NA U.88 18

New Hampshire 0.60 23 0.10 20

New JerSey 7.11 5 7.90 8

New Mexico 1.83 13 2.91 9

New York 6.38 7 9.02 7

North Carolina U OA 0.22 21

North Dakota 1.83 14 1.17 15Ohio 0 NA - NAOklahoma U NA - NAOregon 0 HA - NAPennsylvania 2.79 9 1.90 11

Rhode Island 8.93 4 22.78 2

South Carolina U NA - NASouth Dakota U HA - NATennessee 2.21 12 01.01 28

Texas 0.03 8 9.26 b

Utah U NA 1.91 1U

Vermont 0.09 26 U.04 L7

Virginia 1.05 14 1.46 12

Washington 1.04 17 - NA

West Virginia U NA - NAWisconsin U.42 19 NAWyoming 0 NA U.83 19District of Columbia 0 NA NA


Table 19. Percent of Title I/Chapter 1 StudentsReceiving Health and Nutrition Services


Alabama 46.09 4 26.52 6

Alaska 1.31 JO - NA

Arizona 0 NA - NAArkansas 1.20 31 - NA

California 87.93 I 38.17 3

Colorado 0 NA U.20 2b

Connecticut 0 NA - NA

Delaware 7.40 19 - NAFlorida 1.89 27 0.29 23

Georgia 2.07 26 0 NAHawall 0 NA - NAIdaho U NA 0.10 27

Illinois 0 NA 0.96 21

Indiana 1.17 32 1.00 20

Iowa 2.35 24 - NAKansas U NA - NAKentucky 21.70 10 17.04 10Louisiana 46.70 3 22.44 7

Maine 1.47 28 0.31 22

Maryland 27.62 8 21.28 II

Massachusetts 13.26 15 15.07 11Michigan 14.31 13 9.58* 12

Minnesota 1.44 29 - NA

Mississippi 48.49 2 44.32 1

Missouri 3.42 23 - NAMontana 2.31 25 U NANebraska U NA - NA

Nevada U NA 0.23 24

New Hampshire U NA 0 NANew Jersey 6.62 20 2.02 0New Mexico 8,88 16 26.74 5New York U.48 35 - HANorth Carolina 16.92 12 2.25 lb

North Dakota U NA - NAOhio 0.03 36 1.22 19

Oklahoma 9.59 12 2.01 18Oregon 3.67 22 - NAPennsylvania 3.83 21 0.22 25

Rhode Island 1.09 33 35.90 4

South Carolina 38.87 ) 44.00 2

South Dakota 0 NA - NA

Tennessee 14.06 1M 9.38 13

iexas 30.10 b - NAUtah U NA 20.90 9

Vermont 10.58 16 NAVirginia 26.92 9 8.48 14

Washington U NA - VAWest Virginia 27.86 7 - NAWisconsin C.93 34 NA

Wyoming 0 NA 2.42 15

Distant of Columbia 17.67 11 HA


table 20.Receiving

Percent of Title 1/Chapter 1 StudentsAttendance and Guidance Services


Alabama 28.40 6 29.24 7

Alaska 21.47 14 2.15 32Arizona 20.44 8 0.08 39Arkansas 43.44 2 20.64) 8California 0 NA .34.44 3Colorado 0 NA 2.42 31Connecticut 0.75 40 3.00 27Delaware 12.97 20 0.115 36Florida 10.71 20 4.01 2_1

Georgia V NA 0 NAHawaii 0 NA - NAIdaho 0.84 38 0.10 38Illinois 18.65 lb 12.65 14Indiana 8.80 29 J.64 24Iowa 0.91 37 - NAKansas 0.35 41 0.53 37Kentucky 40.98 3 32.70 4Louisiana 51.90 1 30.15 bMaine 10.77 25 6.93 19Maryland 10.88 24 11.47 lbMassachusetts 5.U2 32 3.30 25Michigan 14.63 18 24.80 11Minnesota 1.59 35 - NAMississippi 26.79 7 27-84 9Missouri 0.93 36 - NAMOntana 12.44 21 5.16 2UNebraika 0 NA - NANevada 0 NA 1.02 34New Hampshire 0.28 42 3.25 26New Jersey 8.96 28 34.89 2New Mexico 24.83 9 13.22 13New York 9.93 27 - NANorth Carolina 21.90 1J 4.78 2ZNorrh Dakota 0 NA - NAOhio 0.77 39 5.05 21Oklahoma 14.69 17 0.64 18Oregon 5.16 31 2.48 29Pennsylvania 36.04 5 37.26 1Rhode Island 13,71 19 31.95 5South Carolina 22.47 12 20.28 10South Dakota 1.93 34 - NATennessee 40.80 4 9.83 17Texas 24.36 10 - NAUtah U NA U.83 45Vermont 5.66 30 1.29 33Virginia 23.59 11 15.63 12Washington 0 NA 2.96 213

West Virginia lb.lb lb - NAW1sconsim 11.19 2J NAWyoming 11.34 22 12.29 15District of Columbia 3.99 33 Z.43 30


_iU

Table 21. Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FfL Staff Members

1979-80Number of

Staff Rank

1982-83Number ofStaff Rank

Alabama 3,140 24 3,445 15Alaska 244 49 173 5UArizona 2,653 28 1,490 28Arkansas 3,941 22 2,830 22California 16,198 1 15,137 2Colorado 1,719 32 1,248 32Connecticut 2,683 27 1.803 27Delaware 494 40 369 4bFlorida 6,003 6 4,794 7

Georgia 6,138 8 9,366 3Hawaii 552 46 294 46Idaho 817 40 540 40Illinois 5,934 12 4,399 9

Indiana 4,019 20 3,075 19Iowa 1,955 30 1,174 34

Kansaa 1,497 35 1,180 J3Kentucky 3.944 21 3,000 20Louisiana 6,033 9 4,082 12Maine 1,387 36 1,059 36Maryland 4,230 18 2,764 23Massachusetts 5,151 14 3,423 lbMichigan 6,891 5 5,936* 5

Minnesota 4,170 19 2,361 24Mississippi 6,004 10 4,321 10Missouri 3,317 23 2,876 21Montana 772 42 507 42Nebraska 1,218 37 836 37Nevada 241 50 192 49New Hampshire 592 44 404 45New Jersey 4,985 lb 4,088* 11

New Mexico 1,677 33 1,302 31New York 15,722 2 9,219 4

North Carolina 6,478 7 3,865 13North Dakota 581 45 491 43Ohio 5,264 13 3,510 14Oklahoma 2,890 2b 1,841 2bOregon 1,871 31 1,110 35Pennsylvania 8,345 4 5.900 6Rhode ',Land 646 43 426 44South Carolina 4,456 17 3,147 18South Dakote 1.010 3E: 725 39Tennessee 5.'1438 11 4,01:1 8Texas 13,951 3 15,090 1

Utah 951 J9 750 38Vermonr 509 47 333 47Virginia 5,032 15 3,334 17Washington 1,584 34 1,329 30West Virginia 2,U61 29 1,448 29Wisconsin 3,006 25 2,209 25Wyoming 228 51 142 51District of Columbia 778 41 518 41

Totals 190,882 149,069

* 1981-82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 data fbr Michigao andNew Jersey.

3.

:3 13

Table 22. Number of PM Teacners

1979-0ONumber

of fenChers Rank of

1982-83HumbericaChers Rank

Alabama 2,555 10 2,087 11

Alaska 84 51 57 5iArizona 753 30 508 31

Arkenaas 1,341 24 1.051 24

California 2,418 11 3.391 3

Colorado 801 2b 724 27

Connecticut 1.174 25 870 10

Delaware 129 48 103 47

Florida 2,61U 9 1.919 13Ueorgia 3,193 5 1,30 IUHawaii 355 38 200 41

Idaho 225 44 202 42

filinole 3,477 4 2,850 5

Indiana 767 28 525 33

Iowa 1,588 22 1,863 23Kansas 855 27 684 28

Kentucky 2,059 15 1,700 17

Louimiana 1,716 14 1,10 21

Maine 23$ 42 14b 44Maryland 704 31 674 29

Massachusetts 2,438 11 1,871 14Michigan 1,995 lb 1,831* 15

Minnesota 1,8U8 17 1,014 25

MiSsissippi 2,319 13 1,744 lb

Missouri 1.150 14 1,961 12

Montana 321 40 253 40Nebraska 072 33 507 34

Nevada 46 58 79 50

New Hampshire 149 47 118 40

New Jersey 2,673 8 1,410* 9

New Mexico 602 34 553 32Kew York 6,485 1 4,177 2

8Orth Carolina 2,817 7 2.412 8

North Dakota 386 37 330 38

Ohio 3,079 3 4,708 b

Oklahoma 1,046 20 1.21$ 10

Oregon 056 35 425 3t

Pennsylvania 197 45 2,124 4

Rhode island J3Y 39 20 J,

South Carolina 1,621 21 1.13.: aSouth Dakota 457 jo 3:48 J7

fennessee 2,911 b 2,57Z 7

texas 5,0108 2 5,6$u I

Utah 185 46 103 48Vermont 232 43 102 4J

Virginia 1,760 14 1,40 18Washington 758 29 605 JO

West Virginia 701 32 494 35

Wisconsin 1,478 23 1,327 19

Wyoming 119 49 94 49

District of Colombia 282 41 126 45

Totals 74,200 63,370

* 1981..82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 data for Michigan andNew .Jersey.

J2

fable 23. Number of Fre Teacher Aides

1979-80 1982-83Number Numberof Aides Rank of Aides Rank

Alabama 146 48 917 2UAlaska 139 49 85 48Arizona 1,632 19 755 24Arkansas 2,210 15 1.577 12California 11,254 1 9.074 1

Colorado 680 33 353 37Connecticut 1,146 25 738 26Delaware 323 41 222 41Florida 3,304 a 2,468 5Georgia 2,608 13 3,237 4

Hawaii 194 45 32 51Idaho 341 39 275 4UIllinois 1,539 10 757 23'Indiana 2,620 12 2,378 6Iowa 231 43 89 46Parma! 547 35 417 35Kentucky 1,345 22 937 19Louisiana 3,296 7 2,245 7

Maine 904 30 765 22Maryland 2,766 1U 1.7119 iUMassachusetts 2,102 16 1,03J 17Michigan 4,047 4 3,272a 3Minnesota 1,877 18 1,142 16Mississippi 2,847 9 1,930 9Missouri 955 26 626 27Montana 406 38 230 41Nebraska 424 37 299 39Nevada 99 50 88 47New Hampshire 318 42 214 43New Jersey 1,410 21 1,183v 15New Mexico 829 31 579 29New York 8,220 2 748 25North Carolina 3,161 8 974 14North Dakota 187 47 156 44Ohio 1,228 24 561 32Oklahoma 915 29 551 33Oregon 1,045 27 571 31Pennsylvania 3,394 5 2,147 8Rhode Island 187 46 $9 49So u t u Carolina 2,223 14 1.530 iJSontu U4Kota 491 36 371 JOLennassee 2,U80 17 1,64i ilTexas 5,734 3 8,16J 2Utah 70b 32 594 28Vermont 224 44 141 45Virginia 2,630 ii 1,498 14Washington 675 34 576 3UWest Virginia 1,102 26 412 21Wisconsin 1,246 23 54i 34Wyoming 08 51 30 50District of Columbia 337 40 389 38

Totals 88,441 61,726

* 1981-82 data were used to estimate 1961-83 data for Michigan andNew Jersey.

33

3 Li

Table 24, Number of FIT Administrative Staff

1979-80 1982-03Number of Number of

Administrators Rank Administrators Rank

Alabama 107 17 93 14Alaska 8 43 b 44

Arizona 73 24 53 24Arkansas 71 25 65 23California 154 9 114 6Colorado 4: 31 29 31Connecticut 0 NA 65 L2Delaware 12 41 12 40Florida 77 22 67 21Georgia 131 10 117 9

Hawaii 3 47 4 4bIdaho 25 35 17 37Illinois 127 13 211 3

Indiana 74 23 41 27Iowa 0 NA 0 NAKansas 43 30 26 34

Kentucky 101 19 81 19Louisiana 93 21 90 lbMaine 0 NA 0 NAMaryland 5i 27 47 25Massachusetts 160 13 122 8Michigan 26b 4 218 2Minnesota 130 11 93 15Mississippi 1b8 7 124 7

Missouri 26 34 32 29;brMontana 20 37 6 43Nebraska J6 Jj 18 36Nevada 3 48 2 49New Hampshire 45 29 24 33New Jersey 205 6 206" 4New Mexico 7 44.57 9 42New York 257 5 190 5North Carolina 122 14 99 13North Dakota 7 44,57 4 45Ohio 130 12 102 12Oklahoma 115 15 32 29.51Oregon 41 32 22 35Pennsylvania 376 3 115 10Rht.de island 21 36 27 32South Carolina 95 20 73 IUsouth oskota a 40 3 47Tennessee 496 2 107 11Texas 1,662 1 274 1Utah 18 39 12 39

Vermont 17 40 12 41Virginia 114 16 87 17

Washlogron 14 28 34 lbWest Virginia 55 26 42 26

Wisconsin 105 18 07 18Wyoming 11 42 3 48District of Columbia 19 38 13 38

Totals 5,940 3,301

1981-82 data were used to estimate 1482-83 data for Miehigao andNew Jersey,

fable 25. Title I/Chapter 1

1979-80Ratio

Pupil /Staff Ratio

1982-83Rant; Ratio Rank

Alabama 41.59 50 32.20 32Alaska 22.4? 20 2b.38 25Arizona 25.33 34 27.52 29Arkansas 21.40 14 23.73 10California 50.94 51 55.59 51Colorado 23.26 26 27.02 27Conoetricur 22.55 21 18.15 3Delaware 24.b3 31 23.48 15Florida 23.21 24 24.85 32Georgia 26.01 .17 12.17 1Hawaii 28.31 44 34.9b 47Idaho 19.82 10 25.54 22Illinois 28.01 43 30.77 3bIndiana 25,98 3o 30.22 35Iowa 23.84 27 34.26 45Kansas 27.31 4U 32.40 34Kentucky 29.13 4o 34.21 44Louisiana 27.04 39 24.75 2UMaine 19.09 li 21.32 10Maryland 14.96 2 20.27 7

Massachusetts 15.84 4 21.18 dMichigan 24.55 3U 24.14* 19Minnesota 17.32 b 23.52 ibMississippi ::1.95 lb 26.41 2oMissouri 2b.35 .id 25.88 31Montana lb.B3 5 23.0b 14Nebraska 23.90 28 25.61 2JNevada 24.80 32 J6.88 48New Hampshire 14.08 1 19.50 4New Jersey 24.35 29 32.72* 4UNew Mexico 19.31 9 21.24 9

New York 22.12 18 32.40 38North Carolina 23.U9 23 34.64 46North Dakota 17.62 7 21.34 11Ohio 27.40 41 34.09 43Oklahoma 27.43 42 33.51 42Oregon 25.24 jj 32.74 41.

Pennsylvania 32.19 48 38,48 49Rhode Island 29.02 45 28.27 30South G4rollni 21.9d 17 14.72 5South J.114.0t4 i!...1.! J 17.57fennesoee 25.34 J5 29.9J 32Z.:A.:as JU.18 .i 2b.1i oUtvi 22.80 22 42.45 13Vet-boor 21.Jd 1J 23.b7 17Virginia 22.21 19 25.01 21Washington 28.55 49 44.58 50West Virginia 21.24 12 22.20 12Wisconsin 23.22 25 25.94 24Wyoming 20.77 11 27.05 28District of Coiumbia 21.70 15 .50.00 34

* 1961 -82 data were used to estimate 1482-83 data for Michigan andNew Jersey.

Table 26. Title I/Chapter 1 Pupil/Teacher Ratio

1979-80 1962-83Ratio Rank. Ratio Kank

Alabama 51.21 21 53.16 20

Alaska 65.20 37 80.07 4U

Arizona 89.24 43 69.74 34

Arkansas 63.07 35 63.09 29California 341..58 5U 249.94 5L

Colorado 46.44 13 4b.58 LiConnectitut 51.54 22 37.fi1 3

Delaware 94.32 45 84.12 42Florida 60.51 32 74.67 37

Georgia 50.00 2U 47.78 15Hawaii 44.02 11 49.09 17Idaho 71.99 34 69.30 33Illinots 47.81 15 47.39 14Indiana 130.15 49 177.00 50Iowa 29.35 2 37.84 4

Kansas 47.81 16 56.28 26Kentucky 55.79 27 60.37 26

imulalana 95.05 46 84,50 43

Maine 111.16 47 154.02 40Maryland 119.139 44 81.53 41

Massachusetts 33.4b 4 38.75 5

Michigan 84.94 42 77.324 JU

Minnesota 39.95 7 54.23 22Mississippi 56.84 19 65.59 31

Missouri 39.95 8 43.83 9

Montana 40.47 9 45.76 12

Nebraska 43.31 1U 42.23 7

Nevada 6Z.27 33 . 89.63 4bNew Ramophire 55.93 28 66.75 32New Jersey 45.41 12 70.14 35New Mexico 48.91 19 50-01 18New York 53-02 25 71.50 36North Carolina 53.09 24 55.51 25North Dakota 2b.53 1 31.76 1Ohio 39.21 5 44.18 10Oklahoma 48.27 17 50.61 19

Oregon 72.14 39 85.50 44Pennsylvania 1,363.71 51 77.45 39

Rhode Island 55.29 26 45.45 11Soutc Carolina bli..J 31 54.132 23South Dar.ots Ji.42 -1 3b.bi 2

Tennessee 5L.95 21 51.6i 21

Texas 43.47 41 55.51 24

Utah 117.22 48 161.49 49Vermont 46.91 14 48.bo lbVirginia 63.51 36 59.35 27

Washington 80.55 40 89.V9 45West Virginia 62.44 34 65.04 30Wisconsin 44.49 18 43.19 8

Wyoming 39.79 b 40.116 6

District of Columbia 59.8B 30 123.50 47


Jo

A -

Table 27. Title I/Chapter 1 Pupil/Aide Ratio

1979-50Ratio Rank

19432-83Ratio Rank

Alabama 890.23 51 120.99 42Alaska 39.44 12 5J.09 21Arttoaa 41.18 15 54.31 22Arkansas 38.10 8 42.58 12California 71.19 37 93.41 34

Colorado 58.0U 32 95.54 35Connecticut 52.00 28 44.34 15Delaware 37.67 7 39.03 El

Florida 47.00 24 55.00 25Georgia b1.21 34 35.20 5Hawaii 00.55 4i 321.19 49Idaho 47.5U 23 50.90 2UIllinois 108.02 48 17a.40 46Indiana 39.66 14 39.05 9Iowa 201.76 50 451.97 51Kansas 74.74 39 92.31 33Kentucky 05.22 42 109.33 4ULouisiana 49.49 26 44.22 14Maine 29.29 J 29.51 2Maryland 22.72 1 31.32 3Massachusetts 38.81 10 70.19 29Michigan 41.87 lb 43.79* 13Minnesota 38.48 9 48.63 17Mississippi 46..1U 21 59.27 2bMissouri 91.53 46 137.30 43Montana 32,00 6 50,34 18Nebraska 68.65 35 71.61 30Nevada 6U.J8 33 80.47 31New Hampshire 20.21 2 36.80 oNew Jersey 86.05 4J 142.9U 4SNew Mexico 39.07 11 47.76 16New York 42.30 17 399.27 50North Carolina 47.31 22 137.46 44North Dakota 54.75 J0 67.15 2dOhio 117.47 49 213.26 45Oklahoma 06.0J 44 111.9b 41Oregon 45.29 20 63.64 27Pennsylvania 79.15 4U 105.75 38Rhode island 100.24 47 204.12 47South Carolina 44.07 19 40.56 L.South Dakota 31.10 5 34..14 4

Tennessee 72.71 30 83.92 32Texas 73.42 38 38.69 7

U tat' 30.72 4 28.1b J.

Vermont 48.59 25 55.51 2.1

Virginia 42.50 18 55.67 24

Washington 90.46 45 102.86 37

West Virginia 39.73 IJ 39.59 10Wisconsin 57.52 31 105.93 39

Wyoming 53.81 29 101.08 J6District of Columbia 50.11 27 50.39 19


37

A-"14 Ad

Table 28. Title I/Chapter 1 Average Per Pupil Expenditure

1979-80APPE Rank

1982-83APPE Rank

Alabama S 546.44 27 4 589.32 31

Alaska 103u.36 1 1104.0 1

Arizona 412.38 46 577.02 32

Arkansas 484.29 39 556.0 35

California 295.81 51 267.49 51

Colorado 624.23 15 737.30 13Connecticut 432.31 43 717.49 17

Delaware 590.11 19 770.12 1UFlorida 561.84 22 596.09 20

Georgia 489.07 37 637.44 25

Hawaii 701.01 V 696.b9 18

Idaho 4U6.24 48 490.92 44

Illinois 732.76 7 t11.19 3

Indiana 343.32 50 377.83 50

Iowa 542.69 29 594.82 29

Kansas 490.97 36 500.88 42Kentucky 485.02 38 495.67 46

Louisiana 504.39 34 736.00 24

Maine 384.50 49 423.34 49

Maryland 761.55 6 746.34 12

Massachusetts 661.36 12 735.21 15Michigan 689.52 11 787.44 8

Minnesota 543.42 28 631.53 26

Mississippi 525.49 31 547.20 36Missouri 505.20 21 546.76 37

Montana 707.80 8 748.26 11

Nebraska 531.75 30 04E1.87 24

Nevada 00.91 14 598.2D 27

New Hampshire 549.60 26 572.86 33

New Jersey 600.87 17 435.52 47

New mexieo 700.22 10 781.78 9

New York 794.23 4 818.89 6

North Carolina 551.54 25 561.8U 34

North Dakota 766.81 5 60.31 23Ohio 580.63 20 689.97 2U

Oklahoma 408.02 47 510.49 41

Oregon 506.34 32 593.60 30Pennsylvania 472.27 40 492.77 45

Rhode Island 503.59 35 733.76 lb

South Carolina 557.47 24 80144 7

Snuth Ddkota D9i.2J t8 694.41 19Tennessee 435.78 42 43240 4bTexas 415.19 44 52U.64 i9

ULah 412.79 45 500.03 43

vermont 455.71 41 515.15 40

Virginia 560.49 23 677.73 21

Washington 50.66 33 552.11 36

West Virginia 652.19 13 840.89 5

Wisconsin 622.UU lb 675.96 22

Wyoming 832.04 3 921.16 2

District of Columbia 943.14 - 076.02 4

1981-82 data were used to estimate 1982-83 Ors for Michigan.

34

Table 29. Number of

1979 &ft

Number

Operating

Rank

LEAs

1982-03Number Rank

Alabama 127 36 12d 36

Alaska 52 43 53 43

Arizona 212 25 2013 25

Arkansas 373 lb 371 16

California 1.133 J 1,U33 2

Colorado 101 28.51 181 28Connecticut 16j. 31/ 10 30Delaware 16 49 19 40Florida 67 4U 67 4UUeotgia 187 26.5T 107 Lo.S1Hawaii I 50.5f SU.5TIdaho 115 37 115 37

Illinois 1,011 4 1.008 3

Indiana 304 20 304 20

Iowa 445 13 441 13Kansas 307 19 306 19

Kentucky 181 20.5T 180 29Louisiana 66 4i 66 41

Maine 227 24 23J 24

Maryland 24 47 24 47

Ma9aachueetts 354 17 351 17

Michigan 573 9 572 9

Minnesota 439 14 435 14

Mississippi 152 32 153 32

Missouri 554 11 548 11

Montana 558 10 561 10Nebraska 1,035 Z 968 4

Nevada 17 48 17 49

New Hampshire 157 31 150 31

New Jersey 588 8 582 8

New Mexico 88 39 89 39New York 716 5 715 5

North Carolina 144 34 143 34

North Dakota 303 21 292 22

Ohio 615 7 615 7

Oklahoma 620 6 619 6

Oregon 113. 18 309 10Pennsylvania 504 12 500 12

Khode Island 40 45.5r 40 45-5TSouth Carolina 92 38 92 30

South DaKoto 157 20.1" 107 29.5fIenne$see 140 Ja 14o 3s

Texas 1,U:7 1 1,075 1

Utah 4U 45-5T 40 45.51

Vermont 245 23 247 22,

Virginia 135 35 135 25

Wastington 300 22 300 21

Wear Virginia 55 42 55 42

Wisconsin 434 15 433 15

Wyoming 49 44 49 44

District of Columbia 1 50,5T 1 5U.51

Totals 15,625 15,517

J9

Table JO. Overall "d rage Per Pupil

1979-00 1902-83APPE Rank APPE

Lependiture*

Rank

1982-.03 AM:in Adjusted

1979-dU Dollars

Alabama $1,469 50 $1,070 42 S1,537Alaska 4,540 1 7,244 1 5,350Arizona 1,688 AO 2,452 37 1,014Arkansan 1,422 51 1,055 50 1.372California 2.104 22 2,6bU 30 1.967Colorado 2.353 17 3,118 10 2,300Connecticut 2,34i 18 3.565 b 1.637Llrlawarc 2,722 b 3,354 10 2.46iFlorida 1,793 39 2,579 35 1.908Geotgia 1,490 4B 2.000 44 1.479Hawaii 2.241 21 3,182 lb 2,354Idaho 1.504 45 1,994 46 1.475Illinois 2,402 11 3,011 21 2.227Indiana 1.047 32 2.368 41 1,751Iowa 2,253 20 3.432 19 2,243Kansas 2,098 23 2.989 23 2.211Kentucky 1,568 4b 1.999 45 1.479Louisiana 1,636 42 2,632 32 1,947Maine 1.082 40 2.393 39 1,770Maryland 2.484 10 3,301 9 2,480Massachusetts 2,731 5 3.304 11 2,444Michigan 2.541 8 3.234 12 2,392Minnesota 2.300 19 3,031 20 2.242Mississippi 1.482 49 1,698 51 1,250Missouri 1.897 29 2.394 38 1,771Montana 2,367 16 3.224 13 2,345Nebraska 2,06J 24 2,920 24 2,160Nevada 2,032 25 2,582 34 1,910New Hampshire 1,836 34 2,701 29 1,999New Jersey 3,093 3 3,945 5 2,918New Mexico 1,921 27 2,803 25 2,073New York 3,304 2 4,573 2 3,382North Carolina 1,b44 4i 2,074 43 1,534North Dakota 1.824 35 2,746 2b 2,031Ohio 2,U07 2b 2,621 33 1,939Oklahoma 1,838 33 2,749 27 2,026Oregon 2,57b 7 A.425 b 2,533Pennsylvania 2,431 13 3,218 14 2,380Rhode island 2,448 12 3,401 7 2,560Soutn Carolina 1,598 44 1,920 49 1,425South Dakota 1,790 30 2.340 4U 1,706Tennessee 1,505 47 1,945 40 1,439lesas 1,815 36 2,633 31 1,947Utah 1,606 43 1,978 47 1,463Vermont 1,911 28 2,992 22 2,213Virginia 1,879 31 2,549 3b 1,885Washington z,498 9 3,143 17 2,325West Virginia 1.812 37 2,704 28 2,000wiSConsin 2.396 15 3,194 15 2,362Wyoming 2,427 14 3,986 4 2,948District of Columbia 3,070 4 4,103 3 3,035

* Excludes Title L/Chapter I. tuitions paid by individuals, andcarryover from Titles 1, Iv b, and IV C,

40

Table 31. Ratio of Title I/Chapter 1 Average Per PupilExpenditure to Overall Average Per Pupil Expenditure

1979-80Ratio Rank

1982-83Ratio Rank

Alabama 0.37 2 0.28 8

Alaska U.23 40 0.15 49Arizona 0.22 42 0.24 20

Arkansas 0.34 8 0.3U 5

California 0.14 51 0.10 51

Colorado U.27 27 0.24 19Connecticut 0.18 50 0,20 37

Delaware U.22 43 0.23 25Florida 0.31 12 0.23 23Georgia 0.33 11 0.32 3Hawaii 0.31 13 0.22 31

Idaho 0.26 31 0.25 16Illinois 0.30 23 0.30 6

Indiana U.19 49 0.16 47

Iowa 0.24 33 0.20 39Kansas 0.24 36 0.17 46Kentucky 0.31 15 0.25 17Louisiana 0.31 16 0.28 9

Maine 0.23 38 0.18 42

Maryland 0.31 18 0.22 30

Massachusetts 0.24 32 0.22 27Michigan 0.27 2b 0.26k 14Minnesota 0.24 37 0.21 36Mississippi 0.35 5 0.32 2

Missouri 0.3U 22 0.23 26Montana U.30 20 0.23 41

Nebraska 0.26 29 0.22 28Nevada 0.31 14 0.23 42New Hampshire 0.30 19 0.21 34

New Jersey 0.19 47 0.I1 50

New Mexico 0.36 3 0.28 IC)

New York 0.24 34 0.18 41

North Carolina 0.34 9 0.27 11

Worth Dakota 0.42 1 0.24 18Ohio 0.29 24 0.26 13Oklahoma U.22 41 U.19 4U

Oregon 0.20 46 0.17 44

Pennsylvania U.19 48 0.15 48Rhode Islam! 0.21 44 U.21 33

Fuum Carolina 0.35 b U.42 1

Suuti: Dakota 0.33 1U 0.29 7

Tennessee 0.29 25 0.22 24Texas 0.23 39 0.20 36

Utah U.26 3U 0.25 15Vermont 0.24 35 0.17 45

Virginia U.3U 21 U,27 12Washington 0.20 45 0.18 43Went Virginia 0.36 4 0.31 4

Wisconsio 0.24. 28 0.21 35

Wyoming 0.34 7 0.23 24

District of Columbia 0.31 17 0,21 32

k 1981-82 data were used to estimte 1982-83 data for Michigan.

41

Table 32. Enrollment in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools

1979-80 1982-03Enfollmant Rank Enrollment Rank

Alabama 754.181 22 724.037 20Alaska 88,573 51 89.41J 51

Arizona 509.252 29 50,294 27Arkansas 453,125 32 432.565 32California 4,047,550 I 4.065,404 1

Colorado 550,527 27 545,209 213

Connecticut 566,634 26 404,470 14Delaware 104.035 40 412,646 48Florida 1,508,337 6 1,404,734 8

Georgia 1,070,462 12 1,053,4E14 11Hawaii 160,660 41 162,024 40Idaho 202,758 39 202,973 39Illinois 2,043,239 4 1,880,289 4Indiana 1,003,826 11 999,542 12Iowa 548,317 28 504,903 26Kansas 422,924 33 407,074 33Kentucky 477,123 23 651,4)84 23Louisiana 800,435 18 775,664 18Maine 227,823 38 211.986 30Maryland 777,725 20 699,201 22Massachusetts 1,035.724 13 906,904 14Mic,igan 1,860.490 7 1.741,521 7

Minnesota 778,054 i9 715,190 21Mississippi 402,039 30 408,294 30Missouri 872,933 15 602,535 lbMontana 158,208 42 152,335 42Nebraska 207,288 36 269,009 36Nevada 147,734 44 151,104 43New Hampshire 170.546 4U 16U,197 4iNew Jarsey 1,287,809 9 1,172,520 9

New Mexico 275,572 37 268,432 37New York 2,969,216 2 2,718,678 3

North Carolina 1,150.053 10 1,096,815 1UNorth Dakota 117,488 46 117,078 46Ohio 2,025,256 5 1,660,245 5

Oklahoma 583,458 25 593,825 25Oregon 467,120 31 446,184 31Pennsylvania 1,968,801 6 1,783,909 6Rhode IsInnd 154,098 43 139,342 44

South Carolina 624,795 24 600,51B 24

Souru Dakota 113.840 45 123,897 45IonneSnee 64,4./17 16 828.21,4 15Texas 2,072,714 3 2,905.054Utan 333,049 35 170,163 35

Vermont 90,330 49 91,454 49Virginia 1,031,403 14 975,727 13Washington 764,679 21 739,215 19West Virginia 300.398 34 375,115 34Wisconsin 057,855 17 784,830 17Wyoming 95,505 50 101,645 47

District of Columbia 06 156 47 11.10 5U

Totale 41,578,465 39,643,476

4

Table 33. Enrollment in Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Schoolsaad Percent of Total Enrollment Ln Nonpublic Schools

1980-81NonpublicEnrollment Rank

PercentNonpublic Rank

Alabama 62,009 21 7.b 29Alaska 3,800 50 4.2 45Arizona 40,201 28 7.3 34Arkansas 18,423 38 4.0 46California 513,709 2 11.1 18Colorado 35,250 31 6.1 39Connecticut 88,404 17 14.3 11Delaware 23,374 35 19.0 1

Florida 204,988 8 12.0 16Georgia 82,505 18 7.2 35Hawaii 37,147 30 18.4 2

Idaho 5,839 48 2.8 49

Illioois 349,463 4 13.0 10Lodia::a 100,234 15 8.7 25Iowa 55,227 25 9.4 24Kansas 33,889 32 7.5 30Kentucky 69,728 21 9.4 23Louisiana 158,921 10 17.0 5

Maine 17,540 40 7.3 33Maryland 106,447 i4 12.4 13Massachusetts 138,333 12 11.9 17Michigan 211,871 7 10.2 21Minnesota 88,960 16 10.3 2UMississippi 50,116 26 9.5 22MiSsouri 126,319 13 13.0 12Montana 7,668 45 4.7 43Nebraska 38,574 29 12.1 14Nevada 6,599 47 4.2 44

New Hampshire 20,721 37 11.0 19New Jersey 229.878 6 15,0 9New Mexico 18,027 39 4.2 38New York 579.670 1 18.8 6

North Carolina 58,078 23 4.9 41North Dakota 10,659 44 8.4 26Ohio 268.357 5 12 1 15Oklahoma 16,335 41 2.7 50

Oregon 27,848 34 5.7 40Pennsylvania 402,058 3 17.4 4

Runde Island 29.875 33 10.8 7

South Carolina 44,1119 27 7.4 31

SOUW Dakota LU.d98 43 7.8 27

Lenn..18See 71,617 20 7.7 28Texas 148,334 11 4.9 42Utah 5,555 49 1.6 51Vermont 7.555 46 7.3 32Virginia 75,009 19 4.9 Jb

Washington 55,950 24 b.9 37West Virginia 12,608 42 3.2 47

Wisconsin 164,361 9 18.4 8

Wyoming 3,036 51 3.0 40

District of Columbia 21 203 36 17.5 3

Total 4,961,755

4

.4

Table 34. Enrollment in Religiously Affiliated Elementary andSecondary Schoole and Percent of Nonpublic Karollmunt

in Religiously Affiliated Schools

198U-81ReligiouslyAffiliatedEnrollment Rank

PercentReligious

Affiliatinn Rank

Alabama 38.016 24 60.7 45Alaska 3,2J2 5U 85.1 23Arizona 29,315 28 72.6 J7Arkansas 13,228 39 71.8 36California 410,575 2 79.9 30Colorado 27,943 29 79.4 32Connecticut 67,399 17 76.2 34Delaware 19,022 35 81.4 20Florida 154,904 9 75.6 35Georgia 38,052 23 46.1 50Hawaii 23,981 12 64.6 43Idaho 5.462 47 93.5 bLllinois 323.681 4 92.6 9

Indiana 92,601 14 91.6 10Iowa 53,885 19 97.6 1

Kansas 30,375 27 6 15Kentucky 58,69. 18 1,4.2 24Louisiana 128,745 11 81.0 29Maine 9,538 42 54.4 48Maryland 67,558 15 82.3 27Massachusetts 109.928 13 79.5 31Michigan 195,893 7 92.5 IIMinnesota 84,525 16 95.0 4

Mississippi 19,780 34 39.5 51Missouri 117,462 12 93.0 8Montana b,743 45 87.9 lbNebraska 37,207 25 96.5 2Nevada 5,655 4o 85.7 20New Hampshire 14,835 37 7i.6 39New Jersey 206,415 6 89.8 14New Mexico 12.854 40 71.3 40New York 506,976 1 87.6 18North Carolina 33,473 26 57.6 46North Dakota 9,068 44 85.3 22Ohio 254,063 5 94.7 5

OklabOta 14,117 38 86.4 19Oregon 2J,769 33 85.4 21Pennsylvania 3b2,08() 3 90.1 13Rhode Island 27.232 30 91.2 isSouth Laroltna 25,265 SI 50.9 44South Dakota 9.108 43 83.6 26lenneSsee 50,623 20 71.0 41Texas 130,540 10 87,9 17Utah 3,693 49 ob.5 42Vermont 4,291 48 56.8 47Virginia 48,262 21 64.3 44Washington 47,049 22 84.1 2SWest Virginia 11,768 41 93.3 7

Wiaconsin 156,301 8 9b.3 3

Wyoming 2,276 51 75.0 3bDistrict of Columbia 16,567 3o 78.1 33

Total 4,166,495

Table 35. Total Enrollment in Elementary and Secondary Schools

198U-81focal

Enrollment Rank

Alabama 821,390 21Alaska 90,314 $1Arizona 554,051 29Arkansas 466,123 32California 4,631,731 1Colorado 381,283 28Connecticut b19.863 1,

Vclaware 122.777 47Florida 1,715.215 6Georgia 1,151,242 13Hawaii 202,215 40Idaho 209,086 39Illinois 2,332,926 4Indiana 1,155,823 12Iona $89,084 27Kansas 449,180 33Kentucky 739,526 23Louisiana 93(,481 17Maine 240,037 38Maryland 851.112 19Massacnusette 1,160,218 11Michigan 2,075,290 7

Minnesota 843,284 20Mississippi 527,175 30Missouri 970,967 LbMontano 162,861 43

Nebraska 319,004 36

Nevada 156,080 44New Hampshire 187,953 41New Jersey 1,475,886 9New Mexico 289,225 31

New York 3,450,674 2

North Carolina 1,187,454 10North Dakota 127,544 46Ohio 2,225,738 6Oklahoma 594,142 26Oregon 492,427 31Pennsylvania 2,311,350 5

Khode Island 178,195 42South corolina 668,842 24

South Dakota 139,40 45fennessee 925,186 181exae 3,048,607 3

Utah 349,17) 35Vermont 103,37U 49Virginia 1,085,440 i4Washington 813,589 22West Virginia 396,111 34Wisconsin 992,608 15Wyoming 101,34i 50District of Columbia 121,2$2 48

Total 45,945,848

45

TabLe 36. Per Capita

1979Per Capita Intone

income

Rank Pe-

1984Capita income Rank

Alabama 6,855 48 9.981 47

Alaska 11,585 17,155Arizooa 8,011 34 11,029 J3Arkansas 6,639 50 9,714 49California 9,951 4 14,344 6

Colorado 9,083 Is 13,742 9

Connecticut 10,296 3 16,369 3

Delaware 9,015 ib 11,545 11

Florida 8,257 28 12,553 22Georgia 7,377 38 11.441 35

Hawaii 9,141 14 12,761 17

Idaho 7,375 39 10,174 45Illinois 9,741 7 13,728 10Indiana 8,353 27 11,799 31Iowa 8,689 2U 12,090 30Kansas 9,145 13 13,319 12Kentucky 7,095 45 10,374 42

Louisiana 7,458 37 10,850 37

Mains 6,959 47 10,678 40Maryland 9,313 10 14,111 8Massachusetts 9,014 17 14,574 5

Michigan 9,239 11 12,518 23

Minneoata 8,890 18 13,219 13

Mississippi 6,102 51 8,857 51

mLssouti 8,242 30 12.129 29Montana 7,545 35 10,21b 44

Nebraska 8,464 2b 12,280 28Nevada 9,929 5 13,216 14

New Hampshire 8,255 29 13,148 15

New Jersey 9,708 8 15,282 4

New Mexico 7,207 41 10,330 43New York 9,177 12 14,121North Carolina 7,104 43 10,758 38

North Dakota 6,017 33 12,461 24

Ohio 8,672 22 12,314 2b

Oklahoma 8,328 J2 11,745 32Oregon 8,682 21 11,582 34

Pennsylvania 8,513 23 12,343 25

Rhode island 8,200 31 12,710 18South Carolina 6,719 49 10,075 4bSouth Dakota 7,497 JO 11,049 J6Tennensee 7,080 40 10,400 41Texas 8,478 25 12,636 2Utits!' 7,106 42 9,719 50Vermont 7,266 40 10,692 39

Virginia 9,483 24 13,067 16Washington 9,4.39 9 12,728 19

Nest Virginia 7,100 44 9,846 48Wisconsin 8,701 19 12,389 27

Wyoming 9,843 6 12,58o 21

District of Columbia 10,896 2 16,845

45

fable 36. Per Capita

1979Per Capita Income

Income

Rank1984

Per Capita Income Rank

Alabama 4,455 48 9,981 47Alaska 11,585 1 17,155 1Arizona 8,011 34 11,629 33Arkansas 6,639 54 9,724 49California 9,951 4 14,344 to

Colorado 9,043 15 13,742 9Connecticut 10,294 J 16,369 3Delaware 9,015 lb 13,545 11Florida 8,257 2B 12,553 22Georgia 7,377 38 11,441 35Hawaii 9,141 14 12,761 17Idaho 7,375 39 10,174 45Illinois 9,741 7 13,728 10Indiana 8,353 27 11,799 31Iowa 8,689 2U 12,090 30Kansas 9,145 13 13.319 12Kentucky 7,095 45 10,374 42Louisiana 7,458 37 10,850 37Maine 6,959 47 10,678 4UMaryland 9,313 10 14,111 8Massachusetts 9,014 17 14,574 5Michigan 9,239 LI 12,518 23Minnesota 6,490 18 13,219 13Mississippi 6,102 51 8,857 51Missouri 8,242 30 12,129 29Montana 7,545 35 10,216 44Nebraska 4,464 26 1Z,280 28Nevada 9,929 5 13,216 14New Hampshire 4,255 29 13,148 15New Jersey 9,708 8 15,282 4New Mexico 7,207 41 10,330 43New Yotk 9,177 12 14,121 7North Carolina 7,104 4.i 10,758 3BNorth Dakota 8,017 33 12,461 24Ohio 8,672 22 12,314 26Oklahoma 8,028 32 11,745 32Oregon 8,582 21 11,582 34Pennsylvania 8,513 23 12,343 25Rhude Island 8,200 it 12,730 laSouth Cardina 6,719 49 10,075 4bSouth Uaklta 7,497 Jo 11,049 JOTennes,;ee 7,080 4o 10,40U 41Texas v.476 25 12,6.l4 20Utah 7,106 42 9,714 5UVermont 7,2o6 4U 10,692 89Virginia 8,485 24 13,067 loWashington 9,4J9 9 12,728 19West Virginia 7,100 44 9,846 40Wisconsia 8,701 19 12,309 27Wyoming 9,843 6 12,506 21District of Columbia 10,496 2 16,845 2

4t,

Table 37. RTS Tax Capacity Index

National Average 100 IUDNational Average 00100

47

National Average 100 IUD

k

76 7449.51Alabama 49.5TAlaska 217 I 312Arizona 91 37.51 96Arkansas 77 4$ 79

2.77.51.

California 118 5 llb 9

Colorado 110 91 121 bConnecticut 109 III 117 7.51Delaware 110 9T 115Florida 100 26f 104

1,1-51

Georgia 81 45.57 B4 42.5rHawaii 103 211. 117

7)Idaho 91 37.51 86 4(T1Illinois 112 7 91 241Indiana 96 29 159 361

Loma 100 96 27.51Kaaaa0 109 112451 106Kentucky 45 82 1T1:::f

Louisiana 10441.51

113 14Malns 80

18.5147 84 42.51

Maryland 99 28 NONmesachusects 93 34T 101Michigan 10 93

11.5T

30Minnesota 105

18.5T17 99 241

Mississippi 70 51 71 51

MiSaouri 97 3U 91 34

Montana 113 to 110 15Nebraska 1U0 261 97 26Nevada 154 3 151 3New Hampshire 94 31 IOUNew Jersey 102 23 106New Mexico 103 21T 115

ft:'5.;

11.51New York 89 39 91 32TNurrh Catalina 4/ 44 81 44.5/North Dakota 109 121 115Ohio 1U1 24 92 3/:151

Oklahoma 108 14.51 12b 5

Oregoo 100 16 94 241Pennsylvania 93 34T 89 36TRhode Island 84 43 81 46South Carolina Jo 49.31 7.

45 32 87

49.5TSouth UakataTennessee Ell 45.51 77

117 4 130i3

1

4=9 U? 4U t, 40.)IVermont 85 41.51 itlf

Virginia 93 34f 0 29WashinGoa 1.0 2IT 1U2 i9West Virginia 92 3b 92 321Wisconsin i00 26T U7

Wyoming 173 2 201District of Columbia 110 9T 115

3:.5T

11.51

47

IUD

Table 38. Number of Handicapped Children Served Under P.L. 94-142

1979-b0 1982-83Number Rank Kumber Rank

Alabama 71,124 20 80,469 19Alaska 7,999 50 9,025 49Arizona 47,2U2 28 50,663 28Arkansas 40,138 31 45,424 it)

California 351,111 1 361,U47 1

Colorado 41,635 29 41,287 32ConnectiCut 59,506 24 62,928 25Delawate 11,910 42 11,245 46Florida 129,552 9 147,567 8Georgia 99,229 i2 104.474 12Hawaii 10,501 44 12,1' 43Idaho 17,491 39 17,260 40Illinois 219,103 3 221,361 4Indiana 92,072 14 92,965 16Iowa 58,010 26 55,329 27Kansas 36,784 33 42,227 31Kentucky 64,448 22 70,022 22Louisiana 79,452 19 80,532 18Maine 22,782 37 24,329 18Maryland 90,039 16 88,076 17Massachuaetts 128,009 10 124,161 10Michigan 143,913 7 145,375 9

Minnesota 81,442 LB 745,990 20Mississippi 41,117 JO 4),515 29Missouri 9.1,320 13 96.992 15Montana 12.284 41 14,782 4iNebraska 29,410 36 30,023 36Nevada 10,830 43 12,707 42New Hampshire 8,957 4B 12.074 44New Jersey 141,994 8 157,016 7

New Mexico 19,974 36 25,331 37New York 197,863 4 234,114 3North Carolina 109,651 ii. 116,294 11North Dakota 9.219 47 10,314 47Ohio 188,393 5 192,214 5Oklahoma 59,113 25 63,995 24Oregon 39,464 32 41,052 34Pennsylvania 174,931 6 177,9135 b

Rhode island 15,322 4U 18,140 39South Carolina 69,758 21 70,386 21South Dakota 9,272 --. 11,300 45Tennessee 91,394 15 104,623 13leaus 252,893 2 272,999 2Utah 34,847 44 37,384 J5Vermont 10,139 43 7,0511 50Virginia 87,694 17 97,a56 14Washington 51,166 27 60,837 26West Virginia 32,868 35 41,138 33Wisconsin 63.317 21 69,926 23Wyoming 8,849 49 9,837 48DIsttlet of Colmmlia 2 079----4--- 51 51

Totals 3,773,496

_1,950

4,010,786

Table 39. Number of Handicapped Children Served Under P.L. 89-313

1979-80Number Rank

1982-83Number Rank

Alabama 1,254 37 1.140 40Alaska 2.243 29 2,992 23.5EArizona 1,101 3B 1,199 39Arkansas 4,884 13 3.580 lbCalifornia 4,422 i5 3.471 ldColorado 3,593 18 3,839 ISConnecticut 3,045 22 3,082 22Delaware 2,524 26 3,160 19Florida 7,411 9 8,042 6Georgia 2.618 25 2,8131 25Hawaii 461 43 715 42Idaho 575 46 413 51Illinois 31,360 1 38,408 1

Indiana 6,746 10 7,263 9Iowa 959 41 lbt) 41Kansas 1,944 3U 1,432 30Kentucky 2,639 24 3,148 21Louisiana 0,166 11 5,477 10Maine 1,525 34 1,656 32Maryland 3,724 16 2,603 26Massachusetts 13,860 5 14,317 5

Michigan 11,472 7 10.396 6

Minnesota 904 42 668 43Mississippi 1,313 35 1,308 35Missouri 3,314 2U 2,942 23.5?Montana 497 50 433 49Nebraska 55U 48 425 5UNevada 377 51 619 44New Hampshire 3,67U 17 2,U69 24New Jersey 7,584 8 4,465 12New Mexico 505 49 503 4bNew York 20,724 2 30,521 2North Carolina 5,243 12 4,292 13North Dakota 557 47 488 47Ohio 12.959 0 10,02U 7

Oklahoma 1,084 31 1,824 31Oregon 4,681 14 5,149 11Pennsylvania 15,313 3 18,372 3Rhode island 749 44 443 48South Carolina 1.708 32 1,319 3bSouth Dakota 578 45 541 45Tennessee 1,610 43 1.408 3,4

Texas 14,719 4 16,344 4

Utah 1,280 Jo 1,5254 33Vermont 2,265 28 1,156 28Virginia 3,357 19 3,157 10WaahingtOn 2,883 23 3,458 17West Virginia 1,096 39 1,282 38Wisconsin 2,294 27 2,293 27

Wyoming 1,024 40 1.307 37District of Columbia 3 138 21 3 853 14

Totals

---L---

231,774

--L.---

244,607

49

S,J

Table 40, Percentby P.L. 94-142

of iota' School Enrollment Servedand P.L. 89-314 Combined

1980 -81Percent handicapped Rank

Alabama 9.29 25Alaska 11.46 5Arizona 9.24 26Arkansas 10.53 12California 7.84 41Colorado 8.37 37Connecticut 10.82Delaware 11.74 2Florida 8.43 36Georgia 9.73 20Hawaii 5.94 50Idaho 8.05 40Illinois 10.59 11Indiana 8.56 35Iowa 10.46 15Kansas 9.05 30Renrueky 9.55 23Louisiana 8.03 32Maine 10.68 10Maryland 11.51 4

Massachusetts 12.20 1

Michigan 7.52 44Minnesota 9.57 22Mississippi B.02 33Missouri 10.41 £4Montana 8.24 39Nebraska 9.64 21Nevada 7.55 43New Hampshire b.66 49New Jersey 10.74 7New Mexico 8.31 30New York 6.67 48North Carolina 10.02 10North Dakota 7.39 45Onlo 9.34 24Oklahoma 10.70 8Oregon 9.10 28Pennsylvania 8.57 34Rhode island 9.66 19South Carolina 10.46 13South Umtata 7.2J 46fennesmee 10.29 16fazas 9.05 29Utah 10.28 i/

Vermont 11.67Virginia 9.02 31Washington 7.01. 42West Virginia 9.23 27Wisconsin 7.05 47Wyoming 10.69 9District of Columbia 5.20 51

5U

sable 41. Percent of Children

Alabama

Aged 5-17 Limitcd-Engliah-Proficient

1980Percent LEP ;Lank

U.1 50kiaska 1.7 7

Arizona 3.0 i

Arkansas 0.1 4vCalifornia 1.9 bColorado 1.0 14Connecticut 1.2 12Delaware 0.5 24

Florida 1.3 11Georgia 0.2 41Hawaii 2.1 4

Idaho 0.5 21

Illinois 1.4 9

Indiana 0.3 32Iowa 0.3 35Kansas 0.5 23Kentucky 0.2 47

Louisiana 0.5 20Maine 0,4 27

Maryland 0.5 25Massachusetts 1.1 13Michigan 0.3 31Minnesota 0.4 26Mississippi U.2 4b

Missouri 0.2 40Montana U.3 39Nebraska 0.3 37Nevada 1.0 15New Hampshire 0.3 38New Jersey 1.5 8New Mexico 4.1 1

New York 2.0 5

North Carolina 0.2 42North Dakota 0.2 43Ohio 0.4 3UOklahoma 0.4 28

Oregon 0.7 19Pennsylvania 0.5 22Rhode island 1.4 10

South Carolina 0.2 44South Uaeora U-1 34

Itnnessee (1.2 45

Iux4S 4.0 .2

Utah 0.7 18

Vet-, ont u.1 48

Virginia 0.4 29

Washington 0.9 lbWest Virginia 0.1 51

Wisconsin U.1 JsWyoming U.1 36District of Columbia U.7 17

Si

A

Table 42. School Enrollment by Race

Percent

White Rank

Percent

Black Rank

Percent Asian

anti Pacific

Islander Rank

Percent American

Indian/Eskimo/

Aleut Rank

Alabama 68.1 45 3L.4 6 0.2 )1 0.3 14

Alaska 13.0 40 3.3 36 1.d 7 21.4 1

Arizona 77.6 33 3.4 15 U.9 16 3.1 4

Arkansas 77.8 32 21.2 10 0.3 45 0.6 21

California 71.9 41 6.3 28 5.9 2 1.2 16

Colorsdo 87.1 23 4.3 31 1.2 U 0.9 i8

Connecticut 86.9 25 9,5 22 0.7 22 0.2 41

OeLaware 76.9 34 21.0 11 0.9 16 0.4 33

Florida 76.8 35 20.7 12 0.8 21 0.1 34

Georgia 67.0 46 32.2 5 0.4 38 0.2 44

Hawaii 30.5 50 1.3 42 65.1 1 0.3 15

Mann 95.1 7 0.3 50 0.7 26 1.5 ii

Illinois 76.4 36 18.8 14 1.5 11 0.2 42

Indiana 89.2 20 9.4 23 0.5 35 0.2 43

Iowa 96.7 4 1.9 39 0.6 29 0.3 3U

Kansas 89.8 19 6.8 17 0.9 17 0.9 20

Kentucky 91.5 17 B.0 26 0.3 46 0.1 51

Louisiana 63.5 47 35.2 4 0,7 28 0.3 28

Maine 98.9 2 0.3 48 0.3 50 0.5 Li

Maryland 10.2 44 21.3 8 1.8 4 0.2 37

Massachusetts 91.9 15 5.0 30 0.9 19 0.2 39

Michigan 82.0 28 15.7 17 0.7 25 0.7 21

Minnesota 95.6 6 1.6 41 1.0 14 1.3 15

Mississippi 55.8 49 43.5 2 0.3 47 0.3 29

Missouri 85.4 26 13.5 19 0.5 31 0.3 32

Montana 91.9 16 0.2 51 0.4 40 7.0 6

Nebraska 93.5 13 4.1 32 0.5 30 0.9 19

Nevada 84.2 27 9.3 24 1.9 4 1.3 9

New Hampshire 98.9 3 0.5 45 0.3 42 U.1 47

New Jersey 78.8 31 16.3 16 1.6 9 U.I 45

New Mexico 71.7 42 2.0 38 0.5 34 10.3 2

Hew York 75.6 38 16.8 15 1.9 5 0.3 31

North Carolina 70.4 43 27.6 7 0.4 39 1.5 14

North Dakota 94.2 9 0.3 46 0.3 48 4.8 7

Ohio 87.0 24 11.8 20 0.5 33 U.4 25

Oklahoma 81.8 29 8.6 25 0.7 23 1.8 5

Oregon 93.6 12 1.8 4U 1.7 8 1.6 12

Pennsylvania 87.5 22 10.8 21 0.7 27 0.1 49

Rhode Island 93.7 11 3.9 33 0.7 24 0.5 24

South Carolina 61.9 48 37.3 3 0.5 37 0.2 40

South Dakota 89.0 21 0.3 49 0.3 49 10.2 3

Tennessee 79.9 30 19.6 13 0.3 44 0.1 46

Texas 75.4 39 14.1 18 0.9 15 0.3 27

Dm 94.1 10 0.6 44 1.4 12 2.0 11

Vermont 99.0 1 0.3 47 0.4 41 0.2 38

Virginia 15.7 37 12.1 9 1.5 10 0.4 26

Washington 90.2 18 3.0 37 2.9 3 2.0 10

West Virginia 95.9 5 3.6 14 0.3 43 0.1 50

Wisconsin 92.5 14 5.5 29 0.5 32 0.9 17

Wyoming 94.3 8 0.7 43 0.5 36 2,4 8

Dhartel oi 1:ulumbla 11.5 51 86.7 1 0.8 20 0.1 48

flu

Table 43. Percent of School Enrollment of Spanish Origin

1980Percent

Spanish Origin Lank

Alabama 1.0 39

Alaska 2.4 24

Arizona 22.2 4

Arkansas 0.9 41

California 25.5 3

Colorado 14.1 5

Connecticut 5.9 13

Delaware 2.3 26

Florida 9.6 8

Georgia 1.2 35

Hawaii 10.2 7

Idaho 4.9 15

Minato 6.9 11Indiana 2.1 27

Iowa 1.3 34

Kansas 3.7 17

Kentucky 0.8 44

Louisiana 2.6 21

Maine 0-6 51Maryland 1.7 30

Massachusetts 3.5 19Michigan 2.3 25

Minnesota 1.1 38

Mississippi 1.2 37

Missouri 1.4 31

Montana 0.8 46

Nebraska 2.6 22

Nevada 8.6 10

New Hampshire 0.7 47

Kew Jersey 4.6 9

New MaAIC0 43.9 1

New York 11.8 6

North Carolina 1.0 40North Dakota U.7 48

Ohio 1.5 32

Oklahoma 2.6 20

Oregon 3.5 18Pennsylvania 1.8 28Rhode Island 2.8 23

South Carolina 1.2 38

South Dakota U.7 50Tennessee U.8 43

fesas 27.3 2

Utah 4.9 14

Vermont 0.7 49

Virginia 1.7 31

Washington 4.0 lbbest Virginia 0.8 45

Wisconsin 1.8 29

Wyoming b.4 12

District of Columbia U.9 42

53

Table 44.

Alabama

Percent of Children Aged 5-L7

1980Percent Poverty

Ages S -17

in Poverty

Rank

S.5I23.1Alaska 11.4 38Arizona 15.8 17Arkansas 22.7 5California 14.2 22Colorado 10.8 41TConnecticut 10.4 44Delaware 14.b 10Florida 17.7 lbGeorgia 2u.5 9

Hawaii 11.7 3bIdaho 13.4 26Illinois 14.1 23Indiana 11.0 39Iowa 10.8 41TKansas 10.7 43Kentucky 21.2 7

Louisiana 23.1 3.5IMaine 15.1 18.5TMaryland 11.9 35Massachusetts 12.3 33Michigan 12.4 32

Minnesota 9.5 48Mississippi 30.4 1

Missouri 14.0 24.5rMontana 12.7 30Nebraska 11.6 37Nevada 9.4 49New Hampshire 0.9 50New Jersey 13.3 27New Mexico 21.) 0New Yotk 17.9 14

North Carolina 17.8 15Norch Dakota 14.0 24.5fOhio 12.2 34Oklahoma 15.1 18.alOregon 10.8 41fPennsylvania 13.2 lbRhode Island 12.o 31

South Carolina 20.7 B

South Dakota 19.4 11Tennessee 20.2 1U

Texas 18.4 12Utah ,J.ti 40Vermont 13.0 29Virginia 14,4 21

Washington 10.3 45West Virginia 18.2 13Wisconsin 9.o 47

hyumln 7.5 51District of Columbia 26.3 2

54

ALA8MA

Title 1/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Taal allocation

futal LEA grants

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars


State administration set aside per operating LEA

LEA child count for formula purposes

title 1/Chapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants

Number of participants K-6

Number of participants 7-12

Number of nonpublic participants

Percent of all nonpublic school students

in Title i/Chapter 1

Number of public participants

Percent of all public school students

Title 1/Chapter 1

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

English-proficient

Percent of students

services

Percent of students

guidance services

served

served In

receiving reading

receiving math

receiving laoguage arts

receiving Eoglish for limited-

receiving health and nutrition

receiving attendance and

fitle I /Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members

Number of FIE teachers

Number of FIE aides

Number of FIE administrative staff

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio

fitie I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

Instructional settings: Pullouts predominate io

LEAs although SEA does not encourage or discourage

thee

Schooluide projects: gone repurted by SEA

1979-30 Host Kecent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount. Rank Amuunt 'tank Year

$/4,541,252 Id $0,205,06 14 1944-8) -12.)

b71,76/,310 li 1)6404,71J 1) 1944-4) -1J-I

146,350,510 li 1942-83 -32.1)

442,071,111 15 1.944-d5 -40.0

$1,1111,624 1.1 1;611,284 14 1944-45 -44.5

48,04 10 34,726 13 1944-d) -44.9

/75,o22 IL 199,567 13 19d4-d5 -47.o

130,844 14 110,943 14 1931 -63 -15.1

115,e/9 10 100,846 1U 1984-43 ALS15,/20 22 10,U97 14 1962-d3 -101,121 L5 985 13 193/-3J -19.3

(not available) 1.3 43 1980-d1

129,628 14 109,95d 14 1964-d3 -15.2

17.2 o 15.2 7 1982-43

81.8 2i 43.o 12 1982-43

J2.2 32 28.8 3b 1962-8.1

U.J 4i 2.9 .il 1962-di

<OA 17 NA 1982-83

46.1 4 26.6 6 1982-63

23,4 6 29.2 7 1964-83

3,146 /4 3,445 Is 1982-8.1 9.5

45)5 10 2,04; 11 1981-83 -18.3

146 48 917 2U 1982-83 526.1

107 17 93 V 1432-83 -13.1

41.6 50 32.2 37 1982-di -22.6

044 11 $569 31 1964-0 7.5

1944-45

19d4-45

55

CI A,

Alabama (continued)

1979-0 Most decent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Kans. Year


Number of operating LEAs 127 J0 128 Jb 1182-8J 0,8

Overall average per pupil expend!torP 51,40 50 52,978 42 1182-81 41.5

Overall average per pupil expendiAre in Adjusted

1979,80 dollars $1,)J7 42 1982-8J 4.b

Enrollment in public elementary aid secondary

schools 754,181 11 714,037 1U 1182-03 -4,U

Enrollment in nonpublic elemental.; and secondary

schools to10A9 12 1980 -01

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 7.0 29 1988-61

Enrollment in religiously affiliated elementary

and secondaty schools J8,01b 24 1980-81

Percent of nonpublic enrollment in religiously

affiliated schools 60.1 45 1980-81

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 821,190 21 1980-81

Per capita income $6,855 48 19,981 47 1984 45,o

EIS tax capacity index lb 49.)1 74 49.)f lltit


Number of handicapped children served under

P.L. 94-142 71,114 20 80,4b9 19 1982-83 13.1


P.L. 89-313 1,254 37 1,140 40 1982-83 -9.1

Percent of total school enrollment served by

P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 9.3 25 1900-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-English-

proficient U.1 50 1980


Percent White 58.1 45 1980

Percent Black 31.4 e 198U

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander U.2 >1 1980

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.3 3o 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 1.0 39 1980

Percent of children aged 5-17 In poverty DA 3.)f 1980

Distribution of children in poverty across LEAs

Percent of Children

Percent of Districts in Poverty

5.5 0 -1033.1 11 - 10

J4.7 21 - 3d

17.3 31 - 4U

9.4 N 4U

Percent poor children in State In LLA with largest enrollment 9.0 Mobile County

Percent poor children in State In 5 largest LEAs 29.7 Mobile county, Jefferaun County tErminghaml,

Sirmlrigham City, Montgomery County, Uuncsville City

50 ),

Alabama (continued)

other State Programs


No program


Standards set at the State level

Grades assessed: 3, 6, 9, 11

Expected uses: high school graduation, remediatIon

First graduating class assessed: 1985


Alabama does not have a planning requirement nor does it sponsor any effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder program is under consideration. Testing is required for initial certification. Those

who change fields must pass a subject area test in the new field. Temporary certificates are given to

qualified college graduates who can teach math or science.

57

3

1979-40 Most kecent Year

Mama Hank Amouhr Aanx Year

Percent

Change

titiei/Opoter 1 Allocation Data

Total Allocation $7,142,051 0 $8,168,102 48 1984 -85 5.4

Total. LEA grants $5,o81,315 47 $5,0o2,539 50 1984-n5 -10.9

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1919-80 dollars 53,721,021 41 1982-83 -34.4

S3,505,913 A 1984-85 -48.3

State administration set aside 5225,UOU 44.51 $225,000 43,51 1984-85 u

Stare administration set aside per operating LEA 14,127 22 34,245 11 1984.85 -1.9

LEA child count for formula purposes 14,364 49 1U,b43 50 198c-85 -c6.0


Total number of participants 5,482 5U 4,564 50 1982-83 -ie.?

Number of participants K-0 3,495 51 3,248 51 19d2-83 -7.1

Number of participants 7-12 1,734 45 1,032 48 1982-83 -31.0

Number of nonpublic participants 87 49.51 93 41 1982-0 6.9

Percent of all nonpublic school students served

In Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 2.7 3. 1980-81

!limber of public participants 5,395 50 4,471 A 1902-83 -17.1

Percent of all public school students served in

Title i /Chapter 1 0.1 48 5.0 47 1982-83

Percent of students receiving teading 67.6 41 73.3 37 1942-83 -Percent of students receiving math 50.1 9 34.0 27 1982-43 --

Percent of students receiving language arts 28.4 4 9.0 17 1982-83

Percent of students receiving English for limited-

English-proficient 7.1 6 14.0 4 1982-83

Percent of students receiving health and nutrition

services 1.3 30 NA 1942-83

Percent of students receiving attendance and

guidance services

lithe i/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

21.5 14 2.2 32 1982-84

Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 244 49 173 50 1982-83 -19.1

Number of ITE teachers 84 51 57 51 1982-83 -42.1

Number of FTE aides 139 49 85 48 1982-83 -38.8

Number of FIE administrative staff 8 44 6 44 1941-0J -25.0

Title 1/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 22.5 20 2o.4 25 1982-83 17.3

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 11,036 1 $1,104 1 1982-43 0.0

Instructional settings: It is not known if

pullouts predominate; SEA does nor encourage or

discourage them 1984-n5

Schoolwtde projects: None reported by SFA 1984-0

mmommonmmEnmb,

Alaska (continued)

...1975-0 Most Recent ?ely

Amndet & roc Amount dark Year

Percent

Clarke

State CharacteristIck

SZ

54,548

88,573

43

1

51

53

S7,244

S5,J58

89,413

J,OUU

43

1

1

51

SU

1982-83

198L-83

1981-8j

14e1-83

1980-61

' '.;

59.J

17.8

1).9

Number of operating LF.ns

Overal! average p.-: pupil egpenditvre

0.trall aver4e per pupil exnenditure in adjust' 1

1972-60 dollars

Enrollment in public elementary and secori."7

schools

Enrollment la nonpsblic elementary and eecondary

schools

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 4.2 4) 1980-81

Enrollment in religiously affillatcd elementary

and secondary schools 3,232 JO 1980 -61



Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schonV 51 L9811-81

Per capita income 311,565 1 $910C 1 1984 48.i

ATS tax capacity index 217 1 312 1 1982



P.L. 94-142

number of handicapped children served under

7,999 50 9,025 49 1982-03 12.0

P.Z. 89-31J 2,243 29 2,992 23.57 1982-03 J3.4


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 11.5 5 1980 -S1


proficient 1.7 7 1960


Percent White 73.0 40

Percent Black

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander

3.3

1.8

3b

1

199g

1:11Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish edge

21.4

2.4

1

24

1

1980

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 11.4 38 1940


Percent of Children


46.2 0 - 1.0

25.0 11 2U

9.b 21 - 30

11.5 31 40

7.7 > 40

Percent pour children to State in LEA with largest enrollment 25.5 Anchurage

Percent poor children to State in S largest LEAs 49.b Ancuotage, North Star Borough (Fairbanks), Kenai

Peninsula Borough, Natanussa-gesitna iiurougn,

Juneau no rough

Alaska (continued)

Other State Programs


No program


No program established at the State level


Some schools in Alaska have adopted a State-sponsored Effective Schooling Program which contains a

school site planning component. In addition, all districts must develop a curriculum with clear goals

and effective evaluation and conduct a curriculum review every six years.

Teacher reforms

No career ladder or merit pay programs have been reported in Alaska. The State does not require testing

for initial certification, but the SEA is in the midst of reviewing the certification process.

fi7(IQ

ARIZONA

1979-6U Most Recent fear

Amount Rank Mount Rams Year

Percent

Change

title 1/Chapter 1 it/Luc:lc:nu Uat.1

$34.941,03

1;27.711,0/1

$516,373

32,43b

85, 92.1

26

29

28

30

29

S40,614,1190

$32,486dob

$17,01,J9J

522,428,DO8

$460,751

S10331

90,056

21,

29

J1

49

26

JU

2b

1964-65

19d4-d5

1962-63

1964-6)

1984-85

19114-65

1964-s]

16.2

16.9

-Judi

49.1-20.3

-24.13

4.6

Total allocation

total LEA grants

Total LEA grants in adjusred 1979-30 Aullars

State administration set Aside


LEA child count for furmula purposes

Title I/Chavter 1 Partici atiou Data

67,19/ 2b 41,u07 28 1982-6.1 -49.fetal number of participants

Number of participants K-b 0,047 Li 19,655 29 1962-63 -35. 0

Number of participants 1 -12 2L,U90 1I,2b8 21 1982-ai -4b. 0

Number of acupublic participants 1,5:16 22 L9d1 -dJ


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 3.3 25 1960-d1

Number of public participants 05,661 25 411, no IN 1962-d3 -J8.5


Title i/Chapter 1 12.9 14 7.9 31 1982-63

Percent of students receiving reading $9.S 7 d5.2 LO 1962-83

Percent of students receiving math 15.1 41 H.3 50 1982-d;

Percent of students receiving language arts 4./ Z4 8.2 21 1962-83


English-proficient 13.0 12.0 5 1962-63


services 0 NA NA 1982-n3


guidance services 26.4 0.1 39 1962-63

Iitle I/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Tale I/Chapter 1 FfE staff members 2,653 id 1,490 28 1962-8.1 -43.8

Number of FIE teachers 153 30 566 31 1962-d3 -21.9

Number of Fit aides 1,632 19 755 24 1962-0 -53.2

Number of FfE administrative staff 73 24 53 Z4 1962-di -27.4

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 25,3 34 27.5 29 1962-63 O./

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $412 46 6577 32 1962-0 40.0

Instructional settings: Pull:nits predominate In

LEAs although SEA data not encourage or discourage

then 1964-6

Schoolwide projects: Yes 1964-d5

al

Arizona (continued)

19/9-dU lost Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAnnunt Rank An( Rank YtNIT


Number of operating LEAs 212 2) 108 25 1981-8J -1.9

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,884 JO £2,4)2 3? 1982-di 29.9

Overall average per pupil expenditure in ,adjusted

1979-80 dollars $1,814 37 1902-8J -3.9

Enrollment in public elementary and secondary

schools 509,252 19 510,29b 17 19dt-8J U.2

Enrollment in nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools 40,2b1 18 1980-01

&kat of total enrollment in nonpublic sc000ts 7.J 34 1980-8i


and secondary schools 29,315 28 148O-81

Pent of nonpublic enrollment in religiously


rotal enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 554,V51 29 1980-131

Per capita income $8.011 34 $11,629 33 1964 45.2

AfS tax capacity index 91 37.51 96 27.5r 1982



P.L. 94-142 47,202 2$ 50,66J 28 1962-83 7.1


P.L. 89-313 1,101 J4 1,199 39 1982-83 8.9


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-J13 combined 9.2 26 1980-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-Englisn-

proficient J.0 3 1980



Percent Black 3.4 35 1960

Percent Asian and Pacific islander 0.9 18 1980

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 8..J 4 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 12.2 4 /900

Percent of children aged 5-17 lo poverty 15.017 1960


Percent of Children

Percent of 'Amulets In Poverty

25.7

36.9

18.2

9.4

9.6

0 10

11 - 20

21 - JO

31 - 40

40

Percent poor children in Stare in HA with largest enrollment 13.7 Phoenix Union Ulan

Percent pour children in State iu 5 largest LEAs 28.1 Phoenix Union nigh, Tucson Unified. Glendale Union

alAh, Washington uementary, Mesa Unitiod

kik

Arizona (continued)

Other State Flom?


No program


Standards set at both the State and locai levels

Grades assessed: 8, 12

Expected uses: grade promotion, high school graduation



Arizona has neither State-sponsored effective schools projects nor a district or school planning

requirement.

Teacher reforms

The legislature passed a pilot career ladder program in 1984. The State requires prospective teachers

to pass proficiency exams to enter education schools and to qualify for certification.

63

.NO

AKKANSaS

1979-40 Most ascent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount 'tank Amount sank Year

Title 1/Chapter 1 Allocation nata

Total allocation $4d,u115,745 IS $42,007,293 27 1984-65 -11.3

rotas LEA grants B40,951,146 23 105,959,150 lb 1484-da -12.2

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $17,i44,243 21 1982-ti3 -32.J

$24,901,454 lb 1964-65 -39.2

State administration set aside $709,902 13 5399,431 15 1984-d3 -43.7

State administration set aside per operating LLA $1,903 37 $1,077 40 1484-45 -43.4

LEA child count for formula purposes 15b,374 10 110,769 22 19134-4) -19.4

Title I/Chapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 84,511 21 61.141 11 1962-63 -20.o

Number of participants K -6 59,508 24 52,056 it 1982-63 -11.b

Number of participants 7-12 24,621 14 14,484 17 1182-d3 -41.6

Number of nonpublic participants 970 3U 342 3s 1482-83 -44.1


in Title I/Ckapter 1 loot available/ 0.3 8 1980-d1

Number of public participants 83,b01 21 b6,b05 20 1482-0 -/O.J

Perceot of all public school students served in

Title t/Chapter 1 16.5 4 15.4 5 1982-83

Percent of students receivleg reading 513.4 48 75.7 lb 1482-43

Percent of students receiving math 20.1 44 36.4 21 1984-63

Percent of students receiving language arts 4.3 27 8.8 19 19d2 -di

Percent of students receiving English for limited -

English- proficient 0 NA NA 1981-0Percent of students receiving health and nutrition

services 1.2 31 NA 1962-d3 .Percent of students receiving attendance and

guidance services 43.4 2 28.8 8 1962-d3

Title 1/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 fa staff members 3,941 22 2,830 22 83 -28.2

Number of FTE teachers 1,341 24 1,051 14 . --d3

Number of FTE aides 2,216 15 1,577 12 1e2-83 -18.8

Number of FTE administrative staff 71 2) 65 23 1982-d1 -8.5

Title 1/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 21.5 14 23.7 18 1982-83 10.2

Title 11Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 1484 39 8559 35 19U-d3 15.5

Instructional settings: Pullouts predominate in

LEAs although SEA does nut encourage or discouray

them 1964-65

khoolwide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-65

7:;b4

Arkansas (continued)

1979-80 Host decent 'ear

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Kan( Yedr


Number of operating LEAs 373 lb 371 lb 1982-83 -U.5

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,4 2 51 $1,d55 A 1982-e3 SO.5

Overall average per pupil expenditure In adjeuted

1979-80 dollars $1,371 50 1981-83 -3.5

Enrollment In public elementary and secondary

schools 453,125 31 432,50 31 1982-83 -4.5


schools 18,423 38 1980-d1

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 4.0 4b i980-8L


and secondary schools 13,228 39 19d0-81



Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 106,123 32 1980 -81

Per capita income 36,639 50 $9,724 49 1984 0.5RfS tar capacity index 77 48 19 41 1982


Number or handicapped children served under

P.L. 94-142 40,138 31 45,424 all 1982-83 13.2


P.L. 89-313 4,889 13 3,580 1b 1982-81 -26.8



Percent of children aged 5-11 limited-Englisn-




Percent Black 21.2 10 19d0

Percent Asian and Pacific islander 0.3 45 1980

Percent Amerieam Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.0 22 1980


Percent of children aged 5-0 la poverty 21.7 5 1960

Distribution of children in poverty across LtAs

Percent of Districts

Percent of Children

In Poverty

6.7 0 - 10

34.2 II 20

31.8 21 30

13.8 31 - 40

13.5 1"-. 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment

Percent pour children in State in 5 largest Las

'7b)

3.1 Pulaski County Special (Little Kock)

15.4 POlOblti County Special (Little Kock), Little Kock,

Fort Smith, North Little Kock, Pine Bluff

Arkansas (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: 3, 4, b, 6

Expected uses: remediation

First graduating class assessed: not available


The key elements of the Arkansas school improvement program are content mastery, instructional skills,

classroom management skills, planning, use of resources, and human relations. The State has established

a voluntary Program for Effective Teaching, in which nearly three-fourths of the teachers and principals

were participating by 1983, Arkansas has promotIonal-gates tests In reading, math, social studies, and

language arts in grades 3, 6, and 8. If more than 15 percent of the students within a district fail

these tests, the district must submit an improvement plan to the State. If the passage rate shows no

improvement after two years, the district is subject to dissolution.

Teacher reforms

All teachers were required to take basic skills tests in reading, math, and writing during the 1964-85

school year. They must pass the tests by June 1, 1987. Remedial courses are required before the test

can be retaken. Teachers must also demonstrate academic skills in their subject area. A career ladder

or merit pay program is under consideration

66

7:;

CAL1FOKNIA

1919-80 Most Recent Year

Percent

thaw:Amount Bank Amount Hank Year

Title 1/Chapter I. Allocation Data

Total allocation $299,993,371 2 $3°1,453,783 1 1984-85 1U,5

Total LEA grants $244,3;.4,989 2 Sz19,d0,'144 2 104-85 14.5

Mal LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $10,890,883 2 102-83 -31.4

5193,2114,30 2 1984-85 -20.7

State administration set aside B4,c33,399 2 53,388,514 1 1984-0 -23.6

State administration set aside per operating LEA $4,292 23 $3,280 21 1904-85 -23.b

LEA child count fat formula purposes 091,4n1 1 719,349 1 1984-85 1.6

Title I/Chapter 1 Participation Data*

Total number of participants 825,946 1 847,500 L 1982-83 2.b

Number of participants K-6 585,021 1 613,258 1 1982-83 4.3

Number of participants 7-12 203,602 1 228,925 1 1982-83 12.4

Umbel of nonpublic participants 14,219 3 20,398 3 1982-63 4J.J


in Title I/Chapter I (not available) 2.2 Di 1980-81 --

Number of public participants 778,1U8 1 827,162 i 1982-83 6.3


Title I/Chapter 1

Percent of students receiving reading

19.2

96.4

3

I

20.4

86.4

2

7 119:2214 49


Permut of students receiving language Arts 94.8 1 77.3 1 1982-83


Engiish-proficlent


to 1 .27.5 1 02-619 .1

services 87.9 I 36.2 3 1981-83

Percent of student- receiving attendance and

guidance services 0 NA 34.4 3 1902-83

Title I/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title Ighaprer 1 FTE staff members 16,198 1 15,137 2 1982-83 -6,6

Number of FIE teachers 2,418 12 3,391 3 1982-83 40.2

Number of FTE aides 11,254 1 9,374 1 1982-03 -19.4

Number of FTE administrative staff 154 9 124 6 1982-84 -19.5

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 51.0 51* 56.0 5L 1982-83 9.6

Title L/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditures

instructional settings: It is not known if

pullouts predominate; SEA does not encourage or

discourage them

5Z96 51* $207 51 1982-83

1.984-8,

-9.8

Schoolwide projects: Yes

* California does not separate Chapter 1 and SCE child

participants represent estimates.

Couftt

7'

data. Numbers of Chapter 1

1984 -85

California (contlnud)

19M-HO Most Recent Year

Percent

Amount Rdftlf Amount Ram Year Cuan4e

State characteristics

Number of operating Ws


Overall average per pupil expenditure in adjulaed

1979 -HO dollars


schools

Enrollment in nonpublic elementary and

secondary schools

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools

Enrollment in reilgiousIf affiliated elementary

and secondary schools

Percent of nonpusl., enrollment in religiously

affiliated schools

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary

schools

Per capita income

RTS tax capacity index


1,01

$2,184

4,047,5A

S9,951

1.16

J51,111

4,422

i

:2

1

4

5

1

15

1,03.1

$2 00

$1,967

4,M5,4eb

511,70

Ltd

410,575

79.9

4031,731

$14 , J141:

361,047

J,271

7.8

1.9

71.9

45.3

5.9

1.2

25.5

14.2

i

JO

JO

1

2

18

1

30

1

6

9

1

18

41

6

41

111

2

It

3

22

1982-8J

1981-8J

1982-8J

1942-r3

198U.81

i98U-81

1980-81

1980-81

1988-81

1984

1982

1982-83

1982-83

1980-81

1.980

198U

U

1980

198C

198U

198U

U

22.9

-/.1

U.4

4i.1

2.8

-20.0

Number of handicapped '%ildren served under

P.L. 94-142


P.L. 89-313

Percept of total school enrollment served by

P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined


proficient


Percent White

Percent Black


Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty


Percent of Children


38.9

41.7

14.9

3.1

1.4

0 10

11 20

11 30

31 40

> 40

Percent poor children In State in LEA with largest enrollment 18.8 Los Angeles Unified

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 24.9 Los Augeles Unified, San Diego 1:ity Unified,

Sae Francisco Unified, East Side Onion 1110

{San Jose), Grossmout Union digit (La Now

7"od

California (continued)

Other State Ftograms

State compensatory education program*

Allocations

1979-80 $159.0 million

1984-95 $187.5 million

1984-85 allocation in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $129.8 million

SCE fund,: ,..: a proportion of federal funds

1979 - 80

1983 84

5J.0%

51.9

Funding approach: formula compares proportion of low income families to State tItals

Targeting approach: low income students scoring below second quartile on State assessment; priority to

early grades

Number of students served: not applicable; students served by SCE are not counted separately from

Chapter 1.

Minimum umpeency testing

Standards set at both the State and local levels

Grades assessed: 4-11; lb year olds+

Expected uses: grade promotion, high school graduation, early exit, remediatioa


* State compensatory education allocations include bilingual education funds that cannot be separated in

State records.

09

8u

California (continued)


About half of California's public schools participate in a State-funded planning program. Using a

general framework established by the State, local schools develop a three-year master plan which

describes improvement objectives and methods of achieving them., The Chief State School Officer has

developed an accountability program which reviews districts on a school-by-school basis and indicates

five year goals for enrollment, test scores, performance of college-bound students, dropout and

attendance rate, extracurricular activities, and homework and writing assignments. tinder the Education

Improvement Incentive Program, high schools can earn bonuses of up to $400 per student depending on the

performance of seniors on the California Assessment Program. The State does not sponsor any effective

schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The State has established a voluntary mentor plan which provides an annual stipend of up to $4,000 for

selected senior teachers to lead inservice programs and develop curricula. The legislature has approved

$17.1 million for an instruction improvement program in which teachers can receive up to $2,000 in

grants. A basic skills test must be passed before a teacher is certified. Districts with teacher

shortages may hire noncertiffed individuals who 'lave Bachelor of Arrs degrees in the subjects they will

teach, pass basic skills and subject area tests, and agree to work with a mentor teacher.

70.

8f

COLORADO

197 -80 lost Recent Year

Percent

LhangeAmount Rank Anount !tank Year

fitle I/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Trani allocation 430,443,09 31 434,079,046 31 1944-85 11.9

Total LEA grants S24,959,043 32 428,4)7.434 JO 1144-85 14.0

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-R0 dollars $111,392,729 29 1962-81 -2b.3

319,707,364 JO 1964-85 -21.0

State administration set aside 6449,S91 31 $319,461 31 104-65 -29.0

state administration set aside per operating LEA $2,484, 29 $1,765 31 1984-85 -29.0


rule I/Chaoter 1 Paula ation Data

75,516

39,984

32

.14

64,,060

33,727

31

32

1984-0

1982-8J

-12.)

-15.4,'total number of participants

Number of participants K-b 25,390 34 22,155 33 1982-83 -10.4

Number of participants 7 -l2 1.1,152 2b 9,612 26 1981-83 -25.4

Number uf nonpublic participants 1,032 28 199 26 1982-0 -21.b

Percent if all nonpublic school students served

in Title I/Chapter i (not available, 3.0 27 1960-61

Number of public participants J6.952 3J 32,928 32 1962-113 -15.)


Title 1/Chapter 1 7.1 45 6.0 44, 1984-83

Percent of students receiving reading 61.0 24 79.1 24 19132-di

Percent of students receiving math 30.1 35 2b.5 39 1962-83

Percent of students receiving language arts 11.6 lb 0.4 5 1962-d3

Percent of students receiving English for limited

English- proficient 0 NA NA 1982-83


services 0 NA 0.2 2b 1962-63 ..-


guidance services

title I/Chanter 1 Program Charazteristies

0 NA 2.4 31 1982-63 ....

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 1,719 32 1,298 32 1982-83 -27.4

Number of FIE teachers bbl 24, 724 27 1982-43 -0.9Number of FTE aides 680 33 353 37 1982-83 -48.1

Number of FTE administrative staff 41 31 29 31 1982-6J -29.3

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 23.3 24, 27.0 27 1962-63 15.9

Title I/Chapter 1 averav per pupil expenditure Eti24 15 5137 13 1982-83 16.1


Ilks although SLA does nut encourage or discourage

them i984-85

SehoolwIde projocts: Hone reported by SEA 1964-d5

11

Colorado (continued)

1979-60 (lost Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Rank Year


Number of operating LEAs 181. 14..)f 181 18 1961-di U

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,35.1 1; $3,118 id 1944-d3 J1.5

Overall average per pupil expenditure In adiusted

1979-80 dollars $2,30h 16 1982-83 -2.0


schools 550,527 27 545,209 2b 1982-133 -1.0


schools d3,250 198U-L

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 6,1 39 198U-di


and secondary schools 27,993 29 198U -dl

Percent of nonpublic enrollment in rellglow,lv

affiliated schools 79.4 31 198U-81

total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 581,28.1 16 196U-o1

Per capita income 19,00 15 $13,?42 9 1984 51.3

XfS tax capacity index 11U 91' 111 a 19b1



P.G. 94-142 4i,b.15 29 41,287 31 1981-83 -5.4


P.L. 89-313 3,593 Id 3.839 15 1982-83 b.8


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 umbined d.4 37 198U-01

Percent of children aged 5-17 linited-Logiish-

proficient I.0 14 198U



Percent Black 4,3 31 1900

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 1.2 13 1980

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.9 18 19110

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin lb.1 5 1980

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 10.8 411' 1980

Distribution of children in poverty across (Ms


Percent of Children

in Poverty

34.8 U -1035.4 iU

15.5 11 - 30

9.9 31 - 40

4.4 41)

Permit poor children In titate in LEA with largest enrollment

Percent pour children In State in 5 idrus;. U.As

12

5.t, Jefferson County ft.akewood,

40.5 Jefferson County lLohewoodl, Denver,

Colorado ::nrings, Adams-Arapnahoe (Aurora).

Boulder Valley (boulder)

Colorado (continued)



No program


Standards set at the local level


Expected uses: high school graduation (at local option)



All districts are required t^ have a continuing five year school improvement plan based on local

priorities. Each individual .,chool is encouraged to develop a multi-year school improvement plan.

There are no State-sponsored effective school projects. The Governor has proposed a limited voucher

system for students who have failed in the traditional classroom setting; this idea is opposed by the

Colorado Education Association.

Teacher reforms

More than one salary schedule for teachers is now permitted. This will allow districts to establish

career ladders. Colorado requires testing for initial certification d teacher.

7:3

CONNKCI1C0f

D79-811 Host Recent Year

Percent


title 1/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

total allocation 110,882,304 3U $38,719,844 29 1984-85 15.4

Total. LEA grants F2u.bb,20.1 30 V12,400,447 28 1944-0 24.1

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1':179-8U dollars i17,J44,171 32 1982-83 -33.6

$22,419,34 28 1984-85 -14.1

State administration set aside 05U,J08 JO S3n2,987 29 1984-85 -20.

State administration set aside per operating LL4 12,706 28 $2,200 17 1984-8, -LU.5

LEA child count for formula purposes 71,120 JJ 69,052 30 1944-0 -3.7


Total number of participants 0003 29 32,720 33 1982-83 -45.9

Number of participants 4-b

.Number of Fr ticipants 7-12

42,57l

12,842

18

27

22,480

8,7Ul

34

21

1982-8J

19t11-83

-47.2

-R./Number of nonpublic participants 4,873 il 1,968 18 1981-83 -)9.b


in Title liChapter i toot available/ 4.b 16 1980-81

Number of public participants 55,00 21 .10,7)2 14 1982-8J

Percent of all public school stu.lras served in

Title 1/Chapter 1 9.8 a o.3 43 1982-63


Percent of students receiving math

Percent of students receiving language arts

52.0

33.3

1.3

49

27

37

78.4

bU.I

0.2

29

J

41

198 2-3

i982-4 .1

1904-6.1

Percent of students receiving English for Limited-

English-proficient


13.3 2 15.0 3 1982-83

services 0 NA -- NA 1981 -83

Percent of students :, 'wing attendance and

guidance services 0.8 4U 3.0 27 1982-d3

Title 1/Chapter 1 Prograz Characteristics

Number of Title 1 /Chapter 1 FIE start members 2,683 27 1,803 27 1982-03

Number of FIB teachers 1,174 2) 1170 2b 1982-83 -J5.9

Number of FTE aides 1,146 25 7313 26 1902-83 -35.b

Number of FFE administrative staff V NA 65 22 19d1 -d3 --

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 22.a 21 18.2 3 1982-83

Title 1 /Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 6432 43 $717 17 1982-83 b6.0

Instructional settings; Pullouts predominate in


them 1984-85

Schooluble projects; Yes 1964-85

4:lJ 76

Cunnecticut (continued)

1919-80 Most Recant Yoar

Amount Rank Amount 1140K fear

Percent

Change

'Ate Characteristics

Number of operating Ws 110 30 165 JO 1982-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure 12,341 18 $3,50 o 1481-83 12.3

Overall average per pupil expenditure in adjusted

1919-80 dollars S2,037 b 1982-83 12.0

Lnroliment in public elementary and secondary

schools 5bo.t34 2b 48o,470 /9 1982-83 -14.1


schools 88,404 1/ 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 14.J 11 1980-81

Lurolimenr in religiously affillJted elementary

and secondary lichunis 61,399 11 1980-81


affiliated schools lo.2 34 1980-8t

Total enrollment In elementary rind secondary schools o11.861 15 080-81

Per capita income $10.29h 3 $10,369 3 1984 59.0

RfS tax capacity index 1U9 121 ill 7.)1' 1982



P.L. 94-142 59.506 24 02,928 25 1982-83 5.0


P.L. 89-313 3.045 2/ 3.082 22 1982-83 1.2


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 10.6 6 1980-8/

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-Engli4n-





Percent Asian and Pacific islander U.7 22 1900

Percent Aeerican iodian/Cskimo/Aleot U.2 41 MOPercent of school 'nrollment of Spanish origin 5.9 13 1980

Percent of children aged 5 -11 in poverty 1U.4 44 1980

Distribution of children in poverty across LEAS


Percent of Children

in Poverty

84.2 0 - 10

12.7 LL 1U

1.2 21 3U

1.8 11 40

0 > 40

Percent poor children in State in LLA uirh largesi onrallment 13.9 Bridgeport

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LLAs 5U.9 Bridgeport. rtirttord, New Haven. Waterbury,

Stamturd

1)

Connecticut (continued)



Allocations

1979-80 $1.0 million

1984-85 $6.4 lillion


SCE funds as a proportion of Federal funds

1979-80 22.7%

1984-85 16.5%

Funding approach: formula averages the comparisons of (1) proportion of low income and AFDC families to

State totals, and (2) proportion of students falling below State level of expected performance on 9th

grade proficiency test (SLOPE),

Targeting approach: students scoring below 23rd percentile on a standardized test.

Number of students served

1979-80

1983-84


14,000 (estimate)

9,000 (estimate)

Standards set a he State level

Grades assessed: 4, 6, 8



76 7 .1

Connecticut (continued)


The Connecticut School Effectiveness Project is a voluntary schoolbased program which concentrates on

seven school characteristics: safe and orderly environmen" clear school mission and goals,

instructional leadership, high staff expectations, opportunity to learn and time on task, frequent

monitoring of student progress, and home/school relations. The major objective of the project is to

improve student achievement in low achieving schools in reading, writing and math. Part of the project

involves a school assessment and the devegopment of an action plan which is done with the help of a

facilitalor from either the SEA or regiolal education service center. in spring IN, the legislature

established a program to give grants for technical services to 10 districts with greatest need.

Teacher reforms

A career fader or merit pay program is under consideration. Testing for initial teacher certification

is required. Connecticut has established Staterun professional development instruction for teachers

and will require LEAs to submit professional development plans to the SEA ' ) April 1986.

17

DEIAWArtE

1179-80 Rost Accent Year

Amount 'tank Amount Hank Year

Percent

Lnange

Title 1.4.1apter 1 Allocatiun Data

Total allocation 510,13t,916 42 111,985,109 41 1184-85 ILITotal LEA grants 57,179,875 45 58,458,175 45 1984-85 17.8

Total LEA grants In adjusted 1979-80 4,AL)rn 54,935,175 4o 1982-83 -31.3

55,857,5.11 43 1984-65 -18.4

State administration set amide 5215,000 44.5T $215,U00 43.51 1964-85 U

State administration set aside per operating, IL 514,063 b 511,842 7 1984-85 -15.8

LEA child count for formula purpose4 16,48J 4o 18,500 45 1984-65 U.1


Total number of participants 12,167 4S 6,664 4o 1981-83 -28.8

Number of participants K-b 11,071 4i 7,913 44 102-$3 -18.5

Number of participants 7-12 1,065 49 708 49 1981-43 -33.5

Number of nonpublic participants 1,002 21 508 37 1982-83 -31.1


In Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 3.9 20 1980-61


Percent of all public school students served lo

Title I /Chapter 1

11,105

1U.1

45

2:1

8,156

8.a

46

24

1962-63

1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 89.8 ) 82.6 15 1182-83 mIl

Percent of students receiving math j4.,, 23 ..13.6 28 1982-83 .06

Percent of students receiving language Arts 7,-1 11 1.7 33 19U-8JPercent of students receiving English for liaited-

English-ptalcient 1.4 15 1.1 14 1982-83Percent of students receiving health and nutrition

services 7.4 19 NA 1982-83


guidance services 13.0 20 0.7 3f 1982-83

Title 1/Chapter 1 Program Char-cterlstics

Number of rifle I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 494 48 3b9 46 1982-83 -15.3

Number of FTE teachers 129 46 luS 47 1962-us -10.2

Number of FFE aides 323 41 222 42 1982-83 -31.3

Number of FTE administrative staff 12 41 IL 4U 198L-83 U

Title 1/Chapter I pupil/staff ratio 24.b 31 23.5 15 198Z-83 -4.5

Title I/Chaprer I average per pupil expenditure

instructional settings: It is not known if pullouts

predominate: SEA does not encourage or discourage

them

them

SAO 19 5710 10 1V81-63

1984-85

40.5

Schoolvide projects: Hoe reported by SEA 1384-85

Delaware lcontlnued/

1979-8U nest decent tear

Amount Kat* Amount Rank Year

Percent

Change

State Otaracteristics

dumber of operating LEAs lb 49 14 -o8 1982-13.1 18.8

Overall average per pupil expenditure 1;2,122 6 $J, J54 it) 1982-d! 14.1

Overall average per pupil expenditure io adpsted

L979 -80 dollars $2,441. 1U 1902-04 -8.9


schools 104,035 48 92.o48 48 1992-83 -10.9

Enrollment in nonpublic elementary awl secondary

schools 24,474 15 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment In nonpublic schools 19.1) 1


and secondary schools 19.U22 45 198U -dl

Percent of nonpublic enrollment In religiously


fatal enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 122,117 41 1980-81

Per capita income 59,U15 lb 314,54a 11 1984 50.2

Rrs tax capacity index 110 91 115 IA.-A* 11112



P.L. 94-142 1.1,910 41 11,245 4o 1981-83 -5.0

Umber of handicapped children served under

P.L. 89-313 2,524 Lb 3,161.1 19 1982-83 25.2



Percent of children aged 5-17 limit 1-tnglish-

proficient U. 24 1980



Percent Black 11.0 11 198U

Percent Asian and Pacific islander 0.9 lb 1980



Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 14.o ZO 198U


Percent of Children

Percent sit Districts In Poverty

6.3 0 - 10

94.8 11 20

U 71- 30U 31 - 40

4U

Percent poor chtidren In State in LEA with largest enrollment

l.ernenL poor children In Stale in 5 largest LIAs

79

18.2 Red Clay CnasDlidatod (Wilmington}

ni.9 Red Clay Consolinateo Ntleington). Christ[al(8ewarld, Brandywine. Colonial New Castle),

CJesar dodney

Delaware (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: 1-8, 11

Expected uses: high school graduation



Delaware has two large school improvement programs: (1) the Educational Accountability System, whica

involves student achievement, needs assessment and program Improvement and (2) the Goal-Directed and

Performance-Based Instruction plan. Both programs require all districts to submit plans. The State

also sponsors effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder with incentives for the best teachers is under consideration. Prospective educators

must pass a basic-skills test.

80

FLORIDA

1979-80 Most ACCV4i. fear

Amount Rasit Amount Kann, Year

Percent

Change


Total allocation

total LEA grants

51120184,114

588,726,740

I

7

S151,05,173

SL23,801,121

6

0

1944-8:,

1904-d5

34,6

.19.5

'.'otai LEA gtants in adjusted 19!9-80 dollars S63,260,0z8 1 1962-84 -18.1

S8),734,0)1 b 1904-65 -3.4

state administration set aside $1,0i65,28L 1 $1,421035 6 1984-d5 -14.b

State administration set aside per operating LEA $24,855 4 $21,217 4 1984-65 -14.6

{.Eh child count fot farmula purposes J07,318 9 332,304 19134-0 8.2

Title 1/Chanter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 157,923 9 14 39.291 b 1982-63

Number of participants K-b 139,990 5 .A,013 5 1982-di -14.J

Number of participants 7-12 14,787 24 22,418 11 1982-di al.b

Number of nonpublic participants 4,390 li 3,)7.1 14 1902-0J -18.t


in Title 1/Chapter 1 rout a WAIF.) 2.9 J. 11U0-81

Number of public participants 1).1033 9 1399710 b 19d2-4.1 -9.0


Title 1/Chapter 1 .0.1 25 9.4 21 1982-03

Percent of vudents receiving reading uS.0 17 &J./ 23 19132 -83

Perceor of students receiving math 31.9 34 35.7 2J 1962-84

Percent of students receiving language arts 1.9 3d 2.5 J5 1102 -63

Percent of students receiving Englisn for limited-

Wash-proficient 0 l;", 0.2 25 1902-83


services 1.9 :7 0.3 23 1982-83


guidance services 10.8 2t 4.0 23 1982-83


Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FtE staff members t,813.1 4,794 7 1982-83 -29.5

Number of YTE teachers 1,419 1.1 1982-83 -26.5

Number of FTE aides 3,304 2,468 5 1982-43 -25.3

Number of en. administrative staff 77 22 67 21 1962-8J -13.0


Title L/Chaptet 1 average per pupil expenditure t5b2 22 $547 28 1982-d3 6.2


LEAs but the SEA discourage

thems them 1964-85

Schoolwide projects: Yes 1984-65

di

Florida (continued)


Amount 144ak Amount Roux Year r

Percent

Lhatige


Number of operating LEAs 67 eU 07 40 1981 -8J U

Overall average per pupil expenditure 31,794 39 $2,o19 J5 19b2-di 43.8


1919 -80 dollars 51,908 Jo 1942-84 0.4


schools 1,508,437 d 1,484,734 8 1982-64 -1.6

Entollment in nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools 204,988 8 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 12.0 lb 19140-61


and secondary schools lO4,904 9 1980-81


affiliated schools 75.6 35 1980-bt

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 1,715,213 8 1980-8L

Per capita income 58,257 28 $12,554 12 1984 52.0

R15 tat capacity index tUU lbf 104 18 1962



P.L. 94-142

lumber of handicapped children served under

129,552 9 147,50 d 1982-83 13.9

P.L. 89-313 7,411 9 8,042 U 1982-83 8.


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 8.4 3b 198U-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 iimitcd-inglish-

proficient 1.] 11 19d0


Percent White 76,8 35 198U

Percent Hack 20.7 12 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific Inlander 0.8 21 198U

Percent American Indian/EsklmoiAleur U.4 34 1960

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 9.b 8 1980


Distribution of children in poverty across LE.Ns

Percent of Children

Percent of Districts In Poverty

O 0 1U

41.8 11 20

[mom,

Percent poor:hen in State in with larqe0. earoilment

Percent pour children in State in 5 largest LEAs

11,9

1.5

21 - 30

31 40

40

132

43. Oade Cuuaty droward Count/

17.6 Dade County (Miami)

(sort Lauderdale), Hillsboruugh County (lamp),

Duval County ilacksunvillei, Pinellas County

(Clearwater)

--1

Flor'da (continued)

Other State Provos.


Allocations

1979-80 $28.5 million

1984-85 $34.4 million

1984-85 allocation in adjusted 1919 -8U dollars $23.8 million

SCE funds as a proportion of Federal funds

1979-80 25.3%

1984-85 22.1%

Funding approach: LEAs are entitled to funds on the basis of the number of students scoring at or below

the 25th percentile on the State Student Assessment Tests.

Targeting approach: State Student Assessment Test scores are used to identify participants and those

"at risk".


1979-80

i983-84


Not available

2b1,458


Grade assessed: 3, 5, 8, 11

Expected uses: grade promotion, high school graduation, early exit


Florida (continued)


In Florida, State funds are available for school-based management projects, which include planning at

both the school and district levels. A program for grades I(-3 provides staff development, the reduction

of class size, and prescriptive teaching. All participants are assessed for potential learning problems

and instructional strategies are developed to address these problems. The State does not sponsor any

effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The Florida legislature has established a two-phase merit pay plan which (i) authorizes districts and

unions to negotiate plans for personnel in meritorious schools selected on indicators such as

attendance, test scores, and participation in extracurricular activities and (2) establishes a statewide

plan for individual teachers who must pass a test in their subject area and a performance evaluation.

State officials expect continued conflict with unions regarding merit pay plans. For initial

ratification, a written competency exam and a performance evaluation are required.

1'

84

1979-80 Most Recent fear

Percent

Amount Rank Amount Rant fear Change


Total allocation 381,454.618 11 J15.869,403 11 1984-85 2.9

TOW LEA grants 618,078,795 11 679,728,053 11 1984-03 LITotal LEA grants In adjusted 1979-80 dollars S53,723,245 12 1982-83 -31.2

05,213.333 11 1984-0 -29.3

State Administration set aside tI,233,,ri2 1.1 3t1U5,801 IL 1984-85 -34.7

etate administration set aside per op(?rating LEA ' $6.5.4b 15 $4,385 lb 1984-85 -34.1

LEA c.:ild count for formula purposes 4:97,540 ln 250:73) 9 1944-d) -15.1

Title It.kapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 159.b40 6 113.94b 13 1'052-83 -28.6

Number of participants K-13 113.894 12 85,700 14 b81 -03 -24.7

Number of participants 1 -12 45,372 8 28,18) 8 1982-83 -37.9

Number of nonpublic participants 1,116 2b 213 42 1962-03 -75.5


In Title I/Chapter 1 (nor available) 2-1 40 1980-di

Number of public participants 158,530 b 113.013 12 1982-di -28.4

2ercent of all Public school students served in

Title I/Chapter 1 14.7 10 10.8 12 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 8U.0 20 14.1 27 1881 -83

Percent of students receiving math $5.b 7 58.0 b 1982-83

Percent of students receiving language arts U NA 2.7 32 1981-83


English-proficient 2.5 11 0 HP 1982-83


services 2.1 2b U HA 1982-83


guidance services 0 NA U HA 1982-03

WM


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 6,138 8 9,36b 3 1982-81 52.6

Number of FTE teachers 3,193 5 2,3135 10 1982 -83 -25.3

Number of FTE aides 2,608 13 3,231 4 1982-133 24.1


Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 26.0 37 12.2 1 1982-83 -53.1

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 5489 37 t0J7 25 1982-83 30.3

Instructional settings: The extent of pullout is

unknown 1984-85

Schoolvide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-85

115

Georgia (continued)


Amount Rank Amount dank fear

Pcrcent

Change


Number of operating [Ms 187 26.5r 187 26.5I 1982-0 U

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1.490 48 SZ.000 44 II82-83 Jii.

Overall average per pupil expenditure in adjucted

L979-80 dollars 31,479 44 1982-8J -0.7


schools 1,078.462 12 1,053,019 IL 1982-83 -1.3


schools 82,505 18 1940-81

Percent of total enrollment In nonpublic schools 7.2 35 11SU-81


and secondary schools 38,051 is 198U-81


affiliated schools 46.1 5U 1900-81

Total enrollment in elamentary and secondary schoolc 1451.242 LI 1980-S1

Per capita income $1,377 38 $11,441 35 1944 5.).1

RES tam capacity index 81 45.5r 84 42,51 1962



P.L. 94-142 99,229 12 109,b74 12 1982-53 10.3


P.L. 89-313 2,618 15 2,881 25 1982-51 1U.0


P.L. 94-142 and A.G. 89-313 combined 9,1 20 1980-81


proficient 0.2 41 198U





Percent American Indien/EsSimoiAleut 0.2 44 196U

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin la 35 1980

Percent of J:hildren aged 5-17 In poverty LD.5 9 1980



Percent of ChLldren

In Poverty

8.4 0 ID

25.1 11 - 20

36.9 2L - 30

]L 40

6.4 > 40

Percent poor children In State in LEA with largest enrollment 3,Z 0.0Kalb County (Decatur)

Percent poor children in State in 5 Largest LEAs 24.; DRKalb County (Decatur), Altanta Qty. Cobb County

(HariettaJ, Chatham County tSavannah),

Fulton County, (Altanta)

80

Georgia (continued)



Allocations

1979-89 $12.1 million

1984-85 $18.1 million


SCE funds as a proportion of federal funds

1979-80 15.2%

1984-85 21.1%

Funding approach: formula based oa the number of 4th and 8th grade students failing to achieve a

certain score on the reading and/or math portions of the State Criterion Referenced Test plus the number

of students failing to achieve a certain score on the lOth grade Basic Skills Test (exit exam).

Targeting approach: for grades 1-8, as LEA needs assessment is used to identify students who need

special help to achieve at age level; for grades 9-12, participants are those falling the Basic Skills

Test (exit exam),


1979-80

1983-84


158,000

Reading: 53,107

Math: 43,667 (duplicated counts)


Grades assessed: 1-4, 6, 8, 104.



Si

Georgia (continued)


Systematic planning at the local level is the thrust of the Georgia Educational Improvement Program.

The program is a local responsibility, but technical assistance is available from the SEA. There are no

State-sponsored effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder plan is under consideration. New teachers must pass a subject area test and on-the-job

assessment before nceiving permanent certification.

88

Hawaii (ContinuedHawaii

1929-80 Most Recent Year1/1M.Percent

ChangeAmnont Rank Ann4nt Rank Year

Title liChapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $11,890,296 39 S10,164,810 44 1984-65 -13.7

Total LEA grants %10,954.755 3U 19,o05.344 41 1984-85 -12.3

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1919-80 dollars t5,7.9b.314 43 1981-83 -51.7

to051.90U 42 1984-85 -39.3

State administration sot aside t225,0NU 44,51' W5,000 43.)1' t916 -d5 U

State administration set aside per operating LEA $225,000 2 $125,000 1.5f 1984-45 0


fide IiChapter 1 Participation Data

24,04h 41 23,285 43 1984-85 -19.H

Total number of participants 15,621 42 10,118 45 I981-H3 -34.2

Number of participants K-6 8,413 64 5,593 4d 19131-6.3

Number of participants 1-12 1,087 35 4,b85 J4 1982 -83 -33.9

Number of nonpublic participants 12b 41 234 45 1981 -83 -28.2


in Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) U.9 46 1980-81

Number of public participants 15,101 42 10,044 44 193Z-U3 -34,4

Percent of ail public school students served in

Title I/Chapter 1 9.1 32 b.2 44 1982-8J

Percent of students receiving reading 94.9 2 95.1 1 1962-03


Percent of students receiving Language arts U NA NA 1982-63


English-proficient U NA NA 1982-83

Percept of students receiving health and nutrition

services 0 NA AA 1982-83


guidance services U MA NA 1982-63

Title 1 /Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 552 46 194 46 1962-83 -46.7

Number of FTE teachers 355 J8 206 41 1982-83 -42.0

Number of FIE aides 194 45 32 51 1982-83 -63.5

Number of FIE adminiatracive staff 3 47 4 46 1982-03 33.3

Title I/Chaptec 1 pupil/staff ratio 28.3 44 35.0 47 i981-83 23.7

Title ItChapter 1 averagc per pupil expenditure 5701 9 $897 18 1982-83 -0.8


LEAs and the SEA encourages them 1984-85

Schoolwide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-85

'

419

Hawaii ( Continued ) Hawaii

1979-80 Mont Kecent fear

Amount Hank Amount gal% Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAR i 50.5C 1 50.5i 1982-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure $2.241 21 $3,182 It 1901-d3 41.0

Overall average per pupil expenditure In adjusted

1979-80 dollars 51,354 lb 1982-83 5.0


schools 16(1,64)0 41 162,024 40 198/-83 -4.9


schools 47,147 JO 1980-K1

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 18.4 2 1760-K1


and secondary schools 27,981 32 1980-81


affiliated schools 64.6 4J I91f0-81


Per capita income $9,141 14 $12,761 17 1944 39.6

R'fS tax capacity index 103 11f 117 7.5f 19b1



P.L. 94-142 10,501 44 12,1b1 43 L982-83 15.0


P.L. 89-313 881 43 715 42 1982-8) -18.8


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. U9 -313 combined. 5.9 50 1980-01


prnficlent 1.1 4 1980

School enrollment by rate


Percent Black 1.3 4L 19dd

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander e5.1 1 198U

Percent American indlanaskimo/Aleut U.3 35 1980



Distribution of children in poverty actoss LEAs

Percent of Children

Percenr of Districts in Poverty

Not applicable

Percent poor children in State in schools utth largest enrollment Not applicable

Percent poor children in State In 4 largest schools Not applicable

t,

90

Hawaii

Hawaii (continued)


No program



Grades assessed: 3, 9-12

Expected uses: high school graduation, remediation

First graduating class assessed! 1983


The State of Hawaii does not have a school planning requirement nor does it sponsor any effective

schools projects. Under the Early Provisions for School Success, all Kindergarten students are formally

assessed and their instructional programs are individualized.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder or merit pay program is under consideration. The State does not require testing for

initial certification but such a requirement is being considered.

1 1 0 91

Idaho

1179-80 4(11;t Recent ?ear

Percent

CungeAmqunt Rank Amount 8;w. Year

Hue I/Chapter 1 Allocatior Oita

Total allocation 39,41,512 44 612.55%1,147 J9 1104-65 25.0

fetal LEA grants hb,5;9,8M 0 $8,13L3,44 44 1904-43 31.1

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $5 Il-054 44 1982-81 -21.5

65,971.913 44 1984-d5 -9.2

State administration set aside t425.000 44.3f $215,UUU 43o1' 1984-d3 ti

State administration set aside per operating LEA 31.957 312 31.957 29 1984-8b 0

LEA child count for formula purposes 24,467 45 27,517 40 1984-d5 14.5


Total number of participants 16,197 41 13,498 40 1982-63 -13.0

Number of participants K-6 11.988 40 11,154 4U 1982-d3 -7.0

Number of participants 7-12 4,20o 41 2,133 42 1982-83 -3).0

Number of nonpublic participants 187 4e 10 411 042-63 -31.0

Percen: of all nonpublic school students served

in Title 1 /Chapter 1 (not available) 3.9 21 1980-81

Number of public participants 14.81U 4U 13,849 40 1902-di -13.4


Title i/Chapter 1 7.9 38 6.8 40 19132-83

Percent of students receiving reading 81.0 22 80.2 12 1982-8J


Percent of students receiving language arts e.9 21 7.1 23 1981 -dJ


English-proficient U.S 21 1.1 lb 198Z-B3


services 0 NA 0.1 27 1982-83

Percent of students receiving Attendance and

guidance services U.8 38 0.1 3d 1982-83


Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 817 40 548 40 1982-8i -32.9

Number of FTE teachers 22) 44 202 42 1982 -83 -10.2


Number of FIE administrative staff 25 35 17 Ji 1982-83 -34.0

Title //Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 19.8 10 25.5 22 1982-83 28.8

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $406 48 $499 44 1982-83 12.9

Instructional settings! Pullouts predominate in

LEAs and the SEA encourages them 1984 -83

Srhoolwide projects: None reported by SEA 194445

92

Idaho (continued) Idaho

1979-80 Most Necent Year

AMQUUL Amoont Rat* Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAN 115 Ji 115 37 1912-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure $L,584 4`, 51,994 4,1 19d2-113 15.1

Overall averaPe per pupil expenditure in adjnsted

1979-80 dollars $1.475 10 19K1 -RJ -b.9


schools 202,758 J9 102,913 39 1982-83 0.1


schools 5,1139 48 1980-H1

Percent of total enrollmenr in nonpub,a schools 2.8 44 198U-81


and secondary schools 5,4b2 41 1980 -81


affiliated schools 93.5 6 198O-111

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 299,086 J9 198u-81

Per capita income $1,375 39 $10,174 45 1984 3a.0

RIS tax capacity index 91 37.5i 86 41.1.5t 1982

Student. Characteristics


P.L. 94-142 17,491 39 17,211) 40 1982-83 -1.3


P.L. 89-313 575 4b 41.3 51 1982-83 -28.2


P.L. 96-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined ti.l 4P 1980-81

Percent of children aged 5 -11 limited-English-

proficient u.5 21 1980



Percent Black U.3 50 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 0.7 2o 19BU

Percent American IndiardEskimo/Aieut 1.5 13 1980


Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 13,4 26 1960


Percent of Children


Z1.1 0 10

57.0 11 20

14,9 21 30

1.0 31 - 40

5.3 > 4U

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 7.8 Boise Clty Independent

Percent poor children in State In 5 largest LW 20.4 Boise City Independent, Pocatello 25, Meridian.

idaho Valls 91, Coeur 0 Aleue

1 1 3'3

Idaho (continued)

Other State Frotrams


No program



Grades assessed: 8-12

Expected uses: remedlatlon



Idaho has neither State-sponsored effective schools projects nor a district or school plannin6

requirement.

Teacher reforms

1i :

In April 1964, the State legislature allocated $100,000 for the development of a pilot career ladder

program, guidelines for which the State Board is developing. Idaho does not require testing for the

initial certification of teachers.

94

1 i :;

190-40 !lost Recant Year

Amount Rink Amount R.tnK Year

Percent

Conge

ritle I/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $144,310,048 4 $172.;57,130 4 1984-85 19.7

Total LEA grants $121,813.1/2 5 t146,01i,JJ4 1984-65 10.5

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-40 dollars $89,821,041 4 1932-83 -2o.9

MI,b33,190 4 190-65 -1b.0

State administration set aside $2,132060 4 $1.019.348 4 1984-85 -4.1

State administration set aside per operatinK LEA $2,109 J2 11.001 34 1984-85 -23.0

LEA child count for formula purposes 01.98] 5 3420::18 419$6-85 3.1


Total number of participants 165.239 6 13),U51 9 1982-83 -18.8

Number of participants K-6 111,880 9 94,839 11 1942-83 -L9.5

Humber of participants 7-12 42,724 7 J6,047 1 1982-83 -20.3

Number of nonpublic participants 8,036 6 4,850 b 1932-10 -14.8


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 37 1930-81

Number of public participants 158,211.1 7 128,Z01 10 1982-83 -19.0


Title I/Chapter 1 1.1 43 6.8 41 1982-0

Percent of studenr2 receiving reading 85.1 15 80.3 21 1982-0

Percent of studena receiving math 22.6 3U 30.7 31 1982-83

Percent of students receiving language arts 4.4 2S b.o 24 1962-83

Percept of students receiving English for limited-

English-proficient 1.1 16 1.8 J. 1982-83


services 0 NA 1.0 21 1982-0

Petcent of students receiving attendance and

guidance services 1b.7 15 12.7 14 1982-0

Title I /Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FrE staff members 5,934 12 9 1982-83 -L6.0

Number of FTE teachers 3,477 4 2,850 5 1961-83 -L8.0

Number of FTE aides 1,539 20 157 23 1982-83 -50.8

Number of FTE admimistrative staff 127 13 211 3 1982-83

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 28.0 43 30.8 3b 1962-83 10.0

ritle I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $7J3 7 $891 3 1962-81 21.6


Mks and the SEA encourages them in certain

situations 1964-115

Schoolwide projects: Yea 1964-85

95

Illinois (continued)

1979-00 Most Accent Year

Amount Rank amonht gang fear

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 1,011 4 I . U08 i 1982-33 -0.1

Overall average per pupil expenditure t2,442 11 SJ,011 /1 i98/-d3 G1.3

01:erall average per pupil expenditure in adjusted

1979-80 dollars $2,227 21 1952 -di -10-1


schools 2,01,234 4 1.880,281 4 1942-di -5.0


schools 39,463 4 1980-d1

Percent of torai enrollment in nonpublic schools 15.0 10 1980-8l


and secondary schools 323,b81 4 19811 -81


affiliated schools 42,h 9 1900 -81

rota/ enrollment in elementary and secon4ary schools 2.J.1/,926 4 196U-ti1

Per capita income $9.7.41 7 S13,728 10 190 411.9

RTS tax capacity index 111 / 99 24r 7.981



P.L. 94-142 2/9,1111 3 223,3171 4 1982-83 1.9


P.L, 89-313 11,JOU I 38,408 I 1982-83 22.5


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 10.6 11 19no-81


proficient 1.49 1980


Percent White 76.4 3b 1980


Percenr Asian and Pacific Islander 1.5 11 1980

Percent American Indlan/Eskimo/Aleut U.2 42 1960

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 6,9 il 1980

Petcent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 14.1 23 1930


Percent of Children

Percent of Districts is Poverty

64.1 0 - 1U

30.9 11 - 20

4.1 21 JO

0.3 31 - 40

0.o -*** 40--.

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 46.9 City of Chicago

Percent poor children in State in 5 Largest LEAs 49.b City of Chicago, Township High 2L4 (Mt. Prospect),

Township dign 21 (Palatine), dnegiora,

Thornton Lownsap High

Illinois (continued)


State compensatory t.ducation program

No program



Grades assessed: decided at the local level

Expected uses; decided at the local level

First graduating class assessed: varies at the local level


School improvement activities in Illinois include the encouragement of systematic planning at the local

level. The State does not sponsor any effective schools projects. The Jtate Board of Education has

approved learning outcome requirements called Statements for Student Larding, These outcome statements

broadly define the least students should learn and be able to do as a result of their schooling in six

academic areas. Each school district will be required to develop objectives consistent with the outcome

statements and to monitor and assess student achievement. Schools will be required to report the

progress of their students to the public and to develop remediation plans for low achievement areas.

The program requires legislative action before implementation.

Teacher reforms

The legislature has approved $637,500 for a master teacher program. The Minds Education Association

has said that it will support an "equitable" career ladder bill. Testing for the initial certification

of teachers is under consideration.

97

title 1/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation

rotal LEA grants

rotal LEA grants In adjusted 1979-80 dollarn


State administration set aside per operattne LEA


Title IlChapter 1 Participatien Data


Number of participants X-6




in Title 1/Chapter 1



Title I/Chapter 1

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

English-proficient

Percent of students

services

Percent of students

guidance services

served

served to

receiving reading,

receiving math

receiving language arts

receiving English for limited-

receiving health and

receiving

nutrition

attnndance and

ride 1/Chapter I Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members

Number of FTE teachers

Number of FTE aides

Number of FTE administrative staff


Title i/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

Instructimal settings: Pullouts predominate in

LEAs and the SEA encourages them

1/19-8D Host Went Year

Pe :cent

ChangeAmount Rahlt Amount gm. Year

141,661084 2) S50,287,31.5 2l 1944-85 20.7

5.15,8)17.;93 25 1440)05,b78 21 1.984-85 24.4

S25,9b9,213 24 1932-83 -27.b

$i9,898,353 21 1984-4) -13.8

tb15,167 26 54110/9 11 1984-d5 -2.1.4

i2,02b J5 i3.551 J) 1984-8) -23.4

LA4792 22 1.3l,10 21 1984-0) 0.3

104,424 18 92.91 17 1902-83 -11.0

88,149 18 818.4 lb 1982-83 -4.9

14,1307 25 i3,r.d9 28 1982-83 -42.0

3,b55 lb 3,389 Li 1982-8i b.4

(tint available) 3.1 21) 198U-81 --

100,169 18 e9.038 17 1982-83 -11.b

9.3 29 8.9 23 1982-83

91.) J 85.0 LI 1.982-1$3

28.8 40 48.0 33 1982-83

2.; 35 1.9 Jb 1982-83

0 HA NA 1982-8i

1.2 32 1.0 20 1982-83

8.8 29 3.4 24 1982-8J

4,019 20 3.075 19 1982-83 -0.57b7 28 525 33 1982-83 -31.b

2,b20 12 2,370 15 1982-83 -9.2

14 23 41 27 1982-133 -44.o

2o.0 Jo 30.2 35 1982-83 16.2

$34.1 50 SJ78 5U 1.9d2-8.1 10.2

19d4-85

Selloolvide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-45

98

Indiana !continued)

L979-80 Host Recent fear

Amount RanK Amount Rank Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 304 20 304 20 1982-81 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,847 3Z $2,348 41 1982-63 naOverall average per pupil expenditure in adjusted

1979-80 dollars

tnrollnent in public elementary and secondary

schools 1,033,126 11

$1,751

999,542

41

12

1982-83

198243

-5.2

-7.4


schools 100,234 15 1980-81





affiliated schools 92.b 1U 1980-81

'Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 1,155,823 12 1980-81

eet capita income 18.353 27 311,799 31 1984 41.3

RTS tax capacity index 98 29 89 Jur 1982


Lumber of handicapped children served under

P.L. 94-142 92,072 14 92,9b5 i6 1981413 1.0


P.L. 89-313 6,746 10 7,263 9 1982-43 7.7



Percent of children aged 5-17 Ilmited-anglish-



Percent White 89,2 20 1980


Percent Wall and Pacific islander 0.5 35 1980






Percent of Children

in Poverty

58.5 0 10

38.5 Ii 20

2.7 21 - 30

0,3 31 40

U 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 13.5 Indianapolis

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 31.1 Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Uary, South fiend,

Evansville-Vanderburgh

Indiana (continued)



Program will begin in the 1985-86 school year.

Funding approach: sufficient funds to remediate 15 percent of students in need" in each LEA; estimated

at a per pupil amount of 000.

Targeting approach: focus on students in grades 3, b, and one other grade to be determined; cut-off

test scores have not yet been decided







There are no State-sponsored effective schools projects in Indiana. The State does not require district

or school planning.

Teacher reforms

1" "

A career ladder program is under consideration. Teachers who are dew or transferring from outof-state

must pass basic skills and subject area tests for certification.

100

1011A

1979-80 Host Roccot i4r

Percent

ChnogeAmount Rank Amount !tam( frdr

ritle L/Chapter L Allocation Data

Total allocation $26,995.78 II 328,07.,20o .14 1984-$5 4.0

Total LEA grants 525,2'12,95) il 826,856.384 A 1984-d5 b.2

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $17.691.112 JO 19d2-83 -30.0

S18098.oUd 3.1 1184-85 -16.5

State administration set aside $JJ8,952 31 t2o3.1;8 J4 1984-85 -34.0



i897

76.738

47

31 64;:49

A1914-85

1984-85

-33.4

-15.7


Total number of participants 46,OU7 31 40,225 29 082-83 -13.7

Number of participants i-b 37,417 31 34.547 28 1982-83 -7.1


Number of nonpublic participants 3.914 15 ..1.209 15 1982-43 -16.o


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not awiliabie) o.7 6 1980-81

Number of public participants 42,088 31 Jb495b 29 1982 -83 -13.4


Title 1/Chapter 1 7.8 42 7.3 35 1982 -0

Percent of students receiving reading 86.3 12 tio.i 8 1982-83

Percent of students receiving math 18.4 41 40.g 15 198283

Percent of students receiving language arts 0.3 43 -- NA :982-83


EaglIsh-protIcient 0.3 24 NA 1962-83


services 2.4 24 _- NA 1982-83


guidance services

nth 1/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

U.9 37 -- NA 1982-83

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 1,955 3U 1,174 34 1982-83 -34.9

Number of FTE teachers 1,588 22 1,063 23 1482-83 -33.1

Number of FTE aides 231 43 89 46 1982-83 -o1.5

Number of FIE administrative staff U NA U NA 1482-83 --

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 23.8 27 34.2 45 1981-83 43.7

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $543 29 S595 24 1962-0 9.b



them 1984-85

Scant:amide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-65

1?

Iowa (continued)


smoent Rank AM6UhL Kau Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 445 1.1 441 13 1942-43 -0.9

Overall average per pupil expenditure (,2,251 2U $ J. UR 19 191,2-43 34.b

Overall average per pupil expenditure in Adjusted

1979-80 dollars 52.243 19 1942-83 -0.4


schools )44, 117 28 144,943 28 1942-43 -7.9


schools 5),227 25 1940-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 9.4 24 1940-d1




affiliated schools 92.6 i 1940-41

Total enrollment in elementary And secondary schools 589.084 27 1980-41

Per capita income $8,689 20 S12,090 JU 1984 39.1

RIS tax capacity index lihi 14.5f 9b tt.r 1942



P.L. 94-142 58,010 2b 55,329 27 1941 -43 -4.b

Number of handicapped children served uncier

P.L. 89-313 959 41 780 41 1981-81 -18.7




proficient 0.J 35 1980


Percent White 9t.7 4 1980


Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 0.6 29 198U

Percent American Indlan/Eski&o/Alent 0.3 3U 1980


Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 10.8 41T 1940

Distribution of children In poverty across LEAs

Percent of Children


40.4

44.7

12.2

2.5

0.2

0 10

11 20

21 - 30

31 4U

> 40

Percent ponr children In State In 11A with largest enrollment

Percent poor children in State In 5 largest LEAs

102

7.4 Des Moines Independent

19.2 Iles dollies Independent, Davenport, Cedar Kapids,

Duhuqua, Waterloo

Iowa (continued)



No program


No progam established at the State level


The State requires each district to determine education needs, develop long range plans and priorities,

update these plans annually, and maintain a record of progress. There are no Statesponsored effective

schools projects.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder plan is being considered. A new certification system has been established requiring

teachers to pass basic skills and subject area tests.

103 1 P.

1979-80 *int Rerent feat

Percent

ChangeAmnont dank Amunnt RAM( Year

fitle liChIpter 1 Allocation iLits

Total allocation $2J.012.44b J5 $15,168,241 35 1964-85 9.1

Total LEA grants t20,J14,289 35 t21,27b,445 35 1984-85 4.7

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars S14,260,549 45 1982-83 -29.8

114,114,373 35 1984-0 -27.5

:tate administration set aside t340,085 35 t235,382 31 1184-85 -10.8

State administration set aside per operating LEA $1,108 44 '1764 47 1984-85 -30.6

LEA child count for formula purposes bb,499 34 49,59) 35 1984-0 -25.4

Title I/Chapter 1 Particigtion Data

Total number of participants 40,tld4 32 36,493 JO 1982-83 -5.8

Number of participants E-6 NM) 33 29,305 JU 1982-83 -4.1

Number of participants 7-12 9,315 31 H.334 29 1982-83 -10.J

Number of nonpublic participants 2,144 20 20 1982-81 -27.J


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available/ 5.7 11 1980-81

Number of public participants 38,741 34 46.936 311 1982-83 -4,7


Title 1/Chapter 1 9.2 JO 9.1 22 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 74./ J1 70.8 42 1982-84


Percent of students receiving language arts NA 4.0 26 1942-84


English-proficient 0 4A 0.6 /0 1982-83


services 0 NA NA 1982-B3


guidance services U.4 41 0.5 37 1882-83


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 1,497 35 1,188 33 1982-83 -MbNumber of FIE teachers 855 21 bg 28 I582-83 -20.0

Number of FIE aides 547 35 417 J5 1982-83 -23.8

Number of FIE administrative staff 43 JU 26 34 1982-43 -39.5

ritie I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 27.3 40 32,4 39 1482-83 18.7

little I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

lnstructional settings: Pullouts predominate in

E49? J6 E50i 41 1942-43 0.8


Schnoloide projects: dot available 1944-85

12'104

Kansas (continued?

1979-M0 Host decent Year.,,,,,,........

Amount Rams Amount Kant Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 307 19 306 14 1982-83 -U.S


(heal], average per pupil expenditure In adjusted

t2,098 13 t2,989 23 1982-83 42.5

1979-80 dollars $2,211 23 1982-83 5.4


schools 422,924 33 407,074 33 1982-83 -3.7


schools 33,889 32 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 7.5 10 1980-8L




affiliated schools 89,6 15 1980-81

festal enrollment is elementary and secondary schools 449,160 13 1980-81

Per capita income 0,145 LI 313,319 12 1984 45,6

US tax capacity index 109 ur 10b lb.Jf 1942



P.L. 94-142 36,784 33 42,227 31 1982-03 14,8


P.L. 89-313 1,949 30 1,932 30 1982-83 -0.9



Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-F.Aglish-



Percent White 89.8 19 198U


Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 0.9 17 198U

Percent American Indian /Eskimo /Aleut 0.9 20 1980




Percent of Children


40,4 0 - 10

47.9 11 20

10.8 ll 30

1.0 31 - 40

0 > 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA Wm largest enrollment 14.6 Wichita 29

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 34.b Wichita 259, Shawnee lission 51, Kansas City 5U,

ropeka 501, Olathe 233

I 2C;105

Kansas (continued)

Other State Pro rams


The 1985 session of the State legislature is considering a program.



Gr'des assessed: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10

Expected uses: decided at the local level



Beginning September 1985, districts must report their educational goals and curriculum objectives.

There are no Statesupported effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The SEA is required to implement a master teacher program by 1989. Certification tests are required for

prospective teachers.

1,3 0106

Kentucky

0/9-80 Host ascent Year

Amount Rank Amount Rank fear

Percent

Cnange

title 1/Chanter 1 Allocation Oata

Total allocation $62.163,83/ 18 3513,111,100 18 1984-85 -t.5

Total LEA grants 555,719,08 11 $52.848.352 18 1984-0 -.1Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars 07024,111

1.16.t/0.24)

III

01982-83

1984-45

-9.:2

-34,3

..ate administration set aside 1916007 11 g54401.1b 18 1484-H5 -411.7

State administration set aside pet operating LEA 35,016 19 13.027 22 1984-85 -40.4

LEA child count for formula purposes 211,59J lb 1b4,?59 lb 1984-0 -22.4




114,841

9.1,089

ib

10

W2,625

8.10108

1.5

11

1982-83

1982-8i

-18.7

-111.b

Number of participants 7-12 '1,063 ib

192:li

g6822:8621

-6.1

Number of nonpublic participants 2,901 11 Lb -1.5,9


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 4.5 17 1980-81 --

Number of public participants 111,185 lb 100,129 15 1982-83 -9.9


Title I/Chapter 1 16.4 7 15.1, b 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 87.5 It) 88.1 S 1982-63

Petceot of students receiving math 23.4 4i 21.8 44 19R2-83

Percent of students receiving language arts 1.2 39 -- NA 1962-8J

Percept of students receiving English fot limited-

English-proficient U NA NA 1982-83


services 21.7 10 1/.0 10 1982-83


guidance services

title 1/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

41.0 3 32.7 4 1982-BJ

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FrE staff members 3,944 21 3,000 20 1982-83 -Z3.9

Number of FTE teachers 2,859 15 1,10U 17 1982-83 -17.4

Number of FTE aides 1,348 22 937 19 1982-83 -3G.5

Number of FTE administrative staff 181 19 Bi 19 1982-83 -19.11

title 1/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 29.1 46 34,2 44 1982-83 11.5

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 1485 38 549b 46 1982-83 2.3

Instructionnl settings: Pullouts predominate in


them 1984-85

Schoolwide projects: none reported by SEA 1984-85

LiWI

Kentucky (continued)

1919-80 Most decent year

Amount Ranx Amount Rant. Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 181 2d. ±l' 180 29 1982-83 -0.6

Overall average per pupil expenditure 31,50 40 $1,999 5 1982-83 17.5


1979-80 dollars 31,479 45 1982-83 -5.7


schools 677,123 I3 651,084 2.1 1982-83 -3.8

Enrollment la lunpublic elementary and secondary

schools 61,72M 21 1980-31

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schoole 9.4 13 198U-81

Enrollment In religiously affiliated elementary

and secondary schools )8,h95 18 19811 -bi

Percent of nonpublic earOilment in religiously

affiliated schools $4.2 24 198U-81

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 179,526 2J 1988-81

Per capita income $1.095 45 SlU,Ji4 42 1984 46.4

ITS tax capacity Inuex 85 41.51 81 44.51 1982



P.L. 94-142 64,448 21 70,012 22 1982-83 8.6


P.L. 89-313 2,639 24 3,148 21 1982-83 19.3


P.L. 94 -14Z and P.L. 59-313 combined 9.6 13 1980-81


proficient 0.2 47 19d0




Percent Asian and Pacific islander U.3 46 1940

Percent Anti= Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.1 51 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 0.8 44 19d0

Percent of children aged 5-l7 in poverty 21.2 7 1980


Percrit of Children

Percent of DistrictS in Poverty

8.9 0 - 10

32.2 11 20

32.2 21 30

18.3 31 - 40

8.3 40

Percent poor children In gtate in LEA with largest enrollment

Percent poor children In State in 5 largesr LEAs

1 10K

12.7 Jefferson County (Louisville)

21.0 Jefferson !Aunty klooisviLlel, Fayette County

(Lexington), Pike Cnuo1v, Kenton County,

ilacd(n County

---

Kentucky (continued)



Program will begin in the 1905-66 school year

Funding approach: for every 13 students who score 26 percent below the acceptable level on the

Essential Skills Test at the end of kindergarten, 1st or 2nd grade and for every ZO students who score

10-25 percent below the acceptable level, the State will allocate money for one additional. teacher;

program appropriations total_ $lb million.

Targeting approach: Essential Skills Test scores will be used to select students; the program will

focus on grades 1 and 2.




Districts are required to develop fiveyear school improvement plans. The State does not sponsor any


Teacher reforms

A State committee has been established to study career ladders. New teachers must pass competency tests

and complete one year internships for permanent certification.

109

Lo Whine

197g-HO Host Recent Year

Amount Rank Amoont dank fear

Percent

Change

Title I/Chapter I Allocation Data

Total allocation $90,127,435 10 1102,625,252 10 1944-45 13.9

Total LEA grants t82mod74 10 1,49,417.489 10 1914-45 9.1

Total LEA grants in adjusted L979 -8U dollars $55.010,430 10 1962-83 -11.1

Sn2,100,754 10 1944-45 -24.4

State administration set aside $1,331,931 10 $962,082 1.0 1944-45 -27.8

State administration set aside per operating LEA 120,181 5 314.577 5 1984-45 -27.8

LEA child count for formula purposes 311,431 8 123,154 10 (944-85 -28.7


153,100 7 101,043 ib 1982-83 -34.1:.tai number of participants

Number of participants K-6 114,3b0 11 45,710 15 1941-83 -25.1

Number of participants 7-12 45.758 5 12,668 19 1982-83 -72.3

Number of nonpublic participants 7,311 1 5,J42 IU 1982-83 -27.1


is Title I/Chapter I (not available) 4.8 13 1980-81

Number of public participants 155,781 8 95,701 16 1981-83 -38.6


Title I/Chapter 1 19.5 1 12.3 9 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading b4.3 4/ b9.0 44 1962-83


Percent of students receiving Language arts U.S 40 9.1 lb 19d2-B1Percent of students receiving English for limited -

English- proficient 0 NA NA 1942-83


services 4b.7 3 21.4 7 1942-83


guidance services 51.9 30.2 6 19112-43


Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 6,033 9 4.082 12 1982-83 -32.3

Number of FTE teachers L,71b £9 1,195 21 1982-83 -30.4


Number of FTE administrative staff 93 21 9U 16 1982-di -3.2

Title I/Chapter 1. pupil/staff ratio 27.0 39 24.8 20 1982-83 -6.1

Title I/Chapter i average per pupil expenditure $A4 34 i136 14 1981-83 4b.0

Instructional settings; Pullouts do not predominate

in LEAs and the SEA does not encourage or

discourage them 1984-85

Schoolwide projects; Not available 1984-d)

110

Louisiana (continued)

1q71-8O Most Kecene !oar

Amount 4ank Ammint RaOK irar

Percent

ChaaRe


Number of operating LEAs hh 41 hb 41 1942-83 U

Overall average per pupil expenditure tl.e.le e, z $2.4.1L IL 1982-83 60.9


1979-80 dollars 11,147 32 1982-83 19.0


schools 800.4_0 18 7;5,06 18 1941-43 -3.1


schools 08.921 10 1980-81

Percent of total entailment in nonpublic schools 17.0 5 080-el


and secondary schools 148,745 11 19d0-81



Total enrollment in elementary and secnndary schools 938,481 17 198o-81

Per capita Income $7,458 37 310,650 37 1944 45.5

RTS tax capacity index 104 18.5C 113 14 1982


Number cf handicapped children served under

P.L. 94-142 79,452 19 80,532 18 1982-83 1.4


P.L. 89-313 6,188 11 5,477 10 1982-63 -11.5

Percent of total school enrolloenc served by

P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 8.8 32 198U-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-Enelish-



Percent White 63.5 47 19d0

Percent Black 35.2 4 198U


Percent Americas Indian /Eskimo /Aleut

U.7 28

'231J.5r

illPercent of school. enrollment of Spanish origin 198U

Percent of children aged 5-17 in pvvertY 2023.361 198U

Distrib..tinn of children in poverty across LEAs


Percent of Children

in Poverty

0 0 10

30,3 11 - 20

33.3 21 - 30

28.8 31 - 40

7.6 > 4U

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 19.7 Orleans Parish (New Orleans)

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 39.4 Orleans Parish (New Orleans), Jefferson Par.sn

(Gretna), East Ilaton Rouge Parish, Caddo Paitsn

(Shreveport), Calcasieu Parish

Ill

Louisiana (continued)



Allocations

1979-80 not applicable; program began in the 1982-83 school year

1984 -a5 18.8 million


1984-85 8.6%

Funding approach: based on the number of students failing to achieve a certain performance standard on

the State Basic Skills Test.

Targeting approach: students failing to achieve a certain performance standard on the State Basic

Skills Test


1984-85 33,989 remediation units; one student can constitute more than one unit



Grades assessed: 2-5 (grade 8 will be added in the 1986-87 school year)

Expected uses: grade promotion, remediation



Districts are required to develop a pupil progression plan based on student performance in the

assessment program. Mastery of basic skills is emphasized and is used as the main criterion for

promotion and placement. A school effectiveness program was piloted in about 20 percent of the LEAs

during 1)83. The development of pilot programs for 4-year-olds with poor language skills has been

approved by the legislature.

Teacher reforms

The legislature hts established a commission to study the Governor's proposed career ladder plan.

Testing is required for initial certification.

112 1" )

1919-48 lost Recent Yenr

Amount Rank Anoint

Elite I/0hapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation 313,1 43,167 38 i15.910.112

Total LEA grants


t10,181,65539 i=,h41.3

sn,462,u4L

State administration set aside ;225,800 44.51 t125,808

State administration set aside per opvrating 11.A $991 45 3988

LEA child count lot formula purposes 38,459 38 11439


Total number of participants 28,480 37 21,514

Number of participants K-b 2/.0.31 3b

i9Number of participants 7-12 4,449 40 3,T3

Number of nonpublic participants 838 35 745


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 4.6

Number of public participants 25,842 31 11,829


title I/Chaptet 1 11.3 17 10.3

Percent of students receiving reading 78.9 29 88.8

Percent of students receiving math - 35.1 20 37.3

Percent of students receiving language arts lb.0 7 15.8


English-proficient 0 NA --


services L. 28 0.3

Percent of students teceiving attendance and

guidance services 10.6 25 b.9


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 1,387 36 1,059

Number of FTE teachers 238 41 146

Number of FTE aides 904 30 /0Number of FTE administrative staff 0 NA U

Title I/Chal.tet 1 pupil/staff ratio 19.1 8 21.3

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 5385 49 $413



them

Schoolwide projects: None reported by SEA

113

Rank

311

il

38

-(1.1.5r

41

31

36

36

40

31.1

14

36

...111

fear

Percent

Change

1944-85 15.8

1984-8) MO1982-83 -38.8

199= 1'41984-85 -2.5

1984-85 -3.1

1982-83 -14.8

1182-83 -11.13

1982-83 -25.3

1902-0 -11.1

1980-81. --

1982-83 -14.1

in

119118 --:3 318 9

20

119948L211.118

aA 1982-83

21 1982-83

19 1982 -83

36 1982-81 -23.b

44 1982-83 -38.7

22 1982-83 -15.4

NA 1942-83 --

10 1982-83 11.5

49 1982-83 9.9

1984-85

t984-85

Maine (continued)

197q-40 nsC IterquI. Year

Amu nst Rank Amount ;tanK Year

Percent

Ch.inge

State Charreteristies

Number of operating LEAs 221 24 23! 14 1942-83 2.0

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,442 40 52,31).1 39 1982-4.: 42.3


1979-80 dollars 51,770 39 1982-83 5.2


schools 227,823 34 211,986 38 1982-83 -7.0


schools 17,540 40 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools ;A 33 198081


and secondaty schools 9.538 42 198U-81




Per capita income ib,959 47 J19,08 40 1944 53.4

RfS tax capacity index 80 47 u4 42.5f 1942



P.L. 94-142 12,782 37 24,824 38 1982-8d 9.0


P.L. 89-313 1,525 34 1,656 32 1982-83 8,4








Percent Asian and Pacific Islander U.3 50 198U


Percent of school pnrolinent of Spanish origin U.4 51 1980

Percent of children aged 5-17 La poverty 15.1 18.51' 1940

Distribution e. children in pcierty across LEAs

Percent of Children

Percent of Olatricts in Poverty

27.0 0 10

39.9 11 - 20

19.8 21 30

50 31 4U

7.4 1> 40

Percent poor chilriren in State in LEA with largest enrollmeur

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs

5.o Portland

14.i Portland, Lewiston. Bangor, Auburn. South Portland

# '

Maine (continued)



No program




The Maine Assessment and Planning for Schools program is a set of Statedeveloped guides for districts

implementing a performance-based approach to instruction. The guides describe six phases of program

improvement including preplanning and organizing. Several schools In the State are implementing


Teacher reforms

The legislature has approved three levels of teaching certificates leading to Easter teacher, which will

become effective in 1988. Competency testing is required tl en'er the teaching profession beginning in

1986.

115

142

019-no most Kerent fear

Percent

ChangaAmount kank Amnon Rank Year

Title 1/Chapter 1 Allocation 04ta

Total allocation $51,831.5b1 21 $55,/47.17o 19 1964-8) 4.0

total LEA grants t46.191,b52 21 $51,487,719 19 1984-45 b.6

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-60 dollars 3JU,931,1411 21 1.982-81 -.15.8

SJ5,587,UoJ 19 1984-8) -4b.2

State administration set aside $792.584 /1 $511.832 L9 (984-0 -34.7

State administration set aside per operating UA 3.1.1,024 3 111,576 J 1984-85 -44.7

LEA child count for formula purposes 123,427 15 107./28 /3 1964-8) -13.0

Title 1 /Chapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 63,244 27 ib,U47 lb 1982-83 -1.1.5

Number of participants K-6 59,828 1J 55.471 2U 19U-d3 -7.3

Number of participants 7.12 3,101 44 208 51 1982-84 -93.!

Number of nonpublic participants 2,461 19 1,197 ll 1981413 -51.8


in Title 1 /Chapter 1 (nqt


available)

bV,804 17

2.4

54,84U

Jb

IS

1940-81

1.182-8S -9 4

Percent of all public school students served In

Title I/Chapter 1 7.4 4U 7.8 J4 1982-83

Percent of studerts receiving reading 85.5 14 84.4 13 1981-83


Percent of students receiving languagL arts

54.2

U

4

NA

58.7 5

NA 9119484/1-1

Percept of students receiving English for limited-

English-proficient 0 NA NA 1982-83


services 27.8 6 21.3 d 1982-83


guidance services

fitle I/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

1U.9 24 11.5 lb 1982-83


Number of FIE teachers 704 31 01 29 1982-83 -3.6

Number of FIE aides 2,7B6 1U 1,789 1U 1982-83 ..15.6

Number of FTE administrative staff 51 27 47 25

1199:;--8833

-7.5

Title 1/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 15.0 2 2U.3 7 35.3

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

instructional settings: Pullouts do not predominate

in LEAs and the SEA does not encourage or discourage

them

them

$762 6 6746 12 1982-44

1904-85

-L.1

Schooluide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-85

l4

1lb

Mary an coat mUe

1971-80 Most Recent fear

state Characteristics

Number of operating LEAs



1979-80 dollars


schools


schools

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools


and secondary schools


affiliated schools

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools

Per capita income

KIS tax capacity index



P.L. 94-142


P.L. 89-313

Amount ;tank AIGOIntL Rank

24 41 ,:4 47

$1444 14 SJ,Jol 9

12,444 9

777,;25 20 b99,201 22

106,447 1.4

11.4 Id

87,)511 15

42..1 21

W,i12 19

19,313 14 S14,111 d

91 Zti LOU 21.)f

90,039 lo 88.07b 17

3,724 lb 2.801 2o

Percent

Year Change

1982-83 U

1982-83 35.3

1982-83 0.1

1982-83 -10.1

1988-81

1910-41

1980-81

1940-131

1980-81

1984 31.5

1982

1982-8i -2.2

1982-83 -24.7



Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-iinglish-



7:7:23

441980Percent White

Percent Black 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 1.8 b 198U





Percent of ChiiJren


37.5 0 - 10

58.3 11 - 20

0 21 - JO

4.2 31 40

0 > 40

Percent pour children In State in LEA with largest enrollment 41.4 Baltimore City

Percent pour children in State in 5 largest LEAN 73.1 Baltimore aty, Prince Ceurges County,

Baltimore County, Anne Arundel lAnnapolisl

1145"

Maryland (continued)

Other State Projrams


Allocations

1979-80 $14.7 million

1984-05 $14.8 million



1979-80 27.47;

1984-85 26.8%

Funding approach: formula utilizes pet pupil amount based on the number of Chapter 1 eligibles.

Baltimore receives an additional per pupil allocation based on enrollment, which is called Density Aid,

two-thirds of which must be used for compensatory education; for school year 1984-85, Baltimore received

an additional tl0.8 million.

Targeting approach: students in prekindergarten-12, who are identified through standardized tests or

State functional reading tests, and who attend Chapter 1 eligible schools or schools with educational

needs based on standardized tests.

Humber of students served

1979-80

1984-85


146

16,000 (estimate)

17,075 (estimate)





118

147

Maryland (continued)


In Maryland, school improvement activities are coordinated under Project Basic, which requires all Las

to develop and implement a plan using the State model. The plan must show (1) that the local

instruction program is amount with statewide required competencies, (2) that a testing program and a

method of maintaining student achievement test results have been developed and (3) that a remediation

program is available for failing students. Through the School Improvement Through Instructional Process

program, the State provides funds and technical assistance to districts wanting to improve instructional

delivery by implementing National Diffusion Network models. Maryland has a State-initiated and funded

prekindergarten progru,.. targeted on areas where third grade reading scores have been low, In January

1985, the Governor proposed adding $1 million to this $2.2 million program. There are no

State-sponsored effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

No statewide career ladder or merit pay programs have been reported in Maryland. The State does not

require testing for initial certification.

148119 149

Massachusetts

1979-10 most decent Year

Percent

CndngeAmount Rank Amount dam rear

fItle 1 /Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $70,J58.771 15 $64,U1o,405 12 1984-65 19.9

foul LEA grants /6%950M I' tbl,i9b,097 li 1964-45 15.7

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars 5349425.On 17 198/-83 -/8.9

P46,9)0.20) 1.3 1984-85 -13.1)

State administration set aside $1,03b,628 15 Skid. /lib 12 1984-0 -14.0

State administration set aside per operating LLA $l,921 21 42,24b A 1964-e5 -23.3

LEA child count for formula purposes 131,94; 21 10).716 ld 1984-85 11.2

Title i /Chapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 81,574 22 72,501 20 1982-8.3 -11.1

Number of participants K-6 61,476 22 54,1ib 21 198/-83 -11.8

Number of participants 7-12 17,60 2(1 1b,2J5 15 1982-83 -8.1

Number of nonpublic participants A,181 5 7,105 5 1982-8i -11.9


in Title 1/Chapter 1 {tint aviiIihle) 7.0 3 1960-81

Humber of public participants 73,nd 23 15,29fi 21 1964-83 -11.0


Title 1/Chapter 1 7.1 44 7.2 38 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 72.3 39 70.o 33 19112 -63

Percent of students receiving math 28.3 38 14.5 4U 1981-83


Percent of students receiving English Eor limited-

Eng1.1.0-proficient 2.7 10 1.0 17 1982-81

Percent of students receiving health and nuttition

services 13.3 15 15.1 11 1982-83


guidance services 5.0 32 3.3 25 1982-83

Title I/Chapter I Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 5,151 14 3,423 lb 1982-83 -33.5

Number of PTE teachers 2,418 11 1,671 14 1982-83 -23..i

Humber of FIE aides 2,102 lb 1,033 17 1962 -83 -50.9

NImber of FTE administrative staff 160 6 122 8 1982-81 -23.8


Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $01 12 $715 15 1982-61 11.1

Instructional settings: Pullouts predominate In



150I/O

Meesechusetts Continued

1917-8U ;lost Recent Year

Amlunt Hank Amount Xdok Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 354 17 3)1 17 1982-83 -0.H



52.i31 5 $3,304 11 1942-d3 11.0

1979-80 dollars


12044 11 1942-83 -10.5

schools 1,035,724 13 904,944 14 1982-83 -11.2


schools 134,333 12 19811-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schnnla 11.9 17 111.10-81

Enrollment in religiously affiliated elementar)

and secondary schools L09,928 13 1980-61



Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools

l'bIltrj)174

11 198U-81

Pet capita income $9,014 17 5 1984 61.7

11/S tax capacity index 9.3 34f 1111 20 1942



P.L. 94-142 128,009 10 124,1b3 jil 1982-43 -3.0


PA. 89-313 13,6b0 5 14,317 5 1982-81 3.3


P.L, 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 12.2 1 1900 -di


proficient 1.1 13 1981)





Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.2 39 19e0


Percent of children aged 5-17 la poverty i2.3 33 19d0


Percent of Children


66.3 U - 1U

29,J 11 - 2U

4,2 21 - 30

0.3 31 - 40

U > 40

Percent poor children la State in LEA with largest enrollment 17.4 Rolston

Percent poor children in State In S largest Lifts 32.8 Anston. Springfield, Worcester, Brockton,

New hedford

121 151

Massachusetts (continued)



No program



grades assessed: decided at the local level

Expected uses: not available

First graduating class assessed: varies at the local level


Districts in Massachusetts are required to set minimum standards of student achievement, to assess

student performance in basic skills, and to provide rewediation. Much local discretion is permitted in

program planning with technical assistance available from the SEA. The State does not sponsor any


Teacher reforms

A major reform bill died in the legislature during l984. It included stipends for teachermentors and a

competency exm for prospective teachers. A similar bill is expected to be introduced during the 1960

session.

122

152

153

Michigan

191V-HO

Amount


Total allocation

rotal LEA grants





Title I/chapter 1 Participation Data",


Number of participants 1(-4



Percent 0 all nonpublic school students

in title 1/Chapter i



Title I/Chapter 1

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

English-proficient

Percent of students

services

Percept of students

guidance services

Title I/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics',

Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FTE staff members

Number of FIE teachers

Number of FTE aides


Title I/Chapter 1 pupli/staff ratio

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

served

served In

receiving reading

receiving math







them

Schoolwicle projects: None reported by SEA

$143.955,109

$116,818,110

11,971,641

$3,455

31b,904

10,449

123,957

38,2b2

4,81d

(not available)

164,b41

8.9

89.o

56.0

4,0

U.5

14.3

14.0

1,995

4,841

266

24.6

t690

Most Recent Tzar

Rank Amount dank Year

Percent

Change

h $1380910,579 7 1984-05 3.4

b $121,04,441 7 1984-0 4.3

370,471.097 o 1982-83 -34.5

$84.49.1,ouL 7 I984-85 -OAto 31,298,U50 7 1984-85 -34.4

15 32,209 25 1984-85 -34.3

7 2ba,2118 a 1984-85 -16.0

5 i43,271 7 1981-d2 -15.4

1 1lb,244 b 1981-d2 -b.2

9 23,415 10 1981-82 -38.6

12 4,0b8 11 1981-82 -3.1

2,4 35 1980-81

5 UMW 7 19B1-82 -15.6

33 7.9 33 1981-82

a 88.1 4 1981-82 4110

5 51.2 9 1981-82

30 4.7 17 1981-82

20 0.2 22 1981-82

13 9.6 12 1981-82

18 2L.9 11 1981-82

5 5,936 5 i981 -82 -13.9

10 1,85.1 15 1961-82 -7.1

4 3,172 3 1981-82 -19.1

2I8 2 1981-82 -18.0

10 24.1 19 1981-82 -2.0

11 $7Z1 8 1981-82 4.1)

1984-85

1984-45

* ED does not have TIERS data from nichigan for 1982-81. Therefore, 1981-82 data have open used as estimates.

154

Miehipn Continued )


Amount Maur. Amoant Rank

.ercent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 57.1 1 S72 9 1982-83 -0.4

Overall average per pupil expenditure $2,541 H $3,134 12 1941-84 27..1

Overall average per pupa expenditure in adjusted

1979-80 dollars $2,192 IL 1942-83 -5.9

Enrollment is public elementary and secondary

schools 1,860,498 7 1,761.J21 7 1982-A3 -5.3


schools 211,871 7 198U-81



and secondary schools 195 ,043 1 1940-41

Percent of nonpublic enrollment in religinunq

affiliated schools 92.5 ll 1980-81

total enrollment in elementary and seconder/ schools 1.075,29U 7 198U-81

Per capita income 59,239 11 412,518 2J 1984 35.5

RTS tax capacity index 104 18.51 93 JO 1982


Humber of handicapped children served under

P.L. 94-142 143.913 1 145,375 9 1982-83 1.0


P.L. B9 -313 11,472 7 10,396 6 1942-83 -9.4






Percent White 82.0 28 :980



Percent American Indian /Eskimo /Aleut U.7 21 1980



Distribution of children in poverty across LEAS

Percent of Children


48.4 0 - 10

42.8 11 - 2U

6.4 21 3U

1.7 31 - 40

0.7 4U

Percent poor children In State in LEA with largest enrollment 31.8 uetroit

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest r.,ts 38.0 Detroit. Flint, Crand Rapids, Utica Community,

Warren Consoll4ated

155124

Michigan (continued)



Allocations

1979-80 $31.9 million

1984-85 04.9 million



1979-80 24.6%

1984-85 17.3%

Funding approach: per pupil amount based on number of low achievers on State assessment. LEAs with

13.7% or more K-10 students in low achieving groups are eligible.

Targeting approach: students one or more years below grade level (for grades 3-19), scoring in the

lowest quartile, or "demonstrating need of readiness.*

Number of students eligible

1979-80 131,734

1984-85 106,557



Grades assessed: 4, 7, 10



156

125

15.7

Michigan (continued)


Since the mid 1970's, Michigan has been strongly supportive of effective schools activities. Much of

the early research was done in cooperation with the regional Title I Technical Assistance Center. More

recently, the State has been involved in expanding the scope of effective schools activities to include

all schools. One component of these activities is the design and implementation of a school improvement

plan.

Teacher reforms

No career ladder or merit pay programs have been reported in Michigan. The State does not require

testing for Initial certification.

158 126

159

Minnesota

1979-30 Host Recent fear

fear

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank donut Rank

fitle E/Chaptet 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $42,777,480 24 $39,282,005 28 084-85 -8.2

fatal LEA grants tJ9,249,529 24 1,30.d09.078 24 1984-85 -b./

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars 325.940.042 25 1982-43 -33.9

525,411,40 24 19t14-$5 -35.I

State administration set aside 5432,178 24 $308,103 28 1964-45 -41.7

State administration set aside per operating LEA $1,440 40 $447 45 1984-85 -41.1

LEA child count for formula purposes 1;0,038 2b 84,414 48 00-0 -13.2


Total number of participants 72,217 14 55,535 27 1982-33 -23.i

Number of participants K-6 62,46o 21 51,468 23 1982-83 -17.0

Number of participants 7-12 9,753 2.9 4,028 35 1982-83 -58.7

Number of nonpublic parti-Apants 0,919 4 5,388 9 1962-83 -22.1

Percent of all nonpublic school students servtl

In Title tiChapter 1 (not available) to.; 5 1980-81

Number of public participants 65,308 2b 50,147 27 1982-83 -23,2


Title 1/Chapter 1 8.4 35 7.0 39 1982-83


Percent of students receiving math 71.0 1 68.1 2 198Z-83

Percent of students receiving language its 3.7 31 14 1982-43


English- proficient 11.5 22 DA 1982-83


services 1.4 29 NA 1982-83


guidance services 1.6 35 NA 1982-83


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 4,170 14 2,361 24 1982-83 -43.4

Number of FTE teachers 1,808 t. 1,024 15 1982-83 -43.4

Number of FIE aides 1,877 18 1,142 lb 1982-83 -39.2


Title L/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 17.3 0 23.5 lb 1982-83 35.8

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $543 28 tbJ2 lb 1982-83 10.4

Instructional settings: Pullouts do not predominate

in Ms and the SEA does not encourage or discourage

them

them 1984-85

Schoolvide projects: Nnt available 1984-65

160117

Minnesota I Continued )

1.979-8U :lost g.cent bar

AMO4nt .ink Amimat AUK Year

Percent

change

State CL

N.e*Aa Jf opezating Las 4.10 14 431 !' 1982-43 -0.9

rverall average per pupil expenditure $2,JUO 19 $3,0J1 /. 1182-41 31.4

Overall average per pup..1 e!:penditute la adjusted

1379-X2 dollars 52.142 20 (.162-$:3 -2.S

Enrollment it artlic r.1.:Ieet ' and secTIda:y

ac Joh 778,05b 19 715,190 21 1.482-h3 -8.s.

Ornament in lour.1_ elpvo tory and secondary

schools d;,')bb lb !900-ds.

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 1.0. .:0 1:480 -,%

Elrollment in religiously affiliated .Iementary

and secondary schools 84,-)25 lb 1530-81

Pcent of nonpublic enrollment in religl, ty

affiliated schools

Total enrollment In elementary 44e setoroLary schools 843:0 420

1980-bi

1980-Ml

Per capita income $8,890 18 $1.1.219 1.1 19d4 48.7

[US tax capacity index 105 L7 91 24r 1962



P.L. 94-142 81,442 id 70,99U 20 1982-63 -5.5


P.L. 89-313 904 42 bb6 43 1982-43 -26.1


P.L. 94-142 and P.L, 89-313 combined 9.6 22 1980-81


proficient 0,4 lb 1980


Percent White 9).b b 1980

Percent Black 1.b 41 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 1.0 14 IWOPercent American Indian/iskimoiAlent 1.3 15 190


Percent of children aged 5-17 is poverty 9,5 48 1980

Distribution children in poverty across LEAs

Percent of Children


34.3 0 - 10

41.7 11 - 20

19.2 21 - JO

4.6 31 - 40

0.2 > 40

Percent poor children In State in LFA with Iarf, .t enrollment 10.1 Minneapolis Special

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 22.3 Minneapolis Special, Sr. Paul. Anoka !Coon Raptdsl,

ltobbinsdale {Nov llopol, Duluth

11128

Minnesota (continued)



01.7 program

Minimal competency testing



LW in Minnesota are required to develop an instructional plan that includes measurable learner

outcomes. They must also submit an annual report to the public containing student test results and a

school improvement plan for the following year. The State does not sponsor any effective schools

projects.

Teacher reforms

la December 1984, a Governor's commission recommended that districts should develop differentiated

career paths and that there should be prelicensing testing for prospective teachers.

129

162I03

Mississippi

1979-H0 Host Recent Year

monnt Ralik Amoont


Total allocation 674.281,685 14 161,521,521

total LEA grants 649,265,589 14 6)7,451.254

total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-89 dollars $44.390,754

6"786.187State .Administration set aside 0,897,757 14 WboitiLState administration set aside per operating LEA 17,2Z2 l3 $3,770

LEA child count for formula purposes 263.55J 13 118,116

Title I/Cha ter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 131.811 I; 114,385

Number of participants K-6 141,109 14 93,110

Number of porticlpants 7-12 30.704 in 10,015

Number of nonpublic participants 1,989 21 1.773

Percent of all nonpublic scialol students served

in Title I/Chapter 1 inn: avail: Lei 3.6

Number of public participants 129,982 13 112.012


Title 1/Chapter 1 27,U 1 /4.1

Percent of students receiving reading 79.6 28 7h.4

Percent of students receiving math 52.0 8 46.6

Percent of students receiving language arts 8.1 19 12.)


English- proficient I.) NA 0.2


services 48.5 2 44.4


guidance services 26.8 7 27.8

Title t/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 6,004 ILI 4,321

Number of FTE aides 1:91

Number of FTE teachers 2,i19 li

741,9302,841 V

7 IZ4Number of FTE administrative staff 1b11

Title I/Chapter i pupli/staff ratio 22.0 lb 2b.5

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 6525 31 6547



them

Rana Year

Percent

Change

lb 1944-85 -]7.2

10 1984-4) -11.1

14 Illit-83 -33./

lb 1944-65 -.42.o

lb 1944-4) -47.5

20 1964-85 -47.8

15 1944-4) -32.4

14 1982-41 -13.2

Li 1988 -43 -7.5

12 194Z-83 -32.0

19 1982-83 -1.1

24 1980-81

13 1942-43 -13.3

1 1981 -83 --

39 1981-83

11 1481 -81 --

13 1982-83

24 1982-83

1 1982-83

9 1982-83

10 i982-83 -28.0

lb 194'1 -83194'1 -83 -44.8

9 1982-83 -32.2

7 1981-6.1 -26.2

26 1982-83 20.5

38 1982-0 4.2

1984-85

Schooluide prnjeets: one reported by SEA A84-85

Mississippi continue


Amount lOok Amount R3nit


Number of operating LEAs 152 32 13 32



1979-80 dollars

$1,482 '9 S1,1114

$1,250

51

51


schools 482,039 JO 468,2t14 3U


schools 50,1Lb 20

Percent of total enrollment In nonpublic schools 9.5 22

Enrollment In religiously affiliated elementary

and secondary schools 19.780 34


affiliated schools 34,5 51

Total enrollment in elementary and seminary scnnols 527,175 30

Per capita income $6,102 51 i8,857 51

RfS tax capacity index 70 51 71 51



P.L. 94-142 4,117 JU 49,515 29


P.L. 09-313 1,31.1 J) 1,304 35

Petcent of total school enrollment served by

P.L, 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 8.8 33

Percent of children aged 5-17 limIted-English-

ptoficient 0.2 0School enrollment by race

Percent White 55.8 49

Percent Black 43.4 2

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 0.J 47

Percent American indianhakimo/Aleut 0.J 29

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 1. 2 37

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty .30.4 1


Percent of Children


0 0 - 10

17.9 11 20

26.5 21 30

29.1 31 - 40

26.5 40

Percent

iq4r Change

1982-8J 0.7

LqUZ-6 13J 14.

L981 -83 -15.2

118I-63 -2.9

1:11

1980-81

1980-81

1980-81.

45.1

11.Z

1982-8J 20.4

1982-8J 4.2

1980-81

1980

1980

1980

1980

19988tiU

1980

Percent poor children In State in LEA with largest enrollment 0.0 Jackson

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAS 12.7 Jackgqn, De:ieto County (Hernando), nankin County

Brandon), Harrison County tGuifport/. Greenville

Min

r

Mississippi (continued)



No program







Each school district in Mississippi was required to have a management plan by 1984. Special SEA

monitoring units will be evaluating school districts in 1985; district accreditation is contingent an

compliance with this mandate. A reading aid program for grades 1-3 was established under the

Mississippi Education Reform Act of 1482. There are no State-sponsored effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

No statewide career ladder or merit pay program has been instituted in Mississippi. For initial

certification, new teachers must be evaluated in basic skills, knowledge, and classroom performance

beginning in 1986.

1f8

132 167

title 1/Chapter 1 Allocation 0=

Total allocation

Total LEA grants


State administratinn set aside



Title I/Chaeler 1 Participation Data




Numbet of nonpublic participants*/


in late 1 /Chapter il!/


Percent of all public school students!

Title 1/Chapter 1

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

English- proficient

Percent of students

services

Percent of students

guidance services

served

served in

tetelvieg reading

receiving math


receiving Engtish for limited-




Number of Title I/Chaprer 1 FTE staff members

Number of FTE teachers

Number of FIE aides


Title I/Chaptet i pupil/staff ratio

Title I/Chapter I average per pupil expenditure

Instructional settings: Pullouts predominare in


Schoolvide projects: None reported by SEA

MISSOURI


Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Ammon !tank iear

351,913,054 20 451,69b,872 2U 1984-63

669,403,432 2U 548,214,714 21) 1984-65 -L.1

$34,80,780 2U 1982-61 -/9.4

613,411,241 20 1984-d) -32.1

6796,744 20 $484,443 20 1964-65 -39.2

$1,438 41 8684 44 1984-65 -33.5

178,774 19 118,451 2U 1984-65

67,408 2U 65.949 18 1962-61 -1.7

67,44 2U 0,140 19 1981-61 2.4

19,124 18 15,677 lb 1982-63 -16.9

191 45 20 44 1982-83 15.4

(not available,

67,216 20

0.2

85,669

50

18

19150-41

1981 -o3 -1.21

1U.0 24 10.7 11 1982-63

44 66.5 47 1982-di

35.5 21 3b.4 22 1982-63

14.1 14 6.9 18 1961-63

0.1 25 0.2 24 1982-83

3.4 23 NA 1982-83 - _

0.9 36 NA 1982-61

3,117 23 21 1982-81 -11.3

4,188 14 11 1982-43 -10.4

955 28 426 27 1982-43 -J4.5

28 14 12 29.5T 1962-43 14.3

26.4 38 29.9 31 1982-63 13.3

5565 21 17 1982-63 -3.0

I964-o5

1984-0

* By-pass state In which independent contractots provide serv1ees to nonpublic school students.

1f8

Missouri (continued)


AmnInt kink Amnunt RACK Year

Percent

filanee


Number of operating LEAs 554 11 548 11 1982-83 -1.1

Overall average per pupil expenditure 11,897 29 12.394 38 1982-di lb.L


1979-80 dollars 11,771 38 1982-83 -0.6


schools 872,933 15 802,535 lb 1982-83 -8.1


schools 126,319 13 1180-81.



and secondary schools 117,4b2 12 1980-81


affiliated schools 93.0 8 1980-di


Per capita income 18,242 30 512,129 29 47.2

RTS tat capacity index 97 30 91 34 ft



P.L. 94-142 94,820 13 96,992 15 1982-83 2.3


P.L. 89-313 3,314 20 2,992 23.5r 1962-83 -9.7


F.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 10.4 14 19E10-81





Percent Hack 13.5 19 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific islander U.S 31 198U


Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 1,4 33 198U

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 14.0 24.5T 1980

Distribution of children in poverty across Las

Percent of Children


24.9 0 - 10

41.7 11 - 20

22.9 21 - 30

8,0 31 - 40

2.6 > 40

Percent poor children in State In LEA with largest enrollment 20.1 St. Lonig City

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 32.5 St. Louis City, Kansas City, Parkway (Chesterfield).

Hazelwood, Springfield

1F9134

Missouri (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: 8+




Under the Instructional Management System (IMS), Missouri is in the process of bringing effective

teaching research and methods to all schools in the State. implementing iMS is a district

responsibility with technical assistance from the SEA.

Teacher reforms

170

A career ladder program is a major priority of the new Governor and the legislature but a funding source

must be found. Teacher candidates for high school certification must be tested in their subject areas.

135

171

MONTANA

1919-00 Most Recent iesr

Percent


Tirle 1/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $10,-47,929 40 S10,625,400 41 1964-85 -1.6

Total LEA grants $9,195,012 41 $9,643,510 41 1964-85 4.9


S6,08,377 41 1984-85 -17.4

State administration Bet dame 1125,000 44.5f $225,000 43.)f 19R4-05 U

State administration set aside per operating LEA $403 50 i401 50 1984-85 -0.5

LEA child count for !ormula purposes 25,910 44 21,749 44 1984-85 -lo.1


Toral number of participants 12.991 44 11,577 43 1981-83 -10.9

Number of participants IL-6 7,017 48 b,s2b 45 1982-83 -5.6


Number of nonpublic participants 434 4U 441 38 1981-83 1.8


in Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 5.9 10 1980-81

Number of public participants 12,557 44 11,1.15 43 1982-83 -11.3

Percent of all public school students setved In

Title 1/Chapter 1 7.9 37 7.3 36 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 84.1 16 b7.9 4o 1982-83

Percent of students receiving math 32.4 31 42.2 14 19d2-83



English-proficient 0 NA 0 NA 1982 -B3


services 2.3 25 0 NA 1982-83


guidance services 12.4 2: 5.2 29 1982-83


Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 712 42 502 42 1982-83 -35.0

Number of FTE teachers 321 4U 253 40 1982 -8J -21.1

Number of FTE aides 401, 38 230 41 1982-83 -43.3

Number of FTE administrative staff 20 37 h 43 1982-3J -70.0

Title 1/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 16.8 5 23.1 14 1962-33 37.5

Title I/Chapter i average per pupil expenditure $708 B V48 11 1982 -83 5.b



them 1904-05

SchooIwide projects: None reported by StA 1984-85

172

136

Montana (continued)


Amount Rank Amount Rank YeaPercent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 548 10 581 10 1962-di 0.$

Ovetail average per pupil expenditure $2.367 lb 0,2/4 13 1982-133 ibaOverall average per pupil expenditure in adjusted

1979-80 dollars $2,385 L3 1962-83 0.6

Enrollment 10 public elementary and secondary

schools 158,208 42 152,335 42 1962-83 -3.7

Enrollment in noopublic elementary and eecondary

schools 7,o6).3 45 196U-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 4.7 4J 1980-81


and secondary schools . 6,743 45 1960-81


affiliated schools 67.9 lb 1960-61

Total enrollment In elemeotnry and secondary schools 162,861 43 198U-81


RIS tax capacity index 113 b 11U 15 1182


Number of handicapped children served undet

P.L. 94-142 12,284 41 14,782 41 1982-83 20.3

Number of handieapped children served under

P.L. 89-313 497 50 43J 49 1982-83 -12.9

Petceut of total echool enrollment served by

P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 8.2 31 1980 -31

Petcent of children aged 5-17 limited-English-






Percent Americas Ind/ea/Eskimo/Aleut 7.0 6 1980


Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 12.7 JU 1980

Distribution of children In poverty /woos LEAs

Percent of Children


33.634.013.79.09.7

0 -1011 - 2U

21 - 30

31 4U

> 40

Percent pont children in State In LEA with largest enrollment

Percent pour children in State in 5 largest LEAs

1713

4.1 Billings High 02

17.4 Billings High 02, Billings Elementary 02, Great

Falls High RA, Great Falls ilementary 01, Missoula

County High

17,1

Montana (continued)



No program




Montana does not have a district or school planning requirement. in cooperation with the Northwest

Regional Education Laboratory, the State piloted an effective schools project focusing on principal

effectiveneN.

Teacher reforms

A statewide career ladder or merit pay program has not been repornd. The Chief State School Officer

has proposed that new teachers be required to pass a precertifiation test.

138

175

NEBRASKA

Title E/Chapter 1 Allocation nate

Total allocation

To1m1 LEA grants





Title riChapter 1 Participation Data


Number of participants K76Number of participants 7-12

Number of nonpublic participanis


in Title I/Chapter 1



Title 1/Chapter 1

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

English-proficient

Percent of students

services

Percent of studentsguidance services

receiving

receiving

receiving

served

served in

reading

math

language arts




Title I/Chapter 1 Primps Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 Fa staff members

Number of FTE teachersNumber of FIE aides

Number of PTE administrative staff


Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil espendlture


LEAS although SEA does not encourage or discourage

them

Schoolwide projects: one teported by SEA

1979-80 Most Recent 'ear

Percent

ChangeAmount SAnk Amount Rank Year

$16.665,965 37 $16,430,522 37 1986-65 -1.5

$15,6/7,09 47 115,680,115 in 1964-65 < U.1

$10,216,J39 3b 1962-83 -33.6

$10,720,456 36 1984-65 -10.1

5146,591 37 $225,000 43.5f 1984-15 -6.6

$238 51 3132 51 1984-65 -2.5

44,605 36 31,704 31, 1984 -d) -21.1

29,106 36 11,412 3/ 1982-83 -26.4

21,072 137 17,647 37 1962-83

7,421 34 3,583 37.5f 1981-111 -52.6

2,905 18 2,U4o 17 1982-43 -29.6

(not available) b.6 7 1960-61

26,201 36 19,J60 37 1982-83 -2b.1

9.1 31 7.2 37 1982-03

76.4 34 63.2 14 1982-63

34.0 25 39.2 17 1982-63

J./ 32 NA 1982-84

0 NA -- NA 1962-03

0 NA -- NA 1982-83

0 NA . NA 1982-6;

1,218 37 37 1982-83 -31-4

672 33 567 36 1982-83 -24,6

424 37 299 39 1982-83 -29.5

36 33 16 36 1962-63 -50.0

23.9 20 25.6 23 1982-83

$532 30 $649 24 1981-63 22,0

1984-65

1964-65

176,3,

Nebraska (continued)

L979-80 Most Recent tear

Amount Rank Amount Rano( Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 1,035 2 9t8 4 1982-83 -b.5

Overall average per pupil expenditure ii,O61 24 S4,120 24 082-63 41.)


1919-80 dollars $2,160 24 1982-Cl 4.7


schools 287,288 36 269,019 36 1982-83 -144


schools 38,574 19 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment lo nonpublic schools 12.I 14 198U-131


and secondary schools 37,2U7 25 1980-81


affiliated schools 9b.5 2 1980-81

total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 319,004 36 198U-81

Per capita income $8,4b4 26 $12.13 28 1904 45.1

RTS tax capacity index 100 lot 97 46 1982



° L. 94-142 49,836 3b 30,023 _lb 1982-83 0.4

"umber of handicapped children served under

P.L. 89-313 550 48 425 50 1982-83 -t2.7


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 9.b 21 19E1G-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-tnelish-




Percent Black 4.1 32 i9d0

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 0.5 - 1980

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut U.9 19 1380


Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 11.6 37 L980


Percent of Children


35.5 0 - 10

27.0 11 - 20

17.9 21 - 30

10.2 31 - 40

9.3 j 40


Percent poor children in State in S largest LEAs

1 7 74u

22.3 Omaha

30.6 Omaha, Lincoln. Millard, Papilliou, Westskde

Community Wmaua)

Nebraska (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: 5+


First graduating ciass assessed: not available


Nebraska has no requirement for district or school planning nor does it have any Statesponsored


Teacher reforms

h career ladder has ! ,n established with salary increases based on experience and preparation.

Education program canuldates must pass a basic skills exam; teacher candidates must pass a

precertification exam in their subject area.

141

178

17

NEVADA

.11,,..1979-80 Most Recent fear

Percent

Chaim'Amount Rank AMOURt Rank Year

Title I/Lhapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation 14.912,245 51 113,773,16o 50 1936-6j 31.b

Total LEA grants 59.171.597 51 S5,521.310 49 1964-85 4b.4

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars 33.111014 69 1982-43 -16.9

001230119 49 1964-63 1.4

State administration set aside $225,990 44.5r 6225,000 43.51 1984-d5 0

State administration set aside per operating LEA $13,235 7 113.235 b 1964-8) 0

LEA child count for formula purposes 11,494 )O 14,46/ 411 1984-45 19.3

Title 1 /Chapter 1 Partici ation Data


Number of participants K-6Number of participants 1-11

5,978

3,547

2,431

49

50

4e 7j3,°j:115

49

49

30

1982-83

1.982di

1942-83 481.5f

Number of nonpublic participants 87 0.51 ni JO 1942-81 -29.4


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not avillablei 10.,'J 44 3980-41

Number of pub participants 5,891 49 49 1941-43 19.2


Title 1/Chapter 1 4.0 51 4.1 49 1982-8J

Percent of students receiving reading 83.1. 20 /8.d 51 1942-43

Percent of students receiving math 55.8 b 51.9 6 1982-83

Percent of students receiving language arts 2.3 Jo 8.4 10 J942-83


English-proficient 0 NA 0.9 18 1982-83


services 0 NA 0.2 Z4 1982-8.1


guidance services U NA I.0 14 1982-8J


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTL: staff members 241 50 192 49 1982-83 -10.3

Number of FIE teachers 9e 50 79 50 1942-83 -17.1


Number of FTE administrative staff 48 2 49 1902-di -33.3

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 24.8 32 3n.9 48 i982-83 48,8


instructional settings: Pullouts predominate in

56.11 14 096 27 1982-83 -5.2

LEAs although SEA (Ives not encourage or discourage

them 1944-85

Scboolaide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-85

150142

Nevada (continued)


Amount Rank Amount Oanic Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating Ws 11 48 V 49 1942-8J 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure t2,1132 25 t2082 J4 1984-83 27.1


1979-80 dollars 41.910 14 1982-83 -0.0


schools 141,134 44 151,1u4 43 1982-83 2.3


schools IN 599 47 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 4,2 44 1900-61


and secondary schools 5,b55 4b 1900-81


afflliared schools 05.1 20 1901.1-81

Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 156,1100 44 190-d1

Per capita income $9,929 5 313,21b 14 1984 33.1

KB tax capacity index 154 3 151 3 1982


Number of hAadicapped children served under

P.L. 94-142 10,830 43 12,701 42 1982 -83 11.3


P.L. 89-313 377 51 619 44 1981-83 44.2




prnticient 1.0 15 1980

Si . enrollment by race




Percent American indlau&skimu/Aleut

1.9

2.3

4

9 1998800




Percent of Children

Percent of Districts it Poverty

29.4 0 10

64,7 11 - 20

0 21 -3O5.9 31 4U

0 > 40

Percent poor children In State in LKA with largest enrollment u4.8 Clark County (Las Vegas)

Percent poor children in State in 5 Largest LEAs 85.9 Clark County (Las Vegas), Waskoe County tdenol,

Carson aty, Elko. Unugias County (Ninden)

181 163

Nevada (continued)

Other State programs


No program

Minimum competency test




First graduating class assessed: lAZ


The SEA is designing workshops to disseminate effective schools concepts to local educators. The State

does not have a district or school planning requirement,

Teacher reforms

A statewide career ladder or merit pay program has not been reported. A competency test is required for

certification.

144

1 P 2

1P

Mg HAMPSHIRE

1919-40 Most Keeent Year

Percent

ChaupeAmount dans Amnont dans Year

Rae I/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $5.661.7-13 0 $8.121,514 49 1984-85 43.6

Total LEA grants P40110.05 49 56,417.980 47 1984-85 44.1

fntal LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $3.337,177 48 1/82-81 -17.1

$4.728,518 47 1984-W

State administration set aside $225,000 44.51 $225.000 43.)1' 1984-85

State administration set aside per operating LEA $1,433 42 37 1964-85 -0.6

LEA child count for formula purposes 15.340 41 %,42111; 46 1984-85 18.7


Total number of participants 8.334 48 7,876 48 1982-83 -5.5

Number of participants K-6 1,277 47 5,484 46 i982 -8J -1U.9

Number of participants 7-12 962 50 1,178 47 1987-83 32.8

Number of nonpublic participants 479 39 395 39 1962-83 -17.5


In Title I/Chapter 1 {not available} 2.5 33 1980-81 --

Number of public participants 7,855 48 7,481 0! 1982-0 -4.d

Percent of all public schooi students served in

Title 1/Chapter 1 4.8 50 4.7 48 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 78.0 31 80.8 19 19n2-133




Engilsh-proficient U.4 23 3.1 2n 1982-83


services U NA U NA 1982-83


guidance services 0,3 42 3.3 26 1982-83


Number of Title I/L :pter 1 FTE sraff members 592 44 404 45 1982 -83 -31.8

Number of FTE teachers 149 47 118 46 1982-83 -2U.8

Number of FTE aides 118 42 214 43 1982-8J -J2.2

Number of ra administrative staff 45 21 26 33 1182-83 -42.2

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 14,1 1 19.5 4 1982-83 38.3

Title //Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $550 24 073 33 1982-83 4.1

Instructional nettings: Pullouts predominate in


Schoolwide projects: Not available 1984-85

IR 4

New Aampshire (continued)

1979-80 Most Recent leer

Percent

ChangeAmonet ithak Award Rank Year

State Charactetistics

Number of operating LEAs 157 il 114 31 1982-43 0.6

Overall average per pupil expenditure 11,t136 34 $2.702 29 1962-03 47.2


1979-80 dollars 11,999 19 1981 -83 8.4


sr ols 110.546 40 100,197 41 19H2-83 -1).1

Enrol-ment in nonpublic elementary and seconder

schools 111,141 37 1980-81





affiliated schools 71.6 39 19dU-81


Per capita income S8.155 /9 311,148 15 1984 39.3

RTS tax capacity index 96 31 IOU 21.51 1982



P.L. 94-142 8,957 48 12,014 44 1982-03 34.B


P.L. 89-313 3,670 11 1,069 29 1982 -83 -43.6


P.L. 94-142 and F.L. 89-313 combined 6.7 49 1980-81

Percent of children aged 5 -11 limited-English-


School enrollment by tare


Percent Black U.S 45 1980


Percent American ledian/Eskicanleut 0.1 47 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin U.? 41 IMOPercent of children aged 5-11 in poverty 8.9 50 1980


Percent of Children


56.5 0 - 10

38.8 11 211

4./ 21 - 30

0.6 31 - 40U > 40

Percent poor children in State In LEA with largest enrollment 11.2 Manchester

Percent p ,r children in State in 5 Largest LEAK 25.6 Manchester, Nashua. Salem, Portsmouth, Concord

P.'

1 6 17...

146

Hew Hampshire (continued)



No program



Crades assessed: elementary, middle, and high school; many LEAs test in 4, B, 12

Expected uses: grade promotion (at local option), high school graduation (at local option)



Most LEAs in New Hampshire develop a management plan based on assessment results. The SEA is holding

regional awareness conferences to link effective schools research to the development of the management

plans.

Teacher reforms

1P6

A mentor teacher program is under consideration in the legislature. Effective December 1985, new

teachers must pass a skills test for certification.

141

1R7

NEW JERSEY

1979-80 dos: Recent fear

Percent

',hangsAmount Rank Amulet ItliTIK fear


Total allocation $03,2d1,840 11 $107,517,686 9 1984-45 29.1

total LEA grants 04,933,401 12 599,222439 9 1984-d5 36.0

Total LEA grants in adjunted 1979-80 dollars 354,829,442 11 1982-83 -24.8

$68.71.1,462 9 1984-85 -5.8

State administration set aside 51,230,765 12 31,008,1.14 9 1984-85 -18.1

Stare administration set aside per operating I,FA $2.093 ii 31.734 34 1984-85 -17.

LEA child count for formula purposes 140,155 18 209,88.1 II 1984-d5 18.1


Total number of participants 121,379 15 169.046 5 1982-di 39.3

Number of participants K-6 97,627 15 10,422 9 1982-83 9.0

Number of participants 7-12 20,524 17 40,231 b 1982-83 96.0

Number of nonpublic participants 12,454 4 10,956 4 182-83 -12.0

Percent of all nonpublic school studelts served

in Title I/Chapter 1 not available? 5.4 12 1980-81

Number of public participants 108,925 17 158,890 5 1992-dJ 45.1


Title i/Chapter 1 8.5 34 13.5 8 1982-63

Percent of students receiving readinp 60.3 45 68.2 45 1982-83


Percent of students receiving language arts 1.2.4 11 HA 1982-83




services 6.0 20 2.0 17 1982-83

Percent of stud its receiving attendance and


Title I/Ch4pter 1 Program Characteristics*

Number of Title I /Cl 'ter 1 FTE staff members 4,985 16 4,088 11 1981-82 -18.0

Number of FTE teachers 2,673 8 2,410 9 1981 -9.8

Number of FTE aides 1,410 21 1,183 15 1981-o, -16.1

Number of FIE administrative staff 205 6 Igo 4 1981-82 0.5


Title 1 /Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

instructional settings: Pullouts do not predominate

in LEAs and the SEA does not encourage or discouras

them

them

$601 17 $439 47 1984-83

1984-85

-27.0


ED dnes not have TIERS staftine data from Neu Jersey for 1982-83.

been used as estimates.

188148

therefore, 1981-82 data have

.ew ersey cont.nueL.

1419-8U Most Reeent YeLr

Amount Rank Amount Ram Year

Percent

Change



Overall average per pupil expenditure $3,093 3 $3,945 5 1984-83 17.5

Overall average per pupil expenditure In adiested

1979-80 dollars $2,918 5 1982-83 -5.7

Enrollment in public elementary and 4econdary

schools 1,287,P09 9 1,172,510 9 1982-83 -9.0


schools 229,818 0 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 15.o 9 1980-81

Enrolment lu religiously affiliated elementary

and secondary schools 206,415 b 1960-81



Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 1,475,885 9 1980-81

Per capita income $9,706 8 $1.5,241 4 1984 )7.4

RI'S tax capaeity index 1UL Li 100 lb.)f 1912



P.L. 94-142 141,994 8 157,016 7 104-0 10.6


P.L. 09-313 1,584 8 4,4b5 IL 1932-83 -41.1


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 10.7 7 198C-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 Ilmited-English-




Percent Black 16.3 lb 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 1.6 4 I98U

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.1 '.5 198U




Percent of Children

Percent of Districts !n Poverty

67.9 0 - 10

23.7 11 - ZU

5.9 21 - 3U

2.1 31 - 40

0.5 > 4U

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 16.5 Newark

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 34.7 Newark, Jersey City, Pltorson, Freehold Regional.

Camden City

189149

New Jersey (continued)



Allocations

1979-80 168.3 million

1984-85 tatu million

1984-85 allocation In adjusted 1979-80 dollars $60.9 million


r9-80

1c84-85

82.0%

81.9X

Funding approach: number of eligible students, multiplied by the additional cost factor (.16) for SCE,

multiplied by the State average net current expense budget per pupil; eligible students are those

receiving AFDC and those below stadndard on the Minimum Basic Skills Test and/or those in an approved

SCE program of the prior year.

Targeting approach! students in grades K-11 who score below equivalent statewide standards in reading

and math,

Number of students served:

1919 -80 340,501

1983-84 172,146






150

New Jersey (continued)


Districts are required to define needs and set objectives for meeting those needs through an annual

planning process. New Jersey has some Statesponsored effective schools projects.

reacher reforms

A master teacher pilot program was approved for the 1985-86 school year. Awards of $5,0110 are to be

made to the top five percent of teachers in ten districts. The tethers union is opposed to the program,

so only two districts have agreed to participate. The State does not require testing For initial

certification.

IP2151 V13

AN MEXICO

1979-8U Host Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount Nank Amount dank 'bar

/Me 1/Chapter I Allocation Data

Total allocation $26,642,296 34 $28,222,226 33 1984-85 8.4

Total LEA grants C22,676019 34 $25,409,911 34 1984-45 12.1

Total LEA grants lo adjusted 1979-HO dollars



LEA child count for Formula purposes

$484,868$4,373

81,698

34

11

ill

$15,991,155

$17,596,891

ST2,5975.1

64,891

33

34

33

24

32

19d2-83

1984-8o

1984-85

1981 -85

19848

-29.5

-11.4

-31,1

-JIM-10.4



dumber of participants K-6 22,729 35 20,343 35 1962-83 -10.)

Number of participants 7-12 9,589 ilf 7,294 30 1982-83 -23.9

Number of nonpublic participants . 1,373 2.3 1,241 21 1982-di -9.4


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 7.3 2 148U-81

Number of public participants 31,812 35 26,414 35 1982-83 -14.d


Title I/Chapter 1 11.3 18 9.8 18 1982-83



Percent of students receiving language arts 30.3 J 37.0 2 1982-64




services 8.9 18 26.7 5 1982-83

Percent of studetxs receiving attendance and

guidance services 24,8 9 13.2 13 1982-83



Number of FTE teachers 662 34 553 32 1982-83 -18.5


Number of FTE adminiC.rative staff7 44.5T 9 42 1982-83 28.0

Title 1/Chapter I pupil/staff ratio 19.3 9 21.2 9 1482-83 9.8

fltle 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $780 10 $782 9 1182-83 11.7



Schoolwide projects; None reported by SEA 1984-d5

194152

Dew Mexico (continued)

197Y-80 Most Kecent fear

Percent

LhangeAmount 'Rank Amnunt Rank felt.


Number of operating LEAR H8 49 49 34 1982-84 1.1

Overall average per pupil expenditure 11, 921 17 12,803 25 1)82-84 45.9

Overall average per pupil expenditure in Adjusted

1979-80 dollars$2,073 25 1962-84 7.9


schools 2;5,57.: 31 68,832 17 1962-83 -2.5

Enrollment in nonpublic elementary and secendory

schools18,027 39 1960-31

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools6,2 18 1360-81


and secondary schools12,854 40 1980-81


affiliated schools71.4 411 1980-31


Per capita income $7.207 41 $10,330 43 19d4 43.3

ars tax capacity Index Lui 21r 115 1.1.)i 1982


Humber of handicapped children served under

P.L. 94 142 19,974 38 25,431 37 1982-84 21.4


P.L. 89-313 505 49 504 46 1982-83 -0.4


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined8.3 38 1920-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 ilmted-nglish-

proficient4,1 1 1980


Percent Vitae71.7 42 1980

Percent Hack2.0 36 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific IslanderU.5 34 1980

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 10.32 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin43.9 1 1960

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty21.7 b 198U


Percent of Children


7.9

30.3

27.0

21.4

13.5

0 10

- 20

21 - JO

41 - 4U

2> 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 21.9 Albnquerve

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LF.,4843.4 Aibniuerquo, Us Cruces, I;allup, Santa Fe, Roswell

195

New Mexico (continued)

Other State Proem!


No program



Grades assessed: 10-12 (at local option)




Districts are required to develop program plans, including curriculum development. The State does not

sponsor any effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The legislature is considering a pilot project on merit pay. Prospective teachers must pass the

National Teacher Examination for certification. Education schools must give a basic skills admissions

test. A pilot, nottraditional certification program for liberal arts majors has been approved.

154

196

197

NEW YORK

NoHt Recent Year

Amonnt Rink AMOURS. Rank Year

Percent

Chinge

tale 1/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $102,610,995 1914-85 16.1

Total LEA grants $2713,154,892 1 /315,746,511 1 1914-85 14.4

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars 31110,898,846 1 1982-83 -J4.5

$218061,U19 1 1984-85 -211.8

State administration set aside 14,473,1158 1 $3,295,231 2 198 -85 -26.3

State administration set aside per operating 1.1A 36.247 16 14,601 14 1984-85 -26.2

LEA child count for formula purposes 6/8,441 2 02,781.1 2 19d4-05 -0.8




Number of participants 7-12 108,130 9/,J93 2 1982-83 -9.9

Number of nonpublic participants 26,816 1 j709U 1982-83 40,2

Percent of all nonpublic schnoi students served

in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 9.6 1 198U-81

iumber of public participants 320,885 3 261,062 3 1982-8J -18.6


Title 1/Chapter 1 10.8 21 9.6 20 1982-83

Percent of students receiving mailing 83.5 16 72.4 40 1982-83

Percent of students receiving math 3b.2 _15,) 24 1982-83

Percent of students receiving Langone arts 4.J 6 16.1 9 1912-83




services U.5 35 NA 1982-83

Percent students receiving attendance and

guidance services 9.9 27 - - NA 1982-83


Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 15,722 2 9,219 4 1982-83 -41.4

Number of FTE teachers 6,485 1 4,177 2 1982-8J -35.6

Number of FTE aides 8,220 2 748 25 1982 -83 -90.9


Title I/Chapter i pupil/staff ratio 22.1 10 32.4 38 1982-83 46.b

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $794 4 1119 b 1982 -83 3.1



them 1984-8)

Schoolvide projects: Not available 1984-85

198

155

New York (continued)

1971,410 Most Recent Year


Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 71h ) 715 5 1982-83 -0.1

Overall average per pupil expenditure 13.304 2 $4013 2 1982-6.3 33.4

Overall average por pupil expenditure In adjusted

1971 -80 dollars $3,382 2 1982-83 2,4


schools 2,969,214 2 2,716,478 3 1982-63 -8.4


schools 519,670 l 1940-81

Percent of Mai enrollment in nonpublic schools 0.6 (2 1980-01


and secondary schools 50,97o l 1980-61



fatal enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 3,450,04 2 1980-01

Per capita income 59,177 12 414,121 7 1984 53,9

Rf5 tax capacity index 81 J9 92 321 1962



P.L. 94-142 197,863 4 234,314 3 1981-83 18,4


P.L. 89-313 20.724 2 3U,511 2 1981-83 47.3


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined b,7 4B 198U -81

Percept of children aged 5-11 limited-English-

proficient 2.0 5 19oU


Percent White 75.b 38 1940



Percent hmexican Indianaskimo/Alcut 0.3 31 1980




Percent of Children


48.5

38.5

12.3

0.7

U - 10

11 Ill

2i - 30

31 - 4U

4U

Porrent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 62.4 New fork City

Percent poor children In State in 5 largest LEAs 49.1 Aft, York City, Ourfato City, Rochester, Yonkers,

Syracuse




Allocations

1979-80 $136.9 million

1984-85 $111.6 million (estimate)



1979-80 45.2%

1984-85 50.5%

Funding approach: in the State's basic aid formula, students scoring below minimal competence level on

State assessments receive an additional weighting of .25; LEA allocations are based on the total number

of students failing the test between 1977-78 and 1980-81 divided by the total number taking the test in

those years; funds "attributable" to special needs students must be spent on programs for these students.

Targeting approach: LEAs identify participants on the basis of standardized tests.


1979-80 478,012

1983-84 160,113


2^0


Grades assessed: 3, 5, 6, 8-12

Expected uses: high school graduation remediation


157

21



New York has established a Resource Allocation Plan which identifies the resources needed by schools in

the State and coordinates the delivery of Federal, State, local, and regional resources to them. The

State has a planning requirement but does not sponsor any effective schools projects,

Teacher reforms

The legislature is considering master teacher and career ladder proposals. New teachers must pass a

test for certification.

i58

2 2

NORTH CAROLINA


Total allocation

Total LEA grants



State administration set aside per operating 1.I..A




Numbet of participants K-6




Amount Rank Amount Rank

$934181,0h2 9 $80,115.700 LJ

182,480,578 9 $71,5.0,1300 12

555,035.106 9

160,230,051 12

11,377.060 V 6751,001 13

39,5h1

317 , 10

8

o

35 ,252

22L0J9

10

LI

149,547 11 133,881 10

IIII.019 L3 67,001 11

31,146 8 46,111 4

726 J6 517 .16

Percent

Year Change

1984-65 -14,0

11E14-85 -12.1

19112-81 -31.5

1164-65 -J1.1.

084-65 -45.5

1184-65 -45.1

1484-85 -10.J

1982-63 -10.5

19t12-8.1 -20.4

1982-83 17.1

1982-8J -18.6


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 1.2 4b 1980-81



Title I/Chapter 1


Petceut of students receiving math



EngLish-proftclent


services


guidance services

Title 1/Chapter 1 Program Chatacteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter I FTE staff members

Nnmber of FTE teachers

Number of FTE aides


Title 1/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio

['Lae I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

Instructional settings: Pullouts do not preoominate

in LEAS and the SEA does not encourage or discourage

them

Schoolvide projects: None reported by SSA

204

148,821 11 143,372 9

12.9 13 11.2 10

67.o 9 81.3 17

19.1 4b 24.5 41

0.3 42 3.1 21

U NA 0.2 21

10.9 12 2.3 ib

21.9 13 4.8 22

6,478 7 3,865 13

2,617 7 1,412

3,Lbl 8 974 1:

122 14 99 13

23.1 23 34.6 4b

$552 25 5562 34

159

1182-0 -10.4

1962-63

1161-83

1962-8J

1962-83

19132-83

1982-83

1982-83

1981-63

1 1942-:.$3

1984-83

1982-63

1962-63

-40.3

-14.4

-09./

-18.9

49.8

i.8

1984-85

1964-65

North Carolina (continued)

1.919-110 MOgt tOennt Year

Amount Rank Amount Rank Ye 4r

Percent

Change

State Characteristics.111

Number of operating LEAs 144 34 143 .34 1982-63 -0.7

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1.h44 41 $2,o74 43 1902-63 Ab.2

Overall average per pupil :mpenditure in adjusted

1919-80 dollars 11.534 43 1982-83 -6.1


schools 1,150,053 10 1.U96.815 10 1982-8J -4,6


schools 58,070 23 198U-41

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 4.9 41 196U-61


and secondary schools 33,47) iF, 1980-81

Percent of nonpublic enrollment in religiount,

affiliated schools 57.e 4e 1980-81

fatal enrollment In elementary and secondary schools 1,167,454 1U 198U-di

Per capita income 17,104 43 310,758 38 1984 51.4

RTS tar capacity index 41 44 HI 44.5f 1962



P.L. 94-142 109,b51 11 116,494 11 1982-83 o.1


P.L. 89-313 5,14J 13 4,292 13 19d2-83 -18.1






Percent White 7U.4 43 1980

Percent Black 27.b 7 1940


Percent American ludian/Eskico/kieut 1.5 14 1900


Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 17.8 L5 1980


Percent of Children


9.7 0.1042.4 11 - 20

34.7 21 3U

11.1 31 40

2.1 40

Percent poor children In State in LEA with largest enrollment

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LfAs

IM=11,2145

5.4 Mecklenburg Charlotte

11.b Mecklenburg Charlotte, Wake County (daleigh),

Forsyth Winston Salem, Cumberland County

(layettevt11(9, Uaston Coouty 16astonia/

\


ether State Programs


Allocations

1979-60 4.0 million

1964-85 $8.8 million



1979-80 6.6%

1984-85 11.0%

Funding approach: formula based on number of ilth graders falling State competency test and severity of

their failure.

Targeting approach: students failing State competency test (required for diploma) and 9th and iUth

graders identified as potential failures.


1979-80

1984-85


206

not available

121,039


Grades assessed: 11; grades 1-3, 6, 9 are given a standardized achievement test which is used as a

diagnostic tool by LEAs



161

2;17



North Carolina does not have a requirement for district or school planning and the State does not

sponsor effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The State Board has developed a career ladder plan for teachers and administrators, It will he pilot

tested in 16 districts in 1985 -8b with a possible extension for a second year before it is fully

implemented. The plan must be approved 'y the legislature. Two sections of the National Teacher

Examination (NTE) must be passed for admission to teacher education programs. The entire $TE must be

passed for certification.

2(18 162

NORTH DAKOM

14114-0 Kmst Recent Year

Amnunt ti:fnk Amount Rang Year

Percent

change

fitle L/Ckapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation 14,17,40 46 $8,673,381 46 1984-85 -5.4

total LEA grants 67,851,353 44 $7,4b9,10J 4b 1944-45 -4.9

fatal LEA grants in adjusted 1974-8O dollars 15,157.175 45 1982-83 -34.J

0,172,550 4b 1984-45 -34.1

State administration set aside $115,000 44.5f $225,000 43.5T 1984-4) U

State administration set aside per operating LhA $743 49 1771 46 1984-85 3.8

LEA child count for formula purposes 28,1)05 42 18.105 41 1984-4) -15.4

Title i /Chapter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 10.139 47 18,440 44 1982-43 1.4

Number of participants K-b 7.993 45 8,821 42 1942-43 10.5

Number of participant,: 7-12 2,231 47 1,09 45 1982-43 -2b.3

Number of nonpublic participants Sib 38 518 .15 1942-83 -3.4

Percent of all runsublic school students served

in Title 1/Chapter 1 . (not available) 4.5 18 1980-41

Number of public participants 4,703 47 4.962 45 191/2-83 2.1

Percent of all public school students served fil

Title I/Chapter 1 8.2 J6 8.5 2b 1982-43



Percent of students receiving language arts 9.0 18 L0.3 15 1982-4.1


Engilsh-proficirnt 1.d 14 1.2 15 1902-83

Percent of students receiving health and nutation

services 0 HA -- VA 1982-8J


guidance services 0 NA _. (JA 1902-83


Number ofpritie 1/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 581 45 491 43 1902-U3 -15.5

Number (X FTE teachers 38b J7 330 36 1981-83 -14.5

Number of erE aides 187 47 156 44 1982-83 -16.b

Number of FTE administrative staff 44.5( 4 45 1902-83 -42.9

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 17.0 7 21,3 11 1982-83 21.0

Title !/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure Vol 5 $645 23 1982-83 -13.3

Instructional settings: Pullouts do not predominate

in LEAs and the SEA does not encourage or discourage

them 19134-85


210

North Dakota (continued)

1479-60 Iinet Rimmt Year

P-quoit

CnangeAmount Ronk Amount Rank Year


Number of operating LEAs 303 21 M 21 1182-8i -3.b

Overall average Per pupil expenditure tIth24 35 SL,i4u Lb 19111 -81 50.5


1979-80 dollars Szom bri 1982-83 11.3


schools 117,648 44 117,878 4b 1142-83 -U.5

Enrollment to nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools 1;!, b59 44 J980-81

Percent of total earnilment In nonpublic schools Mt4 lb 1qR0-81




affiliated schools 85.J 22 1980-81

Total enrollment lo elementary and secondary schools 117,544 4b 1988-b1

Per capita Income $8,017 31 512,441 1.4 1984 55.4

RIS tax c'pacIty index 109 1/I 115 11.5f 1962



P.L. 94-142 9,219 47 10,314 47 1942-43 11.9


P.L. 89-313 557 47 468 47 198L-63 -12.4






Percent lalte 94.2 9 1980

Percent Black 0.3 4b 1960

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 0.J 48 1960


Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 0.7 48 15''0

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 14.0 24.3T 1980

Distribution of children in poverty acrnss LEAs

Percent of Children


19.3 0 - 10

34,9 11 28

21.8 21 30

13.4 31 - 40

10.6 17> 40

Percent poor children In State in LEA with largest enrollment 3.3 Bismarck

Percent poor children In State in 5 largest LEAs 16.6 Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks. !Hoot, Handan

2111 64

I

4111MONorth Dakota (continued)



No program


Ito program established at the State level


All schools in North Dakota must meet minimum standards, but in order to be accredited with

commendation, they must develop a school improvement plan. The State does not sponsor any effective

schools projects.

Teacher reforms

212

No career ladder or merit pay programs have been reported. North Dakota does not require testing for

initial certification.

IMII=lv

165 213

I

fiiie I/C4apter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation

Iotai LEA grants



State administration let aside per operating LEA










Percent of all public school students served io

Title i/Chapter 1





English-proficient


services


guidance services


1979-80 !lost Recent Year

Amount R.ink AMnunt Rank

$96,477,532 8 $112,578,130 H

184,o09,910 8 S103,812,686 6

161.06,645 8

57I,d42,441 8

11,425,775 8 i1.05,387 8

32,31.8 31 Sidlb 33

247,110 11 281,557 7

144:54 12 119,640 11

130,915 6 110,930 6

8,796 )2 5,932 il

6,040 4 5,Ao b

(not available/ 2.9 28

138,214 12 114.124 11

6.8

Sii.o

10.3

0

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 5,2'14

Number of FIB teachers 3,679

Number of FIE aides 1,278

Number of FTE administrative staff 1.30

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 27.4

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure t5d7


LF.As although SEA does not encourage or discourage

them


21 4

lbb

46 6.1 10

8 49,D 3

49 9.5 49

NA NA

NA NA

36 1.2 19

39 5.1 21.

13 3,510 14

3 2,70 6

24 561 32

i/ iUl 1/

41 34.1 43

2U $690 2U

Percent

Year Change

1964-65

1984-85

1981-83

1984-85

1984-85

1984451964-85

1992-8J

1962-83

1982-bi

1982-4;

16.7

21.1

-27.8

-15.0

-!b.0

-26.0

-1,2

-17.1

-15.3

-32.6

-8.7

i98(1-81

1981-83 -17.4

1982-33

1482-63

1962-83

1964-83

1992-83

1992 -83

1982-83

1992-83 -33.3

1982-83 -26.4

1982-83 -54.3

1982-63 -2i.'

1981 -83 24.5

1982-33 17.5

1984-85

1934-85

able (continued)

1979-80 Most Recent ielr

Amount F.Ank Amount Rank fear

Percent

Change


615

S1,U07

2,025,250

7

26

5

015

$2,011

51,93o

1.860,245

268,357

11.1

1

33

31

5

5

15

1942-43

l9d2-8,1

I'2-63

1962-63

1960-81

1V60-81

U

311.o

-3.4

-6.1

Number of operating LEAs



1979-80 dollars


schools


schools

Percent of total enrollment In nonpublic schools


and secondary schools . 254,003 5 1940-61



Total enrollment lo elementary and secondary schools 2,125,L18 b 1980-81

Per capita income $8,072 22 111,314 26 1964 42,u

RTS tax capacity index LUI. 24 42 32f 1942



P.L. 94-142 168,393 5 192,114 5 1962-63 2.0


P.L.. 89-313 12,959 6 0,U20 7 1962-63 -12.7







Percent Black 11.8 ZU 1960

Percent Asian and Pacific islander 0.5 33

Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0.4 Z5 11:Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 1.5 32 1980

Percent of children aged 5-i7 in poverty 11.2 34 1960


Percent of Children


62.3 0 10

29.9 11 - 20

6.5 21 - 30

1.3 31 -400 1 40

Percent pour children In State In LEA with largest enrollment 11.3 Cleveland

Percent poor children in State in S Isrgost LEAS 3).2 Clpveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, rolpdo, Akron

2 5167

Ohio (continued)

Other State Progsams


Allocations

1919 -80

1984-85

1984-85 allocation In adjusted 1979-60 dollars

1 SCE funds as a proportion of federal funds

1979-60 59.11

1984-85 35.5%

$57.0 million

$40.0 million (estimate)

$27.7 million

Funding approach: formula based on number of AFDC children; LEAs with either 5U or more AFDC children

or 10% AFDC children are eligible.

Targeting approach: students in "greatest educational need" in Chapter 1 eligible buildings;

educational need is determined by local needs assessments for which the State does not prescribe

criteria for scores necessary to participate.


1979-80

1963-84


216

625,000

not available


grades assessed: decided at the local level

Expected uses: decided at the local level

First graduating class assessed: caries at the local level

166

217

Ohio (continued)


The emphasis of school improvement activities In Ohio is on the building level. The State requires

school level plans. It also administers a voluntary effective schools program in which many districts

have participated.

reacher reforms

218

A career ladder program is under consideration. The State Board has proposed establishing an entrance

exam for prospective teachers.

169

29

Dklahoma


Total allocation

Total LEA grants



State administration set aside per operating



Total number or. participants

Number of participants 10.-4






Percent of all public school

Title IghePtet I

Percent of students

Percent of studeors

Percent of students

Percent of students

English-proficient

Percent of students

services

Percent of students

guidance services

students

LEN

served

served in

receiving reading

receiving math




receiving atteodance and


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE st..If members

Nunber of FIE teachers

Number of FTE aides



Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure

instructional settings: Pullouts predominate in



1979-80 lost Recent Yeer

Percent

ChangeAmount Rrink Amount Ram Year

$34,103,281 2.7 339,620,777 Al 1984-85 9.7

fi32.444,30e 2b 5.56,50,347 0 1984-d5 11.4

$2.1.293,119 27 1981 -43 -26.3

t15,109.478 25 1984-0 -12.0

t534,501 27 5373,30 11 1984-85 -10.4

$60 48 6403 48 1984-43 -10.2

115,025 2.1 93,442 15 1984-8) -45.2

79,446 2.1 bi,D90 23 1982-83 -12.4

50,301 lb 43,984 17 1962-63 -12.b

28,844 12 0,515 14 1982 -83 -39.3

273 44 112 40 1982-83 14.3

(not available) 2.1 39 1980-41

79,175 22 41,374 23 1962-43 -22.

13.4 li 18.1 15 1982-83

73.4 38 13.0 38 1982 -83

34.2 24 34.0 to 1981-83

17.8 5 14.7 7 1941 -83

0 HA NA 1982 -83

9.6 17 2.0 18 1982-81

14.7 17 8.b 18 1962-83

2,896 26 1,841 26 1982-83 -36.4

1,446 20 1,219 2U 1902-83 -Z5.9

915 29 551 33 1982-83 -39.8

115 15 32 29.5r 1942-43 -72.2

27.4 42 33.5 42 1982-63 22.3

t409 47 $510 41 1982-83 24.7

1984 -85

1984 -85

220170

Oklahoma (continued)

147940 MnSL Reitent Year


Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs NO 6 617 li 1942-33 -U.2

Overall average per pupil erpeaditure 14,818 JJ 12,139 21 1962-43 49,0


1879-80 dollars$2,02b 27 002-43 10,2


schools 543,458 25 593,825 25 1982-83 1.6


schools 16,335 41 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools2.1 50 1900-81


and secondary schools '4,117 3d 1980-81

Percent of nonpublic earollment in religiously

affiliated schools d6.4 19 198U-81


Per capita income 32 Jit,705 32 1984 46.3

KTS tax capacity index 104 14.5f iLo 5 1982



P.L. 94-142 59,113 25 61,995 24 1942-43 8.3


P,L. 89-313 1.484 31 1,824 31 188243 -3.2


P.L. 94-142 and F.L. 89-313 combined 1117 8 1910-81





Percent Blackd.6 25 1980

Percent Asian and Pacific islander 0.7 23 1)80

Perceat American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 7.d 5

11:Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 2.6 2U

Percent of children aged 5-0 in poverty 15.1 14.5f 1980



Percent of Children

in Poverty

24.1 0 - 10

35.7 II - 10

23.1 21 - 3U

12.2 31 - 40

4.9 > 40


Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs

221 171

9.3 fulsa

25.3 Tulsa. Oklahoma City. Putnam City (Oklanoma City),

Lawton, Midwest City

Oklahoma (continued)



No program


A plan for statewide testing will be submitted to the State legislature in 1985.


Oklahoma does not have a planning requirement nor does it sponsor any effective schools projects.

leacher reforms

222

The legislature has approved an extra $500 annually to mentors. In 1980 it approved $16 million

annually for increasing education school entrance requirements, establishing an exit exam, requiring

districts to provide inservice programs, and establishing a mentor program for first year teachers. The

State Board is In the process of setting minimum criteria for all candidates for admission to teaching

training programs.

172

223

OkECON

1979 -8U Most Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount dank Amount Rank Year

fitle 1/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $42,980,926 29 538,183,161 JO 1984-85 15.7

Total LEA grants $24,059,776 33 $27,227,799 32 1984-85 13.2

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $15,953,933 34 1981 -83 -33.7

$18,055,816 42 1984 -85 -21.b

State administration set aside $487,521 29 $357,956 30 1984-0 -V1.6

State adminiettation set aside per operating LEA $1,568 39 $1,158 39 1984-85 -26.1

LEA child count for formula purposes 64,499 35 57,415 34 1984-8S -11.0


Total number of patticipaats


47,326

32,066

30

32

36,337

25,730

31

32

1982-83

1982 -84

-23.2

-11.8

Number of participants 7-12 14,910 23 ware 23 1982-83 -31.1

Number of nonpublic participants 850 34 840 26 1982-8J -1.2


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 2.0 41 1980-61 --

Number of public participants 46,476 30 35,497 31 1982-d3 -13.6


Title I/Chapter 1 10.0 27 7.9 3U 1981-83





12.1 12 16.3 6 1982-83

English-proficient


U WA NA 1182-B3.1.10

services 3.1 22 -- NA 1982-83





Number of FfE teachers 656 35 425 36 1982-83 -45.2

Number of FTE aides 1,045 27 571 31 1982-83 -45.4



Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 008 32 $594 JO 1982-83 16.9


LEAs and it is not known If the SEA encourages

or discourages them 1964-85

Schoolvide projects: None reported by SEA1984-85

111224

Oregon (continued)

1979-80 Most Receut Year

Amount Rank Amount Rank Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 311 18 3U9 18 1982-83 -0.b

Overall average per pupil expenditure $2,576 7 53,425 8 1982-0 33.0


1979-80 dollars 52,533 8 1982-83 -1.7

Enrollment in public elementaty and secondaryschools 467,128 31 448,184 3i 1982-83 -4.1


schools 27,828 34 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in oonpublic schools 5.7 40 19811-81


and secondary schools 23,769 33 1980-el



Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 492,42; 31 1980-81

Fer capita income $8,02 21 $11,582 34 1984 33.4

RTS tam capacity index 10e 16 99 24f 1982



P.L. 94-142

dumber of handicapped children served under

39,464 32 41,052 34 1982-83 4.0

P.L. 89-313 4,681 14 5,10 it 1982-81 10.0


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combioed 9.1 28 1980-81


prof!cient 0.7 19 1980





Percent Merton Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 1.b 12 1980


Percent of childten aged 5-17 in poverty 10.8 411 198U


Percent of Children


42.3 0 - 10

44.8 11 - 20

10.0 21 - 30

1.9 31 - 40

1.0 > 40


Percent poor children in State In 5 largest LEAs

2?5 174

14.4 Portland

24.7 Portland, Salem, Beaverton. Eugene, North Clackamas

(Hilwaukie)

Oregon (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: decide4 at the local level




The State has set general planning requirements but allows the districts much flexibility in the design

of their programs. There are no State-sponsored effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The California Basic Skills Test will be required for certification beginning in 1986. A Governor's

commission has recommended an alternative certification plan for college graduates with no education

school training, in which competency teats in basic skills, subject area, and education related areas

must be passed. The commission also proposed that a master teacher certificate be established.

175

226

227

PENNSYLVANIA

1979-80 Host Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Rank Yea

Title I/chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation S/43,095,770 5 5159,383,796 5 1984-85 11.4

Total LEA grants t126,074,4/7 4 S143,490,367 5 1184-85 13.1


599,370,060 5 1984-85 -21.1

State administration set aside $1,114,715 S 51,494,17/ S 1984-05 -19.3

State administration set aside pet operating LEA 54,196 24 $2,988 23 1984-85 -28.8

LEA child count for formula purposes 335,170 4 319,o39 6 1984-85 -4.b



Number of patticipauts K6 192,391 4 163,777 4 1982-83 -14.9


Number of alopublic participants 25,947 2 22,23o 2 1982-84 -14.3


in Title I/Chaptet 1 toot available) 6.2 9 198041

Number of public participants 242,703 4 204,818 4 1982-84 -15.n

Perceat of all public school students served In

71c1a 1/Chapter 1 12.3 15 11.5 11 1982-83

!.rcent of students receiving reading 86,8 11 89.8 2 1982-83

vwtent a students receiving math 41.5 16 40.7 lo 1982-83

of students receiving language art.: 2.8 33 0.0 39 1982-83me.

Peromt of students receiving English for i1aited-

Engligh-pr3ficieftt 2.8 9 1.9 11 1982-83


services 3.8 21 0.2 25 1982-83





Number of FTE teachers 197 45 2,924 4 1982-83 1384.3

Number of Fre aides 3,394 5 2,147 8 1982-83 -36.7


Title I/Chapter 1 pupil/staff ratio 32.2 48 38.5 49 198:-83 19.6

Title I/Chapter 1 average pet pupil expenditure $412 4U 1498 45 1982-03 5.5

Instructional settings: Pullouts predomiaate in

LEAs and the SEA eacourages them 1984-85


228176

Pennsylvania (continued/

1979-110 Most Recenr Year


fercent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 504 12 5U() 12 1982-63 -0.8

Overall average per pupil expenditure S1.431 13 $3,118 14 1982-63 32.4

Overall average per pupil expenditure is adjust.]

1979-80 dollars $2,380 14 1982-83 -2.1


schools 1,968,801 6 1,783,969 b 1982-83 -9.4

Enrollment is nonpublic elementary and secondaryschools 402,058 3 19B0 -81

Percent of total enrollment to nonpuultc schools 17,4 4 198U-d1


and secondary schools 3o2,080 3 1980-81



Total earoilment in elementary and secondary schools 2,311,350 5 19d0-81

Per capita income $d.513 23 S12,343 25 1964 45.0

RIS tax capacity index 93 341 89 ibr 19d2



P.L. 94-142 174,931 b 177,905 6 1982-83 1.7


P.L, 89-313 15,313 3 18,372 1 1982-83 20.0


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 8.6 34 198U-81

Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-Engiish-proficient 0.5 22 1980


Percent Otte 87.5 22 1980



Percent American ludianiEskimo/Aleut U.1 49 1900




Percent of Children


50.7 0 - 10

42.0 11 - 20

6.1 21 - 30

1.2 31 40

0 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 30.5 Philadelphia

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 30.1 Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Erie, Bethelehem,

Allentown

229177

Pennsylvania (continued)



Program will begin in the 1985-86 school year

Funding approach: $17 million will be allocated on the bade of each LEA's current proportion of State

aid; an additional 17 million will be allocated on the basis of the number of students scoring below the

cutoff level on the statewide achievement test.

Targeting approach: students in grades 3, 5, and B will be selected on the basis of test scores.



Grades assessed: 3, 5, B




Both districts and individual schools are required to develop five-year plans for school improvement in

Pennsylvania. Districts receive $1.00 per child frog the State to help pay for the long range planning

activities. The State does not sponsor any effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

230

A statewide career ladder or merit pay program is under consideration. Beginning in 1987, new teachers

will be required to pass testa in basic skills and their subject areas. New teachers will also have a

one year internship.

11B231

MODE ISLAM!


Percent


Title I/ChaRteLlAlocation Data

Total allocation S10,1)6,445 4i $11,232,345 42 1954-83 8.4

fetal LEA grants $9,439,796 4U $10,661,727 39 1984-85 12.9

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $6,530,00/ 4U 1982-83 -30.8

$7,383,467 39 1984-85 -21.8

State administration set aside S225,000 44.51 $225,0u0 43.5r 1984 -85 0

State administration Ott aside per operating LEA $5,625 17.5 $5,o25 8.5 104-85 0

LEA child count for formula purposes 25,949 43 24,207 42 1984-45 - b. 1



Number of participants K -6 12,U25 39 8,380 43 1982-83 -40.3

Number of participants 7-12 b,593 Jo 3,565 37.51 1982-83 -45.9



in Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 3.8 22 1980-81 --



Title 1/Chapter 1 11.6 lb 8.0 29 1982 -83

Percent of atudeuts receiving reading 44.9 51 76.1 35 1982-83

Percent of students receiving math 16.2 46 15.4 46 1982-83 .Percent of students receiving language arts 11.8 b b.f 21) 1982 -83




eervlces 1.1 33 35.9 4 i982 -83




Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 64b 43 426 44 1982-83 -34.1

Number of FTE teachers 339 39 205 39 1982-U3 -21.8


Numbet of FTE administrative staff 21 36 27 32 1982-83 28.6

Title I/Chapter i pupil/staff ratio 29.0 45 28.3 30 1982-83 -2.4

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $504 35 5734 16 1982-83 45.6


LEAD and it is not 'mown if the SEA encourages

or discourages them 1984-85

Schoolvide projects: None reported by SEA 1904-5)

23r)119

Rhode Leland (continued,

1979-80 Most Recent tear

Percent

ChangeAmount Kank Amount dank hat


Number of operating LEAs 40 45.5f 40 45.51 1982-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure 52,444 12 S3,401 7 1942-44 4i.4


1979-80 dollars $2,560 7 1982-63 4.6


schools 154,098 43 139,362 44 1982-83 -9.6

Enroilmenr in nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools 29,875 33 198U-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 16.d 7 1940-41



Perceet of nonpublic enrollment in religiously

affiliated schools 91.2 i2 1980-81



RTS tax capacity index 84 43 Si 46 1982



P.L. 94-142 15,322 40 18,146 39 1982 -83 18.4


P.L. 89-313 749 44 443 48 1982-83 -40.9



Perceor of children aged 5-17 limited-English-







Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin 2,6 23 1980



Percent of Children


62.5 0 - 10

30.0 11 - 20

7.5 21 - 30

0 31 - 400 > 40

Perceet poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 30.9 Providence

Perct.... poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 54.6 Providence, Warwick, Pawtucket, Cranston,

East Providence

233180

Rhode Island (continued)

Other State Programa


Allocations

1979 -60 $2.0 million

1964 -65 $2.0 million

1964 -65 allocation in adjusted 1979-60 dollars $1.4 million


1979-80 19.2%

1964 -65 17.9%

Funding approach: each LEA receives the same proportion of SCE funds as it receives of the total

Chapter 1 allocation for the State.

Targeting approach: defined by educational and economic criteria; generally similar to Chapter 1.


1979-80

1983-84


No program set at the State level


7,200 (estimate)

not available

The Rhode Island Local Planning and Assessment Process is a long-range school improvement effort

primarily focused at the district level. Technical assistance is provided by the SEA. The State

sponsored about 20 effective schools projects in 1984. Promotion of effective schools research is a

priority of the Chief State School Officer for 1965.

Teacher reforms

A statewide career ladder or merit pay program has not been reported for Rhode Island. The legislature

has asked the SEA to explore the feasibility of requiring a basic skills test before initial teacher

certification.

234 235161

SOUTH L 0 NA

1979-8U Most Recent tear

Percent



Total allocation $57,965,593 19 149,035,128 22 1984-0 -15.4

Total LEA grants 154,610,003 18 146,953447 21 1984-85 -14.0


131,516,168 21 1984-65 -40.5

State administration set aside 1056,633 19 $459,690 22 1984-85 -46.3


LEA child count for formula purposes 209,477 17 145,717 19 19E4-85 -30.4


Total number of participants 97,960 19 o2,061 22 1982 -83 -36.6

Number of participants K-6 68,401 19 50,133 24 1982-83 - 0.7

Numbet of participants 7-12 28,985 11 11,U95 22 1982-83 -61.7



in Title 1/Chapter I (not available) 1.3 45 1980-81 --



Title 1/Chapter 1 15.6 8 10.1 17 1982-63



Percent of students receiving langiage arts 15.8 8 13.8 12 1982-83

Percent of students receiving English for Haired-

English-proficient U NA NA 1982 -83


services 38.9 5 44.1 2 1982-83

Percent of students receiving anendance and


Title 1/Chapter 1 Program Charactetistics

Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 4,456 17 3,147 18 1982-83 -/9.4

Number of FIE teachers 1,621 21 1,132 22 1982-83 -40.2


Numbet of FTE administrative staff 95 20 75 20 1982-83 -21.1

Title I/Chaptet 1 pupil/staff ratio 22.0 17 19.7 5 1982-83 -10.5

title 1/0baptet 1 average per pupil expenditure $557 24 MI 7 1982-63 43.0



them 1984-85


236182

South Carolina (continued)

1979-80 Moot Recent Year


Percent

Change


Number of operattng LEAs 92 34 92 38 1982-83 0


Overall average per pupil expenditure la adjusted

1979-80 dollars 51,425 49 i982-83 -118


schools 624,795 24 6iA,51e 24 1901-83 -IAEnrollment in nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools 49,619 27 1980-81







Per capita lame $6,219 44 118,025 46 1984 49.9

RTS tax capacity index 76 49.5f 74 49.5f 1982

Student Characteristic!)


P.L. 94-142 69,756 21 70,346 21 L962-83 0.9


P.L. 89-313 1,708 32 1,319 36 1982-03 -22.8






Percent Vhite 61.9 48 1980



Percent American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 0,2 40 1980





Percent of Children

in Poverty

6.5 0 - 10

34.4 Ii 20

29.0 21 - 30

22.6 31 - 4U

7.5 > 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 6.1 Greenville County

Petcent poor children In State In 5 largest LEAs 26,2 Greenville County, Charleston County, Richland

(Columbia), Aiken County, dereeleY

2


Other State Frgrams

State compensatory education

Allocations

1979-80 not applicable; program began in the 1984-85 school year

1984-85 $64.5 million


1984-85 123.5%

Funding approach: funds allocated on a per pupil basis at two different funding levels ( "compensatory"

and "remedial") and within five categories; categories are classified by a combination of grade level

and percentile rank on the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills.

Targeting approach: students in grades 1-12 are targeted for either compensatory or remedial education

based on their scores in reading andlor math on the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills.

Number o! students eligible

1984 -95 257,411 (duplicated count, students eligible for service in more than one

subject area are counted twice)



Grades assessed: 1-3, 6, 8, 11 (beginning in the 1985-86 school year, grade 10 will be tested instead

of grade 11)

Expected uses: grade promotion, high school graduation, remediation


I u184 229

240



The State requires school level planning and sponsors effective school projects. In June 1984, the

legislature approved an incentive grant program which will reward schools and districts for achievement,

improved student and teacher attendance, and parent participation. The legislature also required that

criteria be established for the evaluation of district qualityand authorized the State to assist or

Intervene in districts that do not meet the criteria.

Teacher reforms

ID 1984 the legislature established a teacher incentive program for superior performance, It is

supported by the unions which aremonitoring the development of pilot programs. For initial

certification, prospective teachers must pass the National leacher Examination (NTE). The SEA has

developed tests for certification in areas not covered by the NTE. College graduates with degrees in

areas of critical need who pass anexamination will be allowed to teach under provisional contracts.

185241

SO0fd DWI A


Percent



Totai allocation $9,703,732 45 $9.794,210 0 1984-85 0.9

Total LEA grants $9,059,476 4l $9,181,192 43 1984-85 1.3

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $6,543.453 39 1982-83 -27.8

66,358,166 43 1984-85 -19.8

State administration set aside $225,000 44.51 $225,000 43.A 1984-0 0

State administration set aside per operating LEA 11,203 43 01,203 38 1984-85 U

LEA child count for formula purposes 34,967 39 27,517 41 i984-85 -21.3

Title 1/Chalter 1 Participation Data


Number of participants K-6 11,930 41 10,337 41 1182-83 -13,4

Number of participants 7-12 3,269 43 2,403 43 1982-83 -2b.5


Percent of all nonpublic school sttdents served

in Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 6.9 4 1980-81 .Number of public participants 14,373 43 12,1170 41 1982-d3 -16.0


Title I/Chapter 1 10.7 22 9.7 19 1982 -83


Percent of students receiving math 59.2 3 53.b 7 1982-83

Percent of students receiving language arts 4.1 29 1.9 37 198/-83MM.


English-proficient U NA -- NA 1982-83


services 0 NA -- NA 1982-03 --


guidance services 1.9 34 -- NA 1982-83

Title Ifehepter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 1,010 38 725 39 1982-83 -28.2


Number of FTE sides 491 36 371 36 1902-83 -24.4

Number of FTE administrative staff 6 4b 3 47 1982-83 -50.0

Title 1/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 15.1 3 17.6 2 1982-63 16.6

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 8593 18 $694 19 1982-03 17.0




186 24 2

South Dakota (continued)

1979-80 Hoar Recent Year

Amount Rank. Amount RUM Year

Percenr

Change

State Characrerlatics

Number of operating LEAn 187 26.5r 187 26.5r 1902-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure 51,798 id 52,388 40 1912-83 32.8


1979-80 dollars


$1,74b 40 198/-83 -1.8

schools 133,840 45 123,897 45 1982-83 -7.4


schools 10,098 43 1980-81




Percent of nonpublic enrolimenr in religiously


Total enrollment in elemenrary and secondary schools 09,405 45 190-81

Per capita income

RTS tax capacity index

$7,497

95

34

32

S11,049

07

36

38,5r

1984

1982

41.4

Student Characteriatics

Number of handicapped childten served under

P.L. 96 -142 9,272 4b 11,3U0 45 1982-83 21.9


F.L. 89-313 578 45 541 45 1982-83 -0.4



Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-English






Percent Amee.can Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 10.2 3 1980

Percent of schen:. enrollment of Spanish origin 0.7 50 1980

Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty i9.4 11 1980

DIstriburion of children in poverty acroee LEAs

Percenr of Children


8.2 0 - 10

25.5 11 20

30.1 21 - 30

18.4 31 40

17.9 > 40

Percent poor childreo in State in LEA with largest enrollment

Percent poor children in State in S largest LEAs

243187

5.L Sioux fails

19.2 Sioux Falls, Rapid City, Aberdeen. ibanuon County,

Watertown

South Dakota (continued)



No program


No Program established at the State level


The State has a planning requirement and sponsors effective school projects.

Teacher reforms

244

In 1984 the legislature passed a resolution to study merit pay and career ladder plans. The Governor

has proposed a three level career system with a one year apprenticeship, a minimum of three years at the

instructor level, and a senior level with appropriate increases in salary at each level. The Governor

has also proposed competency testing for the graduates of teacher training programs.

188 245


Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Ranm Year


Total allocation $69,026,352 lb 65,029,936 15 1984 -d) -5.8

Total LEA grants 65,907,511 15 62078,531 14 1984-85 -4.9

Total LEA grants to adjusted 1979-80 dollars 144,109,118 15 1982-83 -33.1

543,406,185 14 1984-85 -34.1

State administration set aside 51,020,093 16 609,o37 15 1984-85 -40.2

State administration set aside per operatieg LEA 16,893 14 $4,176 i8 1984-85 -39.4

LEA child count for formula purposes 249,239 14 194,045 14 1984-d5 -22.1



Number of participants K-6 122,412 8 112,008 7 1982-8i 45Number of participants 7-12 16,613 13 26,037 9 1982-83 -2.2



in Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 1.0 47 1980-81 --

Number of public participants 150,306 10 137,223 8 1982-di -8.7


Title I/Chapter 1 17.4 5 16.6 3 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 75.3 3b 76.3 34 1982-83




English-proficient 2.2 12 4:: 0.1 28 1982-83

Percept of students receiving health and nutrition

services 14.1 14 9.4 13 1982-83




Numbs' of Title 1 /Chapter 1 FIE staff members 5,968 11 4,613 8 1982-83 -22.7

Number of FTE teachers 2,911 6 2,572 7 1982-83 -11.n




Title i /Chapter 1 average per pupil expeEditure t436 42 5632 48 1982-83 -0.9



them 1984-82


2 4 6.

Tenneafte (continued)

1979-UU Hoar Recent Year


Percent

Change

Srate Characteristics


Overall average per pupii expenditure $1,505 47 $1.945 48 1982-84 29.2


1979-80 dollars S1,434 48 1982-83 -4.4


schools 666,117 16 828,264 15 1982-84 -4.4


schools 71,611 20 198U-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 7.7 28 1980 -51


and secondary schools )0,823 20 1980-81



Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 925,186 lb 1960-81

Per capita income 37,080 46 310,400 41 19d4 46.9

RTS tax capacity index 81 4).S'f 77 48 1982



P.L. 94-142 91,394 15 lt4,ot3 13 1982-53 14.5


P.L. 89-313 1,610 33 1,468 34 1982-83 -8.8







Percent slack 19.b 13 1980

Percent As. and Pacific Islander 0.3 44 1980


Percent of school enrollment of Spanish orien 0.8 43 1980


Distribution of children In poverty across LEAs


Percent of Children

in Poverty

8.5 0 -1045.1 IL 20

32.6 21 - 30

12.0 31 - 40

2.1 > 40

Percent poor children In State In LEA with largest enrollment 22.2 Memphis dry

Percent poor children in Srate in S largest LEAs

247190

36.5 Memphis City, Nashville-Davidson Counry,

Chattanooga City, Knox County (Knoxville),

Shelby County Ulemphis

Tennessee (continued/



No program



Grades assessed: 8-12, and, at local discretion, 4 or 5 or 6



School Improvement progra

All districts must develop a school improvement plan on an annual basis. The State has piloted the

Incentive Funding Project, in which incentive awards, based on measured gains of student proficiency or

percentage of students performing above a certain level, are given to the school to be distributed by

the school faculty. There are no State-sponsored effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

The Tennessee legislature has approved the Governor's five-step career ladder program with annual

incentives ranging from MO to $7,000. The program, will cost $1.2 billion over a three year period.

New teachers will serve for a probationary year folawed by a three year apprentice certification.

Master teachers will have eleven or twelve month contracts. Advancement is tied to evaluations, but the

Tennessee Education Association is trying to remove teacher testing and peer evaluation from the career

ladder system. The State also has merit pay bonuses ranging from $1,000 to $7,UUU. Students entering

State teacher training programs must pass the California Achievement Test or a preprofessional skills

test and a composition test. Graduates must pass tests of skills and subject area mastery.

191

2482q



Percent

Change

Title I/Chapter 1 Allocarlso Data

Total allocation 1244,435,041 3 $248,925,559 3 1984-85 1.8

Total LEA grants 1174,757,350 3 $163,936,533 3 1984-85 5.3


$127,379,870 3 1984-85 -27.1

State administration set aside $3,612,3.19 3 52,333,605 3 1984-85 -35.4


LEA child count for formula purposes 644,917 3 '71,701 3 1984-85 -11.4



Humber of participants K-6 347,U95 2 271,026 2 1982-83 -21.9


Number of nonpublic participants 5,185 10 6,541 7 1982-83 2b.3


in Title 1/Chapter I (not available) 3.8 23 1980-81 --



Title I /Chapter 14.3 10.4 14 1982-83



Percent of students receiving language arts 108 1, 3.5 30 1982-83


English-proficient o.0 6 9.3 6 1982-b3


services 30.1 6 -- NA 1982-83


guidance services 24.4 10 NA 1982-83


Number of Title 1/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 13,951 3 15,690 1 1982-83 12.5

Number of FTE teachers 5,068 5,b9U 1982-83 12.3

Number of FTE aides 5,734 3 8,163 2 198243 42.4

Number of FTE administrative staff 1,662 1 274 1 1982-83 -83.5

Title I/Chapter 1 pupil /staff ratio 30.2 47 20.1 6 1982-83 -33.4

Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil empenditute 1415 44 $521 39 1982-8J 25.5


LEAs althono SEA does not encourage or discourage

them 1984-85

Schooluide projects: Yes 1984-85

2500192

Texas (continued)

1979-80 Host Aecenr Year

AMEND' RanK Amount sank Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 1,077 1 1,075 1 1982-83 -0.Z

Overall average per pupil expenditure ti,8E5 3b $2,033 31 1982-83 45.1

Overall average per pupil expendirure in adjusted

1979-80 dollars 51,947 31 1982-83 7.3


schools 2,872,719 i 2,985,659 2 1982 -b3 3.9


schools 148,534 11 1980-81


Enrollment io religiously affiliated elemenraty




Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 3,048,607 3 198U-81


EIS tat capacity index 117 4 130 4 1982



P.L. 94-142 252,893 2 272,999 2 1982-83 8.0


P.L. 89-113 14,719 4 16,344 4 1982-83 11.0

Percent' of total school enrollment served by










percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 18.4 12 1980



Percent of Children

in Poverty

24.0 O 10

35.7 11 - 20

22,2 II - 30

10.6 31 - 40

7.6 > 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with iargesr enrollment

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest Las

2 5 1193

7.8 Houston

24.4 Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio, El Paso

252

Texas (continued)


Compensatory education program

Allocations.

1979-80 $42.9 million

1984-85 $319.4 million



1979-80 17.6%

1984-85 128.3%

Funding approach: based on a per pupil amount using the previous year's best six month average

enrollment in the free or reduced price lunch program; formula uses ADA multiplied by an adjusted basic

allotment, multiplied by 02.

Targeting approach: State and/or local testing programs are used to identify students performing below

district expectancy levels in basic skills.


New program, described below, becomes effective in school year 1985-86


Grades assessed: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12




Districts are required to submit five-year plans which identify education needs and program priorities.

Effective schools and teacher research is being utilized in the !lade Skills Project to assist low

achieving districts in improving the delivery of instruction.

Teacher reforms

Beginning in Ray 1986, a three tiered certification system will go into effect with provisional

certificates, standard certificates, and professional certificates which require a Masters or Ph.D

degree. Salaries will be based on degree held and a "public-differential index." A basic skills exit

test will be required for certification beginning in May 1986. Current teachers must pass basic skills

and subject area competency tests.

194253

UTAH

1979-8U Most Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Plane *fear

title I/chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $.10.165,948 4: $12,069,860 40 1984-85 18.1

Total LEA grants $8.951,h/7 43 510,333,298 4U 1984-85 15.4

Total LEA grants .n adjusbl 1979-80 dollars $6,235,322 42 1982-83 -30.3

57,156,023 4u 1984-85 -10.1

State administration set aside t225,000 44.5T 6225,000 4J.5r 1984-85 0

State administration set aside per operating LEA $5,625 17.5l $5,o-25 EI.5r 1984-8; U

LEA child count for formula purposes 34,283 40 3!,350 30 1984-85 -2.7

Title I/Chapter I Participation Data

Total number e participants 21,666 38 16,839 36 1982-0J -22.4

Number of participants K-b 17,913 38 l'1,020 3d 1982-83 -21.7

Numbet of participants 7-12 3,774 42 2,819 41 1982-83 -25,J

Number of nonpublic participants I/8 47 ti9 49 1982-03 -nia


in Title I/Chapter I (not available) 0.9 49 198U-81

Number of public participants 21,511 38 16,770 48 1182-8J -22.0


Title I/Chapter 1 6.5 47 4.5 50 1902-8J



Percent of students receiving language arts 0 NA 0,3 40 1982-83




services 0 NA 20.9 9 1982-83


guidance services

title I/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

0 NA 0.8 35 1982-83 40.

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 951 39 750 38 1982-83 -21.1

!limber of FTE teachers 185 46 103 48 1902-83 -44.3

Numbet of FTE aides 706 32 598 28 1982-83 -I5.j

Number of FTE administrative staff 18 J9 12 39 1982-83 -33.3

Title I/chapter i pupil/staff ratio 22.8 22 22.5 13 1982-83 -1.3

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure $41J 45 $501 43 1982-03 21.3

Instructional settings: Puilouts predominate in


them 1984-85

Schonlwide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-85

254195

Utah (continued)

1979-80 Hose Recent Year


Percent

Change


Humber of operating LEAs 40 45.5r 40 45.5f 1982-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,606 43 11.918 41 1942-83 13.2


1979-80 dollars $1,463 47 1982-83 -8.9


schools 333,049 35 370,183 35 1982-83 11.1


school* 5,555 49 1980-81



ant secondary schools 3,693 49 1980-81.




Per capita income 17,106 42 19,719 50 1984 3o.8

RTS tax capacity index 87 40 RI 40.3T 19d2


Number of handicapped children setved under

P.L. 94-142 34,847 34 37,384 35 1982-83 7.3


P.L. 89-313 1,280 3b 1,544 33 1982-83 23.4



Percent of children aged 5-17 limited- English-




Percent Black OA 44 1980


Percent American Iodinn/Eskimo/Aleut 2.0 11 1980




Percent of Children


37.5 0 10

55.0 11 - 20

2.5 21 - 30

5.0 31 4U

0 > 40

Percent poor children in State In LEA with largest enrollment 14.0 Granite (Salt Lake City)

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 49.7 karate (Salt Lake City), Jordan (Sanu),

Oavis county (Farmingroc), Alpine (American

Fork), Salt Lake City

255196

Utah (continued)



Allocations

1979-80 $1.0 million

1984-85 0.9 million



1979-80 9.8%

1984-85 7.4;

Funding approach: for each LEA, the number of weighted pupil units is multiplied by the ratio of

disadvantaged pupils in the LEA to State total; disadvantage is defined by a combination of educational

and socio-economic criteria; SCE funds are part of a State entitlement which may be used to support any

combination of special programs included in a block grant.

Targeting approach: students from low income families, foster children, neglected and delinquent

children, and AFDC children who achieve far below the average level for their age.


1979-80

1983-84


256

5,000 (estimate)

3,238





197

2S.

Utah (continued)


Utah does not have a planning requirement or does it sponsor au eUective schocl projects.

Teacher reforms

Thf legislature has autloriced 45.2 million for dietricta t) develop career ladder plans that meet the

approval of the State Board. Graduates of State institutions must be certified as computer literate in

order to gain State certification.

l9d

2i829

VERMONT

1979-80 Most Anent tear

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount dank Year

Title L/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $6,789,642 48 38,183,184 47 1984-85 10.5

Total LEA grants 54,959,451 48 tb,146,599 48 1984 -85 23.9

Total LEA grants In adjusted 1979 -80 dollars $3,003,636 50 1982-83 -39.4

S4,256,648 48 1984-85 -14.2

State administration set aside E225,000 44.51 S225,000 41,5f 1984-85 0

State administration set aside per operating LEA 3918 46 syll 43 1984-85 -0.8

LEA child count for formula purposes 15,339 48 14,55U 49 1984-85 -5.1



Number of participants X-6 7,776 46 6,U67 47 1982 -83 -22.0

Number of participants 7-12 2,555 45 1,451 4b 1982-83 -41.2

Number of nonpublic participants 421 41 309 41 1982-83 -26.o


to Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) ''.7 15 1980-81

Number of public patticipants 10,462 4u 7,574 47 1982-61 -17.6


Title 1/Chapter 1 10.6 24 8.3 28 1982-83







services 10.6 16 NA 1982-83


ftidaace services 5.7 30 1.3 33 1902-83


Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members 509 47 333 47 1982-83 -34.6

Number of FTE teachers 232 43 1b2 43 1982-83 -30.2

Number of FTE aides 224 44 142 45 1982-83 -36.b

Number of FTE administrative staff 17 4U 12 41 1982-83 -29.4


Title 1/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure t456 41 bp 40 1982-83 12.9



them 1984-85

Schoolmide projects! None reported by SEA 1984-85

260199

Vermont (continued)

1979-80 Host decent Year

Amount Rank Amount Vint( Year

Percent

Chalge


Rumber of operating LEAs 245 23 247 23 1902-83 0.8



1979-80 dollars 42,213 22 1902-03 15.0


schools 98,338 4? 91,454 49 1902-83 -7.0


schools 7.555 4b 1980-01


Enrollment in religiously affIllared elementary



affiliated schools So.& 47 1980-81

Total enrollment in elemeatary and secondary schools 103,370 49 198U-81

Per capita income $7,268 60

111"g39 1984 47.Z

RTS tax capacity index 85 41.5T 38T 1982



P.L. 94-142 10,139 43 7,053 50 082-83 -30.4


P.L. 89-313 2,285 28 2,256 28 1982-83 -1.3

Percent of total school eotollnear served by


Percent of children aged 5-17 limited-Englis-




Percent Black


0.3

0.4

47

41

1980

9Percent American Indian /Eskimo /Aleut 0.2 38 t9:t?

Percent of school scroilment of Spanish origin 0.7 49 1940



Fercent of Children


28.1

50.0

17.5

2.0

1.8

0 -1011 - 20

21 30

31 - 40

> 40


Percent poor children In State in 5 largest LEAs

26121)0

1.2 Burlington

13.3 Burlington, Ht. Anthony Union (Bennington),

North Country Unified High (Derby), Champlain

Valley Unified High (Shelburne), itutlaod City

Vermont (continued)


Ste compensatory education program

No program







Vermont does not have a planning requirement. Some districts are implementing effective schools

projects with assistance from the SEA and the University of Vermont.

Teacher reforms

No statewide career ladder or merit pay programs have been reported. Vermont does not require testing

for initial certification.

201

262 263

VIRil


Percent

Changearl=1111m,

Amount Rank Amount Ranx Year



Total LEA grants 62,652,494 16 556,821,749 17 1984 -b5 -9.3

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $41,80n,899 lb 1982-83 -33.3

539,350,242 17 1984-05 -J7.2

State administration net aside $993,725 17 1500,U08 17 1984-85 -43.b


LEA child count for formula purposes 220,584 IS 157,b13 17 1984-85 -28.5

Title I/Chapter I Participation Data


Number of participants K-6 92,620 17 70,493 Id 1982-83 -23.9


Number of nonpublic participants* 9 51 0 51 1982 -83 -1110.11


in Title I/Chapter I* (not available) U.1 51 1980-81

Number of pubilc participants 111,172 15 83,389 19 1982-53 -25.4


Title 1/Chapter 1 10.8 20 8.6 25 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 77.4 32 MI 30 19U2 -d3

Percent of students receiving math 45.8 11 43.6 i3 1982-83



Esglish-proficient 1.1 18 1.9 12 1982-83


services 26.9 9 8.5 14 1982-83 .010111


guidance services 23.6 11 15.6 12 1982 -83

Title I/Cha ter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title 1/Chapter I FTE staff members 5,032 15 3,334 17 1962-e 33.7

Number of FTE teachers 1,760 18 1,405 18 1982-,.. :0.2

Number of FTE aides 2,630 11 1,498 i4 1981-83 -43.0


Title 1 /Chapt.r 1 pupil/staff ratio 22.2 19 25.0 21 1962-83 12.6

Title I/Chapter I average per pupil expenditure 5560 2] 6W8 21 1962-83 21.1


LEAs and the SEA encourages then 1984-85

Schroolvide projects: None reported by SEA 1984-85

* By-pass state in which independent contractors provide services to nonpublic school students.

gr)

Virginia t Continued 1


Amount utank Amount Rank Year

Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 135 35 135 35 1982-83 0

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,879 31 $2,549 36 1982-83 35.7


1979-80 dollars 51,885 36 1981-8.1 0.3


schools

enrollment in nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools

1,031,403 14 975,717

75,869

13

19

1981-83

1980-81

5.4

Percenr of total enrollment iu nonpublic schools 6.4 36 1980-81



Percept of nonpublic enrollment in religiously

affiliated schools 64.3 44 1980-Ei1

Total enrollment In elementary and secondary schools 1,U85,440 14 1980-81


RTS cal capacity index 94 34T 94 29 LW

Studenr Characteristics


P.L. 94-142 87,494 17 97,556 14 1982-83 11.2


P.L. B9 -313 3,357 19 3,157 20 1962-C3 -6.0


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 9.0 31 1960.81


proficleat 0.4 29 1980





Percent American Indian /Eskimo/Aleut U.4 26 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish Origin 1.1 31 198U


Distribution of children la poverty across LEAs


Percent of Children

in Poverty

19.4 0 - 10

46.0 11 - 20

30.2 21 30

4.3 31 - 40

0 > 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 3.7 Fairfax County

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 19.2 Fairfax County, Virginia Beach Ctty, Norfolk City,

Prince William County, Henrico County

202 5

Virginia (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: 1[76, 10-12




The Virginia Rural School Effectiveness Project is intended to help 26 LEAs implement _research on

effective schools and strengthen instructional programs in rural schools. The State does not have a

district or school planning requirement.

Teacher reforms

The legislature has approved $250,000 annually for a pay-for-performance pilot project in five

districts. Teachers must pass the National Teacher Examination for initial certification. Beginning in

July 1985, teachers must serve a two year probationary period before receiving permanent certification.

266

204

267

WASNINOTON

1979-Bu Most Recent Year

Percent



Total allocation 141,649,223 26 146,453,775 24 1984-85 11.5

Total LEA grants 130,935,920 21 134,577,829 27 1964-85 11.8

Total LEA greats in adjusted 1979-80 dollars 324,194,076 Z6 1982-81 -21.8

123,945,865 27 1984-45 -22.b

State administration set aside 5415,505 25 E435,491 24 1984-85 -29.2

State administration set aside Per operating LEA $2,051 34 $1,452 36 1984-85 -29.2

LEA child count for farmula purposes 92,713 28 90,052 27 1904-85 -2.9



Number of )articipauts 11 -6 42,442 29 45,914 25 1982-83 8.2


Number of nonpublic participants 1,291 24 934 74 1982-83 -27.7


in Title I/Chapter 1 (not available) 1.0 42 1980-81



Title I/Chapter 1 7.8 41 7.9 32 1982-83 --





Engiish-proficient 1.1 17 -- NA 1982-83


services 0 NA NA 1982-83


guidance services

title i/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

0 NA 3.0 28 i982 -63




Number of FIE administrative staff 48 28 34 26 1902-83 -29.2

Title I/Chapter I pupil/staff ratio 28.6 49 44,6 50 1902-83 55.9

Title I/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure i507 33 4552 36 1982-83 6.9

Instructional settings: Pullouts predominate is


thee L964 -85


205

268

Washington (continued)


Amount Rank Amount an Year

Percent

Change

State Characteristics 1

Number of operating LEAs 300 2L 300 21 1981-83 U

Overall average per pupil expenditure 82,498 9 $3,143 17 1981-83 25.8


1979 -80 doliars $2,325 17 1982-83 -6.9


schools 764,879 21 739,215 19 1982 -83 -3.4


schools 55,950 24 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment In nonpublic schools 6.4 37 198U-81




affiliated schools 84.1 25 19BU-81


Pet capita income $9,439 9 112,728 19 1984 34.8

RTS tax capacity index 103 21f 102 19 198!



P.L. 94-142 51,166 27 0,837 16 1981-83 18.9


P.L. 89-313 2,883 23 3,458 17 1982-83 19.9







Percent Black 3.0 37 1.4130

Percent Asiaa and Pacific Islander 2.9 3 1980

Percent American lodian/EskimoiAleut 2.0 10 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin L 4.0 lb 1980

Percent of childreo aged 5-17 in poverty 10.3 45 1980


Percent of Children


42.6

44.3

9.4

2.0

2.7

0 -10

11 - 20

21 30

31 - 40

> 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enroileent 9.0 Seattle

Percent poor children in State in 5 largest LEAs 11.9 Seattle, Spokane, Shoreline (Seattle), Tacoma,

Lake Washington (Kirkland)

2f$

270

Washington (continued)

OnerState Program

State compensatory edccation program

Allocations

1979-80 $6.7 million

1984-85 $10.5 million

1984-85 allocation in Ajusted 1979-80 dollars $7.3 million


1979-80 16.1%

1984-85 22.61

Funding approach: two separate formulas for students in grades 2-6 and students in trades 7-9; both

formulas utilize a per pupil amount based on enrollment and Statewide assessment scot es; grades 7-9 use

an additional multiplier.

Targeting approach: students in grades 2-6 who score below grade level in basic skills achievement;

students in grades 7-9 who score in lowest quartile on Statewide assessment.


1979-80

1984-85

32,352

30,000 (estitate)

A new SCE 1/rogram for grades K-12 will begin in the 1985-86 school year.


No program established at the State level.


The State has a planning requirement and sponsors some effective school projects.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder system is under consideration. A model competency examination for prospective teachers

is to be developed by 1987.

2U7

271

West Virginia

1979 -8U Host Recent Year

Percent

ChangeAmount Rank Amount Knns Year



Total LEA grants $28,554,172 28 $28,129.426 11 1984-85 -0,8

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $19,994,197 28 1982-83 -30.0

519,618,7lb 31 1984-85 -31.3

State administration set aside S443,242 32 $218,343 32 1984-85 -37.2

State administration set aside per operating LEA $8,059 11 $5,0o1 11 1984-85 -37.2

LEA child count for formula purposes 108,83i 27 75,122 29 1984-85 -31.0

Title I/Cha ter 1 Participation Data

Total number of participants 43,282 32 32,t47 34 1982-81 -26.6

Number of participants K-6 38,384 30 26,109 31 1942-83 -25.2




in Title 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 2.9 29 1980-81

Number of public participants 43,J7U 31 31,912 li 1982-83 -25.4


Title liChapter 1 11.2 19 8.5 27 1982-83

Percent of student"; receiving reading 85.6 13 79.5 26 1982-83


Percent of students receiving language arts 0 NA NA 1982-83


English-proficient 0 NA NA 1982-83


service': 27,9 7 NA 1982-83


guidance services 16.2 16 NA 1982-83 MO*


Number of Title I/Chaptet 1 FTE staff members 2,061 29 1,448 29 198Z-83 -29.7


Number of FIE aides 1,102 26 gI2 21 1982-83 -26.3



Title I/Chaptet 1 average per pupil expenditure $652 13 3041 5 1982-83 29.0

Instructional. settings: Pullouts predominate in


SchoeivIde projects: none reported by SEA 1984-85

272208

West Virginia (continued)

l979-8U Most Recent Year


Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 55 42 55 42 1482 -83 u

Overall average per pupil expenditure $1,612 37 52,104 Id 1982-63 49.2

Overall average per pupil expenditure In Adjusted

1979-80 dollars $2,1100 28 1982-83 1.0.4


schools 38)!,198 34 J7),115 34 1981 -83 -3.4


schools 11,608 42 1180-81


Enrollment la religiously affiliated elementary


Percent of mapublic enrollment in religiously


Total enrollment in elementary and secondary schools 396,111 34 PIOU-til

Per capita income $7,10U 44 $9,t 40 1984 itI.7

WM tax capacity index 92 36 J2f i982



P.L. 94-142 32,8b8 35 41,136 33 1982-83 25.2


P.L. 89-313 1,096 39 1,282 38 1982-83 17.0


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined 9.2 27 195U-di


proficient 0.1 5l 1980







Percent of children aged 5-17 in poverty 18.2 13 IVO

Distribution of children in povetty across LEAs


Percent of Children

In Poverty

3.6 0 -1043.6 11 - 2U

43.6 21 - 10

9.1 31 - 40

0 > 40


Percent poor children in State in 5 largest flits

273

7.4 Kanawha County (Charleston)

22.7 Kanawha County (Charleston), Wood County

(Parkersburg), Cabell (Huntington), italeigli

County (Beckley), Harrison County (Clarksburg,

West Virginia (continued)



No program




Each district ig required to develop an annual plan for school improvement that addresses locally

identified needs. The SEA will conduct an annual desk review of the plans with an on-site review

occurring every four years. The State does not sponsor any effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

A career ladder plan is under consideration. Prospective teachers must pass a pre-professional skills

test, a content area test, and professional education assessment.

210 275

274

WISCON8iN

Title i/Chaptet 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation

Total LEA grants

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollats

State administration set asideState administration set aside per operating LEA











Title 1/Chapter 1

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

Percent of students

English-proficient

Percent of students

services

Percent of students

guidance services

served

served in

receiving reading

receiving math





title 1/Chapter 1 Program Characteristics

Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FTE staff members

Number of LIE teachers

Lumber of FTE aides






Schoolvide projects: None reported by SEA



Percent

Cnange

349,707.786 22 $47,05Q,510 23 1984-65 -3.7

t44075,654 22 S43,906458 23 1984-85 -1.5

528,652,135 22 1962-83 -33.7

$30,406,412 23 1984-65 -31.6

034,597 22 $448,565 23 1984-85 -38.9

$1,693 38 $1,113o 41 1984-85 -48.8

124.817 24 99,996 24 1984-45 -19.9

71,665 25 57,308 25 1982-83 -20.0

54,212 25 44,7io 26 1982 -6 -17.5

11,889 28 10,0914 25 1982-83 -15.1

4,226 14 4,361 12 1982-6 4.7

(not available) 2.5 34 1980-81

67,439 24 52,92n 26 1982-83 -21.5

7.9 39 6.7 42 1982-83

48.2 50 48.5 50 1982-83

33.2 28 29.3 34 1982-8338.6 2 11.4 4 1982-83

0.n 19 NA 1982 -83

0.9 34 NA 1982-83

31.2 23 NA 1982-83

3,086 25 2,209 25 1982-83 -28.4

1,478 23 1,327 19 1982-83 -10.2

1,246 23 541 34 1982-83 -36.6

105 18 87 18 1982-83 -17.1

23.2 25 25.9 18 1982-83 11.6

$622 16 5676 22 1982-83 8.7

1984-85

1944-65

276211

Wisconsin (continued)

1979 -8U Most Recent Year

Percent

Amount Rank Amount Kink Year Change


Number of operating LEAs 434 15 433 15 1982-83 -U.2

Overall average per pupil expenditure $2,198 15 0,194 15 1982-di 33.3


1979-80 dollars S2,3b2 15 1982-83 -1.4


schools 857,855 17 784,830 17 1982-83 -8.5


schools 1b2,361 9 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools L6.48 190-81

Enrollment in rerigiously affiliated elementary



affiliated schools 96.3 3 1980-8i


Per capita income S6,701 19 312,309 27 1964 41.5

RTS tax capacity index 100 A( 67 36.5f 1182


Number of handicapped children served unqer

P.L. 94-142 63,317 23 89,92b 23 1982-83 10.4


P.E. 89-313 2,294 27 2,293 27 1982-83 <0.1




ploficient 0.3 33 1980



Percent Black(1.5 3

5.5

292

1960

Percent Asian and Pacific Islander 1980





Percent of Children


59.1 0 - 10

32.6 11 - 20

7.9 21 30

0.5 31 - 48

0 "" 40

Percent poor children in State in LEA with largest enrollment 25.9 Milwaukee

Percent por children in State in 5 largest LEAs 34.5 Nilmaosee, Racine, Madison, (keen Bay, Kenosaa

207

Wisconsin (continued)



No program



Grades assessed: Once in grades 1-4, once in grades 5-8, and once in grades 9-10

Expected uses; high school graduation (at local option), remediation



District planning is required in Wisconsin but the State does not sponsor any effective schools projects.

Teacher reforms

278

A pay-incentive plan is being developed under the direction of a State advisory board. Testing for

initial certification is under consideration.

213 279

hYOMING

1979-80 ;ion Recent Year

Percent


rifle I/Chapter 1 Allocation Data

Total allocation $5,152,130 59 15.236,4.32 51 1984-85 1.b

Total LEA grants 0.939,715 50 63,723,120 51 1984-85 -5.3

Total LEA grants in adjusted 1979-80 dollars $2,617,061 51 1912-83 -33.n

62,578,338 51 1914-15 -34.o

State administration set aside t225.0UU 44.5t W15,0UU 43.51' 084-85 0

State administration set aside per operating LEA $4,592 20 34,592 15 191:14-d5 U


title 1/Chapter 1 Participation Data

10,473 51 7,011 51 1184-d5 -27.3

Total number of participants 4,735 51 1.841 51 i912-83 -18.9

Number of participants K-6 3,148 49 3,303 50 i912-1J -14.2

Number of participants 7-12 852 51 511 50 198Z-83 -39.2

Number of nonpublic participants 93 48 80 41 i982-0 -14.0


in Tit'.e 1/Chapter 1 (not available) 2.8 31 1980-81



Title 1/Chapter 1 4.9 49 3.7 51 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 80.3 25 17.1 b 1982-83


Percent of nucleate receiving language arts 5,1 23 1.8 31 1982-83




services 0 NA 2.4 15 1982-83


guidance services 11.3 22 12,3 15 1982-83 MANI


Number of Title 1 /Chapter I. FTE staff members 228 51 142 51 1982-83 -37.7





Title 1 /Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 4832 3 $921 2 1982-13 10.1

Instructional. settings: Pullouts predominate in


them 1914-85

Schoolvide projects! None reported by SEA 1914-15

2 804

Wyoming (continued)



Percent

Change


Number of operating LEAs 49 44 49 44 1902-83 U

Overall average per pupil expenditure S2,427 i4 $3,986 4 1982-dJ 64.2


1979 -BO dollars 52,944 4 1982-03 21.5

Enrollment is public elementary and secondary

schools 95,5U5 50 101,665 41 i982-83 0.4


schools 3,036 51 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools J.0 48 198U-81


and secondary schools 2,27o 51 1980 -81


affiliated schools 75.0 3o 1980-81


Per capita income 89,843 b $12,586 21 1984 27.9

RTS tax capacity index 173 2 201 2 198/



P.L. 94-142 8,849 49 9,837 48 1982-83 11.2

Number of handicapped children served uoder

P.L. 89-313 1,024 40 1,307 37 1582-83 27.6


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-3i3 combined 10.7 1980-81


proficient 0.3 3o 080School enrollment by race



Percent Asian and Pacific Islander U.5 36 1980

Percent American InliaaiEskimo/Aleut 2.4 8 1980

Percent of school enrollment of Spanish origin b.4 12 1980

Percent of children aged 5-17 Lo poverty 7.5 51 1580

Distribution of children in poverty across Las

Percent of Children


64.0 0 - 10

30.0 11 20

4.0 21 - 30

2.0 31 - 40

0 > 40

Percent poor children in state in LEA with largest enrollment 11.6 Natrona County (Casper)

Percent poor children in State In 5 le gest LEAs 39.7 Natrona County (Casper)., Laramie County (Cheyenne),

Sweetwater County (Rock Springs), Campbell County

Gillette), Albany County (Laramie)

2 810

Wyoming (continued)



No program







Districts are required to conduct a needs assessment and develop long-range plans indicating how the

needs will be addressed, there are no State-sponsored effective school projects.

Teacher reforms

A statewide career ladder or merit pay program has not been reported. Individuals in teacher training

programs at the University of Wyoming must pass the California Achievement Test to continue in the

program. The University is also developing a test of 17 competencies prior to certification.

282216

2K1

DISTRICT Uf COLUMBIA -mmmwmImmEmmp


Percent

ChangeAmount dank Amount dank Year


Total allocation $18,90,702 36 317,093,918 Jb )9,36-t& -MOTotal LEA grants $15,925,791 3b 113,028,449 37 A84-ti, -14.4

Total LEA grants In adjusted 1979-80 dollars 110,110,110 31 1982-83 -36.5

19,437,984 37 1984-85 -40.7

State administration set aside 1280,547 36 5225.000 43.51 19u4-d5 -19.8

State administration set aside per operating LEA 3280,547 1 3225,000 1.57 1984-85 -19.5

LEA child count for formula purposes 39,205 37 29,200 39 1984-85 -25.5



Number of participants K-6 11,903 42 13,211 49 1982 -83 11.0




in Title I/Chapter I (not available) 4.5 19 198U -81

Number of public participants 15,905 41 14,180 39 1942-8J -7.1


Title I/Chapter 1 15.0 9 16.2 4 1982-83

Percent of students receiving reading 60.0 46 70.8 41 1982 -83

Percent of students receiving each 40.0 17 29.2 35 1982-83 --

Percent of students receiving language arts 0 NA IA 1982-83 --


English-proficient 0 NA 14 1981 -63

Pe,. ..ut of students receiving health and nutrition

ion 17.7 11 NA 1982-83




Number of Title I/Chapter 1 FIE staff members 778 41 518 41 1982-83 -33.4


Number of FTE aides 337 40 3G9 38 1982-83 -8.3

Number of FTE administrative staff 19 38 13 3P 1982-83 -31.0

Title 1/Chapter 1 pupllfstaff ratio 21.7 15 30.1 34 1982-83 38.7

Title i/Chapter 1 average per pupil expenditure 3943 2 1878 4 1982-83 -43.9

Instructional settings: Not available 1984-85

Schoolwide projects: Not available 1984-85

284217

Distr ct o o um a cant nue


Annunt Rank Amount Rank Year

Percent

Change

Srate Characteristics

Number of operating LEAs 1 50.51- 1 50.5f 1904-83 U

Overall average per pupil expenditure t3, 02U 4 $4,1113 3 1982413 33.6


1979-80 dollars S3.035 3 19d2-83 -1.1


schools 106,15h 47 91.105 50 1982-83 -11.2

Enrollment In nonpublic elementary and secondary

schools 21,203 J6 1980-81

Percent of total enrollment in nonpublic schools 17.) 3 1940-81




affiliated pools MI 3.3 198U-81


Per capita income 510,89b 2 $16,845 2 1984 54.6

RTS tax capacity index 110 9T 115 11.)T 1982



P.L. 94-142 2,079 51 1,956 51 1982-83 -5.9


P.L. 89-313 3,138 21 3,853 14 1982-83 22.8


P.L. 94-142 and P.L. 89-313 combined ).2 51 1980-81







Percept American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut U.1 48 1980


Percent of children aged 5-12 in poverty 2b.3 2 1980


Percent of Children

Percent of Districts io Poverty

Not applicable

Percent poor children iu Srate in LEA with largest enrollment Not applicable

Percent poor children in St.te in 5 lari.est LEAs Not applicable

2R5

Documents

DOCUMENT RESUME - ERIC · DOCUMENT RESUME ED 293 948 UD 026 134 AUTHOR Michie, Joan S.; Moore, Mary T. TITLE State Profiles of ESEA Title I/ECIA Chapter 1. INSTITUTION Decisior Resources