Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BEMUSE PHASE II:BEMUSE PHASE II:COMPARISON AND ANALYSISCOMPARISON AND ANALYSIS
OF THE RESULTSOF THE RESULTSREV. 1REV. 1
A. Petruzzi, F. D’Auria
DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA MECCANICA, NUCLEARE E DELLA PRODUZIONE -UNIVERSITA' DI PISA56100 PISA - ITALY
Workshop on Evaluation of Uncertainties In Relation To Severe Accidents and Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Analysis
November 7 – 9, 2005 – Aix-En-Provence, (FRANCE)
FOREWORDFOREWORDBEMUSE: OECD/NEA/CSNI PROJECT (02BEMUSE: OECD/NEA/CSNI PROJECT (02--07)07)
PHASE I (completed)DESCRIPTION OF UNCERTAINTY METHODS
PHASE II (completed, report to be approved)LOFT ISP 13 (test L2-5) REVISIT & SENSITIVITY STUDY
PHASE III (activity completed, report to be issued)UNCERTAINTY METHOD APPLICATION TO TEST L2-5
PHASES IV AND V (started, to be endorsed by CSNI)
UNCERTAINTY METHOD APPLICATION TO ZION W NPP LBLOCA
THISPRESENTATION
KEYRESULTS
CONTENTSCONTENTSNODALIZATION QUALIFICATION
Nodalization Tables (Template N° 1, Pag. 1)
Pressures Vs Length Curve (New Request to the Participants)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONResulting Time Sequence of Events (Template N° 1, Pag. 1)
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments (T. #1)
Relevant Thermalhydraulic Aspects (RTA) Tables (Template N° 2, Pag. 1)
QUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONApplication of the FFTBM
USER’S EFFECT
SENSITIVITY STUDY (Template N° 3)2/50
PARTICIPANT ORGANIZATIONS TO PHASE IIPARTICIPANT ORGANIZATIONS TO PHASE II
3/50
Code Resources
14 Participating Organizations; 7 TH System Codes
NODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONNODALIZATION QUALIFICATION
4/50
Part A
Part B
NODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONNODALIZATION QUALIFICATION
5/50
Part A:
NodalizationDevelopment
NODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONNODALIZATION QUALIFICATION
6/50
Part B:
Steady State Level
NODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONNODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONResults of the Nodalization Qualification
QA and QB should be less than 1.
7/50
NODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONNODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONResults of the Nodalization Qualification
8/50
0.301
0.586
0.084
0.6620.692
0.191
0.006
0.163
0.006
0.273
0.526
0.591
0.540
0.745
0.011
0.477
0.0000.021
0.154
0.450
0.066
0.002
0.329
0.052
0.481
0.024 0.0000.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20C
EA [C
25]
IRSN
[C25
]
NR
I-2
[A20
]
GR
S [A
12]
KFK
I [A
20]
UPI
[R5]
NR
I-1
[R5]
UPC
[R5]
KIN
S [R
5]
TAEK
[R5]
PSI [
TR4]
EDO
[T97
]
JNES
[TM
55]
KA
ERI [
M23
]
Organization's Name
Glo
bal A
ccep
tabi
lity
Fact
ors
QaQb
1.443
NODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONNODALIZATION QUALIFICATIONPressures – Length Curve
9/50
0.994
0.996
0.998
1.000
1.002
1.004
1.006
1.008
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Loop Length (m)
Nor
mal
ized
Pre
ssur
e (-
)
CEA [C25] (14.916 MPa) EDOGIDRO [T97] (14.963 MPa) GRS [A12] (14.940 MPa)IRSN [C25] (14.974 MPa) JNES [TM55] (14.948 MPa) KAERI [M23] (14.940 MPa)KFKI [A20] (15.093 MPa) KINS [R5] (14.924 MPa) NRI-1 [R5] (14.967 MPa)NRI-2 [A20] (14.967 MPa) PSI [TR4] (14.951 MPa) TAEK [R5] (14.968 MPa)UPC [R5] (14.960 MPa) UPI [R5] (15.020 MPa) Experimental
HL
IN
CL
IN
PUM
P O
UT
OU
T SG
NO
ZZLE
SG O
UT
UT
TOP
SG IN
HL
OU
T
PUM
P IN
LOO
P SE
AL
TAF
BAFLP
CL
OU
T
HL
IN
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Resulting Time sequence of Events - 1
10/50
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0Time (s)
Tim
e A
fter
Exp
erim
ent I
nitia
tion
(s) CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
Experimental
Max
imum
cla
ddin
g te
mpe
ratu
re re
ache
d
Accu
mul
ator
em
ptie
d
LPIS injection terminated
Cor
e cl
addi
ng fu
lly q
uenc
hed
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Resulting Time sequence of Events - 2
11/50
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0Time (s)
Tim
e A
fter
Exp
erim
ent I
nitia
tion
(s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
Experimental
Par
tial t
op-d
own
rew
et e
nded
Pres
suriz
er e
mpt
ied
Parti
al to
p-do
wn
rew
et
initi
ated
Accu
mul
ator
A in
ject
ion
initi
atedSubcooled break flow ended in cold leg
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Resulting Time sequence of Events - 3
12/50
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4Time (s)
Tim
e A
fter
Exp
erim
ent I
nitia
tion
(s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
Experimental
Rea
ctor
scr
amm
ed
Subc
oole
d bl
owdo
wn
ende
d
DN
B
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
13/50
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: PE-PC-002
INTACT LOOP PRESSURE IN HOT LEG
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
14/50
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: PE-SGS-001
SG PRESSURE - SECONDARY SIDE
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
15/50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: PT-P120-043
ACCUMULATOR "A" PRESSURE
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgements
16/50
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: PT-P139-05-1
PRESSURIZER PRESSURE
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgements
17/50
300.00
350.00
400.00
450.00
500.00
550.00
600.00
650.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: TE-3LP-001
CORE INLET FLUID TEMPERATURE
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgements
18/50
300.00
350.00
400.00
450.00
500.00
550.00
600.00
650.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: TE-5UP-003
CORE OUTLET FLUID TEMPERATURE
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
19/50
-200.00
-100.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: FR-BL-001
BREAK FLOW RATE IN COLD LEG
Flow
Rat
e (K
g/s)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
20/50
-200.00
-100.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: FR-BL-002
BREAK FLOW RATE IN HOT LEG
Flow
Rat
e (K
g/s)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
21/50
0.00
500.00
1000.00
1500.00
2000.00
2500.00
3000.00
3500.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: Derived-ECCS
ECCS INTEGRAL FLOW RATEM
ass (
Kg)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
22/50
0.00
1000.00
2000.00
3000.00
4000.00
5000.00
6000.00
7000.00
8000.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
EXP: Derived-MASS
PRIMARY SIDE TOTAL MASS
Mas
s (K
g)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONCore Geometry and Position for the Hot Rod Cladding Temperatures
ZONE 4 = HOT ROD (RODS N° = 1)
ZONE 3 = HOT CHANNEL (RODS N° = 203)
ZONE 2 = AVERAGE CHANNEL (RODS N° = 876)
ZONE 1 = PERIPHERAL CHANNEL (RODS N° = 220)
CONTROL RODS (RODS N° = 137)
ZONE 4: HOT ROD (FUEL ASSEMBLY N° 5) - HEIGHT: 2/3
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O123456 PCTMin : 5H06-0377 (0.94 m - 974 K)89 PCTMAX = PCTRef : 5H06-02410 (0.61 m - 1078 K)1112131415
TAF
TOP
1.0 m
1.676 m 2/3 ZONE
0.4 m
BOTTOM
BAF
23/50
9
7 1
3
5 28
6
4
NJ
24/50
Maximum Linear Power Adopted
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
25/50
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
900.00
1000.00
1100.00
1200.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
PCTmax: TE-5F04-015
PCTmin: TE-5H05-002
HOT ROD TEMPERATURE (ZONE 4) - BOTTOM LEVEL
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
26/50
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
900.00
1000.00
1100.00
1200.00
1300.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
PCTmax: TE-5H06-024
PCTmin: TE-5H06-037
HOT ROD TEMPERATURE (ZONE 4) - 2/3 LEVEL
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
27/50
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
900.00
1000.00
1100.00
1200.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
PCTmax: TE-5H07-041
PCTmin: TE-5M07-062
HOT ROD TEMPERATURE (ZONE 4) - TOP LEVEL
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
28/50
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
900.00
1000.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
PCTmax: TE-2G14-011
PCTmin: TE-4F07-015
AVERAGE ROD TEMPERATURE (ZONE 2) - BOTTOM LEVEL
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
29/50
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
900.00
1000.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
PCTmax: TE-2H15-026
PCTmin: TE-4F09-026
AVERAGE ROD TEMPERATURE (ZONE 2) - 2/3 LEVEL
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments
30/50
300.00
350.00
400.00
450.00
500.00
550.00
600.00
650.00
700.00
750.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
PCTmax: TE-2H13-049
PCTmin: TE-4F09-041
AVERAGE ROD TEMPERATURE (ZONE 2) - TOP LEVEL
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
First PCT and Time of First PCT as function of Linear Power in PCT Location
31/50
900.0
950.0
1000.0
1050.0
1100.0
1150.0
1200.0
1250.0
1300.034
.85
35.3
0
35.3
3
35.3
6
35.4
9
35.4
9
35.7
5
36.0
0
36.5
7
36.8
0
37.7
7
39.2
5
40.1
0
40.6
9
Linear Power in PCT location (KW/m)
Firs
t PC
T (K
)
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
Tim
e of
Fir
st P
CT
(s)
First PCT
Time of First PCT ED
O
PSI [
TR
4]
NR
I-2
[A20
]
NR
I-1
[R5]
KIN
S [R
5]
KFK
I [A
20]
KA
ER
I [M
23]
JNE
S [T
M55
]
IRSN
[C25
]
GR
S [A
12] CE
A [C
25]
UPC
[R5]T
AE
K [R
5]
UPI
[R5]
QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
Relevant Thermal-Hydraulic Aspects
32/50
QUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONAPPLICATION OF THE FFTBM
AAINTACT PRESSURE < 0.1
AATOT < 0.4
33/50
AA Dispersion for Participants
QUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
34/50
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2P-
1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-16
P-18
P-19
P-20
Parameter's IDs
AA
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
AA Dispersion for Parameter
QUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATIONQUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION
35/50
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2C
EA [C
25]
IRSN
[C25
]
NR
I-2
[A20
]
GR
S [A
12]
KFK
I [A
20]
UPI
[R5]
NR
I-1
[R5]
UPC
[R5]
KIN
S [R
5]
TAEK
[R5]
PSI [
TR4]
EDO
GID
RO
[T97
]
JNES
[TM
55]
KA
ERI [
M23
]
Participant's IDs
AA
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9 P-10
P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-16 P-18 P-19 P-20
USER’S EFFECTUSER’S EFFECT
36/50
User effect is originated by:
A) Nodalization development;B) Interpreting the supplied (or the available) information, usually
incomplete;C) Accepting the steady state performance of the nodalization;D) Interpreting transient results, planning and performing sensitivity studies,
modifying the nodalisation and finally achieving “a reference” or “an acceptable” solution.
• Items A) and B) can be connected with the ‘global acceptabilityfactor for the nodalization development’, QA;
•The ‘global acceptability factor for the nodalization qualification at steady state level’, QB, deals with item C);
•The activities at item D) can be summarized trough the single average accuracy values (AA, and particularly AAP-1) and by the global average accuracy value (AATOT).
USER’S EFFECTUSER’S EFFECT
37/50
0.30
0.59
0.08
0.69
0.19
0.66
0.01
0.16
0.01
0.27
0.53
0.59
0.54
0.75
0.19
0.01
0.48
0.000.02
0.15
0.45
0.07
0.00
0.33
0.05
0.48
0.02 0.00
0.36
0.25
0.310.270.310.26
0.280.270.280.30
0.23
0.38
0.28
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10C
EA [C
25]
IRSN
[C25
]
NR
I-2
[A20
]
GR
S [A
12]
KFK
I [A
20]
UPI
[R5]
NR
I-1
[R5]
UPC
[R5]
KIN
S [R
5]
TAEK
[R5]
PSI [
TR4]
EDO
[T97
]
JNES
[TM
55]
KA
ERI [
M23
]
Organization's Name
Glo
bal A
ccep
tabi
lity
Fact
ors &
AA
TO
T
QaQb(AA)tot
1.44Qa , Qb
(AA)tot
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDY
38/50
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDY
39/50
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYComparison of the Results (Time Trends)
40/50
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°1: Break Area
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
UPPER PLENUM PRESSURE
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°1: Break Area
Mas
s Inv
ento
ry (%
)
PRIMARY SYSTEM MASS INVENTORY
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0
900.0
1000.0
1100.0
1200.0
1300.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°1: Break Area
Tem
pera
ture
(K
)
HOTTEST ROD SURFACE TEMPERATURE
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYComparison of the Results (Time Trends)
41/50
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55] (NOT PERFORMED)
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20] (NOT PERFORMED)
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°3: Gap Thickness
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
UPPER PLENUM PRESSURE
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55] (NOT PERFORMED)
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20] (NOT PERFORMED)
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°3: Gap Thickness
Mas
s Inv
ento
ry (%
)
PRIMARY SYSTEM MASS INVENTORY
300.0
500.0
700.0
900.0
1100.0
1300.0
1500.0
1700.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55] (NOT PERFORMED)
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20] (NOT PERFORMED)
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°3: Gap Thickness
Tem
pera
ture
(K
)
HOTTEST ROD SURFACE TEMPERATURE
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYComparison of the Results (Time Trends)
42/50
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55] (NOT PERFORMED)
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20] (NOT PERFORMED)
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°5: Fuel Conductivity
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
UPPER PLENUM PRESSURE
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55] (NOT PERFORMED)
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20] (NOT PERFORMED)
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°5: Fuel Conductivity
Mas
s Inv
ento
ry (%
)
PRIMARY SYSTEM MASS INVENTORY
300.0
500.0
700.0
900.0
1100.0
1300.0
1500.0
1700.0
1900.0
2100.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55] (NOT PERFORMED)
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20] (NOT PERFORMED)
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°5: Fuel Conductivity
Tem
pera
ture
(K
)
HOTTEST ROD SURFACE TEMPERATURE
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYComparison of the Results (Time Trends)
43/50
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°10: Maximum Linear Power
Pres
sure
(MPa
)
UPPER PLENUM PRESSURE
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°10: Maximum Linear Power
Mas
s Inv
ento
ry (%
)
PRIMARY SYSTEM MASS INVENTORY
300.0
500.0
700.0
900.0
1100.0
1300.0
1500.0
1700.0
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Time (s)
CEA [C25]
EDOGIDRO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY N°10: Maximum Linear Power
Tem
pera
ture
(K
)
HOTTEST ROD SURFACE TEMPERATURE
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDPCT and DTREFLOOD: RESULTS of Sensitivities
44/50
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDPCT Dispersion for Sensitivity Parameter
45/50
-300.0
-200.0
-100.0
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0C
EA [C
25]
IRSN
[C25
]
NR
I-2
[A20
]
GR
S [A
12]
KFK
I [A
20]
UPI
[R5]
NR
I-1
[R5]
UPC
[R5]
KIN
S [R
5]
TAEK
[R5]
PSI [
TR4]
EDO
[T97
]
JNES
[TM
55]
KA
ERI [
M23
]Participant's IDs
DPC
T (K
)
Break Area
Gap Conductivity
Gap Thickness
Presence of Crud
Fuel Conductivity
Core Pressure Drop
CCFL
Decay Power
Time of Scram
Max Linear Power
Accumulator Pressure
Accumulator Liquid Mass
Pressurizer Level
HPIS Failure
LPIS injection Time
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDPCT Dispersion for Participants
46/50
-300.0
-200.0
-100.0
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0B
reak
Are
a
Gap
Con
duct
ivity
Gap
Thi
ckne
ss
Pres
ence
of C
rud
Fuel
Con
duct
ivity
Cor
e Pr
essu
re D
rop
CC
FL
Dec
ay P
ower
Tim
e of
Scr
am
Max
Lin
ear P
ower
Acc
umul
ator
Pre
ssur
e
Acc
umul
ator
Liq
uid
Mas
s
Pres
suriz
er L
evel
HPI
S Fa
ilure
LPIS
inje
ctio
n Ti
me
Sensitivities
DPC
T (K
)
CEA [C25]EDO [T97]GRS [A12]IRSN [C25]JNES [TM55]KAERI [M23]KFKI [A20]KINS [R5]NRI-1 [R5]NRI-2 [A20]PSI [TR4]TAEK [R5]UPC [R5]UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDPCT Gaussian Distribution Curves for Sensitivity Parameter
47/50
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.010
-400.0 -200.0 0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0
DPCT (K)
Gau
ssia
n D
istr
ibut
ion
(-)
Break Area
Gap Conductivity
Gap Thickness
Presence of Crud
Fuel Conductivity
Core Pressure Drop
CCFL
Decay Power
Time of Scram
Max Linear Power
Accumulator Pressure
Accumulator Liquid Mass
Pressurizer Level
HPIS Failure
LPIS injection Time
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDtREFLOOD Dispersion for Sensitivity Parameter
48/50
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0C
EA [C
25]
IRSN
[C25
]
NR
I-2
[A20
]
GR
S [A
12]
KFK
I [A
20]
UPI
[R5]
NR
I-1
[R5]
UPC
[R5]
KIN
S [R
5]
TAEK
[R5]
PSI [
TR4]
EDO
[T97
]
JNES
[TM
55]
KA
ERI [
M23
]Participant's IDs
Dt R
EFL
OO
D (s
)
Break Area
Gap Conductivity
Gap Thickness
Presence of Crud
Fuel Conductivity
Core Pressure Drop
CCFL
Decay Power
Time of Scram
Max Linear Power
Accumulator Pressure
Accumulator Liquid Mass
Pressurizer Level
HPIS Failure
LPIS injection Time
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDtREFLOOD Dispersion for Participant
49/50
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0B
reak
Are
a
Gap
Con
duct
ivity
Gap
Thi
ckne
ss
Pres
ence
of C
rud
Fuel
Con
duct
ivity
Cor
e Pr
essu
re D
rop
CC
FL
Dec
ay P
ower
Tim
e of
Scr
am
Max
Lin
ear P
ower
Acc
umul
ator
Pre
ssur
e
Acc
umul
ator
Liq
uid
Mas
s
Pres
suriz
er L
evel
HPI
S Fa
ilure
LPIS
inje
ctio
n Ti
me
Sensitivities
Dt R
EFL
OO
D (s
)
CEA [C25]
EDO [T97]
GRS [A12]
IRSN [C25]
JNES [TM55]
KAERI [M23]
KFKI [A20]
KINS [R5]
NRI-1 [R5]
NRI-2 [A20]
PSI [TR4]
TAEK [R5]
UPC [R5]
UPI [R5]
SENSITIVITY STUDYSENSITIVITY STUDYDtREFLOOD Distribution Curves for Sensitivity Parameter
50/50
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.080
0.090
-50.0 -40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0
DPCT (K)
Gau
ssia
n D
istr
ibut
ion
(-)
Break Area
Gap Conductivity
Gap Thickness
Presence of Crud
Fuel Conductivity
Core Pressure Drop
CCFL
Decay Power
Time of Scram
Max Linear Power
Accumulator Pressure
Accumulator LiquidMassPressurizer Level
KEY RESULTS FROM BEMUSE PHASE IIIKEY RESULTS FROM BEMUSE PHASE III
50/50
KEY RESULTS FROM BEMUSE PHASE IIIKEY RESULTS FROM BEMUSE PHASE III
50/50
