Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Differentiability of convolutions,integrated semigroups of
bounded semi-variation, and theinhomogeneous Cauchy problem
Horst R. Thiemea
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Arizona State University
J. Evolution Equations 8 (2008), 283-305
apartially supported by NSF grant 0314529
– p. 1/31
Inhomogeneous Cauchy Problems
u′(t) = Au(t) + f(t), t ∈ [0, b], u(0) = 0, (1)
where A a closed linear operator in a Banach space X ,
b ∈ (0,∞) and f : [0, b] → X.
A function u : [0, b] → X is called a classical solution of (1) if
u is continuously differentiable on [0, b],
u(t) ∈ D(A) for all t ∈ [0, b],
and u satisfies equation (1).
– p. 2/31
C0-Semigroups
Travis (1981)
A is the generator of a C0-semigroup T :
(1) has a classical solution for every continuousf : [0, b] → X if and only if
the semigroup T is of bounded semi-variation.
Quite restrictive (Travis): implies
semigroup is analytic
A is bounded if X is reflexive or an abstract L space.
– p. 3/31
Where to go from here
smaller classes of inhomogeneities f :
Crandall, Pazy (1969) Hölder continuous.
Webb (1977) continuous and of bounded variation.
Sell, You (2002) sufficient conditions.
Alternative: weaker notion of solution
– p. 4/31
Integral solutions
If f ∈ L1(0, b,X), a function u is an integral solution of (1):
u is continuous on [0, b],∫ t
0u(s)ds ∈ D(A) for all t ∈ [0, b],
u(t) = A
∫ t
0u(s)ds+
∫ t
0f(s)ds, t ∈ [0, b].
Every classical solution is an integral solution.
– p. 5/31
Hille-Yosida Operators
There exist M ≥ 1, ω ∈ R such that (ω,∞) is contained inthe resolvent set of A and
‖(λ− A)−n‖ ≤M(λ− ω)−n, λ > ω, n = 1, 2, . . . (2)
Theorem [Da Prato, Sinestrari, 1987]. Let A be aHille-Yosida operator, 0 < b <∞.
For all f ∈ L1(0, b,X), there exist a unique integral solutionu of (1).
Estimate
‖u(t)‖ ≤M
∫ t
0eω(t−s)‖f(s)‖ds, 0 ≤ t ≤ b.
– p. 6/31
Characterization
Proposition. The following are equivalent for a closed linearoperator A in a Banach space X.
1. A is Hille-Yosida operator.
2. A is the generator of an integrated semigroup T that is
Lipschitz continuous on some interval [0, b], b > 0.
Arendt (1987), Kellermann&Hieber (1989)
– p. 7/31
Integrated Semigroups
Focus on integrated semigroups rather than C0-semigroups.
Arendt, Batty, Hieber, Neubrander (2000)
T is a strongly continuous operator family T = {T (t); t ≥ 0},
T (t)T (r) =
∫ t+r
0T (s)ds−
∫ t
0T (s)ds−
∫ r
0T (s)ds, t, r ≥ 0,
T (0) = 0.
Example: T (t) =
∫ t
0S(r)dr, with C0-semigroup S.
Non-degenerate: T (t)x = 0 for all t > 0 occurs only for x = 0.
– p. 8/31
Generator
If T is exponentially bounded, definition via Laplacetransform,
(λ− A)−1 = λ
∫ ∞
0e−λtT (t)dt
for sufficiently large λ > 0.
Otherwise (Th 1990): if x, y ∈ X,
x ∈ D(A), y = Ax ⇐⇒ T (t)x−tx =
∫ t
0T (s)y ds ∀t ≥ 0.
– p. 9/31
Integrated solutions
Variation of constants formula, convolution
(T ∗ f)(t) =
∫ t
0T (t− s)f(s)ds.
Proposition. Let A be the generator of an integratedsemigroup T , f ∈ L1(0, b,X).
Then v = T ∗ f is the unique solution of
v(t) = A
∫ t
0v(s)ds+
∫ t
0(t− s)f(s)ds, 0 ≤ t ≤ b.
Can we differentiate?
– p. 10/31
Semivariation
Hönig (1975). The semi-variation of T on an interval [a, b] is
V∞(T ; a, b) = sup∥
∥
∥
k∑
j=1
[
T (tj) − T (tj−1)]
xj
∥
∥
∥,
where the supremum is taken over
all partitions P = {t0, . . . , tk} of [a, b], a = t0 < · · · < tk = b,
and all elements x1, . . . , xk ∈ X, ‖xj‖ ≤ 1, k ∈ N.
If V∞(T ; a, b) <∞, we will say that T is of boundedsemi-variation on [a, b].
– p. 11/31
Semi-p-variation
A larger net (Magal Ruan, 2007):
The semi-p-variation Vp(T ; a, b) is defined by the sameformula as before ,
and the supremum is taken over all partitions P (as before)
but x1, . . . , xk ∈ X with
k∑
j=1
(tj − tj−1)‖xj‖p ≤ 1.
– p. 12/31
Differentiability of convolutions
Theorem. The following hold for a strongly continuousfamily T = {T (t); 0 ≤ t ≤ b} of bounded linear operatorsbetween Banach spaces X, Y :
(a) T ∗ f is continuously differentiable on [0, b] for allf ∈ C(0, b,X) if and only if T is of boundedsemi-variation on [0, b].
(b) If 1 ≤ p <∞, T ∗ f is continuously differentiable on[0, b] for all f ∈ Lp(0, b,X) if and only if T is of boundedsemi-p-variation on [0, b] and T (0) = 0.
In (a), C(0, b,X) can be replaced by R(0, b,X), the space ofregulated functions.
– p. 13/31
Tools
=⇒: Closed graph theorem
⇐=: Stieltjes convolution.
If T is strongly continuous and if T (0) = 0 or g is continuous,then T ∗ g is continuously differentiable on [0, b], and
(T ∗ g)′(t) = (T ⋆ g)(t) + T (0)g(t).
where
(T ⋆ g)(t) =
∫ t
0T (ds)g(t− s).
Estimatesup
t∈[0,b]‖(T ⋆ g)(t)‖ ≤ Vp(T ; 0, b) ‖g‖p.
– p. 14/31
Back to the Cauchy problem
Theorem. Let A be the generator of an integratedsemigroup T , 0 < b <∞.
(a) If T is of bounded semi-variation on [0, b], then forevery f ∈ R(0, b,X) there exists a unique integralsolution u of (1) on [0, b], u = (T ∗ f)′ = T ⋆ f .
(b) T is of bounded semi-variation on [0, b]if for every f ∈ C(0, b,X) there exists an integralsolution u of (1) on [0, b].
Estimate leading to semilinear theory
supt∈[0,b]
‖(T ⋆ f)(t)‖ ≤ V∞(T ; 0, b) supt∈[0,b]
‖f(t)‖.
– p. 15/31
Cauchy problem in Lp
Theorem. Let A be the generator of an integratedsemigroup T , 1 ≤ p <∞.
Then T is of bounded semi-p-variation on [0, b]
if and only if,
for every f ∈ Lp(0, b,X), there exists an integral solution u of(1) on [0, b].
The solution u is uniquely determined by f ,u = (T ∗ f)′ = T ⋆ f .
Duality characterization in Magal&Ruan (2007).
– p. 16/31
(q-) variation
The variation of a function g : [a, b] → X∗ is
v(g; a, b) = supk∑
j=1
∥
∥g(tj) − g(tj−1)∥
∥,
where the supremum is taken over all partitionsP = {t0, . . . , tk} with a = t0 < · · · < tk = b,
and the q-variation is
vq(g; a, b) = sup
(
k∑
j=1
∥
∥g(tj) − g(tj−1)∥
∥
q
(tj − tj−1)q−1
)1/q
.
– p. 17/31
The duality connection
T ∗ is called to be of bounded strong (q-)variation if T ∗(·)y∗ isof bounded (q-)variation for each y∗ ∈ Y ∗.
Operator families of bounded strong (p-) variation arestudied by Th&Voßeler (2002) and Voßeler (2000).
Proposition. T is of bounded semi-variation if and only ifT ∗ is of bounded strong variation.
If 1 < p, q <∞ and1
p+
1
q= 1,
T is of bounded semi-p-variation
if and only if
T ∗ is of bounded strong q-variation.
– p. 18/31
More on semi-p-variation
Lemma. (a) If T is of bounded semi-p-variation, then it isHölder continuous with exponent 1/p and
‖T (t) − T (s)‖ ≤ Vp(T ; a, b)|t− s|1/p.
(b) T is of bounded semi-1-variation if and only if it isLipschitz continuous, and
V1(T ; a, b) = supa≤s<t≤b
‖T (t) − T (s)‖
t− s.
– p. 19/31
Characterization of Hille-Yosida Ops.
Theorem. The following are equivalent for a closed linearoperator A in a Banach space X.
1. A is a Hille-Yosida operator.
2. (i) For each x ∈ X, there exists a unique integralsolution of
u′ = Au+ x on R+, u(0) = 0,
which is exponentially bounded.
(ii) There exists some b ∈ (0,∞) such that, for eachf ∈ L1(0, b,X), there exists a unique integralsolution u of (1) on [0, b].
– p. 20/31
Example
Let p > 1, 0 < α < p−1p , X = Lp[0, 1],
(Af)(x) = −f ′(x) +α
xf(x).
D(A): absolutely continuous functions f on [0, 1]with f(0) = 0 and f ′ ∈ Lp[0, 1],
Arendt (1987): A generates the integrated semigroup
[T (t)f ](x) =
∫ t
0xα(x− s)−αf(x− s)H(x− s)ds, x ∈ [0, 1].
H is the Heaviside function. T is not a C0-semigroup.Since D(A) is dense, A is not a Hille-Yosida operator.
– p. 21/31
Example cont.
The dual family on Lq[0, 1], 1q + 1
p = 1, is given by
[T ∗(t)g](x) =
∫ t
0(x+ s)αx−αg(x+ s)H(1 − x− s)ds,
T ∗ is the integrated semigroup generated by A∗.
T ∗ is of locally bounded strong q-variation.
T is of locally bounded semi-p-variation.
Notice: X is an ordered Banach space,T and T ∗ are increasing,A and A∗ have positive resolvents.
– p. 22/31
Age-structure
Find u(t, a) ∈ X, t time, a age,
X Banach space, additional structure (space e.g.)
ut + ua = B(a)u+ g(t, a), t > 0, a > 0,
u(t, 0) = h(t), t > 0,
u(0, a) = u0(a), a > 0.
u(t, ·) ∈ Lp(R+, X), 1 ≤ p <∞.
B(a) closed linear operators associated with anevolutionary system {U(a, s); a ≥ s}.
– p. 23/31
A larger space
X = X × Lp(R+, X), X0 = {0} × Lp(R+, X).
B(0, φ) =(
−φ(0), −φ′ +B(·)φ)
.
Set v(t) = (0, u(t, ·)), Cauchy problem
v′(t) = Bv(t) + (h(t), g(t, ·)).
B is a Hille-Yosida operator if p = 1 (Th 1989),
and the generator of an integrated semigroup of locallybounded semi-p-variation if p > 1 (Magal&Ruan 2007).
– p. 24/31
Evolution semigroups
Let U = {U(t, s); 0 ≤ s ≤ t <∞} be the forwardevolutionary system associated with B(t).
We define the associated (Howland) evolution semigroupon Y = Lp(R+, X), 1 ≤ p <∞, by
[S(t)φ](a) =
{
U(a, a− t)φ(a− t); 0 ≤ t ≤ a
0; 0 ≤ a < t
}
, φ ∈ Y.
Integrated semigroup T (t)(x, φ) = (0, ψ(t)),
ψ(t)(a) = H(t− a)U(a, 0)x+
∫ t
0[S(r)φ](a)dt.
– p. 25/31
Perturbation Theory
Generalization of a result by Da Prato and Grisvard (1975).
Theorem. Let S = {S(t); t ≥ 0} be a C0-SG, generator A,
T = {T (t)} an ISG, generator B.
Assume that T is of locally bounded semi-variation andthat T and S commute, i.e. T (t)S(r) = S(r)T (t) for allt, r ≥ 0. Then
T̃ (t)x =
∫ t
0T (dr)S(r)x
defines an ISG of locally bounded semi-variation whosegenerator extends A+B (with domain D(A) ∩D(B)).T̃ commutes with both T and S.
– p. 26/31
commuting families
If 0 < b <∞ and T is of bounded semi-p-variation on [0, b],so is T̃ and
Vp(T̃ ; 0, b) ≤ mVp(T ; 0, b)
m = sup0≤t≤b
‖S(t)‖.
Da Prato and Grisvard (1975): p = 1
– p. 27/31
Bounded perturbations
Theorem. Let A be the generator of an ISG T which is oflocally bounded semi-(p-)variation and the linear operatorB : D(A) → X satisfy
‖B‖ = sup{‖Bx‖;x ∈ D(A), ‖x‖ ≤ 1} <∞.
If T is of locally bounded semi-variation, assume inaddition that ‖B‖V∞(T, 0, b) < 1 for some b > 0.Then A+ B generates an ISG V of locally bounded semi-(p-)variation which solves the equations
V (t)x− T (t)x =
∫ t
0T (ds)B̄V (t− s)x =
∫ t
0V (ds)B̄T (t− s)x,
where B is the extension of B to D(A).
– p. 28/31
Summary
(CP) u′ = Au+ f(t) on [0, b], u(0) = 0.
(CP) has integral solutions for all continuous(regulated) f if and only if A generates an ISG ofbounded semi-variation.
(CP) has integral solutions for all f ∈ Lp if and only ifA generates an ISG of bounded semi-p-variation.
the generator A of an ISG is a Hille-Yosida operator ifand only if there is some b > 0 such that (CP) hasintegral solutions for all f ∈ L1.
– p. 29/31
Perturbations
ISGs of locally bounded semi-(p-)variation arepreserved under bounded additive perturbations oftheir generators.
The commutative sum A+ B of generators of aC0-semigroup and of an ISG of locally boundedsemi-(p-)variation generates an ISG of the same type.
– p. 30/31
Examples
ISGs of bounded semi-p-variation occur naturally inage-structured population models (cf. Magal Ruan,2007)
where, at any time, the age-distribution of thepopulation is a vector-valued function in Lp(R+, X).
Natural examples of resolvent positive operatorsgenerate ISGs of bounded semi-(p-)variation.
– p. 31/31