18
Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma

Experience

Page 2: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Need for Local Epi Workgroups

• Evolving public health field• Shift to empowering communities

Page 3: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Purpose of the REOWs

• Replicate State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup

• Assess, • Prioritize • Help advise community coalitions on data

findings that support the selection of appropriate prevention strategies

Page 4: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Adult Alcohol Consumption, 2010 BRFSS

Page 5: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

REOW Membership

• Local/State Health Agency• Other Prevention Agency• Non-Clinical Treatment Professionals• Community/Social Services• Law Enforcement/Highway Patrol• Education• Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics• Oklahoma Juvenile Affairs• Healthcare/Professionals/Pharmacy• Youth• Oklahoma ABLE Commission• Other

Page 6: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

REOW Tasks

SPF SIG Process• Assessment• Capacity• Planning• Implementation• Evaluation

Role of REOW

Page 7: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization of Substances and Communities

• SEOW identified underage drinking and nonmedical use of prescription drugs for SPF SIG; underage drinking, marijuana, adult binge drinking, methamphetamine, alcohol use during pregnancy, inhalants, and nonmedical prescription drugs for the Block Grant

• SEOW made recommendation of priority and community

• REOW was tasked to decide which priority and which community

Page 8: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization of Substances and Communities Cont.

• Workbook created• Assessment done in 3 phases:1. Collecting, analyzing, and prioritizing consumption

and consequence data2. Collecting, analyzing, and prioritizing around

intermediate variables relegated to the chosen priority- community capacity and readiness were also assessed

3. RPC and REOW Coordinator compiled results and wrote an epi profile for the region

Page 9: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization Results

• SEOW’s findings confirmed• 12 Regions selected nonmedical use of

prescription drugs for the SPF SIG, 5 chose underage drinking

• If they did not chose nonmedical use of prescription drugs for the SPF SIG, they chose it in at least one of their counties for the Block Grant

Page 10: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization Results Cont.Region 1 NCBH Woods Underage Drinking

Woodward Non-medical Use of Prescription DrugsSPF-SIG Texas Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 2 Preventionworkz Garfield Underage DrinkingLogan Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs

SPF-SIG Garfield Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 3 OSU PANOK Osage Underage DrinkingKay Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs

SPF-SIG Payne Underage Drinking

Region 4 ROCMND Ottawa Underage DrinkingDelaware Underage Drinking

Alcohol Use Among Pregnant WomenSPF-SIG Rogers Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 5 Cherokee Nation Cherokee Adult Binge DrinkingWagoner Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs

SPF-SIG Cherokee Underage Drinking

Page 11: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization Results Cont.

Region 6 SOIC McCurtain Non-medical Use of Presciption DrugsMeth

Le Flore Non-medical Use of Presciption DrugsSPF-SIG McCurtain Underage Drinking

Region 7 Neighbors, McAlester Atoka Non-medical Use of Prescription DrugsPittsburg Underage Drinking

SPF-SIG Pittsburg Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 8 OU Cleveland Underage DrinkingNorman (Main Street & Campus Corner) Adult Binge Drinking

SPF-SIG Cleveland Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 9 OSU Tri-County Creek Underage DrinkingOkmulgee Adult Binge Drinking

SPF-SIG Creek Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Page 12: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization Results Cont.

Region 10 WMPN, Ardmore Bryan MarijuanaCarter Underage Drinking

Non-medical Use of Prescription DrugsSPF-SIG Pontotoc Non-Medical Use of Prescription DrugsRegion 11 WMPN, Lawton Comanche Underage Drinking

Stephens Non-medical Use of Prescription DrugsSPF-SIG Comanche Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 12 Red Rock, Clinton Caddo Non-medical Use of Prescription DrugsBeckham Alcohol Use Among Pregnant Women

SPF-SIG Caddo Underage Drinking

Region 13 Red Rock, Yukon Canadian Underage DrinkingAdult Binge Drinking

Grady Underage DrinkingSPF-SIG Canadian Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Page 13: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Prioritization Results Cont.

Region 14 Gateway Pottawatomie Underage DrinkingOkfuskee Meth

SPF-SIG Pottawatomie Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 15 Neighbors, Muskogee Muskogee Adult Binge DrinkingMcIntosh Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs

SPF-SIG Muskogee Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Region 16 Eagle Ridge Oklahoma City Adult Binge Drinking Oklahoma City Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs

SPF-SIG Oklahoma Underage Drinking

Region 17 TCCHD City of Tulsa Adult Binge DrinkingCity of Tulsa Underage Drinking

SPF-SIG

Tulsa Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs

Page 14: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Challenges and Barriers

• REOWs vary region by region• Shifting the focus of prevention framework• A REOW candidates did not exist in every

region• Membership was hard to establish• Participation of REOW members was not

always promised

Page 15: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Challenges and Barriers Cont.

• Inconsistent attendance• Suppressed, missing, invalid, unreliable, or

insensitive data• Inconsistencies in data collection methods• In some cases, no local data collection system

existed at all• A lack of infrastructure for sharing data

among state agencies

Page 16: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Successes

• Identified and establish relations with different agencies and individuals

• Develop an understanding and appreciation of the data collection process

• Empowerment • Developed systematic ongoing monitoring system• Identified the gaps and limitations of community-

level data• Identified and engage stakeholders in their

communities

Page 17: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

The Data Query System

Page 18: Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience

Contact Information

Young Onuorah, MPA, CPSSenior Prevention Program ManagerOK Dept. of Mental Health and Substance Abuse [email protected]

Jamie Piatt, MPHSEOW CoordinatorOK Dept. of Mental Health and Substance Abuse [email protected]