4
J , . ii s ). ,IT . P')- '·R. I. \. a inn I f.' 01 c "lIl 1 Desiing piping for avi flow Gas entrained in liquid flowing by means of gravity from a vessel can reduce the outlet pipe's capacity and cause flow to surge cyclically. These problems Gin be avoided by carefully designing for either full-liquid or two-phase flow. P. D. His, Imperial Chemical hulllsiries PLC o Entrainment curtails l iquid gravity Bow from vessels hy raising the pressure drop (abovc that for single-phasc flow) through the outlet piping, and reducin g the static head available for overcoming li It pressure drop. A simi- lar problem can arise wher. a liquid is near its boiling point, or contains dissolved gas, especially if the absolute pressure at any point in the piping ralls below atmos- pheric pressure, as occurs in a syphon. l:onsider the Glse of liquid flowing from the bottom of an absorption column through a pipe that has been si zed for full liquid flow (Fig. I). When the liquid level in the column is low enough, the liquid cntrains gas (Fig. la). The resulting increase in pressure drop and reduction of head restrict the !1ow- rate. and the liquid level rises (Fig. Ib). Eventually, the level rises high enough to stop entrainment (Fig. \ c). Howcver, gas stilI in the oULlet pi pe causes I hc Icvel to lIt.inlle to rise lllllil the gas is all swept out (Fig. Id). Now, the outlet pipe is running fllllllow (as was assulI led in the design), but the static head, beming higher t han as assumcd, creates excessive i 1ow. which causes the level to (i111 until cntrainmelll ou:urs again and the cycle is repeated (Fig. I e). Such oscillations can be severe. d ependin g on s y slem CI>ll1etry. III one case, the peak !low from a t ank ex- ceeded the ca;)acity of the vacuum breaker sunic iently 1 colla pse it. Genel ex p ression for liquid flowrate In this anide, liquid lIowrates are genell y ex p ressed ill terms or a di mensionless superficial volumetric flux. }to which is defined by: Jt = 4/t2(d)1/2 ( I) lIere. 0. is the volumetric !lowrate; d is the pipe I. D.; ,lIId g is the gravitational acceleration. Eq. (\) is si mi lal· to IlIe Froude number. It is used in prefercnce 10 the I'mude number, because the lalter's dclinilion I'arics. depending O circulllstances. All eq ll atiolls in I his articlc arc in consistent units. Designing for gravity flow Three a p proaches the desi g n of gravity tl rai nage <\slems arc possible: I. For full !low, with the outlet pipin g size based on single-phase criteria. 2. For self�velltillg, with the liquid velocity in the outlet pipe kept 101 enough to allow gas to now counter- currently to the liquid. 3. For gas entrainment, but with the system desi gned to accommodate it. In g eneral . the first approach can be expected to result in the smallest pipe diameter and should be given prefer- ence. However, in many instances, it is not possible to ensure full pipe now-in which case, the alternatives may have 10 hc adopted. Designing for flooded flow To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design , the liquid level in the \"esscl must always be high enough to keep I he pipe inlet floodcd. To achicvc this. some form of COllt rol will he necessarv , such as via a cOlltrol valve (Fig. 2a) !- a vert icalloop i� the piping (Fig. 2b). If the latter is used, a syphon break will be necessary (shown in Fig. 2b), and the piping c1ownstl'eam of the sypholl break cannot be assumed to run f looded because gas is likely t o J enlrained at the syphon break. or course. either arrangement will increase the system pres- sure drop and reduce somewhat the benelits of the lIoodecl-f1ow design. Single-phase criteria Gll1 be appl i ed to desig nin g sec- tions of outlet piping in which flow can be expected to be nooded. I I' pi pi ng that is certain to be Hooded is pre· ceded by a self-venting section, the self-venting section's minimulIl Icngth should be n.5 l. to provide for gas dis- engagement, beforc the piping is reduced for single- phasc flow (Fig. 2c). rite criteria for Ilooded outlets are Eg. (2) for outlets frolll the base of vessels. and Eg. (3) for outlets from the side of vess�: . < I.()(hld) :h > 0_892(0.f/gdJo. 25 (2) Here, is Ihe liq uid de p th in the vessel away fm the t'egion of the outlet. .J r < (2h)t/2:h > 0.81 I (0)2Igd" (3) Here. It is the liquid height above the top of the outlet away from the region of the outlet . (:II·,�IH:"t. :N(:IN'·.FI�IN(: SFI'TEtHER �I. IllIn 111

Designing piping for gravity flow - …docshare04.docshare.tips/files/17981/179815473.pdf · Designing piping for gravity flow ... To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Designing piping for gravity flow - …docshare04.docshare.tips/files/17981/179815473.pdf · Designing piping for gravity flow ... To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design,

J , . ii i-

s

).

,IT

I .....

P')-

'·R.

,I. .\. a linn ,I

,I If.' 01 Ic\\' II"lIl

1

Designing piping for gravity flow Gas entrained in liquid flowing by means of gravity from

a vessel can reduce the outlet pipe's capacity and cause flow to surge cyclically. These problems Gin be avoided by carefully designing for either full-liquid or two-phase flow.

P. D. Hills, Imperial Chemical hulllsiries PLC

o Entrainment curtails liquid gravity Bow from vessels hy raising the pressure drop (abovc that for single-phasc flow) through the outlet piping, and reducing the static head available for overcoming li It. pressure drop. A simi­

lar problem can arise wher. a liquid is near its boiling point, or contains dissolved gas, especially if the absolute pressure at any point in the piping ralls below atmos­pheric pressure, as occurs in a syphon.

l:onsider the Glse of liquid flowing from the bottom of an absorption column through a pipe that has been sized for full liquid flow (Fig. I).

When the liquid level in the column is low enough, the liquid cntrains gas (Fig. la). The resulting increase in pressure drop and reduction of head restrict the !1ow­rate. and the liquid level rises (Fig. Ib). Eventually, the level rises high enough to stop entrainment (Fig. \ c). Howcver, gas stilI in the oULlet pipe causes I hc Icvel to C<JlIt.inlle to rise lllllil the gas is all swept out (Fig. Id). Now, the outlet pipe is running fllllllow (as was assulI led in the design), but the static head, becoming higher tha n \\'as assumcd, creates excessive i1ow. which causes the level to (i111 until cntrainmelll ou:urs again and the cycle is repeated (Fig. I e).

Such oscillations can be severe. depending on syslem I!;CI>ll1etry. III one case, the peak !low from a tank ex­ceeded the ca;)acity of the vacuum breaker suniciently 1.0 colla pse it.

General expression for liquid flow rate In this anide, liquid lIowrates are generally expressed

ill terms or a dimensionless superficial volumetric flux. }to which is defined by:

Jt = 4Q,/7Tlt2(!5d)1/2 ( I) lIere. 0. is the volumetric !lowrate; d is the pipe I. D.; ,lIId g is the gravitational acceleration. Eq. (\) is sim i lal· to IlIe Froude number. It is used in prefercnce 10 the I'mude number, because the lalter's dclinilion I'arics. depending Oil circulllstances. All eqllatiolls in Ihis articlc arc in consistent units.

Designing for gravity flow Three approaches to the design of gravity tlrainage

<\slems arc possible :

I. For full !low, with the outlet piping size based on single-phase criteria.

2. For self�velltillg, with the liquid velocity in the outlet pipe kept 101\' enough to allow gas to now counter­currently to the liquid.

3. For gas entrainment, but with the system designed to accommodate it.

In general . the first approach can be expected to result in the smallest pipe diameter and should be given prefer­ence. However, in many instances, it is not possible to ensure full pipe now-in which case, the alternatives may have 1.0 hc adopted.

Designing for flooded flow To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design ,

the liquid level in the \"esscl must always be high enough to keep I he pipe inlet floodcd. To achicvc this. some form of COllt rol will he necessarv , such as via a cOlltrol valve (Fig. 2a) 01- a vert icalloop i� the piping (Fig. 2b). If the latter is used, a syphon break will be necessary (shown in Fig. 2b), and the piping c1ownstl'eam of the sypholl break cannot be assumed to run flooded because gas is likely to JlC enlrained at the syphon break. or course. either arrangement will increase the system pres­sure drop and reduce somewhat the benelits of the lIoodecl-f1ow design.

Single-phase criteria Gll1 be applied to designing sec­tions of outlet piping in which flow can be expected to be nooded. I I' piping that is certain to be Hooded is pre· ceded by a self-venting section, the self-venting section's minimulIl Icngth should be n.5 lll. to provide for gas dis­engagement, beforc the piping is reduced for single­phasc flow (Fig. 2c).

rite criteria for Ilooded outlets are Eg. (2) for outlets frolll the base of vessels. and Eg. (3) for outlets from the side of vesscl.�:

.It < I.()(hld)�:h > 0_892(0.f/gdJo.25 (2) Here, It is Ihe liquid depth in the vessel away from the t'egion of the outlet.

.Jr < (2hld)t/2:h > 0.81 I (0)2Igd" (3) Here. It is the liquid height above the top of the outlet away from the region of the outlet .

(:III-·,�IH:"t. t-:N(:IN'·.F.I�IN(: SF.I'TE!\tHER �I. IllIn 111

Page 2: Designing piping for gravity flow - …docshare04.docshare.tips/files/17981/179815473.pdf · Designing piping for gravity flow ... To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design,

CRAVITY·U.OW PIP INC

Oesigning unflooded (self-venting) piping Side-outlet piping-Coming off li'om the side of a vessel,

piping should be sized such that: t:::Yih. Jt. < O.3:d > (4Qt./(O.31Tgl12}'fJ.4 o·'t (4)

d.: ::: �1G. This ensures that the line will run less than half full at its entrance. The level in the vessel away from the outlet will be less than 0.8 d above the base of the line. The capacity of such an overflow line can be found from Curve 1 in Fig. 3.

o

q o . o .

o

Gas l a. Gas is entrained in outlet,

restricting flow. Liquid flow in exceeds flow out, and level rises.

��o�o�.�o��o�.---�

Gas

Gas

J

b. Higher liquid level reduces entrainment, but flow out is still restricted. Level continues to rise.

Near-lwriZlmtal piping-If such a pipeline. will run on�y

partially full, it must be inclined to provide the statrc. head to overcome friction losses. A minimum slope qi

1:40 is recolllmended. To avoid having the liquid carrying gas forward, ade­

quate free area mllst be left in the pipe to al\?w �as �o I

pass backward. For pipes up to 200 mm dla., hqUlU .

depths should not be more than half the pipe diameter. For larger pipes, depths up to three-fourths of the diam­eter may be possible.

Gas

J

Gas �

d. Liquid level now stops gas flow in. All gas has been swept from the outlet piping, and a syphon is formed. Single-phase flow in out· let piping is helped by higher head. Now, outlet flow exceeds inlet flow, and level falls rapidly.

e. Entrainment starts again. Liquid flow is still high, helped by syphon. Built·up gas pressure in inlet pipe is released in a surge. System is returning to first stage.

c. liquid level is now higb=n�o�u",h"-- ___ --L"""': to prevent further entrainment. However, some bubbles are still trapped in outlet, restricting flow. Level continues to rise. Gas inlet flow is beginning to be choked.

Entrainment causes surging by increasing pressure drop in piping and lowering head in vessel Fig. 1

C!HEMICAL ENGlNEF.RINC SEPTEMBER 5. /98:1

Page 3: Designing piping for gravity flow - …docshare04.docshare.tips/files/17981/179815473.pdf · Designing piping for gravity flow ... To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design,

�I-----I ---------------...,.

T

a. Control valve maintains level in vessel

I I I I I I I

_ --Syphon break

r.=====.::::::i .... -- Un flooded ...; -7 section

1/

b. Hydraulic loop ensures minimum level

Designs ensure flooded flow in outlet piping

I I )

I I I

Fig. 2

When flow in a partially filled pipe is uniform (i.e., constant depth), the energy lost through friction is bal· anced by the potential-energy change clue to the in�na­tion of the pipe. In sllch a case. the mean vel{)cit�·, FL, is related to the inclination and the depth of !lowing liquid by Eq. (5) [1]:

VL = (32gmi)1I2Iog{[e/I4.8mJ + [0.2211Im(g"mi)I/�]} (5) Here, m is the hydraulic mean depth (flow area/wetted perimeter); i is the inclination of the pipe from the hori­zontal; € is the pipe roughness; and v is the kinematic viscosity.

Fig. 3 gives the volumetric capacity for established 110w in half-full and three-quarters-full rough and smooth pipes. The curves were calculated via Eq. (5) for pipes of slope 1:40 and a l1uid having a kinematic viscosity of /0-0 JJ12/S (e.g., water at 20°C). The absolute roughness used for the rough pipes was 0.25 mm (moderately rusty mild steel). The results are not very sensitive to liquid viscosity. The capacity of a rough pipe is increased by about 1 % ('0[, a totally inviscid liquid, and is only reduced by about 10% {'o[' a liquid having a kinematic viscosit}' 0(' 10-5 m�/s. Thus, the Fig. 3 water curves can be sale!}' used l'or most liquids.

Unflooded.' section \

I

\ \

( I I

I r \, [ >0.5 m

c. Self·venting section precedes flooded piping

1,000

500

200

100 <::: E 50 2]-� 3: .9 L.L.

20

10

5

2

r--

I 11

:f, ft

I . !t'::::i�stabl;shed Curve 3IA-3I4.full ,o/ugh p.pel�"'" - +-flow

� �,<J'-:S

'4 / �I

� . ,

",' 'S' I il�'/ / 0° • "-r- � .,.,�� �,Q I 0" .§- � I I V ",.01' /. � �o; �. ' �.., / .... \� .§:o ,\0 '(\\.�'b�.

':'-1' /e.,q, ,\,,;� I '\ /7' f)\'fI'- 4,(, / r �'/(l "v'?- � '" ",.

::..� ..}(" ., G .. J L .'- / ,

1// / / I

"f 'J / I h / \ I

If / I, V I I

II L I I !

II II I I I

/ I !

i i

l I I

I I I i I I ! I

",

I

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Pipe dia., mm

Capacities for established flows in unflooded pipelines Fig. 3

CHEMICAl. F.NGI�EERING SF.ITn'MIlF.R >. I"R:. II:.!

!EE PAZ.

j i

, --,-:

V

I I , ,

\ J

! � .-j I

. ! ; ! , : i , I

I I I

45'

Page 4: Designing piping for gravity flow - …docshare04.docshare.tips/files/17981/179815473.pdf · Designing piping for gravity flow ... To avoid gas entrainment in the full-pipe-flow design,

I' I i I

I'

Ii: i' I , '1 I' . . . ; 1:: /\

The initial velocity in an o tltlet line dcsigned to Hill half full is less than the equilibrium velocity in a pipe having a slope of 1 :40. As the liquid accelerates down the pipe. the liquid depth diminishes with distance to that of the depth corresponding to the established Ilow at a given flowrate. To maintain a constant relative depth. a tapered pipe would be necessary. As this is impractical. reducing the pipe diameter stepwise is recommended. Tapered reducers should be installed to avoid sudden disturbances in the !low.

For long lengths of pipes. the following design ap­proach is suggested:

1. Size the outlet line on the side of a vessel for Jt =

0.3 (Curve 1 of Fig. 3). If the resulting pipe size is not standard. choose the standard size higher thall the calcu­lated size. Continue the size so choscn for at least tell pipe diameters.

2. Determine the pipe diameter corresponding to half-full established flow for the required Ilowrate (using Curve 2A or 2B of Fig. 3). Again. select the nearest s tandard pipe size higher than the calculated size .

3. Reduce the pipe diameter from the outlet size to thc established-flow size. using an eccentric reducer that will not change the slope of the bottom of the pipe. Prefera­bly. the reducer's minimum length should be twice that of the upstream pipe diameter.

If the foregoing procedure is followed for pipes of I: 40 slope, the liquid depth after the reducer will not exceed 75% of the pipe diameter.

For long. large-diameter (>200 mm) inclined pipes, it may be worth considering a second reduction down to the size corresponding to an established-Oow relative depth of 75%. This reduction can be made after 50 pipe diameters (see Curve 3A or :m of Fig. 3).

For short pipe runs, the additional cost of tapered re­ducers-especially if of a gentle angle, as recolllll1emled (which may lIot be standard) . or of lined pipe-may ex­ceed the savings in going (() smaller-diameter piping. In such cases. the entire length of the pipe should be of the large size.

Self-venting flow in vertical pipes Liqliid llowing vertically clown does so as an annular

!11m. In such cases. low superficial \ clocities are necessary to avoid gas being sucked down with the liqu id. Silll,;­son's suggestion or basing pipe outlet diameters 1)1) a lim­iting Froude number o/" 0.3 is recommended [2J:

Jt.< 0.3 «l) Eg. «(j) being the same as Eg. (4). pipe diameters can be detemlined rrom Curve 1 in Fig. :1.

This approach should be adopted when gas entrain ­ment is to be avoided. as when a vertical pipe extends into a vessel to below the liquid surface. or ",hen the dowllStream piping must be designed li)r flooded !lO\\!. Smaller pipe than that dictated bv Eq. (fi) can be ex­pected to cause surging.

Self-venting flow in complex systems Little infi)rtnation is available on lInl1oo<ied (low in

svstems that include hcnds. especially for !low changes from vertical to nearlv horizontal. and \'ice versa. Lim­ited evidence suggests t.ha t e\'en if the pipe diameter is

114

chosen lur self-vcnting" 1I0w (as in a prior section OIl de­signing unlloocled piping), entrainment and surging may still occur due to the effects of the bends. The de­sign recolllmendations now given are. therefore. offered only tentatively.

Bends in the horizontal (or nearly horizontal) plane will not necessarily cause problems if the 1: 40 slope is continued with the bend and the bend is gentle (prefera­bly , the radius equaling five diameters) .

[n the vertical plane. the number of bends should be limited as mllch as possible. Gently sloping piping is preferable to vertical runs. The radius of bends should be at least live diameters.

Bends from. or to. venical sections should be sized as fi)r vertical pipillg. Inclined piping following a vertical section (<In he sized ()!. half-full established !low \'ia the criteria ('or near-horizontal piping in the previous discll5-sion on designing unlloodcd (self-venting) piping. Changes in diame ter should be made by means of ;\s\'m­metric tapered reduccrs whose lengths are equal to twice the larger diameter. and which are installed so that the bottom of the reducer has a slope equal to that or the piping at either end.

If entrainment is acceptable There are lIIany occasions when it is not ncccssar\' to

prevent entrainment. Sometimes. moderate surging will not present a problem. In such cases. piping can be sized lor smaller diameters at considerable savings.

Sometimes, sUl'ging caused by gas entrainmellt can be reduced hy providing a means for the gas to escape :u a point downstream in the out let pipe . such as via some, type of gas-liquid separator. If this is practical. the piping can be of smaller r!iameter. However, because it is !lot possible to predict the extent of entrainment-and. hence. calculate t.he pft.�ssure drop with certaint\,-'lI1�' such approach should be auopteu cautiously.

Acknowledgment The author wishes to thank Imperial Chemical lndus­

tries ('or its permissioll to publish this article.

J. Matley. !:tI,/iII

References

I. ,\ckCl"s. P .. r;IIJI(�s for 111(' h\"llriluli,: d('!ii�n nf "(flfm draill .... "('\n�IS illUI piPl" Iii 1(.'5. lin :\lajl'S(\", .. Sralillllcn' ()Ilkc. IlJf;�J.

2. Simpo;on, l.. 1.... SIzing piping ("or pr{)(css plillllS. (.'I"m. 1-:"1( .. 111111' Ii. 1 (lIi�

The author r. D. Hills is all ('II1,{im'cl ill� fkp:U11111'1t1 hC.'ilHI :1IIo;I(,'r ami fluid·llow '1)('( iali�1 \\"j111 IlIIpe'nal Cht'micill 1lIIllIlOlri('<iI PI.C ,P.O, Bw( �I). i, "'iIlJlillg-IfIIl. :"\lllIh\\-il"l1. (:hc,'"hiu' (:\\,H 1 1>1. EI1�l;tnd\. Pf't .. '\ iOllsly. !'(' II:uIIH"t'II;' r"(HC'c;.o; ('II�iIU'('r ill\I,I •• ."I'd �\ illl 1,,1.1( t· ...... il'n'/"llIlH'lJl. 111;1111 Itrlllhll'"hoOliIW; ;11111 (lnu (· .... s Ik�il{ll. '-k hllld� a B.Selbll,!:.) awl;1 I'h.D. 11"11111 11II1'{'ri:d (:ull('gl.', l.ondlln.