17
Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers Firestone/Litchfield Community Learning Center Community Update September 27, 2011

Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

  • Upload
    ogden

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers. Community Update September 27, 2011. Firestone/Litchfield Community Learning Center. Agenda. Program of Requirements (POR) update Provide basic project information Site information - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Firestone/Litchfield Community Learning Center

CommunityUpdate

September 27, 2011

Page 2: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Agenda

Program of Requirements (POR) update Provide basic project information Site information Review results of renovation/addition study Next Steps Question and Answer Session

Page 3: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Program of Requirements(POR) update

GYMNASIUM

ART

CL CLCL

CL CLCL

CL CLCL

CL CLCL

CLCL

CL CLCL

SESE

SESE

MUSIC Classrooms

Akron Public Schools Student Typical MHS

CL

SE

SE

MUSIC ART

LAB LAB LAB

LAB LAB LAB

MOD TECH

LIFE SKILLS

AUDITORIUM

MEDIA CTRCOMPLAB

SE Rooms

CAFETERIA

GYMNASIUM

Define all rooms and spaces necessary for current and future programs.

Over 30 meetings held with staff, administrators, curriculum, and community.

POR reflects needs for Firestone/Litchfield.

Page 4: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Firestone/Litchfield Community Learning Center

Proposed Student Capacity: 640 Middle School 1,400 High School (including Career

Tech) Proposed Program Area: 364,000 sq ft

Page 5: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Site information

Geotechnical Engineering Analysis Suitability for

development Site Survey

Documentation of site conditions

Page 6: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Project Goals

Provide facilities meeting needs of the community for future generations.

Provide equity in the District. Safe and Secure Learning

Environments for Teachers and Students.

Page 7: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study

OSFC Recommendation; Replace Community request – study

renovation vs. replacement. Apply Program of Requirements

(POR) to current facilities to achieve project goals.

Establish reconfigurations/ additions required.

Review physical building and renovations necessary.

Refine renovation/addition construction cost.

Identify issues to consider in a renovation/addition project.

Page 8: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Physical Structure

Walls, roofs and windows Mechanical Systems Electrical Systems Interior Finishes Technology Systems Fire alarm, sprinkler

system Handicap Accessibility Site Condition Hazardous Material

Page 9: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Apply POR to existing facilities

Page 10: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Apply POR to existing facilities

Page 11: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study - Additions

Program spaces not currently provided at Firestone/Litchfield; Sufficient quantity of classrooms and SPED spaces. Theatre Classroom, Practice/Ensemble spaces, Digital Studio,

Dressing Rooms/Makeup, control room. Additional Life Skills, Career-Based Intervention, OT/PT spaces.

Inadequate/insufficient Spaces; Special Education, Music Theory, Life Skills, Project Lead-the-

Way, undersized classrooms. Shortage of available spaces requires use of spaces not intended

for designed use. Excessive Space;

Corridors, LRC, Large Instruction Area, certain classrooms, computer labs, drawing studio, Business Ed.

Additions Required; 48,000 sq. ft.

Page 12: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Area Summary

403,000 sq. ft. total required to meet program due to oversize/non-programmable space

Area (sq. ft.)

Current Building Area 355,000

Oversize/Non-Programmable Space 39,000

Current Usable Programmable Space (current, less non-programmable) 316,000

Additions Required to meet 364,000 s.f. Program 48,000

Page 13: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Construction Cost

Additional construction cost for reno/add project (LFI)

Renovation/Addition Cost (403,000 sq. ft.)

New Construction Cost (364,000 sq. ft.)

Litchfield $ 19,250,000 $ 18,300,000

Firestone $ 46,400,000 $ 44,250,000

Natatorium Renovation $ 2,250,000 $ 2,250,000

Activities Center Renovation $ 1,350,000 $ 1,350,000

Total Construction Cost $ 69,250,000 $ 66,150,000 $ 3,100,000

Page 14: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Additions

Academic additions to meet curriculum needs. Cafeterias and Kitchens undersized. Visual & Performing Arts program needs.

Theatre Classroom, dance, music. PE/Athletics locker room/coaches areas.

Page 15: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Renovation Study – Considerations

•Operational ImpactOperational Impact•Parking/site circulationParking/site circulation•Separate kitchensSeparate kitchens•Additions impact parking and athletic fieldsAdditions impact parking and athletic fields•Larger, less efficient building to maintain and operate than new buildLarger, less efficient building to maintain and operate than new build

•Physical StructurePhysical Structure•LEED Silver Certification challenges (envelope, energy efficiency)LEED Silver Certification challenges (envelope, energy efficiency)•Building footprint and configurationBuilding footprint and configuration•Low structure – academic areas Low structure – academic areas

•ConstructionConstruction•Phased construction – adds to construction cost and schedulePhased construction – adds to construction cost and schedule

•Educational ImpactEducational Impact•Classrooms do not meet current design standardsClassrooms do not meet current design standards•Handicap accessibilityHandicap accessibility•Low ceilingsLow ceilings•Remote/isolated spaces. Remote/isolated spaces.

Renovation ImpactsRenovation Impacts

Page 16: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Next Steps

Renovation study validated current decision to replace Submit POR to JBR/Board Continue Design Process

Additional meetings with staff, administrators, curriculum and community Develop site/building layout concepts Develop renderings Bidding Documents

Construction Timeline

Bidding Documents : Spring 2013 Construction: Spring 2013 through summer 2015

Page 17: Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers

Questions & Answers