Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 1
May 19th 2016 | Faculty Club Leuven | Session: Quality by Design and MoreRobin Kastilan, Jörg Schuphan, Rainer Fischer, Johannes Felix Buyel
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS FACILITATE PROCESS OPTIMIZATION IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL PROTEIN PRODUCTION – CLARIFICATION AS A CASE STUDY
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 2
Acknowledgments
Team: Department of Integrated Production Platforms at the Fraunhofer-Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied
Ecology IMEInstitute for Molecular Biotechnology at the RWTH Aachen University
Funding: Fraunhofer Future FoundationFraunhofer Internal Programs: Attract
European Research Council: Future-Pharma grant
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 3
AGENDA
Applied research in Germany Importance of biopharmaceutical proteins
DoE approach to increase filter capacity during clarification Pichia pastoris fermentation broth
Nicotiana tabacum extract
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 4
Organizations covering the product development process
APPLIED RESEARCH IN GERMANY
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 5
Research landscape
Helmholtz-Association
Industry
Max-Planck-Society Fraunhofer-SocietyUniversities
Lead/Innovation Product/Application
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 6
Fraunhofer society and Fraunhofer IME in numbers
Largest society for applied research in Germany >22,000 employees
Budget of >2 billion €/a Structured in >60 institutes
Clustered in seven alliances E.g. life sciences
Fraunhofer IME ~650 employees
~70 mio. € budget Focus on biopharmaceuticals
IME
man
agem
ent (
Prof
. D
r. R
aine
r Fis
cher
)
IPGMP
Molecular Biology Division (260)
AachenPBT, IBT, IMT, IPP (160)
MünsterFAG (25)
GiessenBRE (30)
FrankfurtTMP (25)
HamburgSCP (20)
Applied Ecology Division (113)
SchmallenbergECC, ECT, ESA, EFA,
BAM (113)
Global Divisions (200)
Newark (DE)CMB (105)
Santiago (CL)CSB (95)IMB
(RWTH Aachen University) (65)
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 7
Covers each step in the value chain up to clinical phase II
Drug discovery- SCP- HTS assay development- Small molecule libraries
Lead development- IMT, BRE- Human, insect and MO protein repertoires- mAbs, antibiotics
Pre-clinical studies- IMT, PBT- Mice, rabbit, goat- In house animal facilities
Process development- PBT, IPP- Multi-platform expression screening- DoE screening
GMP-manufacture of APIs- IPP- Process scale-up- Bulk API release
Clinical phase trials- TMP- Linked to university hospital- Access to volunteers and patients
Fraunhofer IME along the pharma value chain
ProductLead
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 8
mAbs, enzymes, artificial proteins
IMPORTANCE OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL PROTEINS
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 9
Use of biopharmaceutical proteins – Example: HIV/AIDS
PhRMA, in: PhRMA (Ed.), PhRMA annual membership survey, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Washington, D.C., USA 2014, pp. 1-84.
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 10
R&D cost development in the pharma sector
DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., Hansen, R. W., Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. J. Health Econ. 2016, 47, 20-33.PhRMA, in: PhRMA (Ed.), PhRMA annual membership survey, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Washington, D.C., USA 2014, pp. 1-84.www.fda.gov
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 11
Strain development
Upstream production
Harvest Clarification Purification
Typical process flow
Batch
Versatile active pharmaceutical ingredients Cancer therapy
Vaccines Metabolic diseases
Yield
Purity
QualityProduct
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 12
Pichia pastoris broth and tobacco extract
DOE APPROACH TO INCREASE FILTER CAPACITY DURING CLARIFICATION
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 13
Process overview
Clarification should be scalable and cost effective avoid centrifuges Costs for filters are high due to particle burden
1
2 3
High particle burden
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 14
Broth/extract Addition of diatomaceous earth Incubation Filtration
Evaluate the potential of a new filtration unit
Potential benefits Single-use improved containment
Increased capacity Simplified process
Potential drawbacks Product loss due to binding to
diatomaceous earth
DE-filtration
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 15
Application to P. pastoris fermentation broth
Diatomaceous earth (DE) body-feed filtration pH 6.0 (manufacturer´s recommendation)
DE concentration of 30−75 g L-1
Incubation time 10 min.
Feed WCM: 118 g L-1
Turbidity: 45,000 NTU Excellent capacity, but…
…no product recovery
WCM: wet cell mass; NTU nephelometric turbidity units
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 16
Troubleshooting via DoE – Step 1
Binding to DE can be due to electrostatic interaction pH 6.0−8.0
NaCl 0−250 mM Constant incubation (10 min) and
DE concentration (60 g L-1)
Filter capacity not tested I-optimal 16-run design
Product recovery partially restored pH effect dominant
Salt effect significant, but irrelevant
Recovery p-valueModel 4.31-13
pH 7.25-14
Salt 0.011176pH2 1.27-10
Salt2 0.018383Lack of Fit 0.769588
R2 0.995981Adj. R2 0.99452
Pred. R2 0.991626
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 17
Troubleshooting via DoE – Step 2
Factors pH 7.5−9.5
DE conc. 30−60 g L-1
Incubation 10 min.
I-optimal, 16-run Unexpectedly high recovery
Different broth conditions Two extreme value for capacity
Flawed data entry Unknown reason
Recovery p-valueflawed
p-value corrected
Model 1.08-5 9.84-8
pH n.a. 0.003084DE concentration 1.08-5 1.73-8
pH × DE conc. n.a. 0.006655Lack of Fit 0.5896 0.8498
R2 0.7599 0.9429Adj. R2 0.7428 0.9287
Pred. R2 0.6513 0.8601
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 18
Troubleshooting via DoE – Step 3
Recovery Agent is
beneficial
Model will be refined
Capacity
Model has good quality (all R2 >0.95)
Factor unit had to be changed
Work in progress
Recovery p-valueModel 0.0025
pH 0.1389Agent 0.0038
pH × agent 0.0014Agent2 0.0274
Lack of Fit 0.5020R2 0.7217
Adj. R2 0.6290Pred. R2 0.3725
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 19
Different equipment setups possible Select the simplest and most
effective (1)
pH 8.0 Salt 500 mM
No product losses Limited access to equipment
Select only one setup instead of categoric factor
Skip pH as factor for initial screening
Application to tobacco extract
C1 & C2: control setups with conventional filters
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 20
DoE screening
Factors I-optimal, 14-run
DE concentration 25−60 g L-1
Incubation time 10−90 min
Product recovery not affected Capacity increased with DE conc.
Incubation time significant but irrelevant
Next steps
Scale-up Transfer to other products
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 21
Summary
DoE approach useful to identify significant and relevant process parameters
Parameter selection and design depend on
User experience Prior knowledge
Process constraints Personal preferences
Availability of material …
Knowing physical/technicalconstraints can help to interpret
extreme values
© Fraunhofer – Do not share without permission Page 22
…questions, comments and suggestions are highly welcome…
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ATTENTION.
Dr. rer. nat. Johannes Buyel, M. Sc.Head of Department Integrated Production PlatformsGroup leader Fraunhofer-Attract FAST-PEPFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME/Institute for Molecular Biotechnology of the RWTH Aachen UniversityForckenbeckstraße 6, A 30752074 Aachen
Tel.: ++49 241 6085 13162Fax: ++49 241 6085 10000E-mail: [email protected]
© Fraunhofer