1

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

12 CFR Parts 22, 172

[Docket ID OCC-2014-0016]

RIN 1557-AD84

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 208

[Regulation H, Docket No. R-1498]

RIN 7100 AE-22

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

12 CFR Part 339

RIN 3064-AE27

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 614

RIN 3052-AC93

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 760

RIN 3133-AE40

2

Loans in Areas Having Special Flood Hazards

AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury; Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Farm Credit Administration;

National Credit Union Administration.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System (Board), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Farm

Credit Administration (FCA), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)

(collectively, the Agencies) are amending their regulations regarding loans in areas having

special flood hazards to implement certain provisions of the Homeowner Flood Insurance

Affordability Act of 2014 (HFIAA), which amends some of the changes to the Flood Disaster

Protection Act of 1973 mandated by the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012

(Biggert-Waters). Specifically, the final rule requires the escrow of flood insurance payments on

residential improved real estate securing a loan, consistent with the changes set forth in HFIAA.

The final rule also incorporates an exemption in HFIAA for certain detached structures from the

mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. Furthermore, the final rule implements the

provisions of Biggert-Waters related to the force placement of flood insurance. Finally, the final

rule integrates the OCC’s flood insurance regulations for national banks and Federal savings

associations. The Agencies plan to address the private flood insurance provisions in Biggert-

Waters in a separate rulemaking.

DATES: The effective date of amendatory instructions 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12 and 13 is October

1, 2015. The effective date of amendatory instructions 2, 6, 8, 11 and 14 is January 1, 2016.

3

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OCC: Rhonda L. Daniels, Compliance Specialist, Compliance Policy Division, (202) 649-5405;

Margaret C. Hesse, Senior Counsel, Community and Consumer Law Division, (202) 649-6350;

or Heidi M. Thomas, Special Counsel, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, (202)

649-5490, for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing, TTY, (202) 649-5597, Office of the Chief

Counsel.

Board: Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory Consumer Financial Services Analyst (202) 452-

2705; Vivian W. Wong, Counsel (202) 452-3667, Division of Consumer and Community

Affairs; or Daniel Ericson, Counsel (202) 452-3359, Legal Division; for users of

Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263-4869.

FDIC: Navid Choudhury, Counsel, Consumer Compliance Section, (202) 898-6526, Legal

Division; or John Jackwood, Senior Policy Analyst, (202) 898-3991, Division of Depositor and

Consumer Protection.

FCA: Paul K. Gibbs, Senior Accountant, Office of Regulatory Policy (703) 883-4203, TTY

(703) 883-4056; or Mary Alice Donner, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel (703) 883-

4020, TTY (703) 883-4056.

NCUA: Frank Kressman, Associate General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, (703) 518-

6540.

4

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

A. Introduction

In October 2013, the Agencies jointly issued a proposal to implement certain provisions

of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 20121 (Biggert-Waters) over which the

Agencies have jurisdiction (the October 2013 Proposed Rule).2 Specifically, the October 2013

Proposed Rule would have required regulated lending institutions3 to escrow flood insurance

premiums and fees on residential improved real estate securing a loan, unless the regulated

lending institution met the statutory small institution exception. The October 2013 Proposed

Rule also would have required regulated lending institutions to accept private flood insurance

coverage, as defined in Biggert-Waters, to satisfy the mandatory flood insurance purchase

requirement. Furthermore, the October 2013 Proposed Rule contained provisions to implement

the Biggert-Waters changes related to force-placed flood insurance.

In March 2014, the President signed into law the Homeowner Flood Insurance

Affordability Act of 20144 (HFIAA), which amends some of the changes made by Biggert-

Waters to the Flood Disaster Protection Act (FDPA).5 The Agencies jointly issued a proposal in

October 2014 (the October 2014 Proposed Rule) to implement the provisions in HFIAA over

which they have jurisdiction.6 The October 2014 Proposed Rule would have required regulated

lending institutions to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees on residential improved real

1 Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 916 (2012). 2 78 FR 65108 (Oct. 30, 2013). 3 The National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 defines “regulated lending institution” to mean any bank, savings and loan association, credit union, farm credit bank, Federal land bank association, production credit association, or similar institution subject to the supervision of a Federal entity for lending regulation. 42 U.S.C. 4003(a)(1). 4 Pub. L. 113-89, 128 Stat. 1020 (2014). 5 Pub. L. 93-234, 87 Stat. 975 (1973). 6 79 FR 64518 (Oct. 30, 2014).

5

estate securing a loan, consistent with HFIAA’s amendments to Biggert-Waters, and excluded

certain detached structures from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement.

The Agencies are issuing this final rule to implement the escrow provisions and the

detached structures provision detailed in the October 2014 Proposed Rule. In addition, this final

rule incorporates the force-placed flood insurance provisions that the Agencies proposed in the

October 2013 Proposed Rule, which were unaffected by HFIAA. The Agencies plan to address

the private insurance provisions of the October 2013 Proposed Rule in a separate rulemaking. In

connection with the issuance of this final rule, the Agencies have coordinated and consulted with

the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), as required by certain

provisions of the flood insurance statutes.7 Furthermore, the Agencies encourage lenders to

consult Biggert-Waters and HFIAA for further information about revisions to the flood insurance

statutes that will not be implemented through the Agencies’ rulemakings.

B. Flood Insurance Statutes

The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (1968 Act)8 and the FDPA, as amended,

govern the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).9 The 1968 Act made Federally subsidized

flood insurance available to owners of improved real estate or mobile homes located in special

flood hazard areas if the community where the improved real estate or mobile home is located

participates in the NFIP. A special flood hazard area (SFHA) is an area within a floodplain

having a one percent or greater chance of flood occurrence in any given year.10 SFHAs are

delineated on maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for

7 See 42 U.S.C. 4012a(b)(1). Four of the five Agencies (OCC, Board, FDIC, and NCUA) are members of the FFIEC. 8 Pub. L. 90-448, 82 Stat. 572 (1968). 9 These statutes are codified at 42 U.S.C. 4001-4129. The Federal Emergency Management Agency administers the NFIP; its regulations implementing the NFIP appear at 44 CFR parts 59-77. 10 44 CFR 59.1.

6

individual communities.11 A community establishes its eligibility to participate in the NFIP by

adopting and enforcing floodplain management measures that regulate new construction and by

making substantial improvements within its SFHAs to eliminate or minimize future flood

damage.12

Until the adoption of the FDPA in 1973, the purchase of flood insurance was voluntary.

The FDPA made the purchase of flood insurance mandatory in connection with loans made by

regulated lending institutions when the loans are secured by improved real estate or mobile

homes located in a SFHA in a participating community. The FDPA directed the OCC, Board,

FDIC, NCUA, and the former Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)13 to issue regulations

governing the lending institutions that they supervised. These regulations also require lenders to

notify borrowers that the secured property is located in a SFHA and whether Federal disaster

assistance is available with respect to the property in the event of a flood.

Title V of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of

1994, also known as the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 (Reform Act),

comprehensively amended the Federal flood insurance statutes.14 The Reform Act established

new requirements for Federally regulated lending institutions, such as the escrow for flood

insurance premiums under certain conditions and mandatory force placement of flood insurance

coverage. The Reform Act was intended to increase compliance with the mandatory flood

insurance purchase requirements and participation in the NFIP to provide additional income to

the National Flood Insurance Fund and to decrease the financial burden of flooding on the 11 44 CFR part 65. 12 44 CFR part 60. 13 Title III of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010), (Dodd-Frank Act), transferred the powers, duties, and functions formerly performed by the OTS to the FDIC for State savings associations, the OCC for Federal savings associations, and the Board for savings and loan holding companies. The transfer took effect on July 21, 2011, and the OTS was abolished 90 days after that date. 14 Pub. L. 103-325, 108 Stat. 2255 (1994) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq. (1994)).

7

Federal government, taxpayers, and flood victims. In addition, the Reform Act broadened the

mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement to include lenders regulated by the FCA.

The Reform Act required the OCC, Board, FDIC, NCUA, and the former OTS to revise

their flood insurance regulations and required the FCA to promulgate flood insurance regulations

for the first time. The Agencies fulfilled these requirements by issuing a joint final rule in

August 1996.15

C. The Biggert-Waters and HFIAA Amendments

Among other changes,16 Biggert-Waters significantly amended the NFIP requirements

over which the Agencies have jurisdiction. Specifically, Biggert-Waters: (i) increased the

maximum civil money penalty (CMP) that the Agencies may impose per violation when there is

a pattern or practice of flood violations and eliminated the limit on the total amount of penalties

that the Agencies may assess against a regulated lending institution during any calendar year;17

(ii) required the Agencies to issue a rule to direct regulated lending institutions to escrow

premiums and fees for flood insurance on residential improved real estate, unless the regulated

lending institution meets the statutory small institution exception;18 (iii) required the Agencies to

15 61 FR 45684 (Aug. 29, 1996). 16 The Agencies note, for example, that section 100222 of Biggert-Waters mandates a revision to the Special Information Booklet required under section 5 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (RESPA) (12 U.S.C. 2604(b)) to include a notice to the borrower of the availability of flood insurance under the NFIP or from a private insurance company, whether or not the real estate is located in an area having special flood hazards. The requirement to revise the Special Information Booklet is the responsibility of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) under RESPA. See 80 FR 17414 (Apr. 1, 2015). In addition, section 100204 of Biggert-Waters directs the Administrator of FEMA to make flood insurance available to cover residential properties of five or more residences. The maximum coverage made available to such residential properties is now equal to the coverage made available to commercial properties. FEMA made policies for such properties available as of June 1, 2014. See “Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage for Other Residential Buildings,” May 30, 2014 (Board: CA 14-3; OCC: Bulletin 2014-26; FDIC: FIL 28-2014, FCA: Informational Memorandum, May 30, 2014; NCUA: http://www.ncua.gov/Legal/Documents/InteragencyIncreasedCoverageGuidance.pdf). 17 Section 100208 of Biggert-Waters, amending section 102(f)(5) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5)). 18 Section 100209 of Biggert-Waters, amending section 102(d) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)). Congress further amended section 42 U.S.C. 4012a(d) subsequent to the enactment of Biggert-Waters to clarify that the flood

8

issue a rule to direct regulated lending institutions to accept private flood insurance, as defined

by Biggert-Waters, and to notify borrowers of the availability of private flood insurance;19 and

(iv) amended the force-placed insurance requirement to clarify that regulated lending institutions

may charge a borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred for coverage beginning on the

date on which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide sufficient

coverage and to prescribe the procedures for terminating force-placed insurance.20

HFIAA further amended the changes set forth in Biggert-Waters. Among these changes

were amendments that tied the escrow requirement to the origination, refinance, increase,

extension, or renewal of a loan on or after January 1, 2016, and provided additional exceptions to

the escrow requirement.21 HFIAA also mandated that the Agencies by regulation direct

regulated lending institutions that are not excepted from the escrow requirements to provide an

option to borrowers to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for outstanding loans.22 In

addition, HFIAA provided a new exemption to the mandatory flood insurance purchase

requirement for a structure that is part of a residential property but is detached from the primary

residential structure and does not serve as a residence.23

As previously discussed in guidance issued by the Agencies,24 the CMP provisions25 and

the force-placed insurance requirements in Biggert-Waters were effective upon enactment of

insurance escrow requirement applies only to loans secured by residential improved real estate. See Pub. L. 112-281, 125 Stat. 2485 (Jan. 14, 2013). 19 Section 100239 of Biggert-Waters, amending section 102(b) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b)) and section 1364(a)(3)(C) of the 1968 Act (42 U.S.C. 4104a(a)(3)(C)). 20 Section 100244 of the Act, amending section 102(e) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(e)). 21 Section 25 of HFIAA, amending section 102(d) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)). 22 “Outstanding loan” is defined in section 25(b)(1)(B)(i)(II) of HFIAA. 23 Section 13 of HFIAA, amending section 102(c) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(c)). The Agencies note that Section 13 of HFIAA also amends section 5(b) of RESPA (12 U.S.C. 2604(b)) to require language related to detached structures be included in the required Special Information Booklet. The requirement to revise the Special Information Booklet under RESPA falls under the jurisdiction of the CFPB. 24 “Interagency Statement on the Impact of Biggert-Waters Act,” March 29, 2013 (Board: CA 13-2; OCC: Bulletin 2013-10; FDIC: FIL 14-2013, FCA: Informational Memorandum, March 29, 2013; NCUA: 13-RA-03).

9

Biggert-Waters. Similarly, the provision in HFIAA excluding certain detached structures from

the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement became effective upon the enactment of

HFIAA. In contrast, Biggert-Waters and HFIAA require the Agencies to issue regulations

implementing both the escrow and private flood insurance provisions.

II. The Agencies’ Proposed Revisions

A. Summary of the October 2013 Proposed Rule

In the October 2013 Proposed Rule, the Agencies proposed to revise their respective

flood insurance regulations to implement the Biggert-Waters amendments addressing the escrow

of flood insurance payments, private flood insurance, and force-placed insurance. The October

2013 Proposed Rule would have required a regulated lending institution, or servicer acting on its

behalf, to escrow premiums and fees for flood insurance for any loan secured by residential

improved real estate or a mobile home that was made or outstanding on or after July 6, 2014,

unless the institution qualified for the statutory exception for small institutions.26

The October 2013 Proposed Rule also would have amended the provisions concerning

the force placement of flood insurance to clarify that a lender or its servicer has the authority to

charge a borrower for the cost of flood insurance coverage commencing on the date on which the

borrower’s coverage lapsed or became insufficient. Furthermore, the October 2013 Proposed

Rule would have stipulated the circumstances under which a lender or its servicer must terminate

force-placed flood insurance coverage and refund payments to a borrower and the documentary

25 Some of the Agencies have revised their regulations to incorporate these increased CMPs. See OCC: 77 FR 66529 (Nov. 11, 2012) and 77 FR 76354 (Dec. 28, 2012); Board: 77 FR 68680 (Nov. 16, 2012); FDIC: 77 FR 74573 (Dec. 17, 2012); and FCA: 78 FR 24336 (April 25, 2013). The NCUA is in the process of updating its rule to reflect this CMP change. 26 However, with HFIAA’s enactment in March 2014, the Agencies issued the October 2014 Proposed Rule to modify the proposed escrow provisions in the October 2013 Proposed Rule, consistent with HFIAA’s changes to the Biggert-Waters escrow provisions.

10

evidence a lender must accept to confirm that a borrower has obtained an appropriate amount of

flood insurance coverage.

The October 2013 Proposed Rule included new and revised sample notice forms and

clauses that included language concerning the availability of private flood insurance coverage,

consistent with Biggert-Waters, and that provided sample language for regulated lending

institutions to use to comply with the proposal’s escrow notice requirement. The OCC and the

FDIC proposed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule to integrate their flood insurance regulations

for national banks and Federal savings associations and for State non-member banks and State

savings associations, respectively.

Finally, consistent with Biggert-Waters, the October 2013 Proposed Rule would have

required a regulated lending institutions to accept private flood insurance that meets the statutory

definition to satisfy the mandatory purchase requirement and specifically requested comment on

various issues related to this requirement.27

B. Summary of the October 2014 Proposed Rule

Under the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the Agencies proposed to exempt certain

detached structures on residential property from the mandatory flood insurance purchase

requirement and to amend the requirement to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees,

consistent with the Biggert-Waters escrow provisions as amended by HFIAA. Specifically, the

October 2014 Proposed Rule would have provided that flood insurance would not be required for

any structure that is part of any residential property but is detached from the primary residential

structure of such property and does not serve as a residence, consistent with HFIAA.

27 As mentioned above, the Agencies will address issues related to private flood insurance in a separate rulemaking.

11

In addition, the October 2014 Proposed Rule generally would have required regulated

lending institutions, or servicers acting on their behalf, to escrow premiums and fees for flood

insurance for any loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made,

increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016. The Agencies also proposed in the

October 2014 Proposed Rule several exceptions to the escrow requirement as set forth in

Biggert-Waters and HFIAA, including an exception for certain regulated lending institutions

with total assets of less than $1 billion, and exceptions for business, commercial, and agricultural

purpose loans, certain subordinate lien loans, certain condominium and similar loans, home

equity lines of credit, nonperforming loans, and short-term loans.

The October 2014 Proposed Rule also would have required regulated lending institutions

not subject to an escrow exception to offer borrowers the option to escrow loans outstanding as

of January 1, 2016. Regulated lending institutions that no longer qualified for the small lender

exception of less than $1 billion in assets also would have had to comply with the general escrow

requirement and the option to escrow requirement.

C. Overview of Public Comments

The Agencies received 81 written comments on the October 2013 Proposed Rule and 52

written comments on the October 2014 Proposed Rule. Between the two proposed rules, the

Agencies received comments from a wide range of commenters, such as: financial institutions

(including banks, credit unions, and farm credit institutions); various trade associations

(including bankers’ trade associations, credit union trade associations, a farm credit trade

association, home building and realtor trade associations, and a flood hazard determination trade

association); the insurance industry (including insurance companies, trade associations, and

brokers); individuals; public interest/consumer advocates; state insurance regulators; and a

12

municipal government. In addition to receiving written comments, the Agencies conferred with

several stakeholders in the flood insurance community, including state insurance regulators, the

National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) staff, and FEMA staff.28

The Agencies received numerous comments supporting the exemption for certain

detached structures from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. Many of these

commenters requested clarifications of the terms used in the exemption, including the meanings

of the terms “residential property,” “detached structure,” and “serve as a residence.” The

Agencies also sought comment on whether the exemption should be restricted to consumer

purpose loans. Many commenters opposed the Agencies incorporating such a limitation. Some

commenters also wanted the Agencies to expand the exemption to include non-residential

property. Commenters also were uniformly opposed to the Agencies stating that regulated

lending institutions need not perform a flood hazard determination for any properties or

structures that are exempt from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement because a

flood hazard determination is often needed to determine what types of structures exist on the

property.

Many commenters also offered suggestions on the Agencies’ proposed escrow

provisions. Several commenters recommended that the Agencies apply the general escrow

requirement to applications received on or after January 1, 2016. Some commenters suggested

clarifications of the language of the escrow notice. Commenters were supportive of the

exceptions to the escrow requirement, and some commenters asked for additional exceptions.

Most commenters on the proposed escrow provisions requested clarifications on the various

exceptions to the escrow requirement. There were also comments questioning whether regulated

28 The Agencies have placed summaries of these meetings in the public comment file.

13

lending institutions are expected to monitor the status of excepted loans to ensure they continue

to meet the exception from the escrow requirement, especially with respect to excepted

subordinate lien loans and nonperforming loans. Furthermore, the Agencies received several

comments on the proposed rule to implement the option to escrow requirement. Commenters

were supportive of the Agencies’ interpretation that the option to escrow requirement does not

apply to loans and issuers that are excepted from the general escrow requirement. The Agencies

also received comments supporting the proposal that a regulated lending institution must

establish an escrow “as soon as reasonably practicable” after a consumer requests the option to

escrow, although other commenters requested further clarification.

In addition, the Agencies received many comment letters that addressed force placement

issues. Commenters generally supported the proposed provisions on force placement. However,

commenters sought clarification on various force placement issues, such as, sufficiency of proof

of coverage when a borrower obtains flood insurance after the lender or its servicer has force

placed the insurance; the definition of the term “lapsed;” whether force-placed insurance only

should be terminated when the borrower provides proof of NFIP-compliant flood insurance

coverage; whether a refund for any period of overlapping coverage should be made to the

borrower by the lender within 30 days of the borrower obtaining coverage; when a lender should

cancel force-placed flood insurance; what constitutes proof of coverage for purposes of

determining whether a borrower has obtained alternative flood insurance coverage; and how to

resolve force placement issues when a borrower is in default.

Finally, the Agencies received numerous comment letters on the private flood insurance

provisions the Agencies proposed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule. As the Agencies have

explained above, the Agencies plan to address these issues in a separate rulemaking.

14

III. Summary of the Final Rule

The amendments finalized by this rulemaking are summarized below and more

specifically described in V. Section-by-Section Analysis of this preamble. Although the

Agencies’ final regulations are substantively consistent, the format of the regulatory text varies

to conform to each Agency’s current regulation.

The final rule sets forth the new exemption in the FDPA, as amended by section 13 of

HFIAA, to the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement for any structure that is a part of

a residential property, but is detached from the primary residential structure and does not serve as

a residence. Consistent with commenters’ suggestions, the final rule includes clarifications of

the terms “a structure that is part of a residential property,” “detached,” and “serve as a

residence.”

In accordance with the FDPA, as amended by Biggert-Waters and HFIAA, the final rule

also requires regulated lending institutions, or servicers acting on their behalf, to escrow

premiums and fees for flood insurance for any loan secured by residential improved real estate or

a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016. The

FDPA, as amended by Biggert-Waters, also provides that, except as may be required under

applicable State law, a regulated lending institution would not be required to escrow if it has total

assets of less than $1 billion and, as of the date of enactment of Biggert-Waters, July 6, 2012,

was not required by Federal or State law to escrow taxes or insurance for the term of the loan and

did not have a policy of uniformly and consistently escrowing taxes and insurance. The

Agencies are implementing this exception in the final rule with some clarifications.

Furthermore, the Agencies are adopting transition rules for regulated lending institutions that

have a change in status and no longer qualify for this small-lender exception.

15

Moreover, the final rule implements the following additional exceptions from the escrow

requirement, as amended by HFIAA for: (i) loans that are in a subordinate position to a senior

lien secured by the same property for which flood insurance is being provided; (ii) loans secured

by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is part of a condominium, cooperative,

or other project development, provided certain conditions are met; (iii) loans that are extensions

of credit primarily for a business, commercial, or agricultural purpose; (iv) home equity lines of

credit; (v) nonperforming loans; and (vi) loans with terms not longer than 12 months. The

Agencies are clarifying in the final rule that, when a regulated lending institution determines that

an exception no longer applies, the institution must require the escrow of flood insurance

premiums and fees.

The Agencies note that the escrow provisions in the Agencies’ rules in effect on July 5,

2012, the day before Biggert-Waters was enacted, remain in effect, and will be enforced by the

Agencies, through December 31, 2015, the day before the effective date of the escrow

provisions.29

The final rule also implements the requirement under HFIAA that regulated lending

institutions not excepted from the escrow requirement offer and make available to a borrower the

option to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for loans that are outstanding as of January

1, 2016. The final rule is generally consistent with the language the Agencies proposed in the

October 2014 Proposed Rule. However, the Agencies are providing additional time, until June

30, 2016, for regulated lending institutions to mail or deliver information to borrowers about the

option to escrow, based on some commenters’ suggestions. The Agencies’ final rule also adopts

29 Each Agency’s current escrow provision provides that a regulated lending institution must escrow all premiums and fees for required flood insurance if the institution requires the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums, fees or other charges. See 12 CFR 22.5 and 172.5 (OCC); 12 CFR 208.25(e) (Board); 12 CR 339.5 (FDIC); 12 CFR 614.4935 (FCA); and 12 CFR 760.5 (NCUA).

16

the proposal to require regulated lending institutions that no longer qualify for the small lender

exception to offer and make available to a borrower the option to escrow flood insurance

premiums and fees.

The Agencies’ final rule includes new and revised sample notice forms and clauses.

Specifically, the final rule amends the current Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards

and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance, set forth as Appendix A in the Agencies’

respective regulations, to add language concerning the escrow requirement. The Agencies are

adopting minor amendments to the language the Agencies proposed in the October 2014

Proposed Rule regarding the escrow requirement in light of recommendations from commenters.

Moreover, the Agencies concur with commenters’ suggestions to include language in Appendix

A similar to the language HFIAA section 13(b) requires to be included in the Special

Information Booklet in connection with the exemption from the mandatory flood insurance

purchase requirement for certain detached structures. Appendix A, as amended by the Agencies

in this final rule, also contains language proposed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule to include

the disclosures required by section 102(b)(6) of the FDPA, as added by section 100239 of

Biggert-Waters, regarding the availability of private flood insurance coverage and other technical

changes.

The final rule also includes an additional sample clause, Sample Clause for Option to

Escrow for Outstanding Loans, as Appendix B, to assist institutions in complying with the

requirement to inform borrowers of outstanding loans about their option to escrow flood

insurance premiums and fees. The Agencies are making minor language and formatting changes

to Appendix B as proposed in the October 2014 Proposed Rule to be consistent with a

commenter’s recommendations and to improve readability.

17

Furthermore, consistent with Biggert-Waters, the Agencies’ final rule amends the force

placement of flood insurance provisions to clarify that a lender or its servicer has the authority to

charge a borrower for the cost of flood insurance coverage commencing on the date on which the

borrower’s coverage lapsed or became insufficient. The final rule also stipulates the

circumstances under which a lender or its servicer must terminate force-placed flood insurance

coverage and refund payments to a borrower. It also sets forth the documentary evidence a

lender must accept to confirm that a borrower has obtained an appropriate amount of flood

insurance coverage.

The Agencies also adopt needed technical corrections proposed in the 2013 Proposed

Rule. For example, the Agencies’ final rule corrects all references to the head of FEMA from

“Director” to “Administrator.” 30 In addition, the OCC is finalizing the integration of its flood

insurance regulations for national banks and Federal savings associations. The FDIC has

integrated its flood insurance regulations for State non-member banks and State savings

associations in a separate rulemaking.31

The escrow and option to escrow provisions in this final rule, as well as the revisions to

Appendix A and new Appendix B, will become effective on January 1, 2016, consistent with

HFIAA. Although the amendments to Appendix A include changes unrelated to the escrow

provisions, the Agencies are delaying the effective date of all changes to the Appendix in the

interest of reducing compliance burden on regulated lending institutions. All other provisions

implemented in this final rule will become effective on October 1, 2015.

30 6 U.S.C. 313 31 79 FR 75742 (Dec. 19, 2014).

18

IV. Legal Authority

Section 102(b) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b)), as amended, provides that the

Agencies (after consultation and coordination with the FFIEC) shall by regulation direct

regulated lending institutions not to make, increase, extend, or renew any loan secured by

improved real estate or a mobile home located or to be located in an area that has been identified

by the Administrator of FEMA as an area having special flood hazards and in which flood

insurance has been made available under the NFIP, unless the building or mobile home and any

personal property securing such loan is covered for the term of the loan by flood insurance.

Thus, section 102(b) of the FDPA grants the Agencies rulemaking authority and also requires the

Agencies to implement this mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement for regulated

lending institutions by regulation.

Section 102(c) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(c)) sets forth specific exceptions to the

mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. The Agencies are authorized to implement

these exceptions.

Section 102(d) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)), as amended by section 25 of HFIAA,

states that the Agencies (after consultation and coordination with the FFIEC) must by regulation

require all premiums and fees for flood insurance under the 1968 Act for residential improved

real estate or a mobile home be paid to the regulated lending institution or servicer for any loan

secured by the improved real estate or mobile home with the same frequency as payments on the

loan are made for the duration of the loan. The statute requires that such funds be deposited in

an escrow account on behalf of the borrower and used to pay the flood insurance provider when

premiums are due. Section 25(b) of HFIAA applies these requirements to loans that are

originated, refinanced, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016.

19

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by HFIAA, also directs the Agencies to

implement the seven exceptions to this requirement that are set forth in the statute. Section 25(b)

of HFIAA further states that the Agencies (after consultation and coordination with the FFIEC)

shall by regulation direct that each regulated lending institution offer and make available to a

borrower of an outstanding loan the option to have the borrower’s payment of flood insurance

premiums and fees escrowed.

V. Section-by-Section Analysis

___.___ Authority, purpose, and scope

As discussed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule, the title of the head of FEMA has

changed from “Director” to “Administrator” since the Agencies last revised their flood insurance

regulations. The Agencies proposed a technical amendment consistent with that change. No

comments were received on the proposed technical amendment to designate correctly the head of

FEMA. The Agencies therefore adopt the change in title of the head of FEMA from “Director”

to “Administrator” in the scope section as proposed, and in subsequent sections of their

regulations.

As part of the OCC’s consolidation of its flood insurance rule, the OCC also proposed the

insertion of the term “Federal savings association” where necessary throughout its flood

insurance rule. No comments were received on this proposed change. The OCC therefore

adopts the change as proposed.

___.___ Definitions

As noted above in ___.___ Authority, purpose, and scope, the Agencies proposed

technical amendments to change the references to the head of FEMA from “Director” to

“Administrator” in the definitions. The Agencies are adopting these changes as proposed.

20

OCC-only definitions.

The OCC proposed amendments to the definition section for purposes of integrating its

national bank and Federal savings association flood insurance rules. First, the proposed rule

provided that the term “Federal savings association” means a Federal savings association as

defined in 12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(2) and any service corporations thereof. This definition is identical

to the definition of “Federal savings association” in 12 CFR part 172, except that part 172

specifically referenced “subsidiaries.” Current 12 CFR part 22 does not specifically include a

reference to bank operating subsidiaries because such subsidiaries are subject to the rules

applicable to the operations of their parent bank pursuant to 12 CFR 5.34. Because Federal

savings association operating subsidiaries also are subject to the same rules applicable to the

parent savings association, as provided by 12 CFR 159.3(h),32 the inclusion of “subsidiary” in

this definition is unnecessary and its removal will not affect the applicability of 12 CFR part 22

to Federal savings association operating subsidiaries.

Second, the OCC proposed to remove the definition of “bank,” which the rule currently

defines as meaning a national bank, and replaced “bank” with “national bank” throughout the

final rule. The OCC did not receive any comments on these technical changes. However, the

final rule adds a definition of “national bank” to include Federal branches and agencies of a

foreign bank. Federal branches and agencies are currently subject to the same flood insurance

requirements as national banks.33 The addition of this definition clarifies the scope of the rule

and promotes consistency throughout the OCC’s rules and regulations.

32 As of July 1, 2015, 12 CFR 159.3(h) is removed and replaced by 12 CFR 5.38(e)(3). See 80 FR 28346 (May 18, 2015). 33 See, e.g., Comptroller’s Handbook, Federal Branches and Agencies Supervision, September 2014, p. 22 (“Federal branches and agencies must ensure appropriate flood insurance coverage when making, increasing, extending, or renewing a loan secured by improved real estate or a mobile home located in a special flood hazard area in a community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program.”).

21

___.___ Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

The current regulation provides that a regulated lending institution shall not make,

increase, extend, or renew any designated loan34 unless the building or mobile home and any

personal property securing the loan is covered by flood insurance for the term of the loan. This

provision further provides that flood insurance coverage is limited to the overall value of the

property securing the designated loan minus the value of the land on which the property is

located. The October 2013 Proposed Rule would have revised the language relating to the

coverage limit to reflect more accurately what is actually covered under Federal flood insurance

statutes. Specifically, the Agencies proposed that the language be amended to state that flood

insurance coverage is limited to the building or mobile home and any personal property securing

the loan and not the land itself. Some commenters indicated the proposed amendment may add

confusion because there may be concern that the amendment indicates a change from past

practice. One commenter suggested defining the value of the building as either the replacement

cost of the structure or the appraised value minus the land value as determined from the appraisal

or the insurable value as obtained from the insurance agent writing the policy.

In response to these comments, the Agencies emphasize that the proposed change does

not set forth a new requirement, but merely clarifies the long-standing legal interpretation that

Federal flood insurance coverage does not apply to land. In proposing this change, the Agencies

simply intended to reduce confusion by clarifying the meaning of the term to reflect what is

actually covered. In response to the comment that suggests the use of replacement cost or the

appraised value of the property minus the land, it is the Agencies’ opinion that using other

34 “Designated loan means a loan secured by a building or mobile home that is located or to be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the [National Flood Insurance] Act.” 12 CFR 22.2(e) (OCC); 12 CFR 208.25(b)(4) (Board); 12 CFR 339.2(d) (FDIC); 12 CFR 614.4925(c) (FCA); and 12 CFR 760.2(e) (NCUA) under current regulations.

22

insurance terms to clarify the coverage limit would not reflect what is covered under Federal

flood insurance legislation as accurately as the proposed language. For these reasons, the

Agencies adopt the language as proposed.

___.___ Exemptions

Section 13 of HFIAA, which amends section 102(c) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(c)),

adds a new exemption to the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. Specifically,

HFIAA provides that flood insurance is not required, in the case of any residential property, on

any structure that is a part of such property, but is detached from the primary residential structure

and does not serve as a residence. The October 2014 Proposed Rule would have incorporated

this exemption as provided in HFIAA into the Agencies’ regulations. The Agencies solicited

comment on whether the final rule should clarify certain terms in the provision, such as

“residence” and “residential property.” For instance, the Agencies suggested that there may be

some ambiguity as to when a structure may serve as a residence even if it may not conform to

certain State or local requirements for residential property or when a detached structure should

be deemed a residence. Specifically, the Agencies solicited comment on whether the term

“residential property” should not only refer to the type of property securing the loan, but also to

the loan’s purpose. Thus, the Agencies suggested in the October 2014 Proposed Rule that the

detached structure exemption could be available only if the residence serving as collateral does

not secure a loan made primarily for a business, commercial, or agricultural purpose.

Numerous commenters provided general support for the proposed rule’s implementation

of the exemption for detached structures. Commenters strongly supported providing lenders

with the discretion to exempt low-value non-residential structures from the mandatory purchase

23

obligation. Many commenters requested that the Agencies clarify the meaning of various terms

to assist lenders in applying the exemption and to ensure consistent application of the exemption.

Several commenters asserted that the detached structure exemption should be available

regardless of whether the loan is made for a business, agricultural, or commercial purpose,

contrary to the Agencies’ suggestion. These commenters maintained that lenders should be able

to exclude non-residential detached structures regardless of the loan’s purpose, as long as the

loan is secured by residential property. Numerous commenters, including trade associations,

financial institutions, and individuals, suggested that the final rule should broaden the exemption

to include business, agricultural, and commercial loans and not apply solely to consumer loans.

Commenters noted that loan proceeds may be used for different purposes than that of the

property that secures those proceeds and that section 13 of HFIAA does not limit the exemption

only to consumer loans. Several commenters noted that a borrower who uses a residence to

secure a business, commercial, or agricultural purpose loan faces the same affordability

challenges when required to insure a low-value detached structure as a borrower who uses the

same collateral to secure a consumer loan. One commenter noted that low-value structures are a

common issue for both consumer and commercial borrowers and therefore should be treated

consistently.

The Agencies acknowledge that, with respect to flood insurance, the purpose of a loan

may be immaterial to the borrower when the borrower uses his or her residence to secure the

loan. Therefore, the Agencies agree with commenters that the detached structure exemption

should be available in connection with consumer loans as well as those made for business,

commercial, or agricultural purposes if the loan is secured by a residence.

24

The Agencies considered the various comments concerning the definition of “residential

property.” Several commenters, including trade associations and financial institutions, suggested

that “residential property” should be defined consistently with “residential improved real

estate”35 as defined in the FDPA. Another commenter suggested “residential property” should

be interpreted as a parcel of collateral property containing a 1-4 family building actually used as

a residence. Several commenters suggested the Agencies adopt a definition of “residential

property” that focuses on the structure’s residential use – regardless of its nature or size –

consistent with similar definitions in the FDPA. These commenters believed the term should be

broadly defined to encompass any residential structure, including single-family dwellings, 1-4

family dwellings, multi-family dwellings, and mixed-use buildings as long as the primary

purpose of the building is for a residential purpose. A trade association suggested the Agencies

look to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) lead-based paint regulations

for a definition of “residential property.” One commenter inquired whether the detached

structures exemption excludes all detached structures on a property with a primary residence or

only those the lender deems to be part of the residential property. Lastly, two commenters

believe the final rule should leave the term undefined, similar to the treatment of the term in

other Federal statutes.36

As previously explained, the Agencies have determined that the meaning of the term

“residential property” should not focus on a loan’s purpose. In addition, the Agencies have

determined that using the FDPA definition of “residential improved real estate” would render the

exemption too expansive for its intended purpose because it could result in exempting all

35 The FDPA defines “residential improved real estate” as “improved real estate for which the improvement is a residential building.” 42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)(4). 36 See, e.g., Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. 2602(1)(A); Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1602(w)-(x).

25

commercial or agricultural structures on a property merely because a residence is also located on

the property. The Agencies believe detached structures used for commercial, agricultural, or

other business purposes should be protected adequately by flood insurance as collateral given

their value to the borrower and lender, and should not be covered by the detached structures

exemption.

The Agencies, however, did find the HUD definition of “residential property” to be

helpful.37 The HUD lead-based paint regulation seeks to limit its scope only to properties and

structures used solely for residential purposes, and to exclude land used for agricultural,

commercial, industrial, or other non-residential purposes. The Agencies have determined that

“residential property” in the detached structure exemption should be similar to the HUD

regulation’s definition in that it should apply only to structures for which there is a residential

use and not to structures for which there is a commercial, agricultural, or other business use.

Additionally, the Agencies were guided by Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in

Lending Act (TILA), and its well-established interpretations for further clarification on

residential purpose because TILA generally covers consumer extensions of credit.38 In

particular, Regulation Z applies to credit “primarily for personal, family, or household

purposes.”39 Consistent with Regulation Z, for purposes of the detached structures exemption,

the final rule clarifies that the phrase “a structure that is part of a residential property” refers to a

structure used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, and not used primarily for

agricultural, commercial, industrial, or other business purposes. The Agencies are aware that

37 “Residential property means a dwelling unit, common areas, building exterior surfaces, and any surrounding land, including outbuildings, fences and play equipment affixed to the land, belonging to an owner and available for use by residents, but not including land used for agricultural, commercial, industrial or other non-residential purposes, and not including paint on the pavement of parking lots, garages, or roadways.” 24 CFR 35.110. 38 See 15 U.S.C. 1602(i). 39 See 12 CFR 1026.1(c)(1).

26

certain structures may be used for both residential and business purposes and therefore have

decided to limit the exemption only to structures with a primarily residential purpose.

Furthermore, the final rule makes clear that the exemption applies only to structures that the

lender deems part of the residential property.

Although the Agencies decline to adopt the FDPA’s definition of “residential improved

real estate” for “residential property,” the Agencies agree with commenters that “residential

property” should be interpreted as broadly as “residential improved real estate” as set forth in the

Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance (Q&As). Commenters in

particular referenced Q&A 51, which indicates that “residential improved real estate” does not

distinguish whether a building is single- or multi-family, or owner- or renter-occupied, and

includes single-family dwellings, two- to four-family dwellings, multi-family dwellings

containing five or more residential units, and mixed-use buildings, so long as the building is used

primarily for residential purposes.40

Several commenters also suggested that the Agencies provide further clarification of the

term “detached” and how to interpret the statutory phrase “detached from the primary residential

structure.” One trade association commenter believed “detached” should be defined more

precisely than the Agencies did in the October 2014 Proposed Rule and that a structure joined to

a residence by a covered walkway or breezeway should be treated as a separate, stand-alone

residential structure. Two commenters believed “detached” should be defined as “standing

alone; not joined by any structural connection to any structure to which flood insurance is

required.” Other commenters provided varying definitions of the term as well. The Agencies

agree that a clear definition of “detached” would ensure consistent application by lenders in

40 See 74 FR 35914, 35943 (July 21, 2009).

27

determining which structures qualify for the exemption. Therefore, for purposes of the detached

structure exemption, the Agencies have drafted the final rule to clarify that a structure is

“detached” from the primary residential structure if it is not joined by any structural connection

to the residential structure. That is, a structure is “detached” if it stands alone. This clarification

is consistent with the coverage provision of the NFIP’s Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP)

for additions and extensions to a dwelling unit.

To be exempt from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement, the detached

structure also may not “serve as a residence.” The Agencies received numerous comments on

the necessity for additional clarification on this aspect of the exemption. Some commenters

suggested it would be helpful to describe the features or facilities that, if present, could indicate

that a structure serves as a residence, but ultimately to defer to a lender’s good faith

determination. Several commenters suggested the Agencies provide a bright line test to facilitate

determinations, such as total square footage or assessed value. Some commenters suggested a

bright line test of whether a structure is designed for use as a residence, not how the structure is

being used either at the time of the triggering event or subsequently. One large trade association

suggested that “serve as a residence” be defined to include sleeping, bathroom, and kitchen

facilities, while a large bank commenter asserted that a structure lacking one or more of these

facilities should be deemed non-residential. Another trade association commenter suggested

referring to the definition of “residence” set forth in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

regulations,41 while some commenters referenced other Federal regulations for similar

41 IRS regulations provide that “[w]hether property is a residence shall be determined based on all the facts and circumstances, including the good faith of the taxpayer. A residence generally includes a house, condominium, mobile home, boat, or house trailer, that contains sleeping space and toilet and cooking facilities. A residence does not include personal property, such as furniture or a television, that, in accordance with the applicable local law, is not a fixture.” See 26 CFR 1.163-10T(p)(3)(ii).

28

definitions. Lastly, one commenter suggested a structure must be occupied to be considered a

residence and that a structure intended only for periodic use or that serves as a home office

should not be deemed a residence.

Based on these comments, the Agencies believe it would be beneficial to clarify the

meaning of “serve as a residence.” However, given the numerous types of detached structures

that could serve as a residence, the Agencies find that a single bright line test, for example,

square footage or appraised value, to determine whether a structure serves as a residence, is not

appropriate. Instead, the Agencies have concluded that a more practical approach to applying

this exemption is to rely on the good faith determination of a lender on whether a detached

structure serves as a residence. The Agencies believe the lender is in the best position to

consider all the facts and circumstances involving a detached structure securing a loan, and this

approach is similar to how the IRS evaluates whether property constitutes a “residence.”42 In

making this determination, as suggested by several commenters, the lender should focus on a

structure’s intended use. By focusing on the intended use of the structure, a lender could

determine objectively whether a structure could serve as a residence and therefore not qualify for

the exemption.

The Agencies note that the IRS definition of “residence” provides that a residence

generally contains sleeping, bathroom, and kitchen facilities.43 The Agencies agree that a

structure that serves as a residence would generally have such facilities. Therefore, a lender

could examine the structure for the presence of these facilities to make a determination of

whether it serves as a residence. However, the Agencies decline to accept certain commenters’

suggestions that a structure must contain sleeping, bathroom, and kitchen facilities, and that the 42 See footnote 41. 43 See footnote 41.

29

lack of at least one of these facilities would render the structure non-residential. Detached

structures can vary greatly in terms of size, value, purpose, and facilities. Furthermore, not all

three facilities are necessary in order for a structure to serve as an individual’s residence. For

example, a structure can have sleeping and kitchen facilities, while the resident makes use of a

separate structure as a bathroom facility. Similarly, a structure can have sleeping and bathroom

facilities but lack kitchen facilities. Because a structure without one or more of these facilities

may be intended for use as a residence, the final rule provides that a structure could serve as a

residence if it generally includes sleeping, bathroom, or kitchen facilities.

Moreover, some commenters suggested that the standard for whether a structure serves as

a residence should be its actual use as a residence. The Agencies disagree with employing

“actual use” as the sole indicator of a structure serving as a residence. Such a standard would

exclude homes under construction, vacant rental units, vacant garage apartments, and numerous

other structures from being deemed to serve as a residence. Although the Agencies decline to

accept “actual use” as an appropriate indicator of residency by itself, a lender should take

reasonable steps to determine if a structure is actually occupied by a resident. Therefore, the

Agencies clarify that whether a detached structure in a residential property serves as a residence

shall be based upon the regulated lending institution’s good faith determination that the structure

is intended for use or actually used as a residence.

Additionally, with respect to the “serve as a residence” provision, several commenters,

including financial institutions, trade associations, and an individual, requested that the Agencies

confirm that there is no duty to monitor residential collateral subsequent to the lender’s making,

increasing, renewing, or extending a loan to determine whether an exempt detached structure has

been repurposed to serve as a residence. The Agencies agree that there is no duty to monitor the

30

status of a detached structure following the lender’s initial determination due to the minimal

post-closing communications with borrowers or lack of systematic inspections of the property.

In response to these commenters, the Agencies clarify that a lender must re-examine the status of

a detached structure upon a qualifying triggering event under the FDPA – making, increasing,

renewing, or extending a loan. However, consistent with existing obligations under the FDPA, if

a lender subsequently determines that a property has become subject to the mandatory flood

insurance purchase requirement and, as a result, the collateral is underinsured, the lender has a

duty to inform the borrower of the obligation to increase insurance coverage.44 If the borrower

fails to increase the flood insurance to the appropriate amount, the lender must force place flood

insurance, as required by the FDPA.

Moreover, as the Agencies noted in the October 2014 Proposed Rule, although the

exemption would address borrowers’ and lenders’ concerns by excluding relatively low-value

detached structures from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement if they secure a

designated loan, there may be some detached structures that are of relatively high value, such as

a detached greenhouse. The Agencies further noted that, although the statute does not require

flood insurance for such structures, as a matter of safety and soundness, lenders may nevertheless

require coverage on these detached structures, and that such coverage also may be in the

borrower’s best interest. Furthermore, the Agencies also noted in the October 2014 Proposed

Rule that section 13(b) of HFIAA, which the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has

implemented, amends section 5(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974

(RESPA) to require a related disclosure in the Special Information Booklet provided to

44 42 U.S.C. 4012a(e).

31

borrowers informing them that they may still wish to obtain, and mortgage lenders may still

require borrowers to maintain, flood insurance even if not required by the FDPA.45

Several commenters supported the ability of lenders to require flood insurance for safety

and soundness purposes or if it is in the best interest of the borrower, even if not required by

statute. The Agencies reaffirm that a lender may require flood insurance on a detached structure,

even though the statute does not require it, to protect the lender’s and borrower’s collateral

securing the loan.46

In addition, a trade association suggested the Agencies consider adding language in the

Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance (Notice

of Special Flood Hazards) on the ability of a lender to waive flood insurance requirements for

detached structures because some borrowers might not receive the Special Information

Booklet.47 The Agencies believe that the commenter’s suggestion has merit and have

determined that it also would be appropriate to amend the notice to include the related disclosure

required by section 13(b) of HFIAA. This additional disclosure is intended to ensure that

borrowers receive full disclosure on this aspect of flood insurance coverage, as discussed below

in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION related to Appendices A & B.

Finally, the Agencies are adopting a change to their regulations in this section to amend

the reference to the head of FEMA from “Director” to “Administrator” as discussed above in the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION related to ___.___ Authority, purpose, and scope.

45 See 80 FR 17414 (Apr. 1, 2015). 46 See section 13(b) of HFIAA. 47 The Special Information Booklet is provided only to borrowers who submit a written application for a Federally related mortgage loan. See 12 CFR 1024.6(a).

32

___.___ Escrow requirement

In General

The Agencies proposed to revise their regulations in the October 2014 Proposed Rule in

accordance with section 102(d) of the FDPA (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)), as amended by section 25 of

HFIAA,48 to require a regulated lending institution, or a servicer acting on behalf of a regulated

lending institution, to escrow all premiums and fees for flood insurance required for loans

secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home unless the loan or the lending

institution qualifies for one of the statutory exceptions. In addition, under the October 2014

Proposed Rule, these premiums and fees would be payable with the same frequency as payments

on the loan are made for the duration of the loan. Several commenters, including a municipal

government commenter, supported the escrow requirement, although some financial institution

commenters opposed the requirement. As escrows are required by the statute, the Agencies are

adopting a final rule that will implement the escrow requirement in section 102(d) of the FDPA,

as amended.

Consistent with section 25(b) of HFIAA, the Agencies proposed that the escrow

requirement would apply to any loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile

home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016. Although

section 25(b) of HFIAA applies the escrow requirement to loans “originated, refinanced,

increased, extended, or renewed,” the Agencies proposed regulatory language in the October

48 As discussed above, the Agencies note that section 25(b)(3) of HFIAA provides that these new escrow requirements will not supersede the current escrow provisions during the period beginning on July 6, 2012 and ending on December 31, 2015. Therefore, as provided under section 25(b)(3) of HFIAA, the escrow requirements under section 102(d)(1) of the FDPA in effect on July 5, 2012 will continue to remain in effect and be enforced by the Agencies until December 31, 2015. Each Agency’s current escrow provision provides that a regulated lending institution must escrow all premiums and fees for required flood insurance if the institution requires the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums, fees or other charges. See 12 CFR 22.5 and 172.5 (OCC); 12 CFR 208.25(e) (Board); 12 CFR 339.5 (FDIC); 12 CFR 614.4935 (FCA); and 12 CFR 760.5 (NCUA).

33

2014 Proposed Rule that applies the requirement to loans “made, increased, extended, or

renewed” to be consistent with the way these triggering events are referenced elsewhere in the

regulation.49 Several commenters agreed with the Agencies’ proposal, and the Agencies adopt

this non-substantive wording change in the final rule.

One financial institution commenter suggested that the Agencies’ regulations be amended

to reference “designated” loans because that is a defined term for loans that are subject to the

mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. The commenter also recommended that the

regulation be amended to state that the escrow payments be payable with the same frequency as

payments on the loan are “required to be” made for the duration of the loan because such

wording would be technically accurate. The Agencies agree with these suggested changes, and

the final rule adopts the changes recommended by the commenter.

Several financial institution and trade association commenters suggested that the

Agencies apply the escrow requirement to loan applications received on or after January 1, 2016.

These commenters stated that loan applications could be received prior to January 1, 2016, but

may not close before January 1, 2016. Thus, these commenters suggested, these loans may

initially be designated as non-escrow loans, but if they close on or after January 1, 2016, lenders

will have to re-categorize these loans as loans requiring the escrow of flood insurance premiums

and fees. The Agencies note that the statute specifically and clearly applies the escrow

requirement to loans that experience a triggering event on or after January 1, 2016. Furthermore,

the Agencies believe that lenders have the capability to anticipate whether loan applications

submitted prior to January 1, 2016 may close on or after January 1, 2016 and thus should

49 See, e.g., 12 CFR 22.3(a) (OCC); 12 CFR 208.25(c)(1) (Board); 12 CFR 339.3(a) (FDIC); 12 CFR 614.4930(a) (FCA); and 12 CFR 760.3(a) (NCUA).

34

structure those transactions accordingly. Therefore, the Agencies decline to make the change

suggested by these commenters.

Another financial institution commenter requested that the Agencies clarify that a flood

map change on or after January 1, 2016 that causes a building, which had not previously been

located in an SFHA, to be located in an SFHA would not impose a duty on a lender to begin

escrowing flood insurance premiums and fees for a loan that is secured by such building.

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended, applies to loans that experience a triggering event on

or after January 1, 2016. Because a map change is not a triggering event, lenders would not be

required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees based solely on that change.

Finally, some credit union association commenters recommended that the escrow status

be detailed on an insurance declarations page and that changes in escrow status should be

reported to insurance companies who should, in turn, notify all lienholders and homeowners of

changes in escrow. The Agencies note that the FDPA, as amended, does not address how

insurance companies compose their declarations pages or when and how they must notify

lienholders and homeowners regarding escrow status. Accordingly, the Agencies decline to

make that requested change.

Loan-Related Exceptions

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by section 25 of HFIAA, contains several

exceptions to the general escrow requirement. These exceptions include: (i) loans that are in a

subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same property for which flood insurance is

being provided; (ii) loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is

part of a condominium, cooperative, or other project development, provided certain conditions

are met; (iii) loans that are secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is

35

used as collateral for a business purpose; (iv) home equity lines of credit; (v) nonperforming

loans; and (vi) loans with terms not longer than 12 months. These exceptions are in addition to

the small lender exception applicable to certain regulated lending institutions that have total

assets of less than $1 billion set forth in section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by section

100209 of Biggert-Waters, discussed below. Numerous commenters supported these exceptions.

Although the Agencies proposed the exceptions largely as provided in HFIAA, the

Agencies did propose some clarifications in the October 2014 Proposed Rule. With respect to

the exception for loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is used

as collateral for a business purpose, the Agencies proposed that the exception apply to a loan that

is an extension of credit primarily for a business, commercial, or agricultural purpose.

Commenters supported the Agencies’ clarification regarding the business purpose loan

exception. Some commenters, however, recommended that the Agencies provide further

guidance on the exception. Some commenters suggested that the Agencies specifically adopt or

refer to the interpretations in Regulation Z, which implements TILA, on the meaning of

“primarily for a business, commercial, or agricultural purpose.”50

The Agencies are adopting the exception on business, commercial, or agricultural

purpose loans as proposed. As the Agencies explained in the October 2014 Proposed Rule, this

is identical to language the Agencies initially proposed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule,

which commenters to the October 2013 Proposed Rule supported. As discussed in the October

2013 Proposed Rule and noted in the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the Agencies specifically

50 One credit union association commenter inquired whether a loan for residential investment properties would be considered a loan that is “primarily for business, agricultural or commercial purposes.” The Agencies note that Regulation Z contains commentary that addresses this question. See comments 3 and 4 under 12 CFR 1026.3(a).

36

proposed this language to be consistent with similar exemptions in RESPA51 and TILA.52 There

is a long history of established guidance on the meaning of “primarily for a business,

commercial, or agricultural purpose,” including the interpretations set forth in Regulation Z and

associated commentary. Consequently, the Agencies do not believe further interpretations or an

explicit referral to Regulation Z is necessary; however, the Agencies intend that those

interpretations be used as guidance in connection with this provision.

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by section 25 of HFIAA, also includes an

exception for a loan in a junior or subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same

residential improved real estate or mobile home for which flood insurance is being provided at

the time of the origination of the loan. The Agencies proposed language in the October 2014

Proposed Rule similar to the language in HFIAA for this exception, with some changes to

improve readability and clarity. Commenters supported the Agencies’ proposed clarifications.

Some commenters, however, suggested that the exception be available for subordinate

lienholders regardless of whether there is already coverage in place because determining such

coverage can be difficult. The Agencies note that HFIAA explicitly provides that the exception

is only available for subordinate loans secured by property for which flood insurance is already

in place. Furthermore, the Agencies note that, as discussed in the Q&As at Q&A 36, regulated

lending institutions are already expected to inquire as to the amount of flood insurance coverage

that is in place when they make, increase, extend, or renew a subordinate lien loan.53

Accordingly, the Agencies are adopting the exception as proposed.

51 See 12 U.S.C. 2606(a). 52 See 15 U.S.C. 1603(1). 53 See 74 FR 35914, 35940-41 (July 21, 2009).

37

Several commenters also requested that the Agencies clarify whether a lender has a duty

to monitor its lien position over the life of the loan to determine whether the loan qualifies for the

subordinate lien exception. As discussed further below, the Agencies do not believe there is an

ongoing duty to evaluate the applicability of the subordinate lien exception, or any of the other

exceptions. However, similar to the force placement provisions relating to the mandatory flood

insurance purchase requirement, the Agencies believe that when a lender makes a determination

that the subordinate lien exception no longer applies, for example, when it receives notice that

the senior lien has been paid off or when it conducts the required inquiry at a triggering event,

then the lender must begin escrowing flood insurance premiums and fees. Therefore, lenders

should ensure that the loan documents executed in connection with a subordinate loan permit the

lender to require an escrow in connection with the loan in the event the loan takes a first lien

position and becomes subject to the escrow requirement.

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by section 25 of HFIAA, also excepts from the

escrow requirement loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is

part of a condominium, cooperative, or other project development when covered by a flood

insurance policy that: (i) meets the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement; (ii) is

provided by the condominium association, cooperative, homeowners association or other

applicable group; and (iii) the premium for which is paid by the condominium association,

cooperative, homeowners association, or other applicable group as a common expense. The

Agencies proposed in the October 2014 Proposed Rule to implement this exception substantially

as stated in the statute.

As the Agencies discussed in both the October 2013 Proposed Rule and the October 2014

Proposed Rule, if the amount of the policy purchased by the condominium association,

38

cooperative, homeowners association, or other applicable group does not satisfy the mandatory

flood insurance purchase requirement, then the borrower would be required to obtain a

supplemental policy to cover the deficiency. In those instances, the Agencies expect the

regulated lending institution to escrow the premiums and fees for the supplemental policy unless

the small lender exception applies. For example, if a condominium association purchases an

NFIP Residential Condominium Building Association Policy (RCBAP) or a private flood

insurance policy for less than the amount of insurance required by the mandatory purchase

requirement under the FDPA, the borrower must obtain a dwelling policy for supplemental

coverage.

Commenters were generally supportive of the exception as included in the October 2014

Proposed Rule. One community association commenter suggested that the Agencies require

insurance companies to disclose the beneficial owner of a policy. However, the FDPA does not

compel insurance companies to disclose the beneficial owner of a policy. The Agencies are

adopting the condominium association, cooperative, and homeowners association exception as

proposed in the October 2014 Proposed Rule.

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by section 25 of HFIAA, includes an exception

from the escrow requirement for home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), which was an exception

requested by many commenters on the October 2013 Proposed Rule. The Agencies proposed

this exception, consistent with HFIAA, in the October 2014 Proposed Rule. One consumer

group commenter suggested that the Agencies exclude fully drawn HELOCs from the exception

on the theory that such loans are really closed-end loans disguised as HELOCs to qualify for the

exception and evade other mortgage requirements. The Agencies note that the FDPA, as

amended by section 25 of HFIAA, does not include any exclusion to the exception. Moreover,

39

the issue of whether credit qualifies as open-end credit is addressed by Regulation Z.54

Therefore, the Agencies are adopting the exception as proposed.

Section 102(d) of the FDPA, as amended by section 25 of HFIAA, also includes an

exception from the escrow requirement for nonperforming loans. The Agencies proposed to

implement this exception with a clarification that the exception be available for a nonperforming

loan that is 90 or more days past due and solicited comment on the clarification. Several

commenters supported the Agencies’ clarification. Other commenters, however, requested that

the Agencies look to the CFPB’s foreclosure and servicing rules or the FCA’s rules on

categorizing assets for accounting and reporting purposes in 12 CFR 621.6. In addition, many

commenters suggested that once a designated loan is 90 or more days past due, it should not lose

the exception if the borrower makes additional payments.

Based on these comments, the Agencies believe further clarification is required regarding

this exception. Although it appears that 90 or more days past due is an appropriate measure of

when a loan is nonperforming and is consistent with many lenders’ current practices, there is

confusion on when a nonperforming loan may become a performing loan that is no longer

entitled to the exception. The Agencies generally agree that a borrower making some additional

payments would not render a nonperforming loan a performing loan; however, the Agencies

believe some guidance is necessary to help lenders determine when a loan is no longer

nonperforming. Therefore, the Agencies are adopting language that is adapted from the FCA’s

regulations on categorizing assets55 to provide that a nonperforming loan is a loan that is 90 or

more days past due and remains nonperforming until it is permanently modified or until the

54 See 12 CFR 1026.2(a)(20) and associated commentary. 55 See 12 CFR 621.6(c).

40

entire amount past due, including principal, accrued interest, and penalty interest incurred as the

result of past due status, is collected or otherwise discharged in full.

The final exception provided by section 25 of HFIAA is for a loan that has a term of not

longer than 12 months, which the Agencies proposed as provided by the statute. Several

financial institution commenters suggested that the term of the exception be extended to 15

months or 24 months to include all construction loans. The Agencies note the statute provides an

exception only for loans with a term of 12 months or less, and therefore, the exception is adopted

as proposed. However, if a loan of 12 months or less is extended or renewed for an additional

term of 12 months or less, the Agencies’ regulations would permit the exception to apply to the

extended or renewed loan because an extension or renewal is a triggering event. Therefore, at

the time of the triggering event, the regulated lending institution may apply the exception if the

term of the newly extended or renewed loan is for a term of 12 months or less.

Moreover, the Agencies are adding new language to address questions the Agencies

received about the duration of an exception to the escrow requirement. These questions were

raised particularly with respect to exceptions based on a loan status that could change, such as

the subordinate lien and nonperforming loan exceptions. Given the ambiguity in the FDPA, as

amended, regarding how the exceptions would apply, the final rule clarifies that if a regulated

lending institution, or its servicer, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan

secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended,

or renewed on or after January 1, 2016, that an exception does not apply, then the lender or its

servicer shall require the escrow of all flood insurance premiums and fees as soon as reasonably

practicable. In addition, consistent with section 102(d)(3) of the FDPA, which states that escrow

accounts established by section 102(d) of the FDPA shall be subject to section 10 of RESPA, the

41

rule provides that a regulated lending institution must provide any disclosure required by section

10 of RESPA if such loan is otherwise subject to RESPA. The Agencies modeled this language

on the force placement provisions for the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. As

with the force placement provisions, the Agencies do not believe this imposes a duty to monitor

the exception. However, if the regulated lending institution becomes aware that the status of the

loan has changed, then the Agencies expect that the lender should take action, similar to the

Agencies’ expectations in the force placement context.

The Agencies also received several requests for additional exceptions from the escrow

requirements. Some commenters suggested that the Agencies add an exception for closed-end

home equity loans in a senior lien position of $100,000 or less or with a loan-to-value ratio of 60

percent or less. Another commenter suggested adding an exception for any loan with a loan-to-

value ratio of 80 percent or less. An additional commenter suggested that the Agencies provide

an exception for force-placed loans. Some farm credit commenters also requested that the

Agencies provide an exception for loans with nontraditional payment structures such as semi-

annual or annual payment schedules. The Agencies note that none of these exceptions are

provided for in the FDPA, as amended, and therefore decline to add them.

In addition, a financial institution commenter requested that the Agencies create an

exception for reverse mortgages. This commenter stated that it is not possible to align the

frequency of escrow payments with loan payments because a borrower makes no payments on a

reverse mortgage. The Agencies agree that given the terms of a reverse mortgage, such loans are

already excluded based on the plain language of the escrow requirement, which requires lenders

to collect flood insurance premiums and fees with the same frequency as payments on the loan

42

are made. As a borrower makes no payments on a reverse mortgage, the lender is not required to

escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for such loans.

Notice

The Agencies proposed that a regulated lending institution, or a servicer acting on its

behalf, mail or deliver a written notice informing a borrower that it is required to escrow all

premiums and fees for required flood insurance on residential improved real estate. As noted in

the October 2014 Proposed Rule, this proposal was similar to the notice requirement proposed in

the October 2013 Proposed Rule. The purpose of the proposed notice was to ensure that

borrowers are informed about the requirement to escrow premiums and fees for mandatory flood

insurance.

As the Agencies explained in the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the proposal would

require that a regulated lending institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, provide a notice on

the escrow requirement with, or in, a notice the lender is already required to provide: the Notice

of Special Flood Hazards. The Agencies proposed this approach in order to minimize the burden

to regulated lending institutions of providing this notice and to ensure that borrowers receive the

notice at a time when they are considering the purchase of flood insurance. The Agencies’

current rules provide a sample form of this notice as Appendix A. Because HFIAA amendments

tie the escrow requirement to a triggering event (i.e., when a loan is made, increased, extended,

or renewed), borrowers already will receive the Notice of Special Flood Hazards, as required by

the Agencies’ regulations, at the same time that the escrow of flood insurance premiums and fees

will be required. To facilitate compliance, the Agencies proposed model language for the escrow

notice to be included in or with the Notice of Special Flood Hazards, as applicable.

43

One commenter supported the proposed requirement to include the notice with the Notice

of Special Flood Hazards. The final rule continues to include the escrow notice with the Notice

of Special Flood Hazards.

The Agencies are making one modification to the escrow notice requirement in the

October 2014 Proposed Rule. As discussed above with respect to the duration of the exception,

the Agencies are clarifying that a regulated lending institution or its servicer must require the

escrow of all flood insurance premiums and fees if the lender, or a servicer acting on the lender’s

behalf, determines at any time during the term of a loan that an exception to the escrow

requirement for the loan no longer applies. To alert borrowers to the potential need to escrow in

those circumstances, the Agencies also are requiring lenders to provide the escrow notice in

connection with any excepted loan that could lose its exception during the term of the loan.

Consequently, borrowers of loans that may eventually become subject to the escrow requirement

will be informed of that possibility.

The Agencies also received some comments related to the content of the notice. These

comments will be addressed below in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

accompanying the discussion on Appendices A & B.

Small Lender Exception

In addition to the exceptions to the escrow requirement discussed above, section 102(d)

of the FDPA, as amended by section 100209 of Biggert-Waters, contains an exception for certain

small lenders. The FDPA, as amended, states that, except as provided by State law, regulated

lending institutions that have total assets of less than $1 billion are excepted from the escrow

requirement if, on or before July 6, 2012, the institution: (i) in the case of a loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home, was not required under Federal or State law to

44

deposit taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire

term of the loan and (ii) did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit

of taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for loans secured

by residential improved real estate or a mobile home. The Agencies proposed to implement this

exception to the escrow requirement substantially as provided in the statute with some

clarifications.

One of these clarifications addressed the measurement of the asset size to qualify for the

exception, which the Agencies proposed in both the October 2013 Proposed Rule and the

October 2014 Proposed Rule. Because Biggert-Waters does not specify a point in time to

measure the asset size of an institution to determine whether such institution qualifies for the

exception, the Agencies proposed that a regulated lending institution may qualify for the

exception if it has total assets of less than $1 billion as of December 31 of either of the two prior

calendar years. Consequently, regulated lending institutions with assets of $1 billion or more as

of both December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2015, would not qualify for the exception in

2016. In contrast, a regulated lending institution with assets of less than $1 billion as of either

December 31, 2014, or December 31, 2015, would qualify for the exception in 2016, provided

the other conditions for the exception are met. As the Agencies explained in both the October

2013 Proposed Rule and the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the Agencies proposed this method,

which is similar to how the OCC, the Board, and the FDIC have measured asset size in relation

to the definitions for small entities under their Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)

regulations,56 to ensure an institution remains above the size threshold for a substantial period

56 See 12 CFR 25.12(u) and 195.12(u) (OCC); 12 CFR 228.12(u) (Board); and 12 CFR 345.12(u) (FDIC).

45

before requiring the institution to expend the resources necessary to establish a new escrow

program.

Similar to comments received on the October 2013 Proposed Rule, some financial

institution commenters to the October 2014 Proposed Rule suggested that the Agencies set the

threshold at $2 billion in assets to be consistent with the CFPB escrow rules under Regulation Z

for higher-priced mortgage loans.57 A credit union association commenter suggested that the

Agencies adjust the threshold annually for inflation. As the Agencies noted in the October 2014

Proposed Rule, the $1 billion asset-size threshold for the exception from the escrow requirements

is specified in the FDPA, as amended, and the Agencies are therefore adopting the $1 billion

asset-size threshold without an annual adjustment, consistent with the FDPA, as amended.

Some commenters also asked whether the assets to be measured applied per institution or

whether the assets of all institutions under common ownership must be aggregated. The

Agencies’ regulations state that the measurement reflects the assets of only the regulated lending

institution. As a result, regulated lending institutions need not consolidate the assets of other

institutions under common ownership with the regulated lending institution for the measurement

of asset size.

The Agencies also proposed transition rules for a change in status of a regulated lending

institution that may initially qualify for the exception, but later grows to exceed the $1 billion

asset-size threshold. Specifically, the Agencies proposed to give regulated lending institutions

approximately six months to begin complying with the escrow requirement, which the Agencies

explained in both the October 2013 Proposed Rule and October 2014 Proposed Rule is similar to

57 See 12 CFR 1026.35(b)(2)(iii)(C).

46

the Board’s Regulation II change in status rules.58 Under the proposal, a regulated lending

institution would be required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for any loans made,

increased, extended, or renewed on or after July 1 of the succeeding calendar year after a

regulated lending institution has a change in status. Therefore, under the proposed rule, if a

regulated lending institution qualified for the exception in 2016, but had assets of $1 billion or

more as of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017, such regulated lending institution would

be required to begin escrowing for any loans made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after

July 1, 2018. The final rule similarly would require regulated lending institutions that have had a

change in status to begin escrowing for any loans made, increased, extended, or renewed on or

after July 1 of the first calendar year of changed status. The Agencies have clarified the

language in the final rule with no intended change in meaning.

Several financial institution trade association commenters suggested that lenders be given

12 months to comply with the escrow requirements after a change in status. The Agencies

believe that this would be too long a period for lenders to comply in light of the Agencies’

regulations measuring the lender’s assets over a period of two years. Thus, a lender who has had

assets of $1 billion or more one year and is on track during the second year to have assets of $1

billion or more should begin to prepare escrowing in the following year. In the Agencies’ view,

requiring such lenders to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for loans made, increased,

extended, or renewed on or after July 1 after the lender has had a change in status should be

sufficient time for the lenders to comply.

The Agencies also received questions from commenters on whether an institution that

experienced a change in status, which no longer qualifies it for the small lender exception, could

58 See 12 CFR 235.5(a)(3).

47

regain the small lender exception if the institution’s asset size decreased to less than $1 billion in

a calendar year. Based on the Agencies’ regulation, a regulated lending institution could

technically reclaim small lender status in these circumstances. However, given the burden that a

regulated lending institution would undertake to establish an escrow program, the Agencies

question whether an institution would find it appropriate to abandon a program in which it has

invested resources to develop and risk causing confusion to borrowers who have grown

accustomed to escrowing flood insurance premiums and fees, especially if the institution could

lose the small lender exception again in the future.

The FDPA, as amended, states that the small lender exception is available only if, on or

before July 6, 2012, the institution: (i) was not required under Federal or State law to deposit

taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire term of

the loan, in the case of a loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home; and

(ii) did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes, insurance

premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for loans secured by residential

improved real estate or a mobile home.

The Agencies proposed clarifications to these conditions in the October 2014 Proposed

Rule based on comments received on the October 2013 Proposed Rule. Specifically, the

Agencies proposed that if, on or before July 6, 2012, the institution: (i) was not required under

Federal or State law to deposit taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an

escrow account for the entire term of any loan secured by residential improved real estate or a

mobile home; and (ii) did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of

taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for any loans secured

by residential improved real estate or a mobile home, the institution may be eligible for the small

48

lender exception provided it meets the size threshold. The Agencies are adopting this language

in the final rule.

A farm credit commenter suggested that the conditions should only apply to an

institution’s consumer loan portfolio. The Agencies note that the statute applies the conditions to

any loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home. Therefore, based on the

plain language of the FDPA, as amended, and the Agencies’ regulations, the institution should

include all loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home, regardless of

whether the loan is for a consumer purpose. Some commenters, including several farm credit

commenters, suggested that instead of adopting the conditions set forth in the FDPA, the

Agencies develop a bright line test, for example less than 100 mortgages per year or 200 loans

per year or 5 percent of the institution’s portfolio, to determine whether or not an institution has a

policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or

any other charges in an escrow account. The Agencies do not believe these limits would be

consistent with the FDPA and decline to adopt such standards.

The Agencies also received several questions about the conditions, which the Agencies

believe can be resolved by looking to the plain language of the FDPA, as adopted and

implemented by the Agencies’ regulations. A financial institution trade group commenter asked

whether a lender who began a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes,

insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account after July 6, 2012 could still

qualify for the small lender exception. Based on the FDPA and the Agencies’ regulations, which

reference a lender’s policy on or before July 6, 2012, an institution could qualify for the

exception if the policy of requiring escrow began after July 6, 2012, provided the lender meets

the size threshold. Commenters also requested clarification on whether the small lender

49

exception is available if the lender maintains escrows only on a borrower’s request or if the

policy of consistently and uniformly requiring escrow accounts comes at the behest of a third

party. Regarding the former situation, the Agencies note that the FDPA and the Agencies’

regulations state that the condition is based on a lender having a policy of requiring the escrow

accounts. Therefore, if the lender is only maintaining escrows based on borrowers’ requests, the

Agencies do not believe this to be a policy of uniformly or consistently requiring escrow. With

respect to the situation involving a third party, the Agencies believe that under the FDPA and the

Agencies’ regulations, it is irrelevant why the lender is requiring the escrow so long as there is a

policy of uniformly or consistently requiring borrowers to escrow.

Option to Escrow

Section 25(b) of HFIAA requires regulated lending institutions to offer and make

available to a borrower the option to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for loans secured

by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that are outstanding as of January 1, 2016.

The Agencies proposed this provision in the October 2014 Proposed Rule generally as provided

in the statute with changes to the language for clarity and organization. Consistent with section

25(b) of HFIAA, the proposal also clarified that providing an option to escrow would not apply

to loans or lenders that are excepted from the general escrow requirement.

Commenters were generally supportive of the Agencies’ proposal on the option to

escrow. Some credit union and credit union trade group commenters, however, opposed

requiring lenders to offer an option to escrow for loans outstanding on January 1, 2016. The

Agencies note that offering an option to escrow is required by section 25(b) of HFIAA. As a

result, the Agencies are adopting a requirement to offer an option to escrow, consistent with

HFIAA.

50

Several commenters supported the Agencies’ proposal stating that the option to escrow

does not apply to loans or lenders that are excepted from the general escrow requirement. Many

commenters requested the Agencies to clarify that the status of the loan as of the “outstanding”

date should determine whether the lender must send the notice of the option to escrow. For

example, if a loan outstanding as of January 1, 2016 is a subordinate lien loan excepted from the

escrow requirement, then a lender that is not subject to the small lender exception need not

provide the notice of the option to escrow even if the lien status for such loan could subsequently

change. The Agencies agree that this is consistent with section 25(b) of HFIAA, which requires

a regulated lending institution to offer and make available an option to escrow for loans

outstanding as of January 1, 2016, and therefore, the status of the loan as of January 1, 2016

should determine whether the requirement to offer and make available an option to escrow

applies.

The Agencies also received several comments on providing additional exceptions for the

option to escrow requirement. Several commenters suggested that there should be an exception

to offering an option to escrow for borrowers that already are escrowing. The Agencies agree

section 25(b) of HFIAA provides an exception for certain loans that are already escrowing.59

Furthermore, the Agencies do not find any reason for a borrower who is already escrowing to

receive a notice of the option to escrow. Consequently, the Agencies are adding language to

their regulations to clarify that the option to escrow does not apply to an outstanding loan with a

related escrow of flood insurance premiums and fees, or to a loan that is already subject to the

59 Section 25(b)(1)(B) of HFIAA states that the term “outstanding loan” to which the option to escrow requirement applies includes a loan that is not subject to the requirement to escrow premiums and fees for flood insurance under section 102(d)(1) of the FDPA in effect on July 5, 2012. Therefore, if a loan is already escrowing pursuant to section 102(d)(1) of the FDPA in effect on July 5, 2012, it is not an outstanding loan that must be offered an option to escrow.

51

escrow requirement. Therefore, if a loan is outstanding on January 1, 2016, for example, and

subsequently experiences a triggering event on February 1, 2016 so that the lender must begin

escrowing flood insurance premiums and fees for such loan, the lender need not provide the

option to escrow notice to the borrower.

Commenters also requested that the Agencies exclude loans for which borrowers have

previously waived escrow or for which lenders previously offered an option to escrow from

having to offer the option to escrow again. The Agencies decline to include such exceptions.

Although a borrower may have previously decided to waive escrow or been offered an option to

escrow, it is possible that the borrower’s circumstances have changed, and if offered another

chance to escrow, the borrower may do so. Moreover, including such exceptions would be

inconsistent with section 25(b) of HFIAA.

Furthermore, the Agencies proposed in the October 2014 Proposed Rule to use their

authority to implement the escrow requirement to mandate that regulated lending institutions that

no longer qualify for the small lender exception provide the option to escrow for borrowers of

loans outstanding on July 1 of the succeeding calendar year following the lender’s change in

status. For example, suppose a loan is made on March 1, 2016, by a regulated lending institution

that qualifies for the exception for small lenders. If the lender then no longer qualifies for the

exception for small lenders as of January 1, 2018, under the Agencies’ regulations, the lender

would be required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees for loans made, increased,

extended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2018. The lender would have the capability to escrow

flood insurance premiums and fees on July 1, 2018, and could provide that service to the

borrower of the March 1, 2016 loan. Consequently, under the Agencies’ October 2014 Proposed

52

Rule, the regulated lending institution would be required to offer the borrower of that loan the

option to escrow.

A few credit union and farm credit commenters opposed the Agencies’ proposal while a

consumer group commenter supported the proposal. Several financial institution and financial

institution trade association commenters did not oppose applying the option to escrow

requirement to institutions that lose the small lender exception, but stated that additional time

may be needed for such institutions to comply. The Agencies continue to believe that a

regulated lending institution that no longer qualifies for the small lender exception should be

required to provide an option to escrow. Because a regulated lending institution that experiences

a change in status will be required to establish an escrow program, borrowers on existing loans

should benefit from the institution’s program and be offered the option to escrow. Therefore, the

Agencies are adopting the proposed regulations to require regulated lending institutions that lose

the small lender exception to offer the option to escrow to existing borrowers with outstanding

loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home as of its compliance date.

In the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the Agencies also proposed additional clarifications

to provide more specific guidance to regulated lending institutions in administering this

requirement. First, the Agencies proposed to implement the requirement that regulated lending

institutions “offer and make available” the option to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees

by requiring that for outstanding loans, a lender, or its servicer, mail or deliver, or provide

electronically if the borrower agrees, a notice informing borrowers of the option to escrow by

March 31, 2016. For lenders that no longer qualify for the small lender exception, the Agencies

proposed that the notice informing borrowers of the option to escrow be provided by September

30 of the succeeding calendar year following the lender’s change in status.

53

Several financial institution and trade group commenters stated that requiring notice for

outstanding loans by March 31, 2016 provided sufficient time for regulated lending institutions

to comply. There were, however, some commenters that suggested the notice be required by

January 1, 2017, because certain institutions must manually identify outstanding loans for which

the notice on the option to escrow must be provided. The Agencies believe that providing

institutions with one year to comply is too long, but that additional time may be warranted.

Consequently, the Agencies are amending their proposed rule to require that the option to escrow

notice should be provided by June 30, 2016.

Some commenters also requested additional time for providing the option to escrow

notice for lenders that lose the small lender exception. The Agencies proposed that the notice be

provided by September 30 of the succeeding calendar year following the lender’s change in

status. Thus, such an institution would have nine months from the time it loses the exception to

send the option to escrow notice. The Agencies believe that nine months provides an adequate

amount of time for such institutions to identify borrowers of outstanding loans and mail or

deliver the notice and are therefore adopting the September 30 compliance date. The Agencies,

however, have revised the language of the final rule to clarify that a lender that has had a change

in status must provide the notice of the option to escrow by September 30 of the first calendar

year in which it has had a change in status.

Second, the Agencies proposed to require a lender or its servicer to begin escrowing

premiums and fees for flood insurance as soon as reasonably practicable after the lender or

servicer receives the borrower’s request to escrow. As the Agencies explained in the October

2014 Proposed Rule, this language was derived from similar requirements in Regulation E60 and

60 See 12 CFR 1005.17(f).

54

Regulation Z61 regarding how soon a financial institution or credit card issuer must implement

the revocation of an opt-in for overdraft services or an over-the-limit feature of a credit card,

respectively.

Several commenters supported the Agencies’ proposal, noting that regulated lending

institutions have had experience with the “as soon as reasonably practicable” standard under

Regulation E and Regulation Z and that no greater specificity in the language is necessary.

Some commenters requested further guidance on when lenders must begin escrowing after a

borrower’s request. Given that the Agencies believe a standard timeline may be difficult to

establish for different institutions, and in light of the experience that regulated lending

institutions already have with the “as soon as reasonably practicable” concept under Regulation

E and Regulation Z, the Agencies are adopting the provision as proposed.

Third, to facilitate compliance, the Agencies proposed a model clause for the notice on

the option to escrow in Appendix B. The Agencies’ model clause for the option to escrow notice

and the comments the Agencies received in connection with this proposal, will be discussed in

more detail below in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION to Appendices A & B.

___.___ Required use of standard flood hazard determination form

In connection with the detached structures exemption in section 102(c) of the FDPA,

made by section 13 of HFIAA, discussed above, the Agencies proposed in the October 2014

Proposed Rule to amend the Agencies’ regulations to clarify that a regulated lending institution

need not perform a flood hazard determination for any properties or structures that are exempt

from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement. The Agencies reasoned that because

flood insurance is not required on such properties and structures, determining whether such

61 See 12 CFR 1026.56(i).

55

structures are located in an SFHA is unnecessary, and that removing this requirement for such

properties and structures would eliminate unnecessary fees charged to borrowers.

Several commenters criticized this proposed amendment. They suggested the Agencies

clarify that, although a lender need not perform a flood hazard determination for any properties

exempt from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement, a lender still may need to

obtain a flood hazard determination and charge a fee for the determination even if the property or

structure qualifies for the exemption. Two commenters noted that lenders generally are not

aware of detached structures until the flood hazard determination lists the number of buildings

located on a property or until an appraisal or survey, occurring after the lender has ordered a

determination, identifies the detached structures.

The Agencies agree with these commenters that conducting a flood hazard determination

may be necessary to ascertain the number of buildings located on the property. In addition, the

lender otherwise may not be aware that there is a detached structure until after a flood hazard

determination is ordered. Therefore, conducting a flood hazard determination remains necessary

to ensure compliance with the flood insurance requirements. Accordingly, the final rule does not

include the proposed exception to the flood hazard determination requirement for properties and

structures exempt from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement.

Finally, the October 2013 Proposed Rule proposed technical amendments in this section

to change the reference to the head of FEMA from “Director” to “Administrator” and to update

how a lending institution may obtain the standard flood hazard insurance form by directing the

institution to FEMA’s Web site. No comments were received on this aspect of the proposal.

The Agencies therefore adopt the change in title of the head of FEMA from “Director” to

“Administrator” and the addition of the Web site reference as proposed.

56

___.___ Force placement of flood insurance.

Pursuant to section 102(e) of the FDPA, as amended by section 100244 of Biggert-

Waters, the Agencies proposed to amend their rules for the force placement of flood insurance.62

The October 2013 Proposed Rule sought to implement section 100244 of Biggert-Waters by

setting forth when a regulated lending institution or its servicer may begin to charge the borrower

for force-placed insurance, the circumstances under which a regulated lending institution or its

servicer must terminate force-placed insurance and refund payments, and what documentary

evidence is sufficient to demonstrate that a borrower has flood insurance coverage.

Notice and purchase of coverage.

Under current regulations, if a regulated lending institution, or a servicer acting on its

behalf, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan that the building or mobile

home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered by flood insurance

or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required under the FDPA,

then the regulated lending institution or its servicer must notify the borrower that the borrower

should obtain flood insurance, at the borrower’s expense, in an amount at least equal to the

amount required under the mandatory purchase requirement, for the remaining term of the

designated loan. If the borrower fails to obtain adequate flood insurance within 45 days after

notification, then the regulated lending institution or its servicer must purchase flood insurance

on behalf of the borrower. The regulated lending institution or servicer may charge the borrower

for the cost of the premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance. Pursuant to section

102(e) of the FDPA, as amended by section 100244 of Biggert-Waters, the Agencies proposed to

62 The Agencies note that section 1463(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act sets forth requirements relating to the force placement of hazard insurance. The CFPB has excluded flood insurance required under the FDPA from the force placement requirements in its rule implementing this provision. 12 CFR 1024.37(a).

57

amend their regulations to provide that the regulated lending institution or its servicer may

charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred for coverage beginning on the

date on which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient

coverage amount. The Agencies’ understanding is that the date on which the flood insurance

coverage lapses is the expiration date provided by the policy. The October 2013 Proposed Rule

solicited comment on whether the Agencies’ interpretation of the term “lapsed” is consistent

with the insurance industry’s use of the term and whether further clarification is necessary on

when a lender or servicer may begin to charge for force-placed flood insurance.

A number of commenters, including trade associations and lenders, generally supported

the proposed amendment allowing regulated lending institutions to charge borrowers for the cost

of premiums and fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date of lapse or insufficient

coverage. These commenters noted that this amendment would make it clear that force-placed

insurance resulting from expired or lapsed policies should be dated to the date of expiration to

ensure continuous flood coverage. Some trade association commenters supported the Agencies’

approach as consistent with Congressional intent and long-standing industry practice adopted to

ensure continuous coverage as required by the FDPA.

A number of commenters agreed with the Agencies’ interpretation that the date of lapse

is the expiration date provided in the borrower’s flood insurance policy and asserted this

definition is consistent with industry usage. Other commenters, however, disagreed with the

Agencies’ interpretation, with one trade association suggesting the regulations should clearly

state that a lapse is any period in which flood insurance coverage is not continuously maintained

that protects the interest of the named insured. Another commenter objected by noting that the

term is an insurance term of art and means more than the date coverage expires. This commenter

58

further stated that the term “lapse” can mean more than just the expiration date of coverage

depending on an insurer’s business practices. Lastly, an insurance association commenter

suggested defining a “lapse” to occur when a policy has been not renewed for some reason or has

been cancelled for non-payment, and therefore it would be more appropriate to use “non-

renewed or cancelled” rather than “expiration date” as provided in the October 2013 Proposed

Rule.

The Agencies understand that flood insurance policies under the NFIP will often provide

policyholders with a “grace period” of typically 30 days following the expiration date to pay the

renewal premiums and fees to restore the policy and ensure continuous coverage. However, the

Agencies also understand that any flood insurance coverage provided by the NFIP policy during

the grace period would cover only the lender’s interest. The borrower’s interest would be

covered during the grace period only if the borrower pays the renewal premium within the grace

period.63 Because there may be a lack of continuous flood coverage protecting the borrower’s

interest during this “grace period,” the Agencies consider the policy to have lapsed as of the

expiration date provided by the policy. The Agencies also consider policies that are cancelled

for any reason as having lapsed as of the date of cancellation because the borrower’s interests are

no longer covered by the policy. Therefore, the Agencies have amended their interpretation from

the original proposal to provide that the date on which the flood insurance coverage lapsed is the

expiration date provided by the policy or the date the flood insurance policy is cancelled.

The Agencies also received several comments requesting general clarification on the 45-

day notice requirement. Some commenters sought clarification on whether a regulated lending

institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, can send the 45-day notice of force placement to the

63 National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Manual at REN 2-3 (Apr. 1, 2015).

59

borrower prior to the actual expiration of the current policy so that the institution is prepared to

renew on the date it expires or whether the institution must wait until policy expiration to send

the notice. The Agencies note that, to ensure that adequate flood insurance coverage is

maintained throughout the term of the loan and to comply with the Federal flood statutes, a

regulated lending institution or its servicer must notify a borrower whenever flood insurance on

the collateral has expired or is less than the amount required for the property. The regulated

lending institution or its servicer must send this notice upon making a determination that the

flood insurance coverage is inadequate or has expired, such as upon receipt of the notice of

cancellation or expiration from the insurance provider or as a result of an internal flood policy

monitoring system. Notice is also required when a regulated lending institution learns that a

property requires flood insurance coverage because it is in an SFHA as a result of a flood map

change. The FDPA specifically provides that the lender or servicer for a loan must send a notice

upon its determination that the collateral property securing the loan is either not covered by flood

insurance or is covered by such insurance in an amount less than the amount required.64 In

accordance with this statutory requirement, the final rule clarifies that the required 45-day notice

must be sent following the date of lapse or insufficient coverage of the borrower’s policy.

The Agencies also received suggestions on alternative force placement notification

processes. A few commenters recommended the Agencies add a second 15-day reminder,65 as

required for force-placed hazard insurance under the CFPB’s rule, to simplify compliance for

loan servicers subject to RESPA’s Regulation X. Some commenters, including trade association

64 See 42 U.S.C. 4012a(e). 65 Under Regulation X, the CFPB requires a servicer to send two written notices before a servicer can assess a force placement charge on a borrower: (1) a notice at least 45 days before assessment of a charge, and (2) a notice at least 30 days after the initial notice and at least 15 days before assessment of a force placement charge. 12 CFR 1024.37(c)-(d).

60

commenters, recommended the Agencies issue guidance that would authorize a lender to follow

a notification process similar to FEMA’s Mortgage Portfolio Protection Program (MPPP).66 The

Agencies are aware of these alternative notification processes and appreciate the benefits of

additional notices. The Agencies note that a regulated lending institution or its servicer, at its

discretion, may send one or more additional notices prior to the expiration date as a courtesy to

assist the borrower. However, in order to comply with this section, the regulated lending

institution or its servicer still would be required to send the mandated 45-day notice following

the lapse of the borrower’s policy.

With respect to the notification regarding the renewal of a force-placed flood insurance

policy, some industry commenters requested additional guidance. One commenter stated that the

Agencies should do more to reduce the need for force-placed flood insurance, and suggested that

the Agencies coordinate with the CFPB to mitigate gaps in the regulations pertaining to flood

insurance policies. The Agencies may provide guidance in the future regarding notification in

connection with the renewal of a force-placed flood insurance policy.

Additionally, several commenters sought clarification on the date on which a regulated

lending institution or its servicer may force-place flood insurance. Some commenters inquired as

to whether the appropriate date is when the lender or servicer discovers the insufficient coverage

or after the expiration of the 45-day notice period. Other commenters also asserted a 45-day

waiting period creates liability for the institution and is contrary to the intent of the Federal flood

statutes to ensure continuous insurance coverage. The Agencies agree with the commenters who

suggested that the regulation provide that lenders or servicers may purchase force-placed

66 MPPP requires three notification letters to be sent to the borrower: (1) 45 days prior to expiration or upon determination, (2) 30 days following the first notification letter, and (3) after the end of 45 day notification period along with the flood insurance policy declarations page. 44 CFR 62.23.

61

insurance immediately after the borrower’s original policy lapses. Biggert-Waters clarifies that a

regulated lending institution or its servicer has the statutory authority to charge the borrower for

the cost of premiums and fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood

insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient coverage amount. Therefore, Biggert-

Waters permits a lender or servicer to force place insurance immediately after the borrower’s

policy has lapsed or did not provide sufficient coverage. The Agencies’ interpretation seeks to

ensure that the protections provided by flood coverage for both the borrower and lender will be

continuous. Based on the Federal flood statutes, the final rule clarifies that a regulated lending

institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, may force place flood insurance that would provide

coverage anytime during the 45-day notice period and would not have to wait 45 days after

providing notice to force place.

Some commenters, however, objected to the October 2013 Proposed Rule by asserting

that the proposed rule allowing for fees and charges of a force-placed policy beginning on the

date the borrower’s policy lapsed would be in conflict with Federal law that currently requires a

30-day waiting period on all NFIP policies, except for policies written in connection with new

loans, and other, limited circumstances.67 The Agencies understand that most force-placed

policies are private flood insurance policies rather than policies written under the MPPP

administered by FEMA. It is also the Agencies understanding that private force-placed flood

insurance policies generally do not have a 30-day waiting period and would allow a regulated

lending institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, to force place flood insurance effective

immediately.

67 Section 1306(c) of the NFIA, 42 U.S.C. 4013(c), as amended by the Act. See FEMA WYO Bulletin W-13017, issued March 29, 2013 and effective October 1, 2013.

62

In addition to requesting clarification on when a regulated lending institution or servicer

can force place flood insurance, numerous commenters also sought clarification on the date on

which a regulated lending institution or its servicer may charge for force-placed insurance. One

commenter asked whether a regulated lending institution can force place flood insurance at the

expiration of the current policy, but not charge the customer until the end of the 45-day notice

period. The Agencies note that Biggert-Waters and the final regulations provide that a regulated

lending institution or its servicer may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees

incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not

provide sufficient coverage. As discussed above, the Agencies interpret this provision to mean

that a regulated lending institution or its servicer can force place flood insurance beginning on

the day the borrower’s policy lapsed or did not provide sufficient coverage, and also, as of that

day, the institution can charge the borrower for the force-placed insurance.68 However, if the

borrower obtains a flood insurance policy that overlaps with the force-placed policy, the lender

or servicer must refund any premiums paid by the borrower for this overlap period. For

example, if a borrower has not renewed a flood insurance policy that expires on June 30, a lender

or servicer must provide the 45-day notice to the borrower and may force place a flood insurance

policy as early as July 1. The lender or servicer could bill the borrower upon force placing the

policy or could wait to bill the borrower at a later date, for example, when the 45-day notice

period expires. If the borrower did not obtain a flood insurance policy and the lender or servicer

had not force placed insurance by August 14 (the end of 45-day period), the lender or servicer

would be required by regulation to force place flood insurance on August 15. On the other hand,

if the lender force placed flood insurance as of July 1 and, if on July 15, the borrower renewed 68 Under Regulation X, the CFPB requires a servicer to wait 45 days before a servicer can assess a force placement charge on a borrower. 12 CFR 1024.37(c)-(d).

63

his or her flood insurance policy (effective from July 1) to satisfy the mandatory purchase

requirement and provided sufficient evidence to the lender or servicer, then the lender or servicer

would be required to refund any premiums paid by the borrower for the force-placed insurance

coverage between July 1 and July 15. As a practical matter, lenders or servicers may decide to

wait until after the 45-day notice period has expired to collect premiums for coverage dating

back to the date the force-placed policy was purchased to avoid the administrative burden of

having to refund the borrower’s premium for any period of overlapping coverage.

Finally, the Agencies received several comments regarding retroactive billing. One

commenter suggested a regulated lending institution or its servicer should not be permitted to

charge the borrower for lapsed coverage if the institution or servicer fails to identify a lapse

within 60 days. Another commenter asserted it is unreasonable to allow an institution to delay

sending notices in order to charge retroactively a borrower for a lengthy period of force-placed

flood insurance coverage. Additionally, several commenters requested the Agencies to define

clearly the date back to which a lender may charge force-placed flood insurance premiums and

suggested this date to be when a lender discovers that flood insurance coverage “did not provide

a sufficient coverage amount.” The plain language of the statute provides that the lender or

servicer may charge for premiums and fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which

flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient coverage amount. Further, when

the lending institution determines there is a coverage lapse or insufficient coverage, the FDPA

requires the institution to send a notice to the borrower. The Agencies also observe that, for

purposes of safety and soundness, regulated lending institutions should ensure continuous

coverage of flood insurance for the building or mobile home and any personal property securing

a designated loan.

64

Additionally, the Agencies interpret Biggert-Waters to permit a regulated lending

institution to force place a flood insurance policy purchased on behalf of a borrower that is

effective the day after expiration of a borrower’s original insurance policy to ensure continuous

coverage. Such a practice will ensure that institutions complete the force placement of flood

insurance in a timely manner upon lapse of the policy and that there is continuous insurance

coverage to protect both the borrower and the institution. If an institution, despite its monitoring

efforts, discovers a policy with insufficient coverage, for example due to a re-mapping, the

institution may charge back to the date of insufficient coverage provided the institution has

purchased a policy that covers the property for flood loss and that policy was effective as of the

date of insufficient coverage. However, if purchasing a new policy is necessary to force place

insurance upon discovery of insufficient coverage, an institution may not charge back to the date

of lapse or insufficient coverage because the policy did not provide coverage for the borrower

prior to purchase.

Termination of force-placed insurance.

As provided in section 102(e)(3) of the FDPA, which was added by section 100244 of

Biggert-Waters, the Agencies proposed that within 30 days of receipt by a regulated lending

institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of a borrower’s existing flood

insurance coverage, a regulated lending institution is required to: (i) notify the insurer to

terminate any force-placed insurance purchased by the regulated lending institution or its

servicer and (ii) refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance

purchased by the regulated lending institution or its servicer under this section for any period

during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage purchased by

65

the regulated lending institution or its servicer were each in effect (overlap period), and any

related fees charged to the borrower.

The Agencies realize that, although regulated lending institutions and servicers can

request that a force-placed insurance policy be terminated, it is the insurer that actually cancels

the policy. The October 2013 Proposed Rule, therefore, clarified that the statutory language in

section 102(e)(3) of the FDPA, as amended by section 100244 of Biggert-Waters, requires the

institution only to notify the insurer to terminate the force-placed policy. The institution also

must fully refund to the borrower the premiums and fees for the overlap period within the 30-day

period required by the statute.

Although some commenters generally supported the proposed termination and refund

requirements, a few commenters objected. One commenter suggested that the Agencies

withdraw this requirement for existing loans and allow a substantial period for compliance

prospectively. Another commenter asserted this requirement would mean a lender is “stuck

with” a portion of the premium for the force-placed insurance that was purchased only because

the borrower did not satisfy an obligation of the mortgage agreement to purchase flood

insurance. The Agencies understand lenders’ concerns regarding the termination and refund

provisions. However, Biggert-Waters specifically requires the refund of force-placed insurance

premiums for any overlap period and does not provide an exception to the requirement for

outstanding loans.

Other commenters sought further clarifications on the proposed requirements. One

commenter, for example, presented a scenario in which an existing policy expires on September

1 and then on September 16, the lender force places coverage retroactive to the date of lapse

(September 1) after having previously sent a force placement notice. On September 17, the

66

borrower provides proof of policy purchased that day but which is subject to a 30-day waiting

period prior to becoming effective. This commenter inquired whether the lender must terminate

a force-placed policy and refund premiums and fees at the expiration of the 30-day waiting

period or upon receipt by the lender of confirmation of borrower obtained flood insurance

coverage. The Agencies note that Biggert-Waters requires a lender or servicer to terminate any

force-placed insurance purchased by the regulated lending institution or its servicer and to refund

to the borrower all premiums or fees paid by the borrower for any overlap period. Because the

borrower’s policy is subject to a 30-day waiting period, it would not be “in effect” until the

waiting period has expired. The lender’s force-placed policy provides the only flood insurance

coverage on the property during that waiting period. Provided the force-placed insurance policy

is terminated upon the expiration of the waiting period, the lender would not need to refund

premiums and fees for the force-placed coverage because there would not be an overlap period.

Another commenter suggested the Agencies clarify that the lender’s refund obligation is

subject to the insurer’s refund of the premium. The Agencies note that Biggert-Waters does not

impose such a condition precedent upon the lender’s refund.

A commenter urged the Agencies to adopt a limit on how far back a regulated lending

institution may be required to refund overlapping flood insurance to encourage borrowers to be

diligent in reviewing notices and prompt in notifying the lender or servicer. The Agencies

understand the difficulties in refunding premiums for force-placed insurance for extensive

overlap periods due to the borrower not notifying the lender promptly. Nonetheless, the

Agencies note that Biggert-Waters makes clear that a lender is required to refund any premiums

and fees a borrower has paid for which the borrower provides sufficient documentation of

overlapping coverage. Accordingly, Biggert-Waters does not provide a limitation on the time

67

period for which a borrower can submit documentation of overlapping coverage. However, the

Agencies believe that a borrower receiving force placement notices and faced with the burden of

associated fees and premiums would be motivated to provide prompt notification to the lender of

the borrower’s own policy rather than be required to pay the additional fees and premiums

during any period of overlapping coverage. Based on a review of the comments, the Agencies

are adopting the termination and refund provision as proposed.

In addition, the Agencies note that section 102(e)(3) of the FDPA, as amended, and the

Agencies’ final regulations, do not specify a party from which a regulated lending institution

must receive confirmation of a borrower’s existing flood insurance coverage. Therefore,

regulated lending institutions may receive the confirmation from either the borrower or a third

party, such as an insurance agent or insurer with whom the institution has direct contact.

Sufficiency of Demonstration.

Pursuant to section 102(e)(4) of the FDPA, as amended by section 100244 of Biggert-

Waters, the October 2013 Proposed Rule provided that, for purposes of confirming a borrower’s

existing flood insurance coverage, a regulated lending institution or its servicer must accept from

the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance

policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company or its

agent. A few commenters expressed general support for the proposed regulations as important

protections that will simplify the verification process between lenders and flood insurance

providers and result in greater transparency. Numerous commenters requested further

clarifications while others expressed concerns with implementation of the proposed rules.

Among the clarifications requested, several trade associations asked what constitutes a

“sufficient demonstration” for purposes of confirming a borrower’s existing flood insurance

68

coverage. Another commenter suggested the Agencies clarify that sufficient evidence of

insurance coverage must include items specified in FEMA Bulletin W-13013.69 This commenter

also suggested inclusion of the policy term effective dates, the current flood coverage amount,

limitations and exclusions, the mortgagee’s identity, and, if the coverage is provided by a private

flood policy, some documentation that the policy satisfies either the Biggert-Waters definition of

private flood insurance or the mandatory purchase requirement. A large lender commenter

requested that the Agencies clarify that, in addition to the minimum required information, the

declarations page must contain the correct amount, dates, and other information to fulfill the

mandatory purchase requirements. This commenter also recommended that a copy of the policy

be provided to the lender or servicer and that the lender or servicer have 45 days to check for

compliance with any required private flood insurance criteria as conditions for terminating the

force-placed insurance based on a borrower’s private policy.

As provided by the October 2013 Proposed Rule, sufficient documentation consists of an

insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and

the identity of and contact information for the insurance company or its agent. This information

is all that is required under Biggert-Waters for an insurance policy declarations page to be

considered sufficient evidence of a borrower’s flood insurance coverage, and the Agencies

decline to require additional information.

69 FEMA Bulletin W-13013, issued March 19, 2013, reiterates that the NFIP rules and regulations do not allow the use of temporary declarations pages as evidence of insurance. The Bulletin refers to the General Rules section of the Flood Insurance Manual which provides rules regarding acceptable forms of evidence of insurance:

A copy of the Flood Insurance Application and premium payment, or a copy of the declarations page, is sufficient evidence of proof of purchase for new policies. The NFIP does not recognize binders. However, for informational purposes only, the NFIP recognizes certificates or evidences of flood insurance, and similar forms, provided for renewal policies if the following information is included: the policy form/type, term, and number; insured’s name and mailing address; property location; current and rated flood risk zone; grandfathering status; mortgagee name and address; coverage limits; deductibles; and annual premium.

69

Another area of concern identified by commenters is that the requirement to accept the

declarations page as sufficient demonstration may cause lenders to accept a private flood

insurance policy based on the declarations page, only to later determine that the policy is

unacceptable. As the Agencies discussed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule, a lender is

responsible for making all necessary inquiries into the adequacy of the borrower’s insurance

policy to ensure that the policy complies with the mandatory purchase requirement. If the lender

determines the coverage amount or any terms and conditions fail to meet applicable

requirements, the lender should notify the borrower and request that the borrower obtain an

adequate flood insurance policy.

Several commenters expressed concerns about the premature cancellation of a force-

placed policy resulting in its replacement by another force-placed policy when the regulated

lending institution determines that adequate insurance was not in place by the borrower. These

commenters suggested that the Agencies clarify that a regulated lending institution or servicer is

not required to cancel the force-placed policy until it has completed any necessary inquiries and

receives valid evidence of compliant flood insurance coverage.

The Agencies understand the commenters’ concerns with regard to premature

cancellation of a force-placed policy and the administrative burden of terminating such a policy

and refunding any paid premiums to the borrower. Consistent with Biggert-Waters, the final rule

provides regulated lending institutions and servicers with 30 days from the receipt of the

borrower’s confirmation of existing flood insurance to conduct all necessary inquiries regarding

whether the borrower’s flood insurance policy satisfies the minimum mandatory purchase

requirement.70 The Agencies note that any further inquiry regarding the borrower’s policy along

70 See 42 U.S.C. 4012(a)(e)(3).

70

with the termination and refund of premiums for the overlap period must be completed within

the 30-day period following receipt of confirmation of a borrower’s existing flood insurance

coverage.

Finally, several commenters asserted that regulated lending institutions and servicers

should have the discretion to accept other documents that may also demonstrate a borrower has

adequate flood insurance coverage. The Agencies clarify that although a declarations page is the

one option that a lender must accept, there are circumstances in which a lender can, subject to

safe and sound banking practices, accept alternative evidence of insurance documents acceptable

to the lender in order to cancel force-placed insurance. The Agencies note that the final rule

establishes the only information that a lender or servicer may require as sufficient demonstration

of flood insurance coverage; however, if other information is submitted, then the institution may

accept it. The Agencies, therefore, adopt the provision as proposed in the October 2013

Proposed Rule.

Other Comments

In addition to the solicited comments, the Agencies received comments addressing force-

placed insurance in general that are not specific to the October 2013 Proposed Rule. A few

consumer associations urged the Agencies to adopt additional provisions to reduce the incidence

of force-placed insurance and prevent kickbacks and other practices that unreasonably inflate the

cost of force-placed insurance and encourage excessive use. These commenters encouraged the

Agencies to require that force-placed insurance be reasonably priced, prohibit the purchase from

an insurer affiliated with the servicer, and place limits on how much voluntary flood coverage

the lender or servicer may require or force place. The Agencies observe that Biggert-Waters

does not address these issues. However, the Agencies remind regulated institutions that their

71

force placement practices should be consistent with all applicable laws, regulations, and safe and

sound banking practices.

These consumer associations also requested that the Agencies require regulated lending

institutions or servicers to advance insurance premiums rather than letting a borrower’s policy

lapse for nonpayment. These commenters urged that institutions and servicers must exhaust all

options to keep homeowners’ existing flood insurance policies in place before force placing

insurance. The Agencies note, however, that the Federal flood statutes do not contain provisions

similar to those relied upon by the CFPB in its mortgage servicing rule, which require a servicer

to advance funds to a borrower’s escrow account for the purpose of paying for a borrower’s

hazard insurance (unless the servicer has a reasonable basis to believe that a borrower’s hazard

insurance has been canceled or not renewed for reasons other than nonpayment).71 Although the

final rule does not require a regulated lending institution to advance premiums, the Agencies

note that nothing prohibits an institution from doing so to benefit the consumer.

A commenter requested that the Agencies clarify the applicability of the force placement

provisions to re-mapping scenarios. The Agencies reiterate that if at any time during the life of

the loan, a regulated lending institution or its servicer determines flood insurance is absent or

insufficient, including following a map change, the regulated lending institution or its servicer

must initiate force placement procedures by notifying the borrower of the mandatory purchase

71 The CFPB’s rule requires a servicer to advance funds to a borrower’s escrow account and to disburse such funds in a timely manner to pay the premium charge on a borrower’s hazard insurance (unless the servicer has a reasonable basis to believe that a borrower’s hazard insurance has been canceled or not renewed for reasons other than nonpayment of premium charges). Thus, even if a borrower were delinquent by more than 31 days, a servicer would be required under the CFPB’s rule to advance funds to continue the borrower’s hazard insurance policy. In promulgating this rule, the CFPB relied on its authority under section 19(a) of RESPA to prescribe such rules and to make such interpretations as may be necessary to achieve the consumer protection purposes of RESPA. See 78 FR 10696, 10714 (Feb. 14, 2013) and 12 CFR 1024.17(k)(5). The Agencies note that the Federal flood statutes do not contain a provision similar to the provision relied upon by the CFPB to require a servicer to advance funds to a borrower’s escrow account.

72

requirement and providing the borrower an opportunity to obtain the necessary amount of

coverage. If the borrower fails to purchase the required amount of insurance within 45 days after

the lender provides notice, the institution or servicer must force place flood insurance on the

borrower’s behalf.

Finally, the Agencies received comments from a number of different organizations

discussing the escrowing of force-placed insurance premiums and fees. The Agencies addressed

these comments above in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION related to

___.___ Escrow requirement.

___.___ Determination fees.

As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION related to

___.___ Authority, purpose, and scope, the Agencies are adopting the change in title of the head

of FEMA from “Director” to “Administrator” as proposed.

___.___ Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

Section 100239 of Biggert-Waters added a new section 102(b)(6) to the FDPA (42 U.S.C.

4012a(b)(6)), which requires regulated lending institutions to disclose to a borrower that: (i)

flood insurance is available from private insurance companies that issue SFIPs on behalf of the

NFIP or directly from the NFIP; (ii) flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as

an SFIP under the NFIP may be available from a private insurance company that issues policies

on behalf of the company; and (iii) the borrower is encouraged to compare the flood insurance

coverage, deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance

policies issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance

companies and to direct inquiries regarding the availability, cost, and comparisons of flood

insurance coverage to an insurance agent.

73

Furthermore, section 100239(b) of Biggert-Waters amended section 1364(a)(3)(C) of the

1968 Act (42 U.S.C. 4104a(a)(3)(C)) to require that the disclosures in section 102(b)(6) of the

FDPA be provided in the Notice of Special Flood Hazards. Therefore, the final rule provides

that the disclosures set forth in section 102(b)(6) of the FDPA be included in the Notice of

Special Flood Hazards. The Agencies also proposed model language for the disclosure in the

sample form of notice contained in Appendix A, as discussed further below.

In order to reduce the compliance burden of amending the Notice of Special Flood

Hazards, the Agencies are implementing these changes to the regulation effective January 1,

2016. This effective date coincides with the January 1, 2016 effective date set forth in HFIAA

that is applicable to the escrow provisions, which also affect Appendix A.

___.___ Notice of servicer’s identity.

As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION related to

___.___ Authority, purpose, and scope, the Agencies are adopting the change in title of the head

of FEMA from “Director” to “Administrator” as proposed.

Appendices A & B

Appendix A

As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION accompanying the

revisions to ___.__ Escrow requirement above, the Agencies proposed in the October 2014

Proposed Rule that regulated lending institutions must mail or deliver a written notice informing

borrowers about the requirement to escrow premiums and fees for required flood insurance. To

facilitate compliance with the proposed notice requirement, the Agencies proposed model

language that could be included, if applicable, in the Notice of Special Flood Hazards as set forth

in the sample form of notice contained in Appendix A.

74

Commenters were supportive of the Agencies proposing model language and that the

notice be included in or with the Notice of Special Flood Hazards. However, the Agencies

received comments with recommendations for improving the model language, which the

Agencies are including in this final rule. In particular, these suggestions are meant to clarify that

borrowers “may” be required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees to take into account

instances when the notice might be provided to a borrower of a loan excepted from the escrow

requirement.

One municipal government commenter suggested that the Agencies also include an

explanation of the term “escrow.” The Agencies are concerned that such an explanation could

complicate the notice, because the concept of escrow is not unique to flood insurance.

Additionally, escrow is already explained in the RESPA Special Information Booklet that is

provided to consumers applying for Federally related mortgages.72 As a result, the Agencies

decline to require additional language to explain the term “escrow” in the Notice of Special

Flood Hazards.

Furthermore, in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION accompanying the

revisions to ___.__ Exemptions above, the Agencies discussed a comment suggesting that the

language required by section 13(b) of HFIAA to be contained in the RESPA Special Information

Booklet also be included in the Notice of Special Flood Hazards. The commenter noted that

some borrowers might not receive the RESPA Special Information Booklet. The Agencies

believe that this is a concise disclosure that would be helpful to provide in the Notice of Special

Flood Hazards without detracting from all the other disclosures required in the notice.

Therefore, the Agencies are amending the Notice of Special Flood Hazards to include the

72 12 USC 2604(b)(9).

75

language that is required to be included in the RESPA Special Information Booklet by section

13(b) of HFIAA.

Moreover, as noted above, the October 2013 Proposed Rule amended the sample form of

notice contained in Appendix A to include the disclosures required by section 102(b)(6) of the

FDPA, as added by section 100239 of Biggert-Waters, regarding the availability of private flood

insurance coverage. The proposed additions to the sample form closely tracked the statutory

language. The Agencies also proposed in the October 2013 Proposed Rule to revise the language

relating to the coverage limit to more accurately reflect what is actually covered under the

Federal flood statutes. Specifically, the October 2013 Proposed Rule amended the language to

state that flood insurance coverage is available only on the building or mobile home and any

personal property that secures the loan and not the land itself. In addition, the October 2013

Proposed Rule provided other technical amendments to the sample form of notice contained in

Appendix A to change the references to the head of FEMA from “Director” to “Administrator.”

The Agencies are adopting these changes set forth in the October 2013 Proposed Rule with one

minor word change from “ask” to “contact” in the sample form language on the availability of

private flood insurance coverage.

Finally, the changes to Appendix A are effective on January 1, 2016. Consistent with

HFIAA, the provision requiring the escrow notice to be included on or with the Notice of Special

Flood Hazards does not take effect until January 1, 2016. Therefore, the Agencies are making all

the changes related to Appendix A effective at once, on January 1, 2016, in order to reduce the

compliance burden on regulated lending institutions associated with amending the Notice of

Special Flood Hazards.

76

Appendix B

As discussed above in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION accompanying the

revisions to ___.__ Escrow requirement, the final rule requires lenders to provide a notice of the

option to escrow to borrowers of loans outstanding as of January 1, 2016, or July 1 of the

succeeding calendar year after a lender no longer qualifies for the small lender exception, as

applicable. In the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the Agencies proposed an additional sample

clause, Sample Clause for Option to Escrow for Outstanding Loans, as Appendix B to facilitate

compliance with this proposed requirement.

In the October 2014 Proposed Rule, the Agencies proposed that the notice would not

need to be provided in conjunction with any other disclosure or need to be segregated from other

information provided to the borrower. A consumer group commenter suggested that the notice

be conspicuous and segregated from any other correspondence. Although the Agencies believe

that the notice should be readily apparent to the borrower to increase the likelihood of a borrower

reading it, the Agencies decline to impose any specific requirement that the notice be

conspicuous or segregated from other information. The Agencies believe that, as all of the

information contained in the notice may be important to the borrower, no one particular part of

the notice should be singled out. Under the final rule, regulated lending institutions may choose

whether to provide the notice as a separate notice or add it to another disclosure the lender

provides the borrower on or before the proposed deadline, such as a periodic statement.

A financial institution commenter inquired whether a lender may add additional language

to the sample clause set forth in Appendix B. The Agencies note that the sample clause provides

suggested language and that this would not preclude a regulated lending institution from

inserting additional language that it believes would help a borrower better understand his or her

77

options regarding the escrow of flood insurance premiums and fees. The commenter also

recommended minor language and format changes to the sample clause, which the Agencies are

adopting, among other changes to the language to improve readability.

Consistent with HFIAA, the escrow provisions requiring the option to escrow notice will

not be effective until January 1, 2016. Consequently, Appendix B will not be effective until that

date.

Appendix C

The Agencies are not adopting the notice proposed as Appendix C in the October 2013

Proposed Rule because the notice is no longer applicable, based on the changes to the escrow

requirements enacted in HFIAA.

IV. Regulatory Analysis

Regulatory Flexibility Act

OCC: Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), an agency must prepare a

regulatory flexibility analysis for all proposed and final rules that describes the impact of the rule

on small entities.73 Under section 605(b) of the RFA, this analysis is not required if the head of

the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities and publishes its certification and a short explanatory statement in the

Federal Register along with its rule. The OCC has concluded that the final rule does not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities supervised by the OCC.

The OCC currently supervises approximately 1,106 small entities — 339 Federal savings

associations, 748 national banks, and 19 trust companies (collectively, small banks).74 To

73 See 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. 74 We base our estimate of the number of small entities on the Small Business Association’s (SBA) size thresholds for commercial banks and savings institutions, and trust companies, which are $550 million and $38.5 million,

78

determine the number of banks that may be affected by the rule, we determined the number of

banks that self-identified by reporting mortgage servicing assets or other activity associated with

one-to-four family residential mortgage loans in the Q4 2014 Call Report or were identified by

OCC examiners as a Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) filer or bank that originates

mortgage loans. We identified 1,162 such banks of which there are approximately 796 small

banks that the rule could impact.75 Thus, we assume the rule impacts a substantial number of

small banks.

The OCC classifies the economic impact of total costs on a bank as significant if the total

costs in a single year are greater than 5 percent of total salaries and benefits or greater than 2.5

percent of total non-interest expense. The OCC estimates that the average cost per small bank is

approximately $6 thousand in 2015. Using this cost estimate, we believe the final rule will not

have a significant economic impact on any small banks. .

Therefore, pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA, the OCC hereby certifies that this final

rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.

respectively. Consistent with the General Principles of Affiliation 13 CFR 121.103(a), we count the assets of affiliated financial institutions when determining if we should classify a bank as a small entity. We use December 31, 2014, to determine size because a “financial institution’s assets are determined by averaging the assets reported on its four quarterly financial statements for the preceding year.” See footnote 8 of the SBA’s Table of Size Standards. 75 For purposes of determining if the rule could impact a substantial number of small entities, we assume that all small banks have a policy in place to require the escrow of taxes and insurance.

79

Board: The RFA requires an agency to perform an assessment of the impact a rule is

expected to have on small entities. Based on its analysis, and for the reasons stated below, the

Board believes that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities.

1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the final rule. The Board is adopting

revisions to Regulation H to implement certain provisions of Biggert-Waters and HFIAA over

which the Agencies, including the Board, have jurisdiction. Consistent with HFIAA, the final

rule exempts any structure that is a part of residential property but is detached from the primary

residential structure of such property and does not serve as a residence from the mandatory flood

insurance purchase requirement.

The final rule also implements the provisions in the FDPA, as amended by the Biggert-

Waters Act and HFIAA, requiring a regulated lending institution (or its servicer) to escrow the

premiums and fees for required flood insurance for any loan secured by residential improved real

estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1,

2016, unless the lender or the loan qualifies for exceptions set forth in the statute, including an

exception for certain small lenders with assets less than $1 billion.

Furthermore, the final rule implements the requirement in HFIAA that regulated lending

institutions offer and make available to a borrower the option to escrow flood insurance

premiums and fees for loans that are outstanding as of January 1, 2016. The final rule also

extends the requirement to offer and make available an option to escrow to a borrower when a

regulated lending institution no longer qualifies for the exception for small lenders.

Finally, the final rule adopts revisions to the force placement provisions consistent with

Biggert-Waters to clarify that a regulated lending institution or its servicer may charge a

80

borrower for the cost of flood insurance coverage commencing on the date on which the

borrower’s coverage lapsed or became insufficient. The final rule also provides that within 30

days of receipt of a confirmation of a borrower’s existing flood insurance coverage, a regulated

lending institution is required to terminate any force-placed insurance purchased by the regulated

lending institution, and refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for lender-

place coverage for any period during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the

lender-placed coverage overlapped.

2. Summary of issues raised by comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility

analysis. The Board did not receive any comments on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.

3. Small entities affected by the final rule. All State member banks that are subject to

Regulation H would be subject to the proposed rule. As of March 31, 2015, there were 850 State

member banks. Under regulations issued by the Small Business Administration (SBA), banks

and other depository institutions with total assets of $550 million or less are considered small

entities. Of the 850 State member banks subject to Regulation H, approximately 632 State

member banks would be considered small entities by the SBA.

4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final rule would provide

an exemption from a requirement for certain detached structures, but would also impose new

compliance requirements with the final escrow provisions. With respect to the final rule

exempting certain detached structures from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement,

the Board believes the rules will not have a significant impact on small entities. First, not all

designated loans are secured by detached structures that are eligible for the exemption. The final

rule will have no impact with respect to such loans. Second, for designated loans that are

secured by detached structures eligible for the exemption, lenders, including small lenders, may

81

choose to continue requiring flood insurance on such structures as they currently do even though

the FDPA does not mandate it, as discussed above in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. As a result, the final rule would not have any impact in such instances. If a

lender does choose to exempt detached structures that secure a designated loan from the

mandatory flood insurance purchase requirement, the Board expects that the impact would be

minimal because these types of structures typically constitute a smaller portion of the collateral

securing designated loans.

Furthermore, as discussed in detail above in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION, regulated lending institutions with total assets less than $1 billion would

generally be excepted from the proposed rules implementing the escrow provisions of HFIAA.

Therefore, the final escrow provisions generally would not affect small entities.

The Biggert-Waters force placement provisions went into effect upon enactment of

Biggert-Waters on July 6, 2012. As a result, the final rules implementing the Biggert-Waters

force placement provisions should not have any impact on small entities who already were

required to comply with the provisions as of July 6, 2012. Even prior to Biggert-Waters’

passage, regulated lending institutions, including those that are considered small entities, should

have had mechanisms in place to refund premiums and fees to borrowers for any period of

overlap between a force-placed policy and a borrower’s policy. Consequently, the force

placement provisions, which set forth procedures for terminating force-placed insurance and

refunding premiums and fees to the borrower, nevertheless, should have minimal impact on

regulated lending institutions.

82

5. Significant alternatives to the final revisions. The Board has not identified any

significant alternatives that would reduce the regulatory burden associated with this final rule on

small entities.

FDIC: The FDIC is finalizing revisions to FDIC part 339 to account for certain changes

to the FDPA, as amended by Biggert-Waters and HFIAA, that require lenders to escrow flood

insurance premiums and fees to promote continuous flood insurance coverage for property

securing designated loans, and to also terminate force-placed insurance and refund premiums and

fees paid by a borrower for any period of overlapping insurance coverage.

The RFA requires an agency to prepare an analysis that describes the potential impact of

a proposed rule on small entities and include it in a notice of proposed rulemaking, making it

available for public comment. A regulatory flexibility analysis is not required, however, if the

agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number

of small entities (defined in regulations promulgated by the SBA to include banking

organizations with total assets of less than or equal to $550 million) and publishes its

certification and a short, explanatory statement in the Federal Register together with the rule.

As of June 4, 2015, there were approximately 3,390 small FDIC-supervised banks, which

include 3,103 State nonmember banks and 240 State-chartered savings banks, and 47 savings

associations. The FDPA, as amended by Biggert-Waters, provides that generally a depository

institution with assets of less than $1 billion is not required to comply with the escrow

requirement. As a result, due to this statutory exclusion, the escrow requirement cannot have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Additionally, Biggert-Waters includes reimbursement provisions related to force

placement of flood insurance. The provisions set out the circumstances under which a regulated

83

lending institution must terminate force-placed insurance and refund to the borrower all

premiums and fees paid by the borrower for lender-placed coverage for any period during which

the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the lender-placed coverage overlapped. Biggert-

Waters’ force placement provisions already went into effect upon passage of the Act on July 6,

2012. As a result, the final rule incorporating the Biggert-Waters force placement provisions

should not have any impact on small entities that were required to comply with the provisions as

of July 6, 2012. For these reasons, the FDIC certifies that this final rule will not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities that it supervises.

FCA: Pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA, the FCA hereby certifies that the final rule

will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Each of

the banks in the Farm Credit System, considered together with its affiliated associations, has

assets and annual income in excess of the amounts that would qualify them as small entities.

Therefore, Farm Credit System institutions are not “small entities” as defined in the RFA.

NCUA: The RFA requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to describe any significant

economic impact a regulation may have on a substantial number of small entities.76 For

purposes of this analysis, NCUA considers small credit unions to be those having under $50

million in assets.77 As of December 31, 2014, there are 4,129 small, federally insured credit

unions, and only about 1,850 of these credit unions have real estate loans. This final rule

implements certain changes to the FDPA, as amended by Biggert-Waters and HFIAA.

The final rule requires a credit union or servicer to escrow the premiums and fees for

required flood insurance for any loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile

76 5 U.S.C. 603(a). 77 Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 03–2, 68 FR 31949 (May 29, 2003), as amended by Interpretative Ruling and Policy Statement 13-1, 78 FR 4032 (Jan. 18, 2013).

84

home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016. The final rule

also implements additional exceptions from the escrow requirements, as amended by HFIAA.

One of these exceptions allows for credit unions with total assets less than $1 billion to be

generally excluded from the escrow requirements. Due to this statutory exception, the escrow

provisions of the final rule will not significantly affect a substantial number of small credit

unions.

In addition, the final rule adopts revisions to the force placement provisions to clarify that

a credit union or its servicer may charge a borrower for the cost of flood insurance coverage

from the date the borrower’s coverage lapsed or became insufficient. The final rule also

provides for the termination of force-placed insurance and the refund of premiums and fees paid

by a borrower for any period of overlapping insurance coverage. The force placement provisions

in the final rule were effective on July 6, 2012, and credit unions have been enforcing force

placement provisions since that time. In addition, credit unions currently have the tools to refund

premiums and fees whenever a borrower’s policy overlaps a force-placed policy, as required in

the final rule. Therefore, the final rule’s force placement provisions will not have any significant

impact on small credit unions that were required to comply with the provisions as of July 6,

2012.

For these reasons, NCUA finds that this final rule affects relatively few federally insured,

small credit unions and the associated cost is minimal. Accordingly, NCUA certifies that this

rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et

seq.) requires certain agencies, including the OCC, to prepare a budgetary impact statement

85

before promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by

State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or

more in any one year. If a budgetary impact statement is required, section 205 of UMRA also

requires an agency to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives before

promulgating the rule.

Overall, we estimate the total costs associated with this final rule will range from

approximately $25.1 million to approximately $30.8 million in 2015 and from approximately

$13 million to approximately $16 million in 2016. However, pursuant to section 201 of the

UMRA, a regulation does not impose a mandate to the extent it incorporates requirements

“specifically set forth in the law.” Therefore, we exclude from our UMRA estimate costs

specifically related to requirements set forth in Biggert-Waters and HFIAA, such as direct costs

associated with establishing escrow accounts. Furthermore, under Title II of the UMRA, indirect

costs, foregone revenues and opportunity costs are not included when determining if a mandate

meets or exceeds UMRA’s cost threshold. Therefore, based on these exclusions, our UMRA

cost estimate for the final rule ranges from approximately $24.4 million to approximately $26.3

million.

Accordingly, because the OCC has determined that this final rule would not result in

expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million or

more, we have not prepared a budgetary impact statement or specifically addressed the

regulatory alternatives considered.

86

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

The OCC, Board, FDIC, and NCUA (the PRA Agencies)78 have determined that this

final rule involves a collection of information pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

In accordance with the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board

reviewed the final rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB). The collection of information that is subject to the PRA by this rule is

found in 12 CFR 22.5, 208.25(e), 339.5, and 760.5. In addition, as permitted by the PRA, the

Board also extends for three years its respective information collection.

The PRA Agencies may not conduct or sponsor, and an organization is not required to

respond to, this information collection unless the information collection displays a currently

valid OMB control number. The Board’s OMB control number is 7100-0280. The FDIC, the

OCC, and the NCUA will seek new OMB control numbers.

The OCC, FDIC, and NCUA submitted the information collection requirements to OMB

in connection with the proposal. OMB filed a comment pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.11(c)

instructing the agencies to examine public comment in response to the proposal and describe in

the supporting statement of its next collection (the final rule) any public comments received

regarding the collection as well as why (or why it did not) incorporate the commenter’s

recommendation and include the draft final rule in its next submission. There were no comments

78 The FCA has determined that the final rule does not involve a collection of information pursuant to the PRA for System institutions because System institutions are Federally chartered instrumentalities of the United States and instrumentalities of the United States are specifically excepted from the definition of “collection of information” contained in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3).

87

received regarding the collection. The agencies have resubmitted the collection to OMB in

connection with the final rule.

Biggert-Waters required escrow for all new and outstanding loans in an SFHA, unless

certain exceptions applied. HFIAA added several new exceptions, and most notably, ties the

escrow requirement to a triggering event (the origination, refinance, increase, extension, or

renewal of a loan on or after January 1, 2016). While a regulated lending institution is not

required to escrow until a triggering event occurs, such institution is still required to offer and

make available the option to escrow for all outstanding designated loans. This requirement is

identical to the prior PRA burden in the October 2013 Proposed Rule, which required an escrow

notice for all outstanding designated loans. However, there may be fewer notices because of the

additional exceptions under HFIAA. The PRA Agencies believe the paperwork burden estimates

remain unchanged from the prior PRA burden estimated in the October 2013 Proposed Rule.79

This information collection is required to evidence compliance with the requirements of

the Federal flood insurance statutes with respect to lenders and servicers. Because the PRA

Agencies do not collect any information, no issue of confidentiality arises. The respondents are

for-profit and non-profit financial institutions, including small businesses.

Entities subject to the PRA Agencies’ existing flood insurance rules will have to review

and revise disclosures that are currently provided to ensure that such disclosures accurately

reflect the disclosure requirements in this final rule. Entities subject to the rule may also need to

develop new disclosures to meet the rule’s timing requirements.

79 OCC’s and NCUA’s burden estimates have been slightly adjusted from the October 2013 Proposed Rule.

88

The total estimated burden represents averages for all respondents regulated by the PRA

Agencies. The PRA Agencies expect that the amount of time required to implement each of the

changes for a given institution may vary based on the size and complexity of the respondent.

The PRA Agencies estimate that respondents would take, on average, 40 hours to update

their systems in order to comply with the disclosure requirements and the one-time escrow notice

under the rule. In an effort to minimize the compliance cost and burden, particularly for small

entities that do not meet the requirement for the statutory exception, the rule contains model

disclosures in Appendices A and B that may be used to satisfy the requirements.

Burden Estimates

OCC:

Number of Respondents: 1,550.

Burden for Existing Recordkeeping Requirements: 21,700 hours.

Burden for Existing Disclosure Requirements: 23,250 hours.

Burden Added by Final Rule: 62,000 hours.

Total Burden for Collection for Final Rule: 106,950 hours.

Board:

Number of Respondents: 850.

Burden for Existing Recordkeeping Requirements: 14,308 hours.

Burden for Existing Disclosure Requirements: 17,780 hours.

Burden Added by Final Rule: 34,000 hours.

Total Burden for Collection for Final Rule: 66,088 hours.

FDIC:

Number of Respondents: 4,103.

89

Burden for Existing Recordkeeping Requirements: 57,442 hours.

Burden for Existing Disclosure Requirements: 71,474 hours.

Burden Added by Final Rule: 164,120 hours.

Total Burden for Collection for Final Rule: 293,036 hours.

NCUA:

Number of Respondents: 4,033.

Burden for Existing Recordkeeping Requirements: 47,892 hours.

Burden for Existing Disclosure Requirements: 59,824 hours.

Burden Added by Final Rule: 161,320 hours.

Total Burden for Collection for Final Rule: 269,036 hours.

These collections are available to the public at www.reginfo.gov.

Comments are invited on: (1) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the PRA Agencies’ functions; including whether the information

has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the PRA Agencies’ estimate of the burden of the

proposed information collection, including the cost of compliance; (3) ways to enhance the

quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the

burden of information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments on the collection of information should be sent to:

OCC: Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the OCC is subject to delay,

commenters are encouraged to submit comments by e-mail, if possible. Comments may be sent

to: Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,

Attention: 1557-ESCROW, 400 7th Street, SW., Suite 3E-218, Mail Stop 9W-11, Washington, DC

90

20219. In addition, comments may be sent by fax to (571) 465-4326 or by electronic mail

to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You may personally inspect and photocopy comments at the

OCC, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. For security reasons, the OCC requires that

visitors make an appointment to inspect comments. You may do so by calling (202) 649-6700.

Upon arrival, visitors will be required to present valid government-issued photo identification and

submit to security screening in order to inspect and photocopy comments.

All comments received, including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of

the public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any information in your

comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or inappropriate for public

disclosure.

Board: Mark Tokarski, Acting Federal Reserve Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief

Data Officer, Mail Stop K1-148, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,

Washington, DC 20551, with copies of such comments sent to the Office of Management and

Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (7100–0280), Washington, DC 20503.

FDIC: You may submit comments, which should refer to “Interagency Flood

Insurance, 3064-ESCROW” by any of the following methods:

• Agency Web Site: http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/. Follow the instructions for

submitting comments on the FDIC Web site.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for

submitting comments.

• Email: comments@FDIC.gov. Include “Interagency Flood Insurance, 3064-ESCROW” in

the subject line of the message.

91

• Mail: Gary A. Kuiper, Counsel, or John Popeo, Counsel, Attn: Comments, Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, N.W., MB-3007, Washington, DC 20429.

• Hand Delivery: Comments may be hand delivered to the guard station at the rear of the 550

17th Street Building (located on F Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.

Public Inspection: All comments received will be posted without change to

http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/ including any personal information provided.

NCUA: Jessica Khouri, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street,

Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax No. 703-837-2861, Email: OCIOPRA@ncua.gov.

Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the OMB desk officer

for the PRA Agencies by mail to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office

of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street,

N.W., Washington, DC 20503; by fax to (202) 395-6974; or by email

to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.

List of Subjects

12 CFR Part 22

Flood insurance, Mortgages, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,

Savings associations.

12 CFR Part 172

Flood insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations.

12 CFR Part 208

Accounting, Agriculture, Banks, banking, Confidential business information, Crime, Currency,

Federal Reserve System, Flood insurance, Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Securities.

92

12 CFR Part 339

Flood insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations.

12 CFR Part 614

Agriculture, Banks, banking, Flood insurance, Foreign trade, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Rural areas.

12 CFR Part 760

Credit unions, Mortgages, Flood insurance, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

12 CFR CHAPTER I

Authority and Issuance

For the reasons set forth in the joint preamble and under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 93a,

chapter I of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is revised to read as follows:

1. Effective October 1, 2015, part 22 is revised to read as follows: PART 22—LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS Sec. 22.1 Purpose and scope. 22.2 Definitions. 22.3 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available. 22.4 Exemptions. 22.5 Escrow requirement. 22.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form. 22.7 Force placement of flood insurance. 22.8 Determination fees. 22.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance. 22.10 Notice of servicer’s identity. APPENDIX A TO PART 22—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD

HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 1462a, 1463, 1464, and 5412(b)(2)(B); 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a,

4104b, 4106, and 4128.

93

§ 22.1 Purpose and scope.

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this part is to implement the requirements of the National

Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42

U.S.C. 4001–4129).

(b) Scope. This part, except for §§ 22.6 and 22.8, applies to loans secured by buildings or

mobile homes located or to be located in areas determined by the Administrator of the Federal

Emergency Management Agency to have special flood hazards. Sections 22.6 and 22.8 apply to

loans secured by buildings or mobile homes, regardless of location.

§ 22.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part:

(a) Act means the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001–

4129).

(b) Administrator of FEMA means the Administrator of the Federal Emergency

Management Agency.

(c) Building means a walled and roofed structure, other than a gas or liquid storage tank,

that is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, and a walled and roofed

structure while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair.

(d) Community means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has zoning and

building code jurisdiction over a particular area having special flood hazards.

(e) Designated loan means a loan secured by a building or mobile home that is located or

to be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act.

(f) Mobile home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, that is built on

a permanent chassis and designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached

94

to the required utilities. The term mobile home does not include a recreational vehicle. For

purposes of this part, the term mobile home means a mobile home on a permanent foundation.

The term mobile home includes a manufactured home as that term is used in the NFIP.

(g) National bank means a national bank or a Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank.

(h) NFIP means the National Flood Insurance Program authorized under the Act.

(i) Residential improved real estate means real estate upon which a home or other

residential building is located or to be located.

(j) Federal savings association means, for purposes of this part, a Federal savings

association as that term is defined in 12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(2) and any service corporations thereof.

(k) Servicer means the person responsible for:

(l) Receiving any scheduled, periodic payments from a borrower under the terms of a

loan, including amounts for taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges with respect to the

property securing the loan; and

(2) Making payments of principal and interest and any other payments from the amounts

received from the borrower as may be required under the terms of the loan.

(l) Special flood hazard area means the land in the flood plain within a community having

at least a one percent chance of flooding in any given year, as designated by the Administrator of

FEMA.

(m) Table funding means a settlement at which a loan is funded by a contemporaneous

advance of loan funds and an assignment of the loan to the person advancing the funds.

§ 22.3 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

(a) In general. A national bank or Federal savings association shall not make, increase,

extend, or renew any designated loan unless the building or mobile home and any personal

95

property securing the loan is covered by flood insurance for the term of the loan. The amount of

insurance must be at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the

designated loan or the maximum limit of coverage available for the particular type of property

under the Act. Flood insurance coverage under the Act is limited to the building or mobile home

and any personal property that secures a loan and not the land itself.

(b) Table funded loans. A national bank or Federal savings association that acquires a

loan from a mortgage broker or other entity through table funding shall be considered to be

making a loan for the purposes of this part.

§ 22.4 Exemptions.

The flood insurance requirement prescribed by §22.3 does not apply with respect to:

(a) Any State-owned property covered under a policy of self-insurance satisfactory to the

Administrator of FEMA, who publishes and periodically revises the list of States falling within

this exemption;

(b) Property securing any loan with an original principal balance of $5,000 or less and a

repayment term of one year or less; or

(c) Any structure that is a part of any residential property but is detached from the

primary residential structure of such property and does not serve as a residence. For purposes of

this paragraph (c):

(1) “A structure that is a part of a residential property” is a structure used primarily for

personal, family, or household purposes, and not used primarily for agricultural, commercial,

industrial, or other business purposes;

(2) A structure is “detached” from the primary residential structure if it is not joined by

any structural connection to that structure; and

96

(3) “Serve as a residence” shall be based upon the good faith determination of the

national bank or Federal savings association that the structure is intended for use or actually used

as a residence, which generally includes sleeping, bathroom, or kitchen facilities.

§ 22.5 Escrow requirement.

If a national bank or Federal savings association requires the escrow of taxes, insurance

premiums, fees, or any other charges for a loan secured by residential improved real estate or a

mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after October 1, 1996, the

national bank or Federal savings association shall also require the escrow of all premiums and

fees for any flood insurance required under § 22.3. The national bank or Federal savings

association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall deposit the flood insurance premiums on

behalf of the borrower in an escrow account. This escrow account will be subject to escrow

requirements adopted pursuant to section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of

1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA), which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in

escrow accounts for certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements for those

accounts, only if the loan is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the

Administrator of FEMA or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the national

bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall pay the amount owed

to the insurance provider from the escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

§ 22.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form.

(a) Use of form. A national bank or Federal savings association shall use the standard

flood hazard determination form developed by the Administrator of FEMA when determining

whether the building or mobile home offered as collateral security for a loan is or will be located

in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act. The standard

97

flood hazard determination form may be used in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner.

A national bank or Federal savings association may obtain the standard flood hazard

determination form from FEMA’s Web site at www.fema.gov.

(b) Retention of form. A national bank or Federal savings association shall retain a copy

of the completed standard flood hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic

form, for the period of time the bank or savings association owns the loan.

§ 22.7 Force placement of flood insurance.

(a) Notice and purchase of coverage. If a national bank or Federal savings association, or

a servicer acting on behalf of the bank or savings association, determines at any time during the

term of a designated loan, that the building or mobile home and any personal property securing

the designated loan is not covered by flood insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an

amount less than the amount required under § 22.3, then the national bank or Federal savings

association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall notify the borrower that the borrower should

obtain flood insurance, at the borrower’s expense, in an amount at least equal to the amount

required under § 22.3, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood

insurance within 45 days after notification, then the national bank or Federal savings association,

or its servicer, shall purchase insurance on the borrower’s behalf. The national bank or Federal

savings association, or its servicer, may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees

incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred for coverage

beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient

coverage amount.

(b) Termination of force-placed insurance. (1) Termination and refund. Within 30 days

of receipt by a national bank or Federal savings association, or by a servicer acting on its behalf,

98

of a confirmation of a borrower’s existing flood insurance coverage, the national bank or Federal

savings association, or its servicer, shall:

(i) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the national

bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section; and

(ii) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance

purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or by its servicer, under paragraph

(a) of this section during any period during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and

the insurance coverage purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or its

servicer, were each in effect, and any related fees charged to the borrower with respect to the

insurance purchased by the national bank or Federal savings association, or its servicer, during

such period.

(2) Sufficiency of demonstration. For purposes of confirming a borrower’s existing flood

insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, a national bank or Federal savings

association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall accept from the borrower an insurance policy

declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of,

and contact information for, the insurance company or agent.

§ 22.8 Determination fees.

(a) General. Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other than the Flood Disaster

Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001 - 4129), any national bank or Federal

savings association, or a servicer acting on behalf of the national bank or Federal savings

association, may charge a reasonable fee for determining whether the building or mobile home

securing the loan is located or will be located in a special flood hazard area. A determination fee

may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-loan monitoring.

99

(b) Borrower fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may

be charged to the borrower if the determination:

(1) Is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan

that is initiated by the borrower;

(2) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s revision or updating of flood plain areas or

flood-risk zones;

(3) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s publication of a notice or compendium that:

(i) Affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or

(ii) By determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a

determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood

hazard area; or

(4) Results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the lender, or its servicer, on

behalf of the borrower under § 22.7.

(c) Purchaser or transferee fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this

section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or transfer

of the loan.

§ 22.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

(a) Notice requirement. When a national bank or Federal savings association makes,

increases, extends, or renews a loan secured by a building or a mobile home located or to be

located in a special flood hazard area, the bank or savings association shall mail or deliver a

written notice to the borrower and to the servicer in all cases whether or not flood insurance is

available under the Act for the collateral securing the loan.

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

100

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available under the

NFIP and may also be available from private insurers; and

(4) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

(c) Timing of notice. The national bank or Federal savings association shall provide the

notice required by paragraph (a) of this section to the borrower within a reasonable time before

the completion of the transaction, and to the servicer as promptly as practicable after the bank or

savings association provides notice to the borrower and in any event no later than the time the

bank or savings association provides other similar notices to the servicer concerning hazard

insurance and taxes. Notice to the servicer may be made electronically or may take the form of a

copy of the notice to the borrower.

(d) Record of receipt. The national bank or Federal savings association shall retain a

record of the receipt of the notices by the borrower and the servicer for the period of time it owns

the loan.

(e) Alternate method of notice. Instead of providing the notice to the borrower required

by paragraph (a) of this section, a national bank or Federal savings association may obtain

satisfactory written assurance from a seller or lessor that, within a reasonable time before the

completion of the sale or lease transaction, the seller or lessor has provided such notice to the

101

purchaser or lessee. The national bank or Federal savings association shall retain a record of the

written assurance from the seller or lessor for the period of time it owns the loan.

(f) Use of sample form of notice. A national bank or Federal savings association will be

considered to be in compliance with the requirement for notice to the borrower of this section by

providing written notice to the borrower containing the language presented in appendix A to this

part within a reasonable time before the completion of the transaction. The notice presented in

appendix A to this part satisfies the borrower notice requirements of the Act.

§ 22.10 Notice of servicer’s identity.

(a) Notice requirement. When a national bank or Federal savings association makes,

increases, extends, renews, sells, or transfers a loan secured by a building or mobile home

located or to be located in a special flood hazard area, it shall notify the Administrator of FEMA

(or the Administrator’s designee) in writing of the identity of the servicer of the loan. The

Administrator of FEMA has designated the insurance provider to receive the national bank’s or

Federal savings association’s notice of the servicer’s identity. This notice may be provided

electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to the Administrator of FEMA’s designee.

(b) Transfer of servicing rights. The national bank or Federal savings association shall

notify the Administrator of FEMA (or the Administrator’s designee) of any change in the

servicer of a loan described in paragraph (a) of this section within 60 days after the effective date

of the change. This notice may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is

satisfactory to the Administrator of FEMA’s designee. Upon any change in the servicing of a

loan described in paragraph (a) of this section, the duty to provide notice under this paragraph (b)

shall transfer to the transferee servicer.

102

APPENDIX A TO PART 22—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that: The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be located in an area with special flood hazards. The area has been identified by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: ________. This area has at least a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%). Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Director of FEMA to review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information. ___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense. • Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance also may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. • At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of: (1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP. Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the overall value of the property securing the loan minus the value of the land on which the property is located. • Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community's participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

103

___ Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally-declared flood disaster. 2. Effective January 1, 2016, part 22 is amended by:

a. Revising § 22.5 to read as follows:

§ 22.5 Escrow requirement.

(a) In general. (1) Applicability. Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) or (c) of this

section, a national bank or a Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall

require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under § 22.3(a) for

any designated loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made,

increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016, payable with the same frequency as

payments on the designated loan are required to be made for the duration of the loan.

(2) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section does not apply if:

(i) The loan is an extension of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural

purposes;

(ii) The loan is in a subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same residential

improved real estate or mobile home for which the borrower has obtained flood insurance

coverage that meets the requirements of § 22.3(a);

(iii) Flood insurance coverage for the residential improved real estate or mobile home is

provided by a policy that:

(A) Meets the requirements of § 22.3(a) of this section;

(B) Is provided by a condominium association, cooperative, homeowners association, or

other applicable group; and

104

(C) The premium for which is paid by the condominium association, cooperative,

homeowners association, or other applicable group as a common expense;

(iv) The loan is a home equity line of credit;

(v) The loan is a nonperforming loan, which is a loan that is 90 or more days past due and

remains nonperforming until it is permanently modified or until the entire amount past due,

including principal, accrued interest, and penalty interest incurred as the result of past due status,

is collected or otherwise discharged in full; or

(vi) The loan has a term of no longer than 12 months.

(3) Duration of exception. If a national bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer

acting its behalf, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed

on or after January 1, 2016, that an exception under paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not

apply, then the bank or savings association, or the servicer acting on its behalf, shall require the

escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under § 22.3(a) as soon as

reasonably practicable and, if applicable, shall provide any disclosure required under section 10

of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA).

(4) Escrow account. The national bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting

on its behalf, shall deposit the flood insurance premiums and fees on behalf of the borrower in an

escrow account. This escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to

section 10 of RESPA, which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in escrow

accounts for certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements for those accounts,

only if the loan is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the

Administrator of FEMA or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the national

105

bank or Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall pay the amount owed

to the insurance provider from the escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

(b) Notice. For any loan for which a national bank or Federal savings association is

required to escrow under paragraphs (a)(1) or (c)(2) of this section or may be required to escrow

under paragraphs (a)(3) of this section during the term of the loan, the national bank or Federal

savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail or deliver a written notice with

the notice provided under § 22.9 informing the borrower that the national bank or Federal

savings association is required to escrow all premiums and fees for required flood insurance,

using language that is substantially similar to model clauses on the escrow requirement in

appendix A.

(c) Small lender exception. (1) Qualification. Except as may be required under applicable

State law, paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) of this section do not apply to a national bank or Federal

savings association:

(i) That has total assets of less than $1 billion as of December 31 of either of the two

prior calendar years; and

(ii) On or before July 6, 2012:

(A) Was not required under Federal or State law to deposit taxes, insurance premiums,

fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire term of any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home; and

(B) Did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes,

insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for any loans secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home.

106

(2) Change in status. If a national bank or Federal savings association previously

qualified for the exception in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, but no longer qualifies for the

exception because it had assets of $1 billion or more for two consecutive calendar year ends, the

national bank or Federal savings association must escrow premiums and fees for flood insurance

pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section for any designated loan made, increased, extended, or

renewed on or after July 1 of the first calendar year of changed status.

(d) Option to escrow. (1) In general. A national bank or Federal savings association, or a

servicer acting on its behalf, shall offer and make available to the borrower the option to escrow

all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under § 22.3 for any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is outstanding on January 1, 2016, or July

1 of the first calendar year in which the national bank or Federal savings association has had a

change in status pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, unless:

(i) The loan or the national bank or Federal savings association qualifies for an exception

from the escrow requirement under paragraphs (a)(2) or (c) of this section, respectively;

(ii) The borrower is already escrowing all premiums and fees for flood insurance for the

loan; or

(iii) The national bank or Federal savings association is required to escrow flood

insurance premiums and fees pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.

(2) Notice. For any loan subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the national bank or

Federal savings association, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail or deliver to the

borrower no later than June 30, 2016, or September 30 of the first calendar year in which the

national bank or Federal savings association has had a change in status pursuant to paragraph

(c)(2) of this section, a notice in writing, or if the borrower agrees, electronically, informing the

107

borrower of the option to escrow all premiums and fees for any required flood insurance and the

method(s) by which the borrower may request the escrow, using language similar to the model

clause in appendix B.

(3) Timing. The national bank or Federal savings association or the servicer acting on its

behalf, must begin escrowing premiums and fees for flood insurance as soon as reasonably

practicable after the bank or savings association, or servicer, receives the borrower’s request to

escrow.

b. Revising § 22.9(b) to read as follows:

§ 22.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

* * * * *

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available from private

insurance companies that issue standard flood insurance policies on behalf of the NFIP or

directly from the NFIP;

(4) A statement that flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a

standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP also may be available from a private insurance

company that issues policies on behalf of the company;

(5) A statement that the borrower is encouraged to compare the flood insurance coverage,

deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies

108

issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and

that the borrower should direct inquiries regarding the availability, cost, and comparisons of

flood insurance coverage to an insurance agent; and

(6) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

* * * * *

c. Revising Appendix A to read as follows:

APPENDIX A TO PART 22—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that: The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be

located in an area with special flood hazards. The area has been identified by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management

Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: __________. This area has a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Administrator of FEMA to

review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

109

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the building or mobile home and any personal property that secures your loan and not the land itself.

• Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be

available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community’s participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

• Although you may not be required to maintain flood insurance on all structures, you may

still wish to do so, and your mortgage lender may still require you to do so to protect the collateral securing the mortgage. If you choose not to maintain flood insurance on a structure and it floods, you are responsible for all flood losses relating to that structure.

Availability of Private Flood Insurance Coverage

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent

who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. You should compare the flood insurance coverage, deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and contact an insurance agent as to the availability, cost, and comparisons of flood insurance coverage.

[Escrow Requirement for Residential Loans

Federal law may require a lender or its servicer to escrow all premiums and fees for flood insurance that covers any residential building or mobile home securing a loan that is located in an area with special flood hazards. If your lender notifies you that an escrow account is required for your loan, then you must pay your flood insurance premiums and fees to the lender or its servicer with the same frequency as you make loan payments for the duration of your loan. These premiums and fees will be deposited in the escrow account, which will be used to pay the flood insurance provider.]

___Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally declared flood disaster.

d. Adding new Appendix B to read as follows:

APPENDIX B TO PART 22—SAMPLE CLAUSE FOR OPTION TO ESCROW FOR OUTSTANDING LOANS Escrow Option Clause

110

You have the option to escrow all premiums and fees for the payment on your flood insurance policy that covers any residential building or mobile home that is located in an area with special flood hazards and that secures your loan. If you choose this option:

• Your payments will be deposited in an escrow account to be paid to the flood insurance provider.

• The escrow amount for flood insurance will be added to the regular mortgage payment that you make to your lender or its servicer.

• The payments you make into the escrow account will accumulate over time and the funds will be used to pay your flood insurance policy when your lender or servicer receives a notice from your flood insurance provider that the flood insurance premium is due.

To choose this option, follow the instructions below. If you have any questions about the option, contact [Insert Name of Lender or Servicer] at [Insert Contact Information]. [Insert Instructions for Selecting to Escrow] PART 172 – [REMOVED]

3. Effective October 1, 2015, part 172 is removed.

111

Federal Reserve System

12 CFR CHAPTER II

Authority and Issuance

For the reasons set forth in the joint preamble, part 208 of chapter II of title 12 of the

Code of Federal Regulations is revised as set forth below:

PART 208--MEMBERSHIP OF STATE BANKING INSTITUTIONS IN THE FEDERAL

RESERVE SYSTEM (REGULATION H)

4. The authority citation for part 208 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 36, 248(a), 248(c), 321-338a, 371d, 461, 481-486, 601, 611, 1814,

1823(j), 1828(o), 1831o, 1831p-1, 3105, 3310, 3331-3351, and 3906-3909; 15 U.S.C. 78b,

781(b), 781(g), 781(i), 78o-4(c)(5), 78q, 78q-1, and 78w; 31 U.S.C. 5318; 42 U.S.C. 4012a,

4104a, 4104b, 4106, and 4128.

5. Effective October 1, 2015, § 208.25 is revised to read as follows:

§ 208.25 Loans in areas having special flood hazards.

(a) Purpose and scope — (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to implement the

requirements of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act

of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4129).

(2) Scope. This section, except for paragraphs (f) and (h) of this section, applies to loans

secured by buildings or mobile homes located or to be located in areas determined by the

Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to have special flood hazards.

Paragraphs (f) and (h) of this section apply to loans secured by buildings or mobile homes,

regardless of location.

(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:

112

(1) Act means the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-

4129).

(2) Administrator of FEMA means the Administrator of the Federal Emergency

Management Agency.

(3) Building means a walled and roofed structure, other than a gas or liquid storage tank,

that is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, and a walled and roofed

structure while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair.

(4) Community means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has zoning and

building code jurisdiction over a particular area having special flood hazards.

(5) Designated loan means a loan secured by a building or mobile home that is located or

to be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act.

(6) Mobile home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, that is built on

a permanent chassis and designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached

to the required utilities. The term mobile home does not include a recreational vehicle. For

purposes of this section, the term mobile home means a mobile home on a permanent foundation.

The term mobile home includes a manufactured home as that term is used in the NFIP.

(7) NFIP means the National Flood Insurance Program authorized under the Act.

(8) Residential improved real estate means real estate upon which a home or other

residential building is located or to be located.

(9) Servicer means the person responsible for:

(i) Receiving any scheduled, periodic payments from a borrower under the terms of a

loan, including amounts for taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges with respect to the

property securing the loan; and

113

(ii) Making payments of principal and interest and any other payments from the amounts

received from the borrower as may be required under the terms of the loan.

(10) Special flood hazard area means the land in the flood plain within a community

having at least a one percent chance of flooding in any given year, as designated by the

Administrator of FEMA.

(11) Table funding means a settlement at which a loan is funded by a contemporaneous

advance of loan funds and an assignment of the loan to the person advancing the funds.

(c) Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available — (1) In general. A

member bank shall not make, increase, extend, or renew any designated loan unless the building

or mobile home and any personal property securing the loan is covered by flood insurance for the

term of the loan. The amount of insurance must be at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding

principal balance of the designated loan or the maximum limit of coverage available for the

particular type of property under the Act. Flood insurance coverage under the Act is limited to

the building or mobile home and any personal property that secures a loan and not the land itself.

(2) Table funded loans. A member bank that acquires a loan from a mortgage broker or

other entity through table funding shall be considered to be making a loan for the purposes of

this section.

(d) Exemptions. The flood insurance requirement prescribed by paragraph (c) of this

section does not apply with respect to:

(1) Any State-owned property covered under a policy of self-insurance satisfactory to the

Administrator of FEMA, who publishes and periodically revises the list of States falling within

this exemption;

114

(2) Property securing any loan with an original principal balance of $5,000 or less and a

repayment term of one year or less; or

(3) Any structure that is a part of any residential property but is detached from the

primary residential structure of such property and does not serve as a residence. For purposes of

this paragraph (d)(3):

(i) “a structure that is a part of a residential property” is a structure used primarily for

personal, family, or household purposes, and not used primarily for agricultural, commercial,

industrial, or other business purposes;

(ii) a structure is “detached” from the primary residential structure if it is not joined by

any structural connection to that structure; and

(iii) “serve as a residence” shall be based upon the good faith determination of the

member bank that the structure is intended for use or actually used as a residence, which

generally includes sleeping, bathroom, or kitchen facilities.

(e) Escrow requirement. If a member bank requires the escrow of taxes, insurance

premiums, fees, or any other charges for a loan secured by residential improved real estate or a

mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed after October 1, 1996, the member

bank shall also require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required

under paragraph (c) of this section. The member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall

deposit the flood insurance premiums on behalf of the borrower in an escrow account. This

escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section 10 of the Real

Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA), which generally limits the

amount that may be maintained in escrow accounts for certain types of loans and requires escrow

account statements for those accounts, only if the loan is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following

115

receipt of a notice from the Administrator of FEMA or other provider of flood insurance that

premiums are due, the member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall pay the amount

owed to the insurance provider from the escrow account by the date when such premiums are

due.

(f) Required use of standard flood hazard determination form. (1) Use of form. A state

member bank shall use the standard flood hazard determination form developed by the

Administrator of FEMA when determining whether the building or mobile home offered as

collateral security for a loan is or will be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood

insurance is available under the Act. The standard flood hazard determination form may be used

in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner. A state member bank may obtain the standard

flood hazard determination form from FEMA’s Web site at www.fema.gov.

(2) Retention of form. A state member bank shall retain a copy of the completed standard

flood hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic form, for the period of time

the state member bank owns the loan.

(g) Force placement of flood insurance. (1) Notice and purchase of coverage. If a member

bank, or a servicer acting on behalf of the bank, determines at any time during the term of a

designated loan, that the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the

designated loan is not covered by flood insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount

less than the amount required under paragraph (c) of this section, then the member bank or its

servicer shall notify the borrower that the borrower should obtain flood insurance, at the

borrower’s expense, in an amount at least equal to the amount required under paragraph (c) of

this section, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood insurance

within 45 days after notification, then the member bank or its servicer shall purchase insurance

116

on the borrower’s behalf. The member bank or its servicer may charge the borrower for the cost

of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred

for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide

a sufficient coverage amount.

(2) Termination of force-placed insurance. (i) Termination and refund. Within 30 days of

receipt by a member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of a borrower’s

existing flood insurance coverage, the member bank or its servicer shall:

(A) notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the member

bank or its servicer under paragraph (g)(1) of this section; and

(B) refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance

purchased by the member bank or its servicer under paragraph (g)(1) of this section during any

period during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage

purchased by the member bank or its servicer were each in effect, and any related fees charged to

the borrower with respect to the insurance purchased by the member bank or its servicer during

such period.

(ii) Sufficiency of demonstration. For purposes of confirming a borrower’s existing flood

insurance coverage under paragraph (g)(2) of this section, a member bank or its servicer shall

accept from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood

insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company

or agent.

(h) Determination fees. — (1) General. Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other

than the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4129), any member

bank, or a servicer acting on behalf of the bank, may charge a reasonable fee for determining

117

whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located or will be located in a special

flood hazard area. A determination fee may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-

loan monitoring.

(2) Borrower fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (h)(1) of this section

may be charged to the borrower if the determination:

(i) is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan

that is initiated by the borrower;

(ii) reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s revision or updating of flood plain areas or

flood-risk zones;

(iii) reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s publication of a notice or compendium that:

(A) affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or

(B) by determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a

determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood

hazard area; or

(iv) results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the lender or its servicer on

behalf of the borrower under paragraph (g) of this section.

(3) Purchaser or transferee fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (h)(1) of

this section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or

transfer of the loan.

(i) Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

When a member bank makes, increases, extends, or renews a loan secured by a building or a

mobile home located or to be located in a special flood hazard area, the bank shall mail or deliver

118

a written notice to the borrower and to the servicer in all cases whether or not flood insurance is

available under the Act for the collateral securing the loan.

(1) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(i) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or the

mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(ii) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(iii) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available under the

NFIP and may also be available from private insurers; and

(iv) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event

of damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

(2) Timing of notice. The member bank shall provide the notice required by paragraph

(i)(1) of this section to the borrower within a reasonable time before the completion of the

transaction, and to the servicer as promptly as practicable after the bank provides notice to the

borrower and in any event no later than the time the bank provides other similar notices to the

servicer concerning hazard insurance and taxes. Notice to the servicer may be made

electronically or may take the form of a copy of the notice to the borrower.

(3) Record of receipt. The member bank shall retain a record of the receipt of the notices

by the borrower and the servicer for the period of time the bank owns the loan.

(4) Alternate method of notice. Instead of providing the notice to the borrower required

by paragraph (i)(1) of this section, a member bank may obtain satisfactory written assurance

from a seller or lessor that, within a reasonable time before the completion of the sale or lease

transaction, the seller or lessor has provided such notice to the purchaser or lessee. The member

119

bank shall retain a record of the written assurance from the seller or lessor for the period of time

the bank owns the loan.

(5) Use of sample form of notice. A member bank will be considered to be in compliance

with the requirement for notice to the borrower of this paragraph (i) of this section by providing

written notice to the borrower containing the language presented in appendix A of this section

within a reasonable time before the completion of the transaction. The notice presented in

appendix A of this section satisfies the borrower notice requirements of the Act.

(j) Notice of servicer’s identity — (1) Notice requirement. When a member bank makes,

increases, extends, renews, sells, or transfers a loan secured by a building or mobile home

located or to be located in a special flood hazard area, the bank shall notify the Administrator of

FEMA (or the Administrator’s designee) in writing of the identity of the servicer of the loan. The

Administrator of FEMA has designated the insurance provider to receive the member bank's

notice of the servicer’s identity. This notice may be provided electronically if electronic

transmission is satisfactory to the Administrator of FEMA’s designee.

(2) Transfer of servicing rights. The member bank shall notify the Administrator of

FEMA (or the Administrator’s designee) of any change in the servicer of a loan described in

paragraph (j)(1) of this section within 60 days after the effective date of the change. This notice

may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to the Administrator of

FEMA’s designee. Upon any change in the servicing of a loan described in paragraph (j)(1) of

this section, the duty to provide notice under this paragraph (j)(2) of this section shall transfer to

the transferee servicer.

Appendix A to § 208.25 —SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE

Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

120

We are giving you this notice to inform you that:

The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be located in an area with special flood hazards.

The area has been identified by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: __________. This area has a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Director of FEMA to review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance also may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or

(2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the overall value of the property securing the loan minus the value of the land on which the property is located.

• Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community's participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

___Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally declared flood disaster.

121

6. Effective January 1, 2016, § 208.25 is amended by:

a. Revising § 208.25(e) to read as follows:

§ 208.25 Loans in areas having special flood hazards.

* * * * *

(e) Escrow requirement. (1) In general. (i) Applicability. Except as provided in

paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) or (e)(3) of this section, a member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf,

shall require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under

paragraph (c) of this section for any designated loan secured by residential improved real estate

or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016,

payable with the same frequency as payments on the designated loan are required to be made for

the duration of the loan.

(ii) Exceptions. Paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section does not apply if:

(A) The loan is an extension of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural

purposes;

(B) The loan is in a subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same residential

improved real estate or mobile home for which the borrower has obtained flood insurance

coverage that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;

(C) Flood insurance coverage for the residential improved real estate or mobile home is

provided by a policy that:

(1) Meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;

(2) Is provided by a condominium association, cooperative, homeowners association, or

other applicable group; and

122

(3) The premium for which is paid by the condominium association, cooperative,

homeowners association, or other applicable group as a common expense;

(D) The loan is a home equity line of credit;

(E) The loan is a nonperforming loan, which is a loan that is 90 or more days past due

and remains nonperforming until it is permanently modified or until the entire amount past due,

including principal, accrued interest, and penalty interest incurred as the result of past due status,

is collected or otherwise discharged in full; or

(F) The loan has a term of not longer than 12 months.

(iii) Duration of exception. If a member bank, or a servicer acting on behalf of the bank,

determines at any time during the term of a designated loan secured by residential improved real

estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1,

2016, that an exception under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section does not apply, then the bank or

its servicer shall require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required

under paragraph (c) of this section as soon as reasonably practicable and, if applicable, shall

provide any disclosure required under section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of

1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA).

(iv) Escrow account. The member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall deposit

the flood insurance premiums and fees on behalf of the borrower in an escrow account. This

escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section 10 of

RESPA, which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in escrow accounts for

certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements for those accounts, only if the loan

is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the Administrator of FEMA

or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the member bank, or a servicer

123

acting on its behalf, shall pay the amount owed to the insurance provider from the escrow

account by the date when such premiums are due.

(2) Notice. For any loan for which a member bank is required to escrow under paragraphs

(e)(1) or (e)(3)(ii) of this section or may be required to escrow under paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this

section during the term of the loan, the member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail

or deliver a written notice with the notice provided under paragraph (i) of this section informing

the borrower that the member bank is required to escrow all premiums and fees for required

flood insurance, using language that is substantially similar to model clauses on the escrow

requirement in appendix A.

(3) Small lender exception. (i) Qualification. Except as may be required under applicable

State law, paragraphs (e)(1), (2), and (4) of this section do not apply to a member bank:

(A) That has total assets of less than $1 billion as of December 31 of either of the two

prior calendar years; and

(B) On or before July 6, 2012:

(1) Was not required under Federal or State law to deposit taxes, insurance premiums,

fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire term of any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home; and

(2) Did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes,

insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for any loans secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home.

(ii) Change in status. If a member bank previously qualified for the exception in

paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section, but no longer qualifies for the exception because it had assets

of $1 billion or more for two consecutive calendar year ends, the member bank must escrow

124

premiums and fees for flood insurance pursuant to paragraph (e)(1) of this section for any

designated loan made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after July 1 of the first calendar

year of changed status.

(4) Option to escrow. (i) In general. A member bank, or a servicer acting on its behalf,

shall offer and make available to the borrower the option to escrow all premiums and fees for

any flood insurance required under paragraph (c) of this section for any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is outstanding on January 1, 2016, or July

1 of the first calendar year in which the member bank has had a change in status pursuant to

paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section, unless:

(A) The loan or the member bank qualifies for an exception from the escrow requirement

under paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) or (e)(3) of this section, respectively;

(B) The borrower is already escrowing all premiums and fees for flood insurance for the

loan; or

(C) The member bank is required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees pursuant

to paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

(ii) Notice. For any loan subject to paragraph (e)(4)(i) of this section, the member bank,

or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail or deliver to the borrower no later than June 30,

2016, or September 30 of the first calendar year in which the member bank has had a change in

status pursuant to paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section, a notice in writing, or if the borrower

agrees, electronically, informing the borrower of the option to escrow all premiums and fees for

any required flood insurance and the method(s) by which the borrower may request the escrow,

using language similar to the model clause in appendix B.

125

(iii) Timing. The member bank or servicer must begin escrowing premiums and fees for

flood insurance as soon as reasonably practicable after the member bank or servicer receives the

borrower’s request to escrow.

* * * * *

b. Revising § 208.25(i)(1) to read as follows:

§ 208.25 Loans in areas having special flood hazards.

* * * * *

(i) * * *

(1) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(i) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or the

mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(ii) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(iii) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available from

private insurance companies that issue standard flood insurance policies on behalf of the NFIP or

directly from the NFIP;

(iv) A statement that flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a

standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP also may be available from a private insurance

company that issues policies on behalf of the company;

(v) A statement that the borrower is encouraged to compare the flood insurance coverage,

deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies

issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and

126

that the borrower should direct inquiries regarding the availability, cost, and comparisons of

flood insurance coverage to an insurance agent; and

(vi) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event

of damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

* * * * *

c. Revising Appendix A to § 208.25, Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance to read as follows:

Appendix A to § 208.25 —SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE

Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that: The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be

located in an area with special flood hazards. The area has been identified by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management

Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: __________. This area has a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Administrator of FEMA to

review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the building or mobile home and any

personal property that secures your loan and not the land itself.

127

• Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be

available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community’s participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

• Although you may not be required to maintain flood insurance on all structures, you may

still wish to do so, and your mortgage lender may still require you to do so to protect the collateral securing the mortgage. If you choose not to maintain flood insurance on a structure and it floods, you are responsible for all flood losses relating to that structure.

Availability of Private Flood Insurance Coverage

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent

who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. You should compare the flood insurance coverage, deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and contact an insurance agent as to the availability, cost, and comparisons of flood insurance coverage.

[Escrow Requirement for Residential Loans

Federal law may require a lender or its servicer to escrow all premiums and fees for flood insurance that covers any residential building or mobile home securing a loan that is located in an area with special flood hazards. If your lender notifies you that an escrow account is required for your loan, then you must pay your flood insurance premiums and fees to the lender or its servicer with the same frequency as you make loan payments for the duration of your loan. These premiums and fees will be deposited in the escrow account, which will be used to pay the flood insurance provider.]

___Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally declared flood disaster.

d. Adding Appendix B to § 208.25 Sample Clause for Option to Escrow for Outstanding Loans, to read as follows: Appendix B to § 208.25 –SAMPLE CLAUSE FOR OPTION TO ESCROW FOR OUTSTANDING LOANS

Escrow Option Clause

128

You have the option to escrow all premiums and fees for the payment on your flood insurance policy that covers any residential building or mobile home that is located in an area with special flood hazards and that secures your loan. If you choose this option:

• Your payments will be deposited in an escrow account to be paid to the flood insurance provider.

• The escrow amount for flood insurance will be added to the regular mortgage payment that you make to your lender or its servicer.

• The payments you make into the escrow account will accumulate over time and the funds will be used to pay your flood insurance policy when your lender or servicer receives a notice from your flood insurance provider that the flood insurance premium is due.

To choose this option, follow the instructions below. If you have any questions about the option, contact [Insert Name of Lender or Servicer] at [Insert Contact Information]. [Insert Instructions for Selecting to Escrow]

129

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

12 CFR CHAPTER III

Authority and Issuance

For the reasons set forth in the joint preamble, the Board of Directors of the FDIC

amends part 339 of chapter III of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations to read as follows:

7. Effective October 1, 2015, part 339 is revised to read as follows:

PART 339--LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS

Sec.

339.1 Authority, purpose, and scope.

339.2 Definitions.

339.3 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

339.4 Exemptions.

339.5 Escrow requirement.

339.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form.

339.7 Force placement of flood insurance.

339.8 Determination fees.

339.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

339.10 Notice of servicer’s identity.

Appendix A to Part 339 – Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of

Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

§ 339.1 Authority, purpose, and scope.

(a) Authority. This part is issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1819 (Tenth),

5412(b)(2)(C) and 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a, 4104b, 4106, and 4128.

130

(b) Purpose. The purpose of this part is to implement the requirements of the National

Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42

U.S.C. 4001-4129).

(c) Scope. This part, except for §§ 339.6 and 339.8, applies to loans secured by buildings

or mobile homes located or to be located in areas determined by the Administrator of the Federal

Emergency Management Agency to have special flood hazards. Sections 339.6 and 339.8 apply

to loans secured by buildings or mobile homes, regardless of location.

§ 339.2 Definitions.

(a) Act means the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001 –

4129).

(b) Administrator of FEMA means the Administrator of the Federal Emergency

Management Agency.

(c) Building means a walled and roofed structure, other than a gas or liquid storage tank,

that is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, and a walled and roofed

structure while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair.

(d) Community means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has zoning and

building code jurisdiction over a particular area having special flood hazards.

(e) Designated loan means a loan secured by a building or mobile home that is located or

to be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act.

(f) FDIC-supervised institution means any insured depository institution for which the

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is the appropriate Federal banking agency pursuant to

section 3(g) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(g).

131

(g) Mobile home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, that is built on

a permanent chassis and designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached

to the required utilities. The term mobile home does not include a recreational vehicle. For

purposes of this part, the term mobile home means a mobile home on a permanent foundation.

The term mobile home includes a manufactured home as that term is used in the NFIP.

(h) NFIP means the National Flood Insurance Program authorized under the Act.

(i) Residential improved real estate means real estate upon which a home or other

residential building is located or to be located.

(j) Servicer means the person responsible for:

(1) Receiving any scheduled, periodic payments from a borrower under the terms of a

loan, including amounts for taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges with respect to the

property securing the loan; and

(2) Making payments of principal and interest and any other payments from the amounts

received from the borrower as may be required under the terms of the loan.

(k) Special flood hazard area means the land in the flood plain within a community

having at least a one percent chance of flooding in any given year, as designated by the

Administrator of FEMA.

(l) Table funding means a settlement at which a loan is funded by a contemporaneous

advance of loan funds and an assignment of the loan to the person advancing the funds.

§ 339.3 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

(a) In general. An FDIC-supervised institution shall not make, increase, extend, or renew

any designated loan unless the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the

loan is covered by flood insurance for the term of the loan. The amount of insurance must be at

132

least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the designated loan or the

maximum limit of coverage available for the particular type of property under the Act. Flood

insurance coverage under the Act is limited to the building or mobile home and any personal

property that secures a loan and not the land itself.

(b) Table funded loans. An FDIC-supervised institution that acquires a loan from a

mortgage broker or other entity through table funding shall be considered to be making a loan for

the purpose of this part.

§ 339.4 Exemptions.

The flood insurance requirement prescribed by § 339.3 does not apply with respect to:

(a) Any state-owned property covered under a policy of self-insurance satisfactory to the

Administrator of FEMA, who publishes and periodically revises the list of states falling within

this exemption;

(b) Property securing any loan with an original principal balance of $5,000 or less and a

repayment term of one year or less; or

(c) Any structure that is a part of any residential property but is detached from the

primary residential structure of such property and does not serve as a residence. For purposes of

this paragraph (c):

(1) “a structure that is a part of a residential property” is a structure used primarily for

personal, family, or household purposes, and not used primarily for agricultural, commercial,

industrial, or other business purposes;

(2) a structure is “detached” from the primary residential structure if it is not joined by

any structural connection to that structure; and

133

(3) “serve as a residence” shall be based upon the good faith determination of the FDIC-

supervised institution that the structure is intended for use or actually used as a residence, which

generally includes sleeping, bathroom, or kitchen facilities.

§ 339.5 Escrow requirement.

If an FDIC-supervised institution requires the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums, fees,

or any other charges for a loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that

is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after October 1, 1996, the FDIC-supervised

institution shall also require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required

under § 339.3. The FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on behalf of the FDIC-

supervised institution, shall deposit the flood insurance premiums on behalf of the borrower in an

escrow account. This escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to

section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA),

which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in escrow accounts for certain types of

loans and requires escrow account statements for those accounts, only if the loan is otherwise

subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the Administrator of FEMA or other

provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer

acting on behalf of the FDIC-supervised institution, shall pay the amount owed to the insurance

provider from the escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

§ 339.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form.

(a) Use of form. An FDIC-supervised institution shall use the standard flood hazard

determination form developed by the Administrator of FEMA when determining whether the

building or mobile home offered as collateral security for a loan is or will be located in a special

flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act. The standard flood hazard

134

determination form may be used in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner. An FDIC-

supervised institution may obtain the standard flood hazard determination form from FEMA’s

website at www.fema.gov.

(b) Retention of form. An FDIC-supervised institution shall retain a copy of the

completed standard flood hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic form, for

the period of time the FDIC-supervised institution owns the loan.

§ 339.7 Force placement of flood insurance.

(a) Notice and purchase of coverage. If an FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer

acting on its behalf, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan, that the building

or mobile home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered by flood

insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required under

§ 339.3, then the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer shall notify the borrower that the

borrower should obtain flood insurance, at the borrower’s expense, in an amount at least equal to

the amount required under § 339.3, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to

obtain flood insurance within 45 days after notification, then the FDIC-supervised institution or

its servicer shall purchase insurance on the borrower’s behalf. The FDIC-supervised institution

or its servicer may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing

the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which

flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient coverage amount.

(b) Termination of force-placed insurance. (1) Termination and refund. Within 30 days of

receipt by an FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of

a borrower’s existing flood insurance coverage, the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer

shall:

135

(A) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the FDIC-

supervised institution or its servicer under paragraph (a) of this section; and

(B) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance

purchased by the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer under paragraph (a) of this section

during any period during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the insurance

coverage purchased by the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer were each in effect, and

any related fees charged to the borrower with respect to the insurance purchased by the FDIC-

supervised institution or its servicer during such period.

(2) Sufficiency of demonstration. For purposes of confirming a borrower’s existing flood

insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, an FDIC-supervised institution or its

servicer shall accept from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the

existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the

insurance company or agent.

§ 339.8 Determination fees.

(a) General. Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other than the Flood Disaster

Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001--4129), any FDIC-supervised institution, or

a servicer acting on its behalf, may charge a reasonable fee for determining whether the building

or mobile home securing the loan is located or will be located in a special flood hazard area. A

determination fee may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-loan monitoring.

(b) Borrower fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may

be charged to the borrower if the determination:

(1) Is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan

that is initiated by the borrower;

136

(2) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s revision or updating of floodplain areas or

flood-risk zones;

(3) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s publication of a notice or compendium that:

(i) Affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or

(ii) By determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a

determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood

hazard area; or

(4) Results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the lender or its servicer on

behalf of the borrower under § 339.7.

(c) Purchaser or transferee fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this

section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or transfer

of the loan.

§ 339.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

(a) Notice requirement. When an FDIC-supervised institution makes, increases, extends,

or renews a loan secured by a building or a mobile home located or to be located in a special

flood hazard area, the FDIC-supervised institution shall mail or deliver a written notice to the

borrower and to the servicer in all cases whether or not flood insurance is available under the Act

for the collateral securing the loan.

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

137

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available under the

NFIP and may also be available from private insurers; and

(4) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally-declared disaster.

(c) Timing of notice. The FDIC-supervised institution shall provide the notice required

by paragraph (a) of this section to the borrower within a reasonable time before the completion

of the transaction, and to the servicer as promptly as practicable after the FDIC-supervised

institution provides notice to the borrower and in any event no later than the time the FDIC-

supervised institution provides other similar notices to the servicer concerning hazard insurance

and taxes. Notice to the servicer may be made electronically or may take the form of a copy of

the notice to the borrower.

(d) Record of receipt. The FDIC-supervised institution shall retain a record of the receipt

of the notices by the borrower and the servicer for the period of time the FDIC-supervised

institution owns the loan.

(e) Alternate method of notice. Instead of providing the notice to the borrower required

by paragraph (a) of this section, an FDIC-supervised institution may obtain satisfactory written

assurance from a seller or lessor that, within a reasonable time before the completion of the sale

or lease transaction, the seller or lessor has provided such notice to the purchaser or lessee. The

FDIC-supervised institution shall retain a record of the written assurance from the seller or lessor

for the period of time the FDIC-supervised institution owns the loan.

(f) Use of sample form of notice. An FDIC-supervised institution will be considered to be

in compliance with the requirement for notice to the borrower of this section by providing

written notice to the borrower containing the language presented in appendix A to this part

138

within a reasonable time before the completion of the transaction. The notice presented in

appendix A to this part satisfies the borrower notice requirements of the Act.

§ 339.10 Notice of servicer’s identity.

(a) Notice requirement. When an FDIC-supervised institution makes, increases, extends,

renews, sells, or transfers a loan secured by a building or mobile home located or to be located in

a special flood hazard area, the FDIC-supervised institution shall notify the Administrator of

FEMA (or the Administrator of FEMA’s designee) in writing of the identity of the servicer of the

loan. The Administrator of FEMA has designated the insurance provider to receive the FDIC-

supervised institution’s notice of the servicer’s identity. This notice may be provided

electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to the Administrator of FEMA’s designee.

(b) Transfer of servicing rights. The FDIC-supervised institution shall notify the

Administrator of FEMA (or the Administrator of FEMA’s designee) of any change in the

servicer of a loan described in paragraph (a) of this section within 60 days after the effective date

of the change. This notice may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is

satisfactory to the Administrator or his or her designee. Upon any change in the servicing of a

loan described in paragraph (a) of this section, the duty to provide notice under this paragraph (b)

shall transfer to the transferee servicer.

APPENDIX A TO PART 339—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that: The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be located in an area with special flood hazards. The area has been identified by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: ________. This area has at least a one

139

percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%). Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Director of FEMA to review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information. ___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense. • Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance also may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. • At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of: (1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP. Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the overall value of the property securing the loan minus the value of the land on which the property is located. • Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community's participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

___ Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally-declared flood disaster.

8. Effective January 1, 2016, part 339 is amended by:

a. Revising §339.5 to read as follows:

140

§ 339.5 Escrow requirement.

(a) In general. (1) Applicability. Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) or (c) of this

section, an FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall require the

escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under § 339.3(a) for any

designated loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made,

increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016, payable with the same frequency as

payments on the designated loan are required to be made for the duration of the loan.

(2) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section does not apply if:

(i) The loan is an extension of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural

purposes;

(ii) The loan is in a subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same residential

improved real estate or mobile home for which the borrower has obtained flood insurance

coverage that meets the requirements of § 339.3(a);

(iii) Flood insurance coverage for the residential improved real estate or mobile home is

provided by a policy that:

(A) Meets the requirements of § 339.3(a);

(B) Is provided by a condominium association, cooperative, homeowners association, or

other applicable group; and

(C) The premium for which is paid by the condominium association, cooperative,

homeowners association, or other applicable group as a common expense;

(iv) The loan is a home equity line of credit;

(v) The loan is a nonperforming loan, which is a loan that is 90 or more days past due and

remains nonperforming until it is permanently modified or until the entire amount past due,

141

including principal, accrued interest, and penalty interest incurred as the result of past due status,

is collected or otherwise discharged in full; or

(vi) The loan has a term of not longer than 12 months.

(3) Duration of exception. If an FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its

behalf, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan secured by residential

improved real estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after

January 1, 2016, that an exception under paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not apply, then the

FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer shall require the escrow of all premiums and fees for

any flood insurance required under § 339.3(a) as soon as reasonably practicable and, if

applicable, shall provide any disclosure required under section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement

Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA).

(4) Escrow account. The FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf,

shall deposit the flood insurance premiums and fees on behalf of the borrower in an escrow

account. This escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section

10 of RESPA, which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in escrow accounts for

certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements for those accounts, only if the loan

is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the Administrator of FEMA

or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the FDIC-supervised institution, or a

servicer acting on its behalf, shall pay the amount owed to the insurance provider from the

escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

(b) Notice. For any loan for which an FDIC-supervised institution is required to escrow

under paragraph (a) or paragraph (c)(2) of this section or may be required to escrow under

paragraph (a)(3) of this section during the term of the loan, the FDIC-supervised institution, or a

142

servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail or deliver a written notice with the notice provided under

§ 339.9 informing the borrower that the FDIC-supervised institution is required to escrow all

premiums and fees for required flood insurance, using language that is substantially similar to

model clauses on the escrow requirement in appendix A.

(c) Small lender exception. (1) Qualification. Except as may be required under applicable

State law, paragraphs (a), (b) and (d) of this section do not apply to an FDIC-supervised

institution:

(i) That has total assets of less than $1 billion as of December 31 of either of the two

prior calendar years; and

(ii) On or before July 6, 2012:

(A) Was not required under Federal or State law to deposit taxes, insurance premiums,

fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire term of any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home; and

(B) Did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes,

insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for any loans secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home.

(2) Change in status. If an FDIC-supervised institution previously qualified for the

exception in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, but no longer qualifies for the exception because it

had assets of $1 billion or more for two consecutive calendar year ends, the FDIC-supervised

institution must escrow premiums and fees for flood insurance pursuant to paragraph (a) for any

designated loan made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after July 1 of the first calendar

year of changed status.

143

(d) Option to escrow. (1) In general. An FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting

on its behalf, shall offer and make available to the borrower the option to escrow all premiums

and fees for any flood insurance required under § 339.3 for any loan secured by residential

improved real estate or a mobile home that is outstanding on January 1, 2016, or July 1 of the

first calendar year in which the FDIC-supervised institution has had a change in status pursuant

to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, unless:

(i) The loan or the FDIC-supervised institution qualifies for an exception from the escrow

requirement under paragraphs (a)(2) or (c) of this section, respectively;

(ii) The borrower is already escrowing all premiums and fees for flood insurance for the

loan; or

(iii) The FDIC-supervised institution is required to escrow flood insurance premiums and

fees pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.

(2) Notice. For any loan subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the FDIC-supervised

institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail or deliver to the borrower no later than

June 30, 2016, or September 30 of the first calendar year in which the FDIC-supervised

institution has had a change in status pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, a notice in

writing, or if the borrower agrees, electronically, informing the borrower of the option to escrow

all premiums and fees for any required flood insurance and the method(s) by which the borrower

may request the escrow, using language similar to the model clause in appendix B.

(3) Timing. The FDIC-supervised institution or servicer must begin escrowing premiums

and fees for flood insurance as soon as reasonably practicable after the FDIC-supervised

institution or servicer receives the borrower’s request to escrow.

b. Revising § 339.9(b) to read as follows:

144

§ 339.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

* * * * *

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available from private

insurance companies that issue standard flood insurance policies on behalf of the NFIP or

directly from the NFIP;

(4) A statement that flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a

standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may also be available from a private insurance

company that issues policies on behalf of the company.

(5) A statement that the borrower is encouraged to compare the flood insurance coverage,

deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies

issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and

that the borrower should direct inquiries regarding the availability, cost, and comparisons of

flood insurance coverage to an insurance agent; and

(6) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

c. Revise Appendix A to Part 339, Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and

Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance to read as follows:

145

Appendix A to Part 339—Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and

Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that: The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be

located in an area with special flood hazards. The area has been identified by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management

Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: __________. This area has a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Administrator of FEMA to

review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the building or mobile home and any

personal property that secures your loan and not the land itself. • Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be

available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community’s participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

• Although you may not be required to maintain flood insurance on all structures, you may

still wish to do so, and your mortgage lender may still require you to do so to protect the collateral securing the mortgage. If you choose not to maintain flood insurance on a structure and it floods, you are responsible for all flood losses relating to that structure.

146

Availability of Private Flood Insurance Coverage

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. You should compare the flood insurance coverage, deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and contact an insurance agent as to the availability, cost, and comparisons of flood insurance coverage.

[Escrow Requirement for Residential Loans

Federal law may require a lender or its servicer to escrow all premiums and fees for flood insurance that covers any residential building or mobile home securing a loan that is located in an area with special flood hazards. If your lender notifies you that an escrow account is required for your loan, then you must pay your flood insurance premiums and fees to the lender or its servicer with the same frequency as you make loan payments for the duration of your loan. These premiums and fees will be deposited in the escrow account, which will be used to pay the flood insurance provider.]

___Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally declared flood disaster.

d. Add Appendix B to Part 339 Sample Clause for Option to Escrow for Outstanding Loans, to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 339 – SAMPLE CLAUSE FOR OPTION TO ESCROW FOR OUTSTANDING LOANS

Escrow Option Clause

You have the option to escrow all premiums and fees for the payment on your flood insurance policy that covers any residential building or mobile home that is located in an area with special flood hazards and that secures your loan. If you choose this option:

• Your payments will be deposited in an escrow account to be paid to the flood insurance provider.

• The escrow amount for flood insurance will be added to the regular mortgage payment that you make to your lender or its servicer.

147

• The payments you make into the escrow account will accumulate over time and the funds will be used to pay your flood insurance policy when your lender or servicer receives a notice from your flood insurance provider that the flood insurance premium is due.

To choose this option, follow the instructions below. If you have any questions about the option, contact [Insert Name of Lender or Servicer] at [Insert Contact Information]. [Insert Instructions for Selecting to Escrow]

148

Farm Credit Administration

12 CFR CHAPTER VI

Authority and Issuance

For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 614 of chapter VI, title 12 of the Code of Federal

Regulations is revised as follows:

PART 614--LOAN POLICIES AND OPERATIONS

9. The authority citation for part 614 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a, 4104b, 4106, and 4128; secs. 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, 1.10, 2.0,

2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.10, 2.12, 2.13, 2.15, 3.0, 3.1, 3.3, 3.7, 3.8, 3.10, 3.20, 3.28, 4.12, 4.12A, 4.13,

4.13B, 4.14, 4.14A, 4.14C, 4.14D, 4.14E, 4.18, 4.19, 4.36, 4.37, 5.9, 5.10, 5.17, 7.0, 7.2, 7.6, 7.7,

7.8, 7.12, 7.13, 8.0, 8.5 of the Farm Credit Act (12 U.S.C. 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018,

2071, 2073, 2074, 2075, 2091, 2093, 2094, 2096, 2121, 2122, 2124, 2128, 2129, 2131, 2141,

2149, 2183, 2184, 2199, 2201, 2202, 2202a, 2202c, 2202d, 2202e, 2206, 2207, 2219a, 2219b,

2243, 2244, 2252, 2279a, 2279a-2, 2279b, 2279b-1, 2279b-2, 2279f, 2279f-1, 2279aa, 2279aa-

5); sec. 413 of Pub. L. 100-233, 101 Stat. 1568, 1639.

10. Effective October 1, 2015, part 614 is amended by revising subpart S to read as

follows:

Subpart S--Flood Insurance Requirements

Sec.

614.4920 Purpose, and scope.

614.4925 Definitions.

614.4930 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

614.4932 Exemptions.

149

614.4935 Escrow requirement.

614.4940 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form.

614.4945 Force placement of flood insurance.

614.4950 Determination fees.

614.4955 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

614.4960 Notice of servicer’s identity.

APPENDIX A TO SUBPART S OF PART 614—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL

FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF

ASSISTANCE

Subpart S—Flood Insurance Requirements § 614.4920 Purpose and scope.

(a) Purpose. This subpart implements the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the

Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4129).

(b) Scope. This subpart, except for §§ 614.4940 and 614.4950, applies to loans secured

by buildings or mobile homes located or to be located in areas determined by the Administrator

of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to have special flood hazards. Sections

614.4940 and 614.4950 apply to loans secured by buildings or mobile homes, regardless of

location.

§ 614.4925 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart:

1968 Act means the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster

Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001–4129).

150

Administrator of FEMA means the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management

Agency.

Building means a walled and roofed structure, other than a gas or liquid storage tank, that

is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, and a walled and roofed structure

while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair.

Community means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has zoning and

building code jurisdiction over a particular area having special flood hazards.

Designated loan means a loan secured by a building or mobile home that is located or to

be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the 1968

Act.

Mobile home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, that is built on a

permanent chassis and designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to

the required utilities. The term mobile home does not include a recreational vehicle. For purposes

of this subpart, the term mobile home means a mobile home on a permanent foundation. The

term mobile home includes a manufactured home as that term is used in the NFIP.

NFIP means the National Flood Insurance Program authorized under the 1968 Act.

Residential improved real estate means real estate upon which a home or other residential

building is located or to be located.

Servicer means the person responsible for:

(1) Receiving any scheduled, periodic payments from a borrower under the terms of a

loan, including amounts for taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges with respect to the

property securing the loan; and

151

(2) Making payments of principal and interest and any other payments from the amounts

received from the borrower as may be required under the terms of the loan.

Special flood hazard area means the land in the flood plain within a community having at

least a one percent chance of flooding in any given year, as designated by the Administrator of

FEMA.

Table funding means a settlement at which a loan is funded by a contemporaneous

advance of loan funds and an assignment of the loan to the person advancing the funds.

§ 614.4930 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

(a) In general. A System institution shall not make, increase, extend, or renew any

designated loan unless the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the loan

is covered by flood insurance for the term of the loan. The amount of insurance must be at least

equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the designated loan or the maximum

limit of coverage available for the particular type of property under the 1968 Act. Flood

insurance coverage under the 1968 Act is limited to the building or mobile home and any

personal property that secures a loan and not the land itself.

(b) Table funded loans. A System institution that acquires a loan from a mortgage broker

or other entity through table funding shall be considered to be making a loan for the purposes of

this subpart.

§ 614.4932 Exemptions.

The flood insurance requirement prescribed by § 614.4930 does not apply with respect to:

(a) Any State-owned property covered under a policy of self-insurance satisfactory to the

Administrator of FEMA, who publishes and periodically revises the list of States falling within

this exemption;

152

(b) Property securing any loan with an original principal balance of $5,000 or less and a

repayment term of one year or less; or

(c) Any structure that is a part of any residential property but is detached from the

primary residential structure of such property and does not serve as a residence. For purposes of

this paragraph (c):

(1) “A structure that is a part of a residential property” is a structure used primarily for

personal, family, or household purposes, and not used primarily for agricultural, commercial,

industrial, or other business purposes;

(2) A structure is “detached” from the primary residential structure if it is not joined by

any structural connection to that structure; and

(3) “Serve as a residence” shall be based upon the good faith determination of the System

institution that the structure is intended for use or actually used as a residence, which generally

includes sleeping, bathroom, or kitchen facilities.

§ 614.4935 Escrow requirement.

If a System institution requires the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any

other charges for a loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is

made, increased, extended or renewed on or after October 4, 1996, the institution shall also

require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under § 614.4930.

The institution, or a servicer acting on behalf of the institution, shall deposit the flood insurance

premiums on behalf of the borrower in an escrow account. This escrow account will be subject to

escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures

Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA), which generally limits the amount that may be

maintained in escrow accounts for certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements

153

for those accounts, only if the loan is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice

from the Administrator of FEMA or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the

institution, or a servicer acting on behalf of the institution, shall pay the amount owed to the

insurance provider from the escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

§ 614.4940 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form.

(a) Use of form. A System institution shall use the standard flood hazard determination

form developed by the Administrator of FEMA when determining whether the building or

mobile home offered as collateral security for a loan is or will be located in a special flood

hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the 1968 Act. The standard flood hazard

determination form may be used in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner. A System

institution may obtain the standard flood hazard determination form from FEMA’s Web site at

www.fema.gov.

(b) Retention of form. A System institution shall retain a copy of the completed standard

flood hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic form, for the period of time

the System institution owns the loan.

§ 614.4945 Force placement of flood insurance.

(a) Notice and purchase of coverage. If a System institution, or a servicer acting on behalf

of the System institution, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan, that the

building or mobile home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered

by flood insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required

under § 614.4930, then the System institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall notify the

borrower that the borrower should obtain flood insurance, at the borrower’s expense, in an

amount at least equal to the amount required under § 614.4930, for the remaining term of the

154

loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood insurance within 45 days after notification, then the

System institution, or its servicer, shall purchase insurance on the borrower’s behalf. The

System institution, or its servicer, may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees

incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred for coverage

beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient

coverage amount.

(b) Termination of force-placed insurance.

(1) Termination and refund. Within 30 days of receipt by a System institution, or by a

servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of a borrower’s existing flood insurance coverage,

the System institution, or its servicer, shall:

(i) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the System

institution, or its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section; and

(ii) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance

purchased by the System institution, or by its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section during

any period during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage

purchased by the System institution, or its servicer, were each in effect, and any related fees

charged to the borrower with respect to the insurance purchased by the System institution, or its

servicer, during such period.

(2) Sufficiency of demonstration. For purposes of confirming a borrower’s existing flood

insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, a System institution, or a servicer acting

on its behalf, shall accept from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes

the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the

insurance company or agent.

155

§ 614.4950 Determination fees.

(a) General. Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other than the Flood Disaster

Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001 - 4129), any System institution, or a

servicer acting on behalf of the System institution, may charge a reasonable fee for determining

whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located or will be located in a special

flood hazard area. A determination fee may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-

loan monitoring.

(b) Borrower fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may

be charged to the borrower if the determination:

(1) Is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan

that is initiated by the borrower;

(2) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s revision or updating of flood plain areas or

flood-risk zones;

(3) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s publication of a notice or compendium that:

(i) Affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or

(ii) By determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a

determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood

hazard area; or

(4) Results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the lender, or its servicer, on

behalf of the borrower under § 614.4945.

(c) Purchaser or transferee fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this

section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or transfer

of the loan.

156

§ 614.4955 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief

assistance.

(a) Notice requirement. When a System institution makes, increases, extends, or renews a

loan secured by a building or a mobile home located or to be located in a special flood hazard

area, the System institution shall mail or deliver a written notice to the borrower and to the

servicer in all cases whether or not flood insurance is available under the 1968 Act for the

collateral securing the loan.

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available under the

NFIP and may also be available from private insurers; and

(4) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

(c) Timing of notice. The System institution shall provide the notice required by

paragraph (a) of this section to the borrower within a reasonable time before the completion of

the transaction, and to the servicer as promptly as practicable after the System institution

provides notice to the borrower and in any event no later than the time the System institution

provides other similar notices to the servicer concerning hazard insurance and taxes. Notice to

the servicer may be made electronically or may take the form of a copy of the notice to the

borrower.

157

(d) Record of receipt. The System institution shall retain a record of the receipt of the

notices by the borrower and the servicer for the period of time it owns the loan.

(e) Alternate method of notice. Instead of providing the notice to the borrower required

by paragraph (a) of this section, a System institution may obtain satisfactory written assurance

from a seller or lessor that, within a reasonable time before the completion of the sale or lease

transaction, the seller or lessor has provided such notice to the purchaser or lessee. The System

institution shall retain a record of the written assurance from the seller or lessor for the period of

time it owns the loan.

(f) Use of sample form of notice. A System institution will be considered to be in

compliance with the requirement for notice to the borrower of this section by providing written

notice to the borrower containing the language presented in appendix A to this subpart within a

reasonable time before the completion of the transaction. The notice presented in appendix A to

this subpart satisfies the borrower notice requirements of the 1968 Act.

§ 614.4960 Notice of servicer’s identity.

(a) Notice requirement. When a System institution makes, increases, extends, renews,

sells, or transfers a loan secured by a building or mobile home located or to be located in a

special flood hazard area, it shall notify the Administrator of FEMA (or the Administrator’s

designee) in writing of the identity of the servicer of the loan. The Administrator of FEMA has

designated the insurance provider to receive the System institution’s notice of the servicer’s

identity. This notice may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to

the Administrator of FEMA’s designee.

(b) Transfer of servicing rights. The System institution shall notify the Administrator of

FEMA (or the Administrator’s designee) of any change in the servicer of a loan described in

158

paragraph (a) of this section within 60 days after the effective date of the change. This notice

may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to the Administrator of

FEMA’s designee. Upon any change in the servicing of a loan described in paragraph (a) of this

section, the duty to provide notice under this paragraph (b) shall transfer to the transferee

servicer.

APPENDIX A TO SUBPART S OF PART 614—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that:

The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be located in an area with special flood hazards.

The area has been identified by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: ________. This area has at least a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Director of FEMA to

review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance also may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or

159

(2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the overall value of the property securing the loan minus the value of the land on which the property is located.

• Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community's participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

___ Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally-declared flood disaster.

11. Effective January 1, 2016, part 614 is amended by:

a. Revising § 614.4935 to read as follows:

§ 614.4935 Escrow requirement.

(a) In general.

(1) Applicability. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) or paragraph (c) of this section,

a System institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall require the escrow of all premiums

and fees for any flood insurance required under § 614.4930 for any designated loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed

on or after January 1, 2016, payable with the same frequency as payments on the designated loan

are required to be made for the duration of the loan.

(2) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section does not apply if:

(i) The loan is an extension of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural

purposes;

(ii) The loan is in a subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same residential

improved real estate or mobile home for which the borrower has obtained flood insurance

coverage that meets the requirements of § 614.4930;

160

(iii) Flood insurance coverage for the residential improved real estate or mobile home is

provided by a policy that:

(A) Meets the requirements of § 614.4930;

(B) Is provided by a condominium association, cooperative, homeowners association, or

other applicable group; and

(C) The premium for which is paid by the condominium association, cooperative,

homeowners association, or other applicable group as a common expense;

(iv) The loan is a home equity line of credit;

(v) The loan is a nonperforming loan, which is a loan that is 90 or more days past due and

remains nonperforming until it is permanently modified or until the entire amount past due,

including principal, accrued interest, and penalty interest incurred as the result of past due status,

is collected or otherwise discharged in full; or

(vi) The loan has a term of no longer than 12 months.

(3) Duration of exception. If a System institution, or a servicer acting its behalf,

determines at any time during the term of a designated loan secured by residential improved real

estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after January 1,

2016, that an exception under paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not apply, then the System

institution, or the servicer acting on its behalf, shall require the escrow of all premiums and fees

for any flood insurance required under § 614.4930 as soon as reasonably practicable and, if

applicable, shall provide any disclosure required under section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement

Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA).

(4) Escrow account. The System institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall

deposit the flood insurance premiums and fees on behalf of the borrower in an escrow account.

161

This escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section 10 of

RESPA, which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in escrow accounts for

certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements for those accounts, only if the loan

is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the Administrator of FEMA

or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the System institution, or a servicer

acting on its behalf, shall pay the amount owed to the insurance provider from the escrow

account by the date when such premiums are due.

(b) Notice. For any loan for which a System institution is required to escrow under

paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (c)(2) of this section or may be required to escrow under paragraph

(a)(3) of this section during the term of the loan, the System institution, or a servicer acting on its

behalf, shall mail or deliver a written notice with the notice provided under § 614.4955

informing the borrower that the System institution is required to escrow all premiums and fees

for required flood insurance, using language that is substantially similar to model clauses on the

escrow requirement in appendix A.

(c) Small lender exception.

(1) Qualification. Except as may be required under applicable State law, paragraphs (a),

(b), and (d) of this section do not apply to a System institution:

(i) That has total assets of less than $1 billion as of December 31 of either of the two

prior calendar years; and

(ii) On or before July 6, 2012:

(A) Was not required under Federal or State law to deposit taxes, insurance premiums,

fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire term of any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home; and

162

(B) Did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes,

insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for any loans secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home.

(2) Change in status. If a System institution previously qualified for the exception in

paragraph (c)(1) of this section, but no longer qualifies for the exception because it had assets of

$1 billion or more for two consecutive calendar year ends, the System institution must escrow

premiums and fees for flood insurance pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section for any

designated loan made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after July 1 of the first calendar

year of changed status.

(d) Option to escrow.

(1) In general. A System institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall offer and

make available to the borrower the option to escrow all premiums and fees for any flood

insurance required under § 614.4930 for any loan secured by residential improved real estate or a

mobile home that is outstanding on January 1, 2016, or July 1 of the first calendar year in which

the System institution has had a change in status pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section,

unless:

(i) The loan or the System institution qualifies for an exception from the escrow

requirement under paragraph (a)(2) or (c) of this section, respectively;

(ii) The borrower is already escrowing all premiums and fees for flood insurance for the

loan; or

(iii) The System institution is required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees

pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.

163

(2) Notice. For any loan subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the System institution, or

a servicer acting on its behalf, shall mail or deliver to the borrower no later than June 30, 2016,

or September 30 of the first calendar year in which the System institution has had a change in

status pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, a notice in writing, or if the borrower agrees,

electronically, informing the borrower of the option to escrow all premiums and fees for any

required flood insurance and the method(s) by which the borrower may request the escrow, using

language similar to the model clause in appendix B.

(3) Timing. The System institution, or the servicer acting on its behalf, must begin

escrowing premiums and fees for flood insurance as soon as reasonably practicable after the

System institution, or servicer, receives the borrower’s request to escrow.

b. Revising § 614.4955(b) to read as follows:

§ 614.4955 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief

assistance.

* * *

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available from private

insurance companies that issue standard flood insurance policies on behalf of the NFIP or

directly from the NFIP;

164

(4) A statement that flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a

standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP also may be available from a private insurance

company that issues policies on behalf of the company;

(5) A statement that the borrower is encouraged to compare the flood insurance coverage,

deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies

issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and

that the borrower should direct inquiries regarding the availability, cost, and comparisons of

flood insurance coverage to an insurance agent; and

(6) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

c. Revising Appendix A to read as follows:

APPENDIX A TO SUBPART S OF PART 614—SAMPLE FORM OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that: The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be

located in an area with special flood hazards. The area has been identified by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management

Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: __________. This area has a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Administrator of FEMA to

review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be

165

maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or (2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the building or mobile home and any

personal property that secures your loan and not the land itself. • Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be

available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community’s participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

• Although you may not be required to maintain flood insurance on all structures, you may

still wish to do so, and your mortgage lender may still require you to do so to protect the collateral securing the mortgage. If you choose not to maintain flood insurance on a structure and it floods, you are responsible for all flood losses relating to that structure.

Availability of Private Flood Insurance Coverage

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent

who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. You should compare the flood insurance coverage, deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and contact an insurance agent as to the availability, cost, and comparisons of flood insurance coverage.

[Escrow Requirement for Residential Loans

Federal law may require a lender or its servicer to escrow all premiums and fees for flood insurance that covers any residential building or mobile home securing a loan that is located in an area with special flood hazards. If your lender notifies you that an escrow account is required for your loan, then you must pay your flood insurance premiums and fees to the lender or its servicer with the same frequency as you make loan payments for the duration of your loan. These premiums and fees will be deposited in the escrow account, which will be used to pay the flood insurance provider.]

___Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as

166

containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally declared flood disaster.

d. Adding new Appendix B to read as follows:

APPENDIX B TO SUBPART S OF PART 614—SAMPLE CLAUSE FOR OPTION TO ESCROW FOR OUTSTANDING LOANS Escrow Option Clause

You have the option to escrow all premiums and fees for the payment on your flood insurance policy that covers any residential building or mobile home that is located in an area with special flood hazards and that secures your loan. If you choose this option:

• Your payments will be deposited in an escrow account to be paid to the flood insurance provider.

• The escrow amount for flood insurance will be added to the regular mortgage payment that you make to your lender or its servicer.

• The payments you make into the escrow account will accumulate over time and the funds will be used to pay your flood insurance policy when your lender or servicer receives a notice from your flood insurance provider that the flood insurance premium is due.

To choose this option, follow the instructions below. If you have any questions about the option, contact [Insert Name of Lender or Servicer] at [Insert Contact Information]. [Insert Instructions for Selecting to Escrow]

167

National Credit Union Administration

12 CFR CHAPTER VII

Authority and Issuance

For the reasons set forth in the joint preamble, the NCUA Board revises part 760 of

chapter VII of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations to read as follows:

PART 760—LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS

12. The authority citation for part 760 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757, 1789; 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a, 4104b, 4106, and 4128.

13. Effective October 1, 2015, part 760 is revised to read as follows: PART 760—LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS Sec. 760.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. 760.2 Definitions. 760.3 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available. 760.4 Exemptions. 760.5 Escrow requirement. 760.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form. 760.7 Force placement of flood insurance. 760.8 Determination fees. 760.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance. 760.10 Notice of servicer’s identity. Appendix A to Part 760—Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance § 760.1 Authority, purpose, and scope.

(a) Authority. This part is issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1757, 1789 and 42 U.S.C. 4012a,

4104a, 4104b, 4106, 4128.

(b) Purpose. The purpose of this part is to implement the requirements of the National

Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42

U.S.C. 4001-4129).

168

(c) Scope. This part, except for §§ 760.6 and 760.8, applies to loans secured by buildings

or mobile homes located or to be located in areas determined by the Administrator of the Federal

Emergency Management Agency to have special flood hazards. Sections 760.6 and 760.8 apply

to loans secured by buildings or mobile homes, regardless of location.

§ 760.2 Definitions.

(a) Act means the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-

4129).

(b) Administrator of FEMA means the Administrator of the Federal Emergency

Management Agency.

(c) Building means a walled and roofed structure, other than a gas or liquid storage tank,

that is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, and a walled and roofed

structure while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair.

(d) Community means a State or a political subdivision of a State that has zoning and

building code jurisdiction over a particular area having special flood hazards.

(e) Credit union means a Federal or State-chartered credit union that is insured by the

National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund.

(f) Designated loan means a loan secured by a building or mobile home that is located or

to be located in a special flood hazard area in which flood insurance is available under the Act.

(g) Mobile home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, that is built on

a permanent chassis and designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached

to the required utilities. The term mobile home does not include a recreational vehicle. For

purposes of this part, the term mobile home means a mobile home on a permanent foundation.

The term mobile home includes a manufactured home as that term is used in the NFIP.

169

(h) NFIP means the National Flood Insurance Program authorized under the Act.

(i) Residential improved real estate means real estate upon which a home or other

residential building is located or to be located.

(j) Servicer means the person responsible for:

(1) Receiving any scheduled, periodic payments from a borrower under the terms of a

loan, including amounts for taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges with respect to the

property securing the loan; and

(2) Making payments of principal and interest and any other payments from the amounts

received from the borrower as may be required under the terms of the loan.

(k) Special flood hazard area means the land in the flood plain within a community

having at least a one percent chance of flooding in any given year, as designated by the

Administrator of FEMA.

(l) Table funding means a settlement at which a loan is funded by a contemporaneous

advance of loan funds and an assignment of the loan to the person advancing the funds.

§ 760.3 Requirement to purchase flood insurance where available.

(a) In general. A credit union shall not make, increase, extend, or renew any designated

loan unless the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the loan is covered

by flood insurance for the term of the loan. The amount of insurance must be at least equal to the

lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the designated loan or the maximum limit of

coverage available for the particular type of property under the Act. Flood insurance coverage

under the Act is limited to the building or mobile home and any personal property that secures a

loan and not the land itself.

170

(b) Table funded loan. A credit union that acquires a loan from a mortgage broker or

other entity through table funding shall be considered to be making a loan for the purposes of

this part.

§ 760.4 Exemptions.

The flood insurance requirement prescribed by § 760.3 does not apply with respect to:

(a) Any State-owned property covered under a policy of self-insurance satisfactory to the

Administrator of FEMA, who publishes and periodically revises the list of States falling within

this exemption;

(b) Property securing any loan with an original principal balance of $5,000 or less and a

repayment term of one year or less; or

(c) Any structure that is a part of any residential property but is detached from the

primary residential structure of such property and does not serve as a residence. For purposes of

this paragraph (c):

(1) “a structure that is a part of a residential property” is a structure used primarily for

personal, family, or household purposes, and not used primarily for agricultural, commercial,

industrial, or other business purposes;

(2) a structure is “detached” from the primary residential structure if it is not joined by

any structural connection to that structure; and

(3) “serve as a residence” shall be based upon the good faith determination of the credit

union that the structure is intended for use or actually used as a residence, which generally

includes sleeping, bathroom, or kitchen facilities.

171

§ 760.5 Escrow requirement.

If a credit union requires the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums, fees, or any other

charges for a loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made,

increased, extended, or renewed on or after November 1, 1996, the credit union shall also require

the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under §760.3. The credit

union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit union, shall deposit the flood insurance

premiums on behalf of the borrower in an escrow account. This escrow account will be subject to

escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures

Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA), which generally limits the amount that may be

maintained in escrow accounts for certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements

for those accounts, only if the loan is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice

from the Administrator of FEMA or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the

credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit union, shall pay the amount owed to the

insurance provider from the escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

§ 760.6 Required use of standard flood hazard determination form.

(a) Use of form. A credit union shall use the standard flood hazard determination form

developed by the Administrator of FEMA when determining whether the building or mobile

home offered as collateral security for a loan is or will be located in a special flood hazard area

in which flood insurance is available under the Act. The standard flood hazard determination

form may be used in a printed, computerized, or electronic manner. A credit union may obtain

the standard flood hazard determination form from FEMA’s website at www.fema.gov.

172

(b) Retention of form. A credit union shall retain a copy of the completed standard flood

hazard determination form, in either hard copy or electronic form, for the period of time the

credit union owns the loan.

§ 760.7 Force placement of flood insurance.

(a) Notice and purchase of coverage. If a credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of

the credit union, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan, that the building or

mobile home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered by flood

insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required under

§ 760.3, then the credit union or its servicer shall notify the borrower that the borrower should

obtain flood insurance, at the borrower’s expense, in an amount at least equal to the amount

required under § 760.3, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood

insurance within 45 days after notification, then the credit union or its servicer shall purchase

insurance on the borrower’s behalf. The credit union or its servicer may charge the borrower for

the cost of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees

incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not

provide a sufficient coverage amount.

(b) Termination of force-placed insurance. (1) Termination and refund. Within 30 days

of receipt by a credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit union, of a confirmation

of a borrower’s existing flood insurance coverage, the credit union or its servicer shall:

(A) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the credit

union or its servicer under paragraph (a) of this section; and

(B) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance

purchased by the credit union or its servicer under paragraph (a) of this section during any period

173

during which the borrower’s flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage purchased by

the credit union or its servicer were each in effect, and any related fees charged to the borrower

with respect to the insurance purchased by the credit union or its servicer during such period.

(2) Sufficiency of demonstration. For purposes of confirming a borrower’s existing flood

insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, a credit union or its servicer shall accept

from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood

insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company

or agent.

§ 760.8 Determination fees.

(a) General. Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other than the Flood Disaster

Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4129), any credit union, or a servicer acting

on behalf of the credit union, may charge a reasonable fee for determining whether the building

or mobile home securing the loan is located or will be located in a special flood hazard area. A

determination fee may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-loan monitoring.

(b) Borrower fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may

be charged to the borrower if the determination:

(1) Is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan

that is initiated by the borrower;

(2) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s revision or updating of floodplain areas or

flood-risk zones;

(3) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA’s publication of a notice or compendium that:

(i) Affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or

174

(ii) By determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a

determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood

hazard area; or

(4) Results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the credit union or its servicer

on behalf of the borrower under § 760.7.

(c) Purchaser or transferee fee. The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this

section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or transfer

of the loan.

§ 760.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

(a) Notice requirement. When a credit union makes, increases, extends, or renews a loan

secured by a building or a mobile home located or to be located in a special flood hazard area,

the credit union shall mail or deliver a written notice to the borrower and to the servicer in all

cases whether or not flood insurance is available under the Act for the collateral securing the

loan.

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available under the

NFIP and may also be available from private insurers; and

(4) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally-declared disaster.

175

(c) Timing of notice. The credit union shall provide the notice required by paragraph (a)

of this section to the borrower within a reasonable time before the completion of the transaction,

and to the servicer as promptly as practicable after the credit union provides notice to the

borrower and in any event no later than the time the credit union provides other similar notices to

the servicer concerning hazard insurance and taxes. Notice to the servicer may be made

electronically or may take the form of a copy of the notice to the borrower.

(d) Record of receipt. The credit union shall retain a record of the receipt of the notices

by the borrower and the servicer for the period of time the credit union owns the loan.

(e) Alternate method of notice. Instead of providing the notice to the borrower required

by paragraph (a) of this section, a credit union may obtain satisfactory written assurance from a

seller or lessor that, within a reasonable time before the completion of the sale or lease

transaction, the seller or lessor has provided such notice to the purchaser or lessee. The credit

union shall retain a record of the written assurance from the seller or lessor for the period of time

the credit union owns the loan.

(f) Use of sample form of notice. A credit union will be considered to be in compliance

with the requirement for notice to the borrower of this section by providing written notice to the

borrower containing the language presented in appendix A to this part within a reasonable time

before the completion of the transaction. The notice presented in appendix A to this part satisfies

the borrower notice requirements of the Act.

§ 760.10 Notice of servicer’s identity.

(a) Notice requirement. When a credit union makes, increases, extends, renews, sells, or

transfers a loan secured by a building or mobile home located or to be located in a special flood

hazard area, the credit union shall notify the Administrator of FEMA (or the Administrator of

176

FEMA’s designee) in writing of the identity of the servicer of the loan. The Administrator of

FEMA has designated the insurance provider to receive the credit union’s notice of the servicer’s

identity. This notice may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to

the Administrator of FEMA’s designee.

(b) Transfer of servicing rights. The credit union shall notify the Administrator of FEMA

(or the Administrator of FEMA’s designee) of any change in the servicer of a loan described in

paragraph (a) of this section within 60 days after the effective date of the change. This notice

may be provided electronically if electronic transmission is satisfactory to the Administrator or

his or her designee. Upon any change in the servicing of a loan described in paragraph (a) of this

section, the duty to provide notice under this paragraph (b) shall transfer to the transferee

servicer.

Appendix A to Part 760—Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that:

The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be located in an area with special flood hazards.

The area has been identified by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: _______. This area has at least a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Director of FEMA to review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the

177

property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance also may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or

(2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the overall value of the property securing the loan minus the value of the land on which the property is located.

• Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community's participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

___ Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally-declared flood disaster.

14. Effective January 1, 2016, part 760 is amended by:

a. Revising § 760.5 to read as follows:

§ 760.5 Escrow requirement.

(a) In general. (1) Applicability. Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) or (c) of this

section, a credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit union, shall require the escrow

of all premiums and fees for any flood insurance required under § 760.3(a) for any designated

loan secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that is made, increased,

extended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2016, payable with the same frequency as payments

on the designated loan are required to be made for the duration of the loan.

(2) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section does not apply if:

178

(i) The loan is an extension of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural

purposes;

(ii) The loan is in a subordinate position to a senior lien secured by the same residential

improved real estate or mobile home for which the borrower has obtained flood insurance

coverage that meets the requirements of § 760.3(a);

(iii) Flood insurance coverage for the residential improved real estate or mobile home is

provided by a policy that:

(A) Meets the requirements of § 760.3(a);

(B) Is provided by a condominium association, cooperative, homeowners association, or

other applicable group; and

(C) The premium for which is paid by the condominium association, cooperative,

homeowners association, or other applicable group as a common expense;

(iv) The loan is a home equity line of credit;

(v) The loan is a nonperforming loan, which is a loan that is 90 or more days past due and

remains nonperforming until it is permanently modified or until the entire amount past due,

including principal, accrued interest, and penalty interest incurred as the result of past due status,

is collected or otherwise discharged in full; or

(vi) The loan has a term of not longer than 12 months.

(3) Duration of exception. If a credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit

union, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan secured by residential

improved real estate or a mobile home that is made, increased, extended, or renewed on or after

January 1, 2016, that an exception under paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not apply, then the

179

credit union or its servicer shall require the escrow of all premiums and fees for any flood

insurance required under § 760.3(a) as soon as reasonably practicable and, if applicable, shall

provide any disclosure required under section 10 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of

1974 (12 U.S.C. 2609) (RESPA).

(4) Escrow account. The credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit union,

shall deposit the flood insurance premiums and fees on behalf of the borrower in an escrow

account. This escrow account will be subject to escrow requirements adopted pursuant to section

10 of RESPA, which generally limits the amount that may be maintained in escrow accounts for

certain types of loans and requires escrow account statements for those accounts, only if the loan

is otherwise subject to RESPA. Following receipt of a notice from the Administrator of FEMA

or other provider of flood insurance that premiums are due, the credit union, or a servicer acting

on behalf of the credit union, shall pay the amount owed to the insurance provider from the

escrow account by the date when such premiums are due.

(b) Notice. For any loan for which a credit union is required to escrow under paragraph

(a) or paragraph (c)(2) of this section or may be required to escrow under paragraph (a)(3) of this

section during the term of the loan, the credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the credit

union, shall mail or deliver a written notice with the notice provided under § 760.9 informing the

borrower that the credit union is required to escrow all premiums and fees for required flood

insurance, using language that is substantially similar to model clauses on the escrow

requirement in appendix A.

(c) Small lender exception. (1) Qualification. Except as may be required under applicable

State law, paragraphs (a), (b) and (d) of this section do not apply to a credit union:

180

(i) That has total assets of less than $1 billion as of December 31 of either of the two

prior calendar years; and

(ii) On or before July 6, 2012:

(A) Was not required under Federal or State law to deposit taxes, insurance premiums,

fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for the entire term of any loan secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home; and

(B) Did not have a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the deposit of taxes,

insurance premiums, fees, or any other charges in an escrow account for any loans secured by

residential improved real estate or a mobile home.

(2) Change in status. If a credit union previously qualified for the exception in paragraph

(c)(1) of this section, but no longer qualifies for the exception because it had assets of $1 billion

or more for two consecutive calendar year ends, the credit union must escrow premiums and fees

for flood insurance pursuant to paragraph (a) for any designated loan made, increased, extended,

or renewed on or after July 1 of the first calendar year of changed status.

(d) Option to escrow. (1) In general. A credit union, or a servicer acting on behalf of the

credit union, shall offer and make available to the borrower the option to escrow all premiums

and fees for any flood insurance required under § 760.3 for any loan secured by residential

improved real estate or a mobile home that is outstanding on January 1, 2016, or July 1 of the

first calendar year in which the credit union has had a change in status pursuant to paragraph

(c)(2) of this section, unless:

(i) The credit union or the loan qualifies for an exception from the escrow requirement

under paragraphs (a)(2) or (c) of this section, respectively;

181

(ii) The borrower is already escrowing all premiums and fees for flood insurance for the

loan; or

(iii) The credit union is required to escrow flood insurance premiums and fees pursuant to

paragraph (a) of this section.

(2) Notice. For any loan subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the credit union, or a

servicer acting on behalf of the credit union, shall mail or deliver to the borrower no later than

June 30, 2016, or September 30 of the first calendar year in which the credit union has had a

change in status pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, a notice in writing, or if the

borrower agrees, electronically, informing the borrower of the option to escrow all premiums and

fees for any required flood insurance and the method(s) by which the borrower may request the

escrow, using language similar to the model clause in appendix B.

(3) Timing. The credit union or servicer must begin escrowing premiums and fees for

flood insurance as soon as reasonably practicable after the credit union or servicer receives the

borrower’s request to escrow.

b. Revising § 760.9(b) to read as follows:

§ 760.9 Notice of special flood hazards and availability of Federal disaster relief assistance.

* * * * *

(b) Contents of notice. The written notice must include the following information:

(1) A warning, in a form approved by the Administrator of FEMA, that the building or

the mobile home is or will be located in a special flood hazard area;

(2) A description of the flood insurance purchase requirements set forth in section 102(b)

of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b));

182

(3) A statement, where applicable, that flood insurance coverage is available from private

insurance companies that issue standard flood insurance policies on behalf of the NFIP or

directly from the NFIP;

(4) A statement that flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a

standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may also be available from a private insurance

company that issues policies on behalf of the company;

(5) A statement that the borrower is encouraged to compare the flood insurance coverage,

deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies

issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and

that the borrower should direct inquiries regarding the availability, cost, and comparisons of

flood insurance coverage to an insurance agent; and

(6) A statement whether Federal disaster relief assistance may be available in the event of

damage to the building or mobile home caused by flooding in a Federally declared disaster.

* * * * *

c. Revising Appendix A to Part 760, Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards

and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance, to read as follows: Appendix A to Part 760—Sample Form of Notice of Special Flood Hazards and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance

We are giving you this notice to inform you that:

The building or mobile home securing the loan for which you have applied is or will be located in an area with special flood hazards.

The area has been identified by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a special flood hazard area using FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map or the Flood Hazard Boundary Map for the following community: _______. This area has a one percent (1%) chance of a flood equal to or exceeding the base flood elevation (a 100-year flood) in any given year. During the life of a 30-year mortgage loan, the risk of a 100-year flood in a special flood hazard area is 26 percent (26%).

183

Federal law allows a lender and borrower jointly to request the Administrator of FEMA

to review the determination of whether the property securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area. If you would like to make such a request, please contact us for further information.

___ The community in which the property securing the loan is located participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Federal law will not allow us to make you the loan that you have applied for if you do not purchase flood insurance. The flood insurance must be maintained for the life of the loan. If you fail to purchase or renew flood insurance on the property, Federal law authorizes and requires us to purchase the flood insurance for you at your expense.

• At a minimum, flood insurance purchased must cover the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the loan; or

(2) the maximum amount of coverage allowed for the type of property under the NFIP.

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is limited to the building or mobile home and any personal property that secures your loan and not the land itself.

• Federal disaster relief assistance (usually in the form of a low-interest loan) may be

available for damages incurred in excess of your flood insurance if your community’s participation in the NFIP is in accordance with NFIP requirements.

• Although you may not be required to maintain flood insurance on all structures, you

may still wish to do so, and your mortgage lender may still require you to do so to protect the collateral securing the mortgage. If you choose not to maintain flood insurance on a structure and it floods, you are responsible for all flood losses relating to that structure.

Availability of Private Flood Insurance Coverage

Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP may be purchased through an insurance agent

who will obtain the policy either directly through the NFIP or through an insurance company that participates in the NFIP. Flood insurance that provides the same level of coverage as a standard flood insurance policy under the NFIP may be available from private insurers that do not participate in the NFIP. You should compare the flood insurance coverage, deductibles, exclusions, conditions, and premiums associated with flood insurance policies issued on behalf of the NFIP and policies issued on behalf of private insurance companies and contact an insurance agent as to the availability, cost, and comparisons of flood insurance coverage.

[Escrow Requirement for Residential Loans

Federal law may require a lender or its servicer to escrow all premiums and fees for flood

insurance that covers any residential building or mobile home securing a loan that is located in an area with special flood hazards. If your lender notifies you that an escrow account is required

184

for your loan, then you must pay your flood insurance premiums and fees to the lender or its servicer with the same frequency as you make loan payments for the duration of your loan. These premiums and fees will be deposited in the escrow account, which will be used to pay the flood insurance provider.]

___ Flood insurance coverage under the NFIP is not available for the property securing the loan because the community in which the property is located does not participate in the NFIP. In addition, if the non-participating community has been identified for at least one year as containing a special flood hazard area, properties located in the community will not be eligible for Federal disaster relief assistance in the event of a Federally declared flood disaster.

d. Adding Appendix B to Part 760, Sample Clause for Option to Escrow for Outstanding Loans, to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 760—Sample Clause for Option to Escrow for Outstanding Loans Escrow Option Clause You have the option to escrow all premiums and fees for the payment on your flood insurance policy that covers any residential building or mobile home that is located in an area with special flood hazards and that secures your loan. If you choose this option:

• Your payments will be deposited in an escrow account to be paid to the flood insurance provider.

• The escrow amount for flood insurance will be added to the regular mortgage payment that you make to your lender or its servicer.

• The payments you make into the escrow account will accumulate over time and the funds will be used to pay your flood insurance policy when your lender or servicer receives a notice from your flood insurance provider that the flood insurance premium is due.

To choose this option, follow the instructions below. If you have any questions about the option, contact [Insert Name of Lender or Servicer] at [Insert Contact Information]. [Insert Instructions for Selecting to Escrow]

185

[THIS SIGNATURE PAGE RELATES TO THE JOINT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ENTITLED “LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS”] Date: ____________________________ Thomas J. Curry Comptroller of the Currency

186

[THIS SIGNATURE PAGE RELATES TO THE JOINT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ENTITLED “LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS”] By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, _______, 2015. ____________________________ Robert deV. Frierson Secretary of the Board.

187

[THIS SIGNATURE PAGE RELATES TO THE JOINT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ENTITLED “LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS”]

By order of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

____________________________ Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary Dated at Washington, D.C., this ___ day of ____________, 2015.

188

[THIS SIGNATURE PAGE RELATES TO THE JOINT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ENTITLED “LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS”] By order of the Board of the Farm Credit Administration. ____________________________ Dale L. Aultman Secretary Dated at McLean, VA, this ___ day of ____________, 2015.

189

[THIS SIGNATURE PAGE RELATES TO THE JOINT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ENTITLED “LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS”] By order of the Board of the National Credit Union Administration. ____________________________ Gerard Poliquin Secretary of the Board Dated at Alexandria, VA, this ___ day of ____________, 2015.

190

BILLING CODES: 4810-33-P; 6210-01-P; 6714-01-P; 6705-01-P; 7535-01-U