Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Density Functional
Theory Simulations
in Polymer Research
Jan Andzelm
Macromolecular Science & Technology Branch
Materials & Manufacturing Science Division
Weapons & Materials Directorate
Army Research Laboratory
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
2012 Army Research Office Workshop
Dispersion Interactions and
Density Functional Theory
at Delaware University
Tissue Surrogates / Ballistic Testing
Why Polymers?
• “Polymers arguably represent the most important class of
materials today; their multiple and tunable attributes underpin
expanding use across most advanced technology platforms.”
– Quoting from the report of a recent polymers workshop hosted by NSF and
cosponsored by AFOSR, ARO, ONR, DOE, NASA, NIH, NIST and
Macromolecules (2009) 42(2) 465
• Polymers are pervasive in military systems
Soldier Protection Flexible
Sensors
Membranes,
filtration,
decontamination
Flexible
armor
Engineered
Multifunctional
Fabrics
Armor / structure
Coatings
Tough, durable,
soft “body” Controllable
adhesion
Soft actuators,
“artificial muscles”
Integrated soft
sensors
electronics
Robotics
Vehicles Electronics,
Power ,
Energy
Device Encapsulation
1 mm
Technical Challenges in Multiscale Modeling of Polymers
Figure, courtesy of K.Kremer
• Need to span vast length and time scales
• Need for variety of methods, appropriate for
various scales
Desig
n
Unders
tandin
g
Challenges in Modeling of
Macromolecules:
Energy vs. Entropy
Chemistry vs. Chain Dynamics
Entanglements, Networks
Self-assembly, crystallization
Strain hardening, crazing, fracture
Glassy vs. Rubbery, Tg
MACRO
MESO/
MICRO
P
Instron
How the multiscale modeling of
polymers works?
Ψ2
Atoms:
Oxygen
Carbon
Ψ
Interaction: SO3H - H2O
Hydrogen
1 nm 1 μm meters distance
1 ns 1s hours time
Electrons Atoms Grains Slip-link Fields Finite-
Elements
Molecular
builder
Experiment: • Molecular formula
Experiment: • Length, Connectivity & architecture
of polymer
Monte
Carlo
Multiscale input:
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1974, Paul J. Flory
No. Entanglements
Multiscale flow of data:
Force-field
Structure,
Forces
Solubility ~
interactions
Water dimer interaction components
Exchange
Electrostatic
3-rd order
Total
Dispersion
Induction
E.M. Mas, K. Szalewicz, R. Bukowski, and B. Jeziorski JCP 107, 4207 (1998).
Intermolecular interactions
in polymers
Soldier protective clothing sulfonated styrene with water and hydronium ion
Water and DFP interaction with hydroxyl and amine groups
Tissue surrogates Non-aqueous Gels; hydrocarbons
Polyurethane urea (PUU) Optimization of hydrogen bonding in hard segments
Why epoxy with lower number of cross-links may be stronger?
Equation of states Role of dispersion forces
NLO properties of chromophores DFT good for excited states and interactions
Passivation of semiconductor surfaces DFT Band structure
Protective Clothing for Soldiers
Block Copolymer as a candidate for
permeable membrane:
sulfonated S-SIBS
Polyisobutylene (IB)
Polystyrene (PS)
Sulfonated styrene Our publications:
DTRA Conference, 2009, 2010
Int. J. Multiscale Comp. Engineering, 5, 3, 2007
Mol. Simulations, 32, 163, 2006
Force Field
Development
Multiscale modeling of Permeable Membranes
Interaction of
Segments, χ
Density of
Segments
Chemical reactions, spectroscopy
Structure, Density, Diffusion
Morphology
Permeability
Mechanical p.
Tools:
Density Functional Theory
Monte Carlo & Molecular Dynamics
Dynamic Density Functional Method
Finite Element Analysis
QSAR
length
tim
e
QM
MD
MESO
MACRO
Selecting and Validating force-field
SO3H or SO3-
What is the model of a dry membrane
How many water molecules are needed to support SO3-
Chemical reactions of water
and sulfonate groups
Spontaneous dissociation
of proton (from SO3H)
occurs in the presence of
minimum three water
molecules.
The hydrogen bonds with
oxygens of the sulfonate
group are formed.
If there are less than 3 waters
present, hydronium ion
spontaneously looses
proton to sulfonate anion!
Four water
molecules (or
more) allow
for hydronium
ion to drift
away from a
sulfonate
group
Water clusters stabilized
by hydrogen bonds
interact with sulfonate
anion with energy about
120 kcal/mol
Dry S-SIBS may contain
3 waters/sulfonate (SO3- )
Use SO3- Not SO3H in MD simulations !
Hydrogen bonding in models of polymer
monomers and water: QM Study
Amine interacts with water more strongly than Hydroxyl
Hydrogen bonding (kcal/mol)
Amine-Water Hydroxyl-Water Water-water
M05/631G**/gas phase -7.6 (-3.1) -6.1 (-5.2) -5.8
M05/6-311++G**/water -5.1 (-1.1) -3.3 (-2.6) -3.4
-5.1 kcal/mol -3.3
-1.1 kcal/mol -2.6
1.89Å 1.84Å
water
gas
First step of DFP hydrolysis reaction
First (most important) step of DFP hydrolysis: insertion of DFP and attaching H to O=P to form HO-P
J.B. Wright, W.E. White, J. Mol Structure, 454 (1998) 259; J.B. Wright et al, ECBC/TR-434 (2005),
J. Andzelm, J. Walker, H. Gibson, DTRA (2010)
Barriers (kcal/mol)
for direct insertion:
NH2 (34.9)
or
H2O (33.5 & 32.1) (J.B. Wright et al.)
Method: DMol3/PBE/DNP/Cosmo(water)/LSTQST,NEB
Concerted reaction involving NH2 and H2O (Energy barrier: 26.8 kcal/mol)
Stabilization of TS by
hydrogen bonds and NH3+
Concerted insertion of
water into DFP, in the
presence of amine is a
preferable pathway
This conformation
is more stable by 4.1 kcal/mol
QM/MM Minimum Free Energy Path (QM/MM-MFEP) !
Comparison of ARL Gels & Bio-Tissue
Pig Brain Synthetic Gel
Similar mechanical response
Synthetic
Gel
Pig Brain
Socrate (MIT/ISN)
• Demonstrated potential to exploit entanglements to
mimic bio-tissue response
• “Match” to pig brain, rat heart (up to ~ 20 s-1)
• Need stronger frequency dependence to capture
higher rates (softer - low rates / stiffer - high rates)
• Coupling entangled dangling ends in network with
solvent molecular weight
projectile
Damage path
Tissue surrogates Robotics
Soft actuators, soft sensors,
durable soft “body”
Coarse-grained simulations
Morphology of
Block copolymer
Strain hardening
due to
entanglements
Branched Polymers Entangled
Our publications:
Building and equilibrating polymer melts with
entangled, branched polymers
Chem. Phys. Lett., 523,139 (2012)
Extending DPD to study mechanical deformations
J. Chem. Phys., 136, 134903 (2012)
J. Pol. Science B: Pol. Physics, 50, 1694 (2012)
Calculating mechanics of polymer networks, blends
and copolymers
Macromolecules, in review
J. Pol. Science B: Pol. Physics, 48, 15 (2010)
Morphology of copolymers
Soft Matter, 7, 7539 (2011)
J. Pol. Science B: Pol. Physics, 49, 1479 (2011)
Langmuir, 27, 7836 (2011)
State of the art in
semiempirical force-fields (MEDEA)
Mean absolute errors 0.23% and 0.28% for n-alkane densities and heats of vaporization of n-alkanes at 298 K
C5H12
Method kcal/mol
COMPASS -2.44
M06-2X/6-311++G** -2.38
M06-2X/6-311G** -2.39
M05-2X/6-311++G** -1.87
BLYP/6-311G** -0.03
PBE1PBE/6-311G** -0.43
CAM-B3LYP/6-311G** -0.13
B97D/6-311G** -2.74
SVWN5/6-311G** -3.83
PBEPBE/6-311G** -0.58
Polymeric materials at high strain rates
• PMMA (Plexiglas): Transparent glassy polymer
• Moderate strength and ductility under typical loading conditions
• At high rate loading (15,000 in/s) PMMA transforms into a high-strength-to-density material with a brittle-like nature. The strength-to-density ratio is in excess of high strength steels and titanium alloy
• Fractured cone is generated at the strike point of a high-speed projectile. The cone impedes the projectile’s progress.
increasing
rate
strain
str
ess
“The Fascinating Behaviors of Ordinary Materials under Dynamic Conditions
Emerging Class of Materials for Armor and Blast Protection” (AMMTIAC, 2009)
Shaped
charge jet
<30,000 ft/s
for 10-30 ns
Hertzian
fracture
“Highly nonlinear behavior
of the nano-time materials,
stress wave propagation
may have to be considered
at a very small
molecular unit level.”
Bullet trapped in
Polyurea (PU) coating
Sealed/Healed area
after transit of bullet
• PU: rubbery material
• At high rate of loading and confinement, PU exhibits multi-fold increase in yield and modulus while retaining high elongation properties.
• At extremely high rate, the polymer can flow , healing the bullet hole
Resistance to rupture from different-thickness polyurea coated steel panels
Why Poly(urethane urea)s ?
4,4’-dicyclohexylmethane
diisocyanate Poly(tetramethylene
oxide) Phase
Mixed
Microphase
Separated
Complex Morphology
(S)oft (H)ard
aromatic or aliphatic?
Binding Energy between the hard segments, Compare aromatic with aliphatic version !
Reasons aliphatic instead of aromatic diisocyanate goups are used:
The motivation for using HMDI includes its ultra-violet (UV) radiation stability characteristic desired for
long-term outdoor durability performance, and additionally to explore potential energy dissipation as
result of the deformation associated with the “boat-chair-boat” conformation in HMDI.
QM results (DFT M05 )
Monodentate
urethane-urethane
linkages
Bidentate
urea-urea
linkages
Bidentate
urea-urethane
linkages
Types of hydrogen bonding in
segmented poly(urethane urea)
-10.3
(weakest)
-14.2
(strongest)
-13.0
(intermediate)
Hydrogen bonding in PUU T.L Chantawansri, Y.R. Sliozberg, J.W. Andzelm, A.J. Hsieh,
Polymer, 53(20), 4512 (2012)
aromatic or aliphatic?
DFT Optimization of hard segments of PUU
Lower binding energy
by ~4 kcal/mol
M062X/6-31G** OPT
Conformational search
from over 50 replicas
Aliphatic > aromatic
Flexible chains win!
PS
PC
Glassy polymers are present in e.g.
transparent armor or structural polymer
fibers.
Capability to predict a response of
polymer to external pressure as shown in EOS
critically impacts design of polymers for armor
applications.
dynamics (MD) with LAMMPS program using
~104 atoms models and DFT with CP2K
program using ~103 atoms were used
These results are being used to develop
constitutive models for macroscale simulations
PMMA can defeat shaped
charge jet transforming into
material stronger than steel
PMMA Polymers under isotropic
compression contract and begin to
fracture at P > 30 GPa
Polymer chains under pressure form
strong bonds and become 3D-solids
Fracture of polymers with rings and
semicrystalline is difficult to model with
MD or DFT
We can model fracture of PMMA
polymer, important for transparent armor,
up to 80GPa!
Hugoniot Equation of States (EOS)
for glassy polymers
Amorphous
Atomistic
Models;
MD annealing
DFT with CP2K
DFT Functional ?
Orbital Basis Set ?
Plane wave cutoff ?
NVT, NPT protocol ?
Restricted vs. Unrestricted DFT ?
MS step size ?
System size (KPoints)?
Testing density of PS
BLYP or PBE with DCACP, or Grimme, never GGA
DZVP/DZV is good; TZVP/DZVP not necessary
Plane Wave cutoff 300 Ry
Restricted DFT, MD step 0.5 fs
No KPoints
10
12
14
16
1 501 1001 1501 2001
500
600
700
800
1 501 1001 1501 2001 -1607.6
-1607.4
-1607.2
-1607 1 501 1001 1501 2001
Issues:
o Time of simulations 4ps
o Number of replicas
o Chain length of 4 monomers each
o Unit cell size, up to 1500 atoms
Energy Temperature Pressure
Sensitivity of Hugoniot Calculation
Failure of Grimme model
Property/polymer 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7
density P(Gpa)
PE a exp 0.85
DCACP 0.82 0.3 1.9 5.5
Grimme 0.89 1.2 4.8 10.8
PEc exp 1.01
DCACP 1.06 5.0 9.5 19.7
Grimme 1.05 6.7
PS exp 1.05
DCACP 1.02 1.0 2.5 7.3
Grimme 1.05 1.3 6.2
PMMA exp 1.18
DCACP 1.08 0.1 2.1 6.2
Grimme 1.17 2.1 6.9 16.2
UNCLASSIFIED
PS PC
Hugoniot Curves
PMMA
PS PMMA
Failure for polymers with rings at 25 Gpa
Accuracy of ReaxFF depends on polymer type
DFT seems to be very good
for PMMA
Andzelm, Chantawansri, Sirk, Byrd, Rice, DYFP 2012, Chem. Phys, 137, 204901, (2012)
0
4
0 2 4 6
0
4
0 2 4 6
0
4
0 2 4 6
CH
CO
OH
Fracture in PMMA
T(K): 3356 1994 816 451 352
RDF
0 Gpa
76 GPa
Optical properties of Peg-Phthalocyanine
Need to calculate excited states:
Color: singlet-singlet
Laser: triplet-triplet
Spectra do not depend on the conformation
and the size of PEG polymer
B and RSA bands: B3LYP/6311G**
Q band: ZINDO(10)/INDO2//DFT
Method\Excited state Q B R
Experiment 677 354 495
DFT:B3LYP/6311G* 637 338 487
ZINDO(10)//DFT 671 317
0
1
400 500 600 700
H → L
H → L+1 H-9 → L (β)
H → L+5 (α)
Mechanism of
UV-Vis and RSA
excitations
Andzelm, Rawlett, Orlicki, Snyder, Baldridge, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3 (2007) 870
Results for conformations of SiPC-PEG (x=75,250) complexes
System\Excited state Q B R
DFT
1 SiPC-PEG75 633(0.37) 335(0.54) 479(0.31)
2 SiPC-PEG75 633(0.36) 337(0.68) 477(0.22)
1 SiPC-PEG250 631(0.35) 337(0.47) 485(0.25)
2 SiPC-PEG250 631(0.34) 338(0.42) 500(0.18)
Solvent red-shifts spectra by ~20nm
Color of Peg-Phthalocyanine different
than green is due to structure defects
0
1
400 500 600 700
0
1
400 500 600 700
0
1
400 500 600 700
0
1
400 500 600 700
0
1
400 500 600 700
0
1
400 500 600 700
Color green is predicted
Design of Optimal Chromophores
Push-Pull chromophores should have
large NLO (hyperpolarizability, β) and transparency in visible
Conjugated bridge
Donor Acceptor
Challenge to consider atomistic scale:
Two chromophores differ
only in conformations, but β
is vastly different, by 80%
Push-pull chromophore:
Challenge to address dilemma:
Chromophores NLO Transparency
Large high poor
Small low good
Tasks for computations:
• Calculate accurately color (transparency)
• Efficient search at atomistic scale for chromophores with the large β
Specific Army Need: Chromophores
that do not absorb yellow light
n
)(1
)(11
rerfcr
rerfrr
Electron Repulsion = Long-range + Short-range
= Attenuation parameter
Long-range Exact exchange
Short-range Traditional DFT
BNL = DFT-LC approach
Long-range Corrected (LC) Functionals
Baer, Neuhauser, Livshits (BNL); Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 043002
Savin (1996).
Ikura, Tsuneda, Yanai, Hirao (2001)
Yanai, Tew, Handy (2004)
Henderson, Izmaylov, Scuseria, Savin, J. Chem. Phys. 127 (2007) 221103
Jacquemin et al., J.Chem. Theory, Comput, 4 (2008) 123
DFT-LC: BNL cancels SIC at the long range
)(|)|,(|)|,( nwnnnn x
lyp
cc
)()()( nnn cxxc
2
3)1)(2(1
12
2)(
2
1
22 qf
x eqq
erfq
qk
n
Density
fkq
Local Fermi vector
0 DFT-like; HF-like
w, Optimized for thermochemistry of G2
Savin term:
Andzelm, Rinderspacher, Rawlett, Dougherty, Baer, Govind, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5 (2009) 2835
NWChem: BNL Implementation
2-Electron Integrals
Long-range Correction
- Dependent Exchange Full Coulomb (no attenuation)
Attenuated 4-center integrals Dunlap Charge Density Fitting
( 3-center integrals)
)(1
)(11
rerfcr
rerfrr
• NWChem is part of the Molecular Science Software Suite, developed at Environmental
Molecular Sciences Laboratory, a DOE BER user facility, located at PNNL
• Designed and developed to be a highly efficient and portable Massively Parallel
computational chemistry package
• Provides computational chemistry solutions that are scalable with respect to chemical
system size as well as MPP hardware size
Linear response TDDFT in Tamm-Dancoff approximation: AX = ωX
COSMO solvation model
Scales well up to 128 processors
(not dedicated run)
twist ΔE Beta λmax
kcal/mol 10-30 esu nm
exp: 24 380
0 0 106 384
30 0.3 93 381
45 0.7 78 378
60 1.1 58 373
75 1.4 42 300
90 1.5 34 302
HOMO → LUMO
(charge transfer)
380 nm
HOMO-1 → LUMO
HOMO → LUMO+1
π→π*
263 nm
HOMO-1 LUMO+1
Effect of rotation
Free rotation along two single bonds
Rotomers lower λmax, μ and β
CT
π
Effect of association
Failure of
standard DFT for
intermolecular
intractions
Stacking effect:
μ and β → 0
λmax unchanged
Rotation and association of tolanes
MP2,M05
B3LYP
UNCLASSIFIED
H-bonded self-assembly of tolanes
Amido-ester H-bonding in tolanes leads to ~planar structures with
high-rotation barrier, good hyperpolarizability and excellent neutral colorimetry
H-bonds inTolane: Synthesis of New EO-chromophore inspired by Inverse design
OMe
N
NO2
OMe
O
H
Me
O
HN
O
Me
NO2
I
OMe
OMe
O+ DIPA, CuBr, PPh3
Pd(OAc)2, THFReflux
• Complex synthesis with
Pd catalyst
• Experimental UV-Vis
absorption peak at 377 nm
• Hydrogen bond results in
planar structure and
increased “push-pull” effect.
• NMR evidence of
Hydrogen bond (amide
proton heavily deshielded)
Experiment fully confirms computational conformational analysis:
dE: 0.0 4.6 11.1 19.3 UV: 370(0.94),310(0.20) 372(0.89), 309(0.16) 359(0.86),307(0.26) 351(0.68), 310(0.19)
dE: difference in energy (kcal/mol) UV: spectrum in nm (oscillator strength)
Lowest energy
conformer; planar
with the main UV-Vis
peak at 370 nm vs.
377 experiment
377
nm
θ
UNCLASSIFIED
Passivation of Semiconductor surfaces
Ga2O3(100)
Semiconductor oxide
polymer
DFT for optical and transport properties
• transparent armor, NLO-materials
• band gaps, I-V curves
• electron transport
UNCLASSIFIED
Summary
Accurate dispersion forces are necessary for structures of
polymer fragments
Dispersion is vital to study Soldier’s protective clothing,
personnel armor certification
Dispersion may not be essential to study ballistic impact at
compression, but it is necessary for tension
Hydrogen bonding is critically important for structural and
protective polymer materials
“Multifunctional” DFT is needed: good for excited states, band
gaps, optical properties and also for structures
Validation tests should include internal hydrogen bonds and
multiple hydrogen bonds
We need a big DFT (order N) with energy, gradients for at
least 50K atoms