1 \

, .

Parchment, Printing, and Hypermedia Communicatioll ill World Order Trallsformation

Ronald J. Deibert

l

:~t. t,~

:1

•SEP 1 9"999

~

PROPERTY OF RYERSON POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY 350 ViCTORIA ST., TORONTO. ONT. M5B 2K3

COL II \t B 1.\ lI:-> I \" E R SIT Y PRE S S :-I E W Y () R K

Columbia Univcrsity Prcss

Publishers Since 1893

New York, Chichester, West Sussex

Copyright Cl 1997 Cohnnhia Univcrsily Press

All rights reserved

Photo Credits:

Figure 3, page 172. conrtesy of Aeriallmagcs, Inc,

Figurc 5, pagc 190. courlcsy of Visual Artisls allll Gallcrics AWlcialion, Inc.

l.ihrary of Congrcss Calaloging-in-Puhlication Data

Dcihcrt. Ronald J, Parchmcnt. prinlin~. amI hypcrmcdia : commnnication in world ordcr lramformalinn

Ronald I. Deibert

p. cll1 - (Ncw dircctions in world polilics)

lnclndcs bibliographical refcrcnccs and index

ISBN: 0-231-10712-9Icl: alk. paper)

0-231-107n-7Iphk,)

I. COllnnnnication - Tcchnological inno\'alion< - Hislory

2, Civilization - I liston',

'- Comnlllnicalion and cnltmc - Hislory.

P%.T42 D45 1998 302.2 - 21 97·015336

'X: CII'

CaschoulH! cditions of Colnmbia Universi~' Prcss books arc printcd on pcrlllancnt amI

"mahle acid-frcc paper.

Printcd in Ihe Unitcd Slalcs of Amcrica

cl0987654321

p 109 8765 4 3 2 I

NE\\' DIRECTIONS IN WORLD POLITICS

'0/111 Gerard HlIggie. Gelleral Editor

John Cerard Ruggie. editor, The Antinomies of Interdependence: National Wel(cl " and the Intematiollal Di\'i,~ion of I,,1Imr 19K 3

Da\id B, Yoffie. POIrer and PmtectiorlislII: Strategies of the New!.1' Illdl/.~triali;:ij ~ COIllltril's JlJS 3

Paul '1;1\ lor. The l,i1llits of European Illtegratir)// IlJlB

\\'illial1l I I. Beckcr amI Sal1luel F. \\'ells, Jr., editors, Economics alld World POlI'l

,\11 A~,~e.mne"t of "I1Ieril'lln Dil,/omacy Sillce 17R!) 19K 3

John Ra\l.'nhill, Co/lel'/;"e Clienteli.ml: The Imile Cr)//I'entirms and North-South Ii lations 191);-

Rohert Pollard, EcrJIwmic Seellrih' and tire OrigillS of the Cold \\;i" IlJK5

\\'illiam ;\1cJ'\eil, American ,\lolle)' alld the Weimar Republic 191)6 Rohert 0, Keohane, etlilor. Neorca!ism alld Its (;ritic,~ I\)!\()

J, .\nn Tickner. Self·Re/iallce \hsus Power Po/itic,~: The American and Illdian Exp, ~

riellces ill Hllilding !':otion States 191)7

Rohert \\', CO'I:. Proelue/irJ/l. Power, and World Order: ~'ocicill'()Tces in tire l\1akinfj , I His/on' 19K','"

Jdfrc\' II<lrrod, POll'cr. Prodlle/ir)//, and the [Inproteded \Vorker 19K7

Da\id R. :'vlares. Pelletrating Intematiollol Markets: Theoretical Considerations </1; :

\lexicC/lI Agriclll/Ilre 191)7

John :\, C. C01l\heare. Trade Wars: 'l1le Theor)' and Practice of Intematir!11al CO" men'ial Rim/n' 19K7

Kenneth A Rodman. Sane/it)' \'ersIlS Sovereignt),: U.s, Polic), Toward the Natir!11a: i:::atioll of A'atural Resource Imestmellts in the Third World \988

Constance C. Anthony. 1\lechani:::atioll and Maize: Agriculture and the Politics, Technology Tran~fer in East Africa 1988

Joe k :\. Finla\"Son and l\ lark \\'. Zacher, II lanaging In tematirJIwl Markets: Developill COlllltries alld the Comlllodity Trade Regime 1988

Pcler i\l. Ilaas. Saring the MediterrallecII/: 'lhe Politics o(1nteTilatir!1101 Envirolllnell/,./ Cooperat irm 1990

Stephen C. Neff, Friellds But No Allies: Economic Liberalism and the Law ofNatirJ/l1 1990

Emanuel Adler and Be\'erh Crawford. Progress ill Poshl'ar International Relations 1991

J. ,~\nn Tickner. Gellder in Illtematiollal Relations: Feminist Perspecti,'es on Achieving Global Sewrit)' 1992

PROPERTY OF ~,~ RYERSON POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY

350 VIC10RIA 51., TORONTO. ONT. M5B 2K3

john Gerard Ruggie, editor, Multilateralislll Matters: TIre Tlreory and Praxis of an

'IIStitlltion,,1 Fonll 199~

R;my BlIZan, Charles jones, and Richard Little, Tire Logic of Anarel,)': Neorealism to Strul'lllwl f{eali~'m 199~

Ronnie n, l.ipsdllltl. and Ken Conca, editors, Tire State and Social POIfer in Global £nl'irOlllllelltal Politics 1993

J);l\id A. Haldwill, editor, NeorecJ1ism and Neo/iheralism: TI,e Contemporary' Dehate 199~

1(;IlCIl Litfill, O;:one Discollrses: Sciellce cHId l'o/itics ill G/ohal Enrironmental Co·

o/,a"tioll 1994 Ronnie 0, Lipschutz, editor, On Security 1995 Peter j, Kat7enskin, editor, The Cllltllre of NcltiOlwl Secllnt)': Nonlls Cllld 'dentit)· in

\\'orld Politics 1966 Edward 0, rvlansfield and Iiden V. l\filner, editors, Tire Political Economy of Ik

giollcJ1ism 1997 Robert Latham, !\fodemi!)', Securil)', alld tire !\faking of Postwar International Order

1997

Contents

PROPERTY OF RYERSON POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY 350 VICTORIA ST., TORONTO, ONT. M5B 2K3

Preface IX

111troductiol/

I. ~ lediulll Theory, Ecological Holism, and the Study of World

Order Transformation '7

Part 1. Printing and the Medieval to Modern World Order Transformation

2. From the Parchment Codex to the Printing Press: The Sacred

Word and the Rise and Fall of r-..ledieval Theocracy 47

3· Print and the r-..ledie\·al to r-..lodern World Order Transformation:

Distribntional Changes 67

Print and the r-..Icdievalto Modern World Order Transformation:

Changes to Social Epistemology 94 4­

Part 2. Hypermedia and the Modern to Postmodern World Order Transformation

). Transformation in the r-..lode of Communication: The Emergence

of the H~'pennedia Environment 113

viII CONIENIS

6'lI-!iR~rmediaand the Modern to Postmodern World Order

~formation: Distributional Changes 137

Hyp'tmnedia and the Modern to Postmodern World Ordcr ,V"I> PI <

,'t~~sformation: Changes to Social EpistenlOlogr 177

.8/ Conclusion 202

~otes 219

Bibliography 285

Index 315

Preface

The main contcntion of this hook is that the landscape ( world politics is undergoing rapid and fundamental transformations relate to the alkcnt of digital-electronic tclcconnnunications _ what I call the h, permedia em'iromnent - and that the most useful way to fathom thcse tran formations is through the lens of "medium theory." Admittcdly, the picllll that emcrges through this JCIlS \\'ill bc discomforting to m<1ny: postmodcl world order is a placc inhabited br de-tcrritorialized COnlllJIIllities, fral' mCllted idcntitics, transllatiollal corporations, and cybcrspalial Aows of [I 1I:1I1ce, It is a world in which brokers, cnlli,st.s, amI klwlif, arc as IIInch i! promincnt relicf as CilnadiallS, Poles, and Kuwaitis, It is, paradoxically, . world made up of plmal worlds, multiple realities and irrealities _ digita artifacts stitched together in a web of spectacles, cineplexes, alld Scgas. No a single "global \'illage," alld e\'en less a system of territorially-distinctnatioll states, postmoclerJI world ordcr is, rather, a pastiche of lJIultiple and overlap ping authoritics - a quasi-feudal, "multiccntric" system,

"l\ledium theory" was first articulated by Harold Innis and then broughi to a much wider <ludicncc by l\lar.slraIlMcLuhan, both of whom wcre Ca. nadian scholars who taught at the Uni\'ersity of laronto, where I now have the good fortune to teach, The central proposition of medium theory is thai changing modes of communication ha\'e effects on the trajectory of social e\olution aIHltlre values and beliefs of societies, l\ledium thcory traces thcse effects to the unique properties of different modes of cOllllllunication _ to

1\ Icdiulll Theory, Ecological Holism,1 and the Stud\', of \Vorld

Order Transformation

/4//// ') ~ pO\'erh' of the many existing, mostly speculati\"c analys~ / of the "informatioll remllll;oll" r;..Cllls 'he illhe/ellt difflCllltfcs 01 dsscssing------=>1/1s\\'e;!Jing changcs as thcy lI/1fold Withont the confidcnce of hindsight, and

\\'ith no God's-eyc \'antage point, thcory becomcs an essential, though nec­ess<Hil~' context-bollnd. tool by which to bring order to the apparent chaos that Roods from abrupt ruptures in social and political institutions. Given the lack of attention International Relations scholarship traditionally dc\"otes to conllllunications, my first stcps in this dircction mllst be across disciplinary boundarics-a potentially dangcrous expedition, though one that also offcrs the prospect of shaking loose dogmatic assumptions ri\-cted in placc by pro­longed amI artificial disciplinary closure. J

At the same time, it is important to recognize that approaches lifted from other fields arc likely to suffcr their own peculiar deficiencies. We should be careful to a\"oid cross-disciplinary hcro.worship for its own sakc. At the very least, it is unlikely that any theory de\'ised within a particular discursive field \\ith its own set of problems can be transp1<Jnted wholesale to another without significant modification, To accommodate my own specific prob­lemalique, the rudimentary insights of Innis, f\IcLuhan, and other medium theorists \\'ill be embedded in an e\'Olutionary approach called "ecological holism." Although the label is new, the approach itself actually synthesizes and expounds \\·hat is already implicit in the work of many medium theo­rists-that is, an open-ended, Ilollleductionist, thoroughly historicist view of

i

19 1;-" I ROllllC I IONI~

IUllwn cxistence that emphasizes contingcncy over continuity both in terms

,f the lraiedor~' of social emlntion ;\ntl tl,e natme amI character of hmnan

Icings. As will be made clear below, while this approach differs in significant

\'ays from mainstream International Relations theorizing, it does find reso­

,;\lICC in the work of at least one prominent theorist-namely. John Rug­,ic-and has important commonalities with others as well.

111 this ck,ptcr, I bcgiu with an overview of thc extant literaturc on com­

iIlmications within the International Relations field. As will be re\'ealed

'e1ow, there is a dearth of scholarship that takes communications as its cen­

ral foclls. l'vlorcovcr, what little exists is cithcr Aawcd in significant ways. or

improperly designed for my central task: an examination of the rclation­

hip between changes in communication techllologies and social and pol it­

:al change at a \\'orld-order level. I then outline the central tenets of me­limll theory. and offer a profile of some of the main contributors to this

pproach, including the issues to which they ha\'e applied their insights.

fsing the \'arious criticisms of medium theory as a backdrop, I then put

:mvard a substantial elaboration and modification of medium theory, tai­

1ring it to the specific concerns of the study, and situating it more clearly ,'ithin the International Relations field. The analytical scheme uscd to or­

,anize the research in the ensuing chapters will emerge from the 11l0difi­

ations made to medium theory.

International Relations Theory and Communications

There is no distinct "school" or "paradigm" of communications within

he field of International Relations. In fact, there are few International Re­

ltions theorists of communication at all (the one important exception being

~arl Deutsch). Individual theorists may allude to commllnication or infor­

nation in their studies, but rare are thc cases where an o\'ertly commlllli­ations approach is 'Hlopted. Although thc communications/International ~elations nexus remains underdeveloped, some distinet themes or issue­

reas can be identified where the interaction between the two is gh'en more

han passing notice. To the limited extent International Relations theorists ha\'e dealt with

ommunications explicitly, the focus has primarily been on cOlltellt to the

xclusion of technology-the im'erse of the theoretical perspecti\'e to be

Medium Theory

emplo~'ed here. For example. considerable work has been done on propa­~antla as ;111 instrlllllcnt of forcil;n polin'. noting thc way a slalc willinanip­nlate messages to garner international support or undermine foes. Z Other

studies working in the content vein ha\'e focused on media reprcsentations, or thc "framing" of inlcrnational cvcnts, and thc way thcse rcprcsentations ma\' inAuence domestic opinion and thus foreign policy outcomes,l Thcse particular approachcs werc COll1ll10n during and aftcr thc Vietnam War,

when the novelty of "the first teledsed war" captured the attention of many

scholars,4 An important subset of this approach includes the many studics

that examine the relationship between content and situation. In this gronp

wc would find stndics on comnlllnication during eriscs;~ intercultural COIII­

munications;6 communications in negotiations and bargaining;' and war­

time and/or diplomatic communications.R

A further subset of thc content-bascd approachcs includcs thosc that

deal with cOlltrol. Work in this area typically examines the way ownership of mcdia crcates an idcological bias that circllJllscrihcs and shapcs dcbate

to further the interests of capital or the state.9 For example, the Gramscian

school of International Relations theory emphasizes the relationship be­

twccn control O\'er mcdia alld cultural hegemony by transnational elitcs. 1lI

Another common focus of control-based approachcs is on how Aows of

information deepen and solidify structures of dependency between the information-rich North and thc information-poor South. 11 Policy proposals

designed to rectify this imbalance, such as that for a New World Infor­

mation Order, were a direct outgrowth of the conclusions reached by these theorists. I: Control-based studics thus tend to emphasize the way com­

munication Aows threaten "cultural sovereignty" or state autonomy while

extending cultural imperialism. ll Although the focus of these analyses is

on control of the medium, the intent is to show how such control deter­

mines content. which is the 1I1timate concern. From this perspective, new

communication technologics are important insofar as thcy cnhancc thc efficicnc\' and scopc of such control, and hence the potcntial penetration

of hcgcmonic idcologics. But they are ultimately sccn as sllbsidiary vari­ables within an O\'erarching global-capitalist mode of production, rather

than as transformati\'e in their own right.

Not all of the work on communications by International Relations the­orists deals exclusively with content; the pioneering work by Karl Deutsch

on communications {lows is an important exception. H Deutsch, who is prob­

ably the figure most identifiable with the communicationsllnternational Re­

21 20 IYIRODUCTION

lations nexus, constructed a formidable and imlo\'ative body of work unique for the central role he assigned to cOlllllllmicative interaction in the expla­

nation of political behavior. When opening any of Deutsch's many works,

the reader cannot help but be struck by a sharp contrast: while Deutsch crafts del;ant historical interpretatiollS, rich in detail, as hackdrops for his

anal~'sis, when his attention turns to explanation, IlOwe\'er, an O\'erarching, almost obsessive compulsion for statistical rigor predominates. Ilis concern

for the quantitative is so strong that Deutsch's formal analysis of comllluni­

cation is thus restricted to the one part of the comnlllnication process that

Gm bc measured: Aow. For Deutsch, communication flows determine the

level of national and international integration. Concentrated e1usters ofcom­

nllmication palterns- measured in terms of the density and Aow of postal

or telephone exchanges, for example-distinguish separate communities.

The unevenness of this distribution helps explain why nationalism is so

prevalent in world politics. The Aip side of this equation -and the expla­

nation for integration, according to Deutsch - is that the density of the Aow

determines the scope of the community. As Aows increase, parochialism

dissolves. Deutsch's work is perhaps best situated as one important part of the mod­

ernization genre of scholarship that Aourished among political scientists,

development theorists, and sociologists between 1950 and 1980. 1; These theorists acknowledged that the properties of media were important, but only

along one narrow dimension: the extent to which they enhanced the Aow or efficicncy of conmlllllications. Such flows were seen as the tools by which local identities llIight be dissolved and then displaceJ by a more solidified,

national identity as part of a more general.state-building project. Hence,

increased literacy among a population was seen as a key to general political

development, as was the creation and maintenance of a centralized "mass

media~ system. In focusing on the potential development of a pluralistic

security cOlmllllllity in Europe and elsewhere, Deutsch and his colleagues

were simply extending this modernization paradigm beyond national bor­

Jers.

The main problem with Deutsch's analysis is that it adopted a nai\'e view

of the assimilative tendencies of increased communication. Extrapolating

from Deutsch's hypotheses, one would expect a single community of hu­

manity as comlllllllication becomes more dense, from tribes to nations to

regions to supranations. Yet the opposite is as often the case. Increased com­

lIlunication Aow does not, by necessity, lead to common identities. 16 Flow

Medium Theory

b~' itself tells us lillIe about the nature of the interaction. In other words, incrcased intercultmal eonnllllllication can casily lead to hostile backlasllcs

rather than to seducti\"e integration. Although students of Deutsch continued

his approach into the 1970s and beyond, the utility of a purely quantitative ,Inah-sis of conllllllllication Aows is limitcd. 17

As in the field of comnlllllications proper, the overwhelming majority of studies on international relations and comllltmications focus 011 sOllie aspect

of message content. In thesc studies, thc spccific message bcing transmiltcd is thought to be the important variable; changes in the medium through

which the message is imparted are abstracted from the analysis. Those that

do not deal exclusivcly with cOlltellt focus instead on conmllmications (lows, as exemplified in the work of Karl Deutsch. In hoth of thesc cases, Ihc

mediulll itself is \'iewed as neutral and imisible. Changes in the technology of comlllllllication arc also ignored.

1'vlediuITI Theory

I\ledium theory Ail'S this abstraction so to speak, fo('ming cxclllsively on >

th~ intrillsic properties of the rTl~~Ii!!1ll.itseJf. Most important from this per­specti\'e is the way large-scale changes in modes o(communicationshape

- aRd e~l1Shdin bcha\ior;rmt!t~.fighrm-oepCfl1tcnror'Trc~gecQ.lili:Dt::SlTTd-"

111 domg so help to restructure social and politi<;<lLinsHtutions. According to this perspective, media arc not simply neutral channels for conveying 111for­

mahon bet\\"eell1\\·~lnorCell\lrOnmenrs.-mltarerafhcfenvirOlllftCTltsill

--.a.o.d-af: t"ellisel\"es.l~ 10 put it si~npl)~~-ed~lll theorYh~fdsthat cOlnmun i­

cation "is a sphere where the technology involved may have an immense

significance for the society in which it occurs, and perhaps radically affect

the concurrent forms of social and economic organization."IQ Unlike

content-based analyses of communications, medium theory is necessarily historical in its approach, contrasting different media environments across

time, and tracing changes in the technology of communication for their

effects on the evolution of social and political order. 211

Although medium theory is associated primarily with twentieth-century

scholarship, many of its core propositions can be unearthed in e1assic texts

dating back to ancient Greece. In the Phaedrus and the Seventh Letter, Plato

has Socrates raise strong objections to the newly emerging wrillen form,

arguing that it destroys memory and weakens the mind, even though, ironi­

23 INTRODUCTION22

Illy, Plato's own analytic epistemology was strongly conditioned by the ef­Tts of writing on mental processes, as Eric Ilavelock, \Valter Ong, and

rnst Cell ncr have argued. ZI r\loral injunctions against the expression of

leas in specific media can be found in the Old 'Iestament, where the Sec­

lid Conmundmcnt prohibits the iconographic depiction of CodY In the

,ssa." 011 the Origirr of umglJages, Rousseau takes up a common theme in lediunl theol),-the transition from primitive orality to writing-arguing

la! wriling transforms the meaning of words and diminishes their \'itality

" suppressing dialects: "The more a people learn to read. the more are its laleets obliterated,"" \Vhat each of these perspeeti\'Cs shares is the central

roposition of medium theory: that the medium of eomnllmieation- far

om being an empty vessel or transparent ehannel- has a significant inAu­

ICC 011 the nature and content of human communication,

Probably the most famous (or infamous, depending on specific \'iew­

Jints) practitioner of medium theory is Marshall McLuhan, as one of his

ell-known aphorisms. "the mediulll is the message" allests. In a series of

ighly publicized books written during the 1960s. l\IcLuhan brought atten­

'In to the central principles of medium theory. mostly through his idiosyn­

atie style ofwriting, which was peppered with one-line aphorisms and gross

'neralizalions that became catch-phrases of the decade, H As Lapham notes, ;eldom in living memory had so obscure a scholar descended so abruptly

1111 so remote a garret into the center ring of celebrity circus:z' Indeed, \\' scholars can rival MeLuhan for achieving such popular notoriety-a

;e McLuhan himself seemed to relish as proof of his own proelamations. ilpc;tring in \\loody Allen films and popular television shows. and professing

, speak in the disconnected, pastiche mode of the "electronic age: l\1c­

uhan saw his role in therapeutic terms: he was to be the oracle of a new

orld on the \'erge of being born. Not surprisingly. the self-imposed trans­

'rmation from bookish literary professor to postmodern electronic guru ienated many still ensconced in the tombs of frpogTdphica, In an ironic

:ist of his theorizing. McLuhan's meteoric rise ma~' ha\'e had the unfor­

mate consequence of obscuring the message beneath the messenger. Clothed in the "mosaic" form of argumentation l\IcLuhan preferred

mosaic" in contrast to the linear-style of reasoning which l\IcLuhan be­

eved to be a product of the Age of Typography), t\IcLuhan's message took

; its starting point some of the more basic themes of medium theol)', re­ea\'ing them into electronic age prophecy, Like other medium theorists,

IcLuhan believed that changes in modes of communication ha\'e impor-

Medium Tileory

tant consequenccs for society-that there are deep. qualitative differenccs betwcen one comllllmic;ltions modc and another, differenccs that arc in

turn reRected in the nature of the communications epoch. For McLnhan,

history can be di\'ided into four snch comlllunications epochs, each ofwhich corresponds to the dominant mode of comllllmicalion of the time: oral,

writing. printing. and electronic. l\IcLuhan's nnique contribution was thc argument that in each of these communications epochs, different media aet

as e:den.simlS of the human senscs with consequences for hoth cognition and social organization, For example. "oral societics" live primarily in an "car

culture.- while writing, amI to a greatcr cxtent print, makes the sense of sight

dominant. Following l\IcLuhan's sensory classification, the electronic re\,­

olution returns ns to the world of primitive orality, to villagc-like ell<:ounters, but now on a global scale: hence, "the global village."zh

One of the morc popnlar. but confusing aspccts of McLuhan's analysis

is his binan' distinction between "hot" and "coo)" media. z7 "Hot" media

extcnd a single sense in high definition; "cool" media arc low in definition.

requiring audience participation. For l\IcLuhan, examples of the former

include print. radio, and film. while examples of the latter would inclnde colloquial specch, telephonc. and television,z~ Though clearly the distinc­

tion is debatable (by most accounts, print is a less passive medium than

tele\'ision in terms of audience participation) like many of McLnhan's "prohes" it had thc unfortnnate conscquence of dirccting deh<lte about me­

dium theory awa~' from its core propositions to l\IcLuhan's morc spcctacnlar but incidental contributions. "l\IcLuhanesque" slogans-such as "the elec­tric light is purc information" or "c1ectric circuitry is Oricntalil',ing thc

West" - became so associated with medium theory that by the time of Mc­

Luhan's death in 1980 few outside of the communications field were aware of the approacll.~Q

Although he was clearly the most famous, McLuhan was merely one

among a Illllllber of other scholars working along IIIcdium theory Iincs in the 1950s and I960s, The inlcraction among these thcorists was strong.

t\lan~' of them met regularly at the University of 'Ioronto-constituting an informal group no\\' referred to as the "Toronto School of Communiea­

tions."JO Generally considered the founder of this "school" was the Canadian

economic historian Harold Adam Innis,J1 Innis had established himself as

an expert on trade in Canadian staple resources before turning to the history of communications. JZ t\IcLuhan's analysis \\'as significantly inAuenced by

Innis's approach -so much so, in fact. that t\IcLuhan had once described

25 2-+ I NTHOIHICTI ON

his own work as merely a "footnotc" to Innis's scholarship. Although both shared a notoriously densc aud complex writing style, lunis's work was morc

cOIl\"Cntional in acadcmic terms. Fmthcrmore, Innis ami I\IcLnhan oper­

ated at diffcrcut b·e1s of analysis." While I\IcLuhan directed most of his

('OUCCIIIS to thc cffcct of mcdia on scmory organization and thought, Innis

conccutratcd primarily on largc-scalc social organization and cultme, or, to cite onc of hmis's more famous titles, on Empire a/l(l CommllnicatiOlls. H

Ilc~ l'f outlines the ccntral thcmcs iu Innis's mcdium thcory:

History is perceived as a series of cpochs separated by discontinuity. F;tch is distinguishcd by dominant forms of mcdia that absorb, rcc­

ord, and transform information into systems of knowledge conso­

JJ;lnt with thc institutional power structme appropriatc to the society

iu qucstiou. The interaction betwecn media form and social reality

crcates various biases, which strongly affect the society's cultmal

oricntatiou and valucs."

Two prominent aspects of Innis's work are his views on space/time biases

of differcnt modcs of communication. and on monopolies of knowlcdge.

Innis argued that different media often exhibit an inherent bias toward either

timc or spacc, and that thcse biases are rcRectcd in the character of ci\'ili­zations. Dmable media that are difficnlt to transport-such as stone, clay,

or parchmcnt-have a time-bias; thesc societies tcnd to be tradition-oricnted,

giving cmphasis to custom and continuity O\'er changc, and with a strong

attachmcnt to thc sacred. Fmthermorc, time-biased ci\·j)izations oftcn lead

to hicrarchical social orders with elite groups; such as Egyptian high priests

or thc medieval Catholic clergy. Space-biased media, such as papyrus or

papcr, arc lighter amI more portablc and tend to support cxpansionist em­

pires characterized by large administrative apparatuses and secular institu­

tions. Using a form of dialectical analysis, Innis argucd that both types of

ci\'ili7;ltions ha\'e a tcudency over time to ossify into rigid and uIHcsponsi\'c

regimes. A reaction occms at the fringes of society, where marginalized

groups take advantage of new technologies of communication, which in turn

results in the ascendancy of a new order.

Clearly, Innis was very much a part of the early-twentieth-century tradi­

tion of civi[izationa[ analysis, associated with Oswald Spengler, Arnold Toyn­

bee, and Pitrim Sorokin. 36 As with these theorists, Innis's work has been

criticized for a kind of cyclical determinism, whereby history is viewed as

Medium Theory

having a master logic that mauifests itself in thc uncnding risc amI fall of civilizatious, Certainly onc could takc a "stroug" reading of, for example, his

space/time bias categorics and scc in them a kind of reductionism at work.

Howe\'cr, a morc gcncrous rcading of Innis's work would highlight his cm­

phasis on social and historical contcxt, on thc way different mcdia have

pote/ltialitie,~ for control according to thc way thcy arc cmploycd in diffcrcnl circumstanccs. For lunis, thc cmphasis is on the interaction betwcen this

social context a11<1 medium form, ralher than on thc modc of couulllmica­

tion in abstraction: "A medium of communication has an important influ­

encc on thc disscmination of knowledgc over space and over timc amI it

bccomcs ncccssary to sludy ils characteristics in ordcr to appraisc ils influ­

ence in its cllltural setting:'F From this reading, Innis's space/time biascs arc

seeu morc as shorthaud dcsignates for the constraints imposcd on ccrtain

typcs of communications by particular mcdia, rather than programmatic

statements on the nature of communications itself. Above all, Innis was

conccmcd with undcrstauding ci\'ilizationaltransformation through thc JCIlS

of changing medium technology-a hithcrto novel focus that required sig­

nificant conceptual innovation to alcrt readers that communication mcdia arc not mcrc cmply \'cssels.

A~ noted in my introduction, medium theory did not generate a widc­sprcad acadcmic following initially, possibly as a result of its introduction by

Innis and I\IcLuhan, Innis's rclatively carly dcath forecloscd thc possibility

of his complcting the morc comprchensivc projcct suggcsted by his two preliminary works, Empire and COlllmunications and The Bias of Commu­/Iicatiom, A~ a consequcncc, hc is known mostly through sccoml-hand in­

terpretations. In the case of I\IcLuhan, his idiosyncratic style probably did

more to obscure the theoretical basis of his work. Quite intentionally, Mc­

Luhan chose to ignore the social scicnce conventions of thc day amI snffcrcd

a predictably dismissh'e response from academia. However, his "mosaic"

stylc of writing may be morc resonant with contemporary postmodern au­

diences as c\'idcnced by the I\IcLuhancsque renaissance that appcars to bc gaining momentum.l~

Nonetheless. mediulTl theory has proved to be a useful tool for a wide

\'ariety of scholars working in different issue-areas, many of whom offer a

more cOll\'entional academic style of analysis than either of the two. A con­

temporary of Innis and I\IcLuhan and a member of the informal ''Toronto

SchooL" classicist Eric Ha\'elock has studied the transition to alphabetic

literacy in ancient Greece, analyzing its impact on classical epistemology.39

27 INTROlJlJCTIO!'l

In a similar \'Cin, social anthropologists Jack Coody and Ian Watt ha\'e stud­ied the transition from primitive orality to writing for its impact 011 both

cognition and social organization, as has Walter Gng from a more general

perspeeti\'e,"o II istorian Elizabeth Eisenstein has undertaken an extensivel~' documented analysis of the cultmal and scientific changes ;lSSociated with

the shift from script to print in medie\'al Europe.'" And though less often associated with the formal approach, many of the central propositions of

medium theory can be found in the work of cnltmal anthropologists like I.ewis I\lnmford and Ernst Gellner, who emphasize the role of technology

in social changeY While most of these theorists touch on large-scale his­

torical changes associated with innovations in conllllllllicatiOll media, none ha\'e focused exclusively on the issue with which I am concerned here: world order transformation, The next section prO\'ides an oven'iew of the modifi­

cations and elaborations that I make to medium theory in order to accom­modate it to this problematique.

Theory and Epistemology

As alluded to abm'e, no theory is without its warts, and medium theo~' is certainly not exempt. In order to accOllllnodate this particular <Jpproach

to Illy own set of questions, some retooling will be necessary if only to O\'er­

come some of the more confusing <Jspects of I\lcLuhan and Innis's notori­ollSl~' difficult styles. The elaborations and revisions to mediulll theory that

follow can be grouped into two categories, both of them ha\'ing to do with the question of cansality. The first is with respeet to the rclath'e emphasis

placed on comlllunication technologies as independent \'ariables; the sec­

ond has to do with clearly articulating the exact nature of the effects that

arise frolll a change in the mode of communication. I will consider each of these in turn.

Toward a Nonreductiollist J\'ledium Theor)'

A recurring criticism of mediulll theory is that it tends toward a form of

monocallsal reductionism and technological determinism. Certainly 1\1c­Luhan bears the brunt of this criticism, though other medium theorists are

not immune. Not unusual would be Carey's harsh indictment of 1\ IcLuhan

for a thorough "technological determinism" that closed down new ap-

Medium Theory

proaches to comnlllllication technology, and Jeftus with only "a soggy con­clusion rathcr than with detailed scholarship."'" Book rcviews of mcdiulll

theorists are particularl~' repetitions, so much so that one gets the impression that reprimanding medinm thcory on this score is a formulaic device. Thus

Havelock's work on the Greck cnlightcnlllcnt is castigatcd for "clinging ...

to a simplistic reduetionism"that "seems to want to make alphabetic literacy the sole causc of thc change In EisclIStcin, one rcvicwcr detects "a

certain reductionist streak" and "a tendcncy to overestiln<Jte printing as

against other forces of change."";

Indeed. a curso~' glance at I\IcLuhan's work in particular might offer

substantiation for these criticisms, especially gi\'en his pcnchant for poctic hyperbole -a style of writing that docs not lend itself well to cavcat. Supcr­

ficial illustrations of technological determinism are not hard to find in books

concei\'Cd as aphoristic "probes" rather than scientific trcatiscs. In fact, Mc­

Luhan's work is constituted by them. In describing his project, McLuhan

once admittcd that "I don't explain-I cxplorc" -;1 rcvealing quote tlwt bcgs

the qllestion of the gronnds on which snch analysis should bc held account­

able."" \ "hilc a strong argument could be madc that a charge of technolog­ical detcrminism is probably bcsidc the point of nlllch of Mel ,1111<1n's work,

the charge itself shollld bc taken seriously in any analysis, sllch as this one, that attempts something more conventional than bullet-likc, aphoristic

probes. Figme I offers a picture of the technological dclcrminist/monocal1Sal

reduetionist model of change. Though no one particular medium theorist

can be said to sllbscribe fully to such a simplistic model of change, some

employ language or semantic inflections that arc at times consistent with

such a picture of the interplay between technology and society. Eisenstein's

use of the word "agent" to describe an inanimate technology- the printing

press-is a case in pointY I\loreO\'er, this base/snperstructure model is a

familiar one across a \'ariety of thcorclic;J1 perspcctives (orthodox M;HXislll

being the prime example) where single overarching "master" variables a~e

held as determinant."~ When critics of medium theorists reprimand them

for technological determinism they are implicitly invoking this flawed pic­

ture of causality. Any attempt at revising medium theory should confront

the man~' interrelated pitfalls inherent in such a simplistic model of change.

The most serious flaw in this model is that it tends to view the introduc­

tion of a new technology of communication as an autonomous force with

certain definite and predictable results irrespeetive of the social and histor­

29 zK I :--lTRODUCTION

Superstructure / Ideas / Behaviors

Base / Material Instrument of Technology

FI G II REI. The technological deterlllinist/mono-callsal redllctionist lIlodei of

change

ical context in which it is introdnced. Specific social phenomena are seen as invariably tied to a specific technology, as if the technology itself had the

power to generate beha\'iors and ideas de 1I0ra. Thus. technological deter­minists tend to put forward such reductionist claims as "the printing press created imlidduality" or "the Reformation is the child of the printing press" -claims that clearly fall apart upon closer ill\"Cstigations that re\'eal the multiplicity of factors in their de\·elopment. By attributing "generati\'e"

causal powers to the mode of communication, the technological determinist model tends to slight the extent to which the technology itself emerges out of a particular context and is itself influenced by social, cultural, and his­torical forces. This relati\'e neglect of contextual factors is especially mis­leading not only because it tends to pridlege the technology over other factors, but also because it produces faulty projections for the introduction of a similar technology in different cultures and contexts. Furthcrmore. the picture of causality employed sets up a strong binary opposition between the "material" and the "ideal," with social forces and ideas placed in a subordi­

nate, deri\'ati\'e position to the material instrttment of technology. And be­cause social consequences are seen as arising out of. or generated by, the technology itself in this way, the technological determinist model portrays

Medium Theory

historical change as a radical disjuncture, with the tecllllology as thc hinge­a \icw of cpodlal changc now widely discrcdited among historians:'"

'10 amid these pitfalls, we must underscore the "social embcddedness" of

technology. \\'e must place greater emphasis on the historical and social context in which teellllologies arc introduced, an insight most forcefully

made by social cOllStrttcti\'ists of technology.ln These theorists trace the way socialnceds de\"Clop toward which certain innovations are applied. 'I 'he 1II0st

comprehensi\"C of thcm show how social forces in conjunction with available material resources and technical knowledge mold the constrttction and in­\'entiOlI of new technologies. In doing so, they dispel the illusion maintained by the teellllological deterlllinist that tecllllologies cnler society amI generate specific social forces ami/or ideas de 110\'0. As I will show in chapters 2 and 5. the emergences of printing and hypermedia respectively were not sudden, "ont-of-nowhere" de\doplllents. In both cases, social needs drovc tecllllD­logical innO\'ation. The creation of new technologies was, in turn, depen­

dcnt 011 the existing stock of scientific knowledge (broadly understood) as well as the <J\'ailable material resources. Technologies are always, in this

sense. socially constructed, Bnt despite its strengths as a correcti\'e to the technological determinist

model, the social comtrttcli\'ist position has a tendency to fall into the op­

posite trap and slight. if not ignore altogether, any independent effects at­tributable to the teclmology itself ollce introduced. It is important to remcm­ber tll<1t although social forces lIIay give direction to tccllllological innO\'ation, they are not completely determinant; once introduced a tech­nolog\' becollles part of the material landscape in which hunwn agents and social groups interact. ha\'ing many unforeseen effects. These are the effects the medium theorist is most concerned with. As I will show in part 1 of this

study. one of the more cnthusiastic early supporters of printing technol­og~'-one of the main social groups responsible for its rapid spread - was the Roman Catholic Chmch. But the salTle bishops and monks who activcly encouraged the establishment of local printing houses never anticipated the way heresies. like the Protestant Reformation, would thrive with the wide­spread a\'ailability of this ne\\' technology. The full effects of printing wcnt unforeseen by the \'ery actors who encouraged and shaped its early devel­

opment. So. while social constrttcti\'ists of technology underscore the way social forces shape teclmologieal innovation, they tend to overlook the pos­sibility that technological innO\'ation, in turn, could have an impact on socieh' itself. But if technological determinists gi\'e a misleading portrayal of

31 INTRODUCTION3°

thcse unforeseen effects and social constructivists slight them altogether. whcrc docs that Icave lIS?

The way I suggest we articulate this process is by reAecting on and am­

plifying one of the more prominent metaphors in medium theory-media

as cmircmmcnts-and by the usc of a Darwinist c\'Olutionary analogy to

descrihe the processes by which marginal forces on thc bordcrs of society

arc brought into the center by the unintended eonsequenccs of tecllllolog­ical innovation."

In classical I)am'inian theories of e\'olution. cm'ironmcntal changes

strongly condition the differential stJrvi"al and reproduction of species,;c

Although specics arc vitally dependent OIl their environmcnt, thc cm'iron­

ment itself cannot be said to engage in the selection process b~' acting on

species; rather, innovations and genetic mutations producc a "ariety of physi­

cal characteristics which, in turn, arc selected blindly according to thcir

"fitness" or mateh with the environment. Not to be confused with

nineteenth-centmy "Social Darwinist" vicws of progrcssivc de"elopmcnt."

emlution from this perspective assumes no inherent direction or pmpose

but is a contingent, open-ended historical process, Similarly, ,1 change in the mode of connlllmication (cmironmcnl) will

"fann" certain social forces and ideas (species) by means of a functional bias toward some and not others, just as natmal environments determine ,,'hich

species prosper by "selecting" for certain physical characteristics, In other

words. the properties of a communications em'ironment-the unique ,,'ays in ,,'hich information can be stored, transmitted, and distributed in that

environment- "fa\'Or" the interests of some social forces and ideas o\'er oth­

ers, These social forces and ideas flomish or thri\'e, while others are placed

at a significant disadvantage and tend to wither o\'er time, Unlike both the

technological determinist and social conslructi,'ist positions, unintended consequences loom large from this perspecti,'e, \Ve ,\'Ould anticipate, in

other words, that some social forces a11(1 ideas that ,,'ere nwrgilwlized in one commtmications em'ironment may resonate strongly oncc that environment

changes. Likewise. those actors and groups that initially ga\'e support to, and

drovc the early development of, a new technology of communication may

find themselves at a disad,'antage once the full characteristics of the new

communications environment take root.

This Darwinist evolutionary analogy is particularly useful because it

moves away from the technological determinist view of technologies "gen­

erating" specific social forces and ideas. It affirms that the genesis of social

Medium Theory

forces and ideas ultimately reAects a multiplicity of factors that cannot bc reduccd to a singlc O\Tr;Hching "master" variable. Instcad, it focuses on the

existing stock of social forces and ideas, asking ,,·hich will likcly flomish or

,,'ithcr dcpending on their "fitness" or match wilh the new comll1lmicalions

endromncnt. It "Ail'S" the pictmc of causality. so to speak. From this per­specti,·e, a ne,,' mode of c01l11lHmication is not an "agent" bnt rathcr a pas­

sin', structmal feature of the tecllllologieal lamlseape in which 11I1I1wn be­

ings interact, It imposes certain constraints or limitations on the nature ami

typc of possible human comnnmications. while facilitating other types, but

it docs not impose thought or beha\'ior in any crude one-to-one fashion. It

is an emirOlnncllt. ;\ml likc natmal cm·iromnents, when it changes sonIc

species ,,·ill be fa\'Ored ,,·hile others will be disadvantaged, not because of an

acti,'e intervention 011 the part of the em'ironment itself, but rather because

thc fnnctional propertics of thc environmcnt eithcr reinforce or constrain

the characteristics and interests of the species within it. The perspective is

historic;ll1~ contingent. insofar as thc type of cffects that cnsuc from a changc

in the commtmications em'ironment depend entirely on the extant social

groups. institutions, and ideas of the time in question. 'Ii) cxtend the analogy. there arc two quite distinct "spceies" upon which

the sclection process bears in a changing eon11l1l1nications environment. which brings me to my second modification to medium theory,

1\1'0 effects: Distributional Changes </lId Changes to Social Epistemolog\'

\Vhen a communications cm'iromllent undergoes fundamental transfor­

mation. two different types of effects can be discerned. Consider the follow­

ing quote by Good~':

Systems of connlHmieation arc clearly related to what l1Ian can makc of his world both internally in terms of thought and externally in terms

of his social and cultmal organization, So changes in the means of

c01l1111lmication ;He linked in dircct as well as indircct ways to changcs in the patterns of human interaction,;~

Good~' is alluding to the dual effects of any change in communication

technologies. I call these hm effects distributional changes and changes to social epistelllologr respecti\'ely,

32 33 INTROlJUCTION

On the one ham\' a change in the comll1lmicatiuns environment has

specific tangible, (li.~/riblJ/iollal effeels on the soci,11 and political infrastruc­

tme. In Innis's formulation, "Inventions in communication compel realign­

ments in the nlOllOpoly or the oligopoly ofknowledge.";; This effect depends

on two ;1SSlIIuptions alluded to above: first is the 1I10st basic proposition of

medium theory. that specific comnllmications em'ironments ha\'e a certain

"logic" or "natme" 1I0t in any determinist sense, but only in the sense of

"m;lking 11Innan communications of certain types easier or more difficlllt.";(,

The second assumption is that society is made up of discernible social forces

that, while not necessarily "rational" in the HOlllo eCOllOl1liCllS, utility­

maximizing scnse of the term, are nonetheless moti\'alcd by certain histori­

calk amI culturally varied interests and goals. By "social forces," I mean

actual social groups, actors, and various forms of social organization-all

11Oflllati\'e or goal-<lriven social behaviors. The methodological task becomes

clear when the two assumptions are married: identifying those social forces

whose interests, goals, and logics of organization arc likely to "fit" with the

new communications environment, and those whose do nol. Typically, those

social forces whose interests, goals, or logics "fit" the new communications

emironmcnt do not just survive in the same form as before. They are em­

powered by the new means of communication at their disposal. They find

a "niche" alld Aomish, and, as a result, become a more prominent feature

of the world politicallalldscape. Likewise, social forces that may ha\'e thrived

in onc commlmications environment may find themseh-es at a significant

disad\'antage once that environment changes.

But the question naturally arises: \\'hy cannot social forces merely adapt

or control technologies to their own ends? One obvious reason is that the

properties of a comlllunications environlllentmight be at such fundamental

odds to the core interests, or raisoll d'e/re, of particular social actors or groups

that they have no choice but to resist vigorously (often with lillie success)

thc fmther spread of that environment. But part of the reason also relates to

the rehltive illAexibility of social forces. Because social forces acquire a cer­

tain "path-dependency" or institutional inertia based on the shared habits of

thought and action of the multitudes of indi\'iduals that comprise them, the~'

cannot easily adapt to new circumstances. Their institutional incumbenc~',

as Gould calls it, "reinforces the stability of the pathway once the little quirks

of early Aexibility push a sequence into a finn channel.";~ Likewise Spru~1

notes how "transaction costs, set belief systems, and standard operating pro­

cedures mitigate against frequent o\'erhaul" ofsocial forces and institutions.;~

Medium Theory

Human beings tend to be creatmes of habit, and social forces conlJJfise mallY habitual indidduals all of whom have limited lifespam ,md thus relatively

short time-horizol1S, The eonseqnences of t()(lay's short-tenn choices - sneh

as promoting Ihe de\'elopment of a new technology that will makc specific

tasks simpler or more efficient (cheaply reproducing bibles, for exanl­

plel-are notusuall~' understood in terms of thcir long-tcrm ilnplic<ltions or

uninlcnded consequences, As I will outline in later el1<Iplcrs, this certainly

describes the predicament of the Roman Catholic Chllfch \'is-a-\'is the print­

ing press. These distributional ch<lnges -changes, tl1<lt is, in the relative

power of social forces - arc perhaps Ihe most dircct conscqucncc ofa change

in the mode of conn111lnication.

On the other hand. to rclmll to Goolly's rcmarks abovc, a change in the

connnunications em'ironment affects not just social organization, but also

the "internal" world of ideas amI ways of thinking.;'1 Conmlunieation envi­

ronments. in other words, also select ideas, social constructs and modes of

cogllition. '11) take but one specific exa III pie oftcn cited by lIlediumtheorists,

the introduction of writing encomages abstract thought bccause words and

ideas can be manipulated amI cumpared to a greater extent tll<ln thcy can

in oral societies.t Ilere we arc conceflled with the way comll1unication,lI

technologies inAuence what Ruggie labels a transformatiun in social epis­/el1lologl'.(,! Social epistemology refers broadly to the wcb-of-beliefs into

which a people arc acenlturated and through which thcy pcrcei\'e the world

arollnclthem.t,: It ellCOlnpaSses an interwu\'en sci of historie<llly contingent

intersubjective menial characteristics, r<lnging from spatial or temporal cog­

niti\'e biases, 10 shared s~'I11bulic forms, to various group identities, or to

"imagined communities," which are unique to a specific historical context,

and differentiate one epoch from anothcr.61 Among French social theorists

and medie\'alists it is referred tu as lIIell/alites collecli\'es-the sl1<lrcd mcntal

predispusitions of a pupulation in time-and it pla}'s a crucial rule in their

inlcrprclation of cultl1fes.t.~

In highlighting changcs to suci<ll epistelllulugy, mediulll theory has a

close affinity to sociology of knowledge or social constructivist approaches.M

At its most basic, what these perspecti\'es share is thc bclief that a wide range

of social. economic, and political factors shape the genesis and struclure of

human thought and behavior, and thus the contours of social epistemology.

l'vlediurn theory adds a materialist dimension to these perspectives by focus­

ing on changes in communication technology. A common example of an

argument linking technological inno\'ation and social cognition in this way

INTROl>l'CTIONH

is Lcwis Mumford's treatment of the impact of thc e10ck on \Vcstern society in '/l'dlllies I1m{ Cil'ili:l1firJII.M Prior to thc elock, the mcaslHe of timc was

determined or~;mically. that is, hy the sun and the scasons; bcginning in the

fOlHlcenth cenlury. lhe measure of time was reoriented by the clock with important social ramifications. The clock "dissociatcd time frolll human

e"ents ;lIld helped create the belief in an indepcndent world of mathemat­ically IIIcasurablc scqucnces .. ,"67 As Mumford gocs on to cxplain:

Whcn one thinks of the day as an abstract space of time, one does

not go to bed with the chickcns on a winter's night: one invents

wicks, chimncys, lamps. gaslights, electric lamps, so as to lISe all

the hours belonging to the day. When one thinks of time, not as a

scquence of experiences, but as a collection of hours. minutes. and

seconds, the habits of adding time and saving time come into ex­

istence. Time took on the character of an enclosed space; it could

be divided, it could be filled up, it could evcn be expanded by the

invention oflabor-saving instruments.... Abstract time became the new medium of existence. 68

l\·lumford's social construction of timc nicely illustrates the type of inter­

prcli"c approach that should be employed when attention turns to the effects

of thc mode of commlmication on social cpistemology. Effcctively cxploring

the link bctween communication technology and social epistemology moves llS cOllSiderabl~' into the rcalm of semiotics and the sludy of symbolic forms,

This mO\'c neccssitatcs a much richcr type of interpreti"c analysis th,m thc methodological strictures of more positi,'ist-oriented theorizing allows: thick,

:1S opposed to thin, description in Clifford Geertz's f0rJ1111lation. 69 \\'e must

he able to tap into and unearth the eonstituti"e social norms of a period, the

unconscious boundaries and biases that frame experience, the symbolic

forms that give meaning to bchavior for a people.-n These social norms and

symbolic forms are crucial because thcy provide what might bc called "the

metaphysical underpinnings" of the constitutive features of world order. If

only by llneonseious biases and orientations common to a people, "social

epistemology" is implicated in the architecture of world order. r..ledium

theory, as used here, does not argue that the mode of communication gen­

erates these symbolic forms and cognitive biases; rather. it argues that

changes in the mode of communication will "favor" or allow for the selection

among the extant symbolic forms and biases of a society, thus gi\"ing rise to

Medium Theory ~s

a new social epislclllolo~'-rclhreading thc wcbs of significancc, in other words.

It is important 10 empha,si7.e thaI thc "fitncss" betwccn e1cmcnts of social epistcmologv and a ncw conn11lmic,ltions environment is largely an il/fer­

gel/erafiol/a{ as opposcd to an il/frap,sychic proccss. In olhcr words, it docs

not mean that each indi,'idnaJ person will snddcnJy abandon long-held

mclaph~sic,ll presnppositions ami cognitivc biases as a rcsult of their expo­

sure to a new conn11lmicatiollS em'ironmcnl. New technologies of com­

munication do nol carry within lhem mysterious magical properties thaI O\'Crpower those with whom lhey comc in contacl. Nor do they come

equipped with their own speci,ll social cpistemology, "Individualisn'" as a

s~'I11bolic form is not im'ariably lied to the printing press (although, as I hope to demonstmte below, the forlller flourishcd in lhe cnvironmcnt of the lat­

ter). Rather, it means that in a particular cOl1n11lmications environment,

particular elements of social epislemo'o~' will have a bcttcr chance of find­ing a "niche" ami thus survi,'ing aud flourishing ovcr limc. In other words,

an increasing portion of those accnlturatcd into a new comnllmicatiol1s en­

"ironment will C0111e to sce a parlicular symbolic form or social construct as more "natural" and "reasonable" -more consistent wilh lheir ovcrall com­mlmic;ltions experiem:e - and it is lhrough th is intergeneralional "selection" process that it will flourish O\'CT time.

Trcating c1J;1nges to soci;ll epislcmology in lhis wa)'-111<lt is. as a kind of "selection" process in which specific ideas, s)'mbols, values, and beliefs flour­

ish or "'it her depending on ;1 chance "filness" wilh the conl1nunications

em'irolllnent- bears a close reselllb\;lIIce to an ;lpproaeh developed by hi­ologist Richard Dawkins, ;lud laken up by olhers, called "memclies."7J

Dawkins and olher practilioners of memetics believe that the basic principles

of "descent with modification" thaI Darwin oUllined apply not just 10 "genes"

but to the processes of cultural e\'Olution as well-to the relative survival of different culturalunils that Dawkins called "memcs";

Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrascs, clothes, fashions,

ways of making pots or building arches. Just as genes propogate them­

seh-es in the gene pool by leaping from body to body via sperm or

eggs, so memes propagate themseh-es in the meme pool by leaping

from brain to brain "ia a process which, in lhe broad sense, can be called imitation, If a scientisl hears, or reads about, a good idea, he

,lJ INTRODUCTION

passes it on to his colleagues amI students. Ill' mentions it in his ar­

tidcs and his lectures. If the idca catehes 011. it can he said 10 propogate

itself. sprcadin~ from brain to brain. 7z

Although DawkillS and othcr practitioners of "memetics" have nol, as far

a,s I know. concei\'ed of a selection mechanism that includes chalH,;ing

modes of l'oll1nllmication, there is an obvious compatibility in the ap­

proaches. ,\nd DawkillS's lengthy list of typical "memes" (tunes, ideas, catch­

phrases, ete) briugs up an important anal~1ical point: the ideas, values, be­

liefs, symbolic forms, and social constructs that comprise the social

epistemolo~\ of a lime would obviollSly blankct a wide spectflnn of di\'Cfse

traits. 'I'rackinf,; down every single one of those that flourish and wither with

a chauge in the mode of eomnHmication would surel~' be a formidable task,

So for ;m;lh tical purposes I have broken them down into a manageable

(though not necessarily exhaus!i\'e) set. In the chapters to follow that focus

011 changcs to social epistemologv (4 and 7), I examine three specific de­

ments: indi\'idllal idell/itics, spatial biases, and il/lagined communities. As I

hope to demonstrate, changes in all three of these elements (the way "the

self' is COllt'ci\'ed, the way space is ordered, and the way group identities arc

imagined). arc crucial in providing what might be called the "metaph~'sical

underpinnings" of world order. As I also hope to show, changes in modes of

conn11lmication have an important impact on their e\'olution.

In SIlm, changes in modes of communication ha\'c an important effect

on Ihe naturc ami character of society and politics. Thcse cffccts \'ary in

teflllS of thc social and historical context in which the technology is devel­

oped. New technologies of communication do not generate specific social

forces and/or ideas, as technological determinists would ha\'C it. Rather, they

rc,cilita/e amI com/rain the extant social forces and ideas of a society. The

11\'pothesized process can be likened to the interaction between species and

a changing n;ltural environment. New media environments favor certain

social forces ami ideas by means of a functional bias toward some and not

others, much the same as natural environments determine which species

prosper by "selecting" for certain physical characteristics. In other words,

social forces and ideas survive differentially according to their "fitness" or

match with the new media environment-a process that is both open-ended

and contingent.

There are two conceptually distinct ways in which these effects operate:

distributional changes and changes to social epistemology. Distributional

Medium Theory ,7

changcs refer to changcs in the relati\'C power of social forccs, while clwnges

to social cpislcnlology refcr to changcs <I1nong e1Clnents of thc prc\'ailing

mcn/ali/es collecli\'e,s, Thesc two conceptually distinct effccts will in lum

IHO\'idc the basis for the anal~,tical scheme to be employcd in the chapters

to follow. The study is di\'ided into two parts, both of which arc cOlnpriscd

of three chapters:

• the first chapter in each part IHO\'ides a historical amI descriptive

O\'en'iew of the de\'elopmcnt of a new eomllllmieations

el1\'ironmcnt - printinf,; in part I and hypermedia in part 2 (chaptcrs 2 amI 5);

the second ch<lpter examines the distribntionaJ changes that resnlt

from the change in the mode of comnlunication (chapters' a11(1 () I;

• the third chapter examines the changes to social epistcmology that

rcsnlt from the change in the mode of conllllunication (chapter,s 4

amI 7).

Ecologicalllolisln and t\lediulI1 Theory

Ilm'iug made these suhstantialmodificaliollS and e1aboraliol1.S to nledinm

theory. I am now in a better position to articulate more clearly the Incta­

theorctical assumptiollS on whi<:h this study rests. The nomeductive, no­

lutionary medium theory approach outlined abO\'e 11Il1St, by necessity, cn­

compass a 111uch wider perspecti\'e on the dynamics of hUluan/technological

interaction than the simple 1110110causal picture portrayed in figure I. Figure

2 depicts what I call an "ecological holist" picture of human existence. This

figure essentially Imcarths amI clearly articulates the cultural materialist IU1­

derpinning that is at least implicit in the writings of Innis, and perhaps l110St

explicit in the work of those medium theorists with a social anthropological

background like Goody, ~Iumford, and Gellner. It is significantly influenced

by the work of the French Annales school of historians, represented by Brau­

del, Duby, and Le Goff. Each ring in the figure refers to a conceptually

distinct component of human existence, none of which are reducible to the

others. The lines separating each component are not rigid, but blend into

one another at the margins.

,;') INTRO()lICTIO:,-/

FI G 1I R E 2, Ecological Holism

At the center are the hasic inherited neurophysiological adaptatioll.~ alld traits shared by the species as a whole. Not to be confused with crude clas­sical realist speculations on a fixed al\(I determining "human nature," nor with the neoclassical "rational" actor assumptions,-1 these dispositions are

confined to certain morphological or neurological properties shared by the

species as a whole. The mere fact that they are so general as to be able to

accommodate the \'ast di\'ersity of cultures that ha\'e existed throughout his­

tory means that they will ha\'e little bearing on our analysis.-~

The first ring rcfers to the lI'eh-{}(beliefs, or what I referred to earlier as "social epistemology." '10 reiterate, it includes a historically contingent web

of intersubjecti\'e values, beliefs, cognith'e biases, al\(I symbolic and linguis­

tic forms into which a people are acculturated. This web-of-beliefs is not

species-wide, but \'ariable from culture to culture or epoch to epoch. It forms

the broad epistemic lens through which a people interpret and act on the world around them. The web-of-beliefs blends into the next ring, which is

composed of formal and informal illstitutiolls, ranging from states and cor-

Medium Theory N

potations and organizations on the formal side to habits of actions and gen­eralmodcs of organizillg l(lllllan intcraction alld subsistellee 011 the illformal

side,-; Sitnated between the material environment and institntions is tech­Ilolog\·. In its narrow sense, tecllllologv refers to applied knowledge, bnt here

the terlll is nsed in its more comnlOn sense to encompass both practical or applied knowledge (formally, teclmolog\') as well as the material instruments or artifaets of technology (formally, technics), such as the printing press.7fi

As a material artifact, technology is constrained by the available resources

of a time and place: hut as a tool it is always conditioned by and emerges out of existillg social institntions, knowledge, and skills-what we earlier referred to as the "social elllbeddedness" oftecllllology.ln ontological Icrms,

technology should not he seen as mercly an appendage to human society,

but a dceph- interh\'ined constituti\'C feature oflnllnan society. In Mazlish's

words:

The e\'idence now seems strong that humans evolved from the other

animals through a continuous interaction of tool, physical, and

melltal-emotional changes. The old view-that humans arrived on the

e\'Olutionary scene flllly formed al\(I then proceeded to discover tools

and the new \\a\'s of life that they made possihle-no longer appears acceptable.-­

The last ring refers to the material or geopf,ysical elH'irrJIIl1lent, including

demographics, disease. climate, and natural resources, all of which have a loose constraining effect 011 the broad trajectory and character of social evo­lution.-~ For millennia theorists ha\'C speculated on the impact of these broad

material factors on the nature of human societies, amI there is a strong

tradition of "natural" theorizing reaching back to the ancient Creeks,7'! For

the time-frame of most analyses, howe\'er, these basic material factors can

be aSSllmed aW;1\' as rclati\'Cly insignificant. Bllt in stl\(lies that foens on the

IOllgue duree. they take 011 more importanec,~"

Although the figure ma\' gi\'e the appearance of stasis, it is important to

emphasize that ecological holism is fundamentally historicist in outlook,

meaning that human existence is seen as a eontinuollsly evolving interplay between em'ironmental al\(I technological conditions, formal and informal

institutions and practices, and intersubjeetive values and beliefs. From this perspeeth'e, "rational ities," identities, nations, and states - though potentially

stable in their basic contours O\'er relati\·eJy long periods of time-are none­

41 4° 11'\ T R 0 [) II C T ION

theless prodllcts of historical cOlltill~ellcies alld thlls sllbject to chan~e as nallnc alld socit'l\, cvoh-cs,"

It is also importallt to be clear that change from this perspecti\'e is not

the ullfoldin~ of predetermined pallerns, or teleological processes. but rather

"thc gralld aggrcgation and multiplication of the actions of indi\'idnals and

grollps ill COllcrete historical circumstances as these illdi\'idnals arc respolld­

illg to a IIll1ltiplicity of biological, psychological and social needs.~~2 Thus

c1wnee or contillgeney play an important part in the natme and direction

of social ('\'()Intion. From an ecological holist perspecti\'e. eonceptnal. tech­

1I010gical. ccollomie, or other changes in human pallerns of interaetion can

alter the 1IIIIIIall de\'elopmental p;lth in ullexpected w;lys that de~\' more

linear notions of change. In this respect, ecological holism runs contrary to

those theories that argue for the existence of recurring "Iong-cycles~ or pro­

gressi\'e "stages of de\'elopmen( throngh which all societies arc assumed to

passY It is informed by a "Darwinist" \'iew of history-that is. one that sees

no lmfolding logic to history, but only "descent with modification:~j

Of course, fUlldamental change in the basic structures of human society

is not continuous but episodic gi\'Cn the relati\'e stability and endurance of

human institutions. ideas, and habits, In Gaddis's words, "comlitions can

persist for years with so little alteration that people come to accept them as

pernl;llIelll."~' III the past, there was a tendency among some social theorists

to look for a sillgle "master~ \'ariable that could be seen as dri\'ing all episodes

of fU\l(hll1lental c1wnge, whether it be the mode of prodnction or teclmol­

ogies of destrnction. But according to the ecological holist perspecti\'e ad­

\'anced here. the specific source of flmdamental change at anyone time in

hUll1an history c;nmot be stated 011 a priori grounds. amI typically reAects a

multiplicity of factors- both material and ideal-that happen to cOl1\'erge

in the form of a slldden transformation in hUll1an patterns of interaction.'6

1\ Iediunl theory can be seen as a subsidiary approach embedded in an

ecological holist pcrspecti\'e, isolating those changes that arc encouraged

alld facilitated by a change in the 1I10de of comnllmieation, This focus

should not be taken as an assertion of the fundamental primacy of eom­

nllmications O\Tr other spheres of human existence, but merely a heuristic

di\'ision of scholarly labor. Technological changes in communications media

are one among many other important innO\'ations that produce no\'elty in

social interaction, Yet because connl1lmieation-like production and secu­

rity- is so \'ita] to human existence, these changes will likely ha\'e far­

reaching implications. Thus while in this study I am focusing on the rela-

Medium Theory

tiomhip between changing modes of cOlmlllmieation and world order

transformation. Ihe focus itself should not be ettlwted with a kind of "master

narrati\e~ to histor\' centered on connnunications,

Ecological JJolislll, l\lcdiulll Thcory, and Intcrnational Relations Theory

It shollid bc clear from the ()\'Cf\'icw that the tenor of IIIcdillm theory is

c1earl~' aligned with the "historical sociology" side of thc International Re­

Iatiom ficld. as opposed to the more ahistorical approaches Robert Kcohane

identifies as "rationalist:~- Robert Cox points olltthat rationalist :Ipproaches.

which he calls "problem-soh-ing," arc suitable to "periods ofapparent stability

or fixity in power rclations,"~~ Surprisingly. these approaches represcnt the

majority of the ficld today. C\Tn thon~h we appear to be in an cra of fnn­

damcntaltransformation, As Gellner renwrks: 'Thc great paradox of om agc

is that although it is undergoing social and intellectual change of totally

unprecedented speed amI depth. its thought has become, ill the main, 1111­

historical or ahistorical."~"

The two dominant approaches in the field today-lleorcalislll and IICO­

liberalism-are ahistoricalnot because the\' are ullable to ;JJnass "historical"

details in support of their claims, but rather because they seck essentially to

escape histo~' b~' gronllding their thcories in fnndamelltal prcsnpposiliollS­

be it the anarchic structure or the desire to maximize utilities-which are

posited as Imi\'ersal (i,c,. timelcss, contextlcss) f01mdations."1J III Adlcr's ter­

minology. they are both exalllples of what he calls theorics of "being" - "a

pre\'alent notion that sees e\'e~-thing in nature and society as static and

mechanistic. inclnding change,""1 For neorealists espccially, the main com­

ponents of the inlcrllational s~'stem arc trcated as if "suspellded in space"­

"time has lillie to do with thelll, and 1II()\'elllcnt alld chan~c :JrC lincar. . , ,"'JZ

E\'en those cyclical theorists like Robert Gilpin who appear 10 gi\'c a 1II0re

dynamic treatment to the interllational syslcm by allowing for differential

grO\\,th still present change as merely the rearrangement of ratiOlwlly moti­

vated "units" under the lIni\'ersal constant of a constraining anarchic order.'1l

Likewise, neoliberalism offers what Wendt calls a "beha\'ioral conception of

both process and institutions: they change behavior but not identities and

interests,~~ For all thcir apparent clifferences over the question of relati\'e

\'erSllS absolute gains, neoliberals and neorealists are alike in assuming the

43 -F IN IKOIIl'C 110:'\

natural order of world politics to be one of lmitarY rational actors in an

;Inarchic sCllin!;.'''

The altem;lli\'e to thcories of beinE;, accordinE; to Adler, arc theories of

"becominE;" -tbose that sec human existence "as a perm;ment proccss of

changc and cmlutiou, e\'euthat \\hich appears to bc static" -a category that

oln-iollSk inclndes ecologic<11 holism% There arc fc\\' cxamples of the type

of full-blown historicism elwracteristic of theorics of "becoming" in the In­

lernational Relations field, although that is changing, Increasingly. a I1Il1nber

of scholars sec their work as fallillg outside of either the neorealist or nco­

libcral camps, amI what might be termed a "historicist" school of Interna­

tional Relations theorists can be identified ill the field."- The COllmlOn de­

nominator of this school is a shared \·iew of human institl1tiolls and practices

(including states. natiolls, identities, aud illterests) as products of historical

contingellcies amltbus sl1bjectto challge O\'Cltime, Ilistoricists sec politics

not as a eyelical. rceurring phenomellon (as lIeorealists clearly do) but rather as ,m opell-cnded proccss,

II istoricists can be differeutiated ill terms of the relati\'C weight they pl<1ce

011 the "material" versus the "ideal" as expl<1n<1tory \ariables-a distinction

that harkcns back to l\tmx ami I legcl respccti\'cly. For cxample. Robcrt Cox's

"historical stlllctures" approach. which explicitly articulates all opell-ellded

e\'Olutionary theory that takes iuto account material ell\'ironmellts. institu­

tiolls. and illtcrsubjecti\'e \'alues alld beliefs, ultimatek falls toward the "ma­

teri;ll" end of the spectrum because of the O\'Crriding importance allached

to the mode of production as a determinant \'ariable."~ Likewise. Daniel

DCl1dncy's oll!;oing rcconstlllclion of materialist gcopolitical thcories­

\\'hich explorcs thc relationship among broad envirollmental cOllditiolls.

changing teclmologies of destruction, and world order formation-also falls

toward the "malcrial" end because of the weight gi\'C1I to military teelmol­

ogies.'N 'Iuward the "ideas" end of the spectrum fall the social constructi\'ist

theories of \\'elldt. Kratochwil, and others, which foclls 011 the historical

mallcability of interests, idelltities. ami illStitlltiollS,I'" These approaches tend

to cOllcentrate purely on the interaction between social epistemology and

institutiolls to the cxclusion of em'iromllerltal or teclmologiGll factors. They

lack the "grounding" of the more materially encompassing theories outlined

abo\'e, and tend to downplay or ignore material factors as causally significant

\',uiab1cs in politics.

As shown in Figure Z, ecological holism can be seen as an attempt to

O\'erC01l1e this binary opposition between "materiar factors and "ideas:

Medium Theory

\\hich are seen 1I0t in either/or terms. but as part of a single whole, Ecolog­

ical holism takcs as its starting point the basic materialist posiliouthat hnman

beiugs, like all other orE;auisms, arc \'itally dependent on, amI thus inAu­

em'Cd by. the clI\'ironmcnt arollml them, Ilowc\'Cr, it recognizes Ibal he­

camc humau beings h<l\'e the unique ahility to cOlllmunicate complex sym­

bols amI idcas. the~' do not approach their enviromnent on the basis of pure illstinct (as other organisllls do) nor as a linguistically naked "given," but

rather through a complex web-of-beliefs, symbolic forms, amI social con­

structs inlo which the~' are acculturated and through which they perceive

the world around them, ;\s Lllke describes:

The \\a~'s in which people apprehend their environment is (prelfor­

mubted b~' the statements abollt ideas, "reality," objects, facts, reb­

tiol1S, ,md so forlh Ihat organize a parlicular field of referencc. The

human subject in am' gi\'en historical era apprehends her or his world,

thc self. and thc ((.,lations betwcen sclf ami othcrs ou the basis of

historical discursi\'e practices that name. locate, and organize concrete

and abstract knO\dedge and experience. 1111

There arc fc\\' examples of ecological holism in thc field today, though

Ruggie's work on historicaltransforrnation is a clear exception, In "'Ierrito­

rialih' amI Bemnd:' Ruggic states Ihe ecological holist position Ihat "material

e11\·irolmlents. stralcgic beh;l\'ior, and social epistemology" arc "irreducible

to one another."'''' Other examples that arc perhaps less explicitly illustrativc

inclndc the \\'ork of ElIIst Ilaas amI Emannel Adlcr, who share the view that

"politics is a historical process that changes with physical changcs amlthc

e\'Olution of meanings,"'''' In their empirical \\'ork. both Haas and Adler have

focused on a more narro\\' time-frame in which "physical changes" can be

treated as a "gi\'en" for the purposes of analysis. Thus Adler's work on "epi­

stemic con1l11l1nities" bears a strong resemblance to the social constructivism

of \Vcndt amI Kr,ltoch\\'i1-the major difference being the laller arc not

explicit about the extent to which material, geophysical factors are part of

their onlolog\'.'''~ Of course, the differences bctwecn ecological holism and

social constructi\ism are minimal compared to their similarities, especially

in contrast to mainstream rationalist approaches, which treat interests and

identities as relati\'ely fixed. Howe\'er, ecological holism provides a more

eomprehensi\'e picture of human existence, one that is vital for an exami­

nation of the type of large-scale historical changes undertakcn here.

[:'<TROIJUCTION-H

On l\fcthodolog;~'

(1)\iOllSly, thc \Trsion of mcdium thcory I ha\'c put forward is incom­

latihlc with a positi\'ist methodology, t-.lost important. thc cmphasis on his­

oricity and radical contingcncy in social evolution c1ashcs with thc idea of

,\\ ~ standing apart frolll history. and I11IIs. hy cxfcmioll, thc mc of thc

Icducti\'c-nomological or co\'ering-Iaw model of inquiry. But the cO\'Cring­,1W model is not the only available mcthodology for thc typc of alia lysis in

I'hicll I am cngaged in this study. III rccent years. theorists have begun to

'xplore the use of historicalnarratire as a mode of explanation. 'o;This modc ccks to lillk occurrcnccs along a temporal dimcnsion. tracing thc \',Hiahlcs

Ind cOlltingcncics that wcre important in taking thc cmlutionary path down me road as opposed to anothcr. Of course, narrati\'c explallations arc not

onfincd to hUlllan pcrsonalitics or what has oftcn bccn callcd disparagingl~'

hc "history of e\Tnts." As Donald Polkil1!;horne put it, "thc narrati\'e scheme

'rganil-cs thc illdi\'idllal e\'cnts it ,Iddrcsses using a framcwork of human

lurpOSCS and dcsircs. including the limits and opportunities posed by the

Ihysical, cultural. and pcrsonal em'ironments,"'0<1 Nor, do historical narra­

i\'cs prccludc c1car analytical schemcs or logical protocols to incrcasc thc

'crisimilitllllc of thcir accounts. Thc usc of cOllllterfactuals is crucial to this nodc of explanation. as are structurcd. focused comparisons.lo~ So in the

lagcs to follow, my argumcnts cstahlishing thc importance of changing

nodcs of comnllllliGltion will rely lIot just 011 as much cmpirical c\'idcncc

IS can he gleancd from primary and secondary sources. but on logical ar­;lImcnts as wcll, pointillg to "what might ha\'c been" had thcre bcen no

'h,lIlge in the comnllmications environment a't all. 1\Iost important. though.

n looking to the past in a structured, focused way, I ha\'e also constructed

m analytical Icns through which to interprct changcs that arc occurring

oday. In thc long run. it is the relati\'e utility of thc latter that willultimatcly

JrO\'e to be thc most important measure of this study,

Part 1

Printing and the Medieval to Modern

World Order Transformation

III. ~IFf)IF\'AI. TO ~IOf)FR:-J

had riscn to 23(>.111 By thc sixteenth century. Il'cstcrn Europe had entered ;]

ncll' conlll1lmications clll'iromncnt at thc ccnter of which Irere cheap, Illass­

prodnced prillted documents emanating frolll the many printing presses sf retched across tl,e land,

In this chapter, I have traced the de\'elopl1lent of cOJ11I11I1I1ication teeh­

nologics tlrrough the fI.·fiddle Ages leading up to the illl'ention of the printing

press in the mid-fiftccnth century I hal'e argued tlrat tire rise of the Church

in the early Middle Ages Was contingent on the comnll1l1ications elll'iron­

mellt of the timc, Its spiritual attachment to litemcy alld the reproduction

of the writtcn word, its usc of parduncnt as a medium of con1l11unic'ltion.

and tire specific material and ecologicll circn11lstances of wcstem European

all helped prodnce a hospitable elll'ironlJJent for the Church's rise to he­

gemony in thc fl.fiddlc Ages, \Vhilc thc Roman Catholic Clrurch had main­

taincd a monopoly OI'er Initten comlllunications "p to the twelfth eentu~', frOIII that point onward a gradual change in the con1l11l11lications el1\'iron­

ment hegan to occur, as evidenced hy the growth of secular literacy and the

usc and reproduction of written documents outside of the formal papal­

monastic network, In this respect. the illl'ention of printing actually rcpre­

sents the culmination of slowly accllmulating social pressures. In other

words. the jlll'ention of printing was not a sudden "out-of-nowhere" del'c1­

0plnent. hnt was <In outgrowth of cOll\'erging social prcssures for more effi­cient conlll1t11licatiollS, In conjunction with the hro,lder social and eco­

nomic conditions of the time. howel'er, once printing began to spread

throngh \Vestern Emope. it remlntionized the COIlllllllllications elll'iron­

mellt with significant consequences for society and politics, In the next t\\'o

chapters. I examine tIle ways in which the emergence of this ne\\' coml11U­

nications em'ironment played a part in the transforJnation of the lnediel'al world order.

Print and the 1Vledievcl1 to3 l'vIodem \Vorld Order Transformation:

Distributional Changes

Changes in the mode of cOIllmunic,ltion hare far-reaching,

fundamelltal illlplicatiollS for the social amI political infrastructure of an era

and for the trajector~' of social emlntiol\. In chapter J I outlined two COll­

eeptuall~' distinct effects that arise from a change in the mode of commu­

nication: di~tribution,11 ch~lllges and changes to soci,t1 epistemology. III this

chapter. I concentralc onl~' on the forlller. Distriblltional changes arc changes in the relatil'e power of social forces

as a consetjuence of the change in the mode of conllllunication, Because

modes of COllllllllllication translllit amI .store infortniltion in uniqllc ways,

social forces whose illtercsts match a cOllllnunicatiollS ellviromnent will be fal'ored while those whose interests do not will be placed at a disadvantage.

Social forces sun'ile differentia"~'. in other Ilurds. according to thcir "fitness" with the nell' media elll'iron1l1ent- a process that is both open-ended amI

cOlltillgent. Thus. medinm theor~' offers ncither all expl;lllation of the gen­

esis of particular social forces. nor why they were animated hy partieuhH

interests ,IS opposed to others, Its purposc is to explaill why those forces

flourished or withered at a particular historical juncture. Distributional changes undercut some social forces while they advance

the interests of othcrs, III this chapter. I examine the way distributional

changes associated with the del'e1opment of printing played a part in the

rnediel'al-to-1l10dern l\'Orld order transformation in Europe. I begin by ex­

amining the way the change in the mode of comlllunication helped to

(I,.., ~ILI)fI-:""L TO ;\IOIJER:'>:

disso,,"e the architecture of political authority in the late I\liddle Ages. Spe­cificall~'. I ('\pJore the ,,'ar two social forces. the Prot{'~tant Reformation and scientific humanism. were famred by the new media em-ironment to the disa<hantage of the Roman Catholic Church, I then examine the way trallS­fortn,llions in socioeconomic relatiollS that were elICorrraged h~' tIle change in the mode of eOllllllunication helped to undermine the basis of feudal socia I relal ions and pa"e the way for I110dern contractua I socioeconolll ic relations among an increasingly important segl11cnt of the late lnedie"al population: the urban bourgeoisie, This particular distributional change had what I,'e lIlight call a "Ievcling" effect on patterns of political and economic ohJi~ati(ln. at least in rrrb,1Il ,1reas, clltting throllgh the elltallgled wehs of personallm'alties characteristic of the feudal era and opening up the possi­hility for COllllnon rule fro1ll a single center. Finalh-, I turn to the wa~' the change in the 1Il0de of c0I11111unieation famred the rise of modern state bmeaucracies and centralized political authority throughout parts ofwestern Europe, As Inan)" ha"e pointed out, the cOI1\'erging interests of the latter two social forces-the urban bourgeoisie and centralizing state monarchies­were erncial in molding the architecture of Illodern world order in Europe.

Thc Ncw' 1\ledia Environment and the Dissolution of the )\'Icdic\'al Ordcr

'llle Protesta1lt Refonllatioll

As outlined at the end of the previom chapter, by the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries strong social forces were emerging with nO"el agendas amI interests that were pllShing at the margins of the Church's hegemony 0'"('[ kllowledge reproduction, SOl11e of these social forces can be character­ized as reactionary nl0,"<'ments within the Church itself. In this category. "'e would inclnde the ,'ariollS religious "heresies" tllat periodically and sponta­neousl~' surfaced throughout western Europe beginning in the twelfth cen­tury, Although their specific goals and ideologies '"<Hied eonsiderabl~'. these heretical movements arose during the High I\Iiddle Ages mostly in reaction to the Church hierarchy, which, as pointed out in the pre"iolls chapter, was assullling a more legalistic and secular face distanced from the popular de­\"ation tl1<1t marked its appeal during its embryonic da~'s as a missionary sect.' The tophea,y adlllinistrati,'e organs of the Papal gm'ernment appeared less

Distributional Cilalllje5 "/

"other-world"''' and 1\10re corrnpt. cspecially ,IS succcssive popcs eng;lged in or suc('\n1J!>ed 10 pOl\cr_politicallllachinations-an il1la~e dOl1hly reil1forccd by events such as the Great Schislll,1 This declinc in Church popularity is reReeted in the wa~' nWIIY Christians saw thc "Black Death" plague Ihal swept through western buope ill the fourteenth centmy as a symbol ofGod's

dissatisfaction with the corruption of the Church.! Prior to the elncrgcncc of printing. thc Cllllfch had hecn relatively SIlt'­

cessful in sqnelching and cont,lining heresies prim,uily "hecausc it always had better interllallines of cOlllnlllllicatioJl than its challcngers."1 Those that were not stamped out )n' "iolcnce, or compelle in/rare, were more than likelr to be coopted bv a fonn of special privilege or to be ignored altogether, as various heresies Riekered amI then faded without nleans of llIass connllll­nication,; Febne amI i\ Iarlin wonder "wlwt lIIight have happelled if somc of the e,ulier heresies (the Ilussite, for example) had the power of the press at their disposal-power th,lt Luther and Cah'in used with great skill, first in the attack Oil gome ,md then in tIle diffnsion of their new doctrines."A The Inquisition. established ill the thirteenth century, was a reRection of both the growing heretical clements within society and the Churcll's more stringcnt reprisals agaimt thclll.- It rel\1ained an effective countermeasme so long as the doclrilles Rowing from heretical movements could be halted by taking l\1easures against the persons upon whol\1 the widespread trans­mission of such doctrines dcpended, \Vith the rapid dissemination amI pub­lication afforded )\' prillting, howe,·er. heretical 1\100'emCllts had a mnch better chance of spreading thcir message heyond the locality in which they emerged. making it llIuch more difficult for the Church to take effective

COulltcnneasmes, To illustrate tile way tecllllOlogical il1nO\'ations have unintended cOl1Se­

quences, amI how fathoming sl1eh conseql1enees are difficult for those living through thelll, it is interesting to note that the ChllTch was initially enthu­siastic ahout the prillting prcss, making thorollgh lise of it, for exaillple, ill its anli-Turkish crusade,' One particular cardinal. Nicholas ofCusa, referred to the printing press as a "di"ine art" hecause of the "'ay that the technology would enable poor priests who would otherwise be unable 10 ;lfford Bibles to ha\'e access to cheaper, mass-produced \'ersions.'1 And it is somewhat ironic that the first dated printed product from Gutenberg's \\'orhhop was an indulgence-the ,'e~' emblem of Church corruption in the eres of the Protestant Reformation,I" In fact. the demand for printed books and liturgies among Catholic churchmen drove the initial establishment of printing

,IEIlIE\'"'' TO ;\IOIJER:"7°

presses throughout Europe in the latter half of the fifteenth century. Some of the Iargcst IIIOII;lslcries. like CIIlIlY amI Citeaux OIl Dijoll. illvited prillters from Gernlan~' to set up printing workshops alld to teach monks the art of printillg. rI Thc early printers thrived 011 commissiolls from nlOll<lsteries ami cathcdrals for Latill hihles, missals, psalters. alld antiphlln;uies.'~ In one of the first hooks prillted by the Brothers of the Common Life in Rostoek there appeared the dedication that printing was the "handmaid of the Church."" Onl~' hilldsi~ht could tell them how wrong they were.

lt is well known among historians and laypersons alike that the prillting press was closely intertwined with the Protestant Reformation. What is often confused is the specific causal relationship hetween the two. with techllo­logical determinists often attributing to the printing press the gellesis of the Protestant Reformation itself. H Ilowe\·er. prior to print there were m,lIly other similar outbreaks of heresies. which clearly mitigates any simplistic one-to-{)ne connection. And certainlv the outbreak of the Protestant Refor­mation cannot he explained without reference to the deterioratillg ecollomic and social conditions of central and northern Europe. which created an oppressive and intolerable environment for many. J; As Luke describes. "Be­fore Luther became a figure of public and political interest in 1517. German hurghers and peasants. artisans and merchants. and many humanist academ­ics shared a feeling of unrest and dissatisfaction with existing social. eco­nomic, and political-religious conditions. amI were ready for a change to­wards what for them promised to he a more just ami Christian society."'" What could be said with confidence is that prillting had a remlutionary effect 011 Ihe cxtent to which one particular heresy could spread widely and rapidly with devastating consequences for the Church's containment strat­egies. In other words, the properties of the printing eln-ironment favored the interests of the Protestant Reformation to the disadvantage of the Papal hi­erareh\·.

Ilow did the Protestant Reformation "fif the printing environment? T\lost re\"(llutionary was the way that printing afforded an opportunity for one per­son to reach a mass audience in an unpreeedentedly short period of time. In 1517, the German theologian Martin Luther puhlicized 95 theses in Latin criticizing a \'ariety of Church practices. centering mostly on the rise in tithes, indulgences, and benefices. As Dudley notes: "A century earlier, the issue might ha\'e smoldered for years before breaking into flame. E\'en then, its effects would have been purely local, as in the case of the followers of John Huss whose revolt (1419-1436) had been confined to Bohemia."17

Distributional Changes 71

\\'ithin fifteen days Lnther's theses had heell translated into Ccrmall, snm­malized, alld disl'ilJlllul tOl'\TIY part of thc cOIIIII,y,'" Durillg Llllhcr's lifc, fi\T times as mam' works authored h~' Luther alone were pllhlished than by all the C,ltholic contrO\Trsialists pnt together. 1 Martin I,lither alolle was'1

respollSihlc for 20 percent of thc approximately 10.000 pamphlet editions issued from presses in Cerman-spcakin~ territories hetwcen 1500 amI I qO,2o Illitially. the \'(llllllle increased dramatic<llIy, with Luther's published output rising frolll 87 prilltings in 1518 to a high of 390 printillgs in 1523. 21 As Andermn put it, "In effect. Luther hecame the first hest-selling author so kIlOlI'll::: And of course the rise ill output was not restrieted to that eU1<1­nating frolll I.uther alollc; from 1517-1518- thc first year of the Rcfornw­lion-there was a 530 percellt increase in the production of pamphlcts is­sued frolll Gerlll;1ll spcaking presses.:' Prior the emergence of the printing em'irolunent, heresies simi\;H in form to the Protcstallt Reforl.uation could not count on such a quick ignition rate,

There were other W;lyS ill which the printillg ellvironmellt matched the interests of the Protestallt Reformation. Printing permitted the mass produc­tion of small. cheap pamph lets that favored the Reformer's strategic interest both in rapid disseminatioll of propaganda. in the form of cheap placards and posters, and the concealment of heretical printed works from authorities by both producers amI consumers. Pamphlets were produced in quarto for­mat-that is, made up of sheets folded twice to make four leaves or cight pages-and withont a hard eO\·er. amI were referred to by the Gcrm<ln term Flugscflrifiell. or "fl~'ing \Hitings."'~ Edwards describes how the pamphlets were "easily tramported b~' itinerant pcddlers. hawkcd on slreet comers <lnd in ta\'erns. ad\'ertised with jingles amI intriguing title pages, amI swiftly hid­den in a pack or under elothing when the authorities made an appearance,"2; Edwards goes on to explain how the pamphlets were "ideal for circulating a sub\'ersi\T message right under the noses of the opponents of reform,"'" As the pamphlets did not rcqllire <I I;uge im'estmcnt in eithcr 111,l11pO\\'Cr or material as did large manuscripts, they \\'ere inexpensive to produce amI could be turned out quickly to respond illlmediately to the day-to-day battles of the ongoing religions polel11icsY Although precise estimates arc difficult to determine. historian Hans-Joachim Kohler figures that the a\'erage [lug­schriftel1 cost about as Illuch as a hen. or a kilogram of beef-certainly not insignificant. but well within the reach of the pamphlet's intended audience, the "common man," and much less expensi\'e than the cost of a well-crafted parchment manuscript.'s

-,,- MEDIE\'AL TO MODER~

'Ii> reach a wider, mass audience the pamphlets and other publications were printed in the vernacular-the form ibelf a direct clwl1cnge to the Chmch hierarchy whose power rested on performing an intermediary func­tion belween the \'emacular and sacred Lltin scripts. As Edwards points Ollt. printing not only helped spread Luther's message, it "enlbodied" it in its \'e~'

form I1\" presenting challenges to doelrine in the \'emacnlar press. 1Q I.nther's explicit ainl was to Pllt a Bible in e\erv honsehold-an aim tl1<1t W;lS func­tionally complemented by the standardization ami mass production afforded b~' movable type. One printer alone, Hans Lufft, issued 100.000 copies of the Bible within forty years between 15H and 1574. '0 Fehne am] i\lartin cstimate tl1;1t about one million German Bibles were prinlcd before mid­cenhl~•. '1 In so doing. printing helped to nndermine the legitimacy of cen­tralized knowledge reproduction by providing the means "by which each person conld becol\le his or her own theologian."'1 John Ilobbes \note dis­apprO\'ingly how "e\"C~' man, nay. every boy and wench that could read English thought they spoke with Cod AIllligh~', ami understood what lie said."H

Fueled by the new means of comnlllllieation, the Protestant Reformation reached a level of mass support lmprecedented among prior heresies in Europe dming the f\liddle Ages. A "colossal religious propaganda war" en­sned. in Anderson's words, that would soon envelop the whole of Emope.'"' 1\tthe heart of this war were the cheap, mass-prodnced pamph lets emanating from the many printing presses that sprouted throughout Emope in response to the markel created by the religious upheaval. The pamphleteers carefull~'

enlployed a combination of text and illustration to reach as wide an audience as possible. Devastating, "blasphemous" caricatures im'ariably featming per­Icrse and disfigured representations of eminent Church officials rolled off the printing press in dro\'es-an often neglected historical delail of the si\teenth-eentu~' religious propaganda wars made possible b~' the printing press. lI

Bllt, a skeptic might ask, what about the low literac~' rates in early modern Emope;> How much weight should we gh'e to the printing press when the clbility to read am] \nite was still out of reach for the vast majority of people? \lthough literacy was still relativelv low among most of the lower classes, the spread of the printed word worked in tandem with traditional means of '>ral communications in what Kohler calls a "two-step" communications pro­:ess.'~ Evangelical preachers spread by word of mouth polemical works rreshly issued and/or smuggled in from the I\lany printing houses that served

dDistributional Changes

as "nenc centers." \\'e shonld not nm!erestimate, therefore, the extent to which the illiterate cOllld h;l\T acc('ss to the printed \\"lmlthrongh those that could read. So \\·hile the Reformation was \TrY much an owl process at a mass Ie\el. it \\'as the \';lSt distribntion of printed material that fneled the process at the erItci;11 elite 1e\c1.'- 1\ loreo"er. Prolcstantisnl deliberately in­culcated in its followers the importance of literacy and Bible reading, ami as ;1 ('omeqllenee litcr;lC~ rates I;rew markedh' higher O\cr tinn: ill Prolestant

versus Catholic regions." While the printing el1\ironment ma~' have f'l\"ored the strategic interests

of Protestantism, it worked against those of the Roman Catholic Chmeh. Gi\"Cn its exploitation of the printing press, Protestantism was able to take the eark offemi\c in the polemiC<11 stmgg1cs, with ROl\le oftell being forced to take the some\dwt desperalc amI futile position of opposing alld contaill­ing prillt ill the name of doclrine. ,\mlerson affirms that the reformers were "always fundamentall~' on the offensi\e. precisely because lthey] knew how to m;lke IISC of the expalldinE; \TIII<lClllar print-nwrket being created by cap­italism, while the Connter-Reform,ltion defemled the citadel of I,at;n:"" Thlls it \\as Ronle which felt the need to formnlate the Index l,i!Jrorll1ll Prolrihilorllm of banned prinlcd 1I1<1lcria1.'" I\S Eisenstein notes:

Catholic policies framed at Trent were aimed at holding these new functions in check. By reiecling \'erIWC11lar \TrsioTls of the Bible, by stressing la\· obedience and imposing restrictions on lay reading. by de\Tloping new maehinel\' such ,lS the Index and Imprimatur to chan­nel the (low of likratme along narrowly prescribed lines. the post­Tridentine papae\' prO\n) to be an\"lhing but aecomlllodating. It as­sumed ,m unyielding post me that gre\\' e\Tlmore rigid over the course

of time.""

The Index. continuollsly npdalcd throllgllOllt the sixteenth eentmy and beyond. had the ironic effect of spmring a markct for the printed material contained therein by makillg it appc;lI taboo. ami thus e\'enlllore allraeti\"C ."'1 Even prior to the Protestant Reformation the Church had issued decrees forbidding the printing of books unauthorized by the Papal hierarchy. In 1515 Pope Leo X issued an edict to the Holy Roman Empire "that no license should be gi\'en for the printing of a book until it had been examined and apprO\'ed by an authorized representati\'e of the Chureh."",1 By restricting the publication of unauthorized printed lnaterial ill this way. hO\\c\Tr, the

\11': 1111': \',,1. TO \I01ll-: H:\7'f

Chmch's strictmcs crcatcd a lar£;c black-market book tradc fcd bv printing

prcsscs houscd in nOll-Catholic rc£;ions. H It also rcsulted in slron~ prcssmcs

from Catholic printers who were placed at a severe disalhantage Iw not being

;lhlc to cnter into the newly elncrging market for printed malcrial-espe­

cialh· thc m,llcrial forhidden hy the Chmch. For example, in 1;24 the prin­

ters of Leipzig petitioned their Catholic duke that they \\'ere in danger of

losing "house, home, ami all their li\'ClillOod" bccause they were not allO\\Td

to "print or sell ,1I1ything new that is nwde in \\'illcnhcrg or else\\'here. For

that which one would gladly sell and for which there is demand: they said,

referring to the Protestant liter<1lme, "they arc not ,IIIO\\Td to ha\'e or sell.

But \\'h;lt thc\' h;l\'C in ahundance," referring to Catholic lilcratmc, "is de­

sircd hy no one amI cannot be gi\'en away."4' In short. the Church's strategic

intercsts clashed \\'ith the propertics of the newly emerging eonn11lmicatiol1S

cl1\'i rollment.

The way these religious divisions spilled O\'er into the secular parts of the

Christian Commonwe,llth is well-known. Their imp,lct on the architectme

of medieval world order-in particular. the transnational hegemony of the

Rom,m Catholic Church -was dC\.1st'lting. Soon much of Emope was di­

\'idcd into competing religious territories-,I chasm that initially corre­

sponded with pro- and anti-print factions. As Anderson explains, "nothing

gives a beller sel1Se of this siege mentality th,1I1 Fran~'ois l's panicked 1;3; h;m on thc printing of anr hooks in his realm-on p,lin of death hy hang­

ing."46 The Protestant Reformation ripped into the increasingly tenuous cos­

mological bind that held Christendomtogclher under;1 single society. While

it is cert;linh- truc that the roots of the Protestant Reformation reach back

hefore the lle\'e1opment of printing, it is unlikely that it would ha\e been as

profoundly consequential in this regard without the change in the com­

munications environment. One need only look at the fate of pre\'ious her­

esies, like the Hussite, that withered \\'ithout the a\'ailability of printing,

Printing helped to displace "the mediating and intercessionar)' role of the

e1ergv, and C\Tn of the Chmeh itself, by prO\'iding a ne\\' channel of com­

nllmication linking Christians to their God."r In conjunction with indi\'id­

ualistic push of Protestant ideology, printing weakened the intermediary

function that had huttressed the privileged social position assumed by the

e1ergy. While Protestantism presented a frontal assault on the religious core

of the official Church cosmology, a second discernihle social force was grad­

ually underculling it from a more holistic perspecti\e.

Distributiollal Challges 7,

Sc;cntific HrJIIHl/I;SIII

;\5 ;\nderson and others point out. the early printers represented one of

thc first manifestations in Europe of groups of commercial entreprenems

dedicated to making a profit.4' COl1Sequently, they were primarily concemed

\\'ith finding markets for their hooks amI printed materials. Once the market

for religious pamphlets hecame satmated, hooksellers needed to find alter­

nati\'e outlets for their products. One particular emerging social group yeam­

ing for mass-produced printed material at the time was the scientific hu­

manist mO\ement. O\'Cr the eomse of the first centmy of printing, a shift

occmrcd in the conlcnt froln primarily I.atin-based rcli~ious themcs to sci­

entific hnmanist works \\'rillen in \'Cmacular languages.4'1 Like the expansion

of Protes!;1I1tism, thc growth of scientific humanism helped to undermine

the anthoritv of the Roman Catholic Chmch by direetly c1wllenging the

cosmology upon which its authority rested. And also like Protestant groups,

social forces in famr of scientific Inmwnism nomished in the newly emerg­

ing communications em·ironment.

Althongh modemist histories of science have tended to portray the emer­

genlT of the so-called "Scientific Remlution" as a sharp historical jnnctme

\\'hen the fellers of religious false consciousness were thrown aside for the

wisdom of pme empiricism hya few path-breaking individuals, the roots of

scientific humanism as a social force can achwlh- be traced back to the late

~liddle ;\ges.''' In Ital~' and in northern Emope, the growth of universities,

coupled \\'ith a more hospitable mban setting, furnished the grounds for a

stin1l1Iati1H; intellectual e1l\'ironment characterized by intense debates sm­

rounding the rediscO\'er~' of classical Greek and Roman texts.;) At the same

time, latent in European society \\'as a grO\\'ing dissatisfaction with the pre­

vailing cosmology for more practical, secular reasons. The Ptolemaic, earth­

centered picture of the uni\'erse, supported hy official Chmch doctrine, 110

longer seemed adequate, for example, to the imperatives of ocean na\'iga­

tion. which \\'as assuming a more important place as connnerce and trade

expanded. Nor could it be easily squared \\'ith observations of the heavens

made with the aid of ne\\' technical discO\uies - foremost among them the

telescope -that furthered skepticism about its core assumptions.'" Prior to

printing, beliefs that contradicted the official Church cosmology could he

contained with relati\'e success through the same hasic mechanisms, such

as the Inquisition, that held other religious heresies in check. After printing,

77 "~(I ;\11'.1111" \ ,\1. I () ;\IOIlI-.IC',

11Il\\e\'(~r, it hccallle much more difficult for thc Church to halt the flow of 'hc n{'\\' scicllcc. cspcci;lll~' since sciclllific 11I1IIIallism (like Protesiantisllll Iwd a strategic illterest in the widespread disseminatioll of knowledge and illforlllation-all illtcrest that overlapped with that of tlte new printing in­dllSll\,

'(il ullderstallllthe "fitlless" between scientific hUlllallislTl alllithe print­illg cllvirolllllCllt, we lIeed to look hack prior to the ill\'l'ntion of prillting: to the est,lhlishment of nni\'ersities in the High i\liddle Ages. As outlilled ill the pre\'ious chapter, the swe II iIIg lIum bers of students and professors in the I ligh to lall' l\liddle Ages created a markct for hooks that spurred on the development of "in-house" uni\'Crsity m,lIl11script eop\'ing ccnters that \\cre not formally tied to the monastic network. This market might ha\'e relllained limited, howcver, were it not for the introductiOlI of a new sci­encc - animatcd mostly by redisc()\'Cred Aristotelian works - that gradually refocused intellectual energy on "obsel"\'ation" and critical comparison of obsen'ations as opposed to pure reAection on traditional wisdom that char­acterized the predominant neoplatonism of the day. q Although the new "empiricists" propagated the myth that they were "turtling away" from the dnsty parchment books of the Church Fathers to "pure" examinations of the "Book of Nature:' we should cautiousl~' amid treating tlte myth, as Eisenstein suggests, as anything more than a metaphor for the break from religious ties. q In facl. the printing press significantly fueled the sudden Wa\'e of scientific illnO\'ation that characterized the sixteellth ami seventeenth cen­hlries by facilitating the rapid dissemination alld exchange of knowledge and ideas. Contrary to myths, the new science was eriticalh- dependent on the printed word.

While it is true that the entire printed output contained as much chaff as wheat (early modern counterparts to the "trash" tele\'ision of today) the sheer \'()Iume of printed material that could be accessed b~' a single individ­u;II, or groups working cooperatively on a single project, was truly re\'olu­Iionary, especially as it converged with the interests of the new scientific curiosity. Eisenstein argues that while:

the duplication in print of extant scribal maps and ancient geograph­ical treatises, even while seeming to prO\'ide e\'idence of "backsliding," also provided a basis for unprecedented advance.... Before the out­lines of a comprehensive and uniform world picture could emerge,

UlslnhullOllal Changes

incolIgruollS imal;cs had to hc dllplicated in sufficicnt quantities to be hrollght into contlet. cOlllpared, alld cotllraslcd."

ThllS it was not III1COllllllon to find, as Febnc allll l\,lartin poillt ont, Illany cxamples of prin!cd IIIa!crial that furthcred Inedie\'a\. PtolcJnaie lhe­ories attlte same timc as the lIew scicnces. ;(, But what was revolutioll<Jry was tltc cOlljullction of a ncw ill!cllcctual mind-sci alollgside thc slldden aIIII dramatic increase in the sheer \'(Ilume of circulating works. COlltradictions became morc difficlllt to reconcile once Arabists were set alongside Ga­lenists or .\ristotelialls al;aimtl'tolcmaists ill cI sillgle .slud)'.;­

There were other \\'a~'s, beyond benefiting from the sheer \'olullle of cir­elll<lting materia\. in which scientific hUlllanism fit the printillg environ­ment. Consider. in this rcspecl.ltow innO\'atiollS new to print-such as cross­referencing and illllexing - functionally IIIa!ched an intellectnal interest in the s\stematie comparison allll critical e\'aluation of kllowledge that char­acterized the ncw science." The printing environment favored the espril de srsleme of the age-the desire to catalogue and organize every topic into a eOllSistent order- b~' permitting the usc of new devices like pagination, sec­tion hreaks, rtlnning headers, title pages, index cards, standardized copies, and so forth, that would he \'irhwlly impossihle (or at least very difficnlt) 10

undertake without mechanized reprodnction.;'1 ~Iore suhtle forms of "fitness" can he found as well. Comider the w,ly

the new sciences' stress on detached anah-tical, "impersonal" moues of re­Aection aIIII reasoning henehted hv thc mo\'(' away from the oraltr<1llSmis­sion of ideas, to illlli\'idnalized stuch- of standardized texts.("' Or cOllSider the way the idea of progress ,md clmlulation of knowledge was encouraged hy the duplicati\T powers of printing, by the sudden increase in the volume of circulated material, and by the wav cross-referencing and indexing could facilitate the "building" and s\nthesizing of existing theories. Multiple re­prints and IlInllbered editiollS made possihle a process of critical feedhack whereby errors and omissions in an original text could be identified allll corrected in subsequent editions.~1 By contrast, manuscript deterioration was a constant problem in medie\'al Europe such Ihat enormous energy was channeled into the presen'ation and recopying of important texts while countless others were allowed to drift into obli\·ion. Lack of standardization, localized chronologies, imprecise cataloguing, and oral transmissions can all be seen as further constraints on the idea of progress and the eU111ulation

79 7;') ~I E III Jo: L\ "I () M () Ill'; R:'oj

of knOldedge. \\'ith printing. hm\"(',·er. preseryation became lIIuch less of a Clll1(TrJl sillcc nllllliplc copies cOllld he- made al diminishinl,; cmls. AIHllhc e-xchan~e and circnlation of standardized texts fm'ored the notion of a pro­gressi"e acellll1l1lation of ever more accurate ideas. Rice elaborates:

Printing ga"e scholars all m'er Europe identical texts to work on. Re­ferring precisely 10 a particular word in a particular line OIl a p,Jrticular page-, a scholar in Basel could propose an ell1endation which cOllid be Ii1pidl~' checked by his colleagues in Rome or Florence. From such correetions and discoveries a critical edition would emerge, to he su­perse-ded hy anolher aIHI yet another until something ,Ipproaching a standard text had been achieved.h2

The idea that civilization was progressing away frolll error through the winnowing away of false or distorted theories "fits~ a eommlnlications em'i­ronment where printed material (if not "knowledge ~ per se) was dsihly amI quite literally accumulatillg.6l

Like the Reformation, the secularization of knowledge and learning that e11Sued worked ag,linst Rome's controlled interpretation of Ihe order of things, gradually m'erturning the medieval cosmolo~' upon which Papal authori'" deri"ed ils legitimacy. The new communications environment "fa­mre-d~ Ihe- inlerests oflhese two social forces to the disa(h'anlage of the papal­monastic information network. As shown in the pre"ious chapter, this net­work was critical in nwintaining the Church's transnational hegemon~' O\'er mnch of we-stem I':urope and t1ll1S of the ideological foundation of the me­clieval world order. Working in tandem with .the ideas and interests of the Protestant Reformation and scientific humanism, printing helped to under­2ut the intermediary and privileged function of the c1er~' in medie"al so­~ie~·. opening up the reproduction of knowledge to commercial, secular IHinters "'hose main concern was nut the dissemination of a particular re­Iigious cosmology, but rather the accumulation of profit. As Curran attests:

The de"e1opment of a lay scribal and print culture alsu undermined the ideological ascendancy of the Church. The growth of commercial scriptoria and subsequently commercial printing enterprises made it more difficult for the ecclesiastical authorities, ',",10 had pre"iously directly controlled the means of book production, to exercise effective censorship. The failure of the Church to maintain its domination m'er

Distributional Changes

centres of Icarning in the laler Iniddle ages also weukened its grip OIl

Ihe conlcnt of elite culll1le.'·'

\\'hile the Roman Catholic Church worked frantically to control the new mode of conlllllmication IIHollgh ce11Sorship and patronage, it was mwhlc to slem Ihe tide of unforeseen consequellces that wcre ushered in with the inlroduction ofprinling-a tccl1l10IlJg" il had itselfinitiallyapplamled. With the de,-clop1l1cnl of printing, the Chl1lch's dOll1inant place in l1lcdieval world order collapsed. The remainder of Ihis chapter ex,lI11ines the way thc new Inode of con1l11unicalion f,lcilit<ltcd Ille rise of soci,11 furces that helpcd

conslilllle the n1Odell1 world order.

The Nc\y i'dedi;l Em'ironmcnt ;lnd the Constitution of the

i\ lodern Order

Two social forces "hose interests converged were critical in the consti­tution uf the modem world urder in Europe. One was the emergence uf an urbcl1/ bourgeoisie conllnilled to conlmercial exchange, contractllal sucio­economic relations, and capitalist entrepreneurship. The emergence of this particular social force hud wlwl we nlight call a "levcliug" effcct on the talll,;led parliclIlarisllls of fcnclal social relations, opcning up the possihility of comnlOn rule from a single center. The IIlere pussibility might have re­mained um!e"e1opcd \\'cre it not for the ",tlues that animated this ncw class of cntreprenel1ls. \\'lto shared a eollccli"e interest in somc fonn of ccntrali/.cd rule to satis~' the need for both securi~' and standardization. Cuincidentally, their interests "'ere met b~' centralizing state monarchs, who were willing to pro"ide ratiunalized, bureallcmtic administration of internal affairs in ex­change for financing from the urban hourgcoisie to fight extell1al wars. In this ,,·ay. centralized state bureaucracies-a prilnary feature uf modem \\'orld order-beE,;<1n to emergc frolll the croSS-CUlling, persUlHllized forms of non­

territorial rule characteristic of the feudal era. The literature un the rise uf the modern state in Europe is already well­

de"eloped, and it is not my intention here to provide another historical narrati"e of this process. Debates ha"e raged among theorists m'er whether changes in milita,,' technologies, population growth, or some other combi­nation "'ere the faclors ultimately responsible for the rise of the modern state.6' ;\ h focus in this section is different from these studies. I am not

Ko \I E IJ I E \. A I. TO \10 IJ E R ~

concerned with explaining the roots of the urban bourgeoise ami centralized fOllllS of mit- as ~oci;11 phenonlen;l. lIor why thev forllled ;111 ;111iance \\ ilh each other in some regions but not in others. Rather. my concern is to shO\\· the W,ly the printing environment fa\'ored the interests of these two social forccs where they arose. In doing so. I hope to provide an additional reason for wl1\' the transformation of world order occurred at this particular histor­ica I juncture.

Fro", Ihe Oalh 10 lire COlltnlet

Socioeconomic relations during the Iligh to late ~Iiddle Ages were ehar­,lcterized by feudalism-that is, ,I hierarchy of personalized, croSS-CUlling relationships among vassals and lords."" This form of personalized mle C\ul\-ed out of anciellt Germanic practices in which the oath of allegiance played a central role in maintaining trust and discipline among warriors.6­The oath entailed an act of homage whereby one freeman would suhmit allegiance to another through the ceremonial placing of joined hands be­tween those of the lord, which resulted in a bond of mutual obligation. The eerelllony was highly personal, as evidenced by the bodily gestures of sub­mission often involving a kiss as well as the \'erbal oath and the joined hands. signaling the \'assal's allegiance to the lord "by mouth and hands.-6~ Feu­dalism became the dominant mode of organizing socioeconomic relations following the decline of the Carolingian monarchy in the ninth amI tenth centuries, and declined dramatically around the sixteenth century. It was most fully developed in France ami Germany, and least developed in Italy, where ancient Roman traditions persisted and city life played a more promi­nent role in society.69

Although the oath of allegiance played an important symbolic role in affirming the social bonds between \'assal and lord. it \\'as more than just a s)"lnholic gesture insofar as literacy was indeed rare during the High ~Iiddle

Ages and social rebtiollS were in fact primarily ch,nacterized by oral com­munieations.-Il As Le Goff notes. "the feudal system was a world of gesture and not of the written word."71 The pervasi\'eness of the spoken word in both a practical and a metaphoric sense o\'er all of feudal society is perhaps best illustrated. as Clanchy suggests, by the e\'olution of legal procedure.72 It is evidenced by the fact that prior to the thirteenth century parties were gi\'en notice to appear in law courts not by a writ. but by an oral summons which was puhlicl~' proclaimed by crialores or "criers." Prior to the Widespread use

Distributiollal Challges HI

of wrillen amI printed doculnents. a grcat deal of importancc W;lS placcd 011

pcrsollal. OJal It'slinl11I1\' as opposcd to \Hillcn dllClIIIICllls, which wcrc slill ' considered untmstworth~·. Conseqllentl~'. a pcrSOll wellt before the court to ha\e ;I "hearing,- One unfortunate byproduct was that the deaf and dumb appc;n to ha\'C h;ld 110 Icgal righls ill thirlcenth-century 1':nghllld.7' Wills did not reI\- on wrillen do("\nll('nts hllt rather persons witnessing the tcst;ltor making his bequests "with his OWll nlOnth "; they "saw. werc present. am) hearcl" the trallSaction,-~ Alld of course \\'hat prev;liled in legal procedures \\';lS a mere reAetlion of socictv at large, For example, business was COll­dUeled. e\'en among Iwscent commercial entrepreneurs, hy word of mouth, if not solcl~' hecame of tradition and hahit. then certainly because "docu­ments were bound to he relati\'Cly rare until printing made thcir ;lutolllatic reproduction possible.--' With illiteracy the norm, amI written docu1T1enta­tion rarc. socioeconomic comlllunications in the feud,ll era were over­whelmingl~' oral in nature.

The highly perslJ1wliz,cd owl forlll of rille tl1;1t constituted fcud,d socicty contrihuted to the complex web of cross-cutting and overlapping lord-vassal mutual obligatiollS that reached across the territory of Europe. When agree­ments were reached primaril~' on a pcrsonal basis, it should come as no suprise that the form of those rclatiollShips \'<Hied enof1nollsly from regioJl to region. If we were to assume the perspective of an aspiring capitalist, the feudal e11\'iromnent wOllld appear to he highly constraining. Spruyt de­scribes how:

The legal c1inwte was IInfa\'Ourahle for trade gi\'en the IImlerde\"e1­opment of \Hillen codes. the importance of local ellstomary procced­ings. the lack of instrumentally rational procedures, and the cross­CUlling nature of jurisdictions. Economically, coml11eree suffered from great \'ariation in coinage and in weights and measures and a lack of c1earl~' defined property rights. TrallSaction costs were high.-r,

Since money as we know of it today was virtually nonexistent, feudal financial obligations consisted mostly of barter, or in-kind transfers. 77 Legal affairs were characterized b~' what has been called "banal justice," with each locality assuming its own legal particularities-a situation encouraged by the lack of written laws prior to the thirteenth century in most of Europe with the exception of p;lrts of sOllthem France and Italy.~~ Secular and ecclesi­astical lords llSed their OWII weights amI measures, while many local lords

;')1 MEIlIE\'AI. TO MOilER:\'

minted their own coins-in France alolle there were as 111 a11\' as ,00 minters.-" All of this particularism was closely houlld up with the personal.

ized, Of;11 form of rule inherent in feudalism, which encouraged represen­

tatiolla!, as opposed to abstract, forms of measure, and \'ariation and localism

in socioeconOlllie and legal affairs up until the thirteellth centmy-a point

that will he taken up again in the following section dealillg with nascent stale bureaucracies. 'II

Of cOllrse there were few capitalists in the Ilil;h t\liddle Ages who would

find any problem with what we now cOllsider to be a high degree of ~trans­

action costs: But beginning in the twelfth century, a profoulld economic

transformation took hold resultinl; in what Eric JOIICS calls "the Emopean

t\lir;lele,"'1 From a multiplicity of causes-improvements in agricultural

teelmiques, changes ill climate ;md demographics, the growth of interna­tion;lltrade -economic produeti\'ity rose and grew more cOlJlplex.'~ As Rug-'

gie explaillS, "economic relations became incre"singl~' monetized, and de­

\'dopments in 'invisibles: inclnding the great fairs, shipping, insurance, amI

financial services, fmther lubricated conllllerce and helped to create a

European-wide market:8' Out of this dynamic economic interaction re­

emerged many towlIS that had been dorlllallt since ROlllall times. And within

these towns a new group began to coalesce into a coherent social force: the

burghers or tmm dwellers, or what would later be known as the "urban

bomgeoisie." Spruyt astutely points out how few interests these new towns­

pcople shared with the clergy and fcudallords who tlni\Td on the old insti­tutions:

Thus, coupled with the rise of the towns, a new set of interests and

ideological perspecti\'es emerged with a new set of demands, The feu­

dal order- based on cross-cutting jmisdietions and on ill-defined prop­

erty rights and judicial procedures-did not fit the burghers' mercan­

tile pursuits, t\I<nket exchange ;l11d trade required abstract cOlltractual obligations with money as a medium,84

The ideological perspectives and new set of demands to which Spru)'t

refers Aourished as the communications em'ironment began to change. first

with the growth of literacy and the use of written records in the urban centers

of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, and then more dramatically and

forcefully with the spread of printing. In fact, one might go so far as to say

tl1<lt the growth of the mban bourgeoisie and the spread of printing worked

Distributional Changes 15,

sp"b;ol;Ccll/\', with each spnrrillg on the de\Tlopmcnt of the other. So while

Anderson is correclto point onlthat capit;llism sci the preconditions for the

widespread dissemination of printed material, the relatiollship bctween the

two is not so eas~' to disentangle as each, in tum, affected the other." For

the rise of capitalism was t'Inbedded in, alltl closely illtertwined with, a

correspondin~ tramformation in the western European mode of comnlll­

nicalion, In other words. the shift from ;111 oral to a print culture was also a

shift from the Oelill to the roll Irelcl , with all of the cOlISequences for socio­

economic organization that emued. The impersonal bonds of a modern

interdependent ecollOmy-organic. as opposed to mechanical, solidarity in Durkhei1l1's tenns-could not ht, sllStained on such" \'ast Ie\'el wilhollt ;1

high de£;ree of literan' ,111<1 the pemwllency aud reproducibililY of printed

documents.'" "'hile l1<1sc<:nt capitalist entrepreneurs lIIay have found the

oral-m;lI11lscript culture of the late t\liddle Ages to be highly cOllStraining,

the~' thri\Td in the more hospitable printin~ environment. It should cOllie

as no surpri,e, then. that Rice identifies as one of the key f;lclors in "the

astonishingl~' rapid spread of printing" in early modern Europe, the ins<ltia­

ble demand for printed products among "merchants, suhstantial artis<lns,

lawyers. gm'eflmlent officials, doctors, and teachers who lived alld worked

in towllS,"'­

At the 1lI0st fU1Hlalllental be!' printing fanned the widespread lISe of

what might be callcd social cI!>slrclcl;ollS-bills of sale, deeds. court records,

licellSes. contracts. cOllstitutiom. decrees -that arc the essence of modern,

eontractarian societies, These social <lbstractions could only emerge, as Stock

and Clam·ln' point out, \\'ith a rise in gener;llliteracy ;nlt! a corresponding

dependence on wrillen docnlllentatioll O\'er strictI v oral eOll1nlllnicatiollS - a

process that began, as pointed out in the pre\'ious chapter, in the High

Middle Ages but was accelerated with the lIlass rcproducibility of printing.~~

Printing helped circulate in its m"n~' forms a standardized medium of ex­

change essential for the sen'icing of ;1 complcx division of lahor within the

newly emerging urban-commercial centers of western Europe. Consider, in

this respect. the Widespread usc of printed paper currency as opposed to

melal coins or other tokens in facilitating a standardized mediulll of eco­

nomic exehange,'Q Or consider the dependence of the entrepreneur and the

financier on the newspaper, which was an im'ention new to printing.

McKusker and Gra\'esteijn note that "merchants and bankers in the fifteenth

and si"teenth centuries, in their continuing quest for heller ways to speed

the Aow of business news. turned for help to the 1110st recent innovation in

~4 'IEIlIE"-\l, TO MOIlERN

information teclmolog\'. the printing press."'" Thus what might be eonsid­ered tile first forenlliller of the newspaper was a pnblish('(1 exchange ralt' printed at the I.Hm exehalH;e fairs beginning in the late fifteenth century. in which the "con to" or fixed exchallge rate was circulated in print for those allelldillg the fair.Q' The Amsterdam Commodity Price Cnrrent (COl/rs der

Koopl/l(l/lsclrafJpell tot Amsterda1/1 ) was published illtermittently as early as 15X5. ami weekly beginning in 1609:J~ Other cOlnmercial ami financial IIcwspapers sprouted throughollt Emope in the se\'entcenth century. in­cluding in Augsbmg (1592), Bologna (1628). Bolzano (1631). Bordeaux ( 16H). Danzig ( 160S). Florence ( I59S). Genoa ( 1(19). Lille ( 1639). Lisbon (I(JIO), London (160S), L~'ons (1627), Naples (1627). Piacenza (16H),and Verona ( 1631 ),Q' These newspapers served an essential function in pro\'iding a standardized publication for the exchange of c0l11lnerciai information, :\ccording to North and Thomas. the~' ha\'e been found in the archi\'es of e\'et)' important commercial center in Europe,'H Their presence \\'as both an indication of, ,Ind a significant factor in. the rapid growth of mban com­mercial acti\'ity in the se\'enteenth cenftlt)'.

At a more practical Ie\'el. both written and printed materials. and the growth of literacy that lIaturally accompanied them. were indispensahle tools in the day-to-day routines of the urban bourgeoisie, Indeed. standard ac­counting practices and record-keeping. such as double-entry bookkeeping. arc practically inconcei\'able in a purely oral el1\'ironment. While douhle­entr\' bookkeeping emerged in Italy prior to the il1\'ention of printing. it was a prodnet of a high Iy literate urhan populace ami spread rather (Iuickly throughout Emopean urban eellters once printillg and literacy took root elsewhere,QI Nor should it be surprising that more ephemeral qualities as­sociated with the capitalist spirit, such as a meticulous rationalism and an ahstract cogniti\'e orientation. Aourished in precisely those areas where print­iug and literacy initialh- spread the fastest.% As a Illunber of theorists ha\'e argucd. both writing and printiug famr and encourage an abstract, ratioual cogniti\'e orientation by arresting the Aow of oral cOI1\'ersatiou. permitting the comparison and juxtaposition of words and documents. and detaching the content of comn1tmieatiollS from place, time. and personality,Q- Thus in those areas where we find a high rate of literacy and a penetration of printed material, we also find the Aourishing of a highly de\'e!oped commercial ethos,

Perhaps the best example comes from the United Prm'inces of the Neth­erlands, where literacy was high and printing was enthusiastically exploited

Distributional Changes 1)5

ami encoura~ed 1)\, the Protestant state that W;'lS illcorporated thcre in the sixlt'enth <:entm\', NOItl1 anrl Thomas note, for example. how the "Illcthods" of the Dutch merchants lI'ere more sophisticated. amI how the techniques of double-entt)' hookeeping \\'ere \\'idely taught and had hecome standard ;lccOlmtan<:\' pr;lcli<:es."~ Accordillg to Dudley. it is no coincidence tlwt nWl1\' of these defining fe;ltmes of capit;llislll-sueh ;lS the stock exeh;lnge and the nlllltinationa I corpor;ltion-lI'ere origina lIy de\'e1oped in the Neth­crlamls. a region that \las in many ways at the forefronl of the change in the mode of comllllmic;ltion, As J)1H11c~' cxpbil1S:

The remit for Dutch socicl~' lof exploiting print and literacy to their fullest] waS;l deeper penetration of market institutions than had existed in IHe\'iol1S comnlllllities, The examples of the AlIlsterd;lm Exchange Bank amI the Bourse illmtrate this point. The gre;lt popularity that these institutions enjm'ed from the moment the\' were founded could be possible only in a literate socicty familiar with the l1otiol1 that a written document could be just ;lS \'aluable as gold or silver eoins.'l'i

In SUIll, \lhile the clllergcnce of an mban bomgeois class in early 1lI0dem Europe \\';lS the product of a multiplieit~, of factors. the soei;ll 1Il00'CllIent flourished in the new COlll111llllications el1\'ironment. Printing not only func­tion;llly cOlllplelllented llI;lny of the b;lsic routines of the c;lpitalist entrepre­neur. hut more fnndamentally it pro\'ided the me;lns by which soci;ll ;lb­str;lclions could circulate on a \\'ide scale, leading to a cOluplcx di\'ision of labor. \\'itllOut the standardization and mass-reproducibility affordcd by printing. it is unlikel~' that such ;l complex penetration of contractual socio­economic relations could hal'e de\'eloped as it did, Certainly the oral­m;l11l1SCript culture of medie\';ll Emope pl;lccd signific;lnt ohst;lclcs ill the path of capitalist de\'Clopment. Once that el1\'ilOml1ent chal1ged. howe\'er, a complex s~stelll of contr;lclarian socioeconomic rcl'llions began to thri\'C,

The consequences of this particular distribution;ll change for world order transformation arc twofold: First, the growth of ;In urban bomgeoisie had what I earlier called a "b'eling" effect on patterns of political and economic obligation. at least in urban are;lS. cutting through the entangled webs of personal lo~'alties characteristic of the feudal era and opening up the possi­bilit\' for common mle from a single eenter.'(~' As Axtmann explains. "The disintegration of felld;llism at the 'molecular' le\'el of the manor/\'illage re­sulted in the displacement of political-legal power upw;lrds to the 'national'

I',() MEIJIE\' ..\L TO :'-IODERN

bcl."1111

Thus one of the eentraJ features of medie\'al \\'orld order- mnltiple

and O\'Cflapping bn:rs of pcrsollalized ;1\ltllOrit~'-dissoIH:d alllong ,m ill­

crcasingl~' illlportant segment of the popnJation. The oath ga\c wa~' to the

colltract as the h,lSis of earlv modern urban eeollomie relations.

Second. the risc of a bourgeois class directly contrillllled to the celltral­

izing dri\'e of state 1l1Onarchs by providing finances for standin~ armics in

retmll for standardized, wtiOlwl adlllinistr,ltioll of legal ,md comlller<:ial pro­

ccdures within a Icrritorial sp'lce. 111 Manll's words. the lle\\'I~' emerging

capitalists "cnlered and reinforced a world of emergellt warring \-ct diplo­

matically rcgulating states. Their need for, and nllnerahility to. state regu­

1;ltion hoth illlcmally alld geopolitically, ,md the stale's nccd for hll,mces,

pushed classes and states toward a territorialh- centr,llized organization."'OZ

III this respect, the rise of the urban hourgeoisie e,1I1 he scen ,IS a trcl/lsitio/la[ distributiollal change illSofar as it not only helped to dissohc the architecture

of medie\'al world order (specifically. feudal socioeconomic relations). but

it also gave positive impetus to, and \\',IS a eonstituti\'e force in. the e1l1er­

l;ence of modem world order (specifically. the celltralization/st,1I1dardization

of territorial rule from a single center), The following sectioll takes a look

elt this process from the perspective of centralizing state bureaucracies.

The Emergellce of Modem Centralized State Bureal/cracies

As Garrett f\ lattingly has pointed out. precursors 10 the modern state can

lC tr,lced back r.lr into antiquity.1I11 The first bureaucr,lcy arose ill ancient

)nmCri,1 alongside the de\'c1opmcnt of writing. which. as many ha\c noted,

sa necess,lry precondition for its development. 'fH However. the roots of the

egal allll fiscal systems exclusive to modem state bureaucracies in Europe

late from the c1e\cnth and twelfth centuries and. 1I0t surprisingly. were

'Iosel\' bound up with the reestablishment of secular literac~' and the lay

Ise ofwrittell dOClllllellts. 1Il1 Ofcourse, secular literaC\' ,1I1d the usc ofwritten

<:xts wcre not solel~' responsible for the rise of the modern stale. 'lCchnieal

nnO\'ations originating in northern Italian communes-such as administra­

ion by an impersonal salaried bureaucracy serYing for a limited term and

louble-entry bookkeeping-provided important precursors to the form that

tate bureaucracies ultimately took. 10<\ Certain ideas were also influential in

i\'ing birth to st<Jte bureaucracies in Europe-especially the rediscO\cry of

~oman law, which helped fix the notion of a distinct "publie- realm. w And

Distributional Changes 1{7

landmark treatises - such as Richard Vitmeal's Dialogue 011 tire COl/r.se of

the E.\cheqlll'r. written during the reign of II emy II ( 1154 --II WJ)- hdped

to define the impersonal role of the bureaucratic administr;ltor to the state

as an abstmct entity. I'" 1100\"<:\cr. the preeo11(litiom for ccntralized admin­

istratin' rule dcpended not iust on ide;ls. hut '11so. and morc crllcially. on

the technological capacil\' to cam' Ihem ont-a distinC'lh- ahsent fealme of

political authorih· for most nasccnt states in medic\'al Europe.

Aspirinf,: medie\·;llmonarchs fonnd Ihat their mO\'es toward centralization

were difficnlt to slIstain became of the COllSlr;lints of the prcvailing social,

economic. and politic,11 em·ironmcnt which. as ollliined earlicr. was over­

whelmingI\' cOllstituted by personalized, oral conmll1nications. Thus whilc

we find the shells of modern St,ltes beginlling to den'lop as early as the

twelfth <:entury in eoulltries like England. wherc writtcn administration \\'as

more 'l<h-anced. the norm for the rest of Emope was a ('oustant tension

between the forces of localization amI centr'11ization. Onc reason was that

long-range ,1dministration based on networks of personal or blood tics was

ineffectin: for sustaining cross-generational rule. It had;1 tendcncy to dissolvc

into peth' ficfd0111s \vith local pri\ilege-a pattern that \\·as repeated often

throughout the 7\ liddle ;\ges as e\·idenced. for example, hy the dissolution

of the Carolingian a11<1 Ottonian d~'lIasticsY'" I\lcdic\',11 political rule. in

Poggi's \\ords. upossessed an inherent tendency to shift the seat of effective

power. the fnlcrum of rule. do\\'nward toward the lower links in thc chain

of lord-\'assal rel,ltions" -a tendency no doubt related to the prevailing

personalized-oral comn1l1nieations em'ironment of the time. lllI Conse­

quently. the political map of Europe in the f\liddle Ages \\as dctermined,

according/~' to \Iattingly. not so much "b~' geography, or national cultme,

or historic de\'elopment" as it \\·as "b~' the irrelevant accidents of birth and

marriage and death.- III

The complexity In' \\·hieh personalized. cross-cuttiug lord-vassal entan­

glements took root in the I\liddle Ages made allY attenlpts at centralization

and ration;J! ad111inislr,1tion within a terriloriail y defined space extremely

difficult for nascent states. Prior to the rediscO\'ery of Roman Law, there was

no conception of a distinction between private legal and fiscal prerogatives

of local authorities and that of a public realm. In the case of local lords,

"On land under his jurisdiction. public economy and the fiscal obligations

related to it were identical \\·ith the domestic economy of his pri\'ale house­

hold."": Raising consistent state re\·elllles-especially from one generation

1-1( ) ~IEDIE\'''L TO ~IODER:"

1e\,c1."'"1 Thus one of the central fe,ltures of medie\'al world order-multiple aIIII O\Trlapping h~Trs of pcr.son:llil.l,d ;Jnthority-dissoh-ed mnon!; :In in­creasinr;ly important segment of the popubtion, The oath r;a\'e wa~' to the culltreld as the basis of earlv modem urban economic relations,

SecoJ1(I. the rise of a bourgeois class directly contributed to the central­iz.inr; dri\'e of state monarchs by prm'idinr; finances for stamlinr; armies in return for standardized, I<Itional administration of legal ami commercial pro­cedures within a territorial space. In 1\lann\ words, the nc\\'I~' cmcr~ing

capitalists "cntered ami reinforced a world of emergent w,nring \'ct diplo­matically regulating states, Their need for, and nJlnerabilih' to, state regu­lation both intemallyandgeopolitically.amlthe stale's necd for financcs. pushed classes and states toward a territorially centralized orr;anization,"lol In this respcct. the rise of the urban bourgeoisie can be scen as a trelllSitiOlwl

distribntional change insofar as it not only helped to dissoke thc architecture of medieval world order (specifically. feudal socioeconomic relations), but it also gave positive impctus to. and was a eonstitnti\'e forcc in. the elller­genee of modern world order (specifically, the centralization/standardization of territorial rule from a single center), The following section takes a look at this process from the pcrspecti\'e of centralizing state bureaucracics,

The Emergellce of Modem Celltredi:::ed State Bureaucracies

As Garrell rvlallingk has pointed oul, precursors to the modem stale can be traced back f,1I into antiquity.lll' The first bureaucracy arose in ancient Sumcria alongside the de\'(~lopment of writing, which, as mall\' l1a\'c noted, is a necessary precondition for its de\'elopmenl.l'H Hm\,e\'er. the roots of the legal and fiscal systems exclusive to modem state bureaucracies in Europe datc from the ele\'enth and h\'e1fth centuries and. not surprisingly, were closely bound up with the reestablislnnent of secular literacy and the by nse of wrillen documents. In; Of comsc. secular Iitcrac\' and the usc of wrillcn texts were not solely responsible for the rise of the modern state, 'lccllJlical innm'ations originating in northern Italian communes -such as administra­tion by an impersonal salaried bureaucracy sening for a limited term and double-entry bookkeeping-pro\'ided important precursors to the form that state bureaucracies ultimatelv tookY"" Certain ideas \\'ere also inAnelltial in giving birth to state bureaucracies in Europe-especially the rediscO\'ery of Roman law, which helped fix the notion of a distinct "public .. realm.1O" And

liIi

Distributional Changes

landmark trcatiscs-snch ,IS Richard Filzneal's Dialoglle Oil the ( the l':,\C[,Cr[lIcr. written dminl.; the reign of Ilellty II (11,4--11 K9) to dcfine thc impersonal rolc of thc bmcaucratic administrator to as an abstract clltity.'"s Ilo\\'C\'Cr. the prccomlitions for ccntralizc istrati\'C rule dcpcnded 110t ;nst on idcas, lJ11t also, and morc Cnt

the techll010!;ical capacity to carry thcm ont-a distinctly abscnt f political authority for most nascent statcs in medicval Europc.

Aspirin!; mcdic\almon<Hchs found thatthcir mO\'cs toward ccn\' were difficult to sustaill bccamc of the cOl1Straints of tlrc prcvaili' economic, amI political em'ironmeut which, as outlined carlicr, , whelmingly comtituted by pcrsollalizcd, or;11 conu1Hmica!ions, '1'1. we find the shells of modcrn statcs beginning to dcvelop as C,ll' hvclfth ecullm' iu countries like I':ngland, whcrc wrillcn mlminisll more a(h-anced, thc l10rm for thc rest of Europe was a comlall beh\'een the forces of localizalion and centralization, Oue reaSOli

long-range adnIinistralioll based on llct\\'orks of pcrsonal or ble){J( ineffecti\'e for susta ining cross-generationa1rule, It had a tendency tl into peth' ficfdoms with local pri\'ilcgc - a pallcm thai was repca throughoutthc f\liddlc Agcs as c\'idcnced, for cxamplc, by thc di of thc Carolillgiall amI Ollonian dynastics.!"'! Mcdicval politiC<l Poggi's words, "possesscd an inherenttemlency to shift the seat 01 powcr. the fulermll of rn1c. down\\'ard toward the lowcr links in I

of lord-\assal rclatiom" -a temlcncy no donbt rclated to the I persollalizcd-oral C011111ll111icatiollS el1\'irolllncut of thc timc,llII qucntl~, thc political map of Europc ill thc Middle Agcs was dctcl accordingly to f\ lattingly. llot so much "by geography, or national, or historic de\'elopment" as it was "by the irrclevant accidcllts of hi marriagc and dcath,"II)

The complexity h~' which personalized, cross-clll1illg lord-vassal glements took root ill thc 1\liddlc Ages m;1<le any allcmpts at cen!r,ll and rational administration within a territorially dcfincd spacc cxl difficult for llasccnt states. Prior to the rediscO\'CIY of Roman Law, th, no conception of a distinction beh\'een pri\'ate lega1aud fisca 1preH' of local authorities and that of a public realm, In the case of 10c<1: "On land under his jurisdiction, public ceonomy and the fiscal obli· related to it were identical with the domestic economy of his pri\'ate hold,"lll Raising consistent state revenucs-espeeially from one gen'

l"'h) \l1-:1l11-:\',\1. to ~IOIJER:'\

of leaders to the next-was \'irtually impossible as a I\picalll1edie\'al ruler "knew the Iota I of neither his income lIor his outgoings" of his clllire do­main. 111 One consequence of this entangled particularism was that kings who wanled re\TlIlleS from the lands under their jurisdiction regular,," tra\'­eled with a large entourage in order to "COIlSlnne the prodnce of their scat­!cred holdillgs,"II~ And sillce each hOll1mage of lord-\'assal ohligatioll was entcred illto ;lIll1ilu persollae (that is, persollally) the form of rule \'aried enormomly from relationship to relationship .md region to region, Accord­ing to Poggi:

the lord's relationship to the uhilnate ohjects of rule, the populace. \\as medi'lted differently hy each \'assal. The size of the fief. the exact tenns 011 which it was granted, the rights of rule oyer it that remained with the lord or that were yested in the \'assal-as these aspects of the basic relationship varied. so did the modalities and cOlltent of the exercise of ru le. 111

Nonetheless, hy the thirleenth ami fourteenth centuries state authoril\' was undergoing, although with occasional sethacks, a gradual process of consolidation .md eentralization-a kind of "two-steps forward/one-step backw.ml'" proccss. To be sure, the process was not uniform across all of Europe. In Germany and Italy, for example, city-leagues and city-stales pro­yidcd alternative "de-eentered" logics of organiz.llion. But elsewhere - in England, France, and Holland, for example-centralized forms of rule he­gan to displace the feudal system. Theorists dis,lgree on the primary impetus for this process, or why it finally took hold at this juncture rather than at an earlier time. Some, such as Tilly, place more emphasis on changes in mili­tary technologies. 116 Others give as much emphasis to population pressures ami ,m accompanying economic boom. W \Vhate\'er the ultilnate reason, in those areas of Europe a similar pattern can be discerned: In the context of an increasingly dangerous em'ironment, an imperative was placed on the main!cnance of a standing army, and where relc\'ant a war Acct. that could be summoned by a central ruler. 1I8 The new demands of war necessitated that these rulers turn inward to maintain domestic stability and order. and, more imporl;mtly, to find a way to raise constant re\'emles to finance the war machi ne. 11q

Forlunatel~" the state rulers found willing alIies in the urban bourgcoisie, whose interests in order and rational administration com'erged

hl)Distributional Changes

with those of the central rulers, Amllwppih' for these statcs, thc ne\\' tOWI1 Inen \\l'IC ahll' ;lIul \\illin!.; to 11I0\ide nl(lI1('\' in the fornl of la,xes ill e)(challl' for the domestic senices IHO\'ided hy the stale, The specific form tll<1t th relatiollShip took \';Hied froln stale to sblte. as Tilly and i\lann have doci 11ll'11ted. 1:" But in palls of Enropc from tlte fiftccnlh 10 lltc SC\CnICCII centuries. the general phcnomenon of modem stale hureancracics nlld territorialh- di~tiuct. ahsolulist rule began 10 clllergc alld tltrive a~ tltc 11101 1

form of political authority, \\'hat role did the printin!.; clI\'irolnm'nt play in facilitaling the cmcrgC\1

and succcss of ccntralized fornls of mle lJ\'Cr altemali\'e "de-centercd"lo\" of organization? i\ lost importanth-, the printing envirolnnent providcd tools necessan' for sl<mdardized, intergcnerational rule inlhe form of rati bureaucratic ad1l1inistr'ltion froln a singleccnlcr. Indecd, as pointed ahO\'C, a necess'H\' precondition for the emergence of burcaucratic adl istration is some form of writing system. Thus it is not surprising thai de\'Clopmcnt of modcrtl slate burcaueracics in I':lHopc was closely btl up with the spread of secular literacy in the High Middle Ages. So in II regions where litewcy is relatively high, hureancratic sJ>ccializ,ltion an" \'Clopnlcntlcnds 10 bc nlore a(h-;1l1eed, For example, in the Glse of EngL, sixtv indi\'idnals were employed in its Chancery in the middle of tltc I,

teenth cenhtr\': b~ tlte fifteenth ccntlH\', more than a hundred were ployed at the Court of COInmon Pleas alone. III

Of course. pressures for burcaucratization, in turn, dr()\'C secular lill' and a dcmand for standardized cOlmllllllicatiollS. Early printers werc Ii'

to recognize this market amI. as a result, thrivcd 011 slate connnissiOlI printed adlllinistrati\'e records. ,\s Feb\Te and Martin point out, stale poL acti\'eh- encouraged thc creation of large, nalional publishing Ill' throughout earh' modern Europe,I22 And the printed products email;' from these large puhlishing centers ill hun increased the size ofbureauci documentation, which neccssitated yet more specialization and persoll In Gnenee's words, 'Tlte proliferation of offices ami officials incvilabl} to a proliferation of the documents without which State action \\ouk impossihle and on \\hich its power was hased."'"

The 1110st ob\'ious wa\' the new communications em'ironment fan the interests of centralized state rulers was by facilitating more effecti\T systematic rewards amI sanctions in the !.;O\'Crtlance of outlying regions, ' ticularly through the standardization of legal institutions and systems n: reet taxation, As Til"" affirms, "Almost all European gm'ertlments even In

91 l)U "EIlIE\'"'' TO 'IOIJER:-.I

took~teps \\'hiell hOlllogenized their popnlations,-I:~ \\lith lIleans of slan­

cb,dizct! donnnentalion IHll\ided hy printillg, \tate rulers could effecti\'l'h­

cut through and transcend the \'agaries of personalized. feudal obligations

tlwt so often produced discrep'lIleies among loc.lles throughout the I\ing's

dOlllain, III the printing el1\'irolnnent. regularized and impersonal proce­

dures could be more effectively established th'lt did not vary o\'Cr a territo­

riall~' defined sp;lee or, more illlportalltl~', across generations of rule, As all

illustration. "hetween 1665 ami 1690 I.ouis XI\' prolllulg;lted ordinances

and codes that uniformly regulated over all of France such di\'erse matters

as ei\'il and criminal court procedure. the management of forests and ri\'ers.

shipping awl sailing. and the trade in hlack sl;l\'l's,"I:; In the printing el1\i­

ronmen!. re\'elllleS could be collected effieienth- ami eonsistenth- \\'ith the , ,

result that the size and power of the state. and the effeeti\'eness of centralized mle, began to grow,

The state's interest in standardization (or hOll/ogellizatioll, as Till~ aptl~' calls it). was closely bound np with a desire not only to lIIore efficiently and

eonsistenth- extract financial re\'Cnues. but also to maintain dOlllestie order

ami security through surveilLJnce of the population and territory-an inter­

est that thri\'('d with the a\';Jilability of printing, One of the more compelling

interpretations of the state's inlcrest in sltr\Tillanee is 1\ Iiehel Fouca II It's dis­

cussion of the "disciplinarv state,"I:', Foucault argues that in the transition

to the modem state, coercion and O\'ert \iolence as tools for social order

were gradually replaced b\' a more impersonal "micro-politics" of discipline

designed to morally regulate or "normalize" indi\'iduals through institutional

regulation and bureaucratic administration,'2- Though Foucault is more

concerned with the ideas that lay behind this transition. it is easy to see hO\\'

the material instruments of technology at the disposal of centralized state

administrators \\'ere crucial in facilitating this reorientation,l:S

Perh'lps the best example of the way printing helped to empower the

"disciplinary state" is the reproduction of printed llIaps used for administra­

tive purposes, As Barber notes with respect to England. 1)\, the sixteenth

century state ministers "came to expect a greater precision in maps than had

their predecessors. and several became more sophisticated in their e\'alua­

lion of, and their awareness of the potential uses of. maps for gO\'emment:

He goes on to say that the gO\'ernll1ent of the time "seems to ha\'e shO\m a

growing appetite for printed maps. which \\'ere cheaper, increasingly plen­

tiful, and less prone to scribal errors in trallSmission than their manuscript

eounlcrparts,"IN In 1610, a State Paper Office was formalh- established in

Distributional Changes

Fllglam\ to hO\1Se the e\"('r-illcrc;lsillg Illllnber of officialm;lps,'lll I ,ikewi~

Buissclct nolo witll respec! to France: "At Ihc time of I ,ouis XIV's ;lccessir

Fren('11 gO\erninl; circles possessed a \\'ell-de\'eloped seme of the u~

fulness of maps, and there \\ere cartographers capable of respomlillg to tlH

m.'e(k , , , Ithrough I all abuudauce of pre,sses. mostly eoucclllrated iu Pal

capable of printinl; and diffming large maps in comiderable qualltities,"

For example:

For eeonoulic amI financial plallning. In;lps were cOlnmissioned to

shO\\' \\here the \'arious fiscal di\'isions. or gencralitcs, rail. and \\'herc

specific taxcs like lhc gahclle (salt tax) \\Tle 10 bc paid, , , ,Othcr Inaps

\I'ere ordered whell great puhlic works like the caual du rvlidi were

being plauned: this calla) had a \cry rich cartography a\sociatcd with

it. Othcrs, ;I(;ain, \\Trc couunissioued to show the sites of the In;nes

in Frallce. or the (];llure and extent of its f(1 rcsts,112

:\nother e\;lnlple of the \\'a\' the printiug c11\'iromncnt flleled the di~

plinarv state \\as ill the area of public cducation. as Luke in particular I,

ShOWlI,lll Comider in this respect thc \\'a~' thc printiug ell\'iromneut fan)[

standardized public "exam illations" through \\'hich each im1i\'idual "

compelled to pass, helping to create .1 clnnulati\'C, imli\'idual "archive"

persons undcr the slate, Lnkc notes hO\\ "Printing euabled the 'power

\Hiting' to beco(l1e uni\Trsalized and standardized; teachers like waHIt

examined. e\'aluated. recorded. amI describcd those in their charge acco:

ing to standardizcd (administrali\T) forms bascd on underlying c1assi fical!

eriteria: 11• These standardized. printed exal11in;ltions helped to instill a sel

of rank in the population \\'hich, as Foucault describes, defined "the gr'

fOrln of distribution of indi\'idnals in the education order. , , , an alignnH

of age groups. one after another; a succession of subjects tanght and <\\1 tions treated, , :111 In this \\';1\', standardized Jlnblic cdncatioll ill the f()l

of printed school textbooks and prillted school ordinanccs sen'ed the di~

plinary interests of the state. \\'hieh promoted a uniformity of belief an1(1

the population th rough compu Isory schooling of the young,l 'r,

In Slll1l. the 11l00'elllent to\\'ard 11l0dern state bureaucracies, which beg

in the High ;-.. Iiddle Ages. was fa\'Ored by the change in the mode of co

munieation. first \\'ith the gradual increase in secular literacy and then, me

dramatically. \\ith the introductioll of printing, Printing fueled the stratl'l

interests of nascent centralized state bureaucracies by prm'idillg the me;1

93 l}2 \IFI>IE\',\I, 1'0 \I(lIJFR~

In' whith stmdardized docu1l1ents-from school texthooks. to public ordi­nalllTS alld fistal rcgnlaliom. to II1;)PS of thc rcalnl-could bc Inass rcplO­duccd allll disscminated. In this wa~'. printin~ prm'ided the tools 1)\, which celltralizin~ rulers could promote homogenous policies across territorialk dcfincd spaccs allllthus dissoln' the cross-cullillg allll mTrlapping iurisdic­tio11S tharactcristie of the medie\'al world order. As printin~ prm'ided a 1I1c,n1S to mass-reproduce documellts at lillie cost. a s~'stem of intergellera­tiollal rille conld be cstablislled. thus freczing thc tendenc\' that had bccn repeated th rough out the ~ Iiddle Ages for centra Iized ru Ie to wit her followi IIg the dealh of inAuential personalities, ~loreO\'Cr. altemati\'C forms of extant politital authority that lackcd a single. celltered form of mle-the Italiall city-states ,md the German cit\'-Ieagues. for ex;nnple -could not bellefit from lhe printillg ell\'ir0l1l11cllt to the same extent as did centralized state burc;nlcracies, P- As a result. the succcss of thc centralized state bureaucratic s~'stem of rule became the model of political authorih' for modern Europe as "'hole.

In this chapter I ha\'e dcscribcd ho\\' the illtroduction of printing ill me­die\'al Europe brollght about specific distributional changes that e1l1powered eert;lin aelors and social forces at the expense of others. ~ lost immediatek affected by the alkent of printing was the transnational autllOril\' of thc Roman Catholic Church. which had C01l1e close to establishing a theocratic papal go\'ernment o\'er much of western Ellrope in the High ~ liddle Ages based on a 1I1onopoly of the reprodllction of knowledge. The Church's pre­elllineni positioll in medie\al world order was undercut by forces ",hose strategic interests coincided with, and were augmented b\', the alhent of prinling-the Protestant Reformation and scientific hunwnisnl. The new communic;ltions c11\iron1l1ent fm'ored the interests of thesc two social fortes by permilling the mass reproduelion and Widespread transmission of ideas outside of the papal-monastic nctwork. The Church's interests. on the other hand, were significantly disalhantaged b~' the change in the mode of com­Inunication. as e\'idenced 1)\, its explicit condenmation of the printing press once its fllll potential had been unleashed.

The chapter also explored the wa\' in which distributional changes as­sociated with printing helped facilitate constituti\e features of modern world order: specifically. contractarian socioeconomic relations among the new

Distributional Changes

urban bourgcoisic. and modcrn statc burcallcracics, Thc prinling cll\'iroll mCllt fa\orcd thc dcmallds of cOlltraclariall socioctollonlic rclaliom by PCI

milling the widcspread llSe of social abstracliollS crucial to 1l1Odern, inlcr dependent Cl'OIlOlnies, This particular social force was \'ital to till dc\'Clopmcnt of modcrn political rule imof;u as its illtcrcsts in stalldardil:1 tion ami ordcr tOl1\Tr~ed with thosc of ccntralizing state monarths, "Il( \\Tre willing to prm'idc dOlllcstic stabi1it~, in t'\changc for the ability 10 extral' rC\TI1\ICS tllfollf;h Iaxcs, Thc capabilitics of printillf;-cspccially thc Ilia, reproduction of standardizcd doculncllts-:r!so cmpowcrcd tire disciplina, state. which had a \Tsted interest in both thc homogenizatioll of the pOpl1 lation and the stalldardizatioll of adlllinistralion, Althollf;h Ihcsc distrilJII tional thanges \\'Cre crncial in the mcdie\'al-to-moderll trallsformatioll (' world ordcr. thc\' do not tell the whole story, The nt'\t chaptcr cxplorcs th, rclatiol1Ship bCl\HTII thc challge ill thc Inodc of COlllllllll1ication alld I'"~

transformation of social epistemology,