13

Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This opinion holds that a landlord who wins the right to demolish a rent stabilized building must, after all appeals are exhausted, continue to comply with any obligation to offer to relocate the tenants. The landlord had refused to offer relocation after the tenant decided to appeal.Mr. Peckham was represented by Timothy Collins of the law firm of Collins, Dobkin & Miller LLPChelsea Partners was represented by Ed Baer of Belkin, Burden, Wenig & Goldman LLP

Citation preview

Page 1: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 2: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 3: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 4: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 5: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 6: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 7: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 8: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 9: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 10: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 11: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 12: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)
Page 13: Decision (Chelsea Partners v. Peckham)