14
T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan -06 1 DC2 IRF Status DC2 IRF Status Meeting agenda, references at: http://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/DC2/060127 Event Classes - Julie Refine Bill’s cuts to two exclusive event classes: A and B! Limit cos()< -0.4 (66 degrees) Effective area - Jean Binning: cos()=0.05 (20 bins) and log 10 (E)=0.2 bins (5/decade, 20 bins) Finds no discontinuities Request special data at =0 and for E<100 MeV Dispersion – Riccardo Preliminary study front vs. back, event classes 1,2,3 Issue of asymmetric response (tail to low energy) – tentative decision to ignore PSF – Toby Study of event classes A and B, front and back Binning: cos()=0.1 (8 bins), log 10 (E)=0.5 (2/decade, 8 bins) Good fits to the standard 2-parameter function (at least for class A) Request more data at low energies

DC2 IRF Status

  • Upload
    avian

  • View
    48

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DC2 IRF Status. Meeting agenda, references at: http://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/DC2/060127 Event Classes - Julie Refine Bill’s cuts to two exclusive event classes: A and B! Limit cos()< -0.4 (66 degrees) Effective area - Jean - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 1

DC2 IRF StatusDC2 IRF Status

Meeting agenda, references at: http://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/DC2/060127

Event Classes - Julie Refine Bill’s cuts to two exclusive event classes: A and B!

Limit cos()< -0.4 (66 degrees)

Effective area - JeanBinning: cos()=0.05 (20 bins) and log10(E)=0.2 bins (5/decade, 20 bins)

Finds no discontinuities

Request special data at =0 and for E<100 MeV

Dispersion – RiccardoPreliminary study front vs. back, event classes 1,2,3

Issue of asymmetric response (tail to low energy) – tentative decision to ignore

PSF – TobyStudy of event classes A and B, front and back

Binning: cos()=0.1 (8 bins), log10(E)=0.5 (2/decade, 8 bins)

Good fits to the standard 2-parameter function (at least for class A)

Request more data at low energies

Page 2: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 2

The calibration dataThe calibration data

Photon response from “allgamma”Version v7r3p4, with reprocess to update CTB variables

(4000-2)*50 K generated events into 6 m2:uniformly in log(E) from 16 MeV to 160 GeV (4 decades)

uniform in cos() from -1 to 0 (upper LAT hemisphere)

BackgroundVersion v7r3p5, also CTB updated, and filtered with CTBGAM>0

18675 seconds of live time, distributed uniformly over 3 days of the DC2 orbit

Page 3: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 3

Cuts (Julie)Cuts (Julie)

New cuts from Bill to address:high energy electronssuspect topology: track 2 start not consistent with track 1heavy ions sneak up our skirt

Two classes: CTB cuts are,A: CTBCORE>0.35 and CTBBestEnergyProb>0.35 and CTBGAM>0.50

B: not(A) and CTBCORE>0.1 and CTBBestEnergyProb>0.1 and CTBGAM>0.35

class A

A or B

Reference: DC2Cuts.C athttp://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/DC2/Trigger+and+Filter+settings+and+Event+classes

cut

McZDir

class A

Page 4: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 4

How is the background?How is the background?

Julie: using special extra-galactic run

Toby: use spectrum with acceptance

class A

Page 5: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 5

Effective Area (Jean)Effective Area (Jean)

Presented a unique way to measure the effective area: plot the distance in log10E between one event and its nth follower, after ordering the events by increasing E. This is inversely proportional to the effective area.

Concern that =0 is a singular point, which requires special data to study.

Proposes a special run with a hard, E-3

spectrum to emphasize low energies

Proposed output formant, including a OGIP* document for file format.

*http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/ofwg/docs/summary/ogip_92_007_summary.html

Page 6: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 6

Dispersion: tale of a tailDispersion: tale of a tail

cyan: class A

Page 7: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 7

Dispersion, contDispersion, cont

Note that the CTBBestEnergyProb cut can be made more severe without a large effect: an issue for future study.

class A cut

Page 8: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 8

Ricardo’s gaussian fits: energy Ricardo’s gaussian fits: energy dependencedependence

10% is what we have been using for the science tools checkouts

Page 9: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 9

Riccardo: angular dependenceRiccardo: angular dependence

Page 10: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 10

PSF (Toby)PSF (Toby)

The function:

8 bins in energy (2/decade), 8 in cos() (0.1)

Two classes so far differ in CTBCORE cut. also (front/back)A: GoodEvent3;C: GoodEvent1 && ! GoodEvent3;

Apply scaling function of energy to angular deviations to make the fit values for approximately 1. (The “Atwood function)

Objective: to find reasonable parametric representation in E and cos of and

2

211 112,;

1

d

dN

N

Page 11: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 11

Fits to the functionFits to the function

8 bins in energy (2/decade), 8 in cos() (0.1)

Two classes so far differ in CTBCORE cut. also (front/back)A: GoodEvent3;C: GoodEvent1 && ! GoodEvent3;

Apply scaling function of energy to make fit values for approximately 1.

Stop fit at 10 (scaled) sigma, will apply different exponent

Page 12: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 12

Example PSF fits at the “sweet spot”Example PSF fits at the “sweet spot”

class A class B

dens

ity

dens

ity

Page 13: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 13

Relate to the integral distributionsRelate to the integral distributions

Function predicts too-large tail above 95%: is this a problem?

Page 14: DC2 IRF Status

T. Burnett: IRF status 30-Jan-06 14

Front section:Front section:Angular dependence at 3 GeV, Angular dependence at 3 GeV, energy dependence for ~normalenergy dependence for ~normal

3 GeV PSF vs cos(theta)

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

-1.00 -0.90 -0.80 -0.70 -0.60 -0.50 -0.40 -0.30 -0.20

cos(theta)

sigma (A)

gamma (A)

sigma (class C)

gamma( class C)

normal PSF vs energyFront Section

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

10 100 1000 10000 100000

Energy (MeV)

sigma (A)

gamma (A)