DAFTAR PUSTAKA - core.ac.uk · Setelah mendengar penjelasan dan diberi kesempatan untuk mengajukan pertanyaan-pertanyaan mengenai tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan resiko

41

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Petersen, PE, Yamamoto T.Improving the oral health of older people:

the approach of the WHO global oral health programme. Community

Dent Oral Epidemial.2005;33:81-92

2. Martono, H., 2008, Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Lanjut Usia,

Gemari, Juni 2008, Tahun XI, edisi 89, h.66

3. Departemen Kesehatan RI, 2001, Pedoman Pembinaan Kesehatan

Usia Lanjut bagi Petugas Kesehatan, ed 5, Jakarta.

4. Martono, H., 2008, Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Lanjut Usia,

Gemari, Juni 2008, Tahun XI, edisi 89, h.66

5. Nugroho, W., 2008, Keperawatan Gerontik dan Geriatik, ed 3, EGC,

Jakarta, h 02.

6. Papas AS. Geriatric Dentistry, Aging and Oral Health. CV Mosby. St

Louis. 1991. p: 71-3

7. Agtini MD. Presentase pengguna protesa di Indonesia. Media Litbang

Kesehatan. 2010; 2. P: 50-58.

8. McMillan AS, Wong MCM. Emotional Effects of Tooth Loss in

Community-Dwelling Elderly People in Hong Kong.Int J Prosthodont.

2004; 17: 172-76

9. John MT et al. Demographic Factor, Denture Status and Oral Health-

Related Quality of life. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32: 125-32.

10. Anonim, 2004, Access to Dental Care In Australia, Australian Dental

Journal., Vol.49 (4) p.206-208.

11. World Health Organization. WHOoQL : Measuring Quality of Life.

Swizerland: World Health Organization; 1997.p.1-4.

12. Barnes IE. Perawatan Gigi Terpadu untuk lansia Ggerodontology).

Butterworth Heinemann Ltd. 1994. p: 26-41.

42

13. Freeman, R., 1999, The Psychology of Dental Patient Care : Barriers

to Accessing Dental Care : Patient Factor, British Dental Journal.,

Vol.187 p.141-144

14. Caglayan, F,. Altun, O., Miloglu, O., Kaya, M., dan Yilmaz, A., 2009,

Correlation Between Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHQoL) and

Oral Disorders in a Turkish Patient Population, Med Oral Patol Oral

Cir Buccal,14(11):573-578,

http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i11/medoralv14i11p5

73,pdf, 21/01/14

15. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2003, Pedoman Tata

Laksana Gizi Usia Lanjut untuk Tenaga Kesehatan, Direktorat Gizi

Masyarakat Direktorat Bina Kesehatan Masyarakat, Jakarta.

16. Rutkauskas JS Clinical Dicision Making in Geriatric Dentistry. The

Dental Clinics of North America. 1997;41. P:658.

17. Bianco VC, Rubo JH. Aging, Oral Health and Quality of Life.

Periodontal Disease – A Clinician’s Guide 2010. P: 357-68.

18. Greenberg MS. Butket’s Oral Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment, BC

Decker Inc. 10 ed.2003. p:613-17.

19. Tumer DT, Ship JA, Dry Mouth and its Effect on The Oral Health of

Elderly People, J.Am Dent Assoct. 2007; 138 :15S-20S.

20. Musacchio E et al. Tooth Loss in the Eldery and its Association with

Nutritional Status, Socio-economic and Lifestyle Factors. Acta

Odontologica Scandinavica. 2007 ; 65 : 78-86.

21. Ahmad SF. An Insigh into The Masticatory Performance of Complete

Denture Wearer. Annals of Dentistry University of Malaya. 2006; 13 :

24-33.

22. Dogan BG, Gokalp S. Tooth Loss and Edentulism in The Turkish

Elderly. Archives Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2012; 54 : 162-66.

23. Sundjaja Y. Attitudes of Saudi male patients toward the replacement of

teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90 :572-7

http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i11/medoralv14i11p573,pdf

http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i11/medoralv14i11p573,pdf

43

24. Muller F, Schimmel M Tooth Loss and Dental Prostheses in The Oldes

Old. Europan Griatric Medicine. 2010; 1 :39-43.

25. Mc Cord,J.F., Grand,A., Youngson,C., Watson,R.M., Davis,D.M.,

2003, Missing Teeth A Guide to Treatment Options, Edinburgh:

Churchill Livingstone, h.11-15.

26. Osterberg, T., Era,P., Gause-Nilsson, I., Steen, B., 1995, Dental State

and Functional Capacity in 75 Yeart Olds in Three Nordic Localities, J

Oral Rehabil., 22:653-660.

27. Okada,K., Enoki,H., Izawa,S., Iguchi,A., Kuzuya,M., 2010,

Association Between Masticatory Performance And Anthropometric

Measurement and Nutional Status in the Elderly, Geriatri. Gerontol. In

January 10(1) :56-63

28. Hugo, F.N., Hilgert, J.B.,de Sousa, M.L.R.,da Silva,D.D.,Pucca Jr

G.A.,2007, Correlates of Partial Tooth Loss and Edentulism in the

Brazilian Elderly, Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.,35 :224-232.

29. Davis,DM.,Fiske,J.,Scott,B., Radford, D.R., 2000, The Emotional

Effect of Tooth Loss : A Preliminary Quantitative Study,

Br.Dent.J.,188: 503-506.

30. Preshaw,P.M., Walls, A.W.G.,Jacobovics, N.S.,Moynihan,P.J.,Jepson,

N.J.A, Loewy,Z., 2011, Association of Removable Partial Denture Use

with Oral and Systemic Health, J.Dent, 39: 711-719

31. Abnet,C.C. ,Qiao, Y.I., Dawscy,S.M. 2005, Tooth loss is Associated

with Increased Risk of Total Death and Death from Upper

Gastrointestinal Cancer, Heart Disease, and Stroke in A Chinese

Population-Based Cohort.Int.J.of Epidemiol., 34: 467-74

32. Park, K.,2007, Concept of Health and Disease, dalam Park, K., (ed),

Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Sosial Medicine, 19th

ed.,

Banarsidas Bhanot Publisher, jabalpur, 12-47.

33. Mehrstedt, M., Tonnies, S., and Micheelis, W., 2007, Oral Health

Related Quality of Life in Patients with Dental Anxiety, Community

Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(5):357-363.

44

34. Haryanto AG, Anton Margo, Lusiana KB, Freddy Suryatenggara,

Indra Setiabudi,1991, Ilmu Geligi Tiruan Sebagian Lepasan.jakarta:

Hipokatres

35. Roy,T.,2002, Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the

Link, J.Eco.History, 62(2): 611-612.

36. Rusanen, Jana,et al. Quality of Lifein patient with severe malocclusion

before treatment. Finlandia : Europian Journal of Orthodontics.2009.

37. Harris, N.O, 2004. Introduction to Primery Preventive Dentristry,

dalam: Harris, N.O dan Garcia-Godoy, F: Primary Preventive

Dentristry, 6th

ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

38. GD, slade and Aj. Spencer. NCBI. Pub med.hov [ online][cited

:Januari 18,2014]. http//www.ncbi.nml.nih./gov/pubmed/8193981

39. Wangasaraharja K, Dharmawan OV, Kasim E. Hubungan antara

kesehatan mulut dengan kualitas hidup terkait kualitas pada usia lanjut.

Universa Medicina. 2007:26(4) :18809

45

Lampiran 1. Etichal Clearence

46

Lampiran 2. Surat ijin penelitian

47

48

Lampiran 3. Informed consent

INFORMED CONSENT

PENELITIAN PERBEDAAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN GERIATRI DI

RSUP. DR. KARIADI SEMARANG YANG MENDAPAT PERAWATAN

GIGI DAN TIDAK MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI

Setelah mendengar penjelasan dan diberi kesempatan untuk mengajukan

pertanyaan-pertanyaan mengenai tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan

resiko penelitian ini, saya atas nama pribadi memahami tujuan, manfaat, prosedur,

lamanya waktu, dan resiko penelitian ini serta bersedia tanda tangan dibawah ini

secara sukarela untuk berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini:

Nama : ..........................................................................................................

Jenis kelamin : ..........................................................................................................

Umur : ..........................................................................................................

Alamat : ..........................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................

No Telp/Hp : ..........................................................................................................

Dengan ketentuan apabila ada hal-hal yang tidak berkenan pada saya, maka saya

berhak mengajukan pengunduran diri dari penelitian ini.

Semarang,...../...../2014

Peneliti Responden

(Wahyu Wijayanti) (.........................................)

Saksi

(.....................................)

49

Lampiran 4. Kuisioner OHIP-14

Kuisioner Oral Health Impact Profile -14

Pertanyaan-pertanyaan pada kuisioner ini menanyakan tentang keluhan-keluhan

yang Anda rasakan akibat permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda dalam satu

bulan terakhir.

Contoh:

Seberapa sering Anda merasakan

keluhan ini dalam satu bulan

terakhir

Tidak

pernah

Sangat

jarang

Kadang-

kadang

Sering Sangat

sering

Apakah Anda memiliki kesulitan

dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat

(berbicara) karena permasalahan

pada rongga mulut?

0 1 2 3 4

Jika selama satu bulan terakhir Anda sering merasa kesulitan dalam mengucapkan

kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda, maka

Anda melingkari pilihan no 3.


keluhan ini dalam satu bulan

terakhir

Tidak

pernah

Sangat

jarang

Kadang-

kadang

Sering Sangat

sering

Apakah Anda memiliki kesulitan


(berbicara) karena permasalahan

pada rongga mulut?

0 1 2 4

Sekarang buka halaman selanjutnya dan dimohon untuk menjawab semua

pertanyaan yang ada.

Jika Anda kurang mengerti mengenai maksud dari pertanyaan tersebut, dimohon

untuk menanyakan kepada petugas yang mendampingi Anda.

Setelah semua pertanyaan terjawab, dimohon untuk mengumpulkan kuisioner ini

kepada petugas yang mendampingi Anda.

3

50

Kuisioner Oral Health Impact Profile -14


keluhan ini dalam satu bulan terakhir

Tidak

pernah

Sangat

jarang

Kadang-

kadang

Sering Sangat

sering

Apakah Anda pernah merasa kesulitan


(berbicara) karena permasalahan rongga

mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak dapat

mengecap rasa dengan baik karena

permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasakan sakit

pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak

nyaman saat mengunyah makanan

karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut

Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa kawatir

/cemas karena permasalahan pada

rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa ‘tegang‘


Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak puas

dengan makanan yang anda konsumsi


Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Pernahkah Anda harus berhenti secara

tiba-tiba saat sedang mengunyah

makanan karena permasalahan pada

rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah mengalami

kesulitan untuk merasa rileks/santai

karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa malu


Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah menjadi mudah

tersinggung karena permasalahan pada

rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah melakukan

kesulitan untuk melakukan kegiatan

sehari-hari karena permasalahan pada

0 1 2 3 4

51

rongga mulut Anda?

Apakah Anda pernah merasa hidup anda

kurang memuaskan karena


0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa susah

untuk melakukan apapun karena


0 1 2 3 4

52

Lampiran 5. Formulir data sampel

PENELITIAN PERBEDAAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN GERIATRI DI

RSUP. DR. KARIADI SEMARANG YANG MENDAPAT PERAWATAN

GIGI DAN TIDAK MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI

I. IDENTITAS

Nama : ..............................................................................................

Jenis kelamin : ..............................................................................................

Umur : ..............................................................................................

Alamat : ..............................................................................................

...............................................................................................

No Telp/Hp : ..............................................................................................

II. DIAGNOSA

Diagnosa perawatan gigi : Ya / Tidak

III. TOTAL SKOR OHIP-14 : ........................point

53

Lampiran6. Hasil uji analisis statistik

Frequencies

Jenis kelamin

18 45.0 45.0 45.0

22 55.0 55.0 100.0

40 100.0 100.0

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Total

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e

Percent

OHIP.2

18 45.0 45.0 45.0 6 15.0 15.0 60.0

11 27.5 27.5 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0

40 100.0 100.0

tidak pernah

sangat jarang kadang-kadang

sering Total

Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

OHIP.1

21 52.5 52.5 52.5

11 27.5 27.5 80.0 4 10.0 10.0 90.0 3 7.5 7.5 97.5

1 2.5 2.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-kadang sering sangat sering

Total


Cumulative Percent

54

OHIP.5

20 50.0 50.0 50.0 1 2.5 2.5 52.5 7 17.5 17.5 70.0

8 20.0 20.0 90.0 4 10.0 10.0 100.0

40 100.0 100.0

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang

sering sangat sering

Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.4

13 32.5 32.5 32.5 1 2.5 2.5 35.0

3 7.5 7.5 42.5 6 15.0 15.0 57.5

17 42.5 42.5 100.0

40 100.0 100.0



Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.3

14 35.0 35.0 35.0

6 15.0 15.0 50.0 10 25.0 25.0 75.0 7 17.5 17.5 92.5

3 7.5 7.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0



Total


Cumulative Percent

55

OHIP.8

18 45.0 45.0 45.0 4 10.0 10.0 55.0

12 30.0 30.0 85.0 5 12.5 12.5 97.5 1 2.5 2.5 100.0

40 100.0 100.0


sering sangat sering Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.7

13 32.5 32.5 32.5 7 17.5 17.5 50.0

3 7.5 7.5 57.5 3 7.5 7.5 65.0

14 35.0 35.0 100.0

40 100.0 100.0



Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.6

19 47.5 47.5 47.5

3 7.5 7.5 55.0 4 10.0 10.0 65.0 9 22.5 22.5 87.5

5 12.5 12.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0



Total


Cumulative Percent

56

OHIP.11

21 52.5 52.5 52.5 3 7.5 7.5 60.0 8 20.0 20.0 80.0

3 7.5 7.5 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0

40 100.0 100.0


sering sangat sering

Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.10

21 52.5 52.5 52.5 10 25.0 25.0 77.5

4 10.0 10.0 87.5 3 7.5 7.5 95.0 2 5.0 5.0 100.0

40 100.0 100.0



Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.9

21 52.5 52.5 52.5

5 12.5 12.5 65.0 8 20.0 20.0 85.0 4 10.0 10.0 95.0

2 5.0 5.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0



Total


Cumulative Percent

57

Perawatan

20 50.0 50.0 50.0

20 50.0 50.0 100.0

40 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e

Percent

OHIP.14

20 50.0 50.0 50.0

7 17.5 17.5 67.5 8 20.0 20.0 87.5 3 7.5 7.5 95.0

2 5.0 5.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0


sering sangat sering Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.13

19 47.5 47.5 47.5 5 12.5 12.5 60.0 5 12.5 12.5 72.5

6 15.0 15.0 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0

40 100.0 100.0

tidak pernah

sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering

sangat sering Total


Cumulative Percent

OHIP.12

20 50.0 50.0 50.0 6 15.0 15.0 65.0

8 20.0 20.0 85.0 6 15.0 15.0 100.0

40 100.0 100.0

tidak pernah

sangat jarang kadang-kadang

sering Total


Cumulative Percent

58

59

Descriptives

Crosstabs

Descriptive Statistics

40 61 87 72.58 7.136

40 .8571 4.0000 2.710714 1.1850002

40

Umur

Rerata skor kualitas hidup

Valid N (listwise)

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Dev iation

Umur * Perawatan Crosstabulation

13 14 27

65.0% 70.0% 67.5%

32.5% 35.0% 67.5%

7 6 13

35.0% 30.0% 32.5%

17.5% 15.0% 32.5%

20 20 40

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Count

% within Perawatan

% of Total

Count

% within Perawatan

% of Total

Count

% within Perawatan

% of Total

Usila

Usila tua

Umur

Total

Ya Tidak

Perawatan

Total

60

Chi-Square Tests

.114b 1 .736

.000 1 1.000

.114 1 .736

1.000 .500

.111 1 .739

40

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.

50.

b.

Jenis kelamin * Perawatan Crosstabulation

7 11 18

35.0% 55.0% 45.0%

17.5% 27.5% 45.0%

13 9 22

65.0% 45.0% 55.0%

32.5% 22.5% 55.0%

20 20 40

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Count

% within Perawatan

% of Total

Count

% within Perawatan

% of Total

Count

% within Perawatan

% of Total

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Jenis kelamin

Total

Ya Tidak

Perawatan

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.616b 1 .204

.909 1 .340

1.628 1 .202

.341 .170

1.576 1 .209

40

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.

00.

b.

61

Explore

Jenis kelamin

Descriptives

20,28 3,594

12,69

27,86

20,25

25,50

232,565

15,250

0

41

41

31

-,202 ,536

-1,694 1,038

16,23 3,785

8,36

24,10

15,59

3,50

315,136

17,752

0

44

44

33

,519 ,491

-1,622 ,953

Mean

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

95% Conf idence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

Median

Variance

Std. Dev iat ion

Minimum

Maximum

Range

Interquart ile Range

Skewness

Kurtosis

Mean

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

95% Conf idence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

Median

Variance

Std. Dev iat ion

Minimum

Maximum

Range


Skewness

Kurtosis

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Kualitas hidup

Stat istic Std. Error

Tests of Normality

,179 18 ,134 ,876 18 ,022

,289 22 ,000 ,778 22 ,000

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Kualitas hidup

Stat ist ic df Sig. Stat ist ic df Sig.

Kolmogorov -Smirnova

Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Signif icance Correctiona.

62

63

Kualitas hidup

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

18 21,72 391,00

22 19,50 429,00

40

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Total

Kualitas hidup

N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

64

Explore

Umur

Test Statisticsb

176,000

429,000

-,600

,548

,563a

Mann-Whitney U

Wilcoxon W

Z

Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed

Sig.)]

Kualitas

hidup

Not corrected f or ties.a.

Grouping Variable: Jenis kelaminb.

65

Descriptives

17,22 3,037

10,98

23,47

16,89

15,00

249,103

15,783

0

41

41

32

,202 ,448

-1,760 ,872

19,77 5,189

8,46

31,07

19,52

20,00

350,026

18,709

0

44

44

38

,152 ,616

-1,994 1,191

Mean

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

95% Conf idence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

Median

Variance

Std. Dev iat ion

Minimum

Maximum

Range


Skewness

Kurtosis

Mean

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

95% Conf idence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

Median

Variance

Std. Dev iat ion

Minimum

Maximum

Range


Skewness

Kurtosis

Umur

Usila

Usila tua

Kualitas hidup

Stat istic Std. Error

Tests of Normality

,202 27 ,006 ,839 27 ,001

,290 13 ,004 ,804 13 ,008

Umur

Usila

Usila tua

Kualitas hidup


Kolmogorov -Smirnova

Shapiro-Wilk


66

Kualitas hidup

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

27 19,74 533,00

13 22,08 287,00

40

Umur

Usila

Usila tua

Total

Kualitas hidup


67

Crosstabs

Test Statisticsb

155,000

533,000

-,594

,552

,568a

Mann-Whitney U

Wilcoxon W

Z



Sig.)]

Kualitas

hidup


Grouping Variable: Umurb.

Perawatan * OHIP.2 Crosstabulation

17 3 0 0 20 94.4% 50.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 42.5% 7.5% .0% .0% 50.0%

1 3 11 5 20 5.6% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 7.5% 27.5% 12.5% 50.0%

18 6 11 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 45.0% 15.0% 27.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Count % within P2 % of Total Count % within P2 % of Total Count % within P2 % of Total

Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-k

adang sering

P2

Total


16 4 0 0 0 20 76.2% 36.4% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 40.0% 10.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

5 7 4 3 1 20 23.8% 63.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 12.5% 17.5% 10.0% 7.5% 2.5% 50.0%

21 11 4 3 1 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

52.5% 27.5% 10.0% 7.5% 2.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang Kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering

P1

Total

68


19 0 0 1 0 20 95.0% .0% .0% 12.5% .0% 50.0% 47.5% .0% .0% 2.5% .0% 50.0%

1 1 7 7 4 20 5.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 2.5% 17.5% 17.5% 10.0% 50.0%

20 1 7 8 4 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

50.0% 2.5% 17.5% 20.0% 10.0% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P5

Total


13 1 3 2 1 20 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 5.9% 50.0%

32.5% 2.5% 7.5% 5.0% 2.5% 50.0% 0 0 0 4 16 20

.0% .0% .0% 66.7% 94.1% 50.0%

.0% .0% .0% 10.0% 40.0% 50.0% 13 1 3 6 17 40

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.5% 2.5% 7.5% 15.0% 42.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P4

Total


13 3 4 0 0 20 92.9% 50.0% 40.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 32.5% 7.5% 10.0% .0% .0% 50.0%

1 3 6 7 3 20 7.1% 50.0% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 7.5% 15.0% 17.5% 7.5% 50.0%

14 6 10 7 3 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

35.0% 15.0% 25.0% 17.5% 7.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P3

Total

69


18 2 0 0 0 20 100.0% 50.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

45.0% 5.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 0 2 12 5 1 20

.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0%

.0% 5.0% 30.0% 12.5% 2.5% 50.0% 18 4 12 5 1 40

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 45.0% 10.0% 30.0% 12.5% 2.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P8

Total


13 5 2 0 0 20 100.0% 71.4% 66.7% .0% .0% 50.0%

32.5% 12.5% 5.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 0 2 1 3 14 20

.0% 28.6% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0%

.0% 5.0% 2.5% 7.5% 35.0% 50.0% 13 7 3 3 14 40

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.5% 17.5% 7.5% 7.5% 35.0% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P7

Total


19 1 0 0 0 20 100.0% 33.3% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 0 2 4 9 5 20

.0% 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0%

.0% 5.0% 10.0% 22.5% 12.5% 50.0% 19 3 4 9 5 40

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 47.5% 7.5% 10.0% 22.5% 12.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P6

Total

70


19 0 1 0 0 20 90.5% .0% 12.5% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% .0% 2.5% .0% .0% 50.0%

2 3 7 3 5 20 9.5% 100.0% 87.5% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 5.0% 7.5% 17.5% 7.5% 12.5% 50.0%

21 3 8 3 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.5% 7.5% 20.0% 7.5% 12.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P11

Total


18 2 0 0 0 20 85.7% 20.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 45.0% 5.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

3 8 4 3 2 20 14.3% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 7.5% 20.0% 10.0% 7.5% 5.0% 50.0%

21 10 4 3 2 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.5% 25.0% 10.0% 7.5% 5.0% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P10

Total


19 1 0 0 0 20 90.5% 20.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

2 4 8 4 2 20 9.5% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 5.0% 50.0%

21 5 8 4 2 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

52.5% 12.5% 20.0% 10.0% 5.0% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P9

Total

71


19 1 0 0 0 20 95.0% 14.3% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

1 6 8 3 2 20 5.0% 85.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 15.0% 20.0% 7.5% 5.0% 50.0%

20 7 8 3 2 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 17.5% 20.0% 7.5% 5.0% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P14

Total


18 2 0 0 0 20 94.7% 40.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 45.0% 5.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0%

1 3 5 6 5 20 5.3% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 7.5% 12.5% 15.0% 12.5% 50.0%

19 5 5 6 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 47.5% 12.5% 12.5% 15.0% 12.5% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total



P13

Total


19 1 0 0 20 95.0% 16.7% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% 50.0%

1 5 8 6 20 5.0% 83.3% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 12.5% 20.0% 15.0% 50.0%

20 6 8 6 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 15.0% 20.0% 15.0% 100.0%


Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-k adang sering

P12

Total

72

Explore

Perawatan

Descriptives

.210714 .0739181

.056002

.365427

.154762

.142857

.109

.3305717

.0000

1.4286

1.4286

.2500

2.938 .512

9.995 .992

2.367857 .1272778

2.101462

2.634253

2.396825

2.392857

.324

.5692038

1.0714

3.1429

2.0714

.7500

-.728 .512

.199 .992

Mean

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

95% Conf idence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

Median

Variance

Std. Dev iation

Minimum

Maximum

Range


Skewness

Kurtosis

Mean

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

95% Conf idence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

Median

Variance

Std. Dev iation

Minimum

Maximum

Range


Skewness

Kurtosis

Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Rerata skor

kualitas hidup

Stat ist ic Std. Error

Tests of Normality

.331 20 .000 .631 20 .000

.096 20 .200* .946 20 .316

Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Rerata skor

kualitas hidup

Stat istic df Sig. Stat istic df Sig.

Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Shapiro-Wilk

This is a lower bound of the true signif icance.*.


73

74

Rerata skor kualitas hidup

Means

Perawatan

TidakYa

Rera

ta s

ko

r ku

alita

s h

idu

p

4.0000

3.0000

2.0000

1.0000

0.0000

16

10

Report

.35 20 .489 3.40 20 1.603 1.88 40 1.937

1.40 20 1.818 6.20 20 1.196 3.80 40 2.866

.20 20 .894 5.45 20 1.820 2.83 40 3.012

.55 20 .887 5.70 20 1.380 3.13 40 2.848

.15 20 .489 3.65 20 2.033 1.90 40 2.296

.15 20 .671 4.25 20 1.618 2.20 40 2.409

.15 20 .489 4.50 20 1.960 2.33 40 2.615

Keterbatasan fungsi

Rasa sakit f isik

Ketidaknyaman psikis

Ketidakmampuan f isik

Ketidakmampuan psikis

Ketdiakmampuan sosial

Handikap

Mean N

Std.

Dev iation Mean N

Std.

Dev iation Mean N

Std.

Dev iation

Ya Tidak Total

Perawatan

75

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Tests of Normality

.413 20 .000 .608 20 .000

.146 20 .200* .960 20 .535

.279 20 .000 .766 20 .000

.184 20 .076 .922 20 .108

.538 20 .000 .236 20 .000

.219 20 .013 .905 20 .050

.382 20 .000 .679 20 .000

.386 20 .000 .751 20 .000

.520 20 .000 .354 20 .000

.125 20 .200* .966 20 .666

.538 20 .000 .236 20 .000

.178 20 .095 .951 20 .383

.520 20 .000 .354 20 .000

.128 20 .200* .937 20 .212

Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Keterbatasan fungsi

Rasa sakit f isik





Handikap


Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Shapiro-Wilk

This is a lower bound of the true signif icance.*.


76

Ranks

20 11.35 227.00

20 29.65 593.00

40

20 10.95 219.00

20 30.05 601.00

40

20 10.75 215.00

20 30.25 605.00

40

20 10.63 212.50

20 30.38 607.50

40

20 11.73 234.50

20 29.28 585.50

40

20 10.75 215.00

20 30.25 605.00

40

20 11.10 222.00

20 29.90 598.00

40

Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total

Ya

Tidak

Total

Ya

Tidak

Total

Ya

Tidak

Total

Ya

Tidak

Total

Ya

Tidak

Total

Ya

Tidak

Total

Keterbatasan fungsi

Rasa sakit f isik





Handikap


Test Statisticsb

17.000 9.000 5.000 2.500 24.500 5.000 12.000

227.000 219.000 215.000 212.500 234.500 215.000 222.000

-5.092 -5.236 -5.612 -5.505 -5.084 -5.598 -5.391

.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

.000a

.000a

.000a

.000a

.000a

.000a

.000a

Mann-Whitney U

Wilcoxon W

Z



Sig.)]

Keterbatasan

f ungsi

Rasa

sakit f isik

Ketidaknya

man psikis

Ketidakma

mpuan f isik

Ketidakmam

puan psikis

Ketdiakmam

puan sosial Handikap


Grouping Variable: Perawatanb.

77

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

20 10.60 212.00

20 30.40 608.00

40

Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total

Rerata skor

kualitas hidup


Test Statisticsb

2.000

212.000

-5.376

.000

.000a

Mann-Whitney U

Wilcoxon W

Z



Sig.)]

Rerata skor

kualitas hidup


Grouping Variable: Perawatanb.

78

Lampiran 7. foto dokumentasi penelitian

Documents

DAFTAR PUSTAKA - core.ac.uk · Setelah mendengar penjelasan dan diberi kesempatan untuk mengajukan pertanyaan-pertanyaan mengenai tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan resiko