D EMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION AND CHANGE 2000 TO 2010 …...San Antonio Demographic Distribution & Change: 2000 to 2010 3 P OPULATION COMPARISONS Population Comparison with Major Cities

1S a n A n t o n i o D e m o g r a p h i c D i s t r i b u t i o n & C h a n g e : 2 0 0 0 t o 2 0 1 0

D E M O G R A P H I C D I S T R I B U T I O N A N D C H A N G E

2 0 0 0 T O 2 0 1 0

S U M M A R Y R E P O R T

C O U N C I L D I S T R I C T

D e p a r t m e n t o f P l a n n i n g & C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t

M a r c h 2 0 1 2

Fred Gonzales, Communication and Public Affairs

Mayor and City Council Offi cialsJulián Castro, Mayor

Diego M. Bernal, District 1Ivy R. Taylor, District 2Leticia Ozuna, District 3

Rey A. Saldaña, District 4David Medina, Jr., District 5

Ray Lopez, District 6Cris Medina, District 7

W. Reed Williams, District 8Elisa Chan, District 9

Carlton Soules, District 10

Department of Planning and Community Development Project Team

David Ellison, Acting Assistant City ManagerJohn Dugan, Planning and Community Development Director

Christopher Looney, Assistant DirectorJoe G. Mendoza, Planning Coordinator

Kristine Egan, Senior GIS AnalystDoug Overton, Senior GIS Analyst


Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1

Population Comparisons .......................................................................................3

Bexar County Demographic Changes ..................................................................8

City of San Antonio ..............................................................................................11 Council District 1 ............................................................................................................16 Council District 2 ...........................................................................................................18

Council District 3 ...........................................................................................................20Council District 4 ...........................................................................................................22Council District 5 ...........................................................................................................24Council District 6 ...........................................................................................................26Council District 7 ...........................................................................................................28Council District 8 ...........................................................................................................30Council District 9 ...........................................................................................................32Council District 10 .........................................................................................................34

Methodology .........................................................................................................36

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

2 C i t y o f S a n A n t o n i o

Page intentionally left blank


I N T R O D U C T I O N

The purpose of this report is to present an overview of Bexar County and San Antonio area demographic changes between 2000 and 2010 using U.S. Census Bureau decennial census Summary File 1 (SF 1) data. Selected race/ethnicity; age; household; and housing unit data are presented in tables and charts and text highlights. The data are provided for a total of twelve geographic areas of analysis including: Bexar County; the City of San Antonio; and the ten City of San Antonio Council Districts.

S U M M A R Y

National: San Antonio’s population grew by approximately 15.9% from 1,144,646 to 1,326,539 (see methodology section). The 15.9% increase moved San Antonio from the 9th largest city in the U.S. in 2000 to the 7th largest by 2010. San Antonio was the fastest growing city among the top ten largest cities in the nation, adding more people to its total population and having the greatest percent change between 2000 and 2010.

Texas: San Antonio is now the second largest city in Texas, behind Houston (population 2,099,451) and ahead of Dallas (population 1,197,816), Austin (population 790,390), and Ft. Worth (population 741,206). Of the ten largest cities in Texas, San Antonio’s population growth rate ranked fi fth behind Ft. Worth (+38.6%), Laredo (+33.7%), Austin (+20.4%), and Plano (+17%).

County: Bexar County grew from a population of 1,392,931 to 1,714,773 (+23.1%). The county grew at a signifi cantly higher rate than the City of San Antonio over the last ten years. Bexar County’s Hispanic or Latino, Not Hispanic or Latino Black or African American Alone (hereafter referred to as Black or African American) and Not Hispanic or Latin Asian Alone (hereafter referred to as Asian) populations grew at signifi cantly higher rates than (+33%, +23.4% and +85.1%, respectively) than the City of San Antonio’s over the last ten years. In contrast to the City of San Antonio’s declining Not Hispanic or Latino White Alone (hereafter referred to as White) population, Bexar County’s White population grew (+4.6%).

City: As mendtioned above, San Antonio grew from a population of 1,144,646 to 1,326,539 (+15.9%), adding 181,893 people to the total population. The Hispanic or Latino (of any race) population accounted for 91.9% of this increase. Race/Ethnicity: The Hispanic or Latino population grew from 671,394 to 838,454 (+24.9%). The White population decreased from 364,357 to 352,858 (-3.2%). This was the only population group that decreased. The Black or African American population grew from 74,778 people to 83,302 people (+11.4%). The Asian population was the fastest growing group, increasing from 17,084 to 30,562 (+78.9%). Hispanics or Latinos continue to represent the largest proportion of the total population at 63.2%, followed by Whites (26.6%), Blacks or African Americans (6.3%), Asians (2.3%) and all others (1.6%). Gender: While the growth rate of the male population in San Antonio was slightly higher than females (+17% and +14.9% respectively) females remain a slight majority of the total population.

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y


Age: The median age of San Antonio has increased over the last ten years from 32.9 to 34.3. Council District 4 continues to have the lowest median age of all Districts, at 30.8 and Council District 9 continues to have the highest median age at 37.8. Households Size and Type: Households are getting smaller in San Antonio. Between 2000 and 2010, the average household size of housholds up to seven persons or more decreased from 2.74 to 2.69. Non-family households grew at a much faster rate than traditional family households, (+29.4% and +13.2%) respectively. Housing: Bexar County added housing units at a faster rate than the city over the last ten years, (+27.1% and +20.9%). The city growth rate for renter occupied (+22.6) and vacant (+61.2%) housing units both outpaced the growth rate of owner occupied (+15%) housing units.

C H A N G E S I N T H E D E C E N N I A L C E N S U S A N D D A T A G A T H E R E D

Prior to the 2010 Decennial Census, one out of every six households received a much longer census form than all other households with socio-economic demographic questions to complete. In addition to topics included on the short form, the long form questions covered topics such as: Income, Employment; Education; Travel Times to Work; Housing Costs and Poverty. Due to the unpopularity of the long-form census it was discontinued in the 2010 Decennial Census and thus substantially less information is now being produced from that data source. The topics that continue to be addressed in the Decennial Census include: Population; Sex; Age; Race; Ethnicity; Household / Family; Housing Units; and Group Quarters.

The Decennial Census long form was replaced by the American Community Survey (ACS). The ACS is an on-going survey with approximately 1 out of 55 households returning a survey each month. Due to the much smaller sample size, data is released depending on the size of population in the survey area. For some areas, such as states and larger counties (with populations greater than 65,000), data is available annually. For other areas (at least 20,000 in population size), three years of data are required for a data release. For areas smaller than 20,000 in population size, such as small counties and census tracts, fi ve years of survey returns are required to generate a statistically valid survey response.

An alternative data source to the ACS can be obtained from a private data provider such as Nielsen Claritas. The benefi t of these data is that they are produced annually at small resolutions such as census block groups, which are smaller geographies than tracts and much better suited to aggregating by areas such as Council Districts. In addition, this data provider uses multiple private and public (including the Decennial Census and ACS) data sources, with most obtained on at least an annual basis, to create and update its demographic database.

A D D E N D U M

The Addendum provides greater detail regarding: SF 1 datasets; data resolution; source tables for the data included in this report; clarifi cations of Race / Ethnicity and Types of Households / Same Sex Couple issues; the City of San Antonio versus Census Bureau’s population calculations; the procedure used to assign block to particular Council Districts, and further details regarding the update to the Population Distribution and Change report released in May 2010.


P O P U L A T I O N C O M P A R I S O N S

P o p u l a t i o n C o m p a r i s o n w i t h M a j o r C i t i e s i n t h e U . S .

In 2000, San Antonio was the ninth most populated city in the United States. By 2010 San Antonio moved to the seventh most populated city with 1,326,539 people. Nine of the top ten most populated cit-ies in 2000 remained within the top ten in 2010. Detroit was ranked 10th in 2000 but fell to 18th in 2010. San Jose replaced Detroit as the 10th largest city for 2010, moving up from the 11th largest in 2000.

From 2000 to 2010, San Antonio had the highest percent of population increase (+15.9%) of the ten largest cities with a gain of 181,893 people. In addition to San Antonio, New York City (+166,855), Houston (+145,820), and Phoenix (+124,587) gained the most population between 2000 and 2010. However, the percent change of those cities was less than San Antonio (+2.1%, +7.5%, and +9.4% respectively). Of the ten cities, Chicago was the only city to lose population (-6.9%), losing more people (-200,418) than was gained by any other individual top ten city.

Ten Largest Cites in the United States Population Change, 2000-2010

U.S. Cities Total Population 2000

Total Population 2010

Number Change2000-2010

Percent Change

1 New York City 8,008,278 8,175,133 166,855 2.1%2 Los Angeles 3,694,820 3,792,621 97,801 2.6%3 Chicago 2,896,016 2,695,598 (200,418) -6.9%4 Houston 1,953,631 2,099,451 145,820 7.5%5 Philadelphia 1,517,550 1,526,006 8,456 0.6%6 Phoenix 1,321,045 1,445,632 124,587 9.4%7 San Antonio 1,144,646 1,326,539 181,893 15.9%8 San Diego 1,223,400 1,307,402 84,002 6.9%9 Dallas 1,188,580 1,197,816 9,236 0.8%10 San Jose 894,943 945,942 50,999 5.7%

2010 Top Ten Largest Population Cities in the United States

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

7,000,000

8,000,000

9,000,000

New York City

Los Angele

s

Chicago

Houston

Philadelp

hia

Phoenix

San Antonio

San Dieg

oDalla

s

San Jose

2000 2010

Note: Detroit was in the 10th position in 2000. San Jose became a Top Ten City in 2010.


P o p u l a t i o n C o m p a r i s o n w i t h M a j o r C i t i e s i n T e x a s

In 2000, San Antonio was the third most populated city (1,144,646) in Texas after Houston (1,953,631) and Dallas (1,188,580). By 2010, the population of San Antonio (1,326,539) had surpassed that of Dallas (1,197,816) making San Antonio the second most populated city in the state after Houston (2,099,451).

The only other top ten city to add more population than San Antonio was Fort Worth. Fort Worth added 206,512 people, growing from 534,694 to 741,206. Fort Worth had a higher growth rate (+38.6%) than any other top ten city. The other top ten cities with a greater percent change in population from 2000 to 2010 than San Antonio (+15.9%) were Laredo (+33.7%), Austin (+20.4%), and Plano (+17%). Despite remaining the top ranked city, Houston had the second lowest growth rate (+7.5%) after Dallas (+0.8%).

Ten Largest Cities in Texas Population Change, 2000-2010Name Total Population

2000Total Population

2010Numeric Change

Percent Change

1 Houston 1,953,631 2,099,451 145,820 7.5%2 San Antonio 1,144,646 1,326,539 181,893 15.9%3 Dallas 1,188,580 1,197,816 9,236 0.8%4 Austin 656,562 790,390 133,828 20.4%5 Fort Worth 534,694 741,206 206,512 38.6%6 El Paso 563,662 649,121 85,459 15.2%7 Arlington 332,969 365,438 32,469 9.8%8 Corpus Christi 277,454 305,215 27,761 10%9 Plano 222,030 259,841 37,811 17%10 Laredo 176,576 236,091 59,515 33.7%

2010 Top Ten Largest Population Cities in Texas

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

Housto

n

San A

ntonio

Dallas

Austin

Fort

Worth

El Pas

o

Arlingto

n

Corpus

Chris

ti

Plano

Lared

o

2000 2010

Note: Garland was in the 10th position in 2000. Larado became a Top Ten City in 2010.


P o p u l a t i o n C o m p a r i s o n s w i t h B e x a r C o u n t y C i t i e s & U n i n c o r p o r a t e d A r e a s

Bexar County grew from a population of 1,392,931 to 1,714,773 (+23.1%). The unincorporated areas of Bexar County had a higher population growth rate (+76.9%) than the incorporated cities of Bexar County exclusive of San Antonio (+26.8%), as well as the City of San Antonio (+15.9%).

P o p u l a t i o n C o m p a r i s o n s w i t h B e x a r C o u n t y b y G e o g r a p h i c A r e a s

The geographic areas included in this section were established by major roadway divisions to provide a broader context within which to compare population shifts in Bexar County between 2000 and 2010. Geographic areas A – H represent all of Bexar County including incorporated and unincorporated areas.

San Antonio and Bexar County Population Change, 2000-20102000

Population2010

PopulationNumeric Change

Percent Change

City of San Antonio 1,144,646 1,326,539* 181,893 15.9%

Other Incorporated Cities in Bexar County (excluding San Antonio)

101,813 129,116 27,303 26.8%

Bexar County Unincorporated Areas 146,472 259,144 112,672 76.9%Bexar County Total 1,392,931 1,714,773 321,842 23.1%

*2010 City of San Antonio population includes 26 people in Medina County

2000-2010 Bexar County Population Change by SectionName 2000 Pop. Percent of

2000 Pop Total

2010 Pop. Percent of 2010 Pop

Total

Numeric Change

Percent Change

A. Far West 16,013 1.1% 71,464 4.2% 55,451 346.3%B. Far Northwest 40,297 2.9% 111,571 6.5% 71,274 176.9%C. Far Northeast 30,171 2.2% 59,959 3.5% 29,788 98.7%D. Far South 31,461 2.3% 40,099 2.3% 8,638 27.5%E. Near North 566,744 40.7% 704,034 41.1% 137,290 24.2%F. Near South 40,369 2.9% 54,998 3.2% 14,629 36.2%G. Inside Loop 410 658,452 47.3% 662,500 38.6% 4,048 0.6%H. Central Business District (CBD)

9,424 0.7% 10,148 0.6% 724 7.7%

Population Total 1,392,931 100% 1,714,773 100% 321,842 23.1%


F a r W e s t , F a r N o r t h w e s t , F a r

N o r t h e a s t : G e o g r a p h i c A r e a s A – CThe geographic areas that had the highest growth rates were located in northern Bexar County and situated north of Loop 1604. These three areas contained 14.2% of the total Bexar County population in 2010, a change from 6.2% in 2000. An additional 156,513 people were added to these three areas between 2000 and 2010, accounting for 48.6% of the County’s total population growth.

The Hispanic or Latino population increased by 364.0%, growing from 18,772 to 87,098. The Hispanic or Latino population now represents 35.8% of the area’s total population, an increase from 21.7% in 2000. The White population increased by 107.3%, growing from

60,883 to 126,217. The White population now represents 51.9% of the area’s total population, a decrease from 70.4% in 2000. The Black or African American population increased by 298.8%, growing from 3,105 to 12,382. The Black or African American population now represents 5.1% of the area’s total population, an increase from 3.6% in 2000. The Asian population increased by 466.2%, growing from 1,985 to 11,239. The Asian population now represents 4.6% of the area’s total population, an increase from 2.3% in 2000.

The Far West area had a higher population growth rate (+346.3%) than any of the other geographic areas, growing from 16,013 to 71,464. This area’s population now represents 4.2% of the total Bexar County population, a change from 1.1% in 2000. The Far Northwest area had the second largest population growth rate (+176.9%), growing from 40,297 to 111,5710. This area’s population represents 6.5% of the total Bexar County population, a change from 2.9% in 2000. The Far Northeast area had the third largest population growth rate (+98.7%), growing from 30,171 to 59,959. This area’s population represents 3.5% of the total Bexar County population, a change from 2.2% in 2000.

N e a r N o r t h : G e o g r a p h i c A r e a EThe geographic area located in northern Bexar County and situated between Loop 410 and Loop 1604 added more people (+137,290) than any other geographic area between 2000 and 2010. The Near North area had a growth rate of 24.2%, growing from 566,744 to 704,034. This area slightly increased its percent (from 40.7 to 41.1%) of the County’s total population between 2000 and 2010.

The Hispanic or Latino population increased by 61.3%, growing from 210,289 to 339,143. The Hispanic or Latino population now represents 48.2% of the area’s total population, an increase from 37.1% in 2000. The White population declined by 7.9%, decreasing from 282,234 to 259,850. The White population now represents 36.9% of the area’s total population, a decrease from 49.8% in 2000.

B e x a r C o u n t y G e o g r a p h i c A r e a s


The Black or African American population increased by 39.0%, growing from 46,326 to 64,376. The Black or African American population now represents 9.1% of the area’s total population, an increase from 8.2% in 2000. The Asian population increased by 58.4%, growing from 14,970 to 23,710. The Asian population now represents 3.4% of the area’s total population, an increase from 2.6% in 2000.

F a r S o u t h & N e a r S o u t h : G e o g r a p h i c A r e a s D & FOf the geographic areas located in southern Bexar County situated outside of Loop 410, Far South maintained its percent of the population at 2.3% and the Near South, increased from 2.9 to 3.2%. The Far South area had a growth rate of 27.5%, growing from 31,461 to 40,099. The Near South area had a growth rate of 36.2%, growing from 40,369 to 54,998.

The Hispanic or Latino population increased by 54.9%, growing from 40,310 to 62,428. The Hispanic or Latino population now represents 65.6% of the area’s total population, an increase from 56.1% in 2000. The White population declined by 0.3%, decreasing from 26,500 to 26,415. The White population now represents 27.8% of the area’s total population, a decrease from 36.9% in 2000. The Black or African American population increased by 21.7%, growing from 3,794 to 4,617. The Black or African American population now represents 4.9% of the area’s total population, a decrease from 5.3% in 2000. The Asian population increased by 120.8%, growing from 264 to 583. The Asian population now represents 0.6% of the area’s total population, an increase from 0.4% in 2000.

I n s i d e 4 1 0 : G e o g r a p h i c A r e a G The geographic area located in central Bexar County situated inside Loop 410 and excluding the Central Business District (CBD) had a lower growth rate (+0.6%) than any other geographic area between 2000 and 2010. The Inside 410 area added 4,048 people, growing from 658,452 to 662,500. This area’s percent of the County’s total population decreased from 47.3% to 38.6%.

The Hispanic or Latino population increased by 6.4%, growing from 481,773 to 512,479. The Hispanic or Latino population now represents 77.4% of the area’s total population, an increase from 73.2% in 2000. The White, Black or African American, and Asian populations all decreased as a percent of total population between 2000 and 2010 (-16.5%, -14.2%, and -4.5% respectively).

C e n t r a l B u s i n e s s D i s t r i c t : G e o g r a p h i c A r e a H The Central Business District (CBD) boundaries used in this analysis are those defi ned by the San Antonio, Texas, Code of Ordinances (Part II, Chapter 4, Article I , Sec 4-4). The CBD had the second lowest growth rate (+7.8%) of the geographic areas between 2000 and 2010. The CBD added 724 people, growing from 9,424 to 10,148. This area’s percent of the County’s total population decreased from 0.7% in 2000 to 0.6% in 2010.

The Hispanic or Latino population declined by 1.3%, decreasing from 5,980 to 5,902. The Hispanic or Latino population now represents 57.3% of the area’s total population, a decrease from 62.5% in 2000. The White and Black or African American populations increased in total population between 2000 and 2010, growing at a rate of 21.3% and 21.6% respectively. The Asian population increased by 110.3%, growing from 58 to 122. The Asian population now represents 1.2% of the area’s total population, an increase from 0.6% in 2000.


B E X A R C O U N T Y D E M O G R A P H I C C H A N G E S

P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t yThe total population increased by 23.1% from 1,392,931 to 1,714,773. The Hispanic or Latino population increased by 33.0% from 757,033 to 1,006,958. White population increased by 4.6% from 496,245 to 519,123. Black or African American population increased by 23.4% from 95,984 to 118,460. Asian population increased by 85.1% from 21,369 to 39,561.

H I G H L I G H T S :• Bexar County experienced a higher total population growth rate (+23.1%) than the City of

San Antonio (+15.9%) in its population increase from 1,392,931 in 2000 to 1,714,773 in 2010.

• Bexar County experienced growth in the: Hispanic or Latino (+33%); White (+4.6%); Black or African American (+23.4%) and Asian (+85.1%) populations, with the Hispanic or Latino population having the highest numeric growth (+249,925).

• Bexar County experienced male population numeric (+163,299) and percent (+24.1%) increases and female population numeric (+158,543) and percent (+22.2%) increases. Despite the greater increase in the male population, the male / female ratio (0.95) shows that females are still (slightly) in the majority.

• In 2000, the age distribution for Bexar County had somewhat equal numbers or percentages for almost all age groups and between genders as well as the expected decreasing proportions for the oldest age groups beginning around the 50 to 54 age group. In 2010, while the basic pattern of the age distribution is the same, the beginning of the decreasing proportions for the older age groups has shifted to around the 55 to 59 age group.

• Bexar County experienced increases in the: total population median age from 2000 (33.3) to 2010 (34.6); male population median age from 2000 (31.8) to 2010 (33.1); and the female population median age from 2000 (34.6) to 2010 (35.8).

Bexar CountyPopulation Race / Ethnicity

2000 U.S. Census

Hispanic or Latino757,03354.35%

All Other22,3001.60%

White496,24535.63%

Black or African

American95,9846.89%

Asian21,3691.53%

Bexar CountyPopulation Race / Ethnicity

2010 U.S. Census Asian39,5612.31%

Black or African

American118,4606.91%

White519,12330.27%

All Other30,6711.79%

Hispanic or Latino

1,006,95858.72%


B e x a r C o u n t y D e m o g r a p h i c C h a n g e s

G e n d e r G r o u p sBexar County’s male population increased by 24.1% from 677,541 to 840,840. Female population increased by 22.2% from 715,390 to 873,933.

Bexar CountyPopulation Pyramid 2000 U.S. Census

3.863.923.863.873.743.893.724.053.82

3.483.01

2.221.781.621.521.36

0.840.80

4.044.104.014.043.703.793.70

3.963.653.172.74

2.001.521.371.100.890.530.34

5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5

0 to 55 to 9

10 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 84

85+

Age

Cla

ss

Percent

% Female% Male

Bexar CountyPopulation Pyramid 2010 U.S. Census

3.713.753.663.723.803.87

3.523.523.333.533.27

2.912.46

1.741.331.090.880.87

3.88

0.440.540.821.05

1.502.15

2.563.07

3.383.243.363.49

3.893.984.013.823.85

5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5

0 to 55 to 9


85+

Age

Cla

ss

Percent

% Female% Male

M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 3.6% from 33.5 to 34.7. Median age of the male population increased by 3.8% from 32 to 33.2. Median age of the female population increased by 3.3% from 34.8 to 36.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eBexar County’s total households increased by 24.5% from 488,942 to 608,931. Family households increased by 20.4% from 345,717 to 416,356. Non family households increased by 34.5% from 143,225 to 192,575. (Non family households either consist of people living alone or households which do not have any members related to the householder.) The average size of households up to 7 persons declined (-1.1%) from 2.75 to 2.72.

Bexar CountyHousehold Size

2000 U.S. Census

4-person74,94015.33%

3-person85,71217.53%

2-person141,96329.03%

5-person39,5068.08% 1-person

117,12123.95%

6-person17,0773.49%

7-person or more12,6232.58%

Bexar CountyHousehold Size

2010 U.S. Census

1-person154,00925.29%

5-person48,8378.02%

2-person176,69229.02%3-person

102,65316.86%

4-person88,96814.61%

6-person21,5103.53%


1 0 C i t y o f S a n A n t o n i o

B e x a r C o u n t y D e m o g r a p h i c C h a n g e s

H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 16.1% from 202,363 to 234,943. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 16.2% from 200,503 to 233,059. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 8.3% from 133,545 to 144,632. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 45.5% from 13,732 to 19,977. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 28.6% from 53,226 to 68,450. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1.3% from 1,860 to 1,884. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 0.7% from 1,322 to 1,331. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 2.8% from 538 to 553.

Bexar CountyHousehold Type with 1+ Children Under Age 18

2000 U.S. Census

Family: Married Couple133,54565.99%

Non Family: Female

Householder538

0.27%

Family: Male Householder,

No Wife Present13,7326.79%

Family: Female

Housholder, No Husband

Present53,22626.30%

Non Family: Male

Householder1,3220.65%

Bexar CountyHousehold Type with 1+ Children Under Age 18

2010 U.S. Census Non Family:

Male Householder

1,3310.57%Family:

Female Housholder, No Husband

Present68,45029.13%



Non Family: Female

Householder553

0.24%


H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c yBexar County’s total housing units increased by 27.1% from 521,359 to 662,872. Occupied housing units increased by 24.6% from 488,942 to 608,931. Owner occupied housing units increased by 23.2% from 299,153 to 368,638. Renter occupied housing units increased by 27.6% from 189,789 to 240,293. Vacant housing units increased by 66.4% from 32,417 in 2000 to 53,941 in 2010.

Bexar CountyHousing Units

2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied299,15357.38%

Renter Occupied189,78936.40%

Vacant32,4176.22%

Bexar CountyHousing Units

2010 U.S. Census

Vacant53,9418.14%



1 1S a n A n t o n i o D e m o g r a p h i c D i s t r i b u t i o n & C h a n g e : 2 0 0 0 t o 2 0 1 0

P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t yCity of San Antonio’s total population increased by 15.9% from 1,144,646 to 1,326,539. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 24.9% from 671,394 to 838,454. White population declined by 3.2% from 364,357 to 352,858. Black or African American population increased by 11.4% from 74,778 to 83,302. Asian population increased by 78.9% from 17,084 to 30,562.

C I T Y O F S A N A N T O N I O

H I G H L I G H T S :• The City of San Antonio experienced a lower total population growth rate (+15.9%) than

Bexar County (+23.1%) in its population increase from 1,144,646 to 1,326,539.

• The City of San Antonio experienced growth in the Hispanic or Latino (+24.9%), Black or African American (+11.4%) and Asian (+78.9%) populations, with the Hispanic or Latino population having the highest numeric growth (+167,060). The White population group was the only major race / ethnicity group to decline (-3.2%).

• The City of San Antonio experienced male population numeric (+94,002) and percent (+17%) increases and female population numeric (+87,891) and percent increases (+14.9). Despite the greater increase in the male population, the male / female ratio (0.95) shows that females are still (slightly) in the majority.

• Both the 2000 and 2010 age distributions for the City of San Antonio are somewhat equal numbers and percentages for almost all age groups and between genders. However, a comparison of the two distributions also indicates that a higher proportion of the population is now in the older age groups.

• The City of San Antonio experienced increases in the: total population median age from 32.9 to 34.3; male population median age from 31.4 to 32.8; and the female population median age from 34.3 to 35.7.

City of San AntonioPopulation Race / Ethnicity

2000 U.S. Census


Other17,0331.49%

White 364,35731.83%

Black or African

American 74,7786.53%

Asian 17,0841.49%

City of San AntonioPopulation Race / Ethnicity

2010 U.S. Census Asian 30,5622.30%

Black or African

American 83,3026.28%

White 352,85826.60%

Other21,3631.61%



C i t y o f S a n A n t o n i o D e m o g r a p h i c C h a n g e s

G e n d e r G r o u p sCity of San Antonio’s male population increased by 17% from 553,245 to 647,247. Female population increased by 14.9% from 591,401 to 679,292.

City of San AntonioPopulation Pyramid 2000 U.S. Census

3.943.923.823.863.934.06

3.783.99

3.743.41

2.952.17

1.751.621.561.38

0.850.84

4.124.093.953.903.713.923.753.933.57

3.092.65

1.921.461.321.090.890.520.35

5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5

0 to 55 to 9


85+

Age

Cla

ss

Percent

% Female% Male

City of San AntonioPopulation Pyramid 2010 U.S. Census

4.034.013.904.084.384.30

3.773.743.563.803.55

3.172.70

1.901.471.231.020.99

4.124.19

4.074.304.424.30

3.753.613.453.623.33

2.772.31

1.601.130.900.61

0.49

5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5

0 to 55 to 9


85+

Age

Cla

ss

Percent

% Female% Male

M e d i a n A g eCity of San Antonio’s total population median age increased by 4.2% from 32.9 to 34.3. Median age of the male population increased by 4.4% from 31.4 to 32.8. Median age of the female population increased by 4.1% from 34.3 to 35.7.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eCity of San Antonio’s total households increased by 18.2% from 405,474 to 479,184. Family households increased by 13.2% from 280,828 to 317,862. Non family households increased by 29.4% from 124,646 to 161,322. The average size of households up to 7 persons declined by 2% from 2.74 to 2.69.

City of San AntonioHousehold Size

2000 U.S. Census

4-person60,33814.88%

3-person70,26417.33%

2-person115,30628.44%

5-person32,4818.01% 1-person

101,63425.07%

6-person14,3663.54%


City of San AntonioHousehold Size

2010 U.S. Census

1-person128,95026.91%

5-person37,2467.77%

2-person136,71428.53%

3-person79,51216.59%

4-person66,95613.97%

6-person16,7083.49%



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8City of San Antonio’s total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 8% from 166,020 to 179,279. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 8.1% from 164,432 to 177,804. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 1.4% from 106,356 to 104,902. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 38.3% from 11,604 to 16,044. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 22.3% from 46,472 to 56,858. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 7.1% from 1,588 to 1,475. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 9.5% from 1,135 to 1,027. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 1.1% from 453 to 448.

City of San AntonioHousehold Type with 1+ Children Under Age 18

2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder453

0.27%



Family: Female


Present46,47227.99%

Non Family: Male

Householder1,1350.68%

City of San AntonioHousehold Type with 1+ Children Under Age 18

2010 U.S. Census

Non Family: Male

Householder1,0270.57%Family:


Present56,85831.71%



Non Family: Female

Householder448

0.25%


H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c yCity of San Antonio’s total housing units increased by 20.9% from 433,122 to 523,759. Occupied housing units increased by 18.2% from 405,474 to 479,184. Owner occupied housing units increased by 15% from 235,699 to 271,044. Renter occupied housing units increased by 22.6% from 169,775 to 208,140. Vacant housing units increased by 61.2% from 27,648 to 44,575.

City of San AntonioHousing Units

2000 U.S. Census



Vacant27,6486.38%

City of San AntonioHousing Units

2010 U.S. Census

Vacant44,5758.51%




City Council Districts


S a n A n t o n i o C i t y C o u n c i l D i s t r i c t s

As a result of redistricting after the 2000 Census, each Council District had a relatively equal total population. Between 2000 and 2010 the population gain/loss varied among the Council Districts resulting in unequal total population amongst the Districts in 2010. The population of Council Districts 6, 8, and 9 grew at greater rates than the other Council Districts between 2000 and 2010 (+30.7%, +33.6%, and +36.7% respectively). Council Districts 1 and 5 experienced decreases in population (-4.0% and -3.3% respectively). These are the only two Council Districts that lost population. The remaining Council Districts, 2 (+13.7%), 3 (+5.9), 4 (+11.0%), 7 (+13.5), and 10 (+19.0%), grew moderately adding between 6,638 people and 21,269 people.

All Council Districts except for District 5 gained Hispanic or Latino population. The White population increased in Council Districts 5, 6, 8, and 9 and decreased in all other Districts. The Black or African American population decreased in Council Districts 2, 3, and 4 and increased in all other Districts. The Black or African American population increased the most between 2000 and 2010 in Council Districts 8, 9, and 10, growing at a rate of 66.3%, 70.5%, and 32.8% respectively. The Asian population decreased in Council Districts 4 and 5 and increased in all other Districts. The Asian population increased the most in Council Districts 8 and 9, growing at a rate of 148.4% and 167.6% respectively.

Population Change by Council Districts2000 - 2010

21,269(+19.0%)

42,781(+36.7%)40,171

(+33.6%)

16,391(+13.5%)

35,785(+30.7%)

-3,605(-3.3%)

12,222(+11.0%)

14,931(+13.7%)

-4,690(-4.0%)

6,638(+5.9%)

-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

CD2 CD3 CD4 CD5 CD6 CD7 CD8 CD9 CD10CD1

2010 Population by Council Districts

112,

446

123,

574

118,

855

123,

163

106,

608 152,

533

137,

533

159,

568

159,

214

133,

045

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

175,000

200,000Mean (132,654)

CD2 CD3 CD4 CD5 CD6 CD7 CD8 CD9 CD10CD1


C O U N C I L D I S T R I C T 1

P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 1 declined by 4%, declining from 117,136 to 112,446. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 1,188 or 1.4% from 85,823 to 87,011. White population declined by 22.2% from 26,736 to 20,810. Black or African American population increased by 1.6% from 2,558 to 2,598. Asian population increased by 12.3% from 778 to 874.

G e n d e r G r o u p s The male population declined 1.2% from 56,850 to 56,186. Female population declined by 6.7% from 60,286 to 56,260.

M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 4.5% from 34.3 to 35.8. The median age of the male population increased by 6.1% from 32.5 to 34.5. The median age of the female population increased by 3.6% from 36.0 to 37.4.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households declined by 2.4% from 43,264 to 42,207. Family households declined by 6.9% from 26,309 to 24,495. Non family households increased by 4.5% from 16,955 to` 17,712. The average size of households up to 7 persons declined by 1.1% from 2.56 to 2.53.

H I G H L I G H T S :• The largest numeric (-4,690) and percent (-4%) decline in total population took place in

Council District 1.

• The largest White population numeric decrease was in Council District 1 (-5,926).

• Council District 1 experienced the largest female population numeric (-4,026) and percent (-6.7%) decline.

• Council District 1 was the only district to experience a numeric (-1,716) and percent (-2%) decline in the age 18 and over total population. The largest numeric decline in age 18 and over White population took place in Council District 1 (-4,760).

• Council District 1 was the only district in which total households had a numeric (-1,057) and percent (-2.4%) decrease. This district had the largest numeric (-1,814) and percent (-6.9%) decrease in family households.


C o u n c i l D i s t r i c t 1

H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 11.4% from 15,043 to 13,335. Family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 11.3% from 14,870 to 13,197. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 18.5% from 8,852 to. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 6.2% from 1,322 to 1,404. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 2.4% from 4,696 to 4,583. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 20.2% from 173 to 138. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 17.5% from 120 to 99. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 declined by 26.4% from 53 to 39.

Council District 1Household Type with 1+ Children Under Age 18

2000 U.S. Census

Family: Married Couple8,852

58.84%

Non Family: Female

Householder53

0.35%


No Wife Present

1,3228.79%

Family: Female


Present4,696

31.22%

Non Family: Male

Householder120

0.80%



Male Householder

990.74%Family:


Present4,583

34.37%


No Wife Present

1,40410.53%

Non Family: Female

Householder39

0.29%


54.07%

H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by 0.04% from 47,027 to 47,047. Occupied housing units declined by 2.4% from 43,264 to 42,207. Owner occupied housing units declined 5% from 21,503 to 20,435. Renter occupied housing units increased by 0.05% from 21,761 to 21,772. Vacant housing units increased by 28.6% from 3,763 to 4,840.

Council District 1Housing Units

2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

21,50345.72%

Renter Occupied

21,76146.27%

Vacant3,7638.00%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant4,840

10.29%

Renter Occupied

21,77246.28%

Owner Occupied

20,43543.44%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y Council District 2’s total population increased by 14,931 or 13.7% from 108,643 to 123,574. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 17,922 or 36.5% from 49,147 to 67,069. White population decreased by -1,658 or -7.3% from 22,818 to 21,160. Black or African American population decreased by -2,065 or -6.3% from 32,939 to 30,874. Asian population increased by 145 or 7.8% from 1,868 to 2,013.

G e n d e r G r o u p s Council District 2’s male population increased by 8,325 or 16% from 52,030 to 60,355. Female population increased by 6,606 or 11.7% from 56,613 to 63,219.

M e d i a n A g eCouncil District 2’s total population median age remained the same at 32.3. Median age of the male population increased by 0.5 or 1.6% from 30.1 to 30.6. Median age of the female population decreased by -0.3 or -0.9% from 34.3 to 34.0.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 3,756 or 10% from 37,405 to 41,161. Family households increased by 2,109 or 8.1% from 26,104 to 28,213. Non family households increased by 1,647 or 14.6% from 11,301 to 12,948. The average size of households up to 7 persons increased by 0.05 or 1.7% from 2.79 to 2.84.

H I G H L I G H T S :• The largest Black or African American population was in Council District 2 for 2000

(32,939) as well as 2010 (30,874), however this district also had the largest numeric decrease (-2,065) in that population.

• The largest age 18 and over Black or African American population was in Council District 2 in 2000 (23,317) and 2010 (22,632), however this district also experienced the largest numeric decline (-685) in that population.

• The average size of all Council District 2 households up to seven persons had the highest numeric and percent increase (+0.05 / +1.68%).



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,040 or 6.4% from 16,114 to 17,154. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,068 or 6.7% from 15,949 to 17,017. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -129 or -1.5% from 8,536 to 8,407. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 421 or 33.5% from 1,256 to 1,677. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 776 or 12.6% from 6,157 to 6,933. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -28 or -17% from 165 to 137. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -9 or -8.7% from 104 to 95. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -19 or -31.1% from 61 to 42.



Male Householder

1040.65%Family:


Present6,157

38.21%


No Wife Present

1,2567.79%

Non Family: Female

Householder61

0.38%


52.97%



Male Householder

950.55%Family:


Present6,933

40.42%


No Wife Present

1,6779.78%

Non Family: Female

Householder42

0.24%


49.01%

H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by by 6,140 or 15% from 40,856 to 46,996. Occupied housing units increased by 3,756 or 10% from 37,405 to 41,161. Owner occupied housing units increased by 577 or 2.7% from 21,145 to 21,722. Renter occupied housing units increased by 3,179 or 19.6% from 16,260 to 19,439. Vacant housing units increased by 2,384 or 69.1% from 3,451 to 5,835.


2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

21,14551.75%Renter

Occupied16,26039.80%

Vacant3,4518.45%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant5,835

12.42%

Renter Occupied

19,43941.36%

Owner Occupied

21,72246.22%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 3 increased by 6,638 or 5.9% from 112,217 to 118,855. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 12,932 or 14.9% from 86,694 to 99,626. White population decreased by -5,691 or -28.1% from 20,271 to 14,580. Black or African American population decreased by -329 or -8.5% from 3,861 to 3,532. Asian population increased by 10 or 3% from 335 to 345.

G e n d e r G r o u p s The male population increased by 3,731 or 6.9% from 54,040 to 57,771. Female population increased by 2,907 or 5% from 58,177 to 61,084.

M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 1.8 or 5.7% from 31.9 to 33.7. Median age of the male population increased by 1.9 or 6.5% from 29.9 to 31.8. Median age of the female population increased by 1.7 or 5% from 33.6 to 35.3.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 2,683 or 7.3% from 36,841 to 39,524. Family households increased by 1,170 or 4.3% from 27,437 to 28,607. Non family households increased by 1,513 or 16.1% from 9,404 to 10,917. The average size of households up to 7 persons decreased by -0.03 or -1% from 2.95 to 2.92.

H I G H L I G H T S :• Council District 3 had the second highest number decrease (-5,691) and the largest percent

(-28.1%) decrease from 2000 (20,271) to 2010 (14,580) in White population.

• Council District 3 had the lowest number (+10) and percent (+3%) increase in Asian population from 2000 (335) to 2010 (345).

• The largest percent decrease in the age 18 and over White population took place in Council District 3 (-26.5%).

• Council District 3 had the lowest number (+35) and percent (+1.3%) increase in Age 18 or over Black or African American population from 2000 (2,636) to 2010 (2,671).



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 declined by -210 or -1.2% from 16,937 to 16,727. Family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -196 or -1.2% from 16,800 to 16,604. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -1,200 or -12% from 9,978 to 8,778. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 359 or 25.8% from 1,393 to 1,752. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 645 or 11.9% from 5,429 to 6,074. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -14 or -10.2% from 137 to 123. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -14 or -16.1% from 87 to 73. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 remained the same at 50.


2000 U.S. Census


58.91%

Non Family: Female

Householder50

0.30%


No Wife Present

1,3938.22%

Family: Female


Present5,429

32.05%

Non Family: Male

Householder87

0.51%



Male Householder

730.44%

Family: Female


Present6,074

36.31%


No Wife Present

1,75210.47%

Non Family: Female

Householder50

0.30%


52.48%

H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by 10.2% from 39,537 in 2000 to 43,578 in 2010. Occupied housing units increased by 7.3% from 36,841 in 2000 to 39,524 in 2010. Owner occupied housing units increased by 3.3% from 23,072 in 2000 to 23,840 in 2010. Renter occupied housing units increased by 13.9% from 13,769 in 2000 to 15,684 in 2010. Vacant housing units increased by 50.4% from 2,696 in 2000 to 4,054 in 2010.


2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

23,07258.36%

Renter Occupied

13,76934.83%

Vacant2,6966.82%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant4,0549.30%

Renter Occupied

15,68435.99%

Owner Occupied

23,84054.71%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 4 increased by 12,222 or 11% from 110,941 to 123,163. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 17,317 or 20% from 86,514 to 103,831. White population decreased by -4,096 or -23.8% from 17,188 to 13,092. Black or African American population decreased by -840 or -17.4% from 4,821 to 3,981. Asian population decreased by -25 or -2.7% from 934 to 909.

G e n d e r G r o u p s The male population increased by 5,908 or 10.9% from 54,214 to 60,122. Female population increased by 6,314 or 11.1% from 56,727 to 63,041.

M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 1.9 or 6.4% from 28.9 to 30.8. Median age of the male population increased by 1.8 or 6.6% from 27.5 to 29.3. Median age of the female population increased by 1.9 or 6.3% from 30.3 to 32.2.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 4,555 or 14.1% from 32,261 to 36,816. Family households increased by 2,604 or 9.8% from 26,677 to 29,281. Non family households increased by 1,951 or 34.9% from 5,584 to 7,535. The average size of households up to 7 persons decreased by -0.09 or -2.6% from 3.36 to 3.27.

H I G H L I G H T S :• Council District 4 had the largest Black or African American population percent (-17.4%)

decrease.

• In 2000, Council District 4’s population distribution had much higher proportions of younger populations and steadily declining older populations. In 2010 the population distribution is slightly more equitable between all but the oldest population groups.

• Council District 4 continues to have the lowest median age for the: total population (30.8); male population (29.3); and female population (32.2).

• Council District 4 had the largest percent decrease in the age 18 and over Black or African American population (-8.6%).

• Council District 4 had the highest average size of households up to 7 persons in 2000 (3.36) and 2010 (3.27).



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 741 or 4.3% from 17,420 to 18,161. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 743 or 4.3% from 17,308 to 18,051. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -980 or -8.7% from 11,229 to 10,249. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 518 or 42.1% from 1,230 to 1,748. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,205 or 24.9% from 4,849 to 6,054. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -2 or -1.8% from 112 to 110. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 remained the same at 83. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -2 or -6.9% from 29 to 27.


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder29

0.17%


No Wife Present

1,2307.06%

Family: Female


Present4,849

27.84%

Non Family: Male

Householder83

0.48%


2010 U.S. Census Non Family: Male

Householder83

0.46%Family: Female


Present6,054

33.34%


No Wife Present

1,7489.63%

Non Family: Female

Householder27

0.15%


H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by 5,966 or 17.5% from 34,090 to 40,056. Occupied housing units increased by 4,555 or 14.1% from 32,261 to 36,816. Owner occupied housing units increased by 2,423 or 11.5% from 21,136 to 23,559. Renter occupied housing units increased by 2,132 or 19.2% from 11,125 to 13,257. Vacant housing units increased by 1,411 or 77.1% from 1,829 to 3,240.


2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

21,13662.00%

Renter Occupied

11,12532.63%

Vacant1,8295.37%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant3,2408.09%

Renter Occupied

13,25733.10% Owner

Occupied23,55958.82%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 5 decreased by -3,605 or -3.3% from 110,213 to 106,608. Hispanic or Latino population decreased by -4,023 or -3.9% from 103,551 to 99,528. White population increased by 150 or 3.3% from 4,547 to 4,697. Black or African American population increased by 399 or 28.2% from 1,417 to 1,816. Asian population decreased by -39 or -24.5% from 159 to 120.

G e n d e r G r o u p s The male population decreased by -1,123 or -2% from 54,804 to 53,681. Female population decreased by -2,482 or -4.5% from 55,409 to 52,927.

M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 2.3 or 7.3% from 31 to 33.2. Median age of the male population increased by 2.4 or 8.1% from 29.2 to 31.6. Median age of the female population increased by 2.1 or 6.5% from 32.8 to 34.9.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 557 or 1.8% from 31,696 to 32,253. Family households decreased by -1,228 or -4.9% from 24,816 to 23,588. Non family households increased by 1,785 or 25.9% from 6,880 to 8,665. The average size of households up to 7 persons decreased by -0.17 or -5.2% from 3.24 to 3.07.

H I G H L I G H T S :• In 2000, the largest Hispanic or Latino population was in Council District 5 (103,551)

however this district also had the largest numeric (-4,023) and percent (-3.9%) decrease, making it the third largest in 2010 (99,528). The largest Asian population numeric (-39) and percent (-24.5%) decrease was in this district.

• Council District 5 experienced the largest male population numeric (-1,123) and percent (-2.1%) decrease.

• Council District 5 experienced the highest total population median age numeric (+2.3) and percent increase (+7.3%). This district had the highest male population median age numeric (+2.4) and percent increase (+8.1%). It had the highest female population median age numeric (+2.1) and percent increase (+6.5%).

• Council District 5 had the highest 2000 age 18 and over Hispanic or Latino population (70,505), however it was also the only district that experienced a numeric (-580) and percent (-0.8%) decrease in that population group. It also experienced the only numeric (-21) and percent (-16.4%) decrease in the age 18 and over Asian population.



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -1,540 or -10.1% from 15,314 to 13,774. Family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -1,511 or -9.9% from 15,210 to 13,699. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -2,212 or -25% from 8,842 to 6,630. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 134 or 10.7% from 1,254 to 1,388. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 567 or 11.1% from 5,114 to 5,681. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -29 or -27.9% from 104 to 75. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -28 or -36.8% from 76 to 48. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -1 or -3.6% from 28 to 27.


2000 U.S. Census


57.74%

Non Family: Female

Householder28

0.18%


No Wife Present

1,2548.19%

Family: Female


Present5,114

33.39%

Non Family: Male

Householder76

0.50%



Male Householder

480.35%Family:


Present5,681

41.24%


No Wife Present

1,38810.08%

Non Family: Female

Householder27

0.20%


48.13%

H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by 1,763 or 5.2% from 33,758 to 35,521. Occupied housing units increased by 557 or 1.8% from 31,696 to 32,253. Owner occupied housing units decreased by -1,101 or -5.6% from 19,516 to 18,415. Renter occupied housing units increased by 1,658 or 13.6% from 12,180 to 13,838. Vacant housing units increased by 1,206 or 58.5% from 2,062 to 3,268.


2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

19,51657.81%

Renter Occupied

12,18036.08%

Vacant2,0626.11%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant3,2689.20%

Renter Occupied

13,83838.96%

Owner Occupied

18,41551.84%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 6 increased by 35,785 or 30.7% from 116,748 to 152,533. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 31,023 or 40.9% from 75,765 to 106,788. White population increased by 1,240 or 4.3% from 28,890 to 30,130. Black or African American population increased by 1,863 or 22.8% from 8,159 to 10,022. Asian population increased by 834 or 46.4% from 1,796 to 2,630.



H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 13,910 or 36.8% from 37,801 to 51,711. Family households increased by 8,545 or 29% from 29,439 to 37,984. Non family households increased by 5,365 or 64.2% from 8,362 to 13,727. The average size of households up to 7 persons decreased by -0.14 or -4.4% from 3.05 to 2.92.

H I G H L I G H T S :• Council District 6 had the largest Hispanic or Latino population numeric increase (+31,023)

making it the district with the largest Hispanic or Latino population (106,788) in 2010.

• Council District 6 had the highest Hispanic or Latino age 18 and over population in 2010 (+71,490) as well as the highest numeric change (+22,525).

• Council District 6 had the highest percent increase in total households (+36.8) and non family households (+64.2%).

• In 2010 Council District 6 still had the highest number of total households with one or more children under the age of 18 (23,073) and family households with one or more children under the age of 18 (22,897). It had the highest numeric (+11) and percent (+6.7%) increase in non family households with one or more children under the age of 18.



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 3,806 or 19.8% from 19,267 to 23,073. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 3,795 or 19.9% from 19,102 to 22,897. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 940 or 7.2% from 13,037 to 13,977. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 782 or 64.2% from 1,219 to 2,001. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 2,073 or 42.8% from 4,846 to 6,919. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 11 or 6.7% from 165 to 176. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 2 or 1.5% from 130 to 132. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 9 or 25.7% from 35 to 44.


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder35

0.18%


No Wife Present

1,2196.33%

Family: Female


Present4,846

25.15%

Non Family: Male

Householder130

0.67%



Male Householder

1320.57%Family:


Present6,919

29.99%


No Wife Present

2,0018.67%

Non Family: Female

Householder44

0.19%




2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

24,28761.56%

Renter Occupied

13,51434.25%

Vacant1,6544.19%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant3,4756.30%

Renter Occupied

19,67435.65%

Owner Occupied

32,03758.05%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 7 increased by 16,391 or 13.5% from 121,142 to 137,533. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 18,105 or 23.5% from 77,026 to 95,131. White population decreased by -3,703 or -10.2% from 36,179 to 32,476. Black or African American population increased by 796 or 18.3% from 4,342 to 5,138. Asian population increased by 830 or 43% from 1,931 to 2,761.



H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 7,078 or 16.7% from 42,355 to 49,433. Family households increased by 3,445 or 11.3% from 30,530 to 33,975. Non family households increased by 3,633 or 30.7% from 11,825 to 15,458. The average size of households up to 7 persons decreased by -0.06 or -2.11% from 2.78 to 2.72.

H I G H L I G H T S :• In 2000 Council District 7 had the highest total population (121,142) and due to having the

fi fth highest number increase (+16,391) and the sixth highest percent increase (+13.5%), its total population in 2010 (137,533) fell to fourth place.

• In 2000 Council District 7 had the highest male population (57,769) but its sixth highest number increase (+7,972) and percent increase (+13.8%) put its 2010 number of males in fourth place (65,741).

• In 2000 Council District 7 had the highest female population (63,373) but its fi fth highest number increase (+8,419) and percent increase (+13.3%) put its 2010 number of females in fourth place (71,792).

• In 2000 Council District 7 had the highest number of family households (30,530) but its fi fth highest number increase (+3,445) and percent increase (+11.3%) put its 2010 number of family households in fi fth place (33,975).



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,026 or 5.8% from 17,636 to 18,662. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,039 or 5.9% from 17,480 to 18,519. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -653 or -5.6% from 11,739 to 11,086. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 501 or 44.2% from 1,133 to 1,634. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,191 or 25.8% from 4,608 to 5,799. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -13 or -8.3% from 156 to 143. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -14 or -12.3% from 114 to 100. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1 or 2.4% from 42 to 43.


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder42

0.24%


No Wife Present

1,1336.42%

Family: Female


Present4,608

26.13%

Non Family: Male

Householder114

0.65%



Male Householder

1000.54%

Family: Female


Present5,799

31.07%


No Wife Present

1,6348.76%

Non Family: Female

Householder43

0.23%


H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by 8,989 or 20.3% from 44,327 to 53,316. Occupied housing units increased by 7,078 or 16.7% from 42,355 to 49,433. Owner occupied housing units increased by 3,746 or 14% from 26,850 to 30,596. Renter occupied housing units increased by 3,332 or 21.5% from 15,505 to 18,837. Vacant housing units increased by 1,911 or 96.9% from 1,972 to 3,883.


2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

26,85060.57%

Renter Occupied

15,50534.98%

Vacant1,9724.45%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant3,8837.28%

Renter Occupied

18,83735.33%

Owner Occupied

30,59657.39%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 8 increased by 40,171 or 33.6% from 119,397 to 159,568. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 25,191 or 57.2% from 44,020 to 69,211. White population increased by 3,662 or 5.8% from 63,105 to 66,767. Black or African American population increased by 3,523 or 66.3% from 5,310 to 8,833. Asian population increased by 6,505 or 148.4% from 4,384 to 10,889.


M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 0.3 or 0.8% from 33.8 to 34.1. Median age of the male population increased by 0.10 or 0.2% from 33.0 to 33.1. Median age of the female population increased by 0.3 or 1% from 34.5 to 34.9.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 16,357 or 31.8% from 51,415 to 67,772. Family households increased by 7,464 or 25.4% from 29,361 to 36,825. Non family households increased by 8,893 or 40.3% from 22,054 to 30,947. The average size of households up to 7 persons remained the same at 2.28.

H I G H L I G H T S :• The largest Black or African American population numeric increase took place in Council

District 8 (+3,523). This district had the largest Asian population in 2000 (4,384) and in 2010 (10,889) as well as the largest numeric increase (+6,505).

• In 2010 Council District 8 had the highest male population (77,722).

• Most Council Districts have variations of the standard population age distribution with the largest proportions in the youngest age groups with a steady decline in older age groups, however in both 2000 and 2010, Council District 8 had the most unique population age distributions with a very low proportion of population in the youngest age groups, a dramatic increase in the 20 to 29 age groups, and a sharper decline than is typical in the 30-59 age groups.

• Council District 8 had the highest number of total housing units in 2000 (55,069) and 2010 (74,035). This district had the largest number of renter occupied housing units in 2000 (27,714) and with the largest numeric (+9442) increase, it still had the highest number in 2010 (37,156). It had the largest numeric (+2,609) increase in vacant housing units giving it the largest number in 2010 (6,263).



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 3,185 or 20.6% from 15,488 to 18,673. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 3,192 or 20.9% from 15,276 to 18,468. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,422 or 13.5% from 10,526 to 11,948. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 507 or 54.1% from 938 to 1,445. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,263 or 33.1% from 3,812 to 5,075. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -7 or -3.3% from 212 to 205. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -7 or -4.9% from 143 to 136. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 remained the same at 69.


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder69

0.45%


No Wife Present

9386.06%

Family: Female


Present3,812

24.61%

Non Family: Male

Householder143

0.92%



Male Householder

1360.73%Family:


Present5,075

27.18%


No Wife Present

1,4457.74%

Non Family: Female

Householder69

0.37%




2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

23,70143.04%

Renter Occupied

27,71450.33%

Vacant3,6546.64%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant6,2638.46%

Renter Occupied

37,15650.19%

Owner Occupied

30,61641.35%



P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 9 increased by 42,781 or 36.7% from 116,433 to 159,214. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 25,757 or 82% from 31,396 to 57,153. White population increased by 8,904 or 11.6% from 76,885 to 85,789. Black or African American population increased by 2,639 or 70.5% from 3,744 to 6,383. Asian population increased by 4,215 or 167.6% from 2,515 to 6,730.



H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 17,527 or 36.1% from 48,512 to 66,039. Family households increased by 10,021 or 33% from 30,326 to 40,347. Non family households increased by 7,506 or 41.3% from 18,186 to 25,692. The average size of households up to 7 persons increased by 0.01 or 0.5% from 2.36 to 2.37.

H I G H L I G H T S :• The largest total population numeric (+42,781) and percent (+36.7%) increase took place in

Council District 9.

• Council District 9 experienced the largest Hispanic or Latino population percent increase (+ 82%). This district had the largest White population in 2000 (76,885) and in 2010 (85,789). It also experienced the largest White population numeric and percent increase (+8,904 / +11.6%). The largest percent increases in the Black or African American population (+70.5%) and Asian population (+167.6%) were also in this district.

• In 2010, Council District 9 had the highest female population (81,998). This district had the highest male population numeric (+21,222) and percent (+37.9%) increase and the highest female population numeric (+21,559) and percent (+35.7%) increase.

• In 2000, Council District 9 had population age distribution with lower populations in the youngest age groups, and a noticeable increase in the populations in and around the “Baby Boomer” ages. The age distribution is much more equitable in 2010.



H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 4,968 or 30.4% from 16,317 to 21,285. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 4,962 or 30.7% from 16,154 to 21,116. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 2,738 or 22.5% from 12,163 to 14,901. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 608 or 75% from 811 to 1,419. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,616 or 50.8% from 3,180 to 4,796. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 6 or 3.7% from 163 to 169. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -2 or -1.6% from 128 to 126. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 8 or 22.9% from 35 to 43.


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder35

0.21%


No Wife Present

8114.97%

Family: Female


Present3,180

19.49%

Non Family: Male

Householder128

0.78%


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder51

0.31%


No Wife Present

1,0486.36%

Family: Female


Present3,781

22.94%

Non Family: Male

Householder150

0.91%



2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

27,12651.84%

Renter Occupied

21,38640.87%

Vacant3,8147.29%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant6,1348.50%

Renter Occupied

29,62041.04%

Owner Occupied

36,41950.46%


C O U N C I L D I S T R I C T 1 0

P o p u l a t i o n R a c e / E t h n i c i t y The total population in Council District 10 increased by 21,269 or 19% from 111,776 to 133,045. Hispanic or Latino population increased by 21,648 or 68.8% from 31,458 to 53,106. White population decreased by -4,381 or -6.5% from 67,738 to 63,357. Black or African American population increased by 2,498 or 32.8% from 7,627 to 10,125. Asian population increased by 907 or 38% from 2,384 to 3,291.


M e d i a n A g eThe total population median age increased by 1.5 or 4.2% from 35.7 to 37.2. Median age of the male population increased by 1.0 or 2.8% from 34.6 to 35.5. Median age of the female population increased by 2 or 5.4% from 36.5 to 38.5.

H o u s e h o l d T y p e b y H o u s e h o l d S i z eThe total households increased by 8,344 or 19% from 43,924 to 52,268. Family households increased by 4,718 or 15.8% from 29,829 to 34,547. Non family households increased by 3,626 or 25.7% from 14,095 to 17,721. The average size of households up to 7 persons remained the same at 2.52.

H I G H L I G H T S :• In 2000, Council District 10 had population age distribution with lower populations in the

youngest age groups, and a noticeable increase in the populations in and around the “Baby Boomer” ages. The age distribution is much more equitable in 2010.

• In 2000 Council District 10 had the second lowest number of Hispanics or Latinos (31,458) and despite having the seventh highest number increase (+21,648) and the second highest percent increase (+68.8%), it had the lowest number of Hispanics in 2010 (53,106).

• In 2000 Council District 10 had the highest number of owner occupied housing units, (27,363) however by 2010 it had dropped to second place with 33,405 owner occupied housing units.

• Council District 10 had the highest numeric increase in renter occupied housing units with householders 75 and up (+223).


C o u n c i l D i s t r i c t 1 0

H o u s e h o l d s w i t h O n e o r M o r e C h i l d r e n u n d e r A g e 1 8The total households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,951 or 11.8% from 16,484 to 18,435. Family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,953 or 12% from 16,283 to 18,236. Married couple family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 262 or 2.3% from 11,454 to 11,716. Male householder (no wife present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 528 or 50.4% from 1,048 to 1,576. Female householder (no husband present) family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 1,163 or 30.8% from 3,781 to 4,944. Non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -2 or -1% from 201 to 199. Male householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 decreased by -15 or -10% from 150 to 135. Female householder non family households with one or more children under age 18 increased by 13 or 25.5% from 51 to 64.


2000 U.S. Census


Non Family: Female

Householder51

0.31%


No Wife Present

1,0486.36%

Family: Female


Present3,781

22.94%

Non Family: Male

Householder150

0.91%



Male Householder

1350.73%

Family: Female


Present4,944

26.82%


No Wife Present

1,5768.55%

Non Family: Female

Householder64

0.35%


H o u s i n g U n i t O c c u p a n c y o r V a c a n c y The total housing units increased by 9,174 or 19.7% from 46,677 to 55,851. Occupied housing units increased by 8,344 or 19% from 43,924 to 52,268. Owner occupied housing units increased by 6,042 or 22.1% from 27,363 to 33,405. Renter occupied housing units increased by 2,302 or 13.9% from 16,561 to 18,863. Vacant housing units increased by 830 or 30.1% from 2,753 to 3,583.


2000 U.S. Census

Owner Occupied

27,36358.62%

Renter Occupied

16,56135.48%

Vacant2,7535.90%


2010 U.S. Census

Vacant3,5836.42%

Renter Occupied

18,86333.77%

Owner Occupied

33,40559.81%


S F 1 D a t a s e tThe U.S. Census SF 1 are released as individual fi les with identical tables for each state. Data for the states and their sub areas are provided in hierarchical sequence down to the block level (P & H tables), the census tract level (PCT & HCT tables), or the county level (PCO tables), depending on the detail shown in the table. The fi le structure includes, but is not limited to the following geographic levels: State; County; County subdivision; Place (such as the City of San Antonio); Census tract; Block group; and Block. The U.S. Census Bureau’s Web site (www.census.gov) provides SF 1 Flat ASCII fi les by state for download via File Transfer Protocol (FTP). Components include a fi xed-length ASCII format geographic header data and 47 comma-separated ASCII format data fi les with multiple tables each. From this ASCII format, data can be extracted for a particular area (such as Bexar and Medina Counties – Two Blocks within the City of San Antonio are in Medina County) and converted using a software package such as Microsoft Offi ce Access into several formats, including databases, spreadsheets, and for use with GIS (mapping) applications.

R e s o l u t i o n o f D a t aIn the 2010 Census SF 1 data there are 331 tables at various county and sub-county geographic area resolutions with a total of 5,960 variables. The fi nest resolution data is at the block level with Bexar County having almost 20,000 blocks in 2000 and over 26,000 blocks in 2010. Not all data is available at the block level. For instance, the homeless population data, compiled for the fi rst time in the 2010 census, is only available at the much larger tract level (366 tracts in the 2010).

C O S A P o p u l a t i o n C a l c u l a t i o n v e r s u s C e n s u s B u r e a u C a l c u l a t i o n sThe reported 2010 total population for the City of San Antonio by the U.S. Census Bureau is 1,327,407. Once the 2000 and 2010 SF 1 for Bexar and Medina counties had been obtained and converted to a usable GIS format, blocks with a place value indicating a designation as being within the City of San Antonio (PLACENS = 02411774) were selected. The blocks along the City of San Antonio boundary were then visually compared with the offi cial City of San Antonio boundaries and those of other cities & towns. It was determined that the Census Bureau had assigned 35 census blocks with a total population of 868, to the City of San Antonio that are actually outside of the City and include portions of the cities of Leon Valley, Balcones Heights, Hill Country Village, Windcrest and Kirby. This report excludes those 868 people giving the City of San Antonio a total population of 1,326,539 for 2010.

P r o c e d u r e t o A s s i g n B l o c k s t o C o u n c i l D i s t r i c t A r e a sIf the central point of a census block fell inside a Council District, that blocks value’s were assigned to that Council District. A visual review of the Council District boundaries, Council District symbolized blocks and aerial photography ensured correct assignments.

M E T H O D O L O G Y


F o r a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n , c o n t a c t :

D e p a r t m e n t o f P l a n n i n g & C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t

P . O . B o x 8 3 9 9 6 6

S a n A n t o n i o , T X 7 8 2 8 3 - 3 9 6 6

( 2 1 0 ) 2 0 7 - 0 1 4 7

w w w . s a n a n t o n i o . g o v / p l a n n i n g

Documents

D EMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION AND CHANGE 2000 TO 2010 …...San Antonio Demographic Distribution & Change: 2000 to 2010 3 P OPULATION COMPARISONS Population Comparison with Major Cities