Upload
duongmien
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
CYTOGENETICS OF Aequidens plagiozonatus KULLANDER, 1984 AND Crenicichla
lepidota HECKEL, 1840 (PERCIFORMES: CICHLIDAE) FROM THE UPPER
PARAGUAI BASIN – MT, CENTRAL BRAZIL.
Claudineia Barbosa De Lima1; Anderson Fernandes2; Ilsamar Mendes Soares2; Daniel
Garcia Silva² & Jorge Abdala Dergam1 (1Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade
Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, Brasil, [email protected]; 2Departamento
de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, 78300-000, Tangará da
Serra, MT, Brasil, [email protected] )
Index Terms: fish fauna; C banding; NOR banding; chromosome arm; ichthyology
Introduction
Although the Neotropical freshwater fish fauna is considered the richest in the world
(Schaefer, 1998), the knowledge of the fishes of the Cerrado is still scanty. The Cerrado is
one of the biodiversity hotspots in Brazil and in the last 35 years more than half of its 2
million km2 have been altered for agriculture.
Within the neotropics the Cichlidae are well represented, with 111 and 291 species
in Central America and South America. Cichlids are diurnal and characteristic of lenthic
environments, although some species are adapted to lotic habitats. They are nest builders
and show parental care (Kullander, 2003). The genus Crenicichla is endemic to South
America, and includes 74 valid species (Kullander, 2003). Five species, C. lepidota, C.
haroldoi, C. vittata, C. jupaiensis e C. semifasciata are currently known in the upper
Paraguai basin, and a karyotypic analysis of the former is reported in this study. With 23
species, the genus Aequidens is less speciose than Crenicichla and only one species,
Aequidens plagiozonatus, has been described in the upper rio Paraguai. This taxonomic
paucity contrasts with the occurrence of 14 species of Aequidens described for the Amazon
basin. To date, cytogenetic studies have been carried on in only 28 species of Crenicichla
2
and Aequidens (http://www.fihsbase.org.search.cfm). This work aimed to characterize
cytogenetic aspects of populations of C. lepidota and A. plagiozonatus in the upper Paraguai
drainage.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-one specimens of Aequidens plagiozonatus (8 females and 13 males) were
collected in the Bocaiuval Spring and in the Sepotuba River. Fourteen specimens of
Crenicichla lepidota (five females and nine males) were collected in the Piracema locality
(Fig. 1). Renal tissue was processed according to Bertollo et al. (1978), C banding, NOR
banding, and fluorochrome techniques followed Sumner (1972), Howell & Black (1980)
and Schweizer (1980) respectively. Chromosome arm relationships were determined
according to Levan et al. (1964).
Results & Discussion
Both species were 2n=48 (Table 1 and Fig. 1) and sex chromosomes were not
detected. C. lepidota was characterized by 4m+4sm+40 st-t chromosome formula and NF=
56. In this species, a large interstitial secondary constriction was evident in the long arm of
the largest chromosome pair (Fig. 1c); this same region was also NOR+ and DAPI - (Figs 1c
and 2a).
Populations of A. plagiozonatus showed two allopatric cytotypes. In corrego
Bocaiuval, the population was characterized by a 4st+44t chromosome formula and NF=52
(Fig. 1a) and it was named cytotype A. Twenty kilometers away from Bocaiuval, another
cytotype was collected in a lagoon close to the rio Sepotuba; this cytotype had
6sm+12stT+30t and NF=66 (Fig. 1b) and it was named cytotype B. Both cytotypes showed
heterochromatic blocks restricted to a pair of subtelocentrics, which were also associated to
NORs, and DAPI- (Figs 1 and 2b).
3
C. lepidota and both cytotypes of A. plagiozonatus showed chromosomes with
heterochromatic regions in the pericentromeric regions, but heterochromatic regions were
more evident in telocentric chromosomes.
Table 1. Locales and cytogenetic data of Aequidens and Crenicichla from the Upper
Paraguai River basin.
Cytotypes Collecting locales
(GPS)
Diploid
chromos
ome
number
Karyotypic
Formula
Fundamen
tal
Number
Crenicichla
lepidota
P1-Piracema
(14º39`03`` S
57º26`14`` O)
48 4m+4sm+40
a 56
A. plagiozonatus
Citótipo A
P1- Córrego São José
(14º37`01`` S
57º20`25`` O)
48 4st+44a 52
A. plagiozonatus
Citótipo B
P2- Córrego
Bocaiuval
(14º32`08`` S
57º37`12`` O)
48 6sm+12st+3
0a 66
Crenicichla species are characterized by a stable diploid number (twenty-eight
species are 2n=48) but their chromosome formulae and fundamental numbers show great
variation among species (http://www.fihsbase.org.search.cfm). The Upper Paraguai
population of C. lepidota species also shows distinctive chromosome formula (Table 1)
differing from other species of the genus. Another more southern C. lepidota population
from the Paraguay River was described by Feldberg & Bertollo (1985a) as having three
pairs of m-sm and 21 pairs of st-t. The karyotypes of both populations differ in many
4
respects: there are three pairs of m-sm in Miranda while four pairs of m-sm occurred in
Piracema.
All Cichlidae are characterized by the presence of a single pair of NORs, always
present in the largest chromosome pair (Feldberg et al., 2003). In some cases, a secondary
constriction is also evident in the NOR region. In Crenicichla, this region is interstitial in all
species and it may occur on the short or on the long arm of the first chromosome pair.
Feldberg & Bertollo (1985b) analyzed three species from different Brazilian basins and
found high levels of variation in NOR patterns among species. In C. lacustris and C. vitatta,
the NOR region was interstitial and present on the short arm, while in C. lepidota it was
interstitial and on the long arm. NORs of C.niederleinii from Tibagi River (Upper Paraná)
and Crenicichla sp. from the coastal basin of Itajaí-Açu River were characterized by
Loureiro et al. (2000) as interstitial and located on the short arm.
5
Aequidens plagiozonatus from the upper Paraguai showed diploid number of 2n=48,
a conserved character also reported for other species such as A. metae, A. portalegrensis, A.
pulcher, A. tetramerus, A. rivulatus (Marescalchi, 2005). Feldberg et al. (2003) suggest that
diploid number and the presence of a few metacentrics and submetacentrics are due to the
prevalence of pericentric inversions during chromosome evolution.
Both A. plagiozonatus cytotypes showed a single pair of NORs on a subtelocentric
chromosome pair, a chromosome location that is common in cichlids such as Geophagus
brasiliensis, Chaetobranchopsis australe e Cichlasoma facetum (Feldberg & Bertollo,
1985a). Brinn et al. (2004) indicate simple NORs in Cichla monoculus and in Cichla
temensis, although in these two species the NORs were located on telocentric chromosomes.
Fig. 1. a) Cytotype A of A. plagiozonatus; b) Cytotype B of A. plagiozonatus; c) Karyotype of C. lepidota. Insets show A. plagiozonatus and C. lepidota NOR´s. Bar = 5µm.
Fig. 2. C. lepidota (a) of A. plagiozonatus (b) metaphase chromosomes subject to DAPI. Arrows indicate AT- regions. Bar = 5µm.
a
b
6
In C. lepidota and A. plagiozonatus, C-banding also included regions near to NOR
sites. Loureiro et al. (2000) also report heterochromatic C+ regions in most chromosomes of
C. niederleinii and Crenicichla sp., and in the secondary constriction regions.
Heterochromatin was pericentromeric in most Oreochromis niloticus chromosomes
(Oliveira & Wright, 1998). Few cichlids have been studied with C-banding techniques;
however, all neotropical species studied (32) have heterochromatin blocks in the
chromosome pericentromeric regions, which were typically associated to NORs (Feldberg
et al., 2003). In C. lepidota and A. plagiozonatus, DAPI/CMA3 showed CG+ regions on the
first pair of metacentrics abutting the heterochromatic block and the NOR. These regions
are also DAPI-, as already reported by Loureiro et al. (2000) for populations of Crenicichla
in the Upper Paraná drainage. The same pattern of CMA+ was observed in Hoplias
malabaricus (Vicari et al., 2005).
Conclusions. Our results underline the fact that the fish populations of the Cerrado
hold high levels of genetic variation and that the Upper Paraguai basin is essential for a
more comprehensive understanding of the ichthyology of the Paraná and the Amazon
drainages.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Mato
Grosso and the Universidade Federal de Viçosa for financial support.
Literature Cited
BERTOLLO, L. A. C., TAKAHASHI, C.S. & MOREIRA-FILHO O. Cytotaxonomic considerations on Hoplias lacerdae (Pisces, Erythrinidae). Revista Brasileira De Genética, V.I, N.2, 103-120, 1978. BRINN, M. N. A, PORTO, J. I. R. & FELDBERG E. Karyological evidence for interspecific hybridization between Cichla monoculus and C. temensis (Perciformes, Cichlidae) in the Amazon. Hereditas 141 (3), 252-257, 2004.
7
BRUM, M.J. I. & GALETTI, JR P. M. Teleostei ground plan karyotype. Journal Of Comparative Biology, 2:91-102, 1997. DATA BASE FRESHWATER NEOTROPICAL FISHES. Disponível em: http://www.fishbase.org.search.cfm. Acesso em: janeiro de 2008. FELDBERG, E. & BERTOLLO, L. A. C. Karyotypes of 10 species of Neotropical cichlids (Pisces, Perciformes). Caryologia, 38: 257-268, 1985a. FELDBERG, E. & BERTOLLO, L. A. C. Nucleolar organizing regions in some species of Neotropical cichlid fish (Pisces, Perciformes). Caryologia, 38: 319-324, 1985b. FELDBERG, E, PORTO, J. I. R, & BERTOLLO, L. A. C. Chromosomal changes and adaptation of cichlid fishes during evolution. In: Val, A. L. & B.G. Kapoor. (Eds.). Fish Adaptation. New Dehli & New York: IBH & Oxford, 287-310, 2003. GROOM, M. & VYNNE C.H. Habitat degradation and loss. Pp. 174-212. In: GROOM, M.J. MEFFE, G.K & CARROLL, C.R. (EDS.). Principles of Conservation Biology. 3rd. ed. Sinauer Assoc. Sunderland, Massachusetts, 793p, 2006. HOWELL, W. M. & BLACK D. A. Controlled silver- staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: as 1-step method. Experimentia, 36: 1014-1015, 1980. KLINK, C. A. & MACHADO, R. B. A. Conservação do Cerrado brasileiro. Megadiversidade 1. Nº 1, 2005. KULLANDER, S. O. A phylogeny and classification of the South American Cichlidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). Pp. 461-498. In: Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Malabarba, L. R., Reis, R. E., Vari, R. P., Lucena, Z. M., Lucena, C. A. S. (Eds.). Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Edipucrs, 603p, 1998. KULLANDER, S. O. Family Cichlidae. Pp. 605-654. In: R.E. Reis, S.O. Kullander, & C. J. Ferraris (Eds.). Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South America and Central America. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 729p, 2003. LEVAN, A., FREDGA, K. & SANDBERG, A. A. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas, 52: 201-220, 1964.
8
MARESCALCHI, O. Karyotype mitochondrial 16S gene characterization in seven South American Cichlasomatini species (Perciformes, Cichlidae). Journal of zoological systematics evolutionary research, 43: 22-28, 2005. OLIVEIRA, C. & WRIGHT, J. M. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of heterochromatin in the chromosomes of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Teleostei: Cichlidae). chromosome research, 6: 205-211, 1998. SCHAEFER R. Conflict and Resolution: Impact of New Taxa on Phylogenetic studies of the Neotropical Cascudinhos (Siluroidei: Loricariidae). In: Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes. Malabarba, L. R., Reis, R. E., Vari, R. P., Lucena, Z. M., Lucena, C. A. S. (Eds.). Porto Alegre, RS, BRASIL. Edipucrs, 603p, 1998. SCHWEIZER, D. Simultaneous Fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterochromatic regions (DA-DAPI bands) in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 27: 190-193, 1980. VICARI, M. R, ARTONI, R.F. & BERTOLLO, L. A. C. Comparative cytogenetics of Hoplias malabaricus (Pisces, Erythrinidae): A population analysis in adjacent hydrographic basins. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 28: 103-110, 2005.