Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CROSS-BORDER FINANCE Controlled Foreign Corporations
October 20, 2017
Gabriel Yomi Dabiri Morrison & Foerster LLP
CONTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
The Deemed Dividend Dilemma
October 20, 2017
1. Discuss the recent case of Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., 130 A.D.3d 415 (2015)
2. Recognize how to identify a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC)
3. Understand how transactions involving CFCs are impacted by Section 956 of the Internal Revenue Code
4. Consider suggestions for dealing with deemed dividends in finance documentation when CFCs are involved
5. Examine recent developments as they pertain to Section 956 of the Internal Revenue Code
Learning Objectives
Morrison & Foerster LLP 2
3
This presentation was created by finance attorneys for finance attorneys and for those who are new to or unfamiliar with this subject matter An in-depth exposition of tax law is beyond the scope of this presentation and will not be covered today Because of the generality of this presentation, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations
Scope of Presentation – Health Warning
Morrison & Foerster LLP
4
The modern economy has been defined by globalization
This has given rise to opportunities to do business in foreign jurisdictions
As a result, many US corporations have expanded their global footprint
In 2012, earnings from US-controlled foreign corporations exceeded $793 billion
Introduction
Morrison & Foerster LLP
5
The US has no taxing authority over earnings from foreign corporations that have no connection to the US
US-controlled foreign corporations may be subject to several different forms of US tax, some substantial
Significant consequences may result if finance documentation does not adequately account for CFCs
Cautionary tale of recently settled case involving Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.
Introduction
Morrison & Foerster LLP
The Overseas Shipholding Group Case
Morrison & Foerster LLP
7
Lawyers revised credit agreement to impose “joint and several” liability rather than “several” liability Advised OSG to make a "check-the-box" election, which enlarged the prospective pool of taxable income Election could not be changed for five years
Case Study: Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., 130 A.D.3d 415 (2015)
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFC→ Section 956→ Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
8
Case Study: Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., 130 A.D.3d 415 (2015)
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFC→ Section 956→ Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
The company argued that revision resulted in unexpected and avoidable tax liability in the amount of $463 million In 2013, company sued its former attorneys for legal malpractice The case recently settled
9
When a US corporation borrows under a credit agreement, under what circumstances will the
income of its foreign subsidiary be subject to US tax liability?
Answer: When that foreign subsidiary is a
considered by applicable tax law to be a CFC that has made a deemed dividend to its US parent.
Question Raised in OSG Case
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFC→ Section 956→ Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
Identifying a Controlled Foreign Corporation
Morrison & Foerster LLP
11
What is a Controlled Foreign Corporation?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock is owned by
one or more US Shareholders on any given
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OR More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders on any
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
A CFC is a foreign corporation in which at least one US person owns 10% or more of the voting shares of the corporation
AND
12
What is a Controlled Foreign Corporation?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders on any
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
Let’s unpack this definition
13
What is a Controlled Foreign Corporation?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders on any
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
A CFC is a foreign corporation
14
The foreign entity must be a corporation for US tax purposes Certain foreign entities are always ("per se") corporations Other foreign entities are eligible ("foreign eligible entities") to be treated as corporations or not as corporations – seek tax advice
Identifying a CFC – Must be a Corporation
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
15
Corporations organized in US commonwealths, territories and possessions are generally considered to be foreign corporations and may be treated as a CFC
Identifying a CFC – Must be a Corporation
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
16
Controlled Foreign Corporations
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders on any
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
A CFC is a foreign corporation that has at least one US person
17
Section 7701 of the IRS Code defines a US Person as:
(A) a citizen or resident of the United States
(B) a domestic partnership
(C) a domestic corporation
(D) any estate other than a foreign estate
* A “foreign estate” is an estate the income of which comes from sources outside the US, and is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the US
Who is a US Person?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
18
Section 7701 of the IRS Code defines a US Person as:
(E) any trust if:
(i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and
(ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust
Who is a US Person?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
19
Controlled Foreign Corporations
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock is owned by
one or more US Shareholders on any given
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders on any
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
A CFC is a foreign corporation in which at least one US person owns voting shares
20
Documents to request and review in order to determine ownership of foreign corporation:
Foreign entity’s stock certificates: who has ownership/control; percentage ownership
Foreign entity’s articles of incorporation: type of entity and type of shares issued
Organizational chart: for direct/indirect ownership
CFC Ownership – Documents to Request
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
21
Direct, indirect, and constructive ownership are used to determine whether a US person is a US Shareholder with respect to a foreign corporation Only direct and indirect ownership are used to determine the percentage of stock owned by a US Shareholder
CFC Ownership – Types of Ownership
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
22
Stock owned directly by a US person determined by
reviewing the foreign entity’s stock certificates
CFC Ownership – Direct
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
23
Stock in a foreign corporation owned directly by a foreign entity
is considered to be owned indirectly by the shareholders,
partners or beneficiaries of that foreign entity
CFC Ownership – Indirect
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
24
Indirect ownership of shares of a foreign entity by partners, shareholders or beneficiaries is deemed to be in proportion to their ownership in the foreign entity For indirect ownership, only stock held by a foreign entity is considered, not stock owned by a domestic entity
CFC Ownership – Indirect
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
25
Constructive ownership means the effective ownership of stock actually owned by related persons (including entities)
Stock owned directly or indirectly by the taxpayer’s spouse, children, grandchildren or parents is considered in constructive ownership
Constructive ownership rules are not considered in determining the exact proportion of a US Shareholder’s inclusion
CFC Ownership – Constructive
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
26
A corporation, partnership, trust or estate that constructively owns
more than 50% of the voting stock of a corporation is deemed to own 100% of the voting stock
of that corporation
CFC Ownership – Constructive
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
27
Consider other ways the US person may have ownership in a foreign entity • Nominee ownership: stock held for US person • Signature authority: US person has effective
control • Voting agreement: US person has ability to select
over 50% of board
CFC Ownership – Other Forms of Ownership
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
28
Controlled Foreign Corporations
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock is owned by
one or more
US Shareholders on any given day during the
foreign corporation’s taxable year
OR
More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders
on any day during the foreign corporation’s
taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
A CFC is a foreign corporation in which at least one US person owns 10% or more of the voting shares of the corporation
AND
29
A US Shareholder is defined as a US person who owns, or is considered as owning, 10% or more
of the total combined voting power of all classes of the foreign corporation’s voting shares
Section 951(b), IRS Code
Who is a US Shareholder?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
30
A US Shareholder is subject to CFC analysis only if:
The foreign corporation was a CFC for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during the taxable year
AND
The US Shareholder owned stock in the foreign corporation on the last day of such taxable year
Who is a US Shareholder?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
31
Controlled Foreign Corporations
Morrison & Foerster LLP
More than 50% of the combined voting power
of all classes of stock is owned by one or more US Shareholders on any given
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OR More than 50% of the total value of the stock is owned by US Shareholders on any
day during the foreign corporation’s taxable year
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
A CFC is a foreign corporation in which at least one US person owns 10% or more of the voting shares of the corporation
AND
32
Items to consider when determining the substantive voting control of US Shareholders are the powers to:
elect, appoint or replace a majority of the board of directors (or corresponding governing group under local law) elect exactly half of the members of the board of directors and break a deadlock or exercise managerial powers during a deadlock elect the person who exercises the powers ordinarily exercised by the board of directors
Identifying a CFC – Voting Power
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
33
CFC Holding Companies
Morrison & Foerster LLP
NTD Any domestic subsidiary that
holds, directly or indirectly, no material assets other than the
equity interests (or equity interests and debt) of
subsidiaries that are CFCs
34
CFC Checklist
Determine if the entity is a foreign corporation
Determine if the potential ownership of that foreign corporation’s shares is by at least one US person
Determine if the potential ownership of shares by one or more US persons actually constitutes ownership (direct, indirect or constructive)
Identifying a CFC - Checklist
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
35
CFC Checklist
Determine if any US Shareholders potentially exercise any voting power or own any shares in connection with the foreign corporation
If the voting power test appears to be applicable, determine whether the US Shareholder exercises over 50% of the combined voting power of all classes of the foreign company’s stock
Remember to consider domestic subsidiaries that could be CFC holding companies. These may also trigger tax implications
Identifying a CFC – Checklist
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
36
CFC test is applied annually – the foreign company’s taxable year
Foreign corporation may be a CFC in one year, but not in another
Identifying a CFC – Annual Test
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
Impact of Section 956 on CFCs
Morrison & Foerster LLP
38
Prior to 1962, a CFC’s earnings were only subject to US taxation when repatriated as dividends to its US parent
Recognition that US corporations were obtaining an economic benefit from their foreign subsidiaries’ earnings
These benefits took various forms, such as investments, loans and guarantees provided by those foreign subsidiaries
Argument made that these benefits, in substance, were no different from the receipt of a dividend, and should be taxed
The World Before Section 956
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
39
Section 956 of the Internal Revenue Code was enacted in 1962 to prevent a US parent company from avoiding tax liability while implicitly receiving the benefit of the
income of their foreign subsidiaries
Section 956 of the Internal Revenue Code
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
40
Deemed Dividend: Two-Thirds Pledge
Morrison & Foerster LLP
1. US parent pledges two-thirds or more of the voting
power of its CFC as security
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
41
Deemed Dividend: Upstream Guarantee
Morrison & Foerster LLP
2. CFC provides upstream guarantee of its US parent’s
obligations
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
42
Deemed Dividend: Grant of Assets as Security
Morrison & Foerster LLP
3. CFC grants or pledges its assets to secure the
obligations of its US parent
43
Consequences of Triggering Section 956
Morrison & Foerster LLP
The current federal income tax rate for
corporations (not including any applicable state taxes) is 35%
The consequences for not adequately drafting loan documentation for US
corporations to account for the income of its CFCs can be significant
Navigating the Deemed Divided Dilemma
Morrison & Foerster LLP
45
Navigating the Deemed Dividend Dilemma: Is Section 956 Applicable?
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Determine if Section 956 is
Applicable
If no foreign subsidiary making a guarantee or pledge (of shares or
assets) is a CFC, then the guarantee or pledge will not be deemed a
dividend and the US parent will not be subject to additional tax liability
under Section 956
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
46
Navigating the Deemed Dividend Dilemma: Assess the Potential Tax Liability
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Determine if triggering Section
956 will give rise to significant tax
liability
Liability under Section 956 generally arises only to the extent the foreign
subsidiary has current or accumulated earnings that have not already been
subject to US taxation
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
47
Navigating the Deemed Dividend Dilemma: Limit Pledge of Voting Shares to 65%
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Limit the Credit Support of Foreign Subs to 65% of Such
Entity’s Stock
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
To avoid triggering Section 956, 65% pledge of foreign subsidiary capital
stock has become the market approach
This diminishes collateral value for lenders by placing them behind trade
and other creditors of the subsidiaries. Alternatives are pursued in instances where the foreign subsidiary is looked to as a primary source of repayment
48
Navigating the Deemed Dividend Dilemma: Consider Separate Loans
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Consider Separate Loans
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
Request loans to the US parent in US dollars and separate loans to each CFC
in its applicable foreign currency
The separate loans to the CFCs will each be guaranteed by the US parent
49
Navigating the Deemed Dividend Dilemma: Consider Issuing Non-Voting Shares
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Consider Issuing Non-Voting Shares
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
Section 956 is triggered for pledges of more than two thirds of voting shares
(not capital stock)
Pledging more non-voting shares as collateral provides the lender greater
equity value and helps avoid triggering Section 956
Section 956: Recent Developments
Morrison & Foerster LLP
51
In 2016, The US Internal Revenue Service and Treasury issued final regulations (TD 9792) under Section 956 The final regulations provide that Section 956 anti-abuse rule may apply when a foreign corporation or partnership controlled by a CFC is funded by any means (not just by capital contributions or debt) The tax attributes (for example earnings and profits and foreign taxes) of the foreign corporation will be taken into account when determining the application of the anti-abuse rule. Implementation of these regulations will require tax advice.
Section 956: Recent Developments
Morrison & Foerster LLP
OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
52
Key Takeaways
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Section 956 of the IRS Code – Section 956 prevents US corporations from avoiding tax liability while implicitly receiving the benefit of the income of their foreign subsidiaries; specifically CFCs
Identifying a Controlled Foreign Corporation – To be a CFC, at least one US person must own 10% or more of the voting shares of the foreign corporation, and one or more US Shareholders must own more than 50% of the foreign corporation’s (a) voting power or (b) total value OSG Case → Identifying CFCs → Section 956 → Deemed Dividends → Recent Section 956 Developments
53
Navigating Deemed Dividends – Capping at 65% any pledge to a US parent of shares in a CFC, separating the US corporation’s loans from the loans to its CFCs and/or pledging to the lender non-voting shares as collateral are ways to avoid triggering Section 956
Impact of Section 956 on Controlled Foreign Corporations – Inadvertently triggering Section 956 can cost your client hundreds of millions of dollars and result in an actionable claim for legal malpractice
Seek Advice from Your Tax Specialists
Key Takeaways
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Questions? Thank you for listening.