16
Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems By Jeremy R. Smith University of North Dakota April 30, 2012

Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

  • Upload
    yates

  • View
    39

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. By Jeremy R. Smith. University of North Dakota April 30, 2012. CropCam. CropCam. Remote Sensing for Agriculture. Satellite Expensive Temporal Resolution 16 days Cloud Cover Delayed Data No Choice Resolutions File formats. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

By Jeremy R. Smith

University of North DakotaApril 30, 2012

Page 2: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

CropCam

Page 3: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

CropCam

CropCam Specifications

Length 4 feet

Wing Span 8 feet

Weight 6 pounds

Engine Axi Brushless

Duration 20-35 minutes

Batteries 4 L-Polymer

Surfaces Rudder, elevator and ailerons

Average Speed 60 km/h

Maximum Winds 30 km/h

Page 4: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Remote Sensing for Agriculture

Page 5: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Satellite

• Expensive• Temporal

Resolution16 days

• Cloud Cover• Delayed

Data• No Choice

› Resolutions

› File formats

UAS

• Power in farmer’s hands•Date•Height•Resolution•Location

• Near-real time data

• Data Center

Satellite vs. UAS for Agriculture

Page 6: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Satellite Data• Six images• June 2011 – Sept

2011• Only 1 suitable image• July 30, 2011AEROCam Data

• 3 dates requested• Two days• Only one at Flying-

S• 15 Aug 2011

CropCam Data• 6 flying days• Sept 10 – Sept

11• 400, 600, 800,

1,000ft AGL

Data Acquisition

Page 7: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

600 ft. AGL

Approx: 4 Acres

800 ft. AGL

Approx: 8 Acres

1,000 ft. AGL

Approx: 14 Acres

400 ft. AGL

Approx: 2.5

Acres

Lowest Altitude

• 400ft AGL• Quarter section• Cover pass

required• Weave pattern

required• 1,000ft AGL• Half section• No cover pass

required• Weave pattern not

required

Page 8: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

+ + + +

+ + + +

=

Image Mosaic

Page 9: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Quarter Section

Page 10: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Half Section

Page 11: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Spatial Resolution

Page 12: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Image Comparison• Landsat• 30m• 0.22 acres per

pixel• Acre = five pixels

• AEROCam• 1m• 0.00025 acres per

pixel• Acre = 4,000

pixels• CropCam• 20 cm• 0.0000099 acres• Acre = 101,010

pixels

Page 13: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Water Damage Comparison

• Landsat• Undistinguishable

• AEROCam• Water damage is

clearly visible• Spots of low

productivity• CropCam• Water damage is

clearly visible• Spots of low

productivity• Issue with machinery

Page 14: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Water Damage Comparison

Page 15: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

High Resolution

Page 16: Crop Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Questions?