Upload
scott-rush
View
21
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic. By David Kelsey. Categorical Logic. Categorical logic is based on the relations of exclusion and inclusion among classes. A class is a set of things Example: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Critical ThinkingLecture 8
An introduction to Categorical Logic
By David Kelsey
Categorical Logic
• Categorical logic is based on the relations of exclusion and inclusion among classes.
• A class is a set of things• Example:
• Categorical logic gives us a set of rules for making justified inferences about classes of things.
• Example:
Categorical claims
• Categorical claims: A claim is categorical if it is about classes of things.
• Philosophy 110 example:
Standard formcategorical claims
• A standard form categorical claim:– results from putting names or descriptions of classes in the blanks of any of
the following 4 sentence forms:– A: All ___ are ___.– E: No ___ are ___.– I: Some ___ are ___.– O: Some ___ are not ___.
• Terms go in the blanks above.– Terms can be either nouns or noun phrases.
Terms
• The subject term: the term that goes in the first blank of a standard form categorical claim.
• The predicate term: – The term that goes in the second blank.– The predicate of the claim.– It is predicated of the subject term,
– Examples
Affirmative andnegative claims
• Affirmative claims include one class or part of one class in another.– These include all A and I claims.
– Example:
• Negative claims exclude one class or part of one class from another.– These include all E and O claims.
– Example:
Translating a categorical claiminto standard form
• Turning a categorical claim into standard form: – we can take an ordinary categorical claim and turn it into one of standard form.
– figure out which type of claim it is, A E I or O, and then just substitute in the claim’s terms.
– Find the standard form claim it is logically equivalent to.
Translating A and E claims
• Translating A claims: Consider Every X is a Y
• Translating E claims: Consider Xs aren’t Ys
Translating into present tense
• All standard form categorical claims must be in the present tense.– Talking about the past: we can still use standard form claims to talk about the past.
– link the subject and predicate which are about the past with the present tense of the verb ‘to be’.
Translating Only
• Consider only Xs are Ys, (for some X and some Y).
– For example:
– Turning this into standard form:• 1.) Determine what its terms are.
• 2.) Determine the form of the claim, A E I or O.
Only Sophomores are eligible candidates
• Consider: Only sophomores are eligible candidates: – An A claim: a careful reading of the claim indicates it is an A claim but
which one:• All sophomores are eligible candidates.
• All eligible candidates are sophomores.
The Only
• Now consider the only Xs are Ys, (for some X and some Y).– For example,
• This is another A claim:– We are talking about one class of things being included in another.
• Which A claim is it?
Rules for Only &The Only
• The word ‘only’: – introduces the predicate term of an A claim.
– Only sophomores are eligible candidates:
• The phrase ‘the only’: – introduces the subject term of an A claim.
– The only people admitted are people that are over twenty-one:
Times
• Consider ‘I always get nervous when I take logic exams.’
• The clue: when
– The claim says:
Places
• Now consider ‘He makes trouble wherever he goes’.
• The clue: wherever
– The claim says:
Single Individuals
• Claims about a single individual person:– For example,
• The class of things identical to an individual:
Aristotle is a logician
• Consider ‘Aristotle is a logician’:– Logicians and Aristotle:
• This claim is about two classes:
• All claims about single individuals are either A or E claims.
• Individual places: What has just been said about individual persons can also be said about individual places.