Upload
haduong
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
20 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1952
Dr. Bellows:
Thank you. Do processed citrus juices and
frozen concentrates produced from parathion
sprayed fruit become contaminated with
parathion Dr. Beckenbach?
Dr. Beckenbach:
Well, a lot of very careful analytical work
has been done on that problem and it just
isn't any problem. There are a few cases
where bare traces of parathion were found in
such concentrated juices, but in most cases
there was no detectable amount at all in the
juices by the time they were processed.
Dr. Bellows:
What are the problems encountered by
vegetable farmers in the effective use of fungi
cides, Dr. Beckenbach?
Dr. Beckenbach:
Yesterday many of you attended the vege
table session where you saw the work that had
been done in developing equipment that could
put on fungicides and insecticides, but main
ly fungicides, where it needs to be put on.
On fighting the inroads of fungus diseases,
as you well know, you have to apply your
fungicides to all parts of the plant and as new
growth develops on the plant you have to
keep that growth protected. Of course, you
can do that with a hand sprayer on a small
scale. But the commercial grower of today
who grows crops in vast acreages has to have
the equipment to apply these products effici
ently, effectively and economically. And that
is a problem. As you saw yesterday, there
is still a great deal of work being done to de
velop equipment that can do that job.
Dr. Bellows:
Time is drawing close here so I believe
we'll make this the last question. Are there
any quick field testing methods available to
farmers to check the amount of spray residue
on their crops? Dr. Taylor?
Dr. Taylor:
I would have to say no, there is not. In
our inspection work and some few tests that
the field inspectors can make, those are large
ly qualitative tests rather than quantitative
tests. What the grower would want to know
is not whether there was a residue on his
crop or not, because he knows that. He put
it there. But he wants to know, he would
have to know — how much? — and that would
have to be done at the laboratory. I don't think
the grower will ever be able to make a quan
titative determination.
Dr. Bellows:
Well, ladies and gentlemen, we thank you
for your attention and I'll now turn the
meeting back to President Holland.
CORRECTION OF IRON CHLOROSIS IN CITRUS WITH
CHELATED IRON
CD. Leonard and Ivan Stewart
Florida Citrus Experiment Station
Lake Alfred
Iron chlorosis is a serious nutritional prob
lem in fruit trees and many other plants
throughout the world. It is considered to be
Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal
Series No. 122.
the most difficult of all known mineral de
ficiencies to correct. This deficiency is widely
distributed in the Central Florida citrus-grow
ing area on both acid soils and calcareous
soils. It is now the most extensive nutritional
deficiency in Florida citrus.
The use of a chelating agent to supply iron
to plants in the field is presented here as the
first really successful means of correcting iron
LEONARD AND STEWART: IRON CHLOROSIS 21
chlorosis. This represents a new approach to minor element fertilization problems. It shows promise as a method of supplying plants with readily available forms of nutrient elements
which up to now have been deficient or un
available in the soil under many field condi
tions.
Symptoms of Iron Chlorosis
The symptoms of iron chlorosis in citrus are
easily distinguished from those of other nu
trient deficiencies. The veins of the leaves
stand out prominently because they remain
dark green, whereas the interveinal areas range
from light green in mild chlorosis to yellow
or ivory color in severe deficiency (Fig. 1). In badly affected trees, there is heavy defoliation
resulting in dieback of many limbs. Bloom
and fruit set are relatively light, production
of fruit is often greatly reduced, and much of the fruit fails to color properly on chlorotic
trees. Severely affected trees eventually die,
but may be taken out before this stage is
reached, because of poor production.
Cause of Iron Chlorosis
The possible causes of iron chlorosis or
"lime-induced" chlorosis on calcareous soils have been discussed extensively in the litera
ture and they are still controversial (3, 5).
Generally it is associated with high lime and
alkaline soil reaction.
Iron chlorosis of citrus is most extensive
in Florida on acid soils, where most of the
citrus is grown. The total iron content of
these soils is low, ranging from 400 to 2000
pounds per acre. This would be sufficient
iron for citrus trees if it were in available
form. It has been shown (2, 4, 7) that ex
cesses of certain heavy metals, such as cop
per, manganese and zinc, will induce iron
chlorosis in many different kinds of plants,
including citrus. Excessive phosphate may,
under certain conditions, cause iron deficiency
in citrus and other plants (1, 2). The lib
eral use of copper, phosphate, and possibly of
manganese in citrus fertilizers for many years
appears to be related to the recent rapid in
crease of iron chlorosis in Florida.
Iron chlorosis of citrus is caused by a de
ficiency of available iron in the tree, even
though it may be induced by excesses of cer
tain heavy metals. It has been found to occur
more extensively in locations where the soil
pH is below 5.5. The regular application
of lime or dolomite to maintain the soil pH
at about 5.5 to 6.0 tends to prevent iron chlo rosis, probably by rendering the heavy metals less soluble in the soil. Liming has been found to be much more effective in prevent
ing iron chlorosis than in correcting this dis
order.
Experimental
It was reported in a previous publication (8) that iron chlorosis in citrus trees failed to re
spond to a large variety of treatments, includ ing heavy liming of acid soils, applications of up to 25 lbs. of ferrous sulfate per tree, use
of sulfur or aluminum sulfate with ferrous
sulfate, injection of solid ferric citrate into the
trunks of trees, ferrous sulfate foliage sprays,
and others. More recently soil applications of iron with sodium tripolyphosphate (Na5P3O10), tetrasodium pyrophosphate (NaJP2O7), and so
dium hexametaphosphate (NaJPaOas) have
failed after several months to correct iron
chlorosis in citrus on both acid soils and cal careous soils when applied in amounts as high
as 20 pounds per tree. These materials will
chelate iron, and are widely used in water
softening. They are different from the ortho-
phosphates, which occur in superphosphate fer
tilizers.
Certain chelating agents have long been
used in nutrient solutions for sand- and water-
culture work, including iron citrate and iron
tartrate, but these also proved unsuitable for
use in the soil. Evidently a different complex-
ing or chelating compound, which would hold
iron in the soil in a form available to the trees,
was needed. Salts of ethylenediamine tetra-
acetic acid (EDTA) proved suitable for this
purpose.
As reported previously (8), various amounts
of iron were chelated with EDTA and applied
in solution to acid soils around chlorotic cit-
trus trees. EDTA is a chelating compound
which is widely used in industry (6), but
this was the first time it had been applied
to plants growing in the field. Ten or more
grams of chelated iron per tree, applied to
the soil, brought about greening of chlorotic
trees within six weeks after application. The
treated trees presented a distinct contrast with
nearby untreated chlorotic trees, which re
mained yellow. New flushes of growth have
invariably followed applications of chelated
iron to soil around chlorotic trees.
22 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1952
Twenty grams of chelated iron per tree,
when applied to the soil as uniformly as possi
ble under chlorotic trees over the area of a
circle with radius of from 8 to 10 feet from
the trunk, consistently resulted in complete
greening of all the chlorotic leaves on the
tree. In many instances, 10 grams of che
lated iron per tree produced rapid greening
of chlorotic trees; in other cases, this amount
resulted in a slightly slower recovery frorr
chlorosis than the 20 gram application.
Dry iron EDTA chelates containing from 8
to 13% iron are now being manufactured com
mercially. These materials have been applied
to several thousand acres of citrus and these
groves are being observed.
Properties of Metal Chelates. When ferrous
sulfate is dissolved in water, the molecule
breaks down to form two ions, the ferrous ion
(divalent iron) with two positive charges,
and the sulfate ion with two negative charges.
Most organic compounds, however, ionize
very little or not at all in aqueous solution.
Since ions must be present in solution for
chemical reactions to take place, the removal
of ions from solution can be used to prevent
undesirable reactions from occurring in the
solution or in the soil. Certain organic com
pounds can react with metallic ions in such
a way as to form a new compound in which
the metal is held inside the organic compound by strong chemical bonds. The resulting
metal "chelate" compound dissociates or ion
izes very little, and the bound metal remains
as a part of the chemically inactive molecule.
EDTA is a strong chelating compound, and
when it reacts with ferric iron (the oxidized state of the element) the resulting iron chelate
is very stable under acid conditions. This
means that the chelate will dissociate or ionize
very little and therefore will release very few of the chemically-inactive chelated iron atoms
into solution in the form of chemically-active
ions. The chelated iron cannot, therefore,
react with phosphates or other materials in the
soil which would render it insoluble or other
wise unavailable to plants. The iron EDTA
chelate is very soluble in water.
The stability of the iron EDTA chelate is
measured and expressed numerically by its
"stability constant." Since ferric iron is tight
ly bound by EDTA, this chelate has the
very high stability constant of 1025 (10 raised
to the 25th power).
All of the EDTA chelates with other heavy
metals have much lower stability constants
than iron, (6) a few of them being: Copper, ]0i8.3. zinc, lOic.i; and manganese,
1013.4 These values show that the ferric
iron EDTA chelate is about 107 or 10 million
times more stable than the copper EDTA che
late, and a billion times more stable than the zinc EDTA chelate. On a practical basis,
this means that essentially all of the iron EDTA
chelate applied to the soil will remain in that form, since other metals in acid soils can not
displace iron from the chelate. In calcareous soils, hydroxyl ions compete strongly for the
iron in the iron EDTA chelate, resulting in
the precipitation of a considerable amount of the previously chelated iron as the very in
soluble ferric hydroxide. This limits the use fulness of iron EDTA chelates on calcareous soils.
It is not yet clear just how the iron enters the tree from the chelate. The iron may be slowly released from the chelate through an exchange reaction at the root surface as the solution bathes the roots, and then taken up by the roots before it is tied up in the soil in some unavailable form. The other possi
bility is that the entire iron chelate compound may be taken up by the roots. This problem is being studied with isotope procedures.
Iron Content of Citrus Leaves
Chlorotic citrus leaves, after being washed
with a detergent were found to contain from
20 to 55 ppm. total iron (oven-dry basis) the
lower values being for severely chlorotic (yel
low) leaves. Table 1 shows the mineral con tent of leaves from chlorotic grapefruit trees after receiving various amounts of chelated
iron applied to the soil. All trees except the
untreated ones became green. All treatments
increased total iron in the leaves, although this did not increase uniformly with amounts ap
plied above 20 grams of iron per tree. There
was no significant change in the leaf content
of N, P, K, Ca, or Mn.
High rates of application, up to 400 grams
of chelated iron per tree, have produced no
toxicity symptoms in citrus, and the iron con
tent of the leaves is generally no higher than
when 10 or 20 grams of chelated iron is ap plied per tree.
The effect of ferrous sulfate on the iron
content of chlorotic orange leaves is shown
in Table 2. The trees were severely chlorotic
LEONARD AND STEWART: IRON CHLOROSIS 23
(yellow) before treatment. In contrast to
the large amount of iron as ferrous sulfate
which was required to green-up the trees, as
little as 20 grams of iron in the iron EDTA
chelate produced greening of all leaves, in
cluding later flushes of growth.
This work has not been underway long
enough to know how long a single soil appli
cation of chelated iron will maintain a citrus
tree free of iron chlorosis. The first trees were
treated more than a year ago and are still com
pletely green and growing vigorously. The
effect of chelated iron treatments on fruit
quality is being studied on the current crop.
100 grams of chelated iron per tree, but
larger amounts up to 300 grams were re
quired in some cases. These amounts are
too large to be practical for grove use, be
cause of the cost of the chelate. A search
is now underway for chelating agents which
are more efficient suppliers of iron when used
on calcareous soils.
Chelated Iron Applied as a Foliage Spray
Iron EDTA foliage sprays have corrected
iron chlorosis in some trees growing on cal
careous soils, but have failed in other in-
Fig. 1. Varying degrees of iron chlorosis in orange leaves. The leaf in the upper left-hand cor ner came from a severely chlorotic tree after
Use of Chelated Iron on Calcareous Soils
In work done to date, iron EDTA chelates
have not proved satisfactory for correcting
lime-induced chlorosis on calcareous soils.
Greening of chlorotic trees on alkaline soils has
been accomplished with soil applications of
it was treated with 20 grams of chelated iron.
stances. Where sprays have been ef
fective, they caused the entire leaf to become
green rather than developing green spots such
as those produced by ferrous sulfate sprays.
Iron EDTA sprays tend to burn the fruit and
may burn the leaves sufficiently to cause some
24 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1952
leaf drop. Further studies will be required
to determine the advisability of using che-
lated iron sprays in groves.
Leaching of Chelated Iron
Iron EDTA chelate is very soluble in water.
Field trials have shown that it is rapidly
leached from the acid, sandy soils of Central
Florida. An application of 6.5 pounds of che
lated iron per acre (which is double the rate
used for citrus) was all removed from the sur
face foot of soil by leaching within one month
after application, by about two inches of rain.
This may reduce the value of soil applications
made during periods of heavy rains.
Summary
A chelate of iron with ethylenediamine tetra-
acetic acid (EDTA) is presented as the first
successful corrective for iron chlorosis in citrus
in the field. When applied to acid soils at
the rate of only 20 grams of iron per tree,
the leaves on chlorotic citrus trees became
green within six weeks. From 100 to 300
grams of iron in this chelate per tree was re
quired to correct chlorosis on calcareous soils.
Chlorotic trees which became green after
treatment with the iron EDTA chelate showed
a marked increase in total iron in the leaves,
as compared with chlorotic leaves from un
treated trees. There was no significant change
in the leaf content of nitrogen, phosphorus,
potassium, calcium, or manganese.
Table 1
Mineral Composition of Spring Pluah Leavoa from Moderately Chlorotic
Grapefruit Trees Treated with Varying Anounto of Iron Chelated with
EDTA Applied to Acid, Sandy Soil
Grams Chalated
Iron Applied
per Tree
None
12
15
20
30
40
60
120
N
%
3.11
3.U
3.OS
2.89
2.86
2.98
2.99
2.88
Comoe >8ition
P K
% %
.204
.200
.163
.185
.177
.204
.189
.167
3.29
2.98
3.38
2.98
3.06
2.71
3.33
2.75
of LeaTOB
Ca
%
1.88
1.88
2.06
1.83
1.75
1.96
1.71
1.71
Mn
ppm.
25
21
25
22
35
18
25
22
Fe
55«
60
80
HO
115
150
120
110
At this time, foliage sprays of iron EDTA
chelate do not look promising for chlorotic
citrus trees growing on calcareous soils, but
will require further study.
Iron chlorosis in citrus failed to respond to
many different treatments designed to increase
the uptake of iron by the trees, including
some treatments that have been successful
with other crops.
Total Iron Content of Severely Chlorotic Valencia Orange Leaves
as Affected by Applications of Chelated and Unchelated Iron on
Acid SoU.
Grams Iron
Applied
par Tree
None
None
9,000
33,000
20
Condition of Tree
Severely Chlorotic
Deep Green, Healthy
Most of Leaves Became
Severely Chlorotic
All Leaves Became Green
All Leaves Became Green
All Leaves Became Green
All Leaves Became Green
Material Applied
llone
Hone
100 lbs.FeSQ4.7H2O
. . «
200 lbs.FeS04 (Ann.)
1/3 lb. Fo-EDTA
Flush of
Growth
Spring
Summer
Spring
Summer
Spring
Summor
Spring
Summer
Spring
Summer
Iron in
Leaves
vm.*
25 30
62
124
43
24
82
51
100
95
*Moderately chlorotic leaves. All other trees, chlorotic at the
start of the exoerlatent, greened up after treatment.
•Oven-dry basis.
Polyphosphates, pyrophosphates, and hexa-
metaphosphates, which will chelate iron, have
up to now failed to correct the chlorosis.
Work is continuing in an effort to find more
satisfactory chelating agents for other nutrient
elements and for iron in calcareous soils.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Biddulph, O., and Woodbridge, C. G. The uptake of phosphorus by bean plants with particular ref erence to the effects of iron. Plant Physiol. 27:
431-444. 1952.
2. Chapman, H. D., Liebig, G. F., Jr., and Vanselow, A. P. Some nutritional relations as revealed by a study of mineral deficiency and excess symp
toms of citrus. Soil Sci. Amer. Soc. Proc. 4: 196-
200. 1939.
3. Chapman, H. D., Brown, S. M., and Rayner, D. S. Nutrient deficiencies of citrus—symptoms, cause
and control. Citrus Leaves 25 (3): 1-12. 1945.
4. Colehour, J. K. Unpublished data, Florida Citrus Experiment Station. 1948.
5. Guest, P. L., and Chapman, H. D. Investigations on the use of iron sprays, dusts, and soil appli cations to control iron chlorosis of citrus. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 54: 11-21. 1949.
6. Martell, A. E. and Calvin, M. Chemistry of the metal chelate compounds. Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
New York. 1952.
7. Reuther, Walter and Smith, Paul F. The effect of copper on growth of citrus seedlings and its
possible relation to acid-soil chlorosis in Florida citrus groves. Citrus Mag. 14 (11): 25-27. 1952.
8. Stewart, Ivan, and Leonard, C. D. Iron chlorosis —its possible causes and control. Citrus Mag. 14
(10) : 22-25. 1952.