18
CORPORATE BOND RATINGS AND AGENCIES Alexandra Leziy-Miller

Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

  • Upload
    chapa

  • View
    51

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies. Alexandra Leziy-Miller. Topics and Learning Objectives. Debt review Purpose of ratings and users Credit rating a gencies Ratings Rating methodology Rating process Controversies . Corporate Debt. Debt Why does a company take on debt ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

CORPORATE BOND RATINGS AND AGENCIESAlexandra Leziy-Miller

Page 2: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

2

Topics and Learning Objectives Debt review Purpose of ratings and users Credit rating agencies Ratings Rating methodology Rating process Controversies

Page 3: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

3

Corporate Debt Debt

Why does a company take on debt? To undertake projects Mergers and acquisitions Refinance existing debt

What is the big deal about debt? Risk

Borrower Lender

Page 4: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

4

Purpose of Ratings and Users

Lenders want to know investments are safe

Support judgment Convenience Larger pool of funds Determine the cost of borrowing

Users Investors, Issuers, Regulators

Question?

Page 5: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

5

Agencies & History The “Big Three”

Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 1860

Moody’s 1900

Fitch Ratings 1913

Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO)

1975

Page 6: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

6

Standard & Poor’s

1860

Henry Poor &

Railroads

1890

Oil & Steel

1897

Luther Blake

1941

Merger

1957

S&P 500

2011

GlobalMcGraw

Hill Compan

iesTimeline

Page 7: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

7

Moody’s

1900

John Moody & Industria

ls

1909

Railroads

1914

Moody’s Investor Services

, Inc.

1924Bonds

1970

“Issuer-pays”

2011

Global

Timeline

Page 8: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

8

Fitch Ratings

1913John Fitch

& Fitch Publishing

Co.

1924Rating Scale

1990s

M&A’sGROWTH

2000M&As

GROWTH

2011Fitch

RatingsFitch

SolutionsFitch

TrainingTimeline

Page 9: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

9

Long-Term RatingsLong-Term Ratings Moody’

s S&P

Fitch

INVESTMENT GRADEHighest quality Aaa AA

AAAA

High quality (very strong) Aa AA AAUpper medium grade (strong) A A AMedium grade Baa BB

BBBB

NON-INVESTMENT GRADE (Junk Bonds)Lower medium grade (somewhat speculative)

Ba BB BB

Low grade (speculative) B B BPoor quality (may default) Caa CC

CCCC

Most speculative Ca CC CCNo interest being paid or bankruptcy petition filed

C C C

In default C D D

Page 10: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

10

Short-Term Ratings

Short-Term Ratings

Moody’s S&P Fitch

INVESTMENT GRADEPrime/High

Grade P-1A-1+ F-1+

Upper Medium A-1 F1Low/Upper

MediumP-2 A-2 F2

Lower Medium P-3 A-3 F3NON-INVESTMENT GRADE

Speculative

NOT PRIME

B BExtremely

SpeculativeC C

In Default / /*Short-Term ratings are based on the probability of default within one year

Page 11: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

11

Main Rating Factors1. Protections afforded in the covenants 2. Collateral3. Ability to make payments

The lower your rating, the more covenants, collateral and requirements your bond issue will contain

To strengthen and reduce risk Credit enhancement

Bond insurance (limited availability) Letter of credit (commercial banks) Third party guarantee (cash, securities, assets)

Page 12: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

12

Credit Agency Methodology Quantitative and qualitative analyses

Event risk Natural disaster – e.g. Florida vs. Wyoming

Financial risk – Ability to make payments Company vs. company comparison Microeconomic event Ratios

Business risk Industry vs. industry comparison – e.g. oil vs. airline Economy - macroeconomic event

Corporate governance risk Ownership structure Management quality

Page 13: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

13

The Ratings Process1. Submit application (request rating)2. Lead analyst and team3. Review committee4. Inform issuer5. Appeal6. Public7. Monitor

Page 14: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

14

Monitoring Why is monitoring of ratings important?

Cost of borrowing Regulations Credit watch & outlook

(positive/stable/negative) Does not necessarily lead to a change Current Events: April 18, 2011

AAA Rating On United States of America ; Outlook Revised To Negative

Page 15: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

15

Controversies Conflict of interest

“Investor-pays” business model “Issuer-pays” business model

Ratings don’t change quickly enough Enron

Barriers to entry High

Page 16: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

16

Market Share

S&P; 40%

Moody's; 40%

Fitch; 15%Other; 5%

Market Share

S&PMoody'sFitchOther

Page 17: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

17

Questions? Thank you

Page 18: Corporate Bond Ratings and Agencies

18

References Standard and Poor’s

http://www.standardandpoors.com Moody’s

http://www.moodys.com Fitch:

http://www.fitchibca.com U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

http://www.sec.gov WIKIPEDIA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_rating_agency Fabozzi, Modigliani, Jones (2010). Foundations of Financial

Markets and Institutions, 4th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.