17
THE APDR/A³CR²/APCR CORE EXAM SURVEY Lori Deitte, Kristen DeStigter, Joseph Grajo, Darel Heitkamp, Lynn Lammers, Roocha Patel, Anup Shetty, Rajeev Suri, and Lance Warren Data do not represent the opinions or endorsements of APDR/A³CR²/APCR

CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

THE APDR/A³CR²/APCR CORE EXAM SURVEY

Lori Deitte, Kristen DeStigter, Joseph Grajo, Darel Heitkamp, Lynn Lammers, Roocha Patel, Anup Shetty, Rajeev Suri, and

Lance Warren

Data do not represent the opinions or endorsements of APDR/A³CR²/APCR

Page 2: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

CORE EXAM SURVEY

• Identify effective study tools, review methods and practices for preparing for the ABR Core Exam

•266 responses from 4th year residents

•24 questions

•Many free form responses

90.5%

0.8% 8.7%

Pass Condition Fail

Page 3: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

CASE CONFERENCES

12%

26%

43%

61%

63%

5%

0%

27%

18%

91%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Include Patient Safety

Include Clinical Physics

Audience Response

Modified w/ MCQs

Oral Boards Cases

Fail Pass

• 10-15 cases per conference felt to be ideal by both groups

• Comments vary between preference for “hot-seat” versus MCQs

Page 4: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

BOARD REVIEW

18%

61% 63%

18% 18%

77%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

None Modified w/

MCQs

Oral Boards

Cases

Internal Review

Pass Fail

• 16-25+ cases per hour session felt ideal by both groups

• Fewer guest lecturers than before

• Slightly smaller proportion that passed (46%) attended an external review course than those who failed (57%)

Page 5: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

PHYSICS CURRICULUM & REVIEW • External physics review:

• 60% who passed attended

• 70% who failed attended

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Focused

Board

Review

Annual

Curriculum

36 Month

Curriculum

Required

RSNA

Modules

No in-

house

physicist

Internal Physics Review

Pass Fail

Page 6: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

STUDY RESOURCES • 1 = least helpful, 5 = most helpful

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

ABR Blueprints

ABR Study Guide

AIRP iPad App

ABR Sample Content

ACR Case-In-Point

ACR Appropriateness…

ABR NIS Resource…

Journal Articles

ACR Contrast Manual

ABR Practice Questions

Internal Physics Review

Fail Pass

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

Daily Case Conferences

Daily Didactic…

External Board Review

Case Review Series

DVD Review Lectures

Rad Cases

RSNA Modules

Internal Board Review

RadPrimer

External Physics Review

Fail Pass

Page 7: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

MISCELLANEOUS

• Multidisciplinary conferences

• Most responded that they attended 1-4/month

• 30% of those who failed attended no conferences

• 16% of those who passed attended no conferences

• Noninterpretive skills (NIS) and patient safety

• Several respondents did not know ABR NIS resource guide existed

• ACR website, contrast manual, practice guidelines

• No great outside resources; mostly experiential and common sense

Page 8: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

FACTORS THAT WERE HELPFUL IN PREPARATION

• Practice MCQs, from RadPrimer, QEVLAR, Raphex

• Dedicated time to study

• Working hard, studying continuously, and being invested in learning the first three years of residency

• ABR Core Pilot exam for giving a sense of what to expect

• Other texts: Primer of Diagnostic Imaging, Aunt Minnie’s Atlas, Top 3 Differentials, Specialty Board Review Radiology

Page 9: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

FACTORS THAT CREATED DIFFICULTY

• Uncertainty as the first test-taking group, where to begin studying, scope of material

• ABR: Study Guide too broad; online questions too easy; Core Pilot misleading in terms of difficulty; misleading in describing a test of minimal competency that working hard and paying attention during residency would prepare

• Physics: Lack of good teaching during residency and resources to study for the exam

Page 10: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

FACTORS THAT CREATED DIFFICULTY • Programs: Faculty uncertainty regarding exam (treating it

similarly to prior Physics or Written exam); no adjustment in style of board review; friction regarding time off to study; lack of exposure to Cardiac imaging

• Residents: Balancing time needed to study with clinical responsibilities, call

• Noninterpretive Skills: Guide overly long, minutiae from references tested

• Safety: Infrequently or never discussed during residency

Page 11: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

R4 ADVICE FOR CORE EXAM

• Start physics early; read throughout residency; attend conferences; shadow techs; study Nuclear Medicine

• Practice MCQs; use case review type textbooks; complete the RSNA physics modules multiple times throughout residency

• Make a study plan and stick to it; save time at end; have an anchor resource that you annotate

• Limit your resources to high yield; review course(s)

Page 12: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

R4 ADVICE FOR CORE EXAM

• Discover your program’s (and your own) deficiencies early to identify what will require more self-study

• Try to build a solid foundation of physics (including nuclear medicine) prior to reviewing all the sections

• Read the noninterpretive skills guide, including the linked references

Page 13: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

R4 ADVICE FOR RESIDENCY • Study early (from day one) and often (every day, even if only

for 30 minutes)

• Study and work hard; see as many cases as you can; “own” each service; read RadioGraphics; teach junior residents

• Approach residency with a purpose • Form your own impressions before reading out • Ask for teaching, don’t just try to get the work done and let that be your

only role • Ask questions; don’t let others assume you know • Set goals for each rotation • Take evaluations of others seriously • Push for change when appropriate

Page 14: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

R4 ADVICE FOR RESIDENCY • “Read about cases as you see them. Talk to referring physicians

and learn what is important to them re: your interpretations. Try

to have fun.”

• Have both old oral style conferences and multiple choice

conferences throughout all 4 years, emphasizing case-taking

initially and MCQs later in residency

• Don’t make excuses. Residency is your chance to make

mistakes and learn from them

Page 15: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

ABR SCORE REPORT: COMMENTS • Compare scores with testing cohort, statistical analysis made

more transparent (standard deviation, quartiles, etc.)

• Score report for Core Pilot was more informative

• Unclear what constitutes a Fail vs Condition vs Pass; Vague; hard to determine specific areas of weakness

• Insufficient for residents who failed • How badly did they fail (how much do they need to improve)?

• Did they perform poorly on “easy” questions, “hard questions,” etc?

• Three months for an exam score report seems excessive

Page 16: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

OPPORTUNITIES • Physics: Integrate the RSNA Physics modules and

clinical physics into the curriculum

• Conferences and Review Sessions: Modify the format; integrate physics, non-interpretive skills when possible

• Residents: Make a study plan and start physics early

• Multidisciplinary conferences

• ABR: Study guide, NIS resource, Core Exam report

Page 17: CORE Exam Survey - Results Presentation

THANK YOU A special thanks to all fourth year radiology residents

who completed the workgroup Core Exam survey!