Upload
john-mcdonald
View
551
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given at the SCELC Executive Board Meeting, March 17, 2006
Citation preview
Consortia Level Collection Evaluation
John McDonaldSCELC Executive Board
MeetingMarch 17, 2006
Why Evaluate at the Consortia Level?Why Evaluate at the Consortia Level?
1. Evaluation is Necessary
Negotiation review
Cost/Benefit analysis
Quantitative data
2. Evaluation is Possible
Relativity
Comparability
Generalizibility
Why Evaluate Now?Why Evaluate Now?
History of SCELC Use
Most major products and vendors now licensed.
Most communities saturated or nearly so after multi-year access.
Data is available
Review of SCELC Use
Compare products and vendors.
Evaluate prices at a number of different layers.
Review of contracts that can help strategic planning.
Aspects of Collection EvaluationAspects of Collection Evaluation
1. Quality
Did the resource do what it purported to do?
Did it do that well?
2. Usage
Was it used?
How did the usage relate to other resources or schools?
3. Value
Did the usage justify the cost?
Did it meet other value criteria aside from usage & cost?
Quantitative Collection EvaluationQuantitative Collection Evaluation
1. Usage
Quantitative
Objective
Immutable
2. Value
Price
Benefit
Other Value Criteria
Current Collection Evaluation ProjectsCurrent Collection Evaluation Projects
1. Evaluation of Elsevier ScienceDirect
Consortium
2. Evaluation of Wiley InterScience
Consortium
3. Comparison of Society & Commercial Publishers CaltechClaremont
Elsevier ScienceDirect AnalysisElsevier ScienceDirect Analysis
Who: Subject Collection Analysis for 11 schools
What: Access included subscribed title list (full print price + 10-12% e-access fee) & leased titles (2-7% subject collection fees)
When: SCELC 2003 Usage
How: Total Fulltext & 2003 Prices by institution
Why: Evaluate SC or Unique Title List options for individual subscriptions
Elsevier ScienceDirect AnalysisElsevier ScienceDirect Analysis
Row Meta-statistics Number Price
1 Subscribed Titles with Zero Use 98 $52,710
2 Subscribed Titles with <5 use 161 $109,543
3 Unique Titles 522 $1,085,530
4 Total Copies 748 $1,298,170
5 % of Use from Top Title 2% $1,052
6 % of Use from Top 10 Titles 16% $63,645
7 % of Use from Top 20% of Titles 68% $883,698
8 % of Copies in Top 20% of Titles 37% $883,698
9 % of Dollars in Top 20% of Titles 58% $883,698
10 Price of 2004 Content $1,178,289
11 Price of 2004 E+SC $269,054
12 Total Price of 2004 Elsevier $1,447,943
SCELC Use by Journal (Top 10 Used)SCELC Use by Journal (Top 10 Used)
Title CopiesTotal Use
SCELC Payment
Price / Use
Lancet 3 3103 $2,449.71 $0.79
Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4 1828 $5,094.79 $2.79
Obstetrics & Gynecology 0 1707 $0.00 -
American Journal of Medicine 3 1527 $1,167.53 $ 0.76
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 1 1437 $4,316.26 $3.00
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 3 1297 $1,454.07 $1.12
Journal of Controlled Release 1 1278 $3,285.83 $2.57
American Journal of Cardiology 3 1221 $1,320.84 $1.08
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1 1197 $7,774.64 $6.50
American Journal of Gastroenterology 0 1145 $0.00 -
Totals 775 120,199 $1,307,898 $10.88
SCELC Use by Elsevier SubscriptionSCELC Use by Elsevier Subscription
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Subscribed Usage per Journal
Unsubscribed Usage per Journal
SCELC Price per Elsevier UseSCELC Price per Elsevier Use
$0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
$400.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Subscribed Price per Use
Unsubscribed Price per Use
Wiley InterScience AnalysisWiley InterScience Analysis
Who: Usage Analysis for 23 contract participants
What: Access included subscribed title list (full print price + 6% annual inflation + 3% e-access fee) & shared titles list.
When: SCELC 2004 Usage
How: Total Fulltext & 2004 Prices by institution
Why: Review of previous contract in anticipation for 2006 renewal
Wiley InterScience AnalysisWiley InterScience Analysis
Row Meta-statistics Number Price
1 Subscribed Titles with Zero Use 56 $36,546
2 Subscribed Titles with <5 use 117 $162,056
3 Unique Titles 229 $455,756
4 Total Copies 675 $1,296,813
5 % of Use from Top Title 14% $49,202
6 % of Use from Top 10 Titles 35% $235,533
7 % of Use from Top 20% of Titles 68% $648,546
8 % of Copies in Top 20% of Titles 32% $648,546
9 % of Dollars in Top 20% of Titles 50% $648,546
10 Price of 2004 Content Fee $1,253,891
11 Price of 2004 E-Access Fee $37,617
12 Total Price of 2004 EAL Fee $1,291,507
SCELC Use by Journal (Top 10 Used)SCELC Use by Journal (Top 10 Used)
Title CopiesTotal Use
SCELC Payment
Price / Use
Angewandte Chemie 11 19549 $49,202 $2.52
Journal of Comparative Neurology 4 5220 $70,885 $13.58
Cancer 9 4130 $4,518 $1.09
International Journal of Cancer 7 3869 $18,993 $4.91
Chemistry - A European Journal 4 3286 $14,035 $4.27
Hepatology 5 3218 $6,037 $1.88
BioEssays 9 2502 $8,950 $3.58
Journal of Neuroscience Research 5 2435 $40,354 $16.57
Developmental Dynamics 3 2259 $11,412 $5.05
International Journal of Eating Disorders 7 2225 $11,148 $5.01
Totals 675 137701 $1,296,813 $9.42
SCELC Use by Wiley SubscriptionSCELC Use by Wiley Subscription
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Subscribed Use per Journal
Unsubscribed Use per Journal
SCELC Price per Wiley UseSCELC Price per Wiley Use
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
$350.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Subscribed Price per Use
Unsubscribed Price per Use
SCELC Wiley Use vs. Elsevier UseSCELC Wiley Use vs. Elsevier Use
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Wiley SU
Wiley UU
Elsevier SU
Elsevier UU
Comparison of Society to CommercialComparison of Society to Commercial
1. Why not to Compare
Societies don’t usually package content
Societies don’t usually make consortia deals
But..if they do, there is one price, rather than surcharges, content fees, and access fees.
2. How to Compare
Overall price per use metrics
Overall rate of usage relative to other titles
SCELC Price per Use ComparisonSCELC Price per Use Comparison
$0.53
$8.34
$9.38
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
$10.00
Society (2 Schools) Elsevier Consortium (11Schools)
Wiley Consortium (23Schools)
Usage Based Pricing ModelsUsage Based Pricing Models
1. Usage
Economic incentive for publisher to improve access, quality, retrieval
Spread costs across members of consortia equitably
2. Tiered Usage
Encourages publishers to increase access and quality
Divorces e-access pricing from print legacy pricing
Corrects baseline of historical inflationary pricing
Corrects for payment disparities b/t Society & Commercial
Provides for library budgeting stability
Limits need to mediate end user usage
Minimum Spend = 50% of Prior Spend
Usage Based Spend = $5 PPU
Maximum Spend = 125% of Prior Spend
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Usage Based Pricing Advantage
Usage Based Pricing Example (Tiered)Usage Based Pricing Example (Tiered)
Why Evaluate Now?Why Evaluate Now?
Review of current & prospective contracts
Continuing price escalation not sustainable
Evaluate prices to consortia and members
Review contracts with additional criteria
Promote models for quality not just quantity
Plan for future
We may never know why faculty do what they do . . .
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?"
Albert Einstein