Upload
felicity-goodman
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
PRO SUCCESS TOOLS The fact-feeling dialectic Converting hot conflict to cold Thesis-antithesis- synthesis change Fact-feeling dialectic
CONFLICT MGT
EMPOWERING YOUR PROFESSIONAL LIFE
• Turning conflict into progress
• Avoiding negative conflict
• Neutralizing negative conflict
PRO SUCCESS TOOLS• The fact-feeling
dialectic• Converting hot
conflict to cold • Thesis-antithesis-
synthesis change• Fact-feeling dialectic
Conflict: comes from human selfishness & requires
unselfish human solutions
CONFLICT ARE U.S.1. Corporate downsizing, temp
employee, & outsourcing practices
2. BU vs. the independent alumni association
3. Revolt of the 5 “power” conferences against the NCAA
4. Twitter fights5. Lawyers in suits
HOT vs. COOL CONFLICT
COOLcon = INTELLECTUAL point of view: info-facts, thoughts, reasoning, friendly debate, the future
HOTcon = personalities, emotions, agendas, feuds, grudges, insults, the past
COOL POTENTIAL CONFLICT• New policy that employees
have to pay $50 monthly to continue parking in the company’s parking tower.
• Revising the Human Resources performance evaluation review process & rating form
• Explaining a disputed bill to a complaining customer
HOT POTENTIAL CONFLICT• Two dept. managers compete
to hire the same employee• A political candidate runs a
personal smear campaign against his opponent for office
• A project manager in a large govt. contracting firm appoints his friends for the highest level jobs
GENDER BENDER• In general, males seek to resolve conflict via competition: win vs. lose•Females prefer cooperation: win-win
The toughest challenge of conflict management is accurately defining the type of conflict at hand—a non-exact requiring 360 feedback from others.
The #1 goal of conflict containment is to convert hot
conflict into cool.
• Focus feuding employees on tomorrow instead of the past & on the mission > personal agendas
• Get more feedback than usual from employees in an on-going change-zone of an org
• Stay alert for potential interpersonal conflicts generated by unpopular or controversial employees: aggressive career-builders; office “politicians”; “alpha-dog” supervisors, etc.
Conflict strategy must be based on unique
situational circumstances:
Reading & implementing conflict causes & remedies is a judgment call proposition. No guarantees. Preventing fires is easier than putting them out.
CONFLICT JUDGMENT-CALLS• Was unusually low employee
participation in the company United Way campaign program a sign of low morale?
• When you hear that one of your best employees is looking for another job, does that mean they are unhappy with their current job, or with you as their boss?
• Should you follow-up on gossip that your boss is displeased with your work?
GENERIC CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES (AACCC)
1. Accommodating →2. Avoiding →3. Collaborating →4. Competing →5. Compromising →
1. Use when you can’t win2. Use to buy time to fight
another day3. Use when neither party can
win without cooperation4. Use when unpopular action
(win-lose) is the only alternative
5. Use when each side has equal power
Can’t win: ACCOMODATION
•Taming NFL football•Augusta (Masters Tournament) country club admission of women members
Create time to power up: AVOIDANCE
•U.S. involvement in Middle East religious conflicts•US Postal Service & Social Security huge operations deficits
Can’t win without cooperating: COLLABORATION
•Mandatory immunizations for measles control vs. citizen rights•Bill collection agencies negotiating with debtors
Win-lose conflict: COMPETITION
•Cars & feed lots vs. global warming•National Rifle Association/open carry vs. gun control
Equal power on each side: COMPROMISE
• Big 12 schools feud over whether or not to create an end-of-season football championship to stay on par with the other “power-5” conferences• Marijuana producers & federal
regulators engage in give & take on approaches for legalizing the drug.
The TAS technique of innovative conflict
resolution is…
… achieving cooperation by synthesizing the win-lose dichotomy of thesis (one point of view) & antithesis (a second, conflicting, POV) into a win-win synthesis of a creative & agreeable third position.
Thesis: Employee pay raise (stable paycheck mindset)Antithesis: Pay cut (stable paycheck mindset)Synthesis: Commission or bonus pay (variable paycheck mindset)Thesis: 8:00 a.m. classAntithesis: Evening classSynthesis: Online class
Thesis: Construct a new office buildingAntithesis: Stay in the old buildingSynthesis 1: Renovate the old buildingSynthesis 2: Keep the old building as unit A and buy/renovate adjacent building as complementary unit B
Thesis: Status quo (no operating changes) for the NCAAAntithesis: Reform the NCAASynthesis 1: Let the 5 “power conferences” regulate themselvesSynthesis 2: Make college football, basketball, & baseball “minor league” pro teams
The FACT-FEELING DIALECTIC of psychological
conflict resolution
Conflict issues won’t be resolved if they short-
circuit full human wiring (intellect + emotions)
Matadors use the cape to protect themselves from the bull, who thinks the
cape is part of the matador.
The F-F dialectic is a simple strategy for neutralizing (a la the matador’s cape) or “killing” interpersonal conflict (the bull) through facilitating a dialogue that alternates between sharing facts (cool conflict objective information) and feelings (hot conflict subjective emotions).factsFEELINGSfactsFEELINGS
Entrees & Primers• What do you know
about…” (fact)• “How does that make you
feel?” (feeling)• “What do you think we
should do?” (fact)• “What’s your take on what
Steve just said?” (feeling)
THE CONFLICT MANAGER• Help employees realize that
feelings usually change over time.
• Delay decision-making until emotions have settled down.
• Strive to generate good feelings about HOW decisions are made (anticipatively).