Upload
louis-segal
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Comparing the Ways in Which Attitudes Towards War Are Presented in Who's for the Game and Anthem for Doom
1/2
Louis Segal 9.5 Monday 17th
March 2014
9x2 English
pg. 1
Comparing the ways in which attitudes towards war are
presented in Whos for the Game? andAnthem for Doomed
Youth
During World War 1, many poems were written as propaganda to advertise the war and to
encourage young men to sign up. One example of this is Whos for the Game?by Jessie Pope,
written in 1916. However, after World War 1, poems were written that contradicted the earlier
poems by saying how horrible war was and that it was not patriotic or jolly, as they were against
the idea of glorifying war. Wilfred Owen wrote two poems towards the end of World War One,
Dulce et Decorum Est andAnthem for Doomed Youth.
The titles of the poems give clear ideas of the attitude towards war that the reader wishes to
portray. The title of Jessie Pope s poem (Whos for the Game?) suggests that war is a game; fun,
exciting and patriotic. It was to encourage men that they should sign up for what would be
something lively and enjoyable. Its a rhetorical question and because at the time war was
something to be proud of, youd straight away want to sign up because you would not say no to
that question. Game is a metaphor. Anybody can tell that war is not a game because now we
know that it is destructive and cruel. She used this device to distract the reader from what they
may already know, or to manipulate their view of that. Wilfred Owen however names his poem
Anthem for Doomed Youth. In that title there is no attempt to give the impression that war is a
good thing. It straight away talks about the Doomed Youth and how it is certain they are going to
either be heavily injured, or die. However, a metaphor is used on the first word: Anthem. An
anthem is a song of celebration; something patriotic, cheerful and uplifting. He was being sarcasticbecause he does not want to chant joyfully about the dead.
"Who's for the game?"was written at the beginning of the war and consequently was written in
Georgian style, as was a lot of the poetry of that era. The poem has four, four-line stanzas with a,b
rhyming scheme. This 'sing-song' approach ties in with the ideas the poem holds, about war being a
game and a show. These similes were often used in wartime propaganda as another way of
encouraging men to sign up.
Anthem for Doomed Youth was written towards the end of the war. It starts off at a quick pace
and then continues to decelerate throughout the poem, drawing to a slow, solemn and sombre
close. Throughout this poem the traditional feel of an elaborate ceremonial of a Victorian style
funeral is constantly compared and contrasted to the ways in which men died in the war. The tone,
which pervades the poem, is of sadness and sorrow, written in the third person and addressed to
the families, friends and comrades of the First World War.
Anthem for Doomed Youth was written towards the end of the war. It incorporates the theme of
the horror of the war. It was written as a sonnet. It has 2 verses; the first having an a,b,a,b etc.
rhyming scheme, and the second an a,b,b,a,c,c rhyming scheme. Comparing WftG and AfDYs
structure, they are both set out differently. Popes poem has only one verse but Owens has two.
8/12/2019 Comparing the Ways in Which Attitudes Towards War Are Presented in Who's for the Game and Anthem for Doom
2/2
Louis Segal 9.5 Monday 17th
March 2014
9x2 English
pg. 2
Jessie Pope often uses the word You (or variations). She attempts to put forward that it is your
duty to sign up to the war. This is in an attempt to get you to sign up to the war; its almost asubliminal type of advertising. You sign up because someone has told you that you feel you should.
Wilfred Owen however makes no attempt to encourage you to sign up to any war because it is not
patriotic, it is destructive.
Jessie Pope lies all the way through her poem. The Whos for the Game metaphor makes it sound
like it is glorious and fun. She often uses words which while technically being metaphors, are
actually just lies. If something is appealing to you then you will want to sign up to it, and Pope just
advertises war by lying through her teeth. Owen however does none of this. He is straight with you
and makes no attempt to hide any of the devastations of war. He is first to say that war is
destructive and cruel. He is not advertising war, but doing the opposite. He tries to show peoplethe realities of it in an attempt to change their views on it.
In conclusion, I feel that both poems are effective, but they both present very different pictures of
war. Owen's poems are excellent examples of poetry portraying the realism of war, whereas Pope's
poem is an excellent example of the unfortunate attitude cultivated on the home front. The
contrast between the two allows the reader to see the reality of the First World War from two
immensely different perspectives.