COMMUNICATION 40 -FINAL-.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 COMMUNICATION 40 -FINAL-PDF FILE.pdf

    1/4

    REPUBLIC OF KENYA

    FIRST ASSEMBLY

    (SECOND SESSION)

    THE KIAMBU COUNTY ASSEMBLY

    COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CHAIR

    NO.40 OF 2014

    COMMUNICATION CONCERNING THE MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF THE

    KIAMBU COUNTY GOVERNOR BY IMPEACHMENT

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Honorable Members,

    In accordance with Standing Order 60(2) of the Interim Standing Orders, I wish to inform

    this Honorable Assembly that on Monday 1st December, 2014 my Office did receive a

    motion for removal of the Governor by impeachment accompanied by a form duly signed

    by thirty members of the Kiambu County Assembly in support of the motion from theHonorable Joseph Murugami, MCA.

    Honorable Members,

    As contemplated in Article 181 (a), (b) or (c) of the Constitution of Kenya and in accordance

    with Section 33(1) of the County Government Act the motion stated that the Kimabu

    County Governor H.E William Kabogo has grossly violated the Constitution and other

    laws as well as shown gross misconduct or abuse of office in performing the functions

    of office of the County Governor.

    Honorable Members,

    In view of the foregoing matter and for the avoidance of doubt, I wish to quickly draw the

    attention of the members to provision of standing orders 60 of Interim Assembly Orders

    governing the procedure for removal of the Governor by impeachment, and I quote;

  • 8/10/2019 COMMUNICATION 40 -FINAL-PDF FILE.pdf

    2/4

    (1)Before giving the notice of motion under Section 33 of the County

    Governments Act, 2012, the Member shall deliver to the Clerk a copy of

    the proposed motion in writing stating the grounds and particulars in

    terms of Article181(a), (b) and (c) of the Constitution upon which the

    proposed Motion is made. the notice of motion shall be signed by the

    proposing Member, in affirmation that the particulars of the by at least a

    third of all the Members as affirmation that the allegations therein are

    true of their own knowledge and belief on the basis of their reading and

    appreciation of information pertinent thereto and each of them sign a

    verification form provided by the clerk for that purpose.

    (2) The Clerk shall submit the proposed motion to the Speaker forapproval.

    (3) A member who has obtained the approval of the Speaker to move a

    Motion under paragraph (1) shall, give a seven days notice notice calling

    for impeachment of the Governor.

    (4) Upon the expiry of seven (7) days, after notice is given, the Motion

    shall be placed on the Order Paper and shall be disposed of within three

    days; provided that if the county assembly is not then sitting,the speakershall surmon the assembly to meet on and cause the motion to be

    considered at the meeting after notice has been given.

    (5) When the Order for the Motion is read, the Speaker shall refuse to

    allow the member to move the motion, unless the Speaker is satisfied

    that the member is supported by at least a third of all Members of the

    County Assembly to move the motion;provided that within the seven

    days notice, the clerk shall cause to be prepared and deposited in his

    office a list of all members of the county assembly with an open space

    agnaist each name for purposes of appending signatures, which list shall

    be entitled SIGNATURE IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR

    REMOVAL OF THE GOVERNOR BY IMPEACHEMENT.

  • 8/10/2019 COMMUNICATION 40 -FINAL-PDF FILE.pdf

    3/4

    (6) Any signature appended to the list as provided under paragraph (5)

    shall not be withdrawn.

    (7) When the Motion has been passed by two-thirds of all members of

    the County Assembly, the Speaker shall, by way of a message, inform theSpeaker of the Senate of that resolution within seven days.

    Honorable Members,

    In this regard, and having been satisfied that the motion had met the requisite threshold

    based on the signatures as submitted to my office as required by the highlighted Orders, I

    did approve the notice of motion and as a matter of procedure the Assembly Business

    Committee did schedule the giving of notice of motion today Wednesday 3rd December,

    2014 during the morning sitting.

    Honorable Members,

    However, My Office did receive five formal complaints from some members of this

    Assembly denouncing the signatures as contained in the form attached to the motion.

    Noting that the standing orders 60(1), (2) And (3) do not contemplate a situation where

    members can denounce the signatures and thus do not provide for what happens when such

    circumstances arise at that stage, therefore the question that arises under the circumstances is

    that, had I received these complaints before approving the notice of motion, would I

    approve the motion? Certainly not!

    Its noteworthy, to mention that the speaker and the in fact the Assembly has no capacity to

    authenticate the validity or otherwise of signatures.

    Honorable Members,

    In view of the above mentioned unprecedented occurrences and pursuant to Standing Order

    1 of the Interim Orders of the Assembly where the speaker has powers to decide on any

    procedural question in cases where the standing Orders of County Assembly do not

    expressly provide for, the Chair as the custodian of the Standing Orders, which comprise therules of this Assembly is bound to follow the rules and procedures that have been set out as

    well as be guided by convections and practices from other Parliaments.

    Honorable Members,

    In other jurisdictions, a similar scenario was encountered by the former speaker of the

    National Assembly, Hon. Kaparo while ruling on similar matter where, a Member of

  • 8/10/2019 COMMUNICATION 40 -FINAL-PDF FILE.pdf

    4/4

    Parliament had retracted his signature in resignation letter when the signature had already

    been confirmed by handwriting experts. Speaker Kaparo in his verdict ruled that although he

    agreed with the determination of the handwriting signature experts, nevertheless the Speaker

    left the matter to the conscience of the Member to prick himself.

    Honorable Members,

    In view of the above and for purposes of preserving the Orders and continuity of the

    Assembly while appreciating that the removal processes are neither simple nor

    straightforward, therefore I wish to guide the Assembly as follows;

    1. Considering that the provision of Standing Order 60(1),(2) and (3) have not

    contemplated a situation where a member having signed in support of the motion for

    removal of the governor can denounce and or withdraw his/her signature at the stage

    when the approval has been obtained from the Speaker to give the notice of motion, I

    hereby direct that the Procedure and Rules Committee to interrogate the mentioned

    Orders and give the Assembly a report for the Assembly to pronounce itself on the

    matter.

    2. Given the formal denouncement of the signatures contained in the form attached to the

    motion for removal of the Governor by the five members of this Assembly, the

    threshold required under the Standing Orders to give notice of motion has not been

    attained.

    3.

    Consequently the notice of the motion for removal of the Governor by impeachment

    under the circumstances cannot proceed.

    Thank you!

    The Hon. Gathii Irungu, MCA

    SPEAKER OF THE KIAMBU COUNTY ASSEMBLY

    December 3, 2014