Upload
teigra
View
59
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cold Antimatter at CERN. The ATHENA, ALPHA and AEGIS Experiments at the AD. Lars V. J ø rgensen – Swansea Univ. / CERN. Outline. What is antimatter? Why is it interesting? Pure research Practical uses? How do we make it? Making atoms of it Holding on to the atoms. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Cold Antimatter at CERN
The ATHENA, ALPHA and AEGIS Experiments at the AD
Lars V. JLars V. Jøørgensen – Swansea Univ. / CERNrgensen – Swansea Univ. / CERN
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Outline• What is antimatter?• Why is it interesting?
• Pure research• Practical uses?
• How do we make it?• Making atoms of it• Holding on to the atoms
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Antimatter – What is it?
An equation from Quantum MechanicsAn equation from Quantum Mechanics
X = KX = K22
Has 2 solutionsHas 2 solutions•One positiveOne positive•One negativeOne negative
Positive solution fits normal matterPositive solution fits normal matteri.e. electron, protons, etc.i.e. electron, protons, etc.
What is the negative solution ???What is the negative solution ???
Dirac’s equation:Dirac’s equation:(1928)(1928)
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Antimatter – What is it?
Anti-particles:• Opposite charge• Same mass• Exactly cancels out it’s normal
matter ‘partner’
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
The first antimatter is discovered.
Carl Anderson at Cal TechCarl Anderson at Cal Techobserves the first positron observes the first positron from cosmic ray showersfrom cosmic ray showers in 1932in 1932 Quick Nobel Prizes:Quick Nobel Prizes:
Dirac 1933Dirac 1933Anderson 1936Anderson 1936
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Discovering more anti-particles
E = m c
Surrounding Edward Lofgren (center), head of the Bevatron, are discoverers of the antiproton, (left to right) E.Segre, C.Wiegand, O. Chamberlain and T.Ypsilantis.
22
Mass is energy (nuclear power)Mass is energy (nuclear power)-But also: Energy is massBut also: Energy is mass
High Energy Physics !!High Energy Physics !!
Pair Creation:Pair Creation:With high enough energyWith high enough energya pair of matter-antimattera pair of matter-antimatterParticles can be createdParticles can be created
Antiproton – 1955Antiproton – 1955Antineutron – 1957Antineutron – 1957Antideuteron – 1965Antideuteron – 1965Antihelium-3 – 2011!Antihelium-3 – 2011!
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Anti – atoms?• In 1995 9 atoms of antihydrogen was
made at CERN’s LEAR machine• All these atoms were at very high
energy• To study antihydrogen we need it at
much lower energies
CERN’s LEAR MachineCERN’s LEAR Machine
CERN built the CERN built the AD (Antiproton Decelerator)AD (Antiproton Decelerator)to achieve this!to achieve this!It started operation in 2000It started operation in 2000
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Why is antimatter interesting?
Why are we here?• If the Big Bang was Pair Creation there should
be equal amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe
• We know from measurements that there is almost no antimatter in the universe
• Why is this ??
Antimatter at the Antimatter at the center of the Milky Waycenter of the Milky Way
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
CPT tests
• Spectroscopy – checking if the energy-levels are the same in hydrogen and antihydrogen
• This tests some very fundamental theories in physics – the standard model and the CPT Theorem (C=charge, P=parity and T=time)
Fundamental studies of anti-hydrogen “Hänsch Plot”
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Does antimatter fall down ??
Gravity is a very, very weak forcecompared to the other forcese.g. Electro-magnetism
What about Gravity?
This makes an experiment VERY This makes an experiment VERY difficultdifficult - but neutral atoms are necesary- but neutral atoms are necesary
New experiment at the AD now under construction:New experiment at the AD now under construction:AEGIS - Antimatter Experiment: Gravity, Interferometry, SpectroscopyAEGIS - Antimatter Experiment: Gravity, Interferometry, Spectroscopy
Theory is not so clear ! Theory is not so clear ! ... But most people expect it to behave like matter... But most people expect it to behave like matter
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Are there practical things where antimatter might be useful ?• PET scanners (Positron Emission
Tomography)• Treating cancer with antiprotons
(The ACE experiment)
Passing into the antiworld?
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
ADAD
PSPS
LINAC2LINAC2
FranceFranceSwitzerlandSwitzerland
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
How do we make anti-matter ?
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Making antihydrogen
• We take antiprotons and slow them down MUCH, MUCH more
• We collect a lot of positrons• We get them together• They make antihydrogen and fly to the wall• We detect them
ep_
+
Na22 source
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Detecting that we have made antihydrogen• We build a detector that can
measure the annihilation of an antiproton and a positron at the same time and at the same place
Silicon microstrips
CsIcrystals
511 keV
511 keV
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Next step: Trapping antihydrogen
• Antihydrogen or hydrogen are tiny magnets – kinda!
• We use this to try to trap them• Difficult as charged antiprotons and positrons
must also survive• Very weak trapping field: 1 T ~ max. 0.7 K
quadrupole winding mirror coils
Ioffe-Pritchard Geometry
How How ??????
Antihydrogen Trapped!Antihydrogen Trapped!NatureNature, , 17 Nov. 201017 Nov. 2010
More antihydrogen More antihydrogen trapped trapped
for 1000 seconds!for 1000 seconds!Nature PhysicsNature Physics, , 5 June 20115 June 2011
How ALPHA did it!
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Ready for spectroscopy?
Antihydrogen trappedAntihydrogen in ground stateSurvives for a long timeNot very many anti-atoms at any
given time (max 1 so far)No laser access yetMicrowaves !!
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
The AEGIS experiment
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
Measuring Measuring gg for antihydrogenfor antihydrogento about 1%to about 1%
Does Does antimatter fall antimatter fall
up ??up ??
- Under constructionUnder construction- Should take first Should take first beam at end of 2011beam at end of 2011- Results? 2014-2015?Results? 2014-2015?
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
See the real thing!!!
Let’s go down to the AD and have a look!!!Let’s go down to the AD and have a look!!!
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
35 physicists
The ATHENA CollaborationThe ATHENA Collaboration
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
The ALPHA CollaborationThe ALPHA Collaboration
Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011Lars V. Jørgensen – CERN - June 23, 2011
LAPP, Annecy, France G. Drobychev, D. Sillou
Queen’s U Belfast, UK G. Gribakin, H.R.J.Walters
INFN Firenze, Italy G.Ferrari, M. Prevedelli, G. Tino
CERN M. Doser, A. Duradev, T. Eisel, F. Haug, T. Niinikoski, D. Perini , J. Bremer
INFN Genova, Italy C. Carraro, V. Lagomarsino, G. Manuzio, G. Testera, R. Vaccarone, S. Zavatarelli
MPI-K Heidelberg C. Canali, R. Heyne, A. Fischer, A. Kellerbauer, C. Morhard, U. Warring
Kirchoff Inst. Of Phys., Heidelberg, Germany M. Oberthaler
INFN Milano, Italy I. Boscolo, N. Brambilla, F. Castelli, S. Cialdi, L. Formaro, A. Gervasini, M. Giammarchi, F. Leveraro, A. Vairo
INR Moscow, Russia A.S. Belov, S. Gninenko, V. A. Matveev, A. V. Turbabin
ITEP Moscow, Russia W. M. Byakov, S. V. Stepanov , D.S. Zvezhinskij
Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France P.Nedelec
New York Univ. USA H.H. Stroke
University of Oslo and University of Bergen, Norway O. Rohne, S. Stapnes, H. Sandacker
INFN Pavia-Brescia, Italy G.Bonomi, A. Fontana, C. Riccardi, A. Rotondi, A. Zenoni
Czech Tech. Univ, Prague, Czech Republic V. Petracek, D. Krasnicky
IRNE Sofia, Bulgary N. Djurelov
INFN Padova-Trento, Italy R.S. Brusa, D. Fabris, M. Lunardon, S. Mariazzi, S. Moretto, G. Nebbia, S. Pesente, G. Viesti
ETH Zurich, Switzerland S.D. Hogan, F. Merkt
Qatar University I. Y. Al-Qaradawi, L. V. Jørgensen
PolitecnicoMilano, Italy G. Consolati, A. Dupasquier, R. Ferragut, P. Folegati, F. Quasso
La. Aime’Cotton, Orsay, France L. Cabaret, D. Comparat