Coalescence Clarification

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    1/8

    PALMOIL ENGINEERING BULLETINNO. 105 9

    Feature Article

    * Malaysian Palm Oil Board, P. O. Box 10620, 50720Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    **Concept Engineering Sdn Bhd, No. 29 & 31, JalanIndustri USJ 1/4, 47600 Subang Jaya, Selangor,

    Malaysia.E-mail: [email protected]

    Coalescing Clarifier for Crude Palm OilClarification

    Mohamad Sulong*; Ronnie C W Tan** and Krisada Chavananand**

    W

    FUNDAMENTALS

    hen oil passes throughinterspaces between thecoalescence plate separatorplate, it imparts shear

    forces to the small oil particles causingthem to agglomerate, thereby preventingthe formation of emulsion. As a result, thediameter of the oil particles become large

    and separation eciency improves.

    BASIS FOR SIZING AND SELECTION

    For liquid-liquid coalescers, as with anyprocess equipment, successful sizingand selection is always a combination ofempirical observation/experience andanalytical modelling.

    Of the three steps in coalescing, i.e.

    droplet capture, combining of the collecteddroplets and gravity separation of theenlarged droplets the rst and the lastcan be modelled with good accuracyand repeatability. The modelling of themiddle and the actual coalescing step isa complex function of surface tension and

    viscous eects, droplet momentum andthe dynamics of sizes of the droplets in thedispersion.

    Two units were designed for a 60 t FFBhr-1 palm oil mill that used a conventionalvertical clarier tank as shown in Figures1 and 2. The material used for theconstruction of the coalescence separatorwas stainless steel SS 316 inserts, in a mild

    steel casing with insulation thermal controland ow control equipment.

    a

    b

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    2/8

    PALMOILENGINEERINGBULLETINNO. 10510

    Feature Article

    c d

    e f

    g h

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    3/8

    PALMOIL ENGINEERING BULLETINNO. 105 11

    FeatureArticle

    i j

    Figure 1. Coalescing clarier (OILSEP) rst generation (Indonesia).

    Figure 2. Coalescing clarier (OILSEP) at Vichitbhan oil mill second generation.

    OILSEP DEVELOPMENT HISTORY

    Years Events

    2000

    2002

    2005 2008

    2009

    2009

    2010

    R&D with MPOB. Tested pilot unit at Krau Palm Oil Mill.

    First units installed in a mill in Indonesia. First generation.

    Three units in operation in Thailand.

    Two units installed in Thailand for mill upgrading.

    Discussion with interested parties: Univanich (Thailand),Papua New Guinea, Keck Seng (Malaysia), West Africa.

    Planning to conduct testing on OILSEP without dilution.

    k

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    4/8

    PALMOILENGINEERINGBULLETINNO. 10512

    Feature Article

    TYPICAL PERFORMANCE OF A SLUDGE SEPARATOR

    Average ow rate: 11 800 kg hr-1 with 1.8 mm nozzle showing a strong correlation betweenoil content in feed and the oil content in the centrifuge heavy phase.

    Figure 3. Oil in underow of coalesce clarier Vichitbahan oil mill.

    Figure 4. Average material ow into centrifuge.

    Figure 5. Infeed oil content conventional clarier.

    k

    g

    hr-

    1

    16

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0

    (000)

    Day

    Day

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    5/8

    PALMOIL ENGINEERING BULLETINNO. 105 13

    Figure 6. Centrifuge heavy phase oil content.

    Figure 8. Oil in the underow of the coalescer clarier Vichitbahan oil mill.

    COMPARISON OF OIL CONTENT IN THE UNDERFLOW OF THE OIL CLARIFIER

    Average 6.82% Average 7.72%

    Average 11.7%

    Figure 7. Infeed oil content conventional clarier.

    FeatureArticle

    Day

    Day

    Day

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    6/8

    PALMOILENGINEERINGBULLETINNO. 10514

    Figure 9. Material balance of conventional crude palm oil clarier.

    Figure 10. Material balance of coalescing clarier (OILSEP).

    Figures 3 and 6 give the performance of the sludge separated, while Figures 7 and 10 give theperformance of the coalescing clarier (OILSEP).

    PERFORMANCE COMPARISON

    Tables 2 and 3 show the performance data of the oil separator (OILSEP) and the verticalclarier. OILSEP seems to outperform vertical clarier in almost all activities except in thecost which is more than double.

    CONCLUSION

    OILSEP utilises coalescing principle to enhance stokes gravity settling. This device also helpsto agglomerate small oil droplets formed during emulsication of crude oil slurry resulting in

    better oil recovery in a short oil retention time. The process also complies with good millingpractices as all parts in contact with oil are made of stainless steel.

    Feature Article

    Flow 36 000 kg hr-1

    Oil 35% 12 600 kg hr-1

    VM 58% 20 880 kg hr-1

    NOS 7% 2520 kg hr-1

    Flow 10 551 kg hr-1

    Oil 98.9% 12 600 kg hr-1

    VM 0.82% 85.0 kg hr-1

    NOS 0.28% 29 kg hr-1

    Flow 25449 kg hr-1

    Oil 8.5% 12 600 kg hr-1

    VM 81.7% 20 795 kg hr-1

    NOS 9.8% 2491 kg hr-1

    1946.7 kg hr-1 oil

    216.3 kg hr-1 oil (3.6 kg t-1 FFB)

    RT= 4-7 hr

    Flow 11 985.6 kg hr-1

    Oil 99.5% 10 985.6 kg hr-1

    VM 0.47% 52.6 kg hr-1

    NOS 0.03% 3.5 kg hr-1

    Flow 24 958.3 kg hr-1

    Oil 6.5% 1614.4 kg hr-1

    VM 83.5% 20 827.4 kg hr-1

    NOS 10% 2516.5 kg hr-1

    Flow 36000 kg hr-1

    Oil 35% 12 600 kg hr-1

    VM 58% 20 880 kg hr-1

    NOS 7% 2520 kg hr-1

    1453 kg hr-1 oil

    161.4 kg hr-1 oil (2.6 kg t-1 FFB)

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    7/8

    PALMOIL ENGINEERING BULLETINNO. 105 15

    TABLE 1. COMPARISON BETWEEN OILSEP AND VERTICAL CLARIFIER

    Description OILSEP Vertical clarifer Remarks

    Oil recovery 12 438 kg hr-1 12 383.7 kg hr-1 54.9 kg hr-1

    Oil content (underow) 5% - 7% 8.0% - 12% OILSEP very consistentFeeding and temperaturecontrol

    Automatic90C 2C

    Normally non-auto95C 98C

    Low temperature minimisequality deterioration

    Oil quality DOBI2.6 2.8

    DOBI2.0 2.5

    Consistent

    Retention time 1 1.5 hr 4 7 hr Oil ow out within 45 min

    Footprint for oil room 9 m x 6.5 m x 6 m (H) Much bigger Depends on tank size

    Material of construction Housing 304 SSInserts 316 SS

    304 SS lining Complies with CoP of millsLong life

    Note: DOBI deterioration of bleachability index.CoP- code of practices.

    TABLE 2. COMPARISON BETWEEN OILSEP AND VERTICAL CLARIFIER

    Description OILSEP Vertical clarifer Remarks

    Maintenance andcleaning

    Very easy Time consuming High pressure water jetfor inserts cleaning

    Puricationrequirement

    Not required Yes Cleaner oil

    Automation Fully auto, ow control,temperature control

    Partial in someinstallation

    Ensuring laminar ow forbetter oil coalescing

    System performance Dynamic constantshearing of crude slurry

    Static, no barrier forsolid movement

    OILSEP is a dynamicsystem

    Total surface area 150 m2 surface forshearing action

    No shearing surface OILSEP surface area isequivalent to 200 t verticalclarier

    TABLE 3. COMPARISON BETWEEN OILSEP AND VERTICAL CLARIFIER

    Description OILSEP Vertical clarifer RemarksInvestment cost RM 1.4 million RM 600 00 RM 800 000

    Return oninvestment

    0.86 year new millcompared to verticalclarier1.52 years if installed inexisting oil room

    - Overall oil recover = 54.9 kg hr-1or 1098 kg day-1 at 20 hr day-1 or1098 kg x 350 day yr-1 = 384.3 tyr-1 x RM 2400 t -1= RM 922 320

    FeatureArticle

  • 7/27/2019 Coalescence Clarification

    8/8

    PALMOILENGINEERINGBULLETINNO. 10516