1
travel through the attached device, the clinician’s eye is removed from the ophthalmoscope’s viewing hole. This reduces the field of view of the patient’s fundus. In order to eliminate this problem, the design has since been incorporated within the exist- ing housing of a conventional direct ophthalmo- scope. In due course, a randomised trial will evaluate the impact of this new teaching ophthalmo- scope on the teaching and assessment of medical students in fundoscopy. REFERENCE 1 Gupta RR, Lam W-C. Medical students’ self-confidence in performing direct ophthalmoscopy in clinical training. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41 (2):16974. Correspondence: Christopher Schulz, Department of Anatomy, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9PX, UK. Tel: 00 44 1273 877810; E-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.1111/medu.12434 Clinical sketches: teaching medical illustration to medical students Kevin T Liou, Paul George, Jay M Baruch & Franc ßois I Luks What problem was addressed? Many physicians draw. We are not all artists, but we often use pictures instead of thousands of words, whether to explain medical concepts to students or procedures to patients. Cultural, language and educational barriers may hinder verbal communication, and the use of simplified diagrams can enhance patients’ under- standing of their medical condition. 1 Of course, not all sketches are created equal. But just as medical students can be taught how to communicate better with patients and colleagues, so too can they develop the rudiments of sketching as an acquired rather than an innate talent. What was tried? Rather than teaching detailed artistic illustration to a few ‘talented’ individuals, we sought to inculcate basic graphic rules to a large group of medical students. Twenty-three first-year medical students with different artistic backgrounds participated in our medical illustration workshop as part of an arts and humanities-based curriculum. We emphasised three aspects of illustration as a tool: (i) organising one’s thoughts and clarifying anatomic relationships; (ii) using the optimal complexity level of a sketch to illustrate a problem most clearly, and (iii) choosing the most representative aspects or steps of a procedure. The workshop combined a pre- sentation on the historical role of medical illustra- tion, discussions on why it remains relevant today, and hands-on exercises on the principles of basic drawing, perspective, lighting, shadows, shading and texture. In one exercise, we asked students to simplify head and neck plates from an anatomy atlas in order to make them easily understandable by a patient. In another, students worked in pairs: one student illustrated adult and foetal blood circulation with the aid of diagrams and the other provided feed- back. Finally, we showed a video of a laparoscopic adrenalectomy and asked students to illustrate the operation, limiting themselves to only three figures. With this added constraint, students had to decide whether to include or leave out certain steps. The ability to select which details are relevant to the lar- ger picture to offer an accurate synthesis is also essential in non-visual aspects of clinical practice, such as in formulating diagnoses and delivering oral presentations. What lessons were learned? A total of 85% of students rated the workshop ‘valuable’ or ‘very valu- able’. Although the intent was not to complement anatomy classes, it may have been more useful, in retrospect, to match the technical aspects with the students’ anatomic knowledge. In future workshops, we plan to coordinate the drawing exercises with anatomy instructors and to select topics that have already been covered. Interestingly, some students commented that our illustration exercises high- lighted gaps in their anatomy knowledge base, revealing connections between anatomical structures they had not noticed before. Many questions remain. Is basic illustration a skill for all, or a tool for the artistic few? When and for how long should it be taught? How can it be use- ful to all, regardless of specialty interests? Does it really make us better communicators? And how do we measure this? REFERENCE 1 Stone CA. Can a picture really paint a thousand words? Aesth Plast Surg 2000;24:18591. Correspondence: Franc ßois I Luks, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 2 Dudley Street, Suite 190, Providence, Rhode Island 02905, NJ, USA. Tel: 00 1 401 228 0556; E-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.1111/medu.12450 ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2014; 48: 522–548 525 really good stuff

Clinical sketches: teaching medical illustration to medical students

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Clinical sketches: teaching medical illustration to medical students

travel through the attached device, the clinician’seye is removed from the ophthalmoscope’s viewinghole. This reduces the field of view of the patient’sfundus. In order to eliminate this problem, thedesign has since been incorporated within the exist-ing housing of a conventional direct ophthalmo-scope. In due course, a randomised trial willevaluate the impact of this new teaching ophthalmo-scope on the teaching and assessment of medicalstudents in fundoscopy.

REFERENCE

1 Gupta RR, Lam W-C. Medical students’ self-confidencein performing direct ophthalmoscopy in clinicaltraining. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41 (2):169–74.

Correspondence: Christopher Schulz, Department of Anatomy,Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex,Brighton BN1 9PX, UK. Tel: 00 44 1273 877810;E-mail: [email protected]

doi: 10.1111/medu.12434

Clinical sketches: teaching medical illustration tomedical students

Kevin T Liou, Paul George, Jay M Baruch &Franc�ois I Luks

What problem was addressed? Many physiciansdraw. We are not all artists, but we often use picturesinstead of thousands of words, whether to explainmedical concepts to students or procedures topatients. Cultural, language and educational barriersmay hinder verbal communication, and the use ofsimplified diagrams can enhance patients’ under-standing of their medical condition.1 Of course, notall sketches are created equal. But just as medicalstudents can be taught how to communicate betterwith patients and colleagues, so too can they developthe rudiments of sketching as an acquired ratherthan an innate talent.What was tried? Rather than teaching detailedartistic illustration to a few ‘talented’ individuals, wesought to inculcate basic graphic rules to a largegroup of medical students. Twenty-three first-yearmedical students with different artistic backgroundsparticipated in our medical illustration workshop aspart of an arts and humanities-based curriculum. Weemphasised three aspects of illustration as a tool: (i)organising one’s thoughts and clarifying anatomicrelationships; (ii) using the optimal complexity level

of a sketch to illustrate a problem most clearly, and(iii) choosing the most representative aspects orsteps of a procedure. The workshop combined a pre-sentation on the historical role of medical illustra-tion, discussions on why it remains relevant today,and hands-on exercises on the principles of basicdrawing, perspective, lighting, shadows, shading andtexture.In one exercise, we asked students to simplify

head and neck plates from an anatomy atlas in orderto make them easily understandable by a patient. Inanother, students worked in pairs: one studentillustrated adult and foetal blood circulation withthe aid of diagrams and the other provided feed-back. Finally, we showed a video of a laparoscopicadrenalectomy and asked students to illustrate theoperation, limiting themselves to only three figures.With this added constraint, students had to decidewhether to include or leave out certain steps. Theability to select which details are relevant to the lar-ger picture – to offer an accurate synthesis – is alsoessential in non-visual aspects of clinical practice,such as in formulating diagnoses and delivering oralpresentations.What lessons were learned? A total of 85% ofstudents rated the workshop ‘valuable’ or ‘very valu-able’. Although the intent was not to complementanatomy classes, it may have been more useful, inretrospect, to match the technical aspects with thestudents’ anatomic knowledge. In future workshops,we plan to coordinate the drawing exercises withanatomy instructors and to select topics that havealready been covered. Interestingly, some studentscommented that our illustration exercises high-lighted gaps in their anatomy knowledge base,revealing connections between anatomical structuresthey had not noticed before.Many questions remain. Is basic illustration a skill

for all, or a tool for the artistic few? When – and forhow long – should it be taught? How can it be use-ful to all, regardless of specialty interests? Does itreally make us better communicators? And how dowe measure this?

REFERENCE

1 Stone CA. Can a picture really paint a thousandwords? Aesth Plast Surg 2000;24:185–91.

Correspondence: Franc�ois I Luks, Department of Paediatric Surgery,Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 2 Dudley Street, Suite190, Providence, Rhode Island 02905, NJ, USA. Tel: 00 1 401 2280556; E-mail: [email protected]

doi: 10.1111/medu.12450

ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2014; 48: 522–548 525

really good stuff