Citywide Network Ranking Summary 20111201

  • Published on
    29-Oct-2014

  • View
    144

  • Download
    14

Transcript

2010-2011 Network Rankings2010-2011 PR Percentile (45% of final score) Metric Peer Value Horizon 0.70 86% 0.48 66% 0.67 90% 0.48 59% 0.69 85% 0.52 74% 0.60 61% 0.57 56% 0.61 60% 0.46 55% 0.56 82% 0.55 87% 0.59 97% 0.56 72% 0.48 60% 0.55 66% 0.50 50% 0.65 77% 0.40 34% 0.49 31% 0.54 81% 0.60 71% 0.52 43% 0.64 73% 0.54 64% 0.64 69% 0.39 29% 0.57 61% 0.56 67% 0.40 33% 0.39 28% 0.45 34% 0.49 63% 0.43 43% 0.48 59% 0.48 43% 0.54 48% 0.57 58% 0.48 41% 0.44 33% 0.47 45% 0.48 34% 0.45 51% 0.44 24% Most Recent Quality Review Qualitative Evaluation (20% of final score) (20% of final score) Metric Peer Metric Value Horizon Value Percentile 77.8 98% 3.34 91% 71.9 77% 3.26 86% 73.8 70% 3.10 77% 66.8 36% 3.68 100% 72.4 50% 3.32 88% 71.7 74% 3.12 81% 74.9 66% 3.49 95% 75.1 78% 3.60 96% 74.8 66% 3.38 93% 71.3 74% 2.94 67% 66.8 31% 3.10 77% 71.3 74% 2.36 12% 60.0 0% 3.00 70% 73.0 78% 2.68 40% 73.5 91% 2.68 42% 71.7 61% 2.88 58% 72.5 72% 3.10 75% 71.8 48% 2.66 39% 68.1 40% 3.32 89% 76.1 85% 3.20 84% 64.1 12% 2.86 54% 71.1 51% 2.60 30% 73.5 64% 2.96 68% 68.6 18% 2.90 60% 70.9 59% 2.51 26% 73.8 57% 2.44 19% 64.2 15% 3.64 98% 71.3 50% 2.64 35% 68.3 29% 2.74 46% 72.4 79% 2.82 51% 65.8 29% 3.18 82% 70.0 56% 3.06 74% 70.8 68% 1.98 0% 70.7 67% 2.62 33% 68.1 44% 2.54 28% 68.7 42% 2.90 60% 74.6 74% 2.26 9% 73.8 68% 2.20 5% 66.0 21% 3.00 70% 71.7 73% 2.60 30% 68.4 47% 2.64 35% 70.2 45% 2.71 44% 66.7 35% 2.38 16% 70.5 47% 2.80 47% Principal Satisfaction Survey Spring 2011 (15% of final score) Metric Value 0.96 0.80 0.71 0.94 0.79 0.79 0.89 0.83 0.81 0.77 0.73 0.86 0.73 0.74 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.75 0.78 0.87 0.70 0.78 0.89 0.69 0.84 0.80 0.77 0.77 0.74 0.67 0.67 0.82 0.76 0.85 0.68 0.70 0.74 0.54 0.78 0.84 0.74 0.84 0.81 0.92

Additional Credit

2011 Quartile 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2010-2011 Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44

Network N409 N401 N101 N534 N204 N607 N207 N202 N103 N408 N404 N601 N403 N106 N104 N303 N203 N107 N109 N102 N562 N561 N605 N609 N532 N205 N606 N405 N108 N307 N603 N209 N304 N511 N563 N410 N531 N208 N406 N306 N309 N602 N551 N301

Network Leader Final Score Opromalla, Neal 91.0 Brown, Alice 84.2 Cofield, Marina 80.5 Colavito, William/Waxman, Benjamin 77.8 Foley, Diane 77.6 Myers, Elmer 76.3 Miller, Peggy 72.8 Dimaggio, Nancy/Selenikas, Vivian 72.4 Chu, Yuet 70.9 Young, Lucius 69.6 Byam, Terry 69.2 Block, Lawrence 69.2 Bradbury, Marisol 68.5 Kerr, Cynthia 67.2 Cohen, Robert 66.6 Lavin, Kathleen 65.9 Feigelson, Daniel 64.5 Scala, Nancy 63.3 Quail, Maria 63.1 Cassidy, Joseph/Sheehan, Alison 60.8 Gambino, Barbara 60.0 Smith, Derek 59.9 Karp, Wendy 59.3 Van Nostrand, Debra 58.8 Colavito, William/Cohen, Alan 58.6 Joyner Wells, Joanne/Straus, Marguerite 58.1 Palazzo, Petrina 57.2 Ditolla, Karen 56.3 Kaufhold, Sumita 56.1 Orlando, Ada 56.0 Cintron, Richard 54.8 Purus, Daniel/Wilks, Marlene 53.6 Lewis, Lucile 53.3 Hastings, Calvin/Montesano, Patrick 52.2 Penzell, Alexis 51.1 Santana, Altagracia 50.3 Colavito, William/Serrant, Althea 49.1 Omahoney, John 48.9 Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra 48.3 Nell, Margarita 47.9 Rodriguez-Torres, Martha/Tubridy, Pat 47.6 Bove, Julia 45.7 Batisti, Anita/Struk, Margaret 45.3 Brucella, Joanne 43.6

0.10 0.10

0.05

0.10

0.10

0.05 0.10

Page 1 of 74

2011.12.01

2010-2011 Network Rankings2010-2011 PR Percentile (45% of final score) Metric Peer Value Horizon 0.46 31% 0.39 17% 0.44 21% 0.47 36% 0.38 26% 0.43 35% 0.57 50% 0.42 16% 0.44 27% 0.44 27% 0.35 13% 0.41 7% 0.36 0% 0.32 3% Most Recent Quality Review Qualitative Evaluation (20% of final score) (20% of final score) Metric Peer Metric Value Horizon Value Percentile 68.1 27% 2.92 63% 69.8 59% 2.82 51% 69.2 28% 2.87 56% 68.1 40% 2.46 21% 67.3 32% 2.80 47% 67.6 39% 2.32 11% 67.2 0% 2.36 12% 66.0 22% 2.92 65% 69.3 50% 2.00 2% 67.3 37% 2.24 7% 68.0 40% 2.46 21% 74.4 64% 2.46 21% 70.3 37% 2.40 18% 67.9 46% 2.14 4% Principal Satisfaction Survey Spring 2011 (15% of final score) Metric Value 0.77 0.80 0.90 0.68 0.72 0.80 0.76 0.78 0.77 0.79 0.84 0.69 0.75 0.72

Additional Credit

2011 Quartile 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2010-2011 Rank 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58

Network N206 N608 N533 N105 N402 N308 N201 N411 N110 N302 N407 N604 N521 N310

Network Leader Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Rupnarain, Rudy Colavito, William/Ramos, Nancy Fagan, Patrick/Green, Jon Gonzalez, Jacqueline Pelles, Kathy Beirne, Gerard Sharrock, Emily Smith, Charlene German, Roz Mcdonald, Varleton Jaenicke, Gregory Conrad, Cass Young, Yvonne

Final Score 43.3 41.7 39.6 38.8 38.5 37.8 36.5 36.4 34.2 32.8 30.8 30.2 22.1 21.9

Page 2 of 74

2011.12.01

2010-2011 Network Rankings

2008-2009 Rank 33 37 25 28 17 2 18 4/6 26 3 29 7 27 13 15 12 19 9 5 22 53 53 49 46 23/50 71 58 10 16 11 42 55/24 57 8 53 56 50 41 35/32 45 21/63 52 30 31

2009-2010 Rank 14 30 15 17 12 3 24 9/5 19 7 26 6 33 16 39 22 25 4 11 17 45 46 42 50 20/29 58 61 10 28 2 65 32/18 53 21 45 51 37 23 13/39 49 35/64 63 38 48

Page 3 of 74

2011.12.01

2010-2011 Network Rankings

2008-2009 Rank 43/59 39 54 44 51 47 40 34 68 64 38 46 48 62

2009-2010 Rank 36/68 27 67 43 47 60 56 41 66 69 55 59 31 62

Page 4 of 74

2011.12.01

Network N402 N109 N407 N401 N511 N310 N603 N307 N606 N534 N104 N601 N408 N551 N304 N607 N563 N308 N562 N403 N608 N309 N306 N302 N404 N411 N105 N110 N209 N106 N203 N532 N410 N406 N303 N108 N206 N301 N602 N561 N405 N101 N208 N521

Network Leader Gonzalez, Jacqueline Quail, Maria Mcdonald, Varleton Brown, Alice Hastings, Calvin/Montesano, Patrick Young, Yvonne Cintron, Richard Orlando, Ada Palazzo, Petrina Colavito, William/Waxman, Benjamin Cohen, Robert Block, Lawrence Young, Lucius Batisti, Anita/Struk, Margaret Lewis, Lucile Myers, Elmer Penzell, Alexis Pelles, Kathy Gambino, Barbara Bradbury, Marisol Rupnarain, Rudy Rodriguez-Torres, Martha/Tubridy, Pat Nell, Margarita German, Roz Byam, Terry Sharrock, Emily Fagan, Patrick/Green, Jon Smith, Charlene Purus, Daniel/Wilks, Marlene Kerr, Cynthia Feigelson, Daniel Colavito, William/Cohen, Alan Santana, Altagracia Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra Lavin, Kathleen Kaufhold, Sumita Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Brucella, Joanne Bove, Julia Smith, Derek Ditolla, Karen Cofield, Marina Omahoney, John Conrad, Cass

Peer Index 0.815 0.789 0.789 0.784 0.780 0.749 0.708 0.707 0.692 0.687 0.685 0.668 0.662 0.654 0.646 0.634 0.623 0.623 0.603 0.603 0.601 0.588 0.566 0.565 0.560 0.544 0.541 0.537 0.537 0.508 0.502 0.497 0.494 0.493 0.490 0.485 0.479 0.465 0.417 0.406 0.398 0.398 0.393 0.383

Peer Group Size 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30

20102011 PR metric 0.376 0.400 0.349 0.483 0.431 0.318 0.389 0.404 0.394 0.476 0.478 0.545 0.465 0.454 0.488 0.518 0.485 0.428 0.541 0.585 0.394 0.467 0.444 0.436 0.557 0.419 0.465 0.442 0.454 0.563 0.502 0.542 0.482 0.481 0.554 0.560 0.456 0.438 0.476 0.601 0.569 0.674 0.570 0.361

Peer mean 0.435 0.438 0.438 0.443 0.450 0.448 0.448 0.448 0.448 0.452 0.451 0.451 0.451 0.451 0.455 0.456 0.462 0.464 0.469 0.471 0.475 0.480 0.481 0.484 0.490 0.493 0.500 0.500 0.497 0.501 0.502 0.503 0.501 0.508 0.507 0.509 0.518 0.525 0.529 0.528 0.530 0.537 0.542 0.545

N202 N531 N605 N533 N107 N102 N609 N204 N409 N201 N604 N103 N205 N207

Dimaggio, Nancy/Selenikas, Vivian Colavito, William/Serrant, Althea Karp, Wendy Colavito, William/Ramos, Nancy Scala, Nancy Cassidy, Joseph/Sheehan, Alison Van Nostrand, Debra Foley, Diane Opromalla, Neal Beirne, Gerard Jaenicke, Gregory Chu, Yuet Joyner Wells, Joanne/Straus, Marguerite Miller, Peggy

0.373 0.371 0.352 0.349 0.345 0.345 0.317 0.311 0.270 0.241 0.231 0.229 0.228 0.198

29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16

0.568 0.540 0.525 0.445 0.651 0.486 0.641 0.689 0.697 0.568 0.409 0.607 0.642 0.604

0.548 0.548 0.549 0.550 0.552 0.555 0.555 0.555 0.560 0.566 0.571 0.569 0.569 0.563

Peer std. dev. Peer min Peer max 0.063 0.309 0.561 0.062 0.314 0.563 0.060 0.317 0.558 0.063 0.317 0.570 0.069 0.312 0.589 0.069 0.310 0.585 0.067 0.314 0.583 0.066 0.317 0.579 0.064 0.319 0.576 0.067 0.319 0.585 0.065 0.320 0.582 0.064 0.323 0.580 0.063 0.325 0.577 0.062 0.327 0.575 0.064 0.327 0.583 0.064 0.329 0.584 0.064 0.334 0.589 0.063 0.339 0.590 0.059 0.351 0.587 0.061 0.349 0.593 0.062 0.350 0.600 0.055 0.369 0.590 0.053 0.374 0.588 0.051 0.381 0.586 0.053 0.385 0.596 0.055 0.384 0.602 0.063 0.373 0.627 0.064 0.372 0.629 0.069 0.360 0.634 0.069 0.362 0.639 0.070 0.363 0.642 0.070 0.363 0.642 0.070 0.361 0.642 0.074 0.361 0.656 0.074 0.359 0.654 0.076 0.356 0.661 0.080 0.358 0.678 0.085 0.354 0.696 0.084 0.361 0.698 0.086 0.357 0.700 0.087 0.357 0.703 0.086 0.365 0.710 0.086 0.370 0.714 0.086 0.374 0.716

Peer horizon score 26% 34% 13% 66% 43% 3% 28% 33% 29% 59% 60% 87% 55% 51% 63% 74% 59% 35% 81% 97% 17% 45% 33% 27% 82% 16% 36% 27% 34% 72% 50% 64% 43% 41% 66% 67% 31% 24% 34% 71% 61% 90% 58% 0%

Quality Review metric 0.673 0.681 0.680 0.719 0.707 0.679 0.658 0.724 0.642 0.668 0.735 0.713 0.713 0.667 0.708 0.717 0.681 0.676 0.641 0.600 0.698 0.684 0.717 0.673 0.668 0.660 0.681 0.693 0.700 0.730 0.725 0.709 0.687 0.660 0.717 0.683 0.681 0.705 0.702 0.711 0.713 0.738 0.738 0.703

Peer mean 0.693 0.692 0.691 0.688 0.684 0.685 0.685 0.686 0.685 0.685 0.684 0.684 0.684 0.685 0.686 0.687 0.688 0.689 0.688 0.688 0.687 0.687 0.689 0.688 0.690 0.692 0.692 0.693 0.692 0.695 0.696 0.697 0.697 0.699 0.703 0.705 0.706 0.709 0.708 0.710 0.713 0.715 0.717 0.718

Peer std. dev. Peer min Peer max 0.027 0.638 0.747 0.027 0.639 0.745 0.026 0.639 0.743 0.028 0.633 0.744 0.034 0.617 0.751 0.033 0.619 0.750 0.032 0.620 0.749 0.032 0.622 0.750 0.031 0.623 0.748 0.031 0.623 0.747 0.031 0.622 0.745 0.030 0.623 0.744 0.030 0.625 0.743 0.029 0.626 0.743 0.030 0.626 0.746 0.030 0.627 0.748 0.030 0.628 0.749 0.030 0.628 0.749 0.031 0.627 0.749 0.031 0.627 0.749 0.030 0.626 0.748 0.030 0.626 0.748 0.030 0.629 0.749 0.029 0.629 0.747 0.028 0.633 0.747 0.028 0.635 0.749 0.029 0.635 0.749 0.030 0.634 0.752 0.029 0.634 0.751 0.031 0.633 0.757 0.032 0.632 0.761 0.033 0.632 0.762 0.033 0.632 0.762 0.032 0.634 0.764 0.033 0.637 0.768 0.027 0.652 0.759 0.027 0.653 0.760 0.029 0.650 0.768 0.030 0.648 0.768 0.030 0.650 0.770 0.030 0.653 0.772 0.028 0.658 0.772 0.028 0.661 0.774 0.028 0.661 0.775

0.085 0.087 0.088 0.090 0.090 0.091 0.093 0.095 0.095 0.093 0.093 0.096 0.099 0.098

0.378 0.374 0.374 0.370 0.372 0.373 0.369 0.365 0.370 0.380 0.384 0.378 0.372 0.367

0.719 0.721 0.725 0.729 0.733 0.738 0.742 0.746 0.750 0.752 0.757 0.760 0.766 0.758

56% 48% 43% 21% 77% 31% 73% 85% 86% 50% 7% 60% 69% 61%

0.751 0.746 0.735 0.692 0.718 0.761 0.686 0.724 0.778 0.672 0.744 0.748 0.738 0.749

0.719 0.718 0.718 0.719 0.720 0.722 0.722 0.724 0.726 0.727 0.729 0.730 0.731 0.730

0.029 0.029 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.028 0.029 0.028 0.027 0.027 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.029

0.661 0.660 0.659 0.658 0.659 0.666 0.665 0.668 0.672 0.673 0.674 0.674 0.674 0.672

0.776 0.777 0.778 0.779 0.780 0.778 0.780 0.780 0.780 0.782 0.783 0.785 0.787 0.788

Peer horizon score 32% 40% 40% 77% 67% 46% 29% 79% 15% 36% 91% 74% 74% 35% 68% 74% 44% 39% 12% 0% 59% 47% 73% 37% 31% 22% 40% 50% 56% 78% 72% 59% 42% 21% 61% 29% 27% 47% 45% 51% 50% 70% 68% 37%

Qualitative Evalutation metric 2.8 3.32 2.46 3.26 2.62 2.14 3.18 2.82 3.64 3.68 2.68 2.36 2.94 2.38 1.98 3.12 2.54 2.32 2.86 3 2.82 2.64 2.6 2.24 3.1 2.92 2.46 2 3.06 2.68 3.1 2.51 2.9 3 2.88 2.74 2.92 2.8 2.71 2.6 2.64 3.1 2.2 2.4

Principal Percentile Satisfaction rank metric 47% 0.767 89% 0.719 21% 0.783 86% 0.738 33% 0.812 4% 0.689 82% 0.625 51% 0.674 98% 0.713 100% 0.896 42% 0.792 12% 0.833 67% 0.724 16% 0.751 0% 0.736 81% 0.765 28% 0.633 11% 0.740 54% 0.643 70% 0.687 51% 0.760 35% 0.699 30% 0.800 7% 0.769 77% 0.707 65% 0.745 21% 0.648 2% 0.713 74% 0.777 40% 0.722 75% 0.794 26% 0.824 60% 0.624 70% 0.746 58% 0.785 46% 0.689 63% 0.722 47% 0.876 44% 0.826 30% 0.737 35% 0.748 77% 0.644 5% 0.546 18% 0.735

78% 74% 64% 28% 48% 85% 18% 50% 98% 0% 64% 66% 57% 66%

3.6 2.26 2.96 2.865 2.66 3.2 2.9 3.32 3.335 2.36 2.46 3.38 2.44 3.49

96% 9% 68% 56% 39% 84% 60% 88% 91% 12% 21% 93% 19% 95%

0.789 0.711 0.838 0.865 0.714 0.834 0.637 0.717 0.947 0.707 0.620 0.751 0.795 0.888

School BN M015 M019 M020 M034 M063 M064 M110 M134 M137 M140 M142 M184 M188 M301 M315 M332 M345 M361 M363 M364 M378 M448 M450 M458 M509 M515 M539 M650 M696 M839 M001 M002 M003 M006 M011 M033 M040 M041 M042 M047 M051 M059 M077 M089

Network N203 N406 N203 N206 N206 N406 N406 N206 N203 N406 N203 N561 N406 N101 N102 N103 N103 N206 N102 N102 N308 N308 N101 N108 N206 N108 N201 N108 N107 N101 N206 N206 N206 N103 N206 N203 N103 N203 N203 N403 N203 N203 N103 N103

Network Leader Feigelson, Daniel Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra Feigelson, Daniel Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Feigelson, Daniel Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra Feigelson, Daniel Smith, Derek Jimenez, Cristina/Litrico, Sandra Cofield, Marina Cassidy, Joseph/Sheehan, Alison Chu, Yuet Chu, Yuet Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Cassidy, Joseph/Sheehan, Alison Cassidy, Joseph/Sheehan, Alison Pelles, Kathy Pelles, Kathy Cofield, Marina Kaufhold, Sumita Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Kaufhold, Sumita Beirne, Gerard Kaufhold, Sumita Scala, Nancy Cofield, Marina Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Chu, Yuet Cordova, Ada/Godlewski, Jayne Feigelson, Daniel Chu, Yuet Feigelson, Daniel Feigelson, Daniel Bradbury, Marisol Feigelson, Daniel Feigelson, Daniel Chu, Yuet Chu, Yuet

Peer Index percentile 81% 39% 55% 99% 61% 68% 29% 48% 57% 79% 80% 11% 89% 95% 21% 99% 61% 19% 17% 17% 67% 62% 65% 22% 85% 4% 3% 13% 2% 40% 29% 30% 6% 1% 18% 35% 3% 1% 22% 97% 37% 5% 0% 1%

PR percentile 12.42 60.91 59.73 36.60 61.91 10.40 34.23 25.84 2.35 8.50 15.10 99.35 79.74 53.76 34.56 35.38 40.39 43.62 12.42 19.80 69.08 35.65 85.07 27.49 92.11 83.94 76.32 40.79 64.35 46.14 98.66 16.78 84.23 76.17 72.32 81.38 79.53 97.32 25.98 69.63 87.92 97.32 45.13

QR Year 2010 2010 2009 2011 2011 2011 2011 2010 2011 2011 2008 2008 2011 2010 2011 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2008 2010 2008 2011 2008 2010 2009 2010 2008 2011 2011 2008 2008 2011 2011 2008 2010 2011 2009 2009 2011

M104 M111 M114 M116 M124 M126 M130 M131 M150 M151 M158 M167 M183 M198 M212 M217 M225 M234 M255 M260 M267 M276 M288 M289 M290 M294 M296 M298 M300 M303 M305 M308 M312 M313 M316 M347 M374 M376 M392 M393 M394 M397 M399 M400 M407 M408 M411

N101 N203 N101 N203 N206 N102 N103 N103 N103 N103 N103 N101 N103 N203 N203 N103 N102 N203 N101 N101 N206 N203 N405 N101 N203 N102 N405 N103 N105 N403 N105 N107 N107 N102 N105 N403 N405 N107 N4...

Recommended

View more >