31
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 10 Chapter 10 The Criminal The Criminal Trial Trial

Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

  • Upload
    peony

  • View
    51

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial. Learning Outcomes. LO1: Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal defendants in the United States. LO2: Explain what “taking the fifth” really means. LO3: Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory challenges during voir dire. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

CJ

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Chapter 10Chapter 10

The Criminal TrialThe Criminal Trial

Page 2: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcomes

LO1: Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal defendants in the United States.

LO2: Explain what “taking the fifth” really means.

LO3: Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory challenges during voir dire.

LO4: List the standard steps in a criminal jury trial.

LO5: List the six basic steps of an appeal.

Page 3: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

1LO

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal defendants in

the United States.

Page 4: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 1

Speedy Trial:• Required by the Sixth amendment• Barker v. Wingo (1972)• All 50 states have their own speedy-

trial statutes

Page 5: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 1

Statutes of Limitations• Legislative time limits that require

prosecutors to charge a defendant within a certain amount of time.

• Prosecutions that carry death penalty do not have a statute of limitations.

Page 6: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 1

The Role of the Jury• Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)

– Defendant is entitled to jury trial in all felony cases

• In most criminal cases, jury verdict must be unanimous.

Page 7: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

2LO

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Explain what “taking the Fifth” really means.

Page 8: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 2The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination:• Provided for in the Fifth amendment• No person “shall be compelled in any

criminal case to be a witness against himself”

• Witnesses are often granted immunity• Adamson v. California (1947)

– The decision to “take the fifth” should not prejudice the jury

Page 9: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 2

• Defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty

• The standard of proof in criminal court is beyond a reasonable doubt.

Page 10: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

3LO

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory challenges during voir

dire.

Page 11: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 3Jurors must be:• A United States citizen• Over 18 years of age• Free of felony convictions• Of the necessary good health to serve• Sufficiently intelligent to understand the

issues in the trial• Able to read, write and comprehend

English

Page 12: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 3

• Jurors are selected from a master jury list• venire

– All the people who are notified that they have been selected for jury duty.

• voir dire– Process in which attorneys can question

prospective jurors

Page 13: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 3There are two ways jurors are excluded:• Challenges for Cause

– The attorney must provide a sound, legally justifiable reason why a juror cannot serve

• Peremptory Challenges– Based solely on an attorney’s

subjective reasoning

Page 14: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 3

Race in jury selection– For many years, attorneys used

peremptory challenges to segregate – The Batson Reversal (Batson v.

Kentucky)• Prohibited prosecutors from using race as

basis to exclude jurors

Page 15: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 3

Women on the Jury– J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994)

• Extended Batson ruling to cover gender bias

Page 16: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

4LO

© 2011 Cengage Learning

List the standard steps in a criminal jury trial.

Page 17: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4

Opening Statements:• The first step of the trial process.• A “road map” that describes what

the attorney will try to show

Page 18: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4

Evidence• Testimonial Evidence

– Statements by competent witnesses– Lay vs. expert witness– Direct vs. circumstantial evidence– Relevance– Prejudicial evidence

Page 19: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4

• Real Evidence– Presented to the court in the form of

exhibits, includes any physical items.

Page 20: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4

The Prosecution’s Case:• The burden of proof is on the state.• Attempts to establish corpus delicti.

• Direct examination of witnesses

Page 21: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4Cross-Examination• Questioning of an opposing witness• Sixth Amendment and the

Confrontation Clause• Allows attorneys to test truthfulness of

opposing witnesses, and create doubt in jury.

Page 22: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4

The Defendant’s Case• Defendant is not required to present a

case at all• Most defenses try to expose

weaknesses in prosecutor’s case to create reasonable doubt.

Page 23: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4The Defendant’s Case• Other defense strategies

– Alibi defense– Affirmative defense

• Self-defense• Insanity• Duress• Entrapment

Page 24: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4

• Rebuttal and Surrebuttal• Closing arguments• Jury instructions (charging the jury)• Deliberation

– Sequestering

• The Verdict– Hung juries– The Allen Charge– Jury nullification

Page 25: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

CAREERPREPJury Consultant

Job Description:• Pretrial: Research jurors’ backgrounds, assist with juror selection,

create favorable potential juror profiles, develop voir dire questions, and organize mock trials to aid trial attorneys.

• During trial: Carefully watch jurors’ body language and behavior to determine if the client trial lawyer is communicating her or his arguments successfully, coach witnesses, and help trial lawyers develop strategies.

What Kind of Training Is Required?• Minimum of a bachelor’s degree (although a master’s degree or a

Ph.D. is ideal) in sociology, political science, criminology, psychology, or behavioral science. Research and data analysis skills are also crucial for this profession.

• A strongly developed intuition. Jury consultants are not hired for their expertise in criminal law, but for their insight into human behavior, decision making, and motivational patterns.

Annual Salary Range?$40,000–$100,000

For additional information, visit: www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-jury-consultant.htm.

Page 26: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 4Appeals:• The defendant can appeal only if they show

the trial court acted improperly on a question of law.

• Only the defense can appeal. The prosecution is limited by double jeopardy.

• Double jeopardy does not preclude the victim from bringing a civil suit, or prevent the defendant from being charged in federal court.

• A hung jury does not preclude a retrial.

Page 27: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

5LO

© 2011 Cengage Learning

List the six basic steps of an appeal.

Page 28: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 5Appeals:• The two basic reasons for an appeal are

to:– Correct an error made in the trial– Review policy

• During the appeals process the defendant is no longer presumed innocent

Page 29: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

Learning Outcome 5Habeas Corpus• A judicial order that commands a

corrections official to bring a prisoner before a federal court so that the court can hear the convict’s claim that he or she is being held illegally.

Page 30: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

The Steps of an Appeal

• Within a specific period of time—usually between thirty and ninety days—the defendant must file a notice of appeal. This is a short written statement outlining the basis of the appeal.

• The appellant, or losing party in the lower court, must then transfer the trial court record to the appellate court. This record contains items of the case file, including exhibits, and a transcript of the testimony.

• Next, the briefs must be filed by both parties. A brief is a written argument that presents the party’s legal arguments and precedents to support these arguments.

Page 31: Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial

© 2011 Cengage Learning

The Steps of an Appeal

• The briefs are followed by oral arguments, in which attorneys from both sides appear before the appellate court panel to state their positions.

• After the oral arguments, the judges retire to deliberate the case. After a decision has been made, one or more of the judges prepare the written opinion.(This process was described in Chapter 8 in more detail.)

• Finally, the court holds a disposition in which it announces the next step for the case. The court can uphold the decision of the lower court, or it can modify the lower court decision by changing a part of it but not the whole. The lower court’s decision may be reversed, or set aside, or the appellate court can reverse and remand the case, meaning that the lower court’s decision is overturned and the matter is sent back for further proceedings.