chap11 (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    1/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Quality

    P

    erformance

    objectives

    Dependability

    Development

    and Organization(Operations developmentand improvement)

    Speed

    Flexibility

    Cost

    Resource Usage

    Market

    Competitiveness

    Decision areas

    Issues covered in this chapter

    Capacity SupplyNetwork

    ProcessTechnology

    Issues include: Organizational structure and

    operations effectiveness

    Performance measurementused for setting thedirection of improvements

    Benchmarking againstother operators

    Prioritising improvements Learning and enhancing

    process knowledgethrough control

    Expectations on, andcontributions from, theoperations function

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    2/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Market

    potential

    Intended

    market

    position

    Market

    strategy

    Operations

    capabilities

    Operations

    resources and

    processes

    Operations Resources Market Requirements

    The Direct, Develop, Deploy strategic improvement cycle

    DEVELOP operations

    capabilities through

    learning

    DEPLOY operations

    contribution

    DIRECT performanceand prioritization

    The StrategicOperations

    Improvement

    Cycle

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    3/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Continuous improvement at a strategic level

    Market RequirementsOperations Resources

    Intended

    competitive

    position in the

    market place

    DEPLOY operations

    contribution by exploiting

    superior capabilitiesPotential

    competitive

    position in the

    market place

    MARKET

    STRATEGY

    DEVELOP

    operations

    capabilities

    through learning

    The operations

    capabilities

    and

    performance

    Getting the fit

    right

    The

    operations

    resources and

    processes

    DIRECT performance

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    4/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    DIRECT getting the fit right

    Fit means that the operations resources and processes are

    aligned with the requirements of its markets.

    Marketr

    equirements

    Operations resource capability

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    5/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Intended market

    position

    Operations

    resources and

    processes

    Targets

    Performance

    DIRECT

    Directing improvement is a cycle of comparing targets

    with performance

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    6/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Customer

    Satisfaction

    Productivity

    Quality

    Dependability

    Speed

    Flexibility

    Cost

    Agility

    Market

    Objectives

    Financial

    Objectives

    OverallStrategy

    Detailed

    performance

    targets

    Increasing aggregation

    Increasing strategic relevance

    Increasing diagnostic power

    Increasing frequency of measurement

    Performance targets can involve different

    levels of aggregation

    Intended

    marketposition

    Operations

    resources

    andprocesses

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    7/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    40

    50

    6070

    80

    90

    100

    X XX

    X

    X

    X

    Time

    Last years averageperformance = 60%

    Actual performance = 83%

    Performance by historical standards is GOOD

    Different standards of comparison

    give different messages

    4050

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    X XX

    X

    X

    X

    Time

    Last years averageperformance = 60%

    Actual performance = 83%

    Performance by historical standards is GOODPerformance against improvement goal is POOR

    Improvement goal = 95%

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    8/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    40

    50

    6070

    80

    90

    100

    X XX

    X

    X

    X

    Time

    Last years averageperformance = 60%

    Actual performance = 83%

    Performance by historical standards is GOODPerformance against improvement goal is POORPerformance against competitors is GOOD

    Different standards of comparison

    give different messages

    4050

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    X XX

    X

    X

    X

    Time

    Last years averageperformance = 60%

    Actual performance = 83%

    Performance by historical standards is GOODPerformance against improvement goal is POORPerformance against competitors is GOODAbsolute performance is POOR

    Improvement goal = 95%

    Improvement goal = 95%

    Competitor performance = 75%

    Competitor performance = 75%

    Absolute performance = 100%

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    9/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    123456789

    Importance for customersLOW HIGH

    Perform

    anceagainst

    competitors

    GOOD

    BAD

    URGENT

    ACTION

    IMPROVE

    APPROPRIATE

    EXCESS?

    F

    E

    A

    C

    D

    B

    The importance-performance matrix

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    10/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    123456789

    Importance for customersLOW HIGH

    Perform

    anceagainst

    competitors

    GOOD

    BAD

    The importance-performance matrix for TAGs

    overnight temperature-controlled service

    X

    X X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    XVolume

    flexibility

    Delivery

    Dropquote

    Windowquote

    Distributionquality

    Documentationservice

    Deliveryflexibility

    Enquirylead-time

    Order/dispatchquality

    Price/Cost

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    11/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Cost

    Flexibility

    Speed

    Dependability

    Quality

    Quality + dependability

    Quality

    Quality + dependability + speed

    Quality + dependability + speed + flexibilityQuality + dependability + speed + flexibility + cost

    The sandcone model of improvement; cost reduction relies on a cumulative

    foundation of improvement in the other performance objectives

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    12/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Key Indicators

    All staff are able to explain the operations

    strategic objectives

    Individuals and groups use the strategic

    objectives to focus improvement activity

    All proposed changes are assessed against

    strategic objectives

    All improvement is monitored and measured

    against strategic objectives

    DIRECT getting the fit right

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    13/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    DEV

    ELOP

    Kno

    wledge

    Control

    Operations

    capabilities

    Operations

    resources and

    processes

    Developing operations capabilities is encouraged by a cycle

    of attempting to control processes which enhances process

    knowledge which, in turn, makes control easier

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    14/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    It isnt just a matter of being given the

    right resources

    Operations with the same resources will

    not all give the same performance

    So what makes the difference?

    How they are able to learn

    DEVELOP through learning

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    15/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Processperforma

    ncevariable

    Upper bound of acceptability

    Upper bound of variation

    Lower bound of variation

    Lower bound of acceptability

    TIME

    A process performance chart

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    16/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Processperforma

    ncevariable

    Upper bound of acceptability

    Upper control limit

    Lower control limit

    Lower bound of acceptability

    TIME

    A statistical process control chart

    Distribution of normalvariation in process

    performance

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    17/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Lower control limits

    Upper control limits

    TIME TIME

    Low process variation allows changes in process

    performance to be readily detected

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    18/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Systematic learning

    You cant learn about a process when its out

    of control

    If things are in control

    you notice changes

    so you can investigate them

    so you can identify root causes

    so you can put things right

    and improve the process

    and learn more about it

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    19/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    ProcessControl

    Learning

    Process

    Knowledge

    Process control starts the learning which develops

    process knowledge

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    20/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Knowledge is power

    1 Complete ignorance Nowhere

    2 Awareness Tacit

    3 Measurement Written

    4 Control of mean Written and in hardware

    5 Process capability Hardware and operating manual

    6 Process characterization Empirical equations

    7 Know why Scientific models

    8 Complete knowledge

    None

    Full

    Stage Term Knowledge Typical form of knowledge

    DEVELOP through learning

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    21/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    DEV

    ELOP

    Knowledge

    Co

    ntrol

    Operationscapabilities

    Operations

    resources and

    processes

    Understanding

    process limits

    Better products

    and services

    Wide

    product/service

    range

    Less costly

    flexibility

    Enhanced

    quality

    Customer

    loyalty

    Retain best

    staff

    Staff job

    satisfaction

    Understanding of

    process inputs

    Higher process

    efficiency

    Enhanced supplier

    relationships

    Lower

    costs

    Process control may be one of the most operational of

    tasks, but it can bring strategic benefit

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    22/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Building on learning

    Key Indicators

    Learning is made explicit, What have you

    learned at work today?

    Individuals and groups share their learning

    Individuals seek out opportunities to actively

    learn and experiment

    Learning is captured and debated

    Designated individuals are responsible for

    learning from other operations

    Process knowledge is seen as a key operationsobjective

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    23/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    DEPLOY the contribution and role of

    OperationsIn everyday life we all switch roles

    How we see our role shapes how we

    behave and interact with others

    So critical to success operations strategy is

    changing how operations management see

    themselves and are seen by others

    The key issues is What should we expect from

    operations management?

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    24/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    DEPLOY

    Contribution

    Expectations

    Market

    potentialOperations

    capabilities

    Deploying operations capabilities to create market

    potential means ensuring that the operations function isexpected to contribute to market positioning

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    25/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Link strategy

    with

    operations

    Give an

    operations

    advantage

    Externallysupportive

    Adopt

    best

    practice

    Correct the

    worstproblems

    Internally

    supportive

    Externally

    neutral

    Internally

    neutral

    STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 4

    Stop holding

    the

    organization

    back

    Be as good

    as

    competitors

    Be clearly

    the best in

    the

    industry

    Redefine the

    industrys

    expectations

    Challenges

    for

    operations

    Operations

    are expected

    to be .

    Hays and Wheelwrights 4-stage model

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    26/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Correct the

    Worst

    Problems

    Internally

    neutral

    The role of operations can be defined by its aspirations

    STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 4

    Stop holding

    the

    organization

    back

    Adopt best

    Practice

    Externally

    neutral

    Be as goodas

    competitors

    Theability

    toImplementstrategy

    Link Strategy

    With

    Operations

    Internally

    supportive

    Be clearly

    the best in

    the

    industry

    Theability

    toSupportstrategy

    Give an

    OperationsAdvantage

    Externally

    supportive

    Redefine the

    industrysexpectations

    Theability

    toDrive

    strategy

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    27/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    Contribution and Role

    Key Indicators

    Staff cooperate and contribute in areas other

    than their own

    Staff understand their role in the internal and

    external supply chain

    The concept of internal supplier development is

    established

    Staff have visited and talked with their internal

    and external customers

    Staff are capable of making a contribution two

    organizational levels above their own

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    28/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Staffattitude Knowledge

    of staff

    Getting to

    right person

    Time toresolution

    Kept informed

    Completeness

    Staff understanding

    LOW HIGHIMPORTANCEBAD

    GOOD

    PERFOR

    MANCE

    Importance-performance matrix for the New Jersey survey

    Slide 11.17

  • 8/3/2019 chap11 (1)

    29/29

    Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003

    0.1

    1.0

    0.01

    1000 100000 100000 1000000 10000000

    Cumulative volume of calls processed

    Log-log experience curve for KPG Atlanta call center

    Associatehourspercall

    10.0

    Slide 11.18