Upload
priambodo-ariewibowo
View
22
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
aa
Citation preview
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Manufacturing Planning and Control
MPC 6th Edition
Chapter 4
4-2
Sales and Operations Planning
The Sales and Operations Planning (SOP) process is used to develop an overall business plan to integrate the functional planning efforts within the company. SOP links strategic goals to production and coordinates the planning efforts of various groups such as marketing, finance, operations, and human resources.
SOP is top management’s handle on the business.
4-3
Agenda
4-4
SOP Functions SOP provides the key communication links for
top management to coordinate the various planning activities in a business
Strategic Planning
Marketing Planning
Resource Planning
Financial Planning
Demand Management
Rough-Cut Capacity Planning
Sales & Operations Planning (Volume)
Sales Plan Operations Plan
Master Production Scheduling (Mix)
Front End
MPC Boundary
4-5
SOP Fundamentals
The role of SOP is to balance supply and demand at the volume level
Balance between supply and demand
4-6
SOP Communication
The plan must be expressed in terms that are meaningful to non-manufacturing executives
The operations portion of the plan must be stated in terms that MPC functions can useAggregate units by product line, dollar
value, etc.
4-7
Value of SOP
The SOP process provides visibility of the interactions between sales, marketing, production, and finance
Critical trade-off decisions are documented Manufacturing performance is controlled in a
clear fashion This leads to better integration among
functional areas and better response to the marketplace
4-8
SOP Process
End of month
Statistical forecastsField sales worksheets
Management forecastFirst-pass spreadsheets
Recommendations and agenda
Capacity constraintsSecond-pass spreadsheets
Decisions and game plan
4-9
SOP Process – Key Activities
Updating the sales forecast Reviewing the impact of operations plan
changes–can current capacity and materials support the changes?
Identifying alternatives where problems exist Formulating recommendations for top
management Communicating the information to top
management
4-10
SOP Discipline
For the SOP process to be routine and effective, replanning must occur when conditions indicate the need
Mechanisms for maintaining support for the plans are importantSenior executive involvement is a
minimum requirement
4-11
Communicating SOP Information–Displays
Information can be conveyed in several waysCharts (monthly forecast, cumulative
production, alternative plans)Tabular displays (easily captured and
communicated using spreadsheets)
4-12
SOP Tabular DisplayA planning factor is used to convert sales $ to units
The display includes both history and the plan
Using a chase strategy can lead to large variations in planned production
Planning assumptions are clearly displayed
Financial results of the plan are calculated and displayed
4-13
Production Strategies
Chase–production output is changed to match sales quantities
Level–production is constant, resulting in inventory build-up and depletion over time
Mixed–combination of chase and level designed to result in acceptable levels of flexibility and inventory
4-14
Chase Strategy
A spreadsheet with these calculations can be found here.
4-15
Chase Strategy
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Demand forecast
Chase
4-16
Level Strategy
A spreadsheet with these calculations can be found here.
4-17
Level Strategy
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Demand forecast
Level
4-18
Karma strateji (Mixed Strategy)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Demand forecast
mixed
4-19
Example: Chase Strategy
4-20
Example: Level Strategy
4-21
Example: Mixed Strategy
4-22
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 1
Table 13.2
Month Expected DemandProduction
DaysDemand Per Day
(computed)
Jan 900 22 41
Feb 700 18 39
Mar 800 21 38
Apr 1,200 21 57
May 1,500 22 68
June 1,100 20 55
6,200 124
= = 50 units per day6,200
124
Average requirement =
Total expected demand
Number of production days
4-23
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 1
Figure 13.3
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number ofworking days
Pro
du
ctio
n r
ate
per
wo
rkin
g d
ay
Level production using average monthly forecast demand
Forecast demand
4-24
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
Plan 1 – constant workforce
4-25
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
Plan 1 – constant workforce
MonthProduction
Days
Production at 50 Units
per DayDemand Forecast
Monthly Inventory Change
Ending Inventory
Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200
Feb 18 900 700 +200 400
Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650
Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500
May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100
June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0
1,850
Total units of inventory carried over from onemonth to the next = 1,850 units
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
4-26
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
Plan 1 – constant workforce
MonthProduction
Days
Production at 50 Units
per DayDemand Forecast
Monthly Inventory Change
Ending Inventory
Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200
Feb 18 900 700 +200 400
Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650
Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500
May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100
June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0
1,850
Total units of inventory carried over from onemonth to the next = 1,850 units
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
Costs Calculations
Inventory carrying $9,250 (= 1,850 units carried x $5 per unit)
Regular-time labor 99,200 (= 10 workers x $80 per day x 124 days)
Other costs (overtime, hiring, layoffs, subcontracting) 0
Total cost $108,450
4-27
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Figure 13.4
Cu
mu
lati
ve d
eman
d u
nit
s7,000 –
6,000 –
5,000 –
4,000 –
3,000 –
2,000 –
1,000 –
–Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Cumulative forecast requirements
Cumulative level production using average monthly
forecast requirements
Reduction of inventory
Excess inventory
6,200 units
4-28
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
Table 13.2
Month Expected DemandProduction
DaysDemand Per Day
(computed)
Jan 900 22 41
Feb 700 18 39
Mar 800 21 38
Apr 1,200 21 57
May 1,500 22 68
June 1,100 20 55
6,200 124
Minimum requirement = 38 units per day
Plan 2 – subcontracting
4-29
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number ofworking days
Pro
du
ctio
n r
ate
per
wo
rkin
g d
ay
Level production using lowest
monthly forecast demand
Forecast demand
4-30
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
4-31
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit
Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)
Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
In-house production = 38 units per day x 124 days
= 4,712 units
Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712= 1,488 units
4-32
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit
Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)
Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
Roofing Supplier Example 3
In-house production = 38 units per day x 124 days
= 4,712 units
Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712= 1,488 units
Costs Calculations
Regular-time labor $75,392 (= 7.6 workers x $80 per day x 124 days)
Subcontracting 29,760 (= 1,488 units x $20 per unit)
Total cost $105,152
4-33
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
Table 13.2
Month Expected DemandProduction
DaysDemand Per Day
(computed)
Jan 900 22 41
Feb 700 18 39
Mar 800 21 38
Apr 1,200 21 57
May 1,500 22 68
June 1,100 20 55
6,200 124
Production = Expected Demand
Plan 3 – hiring and layoffs
4-34
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number ofworking days
Pro
du
ctio
n r
ate
per
wo
rkin
g d
ay Forecast demand and monthly production
4-35
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)
$600 per unit
4-36
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
Table 13.3Table 13.3
Cost InformationCost Information
Inventory carrying costInventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month$ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unitSubcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit$10 per unit
Average pay rateAverage pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)$ 5 per hour ($40 per day)
Overtime pay rateOvertime pay rate $ 7 per hour $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day)(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unitLabor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)(hiring and training)
$300 per unit$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)(layoffs)
$600 per unit$600 per unit
MonthMonthForecast Forecast
(units)(units)
Daily Daily Prod Prod RateRate
Basic Basic Production Production
Cost Cost (demand x (demand x
1.6 hrs/unit x 1.6 hrs/unit x $10/hr)$10/hr)
Extra Cost of Extra Cost of Increasing Increasing Production Production (hiring cost)(hiring cost)
Extra Cost of Extra Cost of Decreasing Decreasing Production Production (layoff cost)(layoff cost) Total CostTotal Cost
JanJan 900900 4141 $ 14,400$ 14,400 —— —— $ 14,400$ 14,400
FebFeb 700700 3939 11,20011,200 —— $1,200 $1,200 (= 2 x $600)(= 2 x $600) 12,40012,400
MarMar 800800 3838 12,80012,800 —— $600 $600 (= 1 x $600)(= 1 x $600) 13,40013,400
AprApr 1,2001,200 5757 19,20019,200 $5,700 $5,700 (= 19 x $300)(= 19 x $300) —— 24,90024,900
MayMay 1,5001,500 6868 24,00024,000 $3,300 $3,300 (= 11 x $300)(= 11 x $300) —— 24,30024,300
JuneJune 1,1001,100 5555 17,60017,600 —— $7,800 $7,800 (= 13 x $600)(= 13 x $600) 25,40025,400
$99,200$99,200 $9,000$9,000 $9,600$9,600 $117,800$117,800
Table 13.4Table 13.4
4-37
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Three Plans
Table 13.5
Cost Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3
Inventory carrying $ 9,250 $ 0 $ 0
Regular labor 99,200 75,392 99,200
Overtime labor 0 0 0
Hiring 0 0 9,000
Layoffs 0 0 9,600
Subcontracting 0 29,760 0
Total cost $108,450 $105,152 $117,800
Plan 2 is the lowest cost option
4-38
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mathematical Approaches Useful for generating strategies
Transportation Method of Linear Programming
Produces an optimal plan
Management Coefficients Model Model built around manager’s experience and
performance
Other Models Linear Decision Rule
Simulation
4-39
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Management Coefficients Model
Builds a model based on manager’s experience and performance
A regression model is constructed to define the relationships between decision variables
Objective is to remove inconsistencies in decision making
4-40
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Other Models
Linear Decision Rule
Minimizes costs using quadratic cost curves
Operates over a particular time period
Simulation
Uses a search procedure to try different combinations of variables
Develops feasible but not necessarily optimal solutions
4-41
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Summary of Aggregate Planning Methods
TechniquesSolution
Approaches Important Aspects
Graphicalmethods
Trial and error
Simple to understand and easy to use. Many solutions; one chosen may not be optimal.
Transportation method of linear programming
Optimization LP software available; permits sensitivity analysis and new constraints; linear functions may not be realistic.
Table 13.8
4-42
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Summary of Aggregate Planning Methods
TechniquesSolution
Approaches Important Aspects
Management coefficients model
Heuristic Simple, easy to implement; tries to mimic manager’s decision process; uses regression.
Simulation Change parameters
Complex; may be difficult to build and for managers to understand.
Table 13.8
4-43
Management Obligations
Commit to the SOP processEstablish the SOP frameworkPut the right team togetherSet meetingsParticipate in the process
Modify performance measures and reward structures to align with the plan
Force resolution of trade-offs between functions Lead the cultural change
4-44
Functional Roles
The primary obligation for all functions involved is to “hit the plan”
A cross-functional team approach is important Executive champion/sponsor–keep top management focused on the process,
clear major obstacles, and acquire resources SOP process owner–provide leadership for the SOP process and implementation Demand planning team–provide demand data and represent forecasting,
marketing, and sales functions Supply planning team–provide supply system information and represent
manufacturing and purchasing functions Pre-SOP team–manage cross-functional development of SOP Executive SOP team–upper management representative of each functional area
4-45
Defining Product Families
4-46
Integrated Planning
Integration among sales, marketing, and production is key Sales and marketing need to sell what is planned
(overselling is just as bad as underselling)• Opportunities need to be evaluated via changes to the SOP
Manufacturing’s job is to achieve the plan–exactly (overproduction and underproduction are equally bad)
The end result is good customer service Breakdowns in the plan must be quickly reported by the
functional area responsible
4-47
Strategic Planning
A direction-setting activityCan be an extension of budgetingMore recently, plan is based on
products and markets rather than organizational units
SOP must support strategic plans
4-48
Operations Plan Control
The SOP process should be widely understood Planned results for each functional area should be
clearly communicatedThe seriousness of the plan must also be reinforced
Key issuesWhen and how to change the plan?How stable should the plan be from period to
period?
4-49
Principles
The operations plan isn’t a forecast. It is a statement of desired production output.
The operations plan is included in the SOP process to maintain agreement with other functional plans.
Trade-offs required to frame the operations plan must be made prior to final approval
Top management involvement is imperative in the SOP process. The SOP process should relate directly to the strategic plan.
4-50
Principles The MPC system should be used to
perform routine activities and provide routine data, allowing management time to be devoted to important tasks.
The MPC system should facilitate what-if analysis at the SOP level.
Reviews of performance against SOP are needed to prompt replanning when necessary.
4-51
Quiz–Chapter 4 The four fundamental issues in Sales and Operations Planning
are __________. Sales and Operations Planning balances supply and demand at
the ______ level. Many key Sales and Operations Planning linkages are outside the
Manufacturing Planning and Control (MPC) system. (True/False) A strategy which matches monthly supply to forecasted demand is
________. A strategy which maintains a consistent monthly output is
_________. The primary obligation for any functional area is to “hit the plan.”
(True/False)