Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
COURSE PACK Professor David Serlin University of California, San Diego Summer 2008 affect archaeology audio becoming cinema close clusters communication difference discussion dissolve ecstasy emotion energetic energy entertainment evocation experiment experimental freedom image inductive interaction intervention movement multiplication participation perception performance psst re-animation restroom sex sociology surprise technology terrorism time trail transportation trust value
Citation preview
CGS 100 ___________________________________________________________
Conceptualizing Gender: Theories and Methods COURSE PACK Professor David Serlin University of California, San Diego Summer 2008
CGS 100 Conceptualizing Gender: Theories and Methods
Professor David Serlin University of California, San Diego
Summer 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.) Emily Martin, “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles.” Signs 16(3): 1991, 485-501. 2.) Londa Schienbinger, “Why Mammals Are Called Mammals.” Nature’s Body: Gender and the Making of Modern Science. Beacon: 1993. pp. 40-74. 3.) Gail Bederman, “Remaking Manhood Through ‘Race’ and Civilization.” Manliness and Civilization. University of Chicago Press: 1995, pp. 1-44. 4.) Dolores Hayden, “What Would a Non-Sexist City Be Like? Speculations on Housing, Urban Design, and Human Work.” in Rendell et al, eds., Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Routledge: 2000, pp. 266-281 5.) Karen Franck, “A Feminist Approach to Architecture: Acknowledging Women’s Ways of Knowing.” in Rendell et al eds., Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Routledge: 2000, pp. 295-305. 6.) Henry Urbach, “Closets, Clothes, Disclosure.” in Rendell et al eds., Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Routledge: 2000, pp. 342-352. 7.) Catharine Lumby, “The President’s Penis: Entertaining Sex and Power.” in Lauren Berlant and Lisa
Duggan, eds., Our Monica Ourselves: The Clinton Affair and the National Interest. New York University Press: 2001, pp. 225-236. 8.) Samantha King, “Stamping Out Breast Cancer: The Neoliberal State and the Volunteer Citizen.” Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy. University of Minnesota Press:
Page
1
19
37
61
77
89
101
109
119
135
149
2006, pp. 61-79. 9.) Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” in Bonnie G. Smith and Beth Hutchinson, eds., Gendering Disability. Rutgers University Press: 2004, pp. 73-103. 10.) Ellen Feder, “Doctor’s Orders: Parents and Intersexed Children.” in Eva Feder Kittay and Ellen Feder, eds., The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency. Rowman & Littlefield: 2002, pp. 294-319. 11.) Eva Feder Kittay, “Policy and a Public Ethic of Care.” Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. Routledge: 1999, pp. 117-146.
*Permission to reprint all selections granted by the publisher
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
