14
Advance Material and Manufacturing Technologies By Shobin John 05/21/2022 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected] 1 CASE1:Material Selection

ces edupack material selection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

1

Advance Material and Manufacturing Technologies

ByShobin John

CASE1:Material Selection

Page 2: ces edupack material selection

MATERIAL WORLD The material world serves a

huge list of functions. The evolution was faster and the

range of properties more varied. The birth of materials is dated

back to the birth of the first invention , though it existed even before

New materials were invented with time and its applications varied

From wheel to the ultra modern Nano-technology instruments – material is vital

Ashby’s chart depicts the material invention and its usage over the years

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

2

Page 3: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

3

CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIAL WORLD

• Classifying materials is vital for the ease of identification in practical applications

• Periodic table was one great invention but not good enough as it does not include the whole list of engineering materials

• Ashby’s classification of materials can overcome this drawback and is as depicted in the picture

Page 4: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

4

SELECTION OF MATERIALS• The task of material selection can be simplified by its ordered classification into

kingdom, family, class, subclass, member and attributes (Ashby’s selection method)• This can be used to arrive at a point specific from a diverse wide• An example is as depicted in the diagram

Page 5: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

5

SELECTION TECHNIQUE and its structure

• The myriad number of materials and its diverse properties, makes material selection process peccable

• CES EduPack is a software to overcome this dilemma• It helps to identify the apt material from the material classification

world. The structure of the software is as shown in the second figure

Page 6: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

6

CES SOFTWARE AND TYPES OF CHARTS

• CES software makes the material selection process less tedious• A huge list of material properties and its applications are included in its

database• Chart is the main tool used in this software for screening the choices• It can be done making use of either the bubble chart or the bar chart as

depicted• Comparison of the selected materials can be made through the graph based

on the desired characteristics

TransparencyOptical Quality

Max

imum

serv

ice

tem

pera

ture

(°C)

300

400

500

600

700

800

Page 7: ces edupack material selection

MATERIAL SELECTION FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

DISC CLUTCHProject involves flywheel installed

on bicycle and is named as Flywheel on bicycle.

System requires a component clutch which is used to adjust the gear and flywheel.

The engagement and disengagement for changing gear and flywheel is the function of clutch

Importance was low to moderate as identified in the QFD

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

7

Page 8: ces edupack material selection

IDENTIFYING ATTRIBUTESPrimary feature being machinability and

possessing high hardness.Price factor has to be low due to the

relatively low importance shown from the QFD analysis

Aesthetically high will add valueHeat carrying capacity has to be

moderately high to overcome friction and heat generation.

Chemical inertness and recyclability can help in improving environmental aspects

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

8

Page 9: ces edupack material selection

RANKING ATTRIBUTES AND GRAPH SELECTION

SL NO ATTRIBUTES1 MACHINABILITY2 PRICE3 SPECIFIC HEAT

CAPACITY4 RECYCLABILITY5 ELECTRICAL PROP6 TENSILE STRENGTH7 HARDNESS

RANK ATTRIBUTES1 MACHINABILITY2 SPECIFIC HEAT CAPACITY3 PRICE4 HARDNESS5 RECYCLABILITY6 TENSILE STRNGTH7 ELECTRICAL PROP

Attribute ranking shows that the material has to be identified on

the properties of hardness, specific heat capacity, machinability and price

Following graphs are selected for material selection• Hardness vs. Specific heat• Price vs. Specific heat• Machinability vs Price

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

9

Page 10: ces edupack material selection

Hardness vs. specific heat capacity

this graph is used for the primary screening of material as identified from the attribute ranking

the desired category is identified as the Hardness section the materials have higher specific heat and hardness of the graph

is assumed to serve the purpose and compared against the other graphs as identified

Aluminum alloy, high carbon steel and aluminum/silicon carbide composite are chosen to start with

Hardness - Vickers (HV)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Spec

ific

heat

cap

acity

(BTU

/lb.

°F)

0.05

0.1

0.2

0.5

High carbon steel

Cast iron, gray

Aluminum/Silicon carbide composite

Cast Al-alloys

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

10

Page 11: ces edupack material selection

PRICE vs. SPECIFIC HEAT CAPACITY

Trivial importance of the component realizes the vital importance of the material cost

The price range is chosen as shown as the desired category This eliminates ALUMINUM/SILICON CARBIDE COMPOSITE which

was chosen in the first graph as it costs around 5 USD/lb. ALUMINUM ALLOY and HIGH CARBON STEEL exist

Specific heat capacity (BTU/ lb.°F)0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5

Pric

e (U

SD/l

b)

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Price vs Specific heat capacity

Cast iron, gray

High carbon steel

Cast Al-alloys

Aluminum/Silicon carbide composite

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

11

Page 12: ces edupack material selection

MACHINABILITY VS PRICE

The final graph indicates CAST ALUMINUM ALLOY as the material to be selected

Though HIGH CARBON STEEL can be an alternative, the machinability aspect indicates that it cannot be apt

Further the recyclability, high melting point and service temperatures, electrical insulation and chemical inertness shows that CAST ALUMINUM ALLOY can be selected over HIGH CARBON STEEL and ALUMINUM/SILICON CARBIDE COMPOSITE

Price (USD/ lb)0.1 1 10

Mac

hina

bilit

y

1

2

3

4

5 Machinability vs ProcessCast iron, gray

High carbon steel

Aluminum/Silicon carbide composite

Cast Al-alloys

05/02/2023halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

12

Page 13: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

13

Final selection and alternativesMATERIAL

HARDNESS

PRICE HEAT CAPACITY

MACHINABILITY

RECYCLE CHEMICAL RESISTANCE

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY

CAST ALUMINUM ALLOY

60-150HV

0.989-1.09USD/lb

0.215-0.238BTU/lb.°F

4.5 YES YES 2.5-8µohm.cm

HIGH CARBON STEEL

400HV 0.2USD/LB

0.18BTU/LB,F

3.5 YES YES 200MICROOHM.CM

ALUMINUM/SILICON CARBIDE COMPOSITE

70-140HV

2.82-3.76USD/lb

0.191-0.215BTU/lb.°F

1.7 YES YES 5-12µohm.cm

Page 14: ces edupack material selection

05/02/2023 halmstad university, masters in mechanical engineering 2015. [email protected]

14

CONCLUSION: CAST ALUMINUM ALLOY WAS THE APT MATERIAL AS IT COVERED A WIDE RANGE OF DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS.Mechanical propertiesYoung's modulus 10.4 - 12.9 10^6 psiShear modulus 3.63 - 4.93 10^6 psiBulk modulus 9.57 - 10.4 10^6 psiPoisson's ratio 0.32 - 0.36Yield strength (elastic limit) 7.25 - 47.9 ksiTensile strength 9.43 - 56 ksiCompressive strength 7.25 - 47.9 ksiElongation 0.4 - 10 % strainFatigue strength at 10^7 cycles 4.64 - 22.8 ksiMechanical loss coefficient (tan delta) 1e-4 -0.002 ALTERNATIVES:Suggestion 1: HIGH CARBON STEELReason: The table indicates HIGH CARBON STEEL to have a desired characteristics except machinability. aspect in context of the product. Suggestion 2: ALUMINUM/SILICON CARBIDE COMPOSITE Reason: The table indicates ALUMINUM/SILICON CARBIDE COMPOSITE to possess the highest electrical resistance and the moderate hardness. The price being on the higher end is a concern but can still be used where reliable is valued over price.