Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training - Amdo · Alignment Supports career ... Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training 22 tools, ... ll ti di l t M i t i ith Center for

Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training

CAPT CAPT Terry BurtTerry Burt850 452850 452-- 7163 7163

[email protected]@navy.mil 29Jun 1129Jun 11

Mission

Develop, deliver, and support aviation training necessary to meet validated Fleet requirements through a continuum of professional and personal growth forrequirements through a continuum of professional and personal growth for

Sailors and Marines

CORE PROGRAMSCORE PROGRAMS‘A’ Schools > 19 Aviation Ratings, 247 Navy NECs / 81 USMC MOS

‘C’ Schools > 31 USN/USMC Type Model Series Aircraft, FRCs & Afloat ‘I’ LevelOfficer Training >14 Designators for Pilots/NFOs, Aviation Maintenance, &

Aviation Ordnance

Strong Strong Enterprise Enterprise

Requirements based on Requirements based on acquisition life cycle planningacquisition life cycle planning

Integrated Integrated USN / USMC USN / USMC staff/studentstaff/student

Aviation Ordnance

AlignmentAlignment Supports career continuumSupports career continuum staff/student staff/student throughputthroughput

Military Instructors return value to NAEMilitary Instructors return value to NAEReinvest expertise in the fleet upon transferReinvest expertise in the fleet upon transfer

Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 2

Maintain health of the community and sea shore rotationMaintain health of the community and sea shore rotation

Students in Training Students in Training 65176517•• 22 Learning Sites22 Learning Sites

•• 835 835 Courses (CINS) /Courses (CINS) /1340 1340 locations (CDPS)locations (CDPS)

• Students in Training Students in Training 65176517gg

Initial Skill Training 3954 students

Skill Progression Training 2859 students

Functional Skill Training 485 studentsu ct o a S a g 85 stude ts

Officer Training 673 students

•• Annual Student Enrollment Annual Student Enrollment –– 121,108 (FY10)121,108 (FY10)

53,47053,470 (FY11 TD)(FY11 TD)53,470 53,470 (FY11 TD)(FY11 TD)

•• Instructors Instructors –– 22292229

•• Yellow Gear/TTE: Yellow Gear/TTE: 25,298 items25,298 items

•• Support Equipment 13,222 itemsSupport Equipment 13,222 itemsSupport Equipment 13,222 itemsSupport Equipment 13,222 items

•• Electronic Classrooms: Electronic Classrooms: 420 420

•• Major Trainers: Major Trainers: 871 871

•• Total Training Assets value $1 6 BTotal Training Assets value $1 6 B


TRST772R CeTARS4/06/11

Total Training Assets value $1.6 BTotal Training Assets value $1.6 B

Air Board

Naval Aviation Naval Aviation EnterpriseEnterprise

Navy Total Navy Total ForceForce

CNP

Total Force

Air BoardCNP

Total Force CFTNETC

CNATT

RequirementsRequirementsqq

ATBUSMC CNAF


USMC

Training Model Managers (F/A-18, P3, H-60, E2/C2, E-6, EA-6B, H-46, JSF, MH-53)

ATS/Training Mgt Teams (V-22,C-130, H-46, H-1, AV-8, H-53, JSF, UAS) 4

Significant configuration changes affecting major TMS through the FYDP

Aircraft transitions require concurrent training pipelines through the FYDP

Priorities aligned to NAE readiness requirements

NAE emphasis on total learning continuum

CNATT Integrated Production Plan will reduce Total Time to Train and close production gap

Aircraft Transition TimelineLEGACY 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 NEW

F-35CF/A-18E/F

EA-6B EA-18G

F/A-18A/D

c a t a s t o e e

E-2C E-2DP-8ABAMS

EP-3A** EPX

P-3C

MH-60SHH-60H*/SH-60F

MH-53E** HLRC-9 C-40A

C-12B/F/M** C-12 Replacement C-20A/D C-37-A/B

MH 60SMH-60R

HH 60H /SH 60FSH-60B


C-20A/D C-37-A/B

Legacy AircraftTransition PeriodNew Aircraft

* Updated from Current APDF on 5 Oct 2010

NAE NETC/N1New / Increased Requirements

N Pl

CNATTCNATTNavPlan2030MQ-8B

F-35

F/A-18

AAG/ EMALS

PCSIM

TRANETInstructor s

Trainers (TTE)

BRAC USMC

H-1Y/Z KC-130J

Electronic Classrooms

Courseware

NKOMultimedia

BRAC USMCATSP

E-2DH-60S/R

RQ7B

E-2D

P-8ITRO


MAPEA-18G CH-53K

Aviator

Undergrad Grad

FlightTrng

USNAROTCOCS

Recruit FRS

T & R M t i

FRS

T & R M t i

FRS

T & R M t iT & R Matrix T & R Matrix T & R Matrix

Undergrad Grad

Aviation Technical Rating

ASchool

InitialT/M/SCNATT

Career T/M/SCNATT

Boot CampRecruit

Undergrad Grad

In

Service

SEAMCNATT

In

ServiceIn

ServiceTraining

(QPT)

J

Training

(QPT)

Service

Training

(QPT)


E1 - E4

Apprentice

E5 - E6

Journeyman Master

E7 – E9

Recruit

16,000

NEC

ABF

Current FIT Fill, Apprentice

Goal IPP Fit FillRating

Annual Plan 15,005

FY10 Production and Goals

91.5% 102.0%

12,000

14,000AG ASABEABH

Rate Phasing Matrix Adjustments

IPP Goal 12,457

93.7% 150.2%99.3% 122.7%86.9% 92.5%89.2% 94.0%

8,000

10,000

ACADAEAM

92.2% 91.1%93.5% 106.3%93.7% 98.4%93.3% 96.6%

4 000

6,000

, AMAMEAOAT-IAT-O

90.4% 89.9%91.6% 95.4%95.3% 104.1%95 3% 104 1%

2,000

4,000 AT-OAW-O/RAW-SAZPR

95.3% 104.1%92.0% 107.0%108.0% 102.0%99.3% 122.7%91.4% 102.7%


-O N D J F M A M J J A S NETC Production Criteria

> 125% > 90% to 125% Between 75% to 89%

PR 91.4% 102.7%

FY-13 FY-14 FY-15 FY-16 FY-17VFA -301 -301 -280 -280 -280VAQ -33 -27 -23 -23 -23VAW -55 -55 -55 -55 -55F-35C -155 -252 -398 -488 -538Helo/Fire Scout 60 34 -65 -168 -173Helo EXP ROC/POE 0 -421 -428 -696 -688SOF/ISR 0 -400 -400 -400 -400VP 0 15 15 15 15VP 0 -15 -15 -15 -15FRC 0 0 -160 -520 -520BAMS 0 -162 -266 -340 -430UCLAS 0 0 Growth Growth GrowthUCLAS 0 0 Growth Growth GrowthSecurity Billets -10 -20 -20 -20 -20TOTAL -494 -1619 -2110 -3005 -3142


Numbers are based on program estimates and do not include CVN or all training tail requirements

Source: CAPT Tom Macrae, CNAF N19

CNAF

Directs / MonitorRequirements

Deliver the right people with the right

Demand Signal

p p gcompetencies to

accomplish the right work for the best

value ... today and in the future

Trains Sailors/Marines

CNATTTraining Model Manager

CNATTU CO/OIC

SignalMarines

WING MOFRC NATEC

HPPRs, IPTs, Fleet Feedback


C

CNATTU CO/OIC

NATEC

HPPRs, IPTs, Fleet FeedbackWING MO

FRC


C

• Local TRIADs

• QPT PQS• QPT PQS

• Bi-annual HPRR Conferences

• ENARG

• Integrated Logistic Support Management Team (ILSMT)(ILSMT)

• Formal Course Reviews

• Occupational Standard Review

• Rating and TMS IPTs


• Acquisition FEA w/o standardized process12

• Shrinking budgets

• Pressure to document training impact on• Pressure to document training impact on readiness

• Reduced manning levels• Reduced manning levels

• Roll-down in pay-grade and level of experience

M hilMeanwhile…

• Expanding aircraft system complexity and integration of new platformsintegration of new platforms

• Extending life of sundowner platforms with aging systems


systems

. . .more with less13

• Which maintenance degraders are likely suspects for training deficiencies?p g

• What kind of skill and at what level is required to support the required performance?

• At what point(s) in the training continuum is the skill acquired and at what levels?

• Are there any gaps in the training progression? – If so, how are we dealing with them now?

– What would it take, and cost, to fill the gap(s)?

• Who needs to engage, and how?


CNATTU CO/OIC

• Aligning Training to Readiness

• Identifying Gaps

P idi th ‘ i ht t l ’• Providing the ‘right tools’

• Improve response time

• Focusing ResourcesHPPRs, IPTs, • Focusing ResourcesFleet Feedback

NATEC

WING MOFRC

‘In a repeatable process’


In a repeatable process

Triad / CNATT Response Engine Triad / CNATT Response Engine CNATTU CO/OIC

HPPRs, IPTs, Fleet

NATEC

HPRR, IPT, Fleet Feedback

WING MOFRC


NATEC ELAR perspective

• “Unable to effectively utilize schematic drawings to troubleshoot/ repair”

• “Improper repair of electrical connector components”

• “Do not have an adequate knowledge of System Signal Flow“

“Th t h i i i f th f l t i i t th• “The technicians coming from the formal training to the Fleet have no understanding of the system”

• “Most Sailors unable to correlate OTPS instructions,Most Sailors unable to correlate OTPS instructions, pubs, and schematics to effectively troubleshoot basic WRA/CASS station issues”


• Visual inspection techniques as aid in troubleshooting is not being reinforced”

17

Aviator/aircrew training only. No accounting for maintainer training

Combined maintenance & aviator/aircrew personnel makes Maintenance tasks p

metric insensitive to gaps in aviators/aircrew

Aircraft systems only. No accounting for

support equipment/IMRL

are implied in aviator/aircrew

tasks

Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingSource: Russell Scott, CNAL N81

18

Directly measures contribution of

aviators/aircrew

Specific to aviator/aircrew

training

Add logistics NTAs to explicitly measure

Directly measures contribution of appropriate personnel in maintenance departments Directly measures

Specific to maintainer


explicitly measure logistics readiness

maintenance departments contribution of support equipment/IMRL

training

Source: Russell Scott, CNAL N81 19

Engaged to dateNETC COO NATECCNAF N42COMFRC / AIR 6.0AIR 6 7

NATECCNATTU CO /OiCs NAE TF ESC

AIR 6.7

Next stepsR fi th i l di idRefine the process including rapid responseEvaluate the pilot feedbackSelect candidate issuesVisit the Wings / FRCs Report findings. . .


Maintaining legacy training while meeting new platform transition requirementsq

Funding requirements transfer from N88 to N1. . .

Fleet Returnees/C School Utilization/NEC Award Fleet Returnees/C School Utilization/NEC Award

“We will develop a comprehensive strategy for the use of high fidelity simulators in training


We will develop a comprehensive strategy for the use of high fidelity simulators in training. . . provides the right balance of live and simulated training to the Fleet.”

CNO Guidance for 2011

Extending Integrated Production Plan (IPP) to FRC & USMC

USMC Production/Time-to-Train Alignment

Training TRIAD Training TRIAD

HPRR value

Li ki T i i P f t Fl t R di Linking Training Performance to Fleet Readiness

“. . .we have an obligation to set up our Sailors for success by providing them with the tools, training, and the time needed to deploy with confidence in their ability to accomplish


tools, training, and the time needed to deploy with confidence in their ability to accomplish their assigned missions.”

Admiral J. C. Harvey USN Fleet Forces


Triad/CNATTTriad/CNATT Response EngineResponse Engine


Requirements Requirements to Training to Training DeliveryDeliveryLinkageLinkage

Technical Training CurriculumDefense Readiness Reporting S t

gg

EO

Key Learning Points

KSAKSAKSA

JTF NMETL

JMETL

Group NMETL

W f CDR

System

EO

EO

EO

Key Learning Points

KSAKSAKSA

TOMESM

Unit NMETL

CRITICAL &FREQUENT CTTL

Warfare CDRNMETL

APPROVEDNTSP

MASTERTASK LIST

EO

EO

EO

Key Learning Points

KSAKSAKSA

TOFREQUENTTASKS

T/M/S MC and FMCreadiness goals

TRPPM

AnalysisMPT INPUTS TO

CONCEPT

TRAININGSYSTEM ACQ STRATEGYPLAN

NTSP EOKey Learning Points

KSAKSAKSA


REFINEMENT

RFPTraining System Development

LearningLearning Lessons from NAELessons from NAEAviator trainingAviator training

VADMs Zortman Kilcline Meyers all

CNAF Policy Message 18 Apr 06 Objective:

VADMs Zortman, Kilcline, Meyers all identified training system contribution to Aviator readiness as major analysis requirements

I t O t tAviator Readiness Training • The same process and tool should be applied for

Maintainer training

START

Tool

Inputs• NTAs• T&R Matrix• Skills• Tasks

Outputs• Training

System Specs• Cost-benefit• ROI

Maintainer training

• Problem: What the Fleet needs is not well articulated and aligned for Maintainers

– Alignment of the requirements across Acquisition/Schoolhouse/Fleet is needed to identifyTasks ROI

• Process applied across 10 Navy T/M/S,• Modified process being applied to Marine

Acquisition/Schoolhouse/Fleet is needed to identify performance gaps.

– A modified START process could guide acquisition of training to fill gaps.

– Logistics NTAs could be invoked and reported, ll ti di l t M i t i ith

Systematic Team Assessment of Readiness Training


p g ppAir.

• $163M awarded across FYDP.

allocating readiness value to Maintainers, as with Aviators.

Documents

Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training - Amdo · Alignment Supports career ... Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training 22 tools, ... ll ti di l t M i t i ith Center for