Upload
lesley
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Caution: Large-Scale Projects at Work. Columbia University Libraries: Butler Library’s Media Center and Digital Humanities Center Bethany Edwards LIS 698-01: Practicum Dean Giannini. 1) Kim’s Video DVD donation 2) Reference Desk 3) Digital Humanities Center. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Columbia University Libraries: Butler Library’s Media Center and Digital Humanities Center
Bethany EdwardsLIS 698-01: PracticumDean Giannini
*Caution: Large-Scale Projects at Work
*Interning at Butler Library
*1) Kim’s Video DVD donation
*2) Reference Desk
*3) Digital Humanities Center
*Kim’s Video DVD’s
*Cataloging system: Voyager*Fairly straightforward
copy cataloging*Some foreign films
required some detective skills
*Russian characters for “English subtitles”
*The Reference Desk
*Sunday afternoons*“This is due on Monday.”*Advanced research
questions*Lots of questions about
technology and the library’s online tools.*CLIO*Subject Guides*Printer Privileges?
*Digital Humanities Center
*Official Practicum Project
*Bob Scott, Director
*DHC is in conversation with Digital Science Center and Digital Social Science Center
*Planned future expansion
*DHC: “New in 2012”
*DSC and DSSC have been renovated in the past few years*DHC has been told they will get a
renovation and an additional space *Assessment of current DHC is planned
before renovation/expansion—data driven improvements*Issues: Delays, no assessment librarian
*DHC: New Space
*Literature review
*Open questions about use of space will be included in faculty focus group sessions
*Unique nature of the space presents challenges
*DHC: Focus Groups
*Focus on faculty: Database
*Focus on process: Best practices in conducting focus groups in libraries
*Focus on action: Questions, notices, meetings
*Focus on the future: Work in progress
*Digital Tools
*Filemaker Pro*RefWorks*Google docs*Familiarity with DHC’s tools
*ABBYY Fine Reader*Adobe Suite*Nvivo 9*Arc, Google Earth*SPSS
*Findings
*Based on previous assessment results, DHC is on the right track in terms of gathering and interpreting data.*Staff associated with DHC are very enthusiastic*Lack of an assessment librarian (or someone in a
similar role) made the smallest steps more difficult*“Intern” status has prevented useful interaction
with the IRB*Why hasn’t focus group happened yet?
*Faculty seem to respect the DHC and digital scholarship*Main barrier is time and resources*DHC director , steering committee, and faculty selected
for focus groups have limited time