Upload
meagan-thornton
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Brief evaluation of REMAD and CMAQ for east Texas tracers
Mark Green, DRIModel results from Christian Seigneur and Betty Pun- AER (CMAQ and REMSAD),
and Mike Barna- CIRA (REMSAD)
Methodology
• Evaluation used 6-hour tracer data and model predictions for two 10-day periods where tracer data was sequestered: August 15-25, 1999; October 5-15, 1999
1) Average observation (paired data only) = OONi
N
i
1
1
2) Average prediction (paired data only) = PPNi
N
i
1
1
3) Bias of mean OP
4) Standard deviation of predictions and observations= p , o 5) Coefficient of variation predictions and observations=
P
p , O
o
6) RMS Error = 2
1
)(1ii
N
i
OPN
7) RMS error normalized by mean observation = O
OPN
ii
N
i
2
1
)(1
8) Correlation coefficient between predicted and observed values 9) Regression equation between predicted and observed
10) Frequency distribution of observations and predictions plot 11) Scatterplots 12) Time series 13) Spatial pattern comparison
BRAVO Study Tracer Release & Monitoring Locations
bsp and estimated SO4 scattering
0102030405060708090
7/9 7/19 7/29 8/8 8/18 8/28 9/7 9/17 9/27 10/7 10/17 10/27
b sp o
r sul
fate
sca
tterin
g (M
m-1
)
24 hr SO4 scat 24 hr bsp
CMAQ CMAQ
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26
BNL
i-PPC
H (fL
/L)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26
part
icul
ate
S (n
g/m
3)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
August- Particulate S and observed iPPCH
Northeast Texas tracer and Observed S
Northeast Texas tracer
Observed S
12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD NE Texas tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26
BNL
i-PPC
H (fL
/L)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26
CMAQ
i-PP
CH (f
L/L)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
August- CMAQ and observed iPPCH
Look at CMAQ first… Obs
Preds
12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD NE Texas tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26
BN
L iP
PCH
(fL/
L)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
0.000.02
0.040.060.080.10
0.120.140.16
0.180.20
8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26
REM
SAD
iPPC
H (f
L/L)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
August- REMSAD and observed iPPCH
Now REMSAD… Obs
Preds
Tracer Release from Big Brown, 22-Aug-1999 00:00 GMT
CMAQ-12km REMSAD-36km
A u g u s t P P C H ( B i g B r o w n t r a c e r )o b s e r v e d a n d C M A Q 3 6 k m
- 0 . 0 5
0 . 0 0
0 . 0 5
0 . 1 0
0 . 1 5
0 . 2 0
8 / 1 4 8 / 1 5 8 / 1 6 8 / 1 7 8 / 1 8 8 / 1 9 8 / 2 0 8 / 2 1 8 / 2 2 8 / 2 3 8 / 2 4 8 / 2 5 8 / 2 6
BNL i-P
PCH (fL
/L)
B I B E
F T S T
M A R A
M O N A
P R S G
S N V I
- 0 . 1
0
0 . 1
0 . 2
0 . 3
0 . 4
0 . 5
0 . 6
8 / 1 4 8 / 1 6 8 / 1 8 8 / 2 0 8 / 2 2 8 / 2 4 8 / 2 6
PP
CH
(fL
/L)
B I B EF T S TM A R AM O N AP R S GS N V I
CMAQ 36 km
Obs
PPCH Plume Movement (36 km and 4 km)22 August 7, 13, 19 GMT
From AER
August iPPCHBNL CMAQ REMSAD Bret w=div
mean 0.029 0.017 0.036 0.019std 0.044 0.051 0.052 0.046COV 1.51 3.10 1.47 2.46bias of mean 0.56 1.22 0.63r 0.08 0.67 0.46r squared 0.01 0.45 0.21RMSE 0.066 0.040 0.048Norm RMSE 2.26 1.38 1.63
Model performance summary statistics –Northeast Texas tracer, August episode
August ocPDCHBNL CMAQ REMSAD Bret w=div
mean 0.52 0.62 0.57 0.66std 0.71 0.76 0.54 0.99COV 1.37 1.22 0.94 1.50bias of mean 1.19 1.10 1.27r 0.25 0.39 0.35r squared 0.06 0.15 0.12RMSE 0.91 0.70 1.01Norm RMSE 1.74 1.35 1.94
Model performance summary statistics – Eagle Pass tracer, August episode
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16
BNL
PTCH
(fL/
L) BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16
Parti
cula
teS
(ng/
m3)
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
October- Particulate S and observed PTCH
Houston tracer and observed S
Houston tracer
Observed S
12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Houston tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16
AER
PTCH
(fL/
L) BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16
BNL
PTCH
(fL/
L)
BIBEFTST
MARAMONA
PRSGSNVI
October- CMAQ and observed PTCH
Look at CMAQ first…
Obs
Preds
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16
REM
SAD
PTC
H
BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16
BNL
PTCH
(fL/
L) BIBE
FTST
MARA
MONA
PRSG
SNVI
October- REMSAD and observed PTCH
12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Houston tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period
Now REMSAD…
Obs
Preds
CMAQ 12 and 4 km simulation PTCH (Houston Tracer) October 12
6-hour average starting 19 GMT22 GMT
REMSAD PTCH
36 km
12 km
REMSAD vs. CMAQ36 km vs. 12 km
PTCH (Houston Tracer) October 12
- 0 . 2 0
- 0 . 1 0
0 . 0 0
0 . 1 0
0 . 2 0
0 . 3 0
0 . 4 0
0 . 5 0
1 0 / 4 1 0 / 5 1 0 / 6 1 0 / 7 1 0 / 8 1 0 / 9 1 0 / 1 0 1 0 / 1 1 1 0 / 1 2 1 0 / 1 3 1 0 / 1 4 1 0 / 1 5 1 0 / 1 6
BNL PTCH (fL/L)
B I B E
F T S T
M A R A
M O N A
P R S G
S N V I
O c t o b e r P T C H ( H o u s t o n t r a c e r ) o b s e r v e d a n d C M A Q 3 6 k m
- 0 . 1
0
0 . 1
0 . 2
0 . 3
0 . 4
0 . 5
1 0 / 4 1 0 / 6 1 0 / 8 1 0 / 1 0 1 0 / 1 2 1 0 / 1 4 1 0 / 1 6
PT
CH
(fL
/L)
B I B EF T S TM A R AM O N AP R S GS N V I
CMAQ 36 km
Obs
PTCH Plume Movement (36 km and 4 km)12 October 19 GMT; 13 October 1, 7 GMT
0.15
0.15
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.15
0.05
0.05
From AER
AER summary of CMAQ tracer transport
• In the 36 km simulations, tracer plumes still miss monitoring sites at and near Big Bend on some days
• In both the 36 and 4 km simulations for August, the PPCH plumes are too far East
• In both the 36 and 4 km simulations for October, the PTCH plumes are too far South
• 36 km simulations bring plume a lot closer to Big Bend than 4 km simulations
October PTCHBNL CMAQ REMSAD Bret w=div
mean 0.14 0.03 0.05 0.08std 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.14COV 0.71 2.49 0.77 1.73bias of mean 0.19 0.38 0.57r 0.00 0.18 0.10r squared 0.00 0.03 0.01RMSE 0.17 0.13 0.17Norm RMSE 1.17 0.94 1.22
Model performance summary statistics –northeast Texas tracer, August episode
Model performance summary statistics – Eagle Pass tracer, October episode
October ocPDCHBNL CMAQ REMSAD Bret w=div
mean 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.53std 0.71 0.69 0.40 1.79norm std 1.97 2.36 1.39 3.39bias of mean 0.81 0.80 1.46r 0.43 0.25 0.05r squared 0.19 0.06 0.00RMSE 0.75 0.73 1.89Norm RMSE 2.07 2.01 5.24
SO4 at K-BAR, July-October 1999
Total Sulfur at K-BAR, July-October 1999
October Episode, 4-km SimulationRegression Analysis
y = 0.3872x + 2.1778R2 = 0.6851
0
2
4
6
8
0 2 4 6 8Obs ervat ions
Sim
ulat
ed V
alue
s
Sulfate (g/m3) at Big Bend From AER