Blb Developments Screening Opinion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion

    1/6

    SCREENING OPINION

    THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SCOTLAND) REGULATIONS 1999

    SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR 8/2007

    RESPONSE OF SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL TO A REQUEST SUBMITTED UNDER

    REGULATION 5 OF THE EIA REGULATIONS (1999) BY BLB DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

    FOR A SCREENING OPINION FROM THE COUNCIL AS PLANNING AUTHORITY IN

    RESPECT OF A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT GLENAPP ESTATE, NEAR BALLANTRAE

    Introduction

    Luce Bay plant Hire Limited are seeking to develop approximately 3 hectares of land

    located on the Glenapp Estate, south of Ballantrae for a hard rock quarry and access

    road to the site. Their agent, BLB Developments Limited, has requested from the

    council a formal Screening Opinion to determine whether an environmental impact

    assessment is required for the development proposal.

    Background

    It is understood that the applicant has engaged in pre-application consultation with

    the council in which a Screening Opinion was discussed.

    It has been considered that the proposed development falls within Schedule 2 of the

    Regulations noted above and as follows;

    2. Extractive industry

    (a) Quarries, open-cast mining and peat extraction (unless included in schedule 1).

    Site Description

    The site for which the Screening Opinion has been requested is located within a rural

    setting, some 4 miles south of Ballantrae. The site is surrounded by the Aughtshillin

    Wood in the Glenapp estate, containing an existing quarry within the site and a

    gravel quarry nearby. The proposal would utilise the existing A77 and current access

    road located approximately 1/3 km north of the proposal site to provide access to

    the quarry. The site is lies on the eastern slope at the foot of the Carlock Hill (323m).

    The proposed development borders the Glenapp and Galloway Mores Site of Special

    Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Scenic Protection Area (SPA) to the west. The area has

    been designated as such by SNH for reasons of flora, fauna (Hen Harrier as listed in

    Annex 1 of the EC Birds Directive) and geological or physiographical features.

  • 7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion

    2/6

    Furthermore, the proposed access route is in fact within the SSSI and SPA.

    Furthermore, the site is within the Ancient Woodland Inventory and is a designated

    Scenic Area under ENV 8 of the South Ayrshire local Plan (SALP). At the summit of

    the fore mentioned Carlock Hill lays an Archaeology Conservation Trigger, identified

    as the Carlock Cairn (remains of).

    Selection Criteria for Assessment to inform Screening Opinion

    The proposal falls into category 2 (Extractive Industry) of Schedule 2 of the

    Environmental Impact Assessment (Scotland) Regulations 1999. The EIA regulations

    state that only Schedule 2 developments which are likely to have a significant

    environmental impact are to be subject to EIA. Therefore, this assessment which isinforming the screening opinion is examining whether the proposal provided by BLB

    Developments Limited is likely to have any significant environmental effects.

    In accordance with Schedule 3 of the act the following selection criteria will be used

    to inform the Screening Opinion.

    Characteristics of Development:

    a) The size of the development;b) The cumulation with other development;c) The use of natural resources;d) The production of waste;e) Pollution and nuisance;f) The risk of accidents, having regard in particular to substances or technologies

    used

    Location of Development:

    a) The existing land use;b) The relative abundance, quality and regenerative capacity of natural resources in

    the area;

    c) The absorbing capacity of the natural environment, paying particular attention tothe following areas:-

    i. wetlands;ii. coastal zones;iii. mountain and forest areas;iv. nature reserves and parks;v. areas classified or protected under Member states legislation; areas

    designated by Member States pursuant to Council Directive 79/409/EEC

  • 7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion

    3/6

    on the conservation of wild birds and Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the

    conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora;

    vi. areas in which the environmental quality standards laid down incommunity legislation have already been exceeded;

    vii. densely populated areas;viii. Landscapes of historical, cultural or archaeological significance.

    Characteristics of the Potential Impact:

    Consideration of the potential significant effects of the development in relation to the

    foregoing criteria and having particular regard to:-

    a) The extent of the impact (geographical areas and size of the affectedpopulation);

    b) The transfrontier nature of the impact;c)

    The magnitude and complexity of the impact;

    d) The probability of the impact; ande) The duration, frequency and reversibility of the impact

    Assessment: Characteristics of Development

    Annex B of Circular 8/2007 sets out a checklist which can be used to inform the

    Screening opinion. This Annex has been adopted to ensure a level of consistency is

    maintained throughout the process. The fore mentioned checklist relates to Schedule

    3 of the EIA regulations noted above.

    a) The proposed development is estimated to encompass 3 hectares of land. Additionallythe proposal plans to create a new access route extending for 1/3 of a kilometre,

    connecting to an existing road. Due to the scale of the local rurality and forested nature

    of the surrounding area, it is perceived that the 3 hectares required for the quarry will

    not be out of scale with the existing environment, while the forested area is likely to

    provide cover for the quarry and reduce any adverse visual impact on the local area.

    b) The proposed hard rock quarry is in close proximity to a disused gravel quarry to thenorthwest and Carlock House to the East, on the opposite side of the A77, of which is

    unlikely to endure any significant environmental impact. More information was sought

    regarding the cumulation to the existing quarry site to determine whether the proposal is to

    extend the existing quarry site, as this would require an assessment of the cumulative

    environmental impact as identified in paragraph 46 of The Regulations. However, with

    consideration to the aforementioned information it was deemed that the location of the

    existing quarry would be included within a formal EIA of the site.

    c) The extraction of hard rock means that natural resources will be used as a matter ofcourse. However, hard rock is not considered to be in short supply and therefore not

    predicted to cause any significant damage.

  • 7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion

    4/6

    d) Waste production is not considered to be of environmental concern as it is not within thedevelopers economic interest to accumulate waste while the site is operational.

    e) Noise pollution from the development is likely to be of particular nuisance due to blastingoperations. Although the impact on public amenity is likely to be limited due to the

    distance from any settlement, fauna protected under the local SSSI and SPA may be

    adversely affected, while dust from the site could have a similar impact. Equipment and

    machinery associated with quarrying is also likely to be considerably noisy. It must also

    be noted that as the site lies in the catchment area of the Water of App, surface run-off

    will deposit surface debris (machinery oil, dust, loose rock) into this water course.

    f) The very nature of blasting presents a high risk of accident. Dust is also extremelyharmful to the human health of those working on site.

    Assessment: Location of Development

    a) As previously mentioned the proposal site lies within a rural setting located 4 milesfrom Ballantrae. The site is located within an existing quarry and expands to the

    surrounding forested area.

    b) No scarce resources have been identified in the area. However, the inclusion of theforested site in which the proposal is located in the Ancient Woodland Inventory

    suggests that the wood is of high quality.

    c) The site itself is located within the Ancient Woodland Inventory and a protectedScenic Area under policy ENV 8 of the South Ayrshire Local Plan. It is likely that

    some trees will require to be cleared as part of the proposal. The site is also on the

    fringe of the Glenapp and Galloway Moors SSSI and EU designated SPA, while part of

    the proposal is to locate a road within the designated protection site/area. Due to the

    nature and location of the proposal it is considered that the proximity to the SSSI

    and EU SPA and the importance of them in a local, national and European context

    are likely to be negatively impacted by the proposal. A variety of endangered flora

    and fauna have been identified by SNH for their unique properties within these

    designated protection zones.

    In March 2007 a Desk based archaeological assessment and walk over survey was

    conducted on the North East corner of the site. This was a 34 hectare study within

    and to the north of the site for which a Screening Opinion was requested. 10

    archaeologically significant sites were identified. Moreover, the Carlock Cairn at the

    summit of the Carlock Hill has been identified as an Archaeology Conservation

    Trigger, suggesting further evidence of archaeological significance in the area.

    Therefore, the council refer to SALP Policy BE 6 stating

  • 7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion

    5/6

    Policy BE6: The council will seek to protect scheduled ancient monuments (including

    their setting) and archaeological sites and encourage sympathetic proposals for their

    promotion for educational or recreational purposes.

    Assessment: Characteristics of Potential Impacts

    a)Although the development proposal is contained within a 3 hectare site. It islikely that the extent of the development will spread out with the proposal site.

    Noise pollution from blasting and machinery is considered to emanate out with

    the site and into a reasonable proportion of the surrounding area, including the

    SSSI and SPA, impacting upon the protected local biodiversity. Furthermore, it is

    envisaged that surface debris may be transported into the nearby watercourse

    due to the sloped nature of the proposal site, effecting marine biodiversity. It is

    deemed unlikely that the environmental impacts of a hard rock quarry wouldimpact on human health.

    b) The envisaged negative impact on the local biodiversity is expected to lastcontinuously throughout the life of the development. Within time it is likely that

    the harm done to local flora and fauna will be recovered.

    Conclusion

    From the assessment taken in accordance with the regulations and Circular 8/2007

    the council concludes that the proposed development of a Hard Rock Quarry on an

    estimated 3 hectares of land on the Glenapp Estate is likely to require a formal

    environmental impact assessment.

    From the information submitted on behalf of Luce Bay plant Hire the environmental

    impacts as a result of the development are likely to be significant in the proposed

    location for the following sets of reasons.

    Firstly, much of the protected land immediately to the west of the site isenvironmentally significant under the Glenapp and Galloway Moors SSSI and

    EU designated SPA. Furthermore, the proposed access to the site is contained

    within the fore mentioned designated sites. It is likely that the quarry and

    access road would upset the character of the SSSI and SPA, especially due to

    noise and dust.

    Secondly, the proposal is located within a designated Scenic Area identifiedwithin the SALP, having the potential to upset the character of this.

  • 7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion

    6/6

    Thirdly, the proposal site is located within the Ancient Woodland Inventory,which may contain habitats for biodiversity since the 16th Century. This may

    be upset by blasting, while it is considered that a vast amount of these trees

    would need to be cut to accommodate a 3 hectare quarry.

    Fourthly, debris generated from quarry works is envisaged to enter the Waterof App, due to the sloping nature of the proposed development site. Rubble

    and dust may choke the water course, effecting marine organisms.

    Finally, it is expected that the site holds a degree of archaeologicalsignificance and will require an archaeological survey to realise the

    archaeological significance of the site.

    Although the council recognise that the development proposal does not meetthe 15 hectare size or 30 000 tonnes of extraction, the sensitive location ofthe site is the main consideration.