Upload
yrdgcgf5664
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion
1/6
SCREENING OPINION
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SCOTLAND) REGULATIONS 1999
SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR 8/2007
RESPONSE OF SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL TO A REQUEST SUBMITTED UNDER
REGULATION 5 OF THE EIA REGULATIONS (1999) BY BLB DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
FOR A SCREENING OPINION FROM THE COUNCIL AS PLANNING AUTHORITY IN
RESPECT OF A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT GLENAPP ESTATE, NEAR BALLANTRAE
Introduction
Luce Bay plant Hire Limited are seeking to develop approximately 3 hectares of land
located on the Glenapp Estate, south of Ballantrae for a hard rock quarry and access
road to the site. Their agent, BLB Developments Limited, has requested from the
council a formal Screening Opinion to determine whether an environmental impact
assessment is required for the development proposal.
Background
It is understood that the applicant has engaged in pre-application consultation with
the council in which a Screening Opinion was discussed.
It has been considered that the proposed development falls within Schedule 2 of the
Regulations noted above and as follows;
2. Extractive industry
(a) Quarries, open-cast mining and peat extraction (unless included in schedule 1).
Site Description
The site for which the Screening Opinion has been requested is located within a rural
setting, some 4 miles south of Ballantrae. The site is surrounded by the Aughtshillin
Wood in the Glenapp estate, containing an existing quarry within the site and a
gravel quarry nearby. The proposal would utilise the existing A77 and current access
road located approximately 1/3 km north of the proposal site to provide access to
the quarry. The site is lies on the eastern slope at the foot of the Carlock Hill (323m).
The proposed development borders the Glenapp and Galloway Mores Site of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Scenic Protection Area (SPA) to the west. The area has
been designated as such by SNH for reasons of flora, fauna (Hen Harrier as listed in
Annex 1 of the EC Birds Directive) and geological or physiographical features.
7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion
2/6
Furthermore, the proposed access route is in fact within the SSSI and SPA.
Furthermore, the site is within the Ancient Woodland Inventory and is a designated
Scenic Area under ENV 8 of the South Ayrshire local Plan (SALP). At the summit of
the fore mentioned Carlock Hill lays an Archaeology Conservation Trigger, identified
as the Carlock Cairn (remains of).
Selection Criteria for Assessment to inform Screening Opinion
The proposal falls into category 2 (Extractive Industry) of Schedule 2 of the
Environmental Impact Assessment (Scotland) Regulations 1999. The EIA regulations
state that only Schedule 2 developments which are likely to have a significant
environmental impact are to be subject to EIA. Therefore, this assessment which isinforming the screening opinion is examining whether the proposal provided by BLB
Developments Limited is likely to have any significant environmental effects.
In accordance with Schedule 3 of the act the following selection criteria will be used
to inform the Screening Opinion.
Characteristics of Development:
a) The size of the development;b) The cumulation with other development;c) The use of natural resources;d) The production of waste;e) Pollution and nuisance;f) The risk of accidents, having regard in particular to substances or technologies
used
Location of Development:
a) The existing land use;b) The relative abundance, quality and regenerative capacity of natural resources in
the area;
c) The absorbing capacity of the natural environment, paying particular attention tothe following areas:-
i. wetlands;ii. coastal zones;iii. mountain and forest areas;iv. nature reserves and parks;v. areas classified or protected under Member states legislation; areas
designated by Member States pursuant to Council Directive 79/409/EEC
7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion
3/6
on the conservation of wild birds and Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the
conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora;
vi. areas in which the environmental quality standards laid down incommunity legislation have already been exceeded;
vii. densely populated areas;viii. Landscapes of historical, cultural or archaeological significance.
Characteristics of the Potential Impact:
Consideration of the potential significant effects of the development in relation to the
foregoing criteria and having particular regard to:-
a) The extent of the impact (geographical areas and size of the affectedpopulation);
b) The transfrontier nature of the impact;c)
The magnitude and complexity of the impact;
d) The probability of the impact; ande) The duration, frequency and reversibility of the impact
Assessment: Characteristics of Development
Annex B of Circular 8/2007 sets out a checklist which can be used to inform the
Screening opinion. This Annex has been adopted to ensure a level of consistency is
maintained throughout the process. The fore mentioned checklist relates to Schedule
3 of the EIA regulations noted above.
a) The proposed development is estimated to encompass 3 hectares of land. Additionallythe proposal plans to create a new access route extending for 1/3 of a kilometre,
connecting to an existing road. Due to the scale of the local rurality and forested nature
of the surrounding area, it is perceived that the 3 hectares required for the quarry will
not be out of scale with the existing environment, while the forested area is likely to
provide cover for the quarry and reduce any adverse visual impact on the local area.
b) The proposed hard rock quarry is in close proximity to a disused gravel quarry to thenorthwest and Carlock House to the East, on the opposite side of the A77, of which is
unlikely to endure any significant environmental impact. More information was sought
regarding the cumulation to the existing quarry site to determine whether the proposal is to
extend the existing quarry site, as this would require an assessment of the cumulative
environmental impact as identified in paragraph 46 of The Regulations. However, with
consideration to the aforementioned information it was deemed that the location of the
existing quarry would be included within a formal EIA of the site.
c) The extraction of hard rock means that natural resources will be used as a matter ofcourse. However, hard rock is not considered to be in short supply and therefore not
predicted to cause any significant damage.
7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion
4/6
d) Waste production is not considered to be of environmental concern as it is not within thedevelopers economic interest to accumulate waste while the site is operational.
e) Noise pollution from the development is likely to be of particular nuisance due to blastingoperations. Although the impact on public amenity is likely to be limited due to the
distance from any settlement, fauna protected under the local SSSI and SPA may be
adversely affected, while dust from the site could have a similar impact. Equipment and
machinery associated with quarrying is also likely to be considerably noisy. It must also
be noted that as the site lies in the catchment area of the Water of App, surface run-off
will deposit surface debris (machinery oil, dust, loose rock) into this water course.
f) The very nature of blasting presents a high risk of accident. Dust is also extremelyharmful to the human health of those working on site.
Assessment: Location of Development
a) As previously mentioned the proposal site lies within a rural setting located 4 milesfrom Ballantrae. The site is located within an existing quarry and expands to the
surrounding forested area.
b) No scarce resources have been identified in the area. However, the inclusion of theforested site in which the proposal is located in the Ancient Woodland Inventory
suggests that the wood is of high quality.
c) The site itself is located within the Ancient Woodland Inventory and a protectedScenic Area under policy ENV 8 of the South Ayrshire Local Plan. It is likely that
some trees will require to be cleared as part of the proposal. The site is also on the
fringe of the Glenapp and Galloway Moors SSSI and EU designated SPA, while part of
the proposal is to locate a road within the designated protection site/area. Due to the
nature and location of the proposal it is considered that the proximity to the SSSI
and EU SPA and the importance of them in a local, national and European context
are likely to be negatively impacted by the proposal. A variety of endangered flora
and fauna have been identified by SNH for their unique properties within these
designated protection zones.
In March 2007 a Desk based archaeological assessment and walk over survey was
conducted on the North East corner of the site. This was a 34 hectare study within
and to the north of the site for which a Screening Opinion was requested. 10
archaeologically significant sites were identified. Moreover, the Carlock Cairn at the
summit of the Carlock Hill has been identified as an Archaeology Conservation
Trigger, suggesting further evidence of archaeological significance in the area.
Therefore, the council refer to SALP Policy BE 6 stating
7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion
5/6
Policy BE6: The council will seek to protect scheduled ancient monuments (including
their setting) and archaeological sites and encourage sympathetic proposals for their
promotion for educational or recreational purposes.
Assessment: Characteristics of Potential Impacts
a)Although the development proposal is contained within a 3 hectare site. It islikely that the extent of the development will spread out with the proposal site.
Noise pollution from blasting and machinery is considered to emanate out with
the site and into a reasonable proportion of the surrounding area, including the
SSSI and SPA, impacting upon the protected local biodiversity. Furthermore, it is
envisaged that surface debris may be transported into the nearby watercourse
due to the sloped nature of the proposal site, effecting marine biodiversity. It is
deemed unlikely that the environmental impacts of a hard rock quarry wouldimpact on human health.
b) The envisaged negative impact on the local biodiversity is expected to lastcontinuously throughout the life of the development. Within time it is likely that
the harm done to local flora and fauna will be recovered.
Conclusion
From the assessment taken in accordance with the regulations and Circular 8/2007
the council concludes that the proposed development of a Hard Rock Quarry on an
estimated 3 hectares of land on the Glenapp Estate is likely to require a formal
environmental impact assessment.
From the information submitted on behalf of Luce Bay plant Hire the environmental
impacts as a result of the development are likely to be significant in the proposed
location for the following sets of reasons.
Firstly, much of the protected land immediately to the west of the site isenvironmentally significant under the Glenapp and Galloway Moors SSSI and
EU designated SPA. Furthermore, the proposed access to the site is contained
within the fore mentioned designated sites. It is likely that the quarry and
access road would upset the character of the SSSI and SPA, especially due to
noise and dust.
Secondly, the proposal is located within a designated Scenic Area identifiedwithin the SALP, having the potential to upset the character of this.
7/28/2019 Blb Developments Screening Opinion
6/6
Thirdly, the proposal site is located within the Ancient Woodland Inventory,which may contain habitats for biodiversity since the 16th Century. This may
be upset by blasting, while it is considered that a vast amount of these trees
would need to be cut to accommodate a 3 hectare quarry.
Fourthly, debris generated from quarry works is envisaged to enter the Waterof App, due to the sloping nature of the proposed development site. Rubble
and dust may choke the water course, effecting marine organisms.
Finally, it is expected that the site holds a degree of archaeologicalsignificance and will require an archaeological survey to realise the
archaeological significance of the site.
Although the council recognise that the development proposal does not meetthe 15 hectare size or 30 000 tonnes of extraction, the sensitive location ofthe site is the main consideration.