Biophysics GYoon

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    1/18

    Spectroscopic Analysis for biological samples :

    towards in situ sample analysis of body fluids

    Gilwon Yoon

    September 27, 2006

    Seoul National University of Technology

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    2/18

    Spectra of water, Hb(RBC), albumin, glucose

    from visible to NIR (water compensated)

    400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.5 mm pathlength, temperature control, 37

    albumin, 8 g/dl

    hemoglobin, 16.9 g/dl

    glucose, 5g/dl

    absorbance

    wavelength (nm)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    ab

    sorbance,water

    water

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    3/18

    Absorption spectrum of water

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    4/18

    Involved Key Technologies

    Spectroscopic

    detection

    targetcomponent

    Interfering

    substances

    inhomogeneous medium

    Visible/IRLight source

    Light interactionwith tissue

    High S/N

    electronic

    detection

    Chemometrics

    Clinical testStatistical

    analysis

    Prediction of

    concentration

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    5/18

    Spectroscopic Analysis Statistical Methods

    Influence of measurement setup : Transmission or

    reflection measurement

    Influence of red blood cell (hemoglobin) in partial least

    squares regression (PLSR) analysis

    Independent Component Analysis (ICA) a methodwithout calibration process

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    6/18

    I. Influence of measurement setup :

    Transmission or reflection measurement

    (a ) (b)

    Lightsource Mono-chromator

    sli t

    Detec torSample

    Detec to r

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    7/18

    Comparison between reflectance and transmittance

    Jeon, Hwang, Hahn, Yoon (2006), 11:1:014022, Journal of Biomedical Optics

    83.5840.471100-1830

    39.0726.461100-1830

    2050-2392diffuse transmittance

    (2mm thick sample)

    43.514.502064-2338

    26.772.881100-1800

    24.693.221100-1800

    2064-2338diffuse transmittance

    (1mm thick sample)

    192.0030.571850-2500

    437.5415.911100-1850

    275.4427.381100-2500

    diffuse reflectance(10mm thick sample)

    SEP

    [mg/dl]

    SEC

    [mg/dl]

    wavelength

    region [nm]

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    8/18

    Diffuse reflectance between 1100 and 1850 nm (a) SECV with respect to the

    optimal number of factor, (b) Loading vector of calibration model, (c)

    Regression vector of calibration model, (d) Prediction of glucose illustrated

    with the intralipid concentrations of sample solutions.

    0 2 4 6 8 100

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-0.20

    -0.15

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

    -60000

    -40000

    -20000

    0

    20000

    40000

    0 200 400 600 800 1000

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.08s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.16

    s4.16

    s4.16

    s4.16

    s4.16

    s4.16

    s4.16

    s4

    s4

    s4

    s4

    s4

    s4

    s4

    (b)

    SECV[mg/dl]

    factor

    (a)

    loadingvector[a.u.]

    wavelength [nm]

    factor1

    factor2

    factor3

    (c)

    regressionvector[a.u.]

    wavelength [nm]

    (d)

    SEP= 437.54 mg/dl

    CV= 98.8%

    ref

    predictionpredictedglucose[mg/dl]

    reference glucose [mg/dl]

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    9/18

    Diffuse transmittance with 1 mm thick samples (a) SECV with respect to the

    optimal number of factor, (b) Loading vector of calibration model, (c)

    Regression vector of calibration model, and (d) Prediction of glucose

    concentrations.

    0 2 4 6 8 100

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    1000 1200 1400 1600 2200 2400-0.20

    -0.15

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2200 2400-10000

    -8000

    -6000

    -4000

    -2000

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    0 200 400 600 800 1000

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    s4.16

    s4

    s4

    s4.16

    s4

    s4

    s4.16s4

    s4.08s4

    s4.16

    s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.16

    s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.16

    s4.08

    s4.08

    s4.16

    s4

    (b)

    Prediction

    1mm path length

    SEP= 24.69 mg/dl

    SECV[mg/dl]

    factor

    (a)

    loadin

    gvector[a.u.]

    wavelength [nm]

    factor1

    factor2

    factor3

    (c)

    regressionvector

    [a.u.]

    wavelength [nm]

    (d)

    predictedglucose

    [mg/dl]

    reference glucose [mg/dl]

    ref

    prediction

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    10/18

    II. Influence of red blood cell (hemoglobin) in partial

    least squares regression (PLSR) analysis

    Absorption becomes much stronger towards longer wavelengths

    Dominance of hemoglobin

    Interferences among the substances in blood or extracellular fluid

    Effect of preprocessing methods

    Biological Samples in the near infrared (1000 2500 nm)

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    11/18

    a) Whole blood spectra of

    98 samples and saline

    spectrum, b) Whole blood

    spectra are correlated

    with hemoglobin and

    glucose concentrations at

    each wavelength and

    computed correlations

    coefficients are shown.

    1200 1400 1600 1800 2200

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.01200 1400 1600 1800 2200

    0.0

    0.3

    0.6

    0.9

    1.21.5

    1.8

    2.1

    2.4

    b

    Glucose

    Hemoglobin

    correlationc

    oefficient(r)

    wavelength (nm)

    whole blood

    Saline

    1888 2044

    a

    absorbance(a.u.)

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    12/18

    What is a maximally achievable accuracy ?

    The standard error of glucose prediction was 25.5 mg/dl

    and the coefficient of variation in prediction was 11.2%.

    Kim and Yoon (2006), 11: 041128, Journal of Biomedical Optics

    15.933.8 (0.9603)213Hbmid

    35.874.2 (0.8672)207HbhighHb

    low

    21.246.9 (0.9328)221Hblow

    19.039.3 (0.9465)207HbhighHb

    mid

    22.048.7 (0.9279)221Hblow

    10.823.1 (0.9817)213HbmidHb

    high

    11.225.5 (0.9764)228HbpreHbcal

    VCPre

    c [%]SEPa (rPre

    b)mean value

    of glucosePrediction set

    Calibration

    set

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    13/18

    III. Independent Component Analysis (ICA)

    method without calibration process

    Identification of pure, or individual, absorption spectra of

    constituent components from the mixture spectra without a priori

    knowledge of the mixture.

    This method was tested with a two-component system consisting

    of aqueous solution of both glucose and sucrose, which exhibit

    distinct but closely overlapped spectra.

    ICA combined with principal component analysis was able toidentify a spectrum for each component, the correct number of

    components, and the concentrations of the components in the

    mixture. This method does not need calibration process.

    Hahn and Yoon (2006), in print, 45:32, November, Applied Optics

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    14/18

    Pure, or individual, water-subtracted absorption profiles

    of Glucose (G) and Sucrose (S)

    960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100 1120

    Absorbance

    S

    G

    Wavenumber (cm-1)

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    15/18

    25 measured mid-IR spectra for the mixtures of glucose and

    sucrose. Water absorption was subtracted to enhance the

    absorption profile of each component.

    960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100 1120

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    Absorbance

    Wavenumber(cm-1)

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    16/18

    Extracted pure-component spectra from measured IR spectra of

    25. Pure and ICA represent pure-component absorption

    spectrum and the ICA-method extracted absorption spectrum

    respectively.

    960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100 1120

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100 1120

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    ICA

    Pure

    Glucose

    Wavenumber(cm-1)

    Absorbance

    Absorbance

    ICA

    Pure

    Sucrose

    Wavenumber(cm-1)

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    17/18

    Scatter plot for the reference concentrations and ICs from

    measured mid-IR spectra

    1 2 3 4 50

    1

    2

    3

    4

    1 2 3 4 5

    -11

    -10

    -9

    -8

    IC1(a.u.)

    IC2(a.u.)

    Sucrose (a.u.)

    Glucose(a.u.)

  • 8/14/2019 Biophysics GYoon

    18/18

    Measurement geometry or setup loading factor analysis

    can provide actual contribution of wavelength in prediction

    Dominant absorber such as RBC(hemoglobin) and water in

    near infrared effect substantially. A proper care is needed.

    A new method that does not require no concentration

    information and calibration process is introduced.

    Summary in Spectroscopic analysis