46
Biogeographic regions • Sclater • Wallace • Sclater-Wallace System

Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Biogeographic regions

• Sclater

• Wallace

• Sclater-Wallace System

Page 2: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Why might birds be less useful than other taxonomic groups when determining biogeographic regions?

Page 3: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Biogeographic regions

• 1. Nearctic—N. America including about 2/3 of Mexico and Greenland

• 2. Palearctic—Europe, northern Africa, and northern Asia--Nearctic and the Palearctic make up the Holarctic

• 3. Neotropical—lower 1/3 of Mexico, Central and South America

• 4. Ethiopian or African—Sub-Saharan Africa, adjacent Arabian Peninsula

• 5. Oriental—Indian subcontinent and adjacent regions of southern Asia

• 6. Australian—Includes Australia, Tasmania, New Guinea, and New Zealand.

Page 4: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Wallace’s line—demarcation of boundary between the Oriental and Australian biogeographic regions

Page 5: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Biogeographic boundaries between the Palearctic and the Ethiopian regions and the Nearctic and Neotropical are similarly difficult to locate

Page 6: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Important factors that have lead to distinctive biogeographic regions

• Present biogeographic barriers

• Plate tectonics

• Evolutionary history of families

Page 7: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Present barriers influence the numbers and types of organisms that can disperse

between regions• Deserts, for example the Sahara and the

Sonoran

Page 8: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Present barriers

• Bodies of water, for example the oceans, the Bering Strait, water channels in the Malay archipelago

Page 9: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Present barriers

• Mountain ranges like the Himalayas

Page 10: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Geographic range--area where a species (or higher taxonomic group) is located

Page 11: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Types of range maps

• Dot maps• Outline maps• Contour maps

Page 12: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

How do biologists determine if a species inhabits a region?

• Visual surveys

• Vocalization surveys

• Trapping organisms

• Fecal pellets

• Tracks

• Other animal-related signs

Page 13: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Historical ranges?

• Museum records

• Publications

Page 14: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Contour maps include information about density

Page 15: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Terms

• Size of a population

• Abundance of individuals

• Density of a population

Page 16: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Sampling

Act, process, or technique of selecting a representative part of a population (or location) for the purpose of determining parameters or characteristics of the whole population (or all locations).

Page 17: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Random sampling

Key is that each individual (or location) in the population (or area) have an equal chance of being sampled.

Page 18: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Without random sampling, individuals (or locations) measured are not representative of the whole population (or area) but of only a part of the population (or area).For example, if one samples only along roads, and roads tend to be poor-quality habitat, density estimates may not reflect density in higher-quality habitats

Page 19: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Sometimes poor-quality habitat will have higher densities than higher-quality habitat and sometimes lower

• Individuals in poor-quality habitat may weigh less (be in worse condition) than individuals in higher-quality habitat

Page 20: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• So, non-random sampling may bias your results.

• Bias is the systematic distortion of a statistic (like population abundance) because of sampling technique

• The direction of the bias depends on the variable you are interested in (density, weight) and the organisms/system you are studying.

Page 21: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Stratified random sampling

The study population (or area) is divided into nonoverlapping strata or areas, and samples are selected from each stratum or area independently

Page 22: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Think carefully about the question before designing a study. If you want a relatively unbiased estimate of the density of deer in Michigan’s LP, consider stratified random sampling over the whole LP. If you want to compare densities of deer in coniferous and deciduous woodlands, then sample is those two habitat types.

Page 23: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

To determine density of individuals per unit area

• Frequency of abundance along transects or in quadrats

• Trapping organisms

• Counting fecal pellets

• Vocalization frequencies

• Percentage ground cover

Page 24: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Other techniques

• Pelt records

• Catch-per unit effort

• Feeding damage

• Visual counts of organisms in a standardized method

Page 25: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Examples

• Desert tortoises

• Freshwater mussels

Page 26: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Sampling problems

• Individuals at low density

• Reduced activity during drought conditions

• Often in underground burrows

• Young are very hard to find

• Inter-observer differences in sampling

Page 27: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Sampling scheme

• Two 1 mile squared plots searched

• One plot searched 5 times, one 2 times

• Observers walked slowly through plots, on parallel transects, and marked encountered tortoises

• About 70 person days required to sample each plot

Page 28: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Plot 1—each new tortoise detected required 10.4 hours of searching

• Plot 2—each new tortoise detected required 12.6 hours of searching

Page 29: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Investigators used computer simulations to determine whether population size estimates from 1 mile squared plots, 1 km squared plots, and 0.25 km squared plots, were reasonable, that is, did they have small variance?

• Population estimates must be made from data because data do not represent actual numbers of tortoises

Page 30: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Simulations showed that estimates from 1-km squared plots were similar to those from 1-mi squared plots. Estimates from 0.25km squared plots were overestimates.

• All estimates had high levels of variability • Plot 1 estimate—43.24 tortoises/km2 ±

4.40 (37-54 Confidence Interval)• Plot 2 estimate—35.52 tortoises/km2 ±

5.02 (28-48 Confidence Interval)

Page 31: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Conclusions

• Current sampling methods are inadequate

• Much more effort should be expended to find adequate numbers of tortoises to adequately estimate population densities with smaller confidence intervals

Page 32: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Other issues

• Did not use random sampling of locations so population estimates are specific to the sites where they sampled

Page 33: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Impetus for study

• Zebra mussel infestation has led to declines of native mussels in many areas

Page 34: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Lake St. Clair

• Maximum natural depth—6.5 m

• Muddy sand at bottom of middle of lake

• Gravel and sand at bottom near shore of lake

Page 35: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Random sampling not used

• 90 sites sampled

• Sampling techniques used:

1m2 quadrats with divers using SCUBA

Ekman grabs from boats

Sampling by divers in concentric circles around detected native mussels

Page 36: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Native mussels not found in western sites

• 22 species found at 33 sites in eastern sites

• Freshwater mussels detected in shallow waters with firm (gravel/sand) substrates and in marshy bays with soft muddey substrates

Page 37: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

• Zebra mussels may not like shallow waters with greater wave action

Page 38: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Issues with study

• Without random sampling, results can’t be applied to whole lake or other lakes in area

• The results can suggest patterns that investigators can study further.

Page 39: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Center vs. periphery of geographic ranges

• Environmental conditions assumed to be better at center than periphery of a species’ range

Page 40: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

General patterns

• Populations denser (less isolated) within range center

• Populations less variable in size over time within range center

• Populations have greater genetic diversity within range center

Page 41: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

It has been expected that peripheral populations are more susceptible to

extinction than central populations because• Small size makes them susceptible to

demographic stochasticity

• Less likely to experience rescue effect

• More susceptible to genetic drift

• Less raw material for natural selection

Page 42: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Rescue effect

• Individuals from large, source populations sometimes disperse to smaller, more isolated populations and so “rescue” those populations from extinction

Page 43: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

However, range collapse often occurs at center, not periphery of

range• Giant panda

• Red wolf

• Black-footed ferret

• California condor

• American burying beetle

• Several Australian mammals

Page 44: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Contagion hypothesis

• Contagions (anthropogenic disturbances) impact most isolated populations last

Page 45: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Examples of contagions

• Habitat degradation

• Introduced species

• Contamination

• Xerification

Page 46: Biogeographic regions Sclater Wallace Sclater-Wallace System

Is periphery of range better place for species’ re-introductions?

• Benefits

• Costs