BIBLIOGRAPHIE L'Open Source comme méthodologie de ...

  • Published on
    08-Dec-2016

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Transcript

  • BIBLIOGRAPHIE

    LOpen Source comme mthodologie de dveloppement

    Entre en matire

    INRIA DTI Stratgie de lINRIA sur le logiciel libre, 14 juin 2009http://www.inria.fr/valorisation/Strategie-inria-logiciel-libre.pdfLe logiciel libre est devenu un fait incontournable de ldition logicielle, que ce soit dans le monde acadmique, dans lindustrie et les services et, au del, dans lensemble de la socit. LINRIA, acteur national de la recherche et du transfert dans les sciences numriques, souhaite, par cette prise de position, raffirmer son soutien cette dynamique quil juge indispensable au dveloppement de la socit numrique de la connaissance. Le logiciel libre est un objet complexe qui recouvre plusieurs dimensions aux logiques ventuellement contradictoires (vecteur de la diffusion scientifique et objet de recherche, vecteur du transfert technologique et objet industriel). Dans ce contexte, pour des logiciels dvelopps lINRIA, le choix du logiciel libre doit tre mrement pes et doit sinscrire dans la recherche de la stratgie qui maximisera limpact sur la socit, notamment par le transfert. Ceci passe par la capacit caractriser les situations logicielles et conforter la professionnalisation des pratiques.

    Quelques dfinitions

    Open source http://www.opensource.org/

    La dsignation Open Source, "source ouverte" en franais ou code source libre, s'applique aux logiciels dont la licence respecte des critres prcisment tablis par lOpen Source Initiative, c'est--dire la possibilit de libre redistribution, d'accs au code source et de travaux drivs. On qualifie souvent un logiciel libre d'Open Source, car les licences compatibles Open Source englobent les licences libres selon la dfinition de la FSF (Free Software Foundation). Le terme Open Source est en concurrence avec le terme Free Software. Le terme Freeware dsigne des logiciels gratuits qui ne sont ni ncessairement ouverts, ni libres. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source

    FLOSS : Free/Libre Open Source Software

    L'expression Free/Libre and Open Source Software, abrge en FLOSS, qualifie la fois les logiciels libres et les logiciels open source, les deux grands mouvements soutenus respectivement par la FSF.et lOSI. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free/Libre_Open_Source_Software

    Bibliographie de lICSE en ligne

    Bibliography for the International Conferences on Software Engineering (ICSE) http://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/SE/ICSE.html

    http://www.opensource.org/http://www.inria.fr/valorisation/Strategie-inria-logiciel-libre.pdfhttp://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/SE/ICSE.htmlhttp://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free/Libre_Open_Source_Softwarehttp://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source

  • International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)- Bibliography DBLPhttp://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icse/index.html

    Le coin des spcialistes

    Ouvrages

    Deek, F., McHugh, J. Open Source : technology & policy ; CUP, 2008.

    Meeker, Heather J., The open source alternative : understanding risks and leveraging opportunities, Wiley, 2008. Three different domains - technology, law and business - intersect in the world of open source software and Meeker's book manages to address each of the three at an expert level while still synthesizing the larger issues relevant to everyone in the field. While the topic of open source has generated a flood of commentary, the type of careful and reasoned analysis offered in this book is in short supply and makes The Open Source Alternative stand apart from similar recent offerings. [consultable lINRIA Grenoble Rhne-Alpes]

    Lessig, L. Code [Texte imprim] : version 2.0, Basic books, 2006 . There's a common belief that cyberspace cannot be regulated-that it is, in its very essence, immune from the government's (or anyone else's) control. Code, first published in 2000, argues that this belief is wrong. It is not in the nature of cyberspace to be unregulable; cyberspace has no "nature." It only has code-the software and hardware that make cyberspace what it is. That code can create a place of freedom-as the original architecture of the Net did-or a place of oppressive control. Under the influence of commerce, cyberpsace is becoming a highly regulable space, where behavior is much more tightly controlled than in real space. But that's not inevitable either. We can-we must-choose what kind of cyberspace we want and what freedoms we will guarantee. These choices are all about architecture: about what kind of code will govern cyberspace, and who will control it. In this realm, code is the most significant form of law, and it is up to lawyers, policymakers, and especially citizens to decide what values that code embodies. [consultable lINRIA Rh Alpes]

    Du mme auteur, accessible en ligne voir aussi Codev2 http://codev2.cc/

    Muffatto, M. Open source : a multidisciplinary approach, Imperial college Press, 2006.

    Feller, J. Perspectives on free and open source software, MIT Press, 2005. What is the status of the Free and Open Source Software (F/OSS) revolution? Has the creation of software that can be freely used, modified, and redistributed transformed industry and society, as some predicted, or is this transformation still a work in progress? Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software brings together leading analysts and researchers to address this question, examining specific aspects of F/OSS in a way that is both scientifically rigorous and highly relevant to real-life managerial and technical concerns.

    Fogel, K. Producing open source software : how to to run a successful free software project, OReilly, 2005. The corporate market is now embracing free, "open source" software like never before, as evidenced by the recent success of the technologies underlying LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP). Each is the result of a publicly collaborative process among numerous developers who volunteer their time and energy to create better software. [consultable lINRIA Grenoble Rhne-Alpes]

    St Laurent, A. Understanding open source & free software licensing , OReilly, 2004. In his book, Andrew M. St. Laurent attempts to help readers understand the variations and complexities involved in deciding what kind of licensing model to apply to software being developed and how to understand the complexities and requirements of open source and free software licensing that someone may want to use and incorporate in software packages being developed for internal use and/or external distribution. [consultable lINRIA Grenoble Rhne-Alpes]

    http://codev2.cc/http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icse/index.html

  • William, S. Free as in Freedom, OReilly & Associates, 2002. In 1984, Richard Stallman launched the GNU Project for the purpose of developing a complete UNIX-like operating system that would allow for free software use. What he developed was the GNU operating system. (GNU is a recursive acronym for "GNU's Not UNIX,'' and it is pronounced guh-NEW. Linux is a variant of the GNU operating system.) This biography traces the evolution of Stallman's eccentric genius from gifted child to teen outcast to passionate crusader for free software.

    Feller, J.Fitzgerald, B, Raymond E. Understanding open source software development, Addison-Wesley/ Pearson, 2002.

    Raymond, E. The cathedral and the bazaar : musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary, OReilly, 2001. It may be foolish to consider Eric Raymond's recent collection of essays, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, the most important computer programming thinking to follow the Internet revolution. But it would be more unfortunate to overlook the implications and long-term benefits of his fastidious description of open-source software development considering the growing dependence businesses and economies have on emerging computer technologies.

    DiBona, C. Ockman, S. Stone, M. Open sources : voices from the open source revolution; OReilly, 1999. Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution is a fascinating look at the raging debate that is its namesake. Filled with writings from the central players--from Linux creator Linus Torvalds to Perl creator Larry Wall--the book convinces the reader of the overwhelming merits of freeing up the many iterations of software's source code [consultable lINRIA Sophia Antipolis]

    Chapitres douvrage

    Dengya Zhu, Vidyasagar Potdar and Elizabeth Chang : Open Source Software Development (OSSD) Based On Software Engineering , IFIP International federation for Information Processing, Springer, vol. 203, pp. 345-346, 2006. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p472644k75gkq23h/fulltext.pdf [accessible depuis lINRIA]

    Stefan Koch, Agile Principles and Open Source Software Development: A Theoretical and Empirical Discussion, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 85-93, 2004. http://www.springerlink.com/content/19kqmpf1kwtp55v3/fulltext.pdf [accessible depuis lINRIA]

    Thses

    Barcellini, F. Conception de l'artefact, conception du collectif: dynamique d'un processus de conception ouvert et continu dans une communaut de dveloppement de logiciels libres . Thses. Conservatoire national des arts et mtiers - CNAM (28/11/2008), Franoise Dtienne (Dir.) - http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00350212/fr/

    Tariq, Muhammad, Quality of the Open Source Software University essay from Blekinge Tekniska Hgskola/Sektionen fr Teknik (TEK), 2008. http://www.essays.se/essay/8d4d54ac60/

    Bronner, Mathias, Measuring the Usage of Open Source Software, University essay from IT -universitetet i Gteborg/Tillmpad informationsteknologi. 2007. http://www.essays.se/essay/7278a077ce/

    Druel, F. valuation de la valeur l're du web : Proposition de modle de valorisation des projets non marchands Thses. Universit d'Angers (14/11/2007), Simon RICHIR (Dir.) http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00346337/fr/

    Articles

    Franois Letellier, Open Source Software: the Role of Nonprofits in Federating Business and Innovation Ecosystems, AFME , janvier 2008. http://flet.netcipia.net/xwiki/bin/download/Main/publications-fr/GEM2008-FLetellier-

    http://flet.netcipia.net/xwiki/bin/download/Main/publications-fr/GEM2008-FLetellier-SubmittedPaper.pdfhttp://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00346337/fr/http://www.essays.se/essay/7278a077ce/http://www.essays.se/essay/8d4d54ac60/http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00350212/fr/http://www.springerlink.com/content/19kqmpf1kwtp55v3/fulltext.pdfhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/p472644k75gkq23h/fulltext.pdfhttp://opac.inria.fr/search~S12*frf?/aStone%2C+Mark/astone+mark/-3,-1,0,B/browsehttp://opac.inria.fr/search~S12*frf?/aOckman%2C+Sam/aockman+sam/-3,-1,0,B/browsehttp://opac.inria.fr/search~S12*frf?/aDiBona%2C+Chris/adibona+chris/-3,-1,0,B/browse

  • SubmittedPaper.pdf Due to its function as a key enabling technology for the information society and to its compliance with open standards, infrastructure software is quickly commoditized. Its market therefore evolves to natural monopolies faster than markets for tangible goods. The success of free/libre/open-source software, originally created for ethical reasons, may be explained by interpreting it as a new paradigm which provides effective answers to the structural flaws of the market. Now that mainstream industry players realize how much economical sense this approach makes, they investigate new business and innovation models. In this context, business-neutral meta-organizations federating vendors, customers and governmental agencies shall target the sustainable development of business ecosystems where stakeholders, widely spread across various geographic and cultural environments, develop beneficial strategies in line with their business and societal requirements. Real world experience from new generation F/L/OSS communities confirm this vision and suggest some balanced principles for their management and governance."

    Karl Toth, Experiences with Open Source Software engineering tools., IEEE Software, nov.dc. 2006 (vol. 23 no. 6) pp. 44-52, 2006. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=04012623 [accessible depuis lINRIA]For software engineering (SE) and computer science (CS) programs to deliver on their promises, they must go beyond teaching students about principles, processes, models, and strategies and offer them realistic, practical experience as well. Although industry has been pressing to increase the emphasis on practical aspects, many CS programs continue to give students relatively simple problems focused on selected computing and software concepts and theories

    Ruben van Wendel de Joode, Yuwei Lin and Shay David, Rethinking free, libre and open source software in Knowledge, technology & Policy, pp. 5-16, Springer, 2006. http://www.springerlink.com/content/0tykrgwvenu3tdqh/fulltext.pdf [accessible depuis lINRIA]

    von Krogh. G , Spaeth S ,Lakhani K. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study in Research Policy 32 (2003) 12171241. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/rp-vonkroghspaethlakhani.pdfThis paper develops an inductive theory of the open source software (OSS) innovation process by focussing on the creation of Freenet, a project aimed at developing a decentralized and anonymous peer-to-peer electronic file sharing network. We are particularly interested in the strategies and processes by which newpeople join the existing community of software developers, and how they initially contribute code. Analyzing data from multiple sources on the Freenet software development process, we generate the constructs of joining script, specialization, contribution barriers, and feature gifts, and propose relationships among these. Implications for theory and research are discussed.

    Franois Letellier, Le logiciel libre selon ObjectWeb : une logique d'cosystme in le Journal du Net, 15 octobre 2004. http://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/0410/041015_tribune.shtmlLa stratgie du consortium repose sur un constat : le libre n'est pas un produit, mais un processus. Pour qu'il apporte un plus technologique, ce processus doit permettre l'implication progressive de nouveaux acteurs.

    Laurent Charles, Manuel Vacelet, Mohamed Chaari, Miguel Santana, STMicroelectronics, SDS : Une infrastructure d'installation de logiciels libres pour des organisations multi-sites.DECOR04, Dploiement et (Re) Configuration de Logicielshttp://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/02/75/37/PDF/04.pdf Les dveloppements logiciels sur les systmes UNIX font de plus en plus appel aux logiciels libres. Nous proposons une solution de dploiement et de contrle de ces logiciels libres au sein dune grande organisation. Nous nous attachons particulirement rsoudre les problmes lis au dploiement multi-sites ainsi qu la gestion de configuration de ces dploiements. Loriginalit de notre approche repose sur sa capacit tre mise en oeuvre et contrle par les utilisateurs plutt que par les administrateurs, sans ncessiter dexpertise particulire, et par les possibilits de dploiement dans des environnements htrognes.

    Laurent Charles, Logiciels libres pour organisations multis...