Benthic Macroinvertebrate Study - London, Ontario · The Dingman Creek benthic macroinvertebrate study was undertaken by the City of London, Environmental & Engineering Services Department

1

City Of London

Environmental and Engineering Services Department

Wastewater Treatment Operations

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Study

Dingman Creek

August 2013

Prepared by: Jessica Lompart and Tara McCowan

Revised June 2014 by: Miranda Gregorio

2

Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Benthic Macroinvertebrates ......................................................................................... 4 3.0 Water Quality Indicators ............................................................................................... 6

3.1 The Stonefly ............................................................................................................. 6 3.2 The Mayfly ................................................................................................................ 6 3.3 The Caddisfly ........................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Indicator Species Summary ...................................................................................... 7

4.0 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 8 5.0 Research Materials (Field and Laboratory Work) ....................................................... 12

5.1 Method ................................................................................................................... 12 5.2 Materials and Apparatus......................................................................................... 13 5.3 The Eckman Sampler ............................................................................................. 14 5.4 Procedure ............................................................................................................... 15

6.0 Field Observations ..................................................................................................... 16 6.1 Old Victoria - Site #1 .............................................................................................. 16 6.2 Highbury - Site #2 ................................................................................................... 19 6.3 Green Valley Road - Site #3 ................................................................................... 22 6.4 Green Lane - Site #4 .............................................................................................. 24 6.5 White Oak Road - Site #5 ....................................................................................... 27 6.6 Wonderland Road - Site #6 .................................................................................... 30 6.7 Colonel Talbot Road - Site #7 ................................................................................ 33 6.8 Lambeth - Site #8 ................................................................................................... 36

7.0 Additional Statistical Analysis ..................................................................................... 39 8.0 Results Tables and Graphs........................................................................................ 41 9.0 Water Quality Observations ....................................................................................... 45 10.0 Observations and Conclusions ................................................................................ 46 11.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................... 48 12.0 Sampling Locations of Dingman Creek .................................................................... 51 Appendix A: Benthic Survey Field Notes ......................................................................... 52 Appendix B: Quantitative Data Sheets ............................................................................. 75

3

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Invertebrates Study Overview

The Dingman Creek benthic macroinvertebrate study was undertaken by the City of London, Environmental & Engineering Services Department. Benthic sampling is a biological method of studying bottom dwelling aquatic organisms that can determine water quality. The diversity of aquatic species found livings on the creek beds are sampled. The Eckman sampling technique was suited for the slow flow and soft bottom of Dingman Creek and was used to collect the samples for this study.

The City of London's primary objective in conducting benthic macroinvertebrates sampling is to quantitatively and qualitatively benchmark aquatic life forms of Dingman Creek. The Hilsenhoff's Family Biotic Index (FBI), Simpson's Index (Si) and Shannon’s Diversity Index (H’) were used in the report for data analysis. The results from the data analysis were used to assess the water quality.

4

2.0 Benthic Macroinvertebrates

2.1 Definition

Benthic macroinvertebrates are small organisms inhabiting the bottom of streams, rivers and lakes. They may roam freely over rocks and organic debris, or live in constructed cases, tubes, or nets attached to rocks during all or part of their life cycle.

Macroinvertebrates have no backbone. They are retained on a U.S. standard No. 30 sieve (0.595 mm openings) (Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 22nd Edition). Included among the macroinvertebrates are nemertea (worms, flatworms), gastropoda (snails), pelecypoda (clams, mussels), plecoptera (stoneflies), ephemeroptera (mayflies), trichoptera (caddisflies) and diptera (flies, mosquito larva, and midges).

The composition and density of macroinvertebrate communities in streams, rivers and lakes, are reasonably stable from year to year in undisturbed environments. Seasonal fluctuations associated with life cycle dynamics of individual organisms may result in extreme variations at specific sites within any year.

Most aquatic habitats, particularly free flowing waters with acceptable water quality and substrate conditions are able to support diverse macroinvertebrate communities. In this case, a reasonably balanced distribution of families and their genus among the total number of individuals is present.

Macroinvertebrate communities respond to changing habitat quality by adjustments in their community structure. Many large rivers with acceptable water quality are dominated by a particular invertebrate. Small changes in their relative numbers may not be indicative of changes in water quality.

5

2.2 Environmental Impact

Macroinvertebrate communities respond to environmental changes and are useful in assessing the impact of municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastes on water bodies. Changes in macroinvertebrate communities can be caused by organic loading (the increase of organic materials causing low dissolved oxygen levels), substrate alteration, and toxic chemicals.

Organic pollution may cause low diversities in macroinvertebrate communities, as more sensitive species die off and tolerant species dominate, or even thrive. Organic pollution results in a decreased number of sensitive invertebrates and an increase in tolerant species. Siltation and toxic chemical pollution may not only reduce, but eliminate the entire macroinvertebrate community from the affected area.

Not all cases conform to those described above because conditions may be mediated by other environmental and biological factors. Assessing the impact of a pollution sources generally involves comparison of macroinvertebrate communities, and their habitats at sites influenced by pollution, with those collected from adjacent unaffected sites.

Using macroinvertebrates as an indicator is beneficial since they are generally stationary and inhabit areas suitable for their survival. They can also be used to locate a pollution source. This typically involves sampling and analyzing communities and then determining whether the presumed pollution affected community differs from an unaffected one.

The basic information required for bottom fauna analyses is an identification and count of the individual organisms. From the data, the communities can be characterized and compared according to community structure, biomass, and diversity. Other water quality indicators such as dissolved oxygen concentration, pH, water depth, algae cover, and sediment type are equally important.

6

3.0 Water Quality Indicators

3.1 The Stonefly

The stonefly or Plecoptera, are terrestrial insects but are not found very far from running waters. The adults are primitive in structure and have poor flight ability. The emerging nymphs and adults are readily spotted on the stones surrounding the river, thus earning their name. Emergence usually occurs during late winter or early spring. The nymphs are aquatic, but do resemble their adult relatives.

The nymphs range in length from 6 to 50 mm and can range in colour from yellow, tan brown or black. The stonefly nymph is sluggish and can usually be found in masses of leaves or under stones in unpolluted streams. In general, they are found only where high levels of oxygen exist. Many stoneflies are carnivores feeding mainly on mayfly nymphs and diptera larvae. The nymph stage lasts one to three years. The stonefly nymph is a major source of food for trout.

3.2 The Mayfly

The mayfly or Ephemeroptera, are widely distributed throughout the world. Different types of mayflies may be found in standing or running waters. A dissolved oxygen level of at least 2 to 5 mg/L is needed to support mayfly life.

Mayfly eggs are usually deposited on the water surface in clusters. The eggs then sink to the bottom of the river where they stick to rocks. In the Baetis species, the female crawls beneath the water and lays the eggs on the river bottom.

After the eggs hatch, the mayfly spends three to six months in the water before emerging as an adult. At this stage the insects are called nymphs. The nymphs are mainly herbivores, feeding on plant material and some animal material. A mayfly nymph can easily be distinguished by its three tails (cerci) and its ten segment abdomen.

During the adult stage the male mayflies gather in large swarms. The female mayflies enter the swarm to choose a male partner for breeding. The adult stage usually lasts only three or four days.

7

3.3 The Caddisfly

The caddisfly or Trichoptera is a relatively small order of insects widely distributed throughout the world. Adult caddisflies are small, brown or grey moth-like insects and are active mainly at night. Larval caddisflies live only in water.

Caddisfly larvae produce special cases that are made of debris fastened by a silk web, this increases their respiration efficiency. Many of the net-spinning species build a fixed retreat or shelter in which the larva lies while food particles are collected from the current by its silken capture net. These retreat-makers are filter feeders and their food includes small fragments of plant and animal material, invertebrate feces and algal cells.

Most caddisflies complete one generation each year, passing through five larval stages, a pupal stage, and a winged adult stage. The time required for completion of the actual metamorphosis, i.e. the emergence of adult from the pupal skin, is generally three weeks.

3.4 Indicator Species Summary

Stoneflies are found in pristine cold running waters in masses of leaves or under stones. Stoneflies are good indicators of excellent water conditions while mayflies and caddisflies are indicators of good water conditions. In general, stoneflies are found only where high levels of oxygen exist. Mayflies and caddisflies are found in running or standing waters with oxygen levels at least 2 to 5 mg/L.

Stoneflies have been found previously in 2010 at the Old Victoria and Highbury locations. Benthic sampling conducted in 2011 and 2012 showed no presence of Stoneflies in any of the sampling locations.

8

4.0 Data Analysis

4.1 Hilsenhoff's Family Biotic Index, Simpson’s Indices and Shannon’s Diversity Index

Benthic data was analyzed using Hilsenhoff's Family Biotic Index (FBI), Simpson's Indices of Taxa Richness, Diversity and Evenness and Shannon’s Diversity Index.

Hilsenhoff's FBI (Hilsenhoff 1988) consists of each taxon being assigned a pollution tolerance value (Table 1). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being the least pollution tolerant and 10 being the most tolerant. Taxa found in the sample were used to calculate a weighted FBI value that provides an indication of water quality for each site (see Table 1). To calculate the FBI value, the number of individuals found in each taxon is multiplied by the assigned pollution tolerance value and the sum of these products is then divided by the total number of individuals found in the sample.

The FBI rating system was updated in 2011. Changes were made to the assigned pollution tolerance values for some taxa. This change means that the 2012 and 2013 FBI data will be comparable to 2011 but will not be comparable to previous years, however; it is a more accurate assessment of water quality.

Taxa Diversity measures the richness and abundance of taxa in a community, Taxa Diversity, D, was calculated as:

∑

In this equation, S is the total number of taxa found, and Pi is the number of individuals in a specific taxa divided by the total number of individuals in the sample. Taxa Richness is a measure of the number of different taxa present in the sample whereas abundance measures the total number of individuals of that taxa in the sample. A balanced and stable community is represented by a large diversity value approaching unity. Diversity can never be smaller than 1/S, S equaling the total number of taxa found, which occurs when all taxa are equally abundant.

Taxa Evenness, E, measures the relative abundance of each taxon amongst the taxa within a sample.

Taxa Evenness was calculated as:

In this equation, D is the taxa diversity calculated from the above equation and S is the total number of taxa found (richness). Evenness is measured on a scale of 0 to 1; as the

9

value approaches 1, the relative abundance of each taxa is evenly distributed representing a ‘good’ evenness. Taxa evenness approaching 0 is ‘poor’, representing a sample dominated by a small number of taxa.

Shannon’s Diversity Index (H’) is an index used to measure the diversity of the sampled benthic community. It takes into account both richness and evenness of the taxa present.

Shannon’s diversity, H’, was calculated as:

H’ = ∑

Pi is the number of individuals in a specific taxa divided by the total number of individuals in the sample. Pi is calculated and multiplied by the natural logarithm of Pi, the product is summed for all taxa and multiplied by negative 1.

10

Table 1: Hilsenhoff's Pollution Tolerance Values for Calculating FBI

Taxonomic Name Common Names Pollution Tolerance Value

Elmidae Riffle Beetle 4

Psephenidae Waterpenny Beetle 4

Gammaridae Scud 4

Helobdella Leech 9

Sphaeriidae Fingernail Clam 7

Corixidae Water Boatman 5

Chironomidae Midge 6

Ceratopogonidae Biting Midge 6

Ephemeroptera Mayfly 4

Oligochaeta Aquatic Worm 8

Nematoda Thread Worm 8

Asellidae Sowbug 8

Prosobranch Gilled Snail 6

Pulmonate Lunged Snail 8

Decapoda Crayfish 6

Chloroperlidae Stone Fly 1

Sialidae Alder Fly 4

Hydropsychidae Caddisfly 4

Tipulidae Crane Fly 3

Simuliidae Black fly 6

Planaria Flatworm 4

Anisoptera Dragonfly 3

Arachnida Water Mites 6

Tabanidae Horsefly/Deerfly 6

Corydalidae Dobsonfly 4

Zygoptera Damselfly 5

Stratiomyidae Soldierfly 7

Hydrometridae Water Measurer 5

Gerridae Water Strider 5

Lepydoptera Pyralid 5

Hydrophilidae Water Scavenger 4

Ephydridae Brine fly 6

Helophorus Beetle 5

Haliplidae Crawling Beetle 5

Dytiscidae Predaceous Diving Beetle 5

Haliplidae Predaceous Water Beetle 5

Dytiscidae Diving Beetle 5

Empididae Dancefly 6

Hydrophilidae Water Scavenger Beetle 5

Athericidae Snipefly 4

11

*The family biotic index list was updated accordingly.

Table 2: Evaluation of Water Quality using the Family-Level Biotic Index

Family Biotic Index Water Quality Degree of Organic Pollution

0.00-3.75 Excellent Organic pollution unlikely

3.76-4.25 Very Good Possible slight organic pollution

4.26-5.00 Good Some organic pollution probable

5.01-5.75 Fair Fairly substantial pollution likely

5.76-6.50 Fairly Poor Substantial pollution likely

6.50-7.25 Poor Very substantial pollution likely

7.26-10.00 Very Poor Severe organic pollution likely

(Hilsenhoff 1988)

(1997-98 UTRCA Benthic Sampling Data)

(2005. R. Fox, Lander University)

(2006 Soil & Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax)

(ZEAS 2008)

(2010 Soil and Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax

(1993 Melvin. C. Zimmerman, Lycoming College)

(2002 Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Freshwater, S.M. Mandaville)

(2006-2007 East Interlake Conservation District Data Report, Winnipeg)

(2005 Parvin Branch and Tarkin Branch Watershed Restoration Master Plan, Citizens United)

(Storm water Effects Handbook, G. Allen Burton, Jr and Robert E. Pitt Lewis Publishers, 2001-appendix B Benthic Community Assessment)

(IDNR division of fish and wildlife lake and river enhancement program)- http://monitoringprotocols.pbworks.com

12

5.0 Research Materials (Field and Laboratory Work)

5.1 Method

The initial stages of the project involved planning the order of work to be done and conducting preliminary research. Information was compiled using previous studies prepared by The City of London, MOE, and Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.

Research involved becoming familiar with the types of organisms which lived in and on the river and streams to be sampled. The correlation between certain species and water quality was determined using the Internet and other sources provided by professionals in the field.

An Eckman sampling method was used in this study since it is recommended for areas with a soft creek bed and no riffles.

In order to undertake the inventory of benthic macroinvertebrate samples, a checklist was devised. The criterion included stream width, depth, substrate, water clarity; macrophytes, algae cover, and bank vegetation (see Field Notes for each individual site).

13

5.2 Materials and Apparatus

1 Eckman sampler

2 Tweezers

1 Sieve bottom bucket

1 Large Sieve

1 Small Sieve

2 Chest waders

3 Large plastic bottles

2 Squirt bottles (rinsing)

2 White tubs

1 Laboratory sample bottle

1 Portable Dissolved Oxygen meter

1 pH meter

2 Petri dishes

85% ethanol alcohol

Glass vials with lids

Masking tape

Field note templates

Thermometer

Digital camera

14

5.3 The Eckman Sampler

An Eckman Sampler, or stream bottom sampler, is designed to collect insects, larva and other aquatic life forms for the purpose of water quality analysis. The Eckman Sampler was used in this study because Dingman Creek has very low water flow, a soft creek bed, with no riffle areas. The sampler was placed on the creek bed with its claws opened and pressed firmly into the sediment. The release catch was depressed, allowing the claws to close. Once the claws closed, the sampler was lifted out of the water and emptied into the screen-bottom bucket for washing. The sample was then rinsed into a large plastic jar and sealed. Sorting, identifying, and preserving the samples took place at the Greenway laboratory on the same day as the samples were collected. If sample sorting could not be done on the day of collection, samples were refrigerated at 4oC overnight.

15

5.4 Procedure

A total of 7 locations were sampled across the City of London. Three samples were taken at each site, one near the bridge, one upstream and one downstream of this location. While sites were sometimes chosen near the stream bank, an effort was made to choose sites that would always be submerged, even during dry periods. Invertebrates collected were then counted, placed in individual vials containing ethanol alcohol, identified on a taxonomic level and labeled.

16

6.0 Field Observations

6.1 Old Victoria - Site #1

This location was the most easterly of all the Dingman Creek sites, located at Old Victoria Road and Dingman Drive. Agriculture dominated the surrounding land use with corn fields bordering the creek on either side. The riparian vegetation included tall grasses, mature trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation. When sampling occurred the creek depth was higher than 2012 levels due to recent rainfall. The creek has a low flow rate at this location and the substrate varied from rocks, gravel, pebbles and twigs. A foamy scum substance was found downstream from the bridge. There was a buffer constructed along either side of the creek due to Old Victoria Bridge being recently rebuilt.

A taxa richness of 7 was observed this year, a decrease from 9 in 2012. The dominant taxon found in 2013 was caddisfly larvae composing of 40.0% of the total taxa which differs from previous years having dominant taxa of midges. The Family Biotic Index was 5.54 (Fair), an increase from 6.25 (Fairly poor) in 2012.

Upstream 3-June-2013

17

Downstream 3-June-2013

Bridge 3-June-2013

18

0

5

10

15

20

25

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Taxa

Ric

hn

ess

Year

Old Victoria Taxa Richness 1999 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

Old Victoria Family Biotic Index 1999 - 2013

19

6.2 Highbury - Site #2

This site is located at the intersection of Highbury Avenue at Dingman Drive. The area is primarily agricultural with a few residences including a cattle farm located on the eastern side of Highbury Avenue. The creek bed was rich in organic matter, mud, tree roots and sand. Algae were located along the banks of the creek and attached to some large boulders. Submergent macrophytes in the creek consisted of seaweed as well as emergent macrophytes such as grasses and reeds. In the late summer months the creek became overgrown with macrophytes. The water clarity at this sampling location was moderate.

The taxa richness this year was found to be 17, an increase from 2012 having a value of 12. The dominant taxon for 2013 was midge larvae representing 40.2% of the total taxa which differs from 2012 which had a dominant taxon of aquatic worms. The FBI value was calculated as 7.56 (Very Poor) a decrease from the 2013 rating of 7.26 (Poor).


20


Bridge 5-June-2013

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Taxa

Ric

hn

ess

Year

Highbury Taxa Richness 1999 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

Highbury Family Boitic Index 1999 - 2013

22

6.3 Green Valley Road - Site #3

This site is located off of Green Valley Road. An industrial area is present to the north where an open storm sewer drains south into Dingman Creek. The creek is surrounded by various vegetation including trees, shrubs and tall grasses. Algae were observed on some rocks and floating on top of the water.

A beaver dam was located downstream of the outfall causing the upstream water depth to increase. Benthic sampling at this site did not occur this year due to increased water levels upstream from the beaver dam. The water clarity was observed to be cloudy and poor upstream and relatively clear downstream this difference may have been due to the difference in water depth.


23


Beaver Dam 6-June-2013

24

6.4 Green Lane - Site #4

This site is located on a private road owned by Orgaworld. This road allows access to its recycling depot, BFI, and the Orgaworld composting plant. The closed Westminster PCP is located on the North side of the site. The surrounding creek land use is primarily agriculture. There are two large and one small storm sewer discharges upstream. The substrate consisted of large rocks, clay, sand, silt and tree roots (downstream). The water clarity was poor and the riparian vegetation consisted of tall grasses, trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.

The taxa richness this year was 12, a decrease from 14 in 2012. The dominant taxa this year was aquatic worms, similar to 2012, consisting of 50.0% of the sampled benthic community. The FBI was 7.06 (Poor) similar in water quality of 7.02 (poor) in 2012. Shannon’s diversity index (H’) was 0.57 a decrease from 0.67 in 2012.

Upstream 6-Jun-2013

25

Downstream 6-Jun-2013

Bridge 6-Jun-2013

26

0

5

10

15

20

25

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Taxa

Ric

hn

ess

Year

Green Lane Taxa Richness, 1999 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

Green Lane Family Biotic Index, 1999 - 2013

27

6.5 White Oak Road - Site #5

This site is located at the corner of White Oak Road and Dingman Drive. Similarly to the other sampling sites located along Dingman Creek, the surrounding land use is agricultural. A storm sewer outlet was located upstream. The riparian vegetation upstream consisted of tall grasses and herbaceous vegetation whereas mature trees and shrubs were predominating downstream. The substrate was mainly silty sand with pebbles, a few rocks, and very muddy under the bridge, clay and organic matter was observed upstream. The creek was swollen and water clarity was very poor due to a recent rainstorm, no shallow areas were visible and some algae was present on banks.

The taxa richness was 14, an increase from 13 in 2012. As was the case last year, the dominant taxa were fingernail clams representing 43.11 % of the sampled benthic macroinvertebrate community. The FBI was 7.26 (Very Poor) a decrease in water quality from 7.13 (Poor) in 2012.

Upstream 11-Jun-2013

28


Bridge 11-Jun-2013

29

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Nu

mb

er

of

Spe

cie

s Fo

un

d

Year

White Oak Taxa Richness, 1999 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

White Oak Family Biotic Index 1999 - 2013

30

6.6 Wonderland Road - Site #6

This site is one of the additions in 2004 to assess water quality between the White Oak Road and Lambeth site. Located on Wonderland Rd. S just north of the 402 overpass, there is a large farm that runs along the creek from White Oak Road to this site. In the past there has been a decrease in the water quality at the sampling site, however; since 2008 there has been an increase in the taxa diversity showing that the quality of the water has been improving except for the slight decrease in 2010. The creek at this location is surrounded by agricultural fields and a few residences. A sewage odour was present downstream, and the riparian vegetation included some tall grasses with mature trees and the water clarity was poor. The creek substrate consisted of tree branches, gravel, mud and organic matter.

The taxa richness this year was 17, an increase from 15 in 2012. Consistent with the past 3 consecutive years, aquatic worm was the dominant taxon representing 40.62% of the sampled benthic community. The calculated FBI was 6.84 (Poor) an increase in quality from last year, 7.41 (Very Poor).

Upstream12-Jun-2013

31


Bridge 12-Jun-2013

32

0

5

10

15

20

25

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Taxa

Ric

hn

ess

Year

Wonderland Taxa Richness, 1999 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

Wonderland Family Biotic Index, 1999 - 2013

33

6.7 Colonel Talbot Road - Site #7

This site has been monitored since 2004 and is downstream from the Wonderland Road sampling site. Greenhills Golf Course is directly east and residences are located to the west. The storm outlet that was observed last year was not visible due to high water levels; the stream was very swollen and water clarity was poor due to a recent intense rain event. Large trees, shrubs, tall grasses and herbaceous vegetation along the banks were submerged.

The taxa richness was found to be increasing since 2008. This year there was a decrease of taxa richness to 12, from 18 in 2012. Similarly to previous year’s sampling, aquatic worms were the dominant taxa making up 83.95% of the samples. The calculated FBI was 7.51 (Very Poor) a decrease in quality from last year’s value of 7.47 (Fairly Poor).

Upstream 17-Jun-2013

34


Bridge 17-Jun-2013

35

0

5

10

15

20

25

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Taxa

Ric

hn

ess

Year

Colonel Talbot Taxa Richness, 2004 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

Colonel Talbot Family Biotic Index, 2004 - 2013

36

6.8 Lambeth - Site #8

This is the most westerly site and is located where Highway 2 crosses Dingman Creek in Lambeth. In 2009, due to high water levels and difficulty sampling at Lambeth, insufficient biota was obtained in the first sample; so the second sample was taken at Kilbourne Rd., just west of Colonel Talbot Rd in Lambeth. Since 2010, the sampling has been conducted at the Lambeth site located on Longwoods Road; and high water levels due to recent heavy rainfall were observed in 2013. The surrounding land use consists of Lambeth Centennial park located to the north, residential to the east and agricultural lands to the west.

The taxa richness was 13, a decrease from 19 in 2012, with aquatic worms, similar to 2012, dominating 55.63 % of the sampled benthic community. The calculated FBI was 7.15 (Poor) a decrease in quality from 6.89 (Poor) in 2012.


37


Bridge 19-June-2013

38

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Taxa

Ric

hn

ess

Year

Lambeth Taxa Richness, 1999 - 2013

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Year

Lambeth Family Biotic Index, 1999 - 2013

39

7.0 Additional Statistical Analysis

The Pollution Tolerance Index, Taxa Richness, Simpson’s Indices for diversity, evenness, Hilsenhoff’s Family Biotic Index and Shannon’s Diversity Index are indices used in the following table.

Table 3: Data Analysis Results

Site Taxa Richness

Taxa Diversity

Taxa Evenness

FBI Shannon’s Diversity H’

1. Old Victoria Rd. 7 3.5348 0.5050 5.5429 (F) 0.6367

2. Highbury Ave. 17 3.7459 0.2203 7.5618 (VP) 0.7431

3. Green Valley Rd. Not Sampled

Not Sampled

Not Sampled

Not Sampled Not Sampled

4. Green Lane 12 2.7667 0.2306 7.0622(P) 0.5717

5. White Oak Rd. 14 2.7189 0.1942 7.2649 (VP) 0.5545

6. Wonderland Rd. 17 3.6441 0.2144 6.8370 (P) 0.7645

7. Colonel Talbot Rd. 12 1.4122 0.1177 7.5084 (VP) 0.3432

8. Lambeth 13 2.3630 0.1818 7.1553 (VP) 0.4940

*P = Poor, FP = Fairly Poor, F = Fair, G = Good, E = Excellent

Taxa richness measures the number of different taxa found in the sample. Highbury Avenue and Wonderland Road had the highest taxa richness with 17, followed by White Oak Road having 14 taxa representing the sample. Old Victoria had the lowest taxa richness with only 7 taxa present.

High diversity values are an indication of a balanced and stable benthic community. Stable benthic communities are represented by a large number of taxa present in similar numbers. Highbury Avenue had the highest diversity value of all sampled sites of 3.75, while the site with the lowest diversity value of 1.41 was Colonel Talbot, which was dominated by aquatic worms (83.95%) and Midges (3.68%). Both taxa are tolerant of pollution, indicating an unstable benthic community.

Evenness measures how abundance is divided among all taxa present in the sample, an even community is represented by taxa present in equal proportions whereas uneven communities are dominated by one or few taxa. Old Victoria Road had the greatest taxa evenness and Colonel Talbot had the lowest evenness. White Oak, Colonel Talbot and Lambeth all had relatively low taxa evenness, and although the dominant taxa at White Oak was fingernail clams, there was also a high number of aquatic worms present causing a low taxa evenness. At Colonel Talbot and Lambeth, at least half of the sampled benthic community was dominated by a single species. Due to the formula used to calculate evenness, samples with very low taxa richness and had one taxon dominating the sample may indicate an acceptable evenness value, while the sample is still very uneven.

40

The Family Biotic Index results indicate that the site with the best water quality was Old Victoria, similarly to the 2012, with a value of 5.54 and a Fair water quality rating. The site with the lowest water quality was Highbury Avenue with a FBI value of 7.56 and a Very Poor water quality rating. Overall, 4 out of 7 sites (Highbury, White Oak, Colonel Talbot and Lambeth) scored very poor. Green Lane, and Wonderland, scored a water quality rating of poor. Compared to last year, all but two sites’ family biotic index ratings have increased indicating a decrease in water quality, except for Old Victoria and Wonderland. Rainfall in 2012 was about 30 % below average and rainfall in 2013 based on the first six months was 1,136 mm annual average equivalent. The 2013 rainfall was about 30% above average. There would be a significant difference in runoff between 2012 and 2013. At the Green Lane, Wonderland, Colonel Talbot and Lambeth sampling locations the dominant taxa of the sampled benthic community was aquatic worms, which are very pollution tolerant. Midges, also pollution tolerant taxa were the dominant taxa at Highbury and Fingernail Clams also a pollution tolerant species was the dominant taxa at White Oak.

Shannon’s diversity index (H’) is a measure that describes how diverse the benthic community is and also how the abundance of the taxa are distributed among all of the taxa in the community. High H’ represents a more diverse community with a proportional distribution of taxa. The site with the highest index was Wonderland with a value of 0.76. The site with the lowest index value was Colonel Talbot with a value of 0.34. Shannon’s diversity index values are also consistent with Simpson’s diversity and evenness results.

Overall, as the water quality decreases, the number of individuals of pollution tolerant taxa increase, the ratios between the different types of taxa increases and pollution tolerant taxa become more prevalent.

41

8.0 Results Tables and Graphs

8.1 Quantitative Results

Taxa (Common Name)

Taxa (Scientific Name)

Site 1

Site 2

Site 3

Site 4

Site 5

Site 6

Site 7

Site 8

Riffle Beetle Elmidae 1 2 - 0 0 4 0 7

Riffle Beetle Larvae Elmidae 0 0 - 0 5 6 4 2

Water Penny Beetle Psephenidae 0 0 - 0 0 3 0 0

Scud Gammaridae 0 9 - 0 0 2 0 1

Leech Helobdella 0 1 - 2 5 8 0 3

Fingernail Clam Shaeriidae 32 44 - 17 319 101 0 28

Water Boatman Corixidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 0

Midge Larvae Chironomidae 7 221 - 140 47 30 11 195

Midge Pupa Chironomidae 4 1 - 0 0 2 0 2

Midge Chironomidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Mayfly Nymph Ephemeroptera 0 1 - 0 3 31 7 0

Aquatic Worm Oligochaeta 3 167 - 217 311 184 251 326

Biting Midge Larvae Ceratopogonidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 2 0

Biting Midge Pupae Ceratopogonidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Sowbug Asellidae 0 23 - 24 3 11 3 0

Gilled Snail Prosobranch 16 18 - 5 15 8 4 11

Lunged Snail Pulmonate 3 19 - 1 0 8 4 6

Crayfish Decapoda 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 0

Crayfish Larvae Decapoda 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Stone Fly Nymph Chloroperlidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Alderfly Larvae Sialidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Pyralid Caterpillar Lepydoptera 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 0

Caddisfly Larvae Hydroptilldae 42 2 - 22 1 3 0 0

Cranefly Larvae Tipuidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Beetle Helophorus 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Deer Fly/Horse Fly Larvae

Tabanidae 0 1 - 3 0 3 8 0

Deer Fly/Horse Fly Pupae

Tabanidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 3

Black Fly Larvae Simuliidae 0 26 - 0 18 0 0 0

Black Fly Pupae Simuliidae 0 0 - 1 8 0 0 0

Flatworm Planaria 0 0 - 0 2 0 0 0

Dragonfly Nymph Anisoptera 0 1 - 0 0 1 0 0

Damselfly Nymph Zygoptera 0 5 - 0 0 6 0 3

Diving Beetle Haliplidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Diving Beetle Larvae Haliplidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Water Strider Gerridae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Water Mite Arachnidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 1

42

Taxa (Common Name)

Taxa (Scientific Name)

Site 1

Site 2

Site 3

Site 4

Site 5

Site 6

Site 7

Site 8

Dobsonfly Larvae Corydalidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Soldierfly Larvae Stratiomyidae 0 9 - 1 2 0 0 0

Crawling Beetle Haliplidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Crawling Beetle larvae

Haliplidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 1

Water Beetle Haliplidae 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0

Dancefly Larvae Empididae 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0

Total Number of Individuals:

100 550 - 434 740 411 299 586

43

8.2 Taxa Richness

8.3 Family Biotic Index

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Old Victoria Highbury Green Lane White Oak Wonderland Colonel Talbot Lambeth

Nu

mb

er

of

Spe

cie

s Fo

un

d

Sampling Site

Dingman Creek Taxa Richness, 2013

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8


Fam

ily B

ioti

c In

de

x

Sampling Site

Dingman Creek Family Biotic Index, 2013

44

8.4 Shannon’s Diversity Index

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8


Shan

no

n's

Div

ers

ity

Ind

ex

Sampling Site

Dingman Creek Shannon's Diversity Index, 2013

45

9.0 Water Quality Observations

Table 4: Water Quality Observations

Site Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)

pH Temperature (°C)

1. Old Victoria 8.44 7.29 7.0

2. Highbury 8.28 7.02 14.8

3. Green Valley Not sampled due to high water levels caused by a beaver dam

Not sampled due to high water levels caused by a beaver dam

Not sampled due to high water levels caused by a beaver dam

4. Green Lane 8.42 7.04 14.5

5. White Oak 7.41 7.02 16.5

6. Wonderland 7.80 7.78 17.8

7. Colonel Talbot 7.39 7.66 22.0

8. Lambeth 9.24 7.91 19.3

46

10.0 Observations and Conclusions

A diverse and proportionally distributed benthic macroinvertebrate community is an indicator of a balanced and stable community. Higher diversity indicates that the aquatic environment is suitable for many different types of macroinvertebrate communities. As the water quality decreases the taxa diversity decreases because more pollution tolerant taxa become present and pollution intolerant taxa disappear.

Macrophytes present in the creek can provide habitat and nutrients for benthic macroinvertebrates. Dense plant growth was present at the Highbury, White Oak and Wonderland sampling locations. The plant growth is also indicative of higher nutrient loadings, which may have been due to run-off from agricultural fields that are in close proximity to the creek at these sites.

The dissolved oxygen levels of Dingman Creek ranged from 7.39 mg/L at the Colonel Talbot site to 9.24 mg/L at the Lambeth site. There were slight variations in pH across all sampling locations ranging from 7.02 at Highbury and White Oak and 7.91 at Lambeth. Old Victoria had the coldest temperature of 7.0oC while the Colonel Talbot site had the warmest temperature of 22.0oC. Lower water temperatures compared to last year and high water levels, especially at Colonel Talbot and Lambeth were due to a large amount of precipitation this sampling season. The annual rainfall in 2012 was 660mm with an average of 970 mm for the past 27 years. The rainfall for the first 6 months of 2013 was an average of 1,136 mm.

10.1 Comparison

Dingman Creek Taxa Richness:

The taxa richness decreased for 4 sampled sites compared to 2012 with the greatest decrease occurring at the Colonel Talbot and Lambeth site. Decreasing taxa diversity indicates an overall decline in creek water quality. Conversely, the Highbury Ave site had the greatest decrease in 2012 where as in 2013 it had the greatest increase in taxa richness. The taxa richness increased from 12 in 2012 to 17 observed in 2013.

Dingman Creek Family Biotic Index:

Compared to the 2012 FBI ratings, most of the sites had an increase in the FBI values (decrease in quality) with the exception of Highbury and Wonderland which improved from 6.25 to 5.54 and 7.41 to 6.83, respectively. Overall, the FBI results indicate a decrease in creek health.

47

10.2 Overview

Water pollution can reduce the number of macroinvertebrate species present, since the aquatic environment can only sustain pollution tolerant species and sensitive species tend to disappear. The Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index is formulated on the basis that different organism’s degree in pollution tolerance differs.

For example, gill breathing Stonefly, Mayfly and Caddisfly taxa are only able to survive where there is an abundant amount of dissolved oxygen. These species are intolerant of pollution because their sole oxygen requirements come from the water. Other macroinvertebrates that can survive at low dissolved oxygen concentrations can breathe atmospheric oxygen or have respiratory adaptations that allow them to capture low amounts of dissolved oxygen from the waters. Due to different respiration methods of benthic macroinvertebrates the pollution tolerance values for each family are ranked by their dissolved oxygen requirements and response to organic pollution. When organic pollution is present the biochemical oxygen demand is high due to the decomposition of the organic matter which requires oxygen.

Using the FBI can provide a rapid evaluation of water quality without the requirement of being able to identify organisms at the genus or species level. The FBI uses an average pollution tolerance score for a family instead of difference in species. =

Additional quantitative and qualitative information should also be collected for the interpretation of the creek health such as species diversity, physical and chemical water parameters.

48

11.0 Recommendations

1) Effort should be made to ensure that all individual specimens collected are included in the FBI and to ensure proper representation of the sample collected, and increase accuracy.

2) Sampling should continue to take place at the same time each year. This eliminates certain fluctuations in species numbers as metamorphism may occur at different times of the year for different organisms.

3) Sampling should be held off on days which follow greater than average precipitation events as the normal creek width will be difficult to determine and the banks will be flooded. The water levels will also become higher than average and pose difficulty for sampling the middle of the creek.

4) To improve consistency and to avoid further inconsistencies between samples, an effort should be made to collect samples of consistent size using the Eckman sampler. Also, if possible samples should be taken near the same location each year to eliminate variations in sample substrate that may have an effect on the families of macroinvertebrates collected.

5) Ongoing studies should be conducted due to fluctuating water quality from year to year.

49

Table 5: Dingman Creek Indices: Taxa Richness

Year Old Victoria

Highbury Green Valley Green Lane

White Oak Wonderland Colonel Talbot Lambeth

1999 9 5 4 7 9 - - 8

2000 9 14 4 4 7 - - 5

2001 8 8 7 8 5 - - 6

2002 13 9 10 10 10 - - 7

2003 10 7 8 8 10 - - 6

2004 9 9 9 6 9 5 7 6

2005 9 8 5 6 9 12 6 13

2006 11 14 12 5 16 18 7 14

2007 8 9 14 14 14 12 17 14

2008 10 17 15 15 17 21 14 15

2009 11 16 18 14 12 21 16 18

2010 20 21 20 16 14 19 17 17

2011 11 23 20 23 18 23 23 25

2012 9 12 Not Sampled due to high water levels

13 13 15 18 19

2013 7 17 Not Sampled due to high water levels

12 14 17 12 13

50

Table 6: Dingman Creek Indices: Family Biotic Index

Year Old Victoria Highbury Green Valley Green Lane White Oak Wonderland Colonel Talbot Lambeth

1999 6.06 6.52 6.43 5.82 6.33 - - 6.22

2000 7.42 6.61 7.09 7.65 7.74 - - 7.66

2001 6.46 5.93 6.77 6.72 7.75 - - 6.97

2002 6.07 6.57 6.08 6.20 6.75 - - 6.17

2003 6.31 6.57 6.18 6.36 7.01 - - 6.23

2004 6.14 7.06 6.70 6.57 7.83 7.53 6.30 6.69

2005 6.03 6.70 6.10 6.50 6.25 5.90 6.89 6.46

2006 6.02 6.04 6.10 6.06 5.93 6.41 6.60 6.46

2007 6.38 7.09 6.30 6.15 6.37 7.53 6.63 5.85

2008 6.11 6.68 7.35 6.03 6.67 6.69 5.77 6.22

2009 5.39 7.46 5.94 6.03 5.89 5.47 5.89 6.13

2010 6.17 6.28 6.62 6.29 6.25 6.53 5.86 6.18

2011 4.45 6.70 4.86 6.30 7.59 7.54 7.37 7.48

2012 6.25 7.26 Not Determined 7.02 7.13 7.41 7.47 6.88

2013 5.54 7.61 Not Determined 7.07 7.26 6.84 7.51 7.15

51

12.0 Sampling Locations of Dingman Creek

52

Appendix A: Benthic Survey Field Notes

Benthic Survey Field Notes: Station 1

Date: June 3, 2013

Station: 1

Body of Water: Dingman

Location: Old Victoria

Sampling Equipment: Eckamn

Other Samples: DO, pH

Comments: Riparian growth: silver maple, crab apple and willow. Old Victoria bridge re-done; therefore, buffer on either side of the creek to prevent cement contamination. Buffer made up of cloth, hay bale, wire fence and posts.

Site Characteristics

Stream Width: 1-2m

Depth: 0.5m

Substrate: rock, mud, pebbles, gravel and twigs

Water Clarity: good

Odour: None

Macrophytes: Reeds and Tall grass

Algae: some attached to rocks

Bank Vegetation: tall grass, trees, shrubs, herbaceous vegetation

Land Use: Agriculture; corn fields

Water Temperature: 14.1C

General: DO –8.44mg/L; pH – 7.29

53

Map

54

Bio Survey Card: Station 1

Sampling Date: June 3, 2013

Station: 1

Survey Type: Benthic

Location: Dingman Creek

Description of Station: Old Victoria

Collection Method: Eckman

General Group U/S Bridge D/S Total

Caddisfly Larva 21 6 15 42

Gilled Snail 3 8 5 16

Midge Larvae 1 3 3 7

Fingernail Clam 19 6 7 32

Segmented Worm 0 0 2 2

Midge Pupae 0 0 4 4

Aquatic Worm 1 1 1 3

Riffle Beetle Adult 1 0 0 1

Total 46 24 37 107

FBI: 5.5400 - Fair

55


Date: June 5, 2013

Station: 2


Location: Highbury

Sampling Equipment: Eckman


Comments: Lots of vegetation on creek bed.


Stream Width: 4m

Depth: 0.05m

Substrate: sand, silt, weed, organic matter, mud and tree rootss

Water Clarity: poor

Odour: None

Macrophytes: grasses, seaweed and herbaceous vegetation

Algae: some attached to rocks and along creek bank

Bank Vegetation: tall grass and trees; willows and ash

Land Use: Agriculture

Water Temperature: 14.8C


56

Map

57



Station: 2



Description of Station: Highbury



Midge 59 60 97 221

Midge Pupae 1 0 0 1

Aquatic worm 110 51 6 167



Lunged Snail 8 6 5 19

Black Fly Larvae 2 16 8 26

Damselfly nymph 2 1 2 5

Riffle Beetle Larvae 2 3 4 9

Scud 1 9 0 9

Riffle Beetle (adult) 2 0 0 2

Leech 0 0 1 1

Sow bug 12 10 1 23

Caddisfly 0 2 0 2

May fly Nymph 1 0 0 1

Dragonfly nymph 1 0 0 1

Horsefly Larvae 1 0 0 1

Total 233 170 143 550

FBI: 7.56 – Very Poor

58


Date: June 6, 2013

Station: 3


Location: Green Valley Road



Comments: Beaver dam downstream of outfall, stream depth too great to sample


Stream Width: N/A

Depth: N/A

Substrate:

Water Clarity:

Odour:

Macrophytes:

Algae: some on rocks and mud

Bank Vegetation: tall grasses, trees and shrubs

Land Use: stormwater retention ditch

Water Temperature:

General:

59

Map

60


Date: June 6, 2013

Station: 4


Location: Green lane



Comments: Storm sewer discharge upstream (2 large, 1 small)


Stream Width: 3m

Depth: 0.48m

Substrate: rocks, clay, sand, silt, gravel, boulders

Water Clarity: poor

Odour: decomposing organic matter

Macrophytes: weeds

Algae: some attached to rocks and along bottom of creek

Bank Vegetation: tall grass, trees, shrubs, wildflowers and weeds


Water Temperature: 14.5 °C


61

Map

62



Station: 4



Description of Station: Green lane



Leech 0 1 1 2

Aquatic worm 40 143 33 217

Midge 5 74 61 140

Caddisfly 0 9 13 22


Riffle Beetle Larva 0 0 1 1

Sow bug 0 23 1 24




Blackfly Pupae 0 1 0 1

Dancefly Larvae 0 1 0 1

Total 45 275 113 444

FBI: 7.06 - Poor

63


Date: June 11, 2013

Station: 5


Location: White Oak Road



Comments: Storm sewer outlet upstream; water quality very poor and water is greater in depth due to a recent rainstorm


Stream Width: 7.6m

Depth: 0.85m

Substrate: Silty, small pebbles, gravel, a few rocks, clay and organic matter mostly u/s and bridge. Very muddy under bridge

Water Clarity: very poor

Odour: none

Macrophytes: seaweed

Algae: algae on edge of banks

Bank Vegetation: tall grass, trees, shrubs, and weeds




64

Map

65



Station: 5



Description of Station: White Oak Road




Midge 41 3 3 47



Blackfly Larvae 0 12 6 18

Blackfly Pupae 0 3 5 8


Leech 0 5 0 5

Mayfly Nymph 0 2 1 3

Flat worm 0 2 0 2

Crayfish 0 1 0 1

Caddisfly 0 1 0 1

Sow Bug 0 2 1 3

Total 160 362 238 740

FBI: 7.26 – Very poor

66


Date: June 12, 2013

Station: 6


Location: Wonderland



Comments: Sewage odour downstream


Stream Width: 4.5m

Depth: 0.5m

Substrate: Clay, pebbles, small gravel, silt, big rocks under bridge, a lot of tree branches on bottom, mostly muddy organic matter

Water Clarity: poor

Odour: sewage odour

Macrophytes: seaweed

Algae: algae on rocks

Bank Vegetation: Mature trees, herbaceous vegetation, wild flowers and some tall grasses

Land Use: Agriculture, residential



67

Map

68



Station: 6



Description of Station: Wonderland


FBI: 6.84 - Poor


Mayfly 13 16 2 31

Caddisfly 3 0 0 3


Midge Pupae 0 2 0 2






Riffle beetle adult 0 4 0 4

Water Penny 3 0 0 3

Leech 2 5 1 8

Dragonfly Nymph 0 1 0 1

Damselfly Nymph 0 6 0 6

Sow bug 0 5 6 11

Scud 0 2 0 2

Horsefly 0 1 2 3

Total 239 91 81 411

69


Date: June 17, 2013

Station: 7


Location: Colonel Talbot



Comments: Sewage Groundwater outlet u/s. Storm outlet d/s found previous 2012 benthic sampling year was not visible due to high water levels. Very high water levels and creek width due to few days of rain fall.


Stream Width: 15m

Depth: 1.25m

Substrate: Organic matter, sand and silt upstream, mud on bank and under bridge. Tree branches along bank.


Odour: D/S and U/S sweage smell

Macrophytes: seaweed u/s

Algae: Not visible due to high water levels and very poor water clarity

Bank Vegetation: Mature trees u/s; maple, willow. Shrubs, tall grasses and herbaceous vegetation.

Land Use: East: Golf Course , West: Private



70

Map

71



Station: 7



Description of Station: Colonel Talbot








Sow Bug 0 2 1 3

Mayfly 0 7 0 7

Water Boatman 0 1 0 1

Pyralid 0 1 0 1

Biting Midge 0 2 0 2

Horsefly Pupae 0 0 3 3


Total 73 145 77 299

FBI: 7.51 – very poor

72


Date: June 19, 2013

Station: 8


Location: Lambeth



Comments: High water levels due to previous days of rain fall. Broken storm sewer upstream. Oily substance found downstream from bridge as well as a sewage odor.


Stream Width: 7.5m

Depth: 1.15m

Substrate: Rocky, weeds, clay, sand and tree branches


Odour: sweage smell

Macrophytes: Some seaweed but most not visible due to high water levels and poor water clarity

Algae: on rocks

Bank Vegetation: Trees, grass, shrubs, herbaceous vegetation. Many Manitoba Maples

Land Use: Agricultural, residential, Public Park



73

Map

74



Station: 8



Description of Station: Lambeth






Riffle beetle Adult 4 1 2 7

Damselfly Nymph 1 0 2 3

Midge Pupae 1 0 1 2




Leech 1 2 0 3

Scud 1 0 0 1

Mite 1 0 0 1

Crawling Beetle Larva 1 0 0 1

Total 218 108 260 586

FBI: 7.15 – Very poor

75

Appendix B: Quantitative Data Sheets

Old Victoria 2013 Dingman

Total # of Individuals 105

Taxa Richness 7

Taxa Diversity, D 3.5348

Taxa Eveness, E 0.5050

Dominant Taxon Caddisfly Larva

Dominant Taxon % 40.00%

FBI 5.5429 - Poor

Shannon Diversity, H' 0.636784735

Common Name Taxonomic Name

Life Stage

B.I. Total # Pi Pi2 FBI H'

Aquatic worm Oligochaeta A 8 3 0.028571 0.000816 24 0.044116

Gilled Snail Gastropoda N 6 16 0.152381 0.02322 96 0.124506

Midge Larvae Chironomidae L 6 7 0.066667 0.004444 42 0.078406

Fingernail Clam Sphaeriidae A 7 32 0.304762 0.09288 224 0.157269

Caddisfly Larva Hydropsychidae L 4 42 0.4 0.16 168 0.159176

Midge Pupae Chironomidae A 6 4 0.038095 0.001451 24 0.054062

Riffle Beetle Adult Elmidae A 4 1 0.009524 9.07E-05 4 0.019249

Total - - - 105 0.952381 0.282902 582 0.636785

76

Highbury 2013 Dingman


Life Stage


Fingernail Clams Shaeriidae A 7 44 0.08 0.0064 308 0.087753

Sow Bug Asellidae A 8 23 0.0418182 0.001749 184 0.057652

Aquatic Worm Oligochaeta A 8 167 0.3036364 0.092195 1336 0.157176

Midge Chironomidae P 8 1 0.0018182 3.31E-06 8 0.004982

Midge Chironomidae L 8 221 0.4018182 0.161458 1768 0.159108

Blacky Fly Larvae Simuliidae L 6 26 0.0472727 0.002235 156 0.062655

Caddisfly Hydropsychidae L 6 2 0.0036364 1.32E-05 12 0.00887

Scud Gammaridae A 4 9 0.0163636 0.000268 36 0.029227

Riffle Beetle Elmidae L 4 9 0.0163636 0.000268 36 0.029227

Gilled Snail Prosobranch A 6 18 0.0327273 0.001071 108 0.048603

Lunged Snail Pulmonate A 8 19 0.0345455 0.001193 152 0.050492

Damselfly Nymph Zygoptera N 5 5 0.0090909 8.26E-05 25 0.018558

Leech Helobdella A 9 1 0.0018182 3.31E-06 9 0.004982

Mayfly Ephemeroptera N 4 1 0.0018182 3.31E-06 4 0.004982

Dragonfly Nymph Anisoptera N 3 1 0.0018182 3.31E-06 3 0.004982

Horsefly/Deerfly Larvae

Tabanidae L 6 1 0.0018182 3.31E-06 6 0.004982

Riffle Beetle Elmidae A 4 2 0.0036364 1.32E-05 8 0.00887

Total - - - 550 1 0.266962 4159 0.743105


Taxa Richness 17



Dominant Taxon Midge Larvae


FBI 7.5618 - Very Poor


77

Green Lane 2013 Dingman


Life Stage


Riffle Beetle Larvae Elmidae L 4 1 0.002304 5.31E-06 4 0.006077


Sow Bug Asellidae A 8 24 0.0553 0.003058 192 0.069527



Caddisfly Hydropsychidae L 4 22 0.050691 0.00257 88 0.065649

Horsefly/ Deerfly Larvae

Tabanidae L 6 3 0.006912 4.78E-05 18 0.014933

Blackfly Larvae Simuliidae L 6 1 0.002304 5.31E-06 6 0.006077

Dancefly Larvae Empididae L 6 1 0.002304 5.31E-06 6 0.006077

Midge Chironomidae L 6 140 0.322581 0.104058 840 0.158504

Lunged Snails Pulmonate A 8 1 0.002304 5.31E-06 8 0.006077

Gilled Snails Prosobranch A 6 5 0.011521 0.000133 30 0.022333

Total - - - 434 1 0.361443 3065 0.571651


Taxa Richness 12



Dominant Taxon Aquatic Worm


FBI 7.0622 - Poor


78

White Oak 2013 Dingman


Life Stage



Blackfly Larvae Simuliidae L 6 18 0.024324 0.000592 108 0.039258

Blackfly Pupa Simuliidae P 6 8 0.010811 0.000117 48 0.021256

Caddisfly Larve Hydropsychidae L 4 1 0.001351 1.83E-06 4 0.003877

Crayfish Decapoda A 6 1 0.001351 1.83E-06 6 0.003877


Flat Worm Planaria A 4 2 0.002703 7.3E-06 8 0.006941



Mayfly Nymph Ephemeroptera P 4 3 0.004054 1.64E-05 12 0.009698


Riffle Beetle Larva Elmidae L 4 7 0.009459 8.95E-05 28 0.019147

Sowbug Asellidae A 8 3 0.004054 1.64E-05 24 0.009698

Total - - - 740 1 0.36779 5376 0.554525

Total # of individuals 740

Taxa Richness 14



Dominant Taxon Fingernail Clam



Shannon Diversity ,H' 0.5545

79

Wonderland 2013 Dingman

Common Name Taxonomic Name Life Stage B.I. Total # Pi Pi2 FBI H'


Scud Gammaridae A 4 2 0.004866 2.37E-05 8 0.011255

Horsefly Larvae Tabanidae L 6 3 0.007299 5.33E-05 18 0.015597

Caddisfly Larve Hydropsychidae L 4 3 0.007299 5.33E-05 12 0.015597


Water Penny Psephenidae A 4 3 0.007299 5.33E-05 12 0.015597


Leech Helobdella A 9 8 0.019465 0.000379 72 0.033299

Dragonfly Nymph Anisoptera N 3 1 0.002433 5.92E-06 3 0.00636

Mayfly Nymph Ephemeroptera P 4 31 0.075426 0.005689 124 0.084664

Damselfly Nymph Zygoptera N 5 6 0.014599 0.000213 30 0.026798

Midge Pupae Chironomidae P 6 2 0.004866 2.37E-05 0.011255


Riffle Beetle Adult Elmidae A 6 4 0.009732 9.47E-05 0.019579

Lunged Snail Pulmonate A 8 8 0.019465 0.000379 0.033299

Riffle Beetle Larva Elmidae L 6 6 0.014599 0.000213 36 0.026798

Sowbug Asellidae A 8 11 0.026764 0.000716 88 0.042085

Total - - - 411 1 0.274418 2810 0.764493


Taxa Richness 17





FBI 6.8370 - Poor


80

Colonel Talbot 2013 Dingman



Horsefly Pupae Tabanidae P 6 3 0.010033 0.000101 18 0.020052

Horsefly Larvae Tabanidae L 6 8 0.026756 0.000716 48 0.042076

Water Boatman Corixidae A 5 1 0.003344 1.12E-05 5 0.00828


Mayfly Nymph Ephemeroptera P 4 7 0.023411 0.000548 28 0.038174

Pyralid Lepydoptera L 5 1 0.003344 1.12E-05 0.00828


Biting Midge Chironomidae L 6 2 0.006689 4.47E-05 0.014546

Lunged Snail Pulmonate A 8 4 0.013378 0.000179 0.025065

Riffle Beetle Larva Elmidae L 6 4 0.013378 0.000179 24 0.025065

Sowbug Asellidae A 8 3 0.010033 0.000101 24 0.020052

Total - - - 299 1 0.708124 2245 0.343219


Taxa Richness 12







81

Lambeth 2013 Dingman



Crawling Beetle Larvae Haliplidae L 5 1 0.001706 2.91209E-06 5 0.004723

Damselfly Nymph Zygoptera N 5 3 0.005119 2.62088E-05 15 0.011728


Gilled Snail Gastropoda A 6 11 0.018771 0.000352363 66 0.032409

Lunged Snail Pulmonate A 8 6 0.010239 0.000104835 48 0.020373


Midge Larva Chironomidae L 6 195 0.332765 0.110732216 1170 0.159016

Midge Pupa Chironomidae P 6 2 0.003413 1.16484E-05 12 0.008419

Riffle Beetle Adult Elmidae A 4 7 0.011945 0.000142692 28 0.022969

Riffle Beetle Larva Elmidae L 4 2 0.003413 1.16484E-05 8 0.008419

Scud Gammaridae A 4 1 0.001706 2.91209E-06 4 0.004723

Water Mites Arachnidae A 6 1 0.001706 2.91209E-06 6 0.004723

Total - - - 586 1 0.423184894 4193 0.494019


Taxa Richness 13



Dominant Taxon Aquatic Worms


FBI 7.1553 -Poor


Documents

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Study - London, Ontario · The Dingman Creek benthic macroinvertebrate study was undertaken by the City of London, Environmental & Engineering Services Department